Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: DX, FNB, GYLD

Economy

The USD rose in value yesterday against major currencies.  DXY - U.S. Dollar Index (DXY)Dollar rises across the board as trade tensions brew | Reuters The DXY is heavily weighted in the Euro.  


WSJ Dollar Index Interactive Charts 
BBDXY Quote - Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index - Bloomberg Markets

The Bloomberg Dollar Index gives less weight to the Euro compared to the DXY and includes more currencies: Currency Indices 

The Canadian currency declined to below .76. CADUSD Currency I would attribute the recent decline in the CAD/USD to Donald's trade war with Canada. The odd thing is that Doofus Don is making Canadian goods and services cheaper for purchasers using USDs and is consequently aggravating the export/import balance of trade in favor of Canada.   

Canada to stick to guns at NAFTA talks despite Trump pressure


No NAFTA without cultural exemption and a dispute settlement clause, Trudeau vows | CBC News

Trump’s fight with Canada over NAFTA faces growing opposition at home | Financial Post

The Argentine peso has crashed this year, falling about 45% against the USD. Inflation in Latin America's economy is currently near 25%. In response, Argentina's central bank increased short term rates 15% to 60%. Peso crashes to record low amid IMF plea 

World debt has increased to about $169 trillion from $97 trillion ten years ago. Approximately $10 trillion in corporate bonds will have to be refinanced within the next five years. Are we in a corporate debt bubble? | McKinsey


The ISM manufacturing index increased to 61.3% in August from 58.1 in July. The new orders component increased to 65.1 from 60.2. Those are good numbers. I would call readings above 60 robust. 

++++++++

Markets and Market Commentary

Optimism about the economy is so high it suggests a recession is ‘imminent,’ analyst warns-MarketWatch Imbedded in this article is a chart, going back to 1967, that shows a recession occurs after peaks in consumers becoming more optimistic about the present than in the future. The problem with the chart is that the peak can occur within a wide range based on the historical data. Recessions have started at levels lower than now and only one at a higher level which was in 2000. 

Emerging Markets Continue to Slide as Dollar Pressures $3.7 Trillion Debt Wall - TheStreet The problem here is that corporations in emerging markets have U.S.D. denominated debt and have to service that debt with a currency that has fallen in value against the USD. In some cases, like Turkey's lira, the value of the currency has plummeted.   


++++

Trump

Bob Woodward's Trump book: Author details aides' worries about Trump (the Secretary of Defense James Mattis described Teflon Don as having the understanding of "a fifth or sixth grader" according to Woodward. That is about right. Chief of Staff John Kelly refers to Doofus Don as being "unhinged" and an "idiot". 


I would not disagree. The Donald portrayed in Woodward's book was readily apparent to anyone capable of observation prior to the election.  

I would, however, describe Donald as being more ignorant than stupid, since his stupidity largely flows from his willful ignorance and extreme narcissism which prevents him from recognizing his ignorance.  

Woodward documents that Trump smothers everyone, including his highest ranking aides, with insults, rage, and demeaning comments.  
Bob Woodward’s new book reveals a ‘nervous breakdown’ of Trump’s presidency


Bob Woodward book, "Fear," reveals dysfunction in "crazytown" Trump White House - CBS News  


I have to hand to the reptilian brain. He has an innate sense on how to be an effective demagogue, the first ever elected to be a U.S. President. The fact that Donald is a demagogue is not debatable. 


National Enquirer Had Decades of Trump Dirt. He Wanted to Buy It All.

Ron DeSantis (R) slammed for telling voters not to ‘monkey it up’ and vote for his black gubernatorial opponent in Florida - MarketWatch

Donald is a perpetual motion machine of reality creations. Trump, without evidence, says NBC fudged 2017 Russia interview




In this one, Trump insinuates that NBC doctored the tape where he clearly stated that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation rather than the purported reasons involving Comey's misfeasance. He made a similar suggestion just yesterday that NBC somehow doctored the Access Hollywood tape to make him look bad: 
“There’s even questions about the tape, there’s many things going on.” EXCLUSIVE: Trump Prepped Lawsuit Against NBC Over ‘Access Hollywood’ Tape  

Demagogue Don hates the free press, or anyone else who dares to point out his lies, with a passion:




Trump's usual tactic is to accuse others of lying when he is the one who is lying with an average of 8 false statements per day. It is typical for an authoritarian demagogue to claim that he and his apparatchiks are the only source of truth.

As discussed previously, I view this kind of tweet to be an abuse of presidential power.




This is a direct effort by the President to interfere for political reasons with criminal prosecutions. Trump has no respect for the rule of law. 


Note that Demagogue Don does not address the detailed facts contained in the indictments against representatives Collins and Hunter. 

Instead, he questions the motives of the career prosecutors in bringing the charges.   

Donald also blamed his own Attorney General, a staunch republican, for refusing to stop the legitimate prosecutions for political reasons. Sessions was the first U.S. Senator to endorse Trump.  

Senator Ben Sasse (R-Nebraska), one of the few republican senators who remains tethered to conservatism, responded to Trump as follows:


“The United States is not some banana republic with a two-tiered system of justice — one for the majority and one for the minority party. These two men have been charged with crimes because of evidence, not because of who the president was when the investigations began.”


The Duck has been provoking a lot of threats made by his cult members against reporters.


The Boston Globe received the following call which did result in an arrest:





++++

Trump orders US to strip $200 million in aid from Palestinians - CNN 


Trump, Sessions approved of Putin meeting proposal: former campaign adviser | Reuters

++++

1. Small Ball-Regional Bank Basket Strategy:

A. Sold Highest Cost 50 of 100 FNB Shares at $13.65-Used Commission Free Trade:


2 Year FNB History in this Account:




I sold the 50 share lot bought at $13.08 (7/24/18) per share total cost and kept the 50 shares bought at $12.6 the next day. Item 1.A. Bought Back 50 FNB at $13.08 and 50 at $12.6 (8/1/18 Post) The downdraft on 7/25 occurred on the day that FNB released its second quarter report which is discussed in that post.


Profit Snapshot: $28.54




Quote: FNB Stock Quote


Closing Price 9/4/18: FNB $13.54 $ +0.09 +0.67% 

Regional bank stocks had a positive day yesterday as interest rates rose slightly. KRE $63.47 +$0.32 +0.51%: SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF 

FNB Analyst Estimates


Dividend: Quarterly at $.12 per shares, sliced from $.24 per share in 2009 and not raised since that 50% haircut.


FNB Trading Profits to Date: $1,172.28 ($1,143.74 in prior trades)

As discussed in the previously linked post and other posts, I have an unfavorable view of FNB's Board and management who are in an empire building mode that has yet to benefit shareholders IMO, as shown in five year historical data found at page 40 of the 2017 Annual Report. Consequently, I am in a hyper trading mode for this stock.  

2. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy (Maturing within 3 years of the date of purchase):    

A. Bought 2 American Express 2.2% SU Bonds Maturing on 3/3/20


Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Credit Ratings: See Confirmation

Bought at a Total Cost of 99.1 (with $4 Vanguard Commission)
YTM at TC Then at 2.805%
Current Yield at TC = 2.22%

When I bought this bond, the ten year U.S. treasury was trading at a 2.83% yield. 


Over the past several weeks, I have been focusing on buying investment grade corporate bonds maturing in about 18 to 26 months that have yields to maturity greater than, or close to the ten year treasury yield. 

This bond issued by the A2 rated American Express matures in about 18 months and has a slightly lower YTM than the ten year treasury at my total cost when purchased. Without the $4 brokerage commission, the YTM would have been 2.94%.

The two year treasury note, which matures about 6 months after this bond and close to the bond discussed below, closed yesterday near a 2.66% yield-to-maturity. U.S. 2 Year Treasury Note-MarketWatch

B. Bought 2 Biogen 2.9% SU Bonds Maturing on 9/15/20:




FINRA PAGE: Bond Detail (prospectus not linked)

Prospectus

Issuer: Biogen Inc. (BIIB)

BIIB Analyst Estimates

2018 Second Quarter Earnings Report

2017 Annual Report (this is the next BIBB SU bond to mature, see page F-32)
Biogen SEC Filings

Credit Ratings:




Bought at a Total Cost of  99.812  (includes $2 Fidelity Commission)

YTM at TC Then at 2.994%
Current Yield at TC 2.9055%

I prefer to buy short term bonds maturing in 2020 where I my current yield and YTM are close together rather than to have a significant portion of the yield tied up in harvesting the spread between my total cost and par value.


While I don't mind realizing a small gain on a bond trade, my primary reason for investing in bonds is to generate current cash flow that can be aggregated with other cash flow sources to invest in more securities that generate cash flow, all with a capital preservation goal in mind.


C. Bought 1 Enterprise Products Operating LLC 2.55% SU Bond Maturing on 10/15/19:




Finra Page: Bond Detail


Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) who guarantees the note


EPD 2017 Annual Report


Credit Ratings:




Fitch Affirms Enterprise Products Operating at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable (12/21/16)


Enterprise Products Operating LLC recently issued some junior bonds that were rated BBB- by Fitch: Fitch Rates Enterprise Products Operating's Jr. Subordinated Notes Offering 'BBB-'; Outlook Stable (2/1/18). The senior unsecured bonds were affirmed at BBB+.


Bought at a Total Cost of 99.791

YTM at Total Cost Then at 2.736%
Current Yield at Total Cost = 2.5553%

At the time of this trade, the one year treasury bill was trading at a 2.455% YTM. The yield has risen to near 2.49% since this purchase: U.S. 1 Year Treasury Bill 


3. More Small Ball-Income Generation from Securities Held in Very Low Esteem:

A. Bought 50 DX at $6.39-Used Commission Free Trade:




Quote: Dynex Capital Inc. (DX)


Closing Price Yesterday: DX $6.40 -$0.01 -0.16% 

Dynex is an out-of-favor small cap MREIT that has about a $367+M market cap at $6.39 market price.  Dynex Capital, Inc. - Home


The plan is to average down in no more than two 25 share lots using commission free trades.  

While the price has remained mostly in a channel between $5 to $10 since 2002, there was a near collapse in the late 1990s: DX Chart In March 1997, the stock was trading near $62 and had sunk to less than $1 by August 2000.


I do not recall specifically what caused the collapse but this firm was into a lot of things other than owning mortgage backed securities back then. I have never own any DX securities, including it common and equity preferred stocks, before this 50 share purchase.


Chart: Using a one year YF chart, DX was selling at below its 200, 100 and 50 day SMA lines at the time of this 50 share purchase.


Dividend: Quarterly at $.18 per share ($.72 per share annually)


Dividend Yield at $6.39 = 11.27%


Last Ex Dividend Date: 7/3/18


Last Earnings ReportDynex Capital, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results 





Book Value Per Share: $6.93 as of 6/30/18




Discount to 6/30/18 Book Value at a TC of $6.39 per share =  7.79%


2017 Tax Information:


As a pass through entity, DX will not be paying qualified dividends.


For high bracket taxpayers, that is mitigated somewhat by the ROC classification which was at 70.11% of the total last year.




Dynex Capital, Inc. Announces 2017 Dividend Tax Information


When owned in a taxable account, that part of the dividend classified as return of capital ("ROC") is not taxable as a dividend but reduces the tax cost basis by an equivalent amount. By holding the stock for at least one year, the ROC adjustment could become a long term capital gain taxable at a lower rate than the taxpayer's highest marginal tax bracket.


B. Bought 50 GYLD at $17.62 in a Roth IRA Account:




Quote: Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF Overview


Closing Price Yesterday: GYLD $17.250 -$0.080 -0.46% 
52 Week Range as of 9/4/18: $16.98 to $19.24

GYLD One Year Chart (not a total return chart)

Maximum Position: 100 Shares

Except for leveraged ETFs, Vanguard does not currently charge a commission for the purchase of ETFs. This purchase was consequently commission free and would be for all Vanguard brokerage customers.


Sponsor's Page: Arrow Funds Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) - World Allocation





Category Weightings as of 8/23/18:




Snapshot of Some Holdings:




Distributions: Monthly and variable




GYLD_Annual Report_for the period ending 1-31-18.pdf


I will reinvest the dividend.

This ETF has a deserved 1 star rating from Morningstar. I would label this buy as deeply contrarian with a bias toward financial masochism. 


That rating is due in large part to a multi-year storm that caused underperformance in several major asset categories. 


The fund owns energy infrastructure MLPs, which have been in a bear market since 2014, and foreign securities hurt by a rise in the USDs value. At one time, there was some exposure to energy E & P MLPs as I recall, which were smashed, with several filing for bankruptcy. 


Some of those foreign securities are emerging market sovereign bonds which have been declining in price and will probably continue to do so. A bottom is hard to call. 


This ETF has not participated in the market's up move over the past five years which is one reason why I take a nibble now. That is a massive understatement. The five year annual average return through 8/23/18 was .10%.


The expense ratio is high at .75%.


Another reason for buying this security is that it does have a decent yield and can be bought commission free in my Vanguard accounts.


The last reason is that I have so far been able to successfully trade this massively underperforming ETF. Maybe the past will not be prologue.


Links to Some Prior Trade Sell Discussions:


Item # 3 Eliminated GYLD-Sold 201 Shares (1/11/2017 Post)(profit snapshots = $108)


This post contains links to prior discussions:


Item # 6 Sold 50 GYLD at $28.09-Roth IRA (7/19/14 Post)(total return +$154.9)


Item # 4 Sold 100 GYLD at $28.32 (8/9/14 Post)(total return +323.22 or 12.1%)


Sold 100 of the ETF GYLD at $25.49 (2/21/15 Post)


Total GYLD Trading Gains = $452.11 

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

15 comments:

  1. It is my understanding that Donald may impose tariffs on an additional $200B in China's exports on or after 9/7/18. The public comment expires tomorrow and there is no other restraint on the levying of those additional tariffs.

    Gainers:

    Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
    $32.80 +0.38 +1.17%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/fsta

    Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
    $35.83 +$ 0.4447 +1.26%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/futy

    Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
    $25.18 +0.13 +0.52%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/frel

    I would characterize the winning sectors as defensive with higher dividend yields (viewed as bond substitutes by some investors)

    Losing Sectors:

    Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
    $59.53 -$0.94 -1.55%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/ftec

    Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
    $44.97 -$0.47 -1.03%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/fdis

    Interest rates remained close to unchanged.

    The spread between the 2 and 10 year treasury yields closed at .24%.

    https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2018

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since I have several brokerage accounts, I can identify advantages and disadvantages when making a comparison.

    I have discussed with a reader a 1 month treasury bill bought at auction that matured today.

    I bought that 1 month bill in a family member's Fidelity account and the principal amount has been credited already to that account. I could redeploy the proceeds today.

    I bought the same bill in my Schwab account and the principal amount will not be credited and available for redeployment until tomorrow.

    The Schwab sweep account currently pays .22% while the Fidelity Government MM fund currently has a 7 day yield of 1.59%.

    While I will generally get down in the weeds looking for small differences, I have not checked with Schwab whether the one business day delay results in one less day in dividend accrual on the proceeds. I suspect that it does.

    ++

    There is a great deal of speculation on who is the "senior official" in the Trump official who wrote the now infamous and anonymous NYT Op-ED column.

    My best bet is Dan Coats, who is the Director of National Intelligence. Pompeo has denied being the author.

    https://www.weeklystandard.com/michael-warren/these-are-the-four-people-most-likely-to-be-behind-the-anonymous-new-york-times-op-ed-from-the-resistance-inside-the-trump-administration

    Dan Coats is a traditional republican and a good friend of John McCain who is mentioned in the Op-ED. He is 75 years old and has nothing to lose. He would have been highly critical of Trump's response to McCain's death, and the article was published soon thereafter. He is a former U.S. Senator and congressman. There is a focus in the article on national security issues. The writing style of the piece is a common one for politicians.

    ReplyDelete
  3. General Mills Inc. (GIS)
    $46.81 +$1.26 +2.77%
    Last Updated: Sep 6, 2018 at 12:24 p.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/gis

    GIS reaffirmed its 2019 F/Y outlook. The 2018 fiscal year ended on May 27, 2018.

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-mills-reaffirms-fiscal-2019-outlook-300706703.html

    Over the past few weeks, I have seen a large number of Blue Buffalo dog and cat food commercials. Prior to GIS acquiring that company, I do not recall seeing one.

    This is a link to the one that I have seen the most:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UO_4dhQ_Vs&list=PLJxt9W_2Xj9Yd13tzcAvIsq6lm6qK5d-b&t=0s&index=24

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would attribute this week's downdraft in the technology sector to be primarily profit taking.

    As of yesterday, the Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) was up 29.44% over the past year. The annual average total returns were at 25.77% and 20.62% over the past 3 and 5 years respectively.

    http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=XLK&region=USA&culture=en_US

    There is some added impetus to today's downdraft coming from KLA-Tencor (KLAC) who tamped down future expectations:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/kla-tencor-leads-chip-equipment-stocks-lower-after-company-delivers-modestly-weaker-outlook-2018-09-06

    KLA-Tencor:
    $107.50 -$11.3314 -$9.54%
    Last Updated: Sep 6, 2018 at 1:14 p.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/klac

    iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)
    $186.13 -$4.79 -2.51%
    52 WEEK RANGE $148.01 - $198.84
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/soxx

    ReplyDelete
  5. South Gent,

    That was a very reasonable guess on the identify of the anonymous NYT Op-ED column.

    Psychiatrist says WH officials contacted her about Trump's behavior
    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-officials-flagged-trumps-behavior-to-psychiatrist-last-year/ar-BBMYhWj?ocid=DELLDHP15

    It appears people both inside and outside of the Government are now more willing to voice their concerns about the mental fitness of our President. This might signal the beginning of the end of Trump presidency. Time will tell.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: Trump will remain in office for his entire term IMO.

      The revelations that have come out this week are nothing new.

      Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) said as much:

      "This is what all of us have understood to be the situation from day one... I understand this is the case and that’s why I think all of us encourage the good people around the President to stay. I thank General Mattis whenever I see him..."

      There is no new news about Trump's fitness to be President. Much of what is in Woodward's book has been previously reported by the NYT or the WP.

      The republicans will not even call witnesses and ask them questions on Trump's fitness under oath, even though many will acknowledge privately their concerns.


      Tonight Trump said that the NYT committed "treason" by publishing the op-ed piece.

      https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tags-new-york-times-treason-charge-n907336

      That statement, along with countless others made virtually every day, indicates to me that he is unfit to be President within the meaning of the 25th Amendment.

      Yet, the process will never be initiated since it would first require Pence and a majority of the cabinet to certify in writing that Donald was unfit. And, when Donald disagreed, it would require a 2/3rds vote in both chambers to remove him. So that is not going to happen.

      You would not get a single republican vote next year after Corker and a few others retire, even if Donald was clearly suffering from a variety of mental illnesses that made him incompetent to serve as President.

      Coats denied that he "wrote" the article. You never know with these people. That could be a lie or what I call a lawyer's lie, which is true as far as it goes but leads the listener to a false conclusion. He could have summarized in detail what he wanted to say to someone who wrote the article. There seems to be more than one person involved based on the content. A speechwriter could have written what he was told by others to write.

      I recall that several Trump officials denied that Trump used the phrase "shit hole" to describe African countries. Their denial turned out to be based on what they think they heard him say, which was "shit house".

      https://www.vox.com/2018/1/16/16897016/trump-shithole-shithouse-countries

      Delete
  6. Medical Properties Trust Inc.
    $14.94 -$0.04 -0.23%
    Last Updated: Sep 7, 2018 at 10:15 a.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/mpw

    MPW is not responding to the announcement, made after the close yesterday, that it had sold a medical center to the Nashville based HCA for $148M, which will result in "an approximate $100 million gain for MPT and an unlevered internal rate of return of more than 17% since the completion of development in 2007."

    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180906005898/en/

    REITs are down slightly so far today as interest rates popped after the jobs report. The wage gain number was larger than expected.

    Vanguard Real Estate ETF
    $83.22 -$0.55 -0.66%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/vnq

    U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note
    2.939 + 0.061%
    Last Updated: Sep 7, 2018 at 10:19 a.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd10y?countrycode=bx

    The odds of two .25% increases in the FF rate before year end have increased about 3% to 73.7%. The odds of a .25% increase later this month is at 99%.

    https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/countdown-to-fomc.html

    I have traded MPW on multiple occasions (trading profits currently at $1,395.2).

    I own 63+ shares with an average cost per share of $12.51. I quit reinvesting the dividends after the April 2018 payment.

    The last purchase was a 10 share lot bought at a TC of $12
    (2/6/18).

    Monday, February 12, 2018
    Item # 2.C.
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/02/observations-and-sample-of-recent_12.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. South Gent,

    Do you still have ZTR and VGI on your watchlist? Both are out of favor high yielding (with a portion of ROC in it) CEFs. While ZTR is at a premium to its NAV, VGI is at a discount.

    Do you have a view of these two CEF's in a rising interest environment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: I currently do not own either CEF.

      I am not a believer in a CEF consistently paying out in dividends more than it earns. The distributions made by ZTR have heavy ROC support. I do not view the CEF as worthy of a premium price to net asset value per share. Part of the recent performance is due to the market price rising from a discount to a significant premium to net asset value per share. If you look at a five year chart under the pricing information tab at CEF Connect, this CEF was selling at a 10% discount to NAV per share and then transitioned to a premium price this year. The double whammy for this CEF is when the price returns to a 10% discount and the net asset value per share is hammered by a correction or a bear market causing individual investors to sell.

      VGI has ROC support as well and is leveraged at close to 30%. There was a recent dividend cut. More can be expected to align earnings with the penny rate, assuming short term borrowing rates continue to move up which appears likely and the assets purchased with borrowed money go down in price.

      Individual investors are still chasing the shiny objects looking for yields.

      I have sold out of all leveraged CEFs except for GDO where I recently started a position using my small ball buying strategy. That is a term bond fund. Dividends have not been supported by ROC:

      Click Distribution Tab at
      https://www.cefconnect.com/fund/GDO

      You can pick up a decent dividend yield with ADX which I have bought and sold many times since 1984. Most of the distribution will be paid in December and sourced from long term capital gains. The managed distribution policy will currently require a 6% or greater dividend. The fund is unleveraged and that helped it survive the 1929 stock market crash. The distribution rate last year was at 9.8% mostly sourced from a year end long term capital gain distribution of $1.1 per share.

      http://www.adamsfunds.com/funds/diversified-equity/at-a-glance/

      So far this year, realized gains for the first 6 months was at $103+M. The fund then had $583+M in unrealized gains (note 2).

      Page 6:
      https://www.adamsfunds.com/wp-content/uploads/adx_q2_2018.pdf

      I do not currently own any shares. If I was going to buy either ZTR or ADX, and had to choose one, it would be ADX.

      Delete
    2. It is important to look at the most recent shareholder reports which are linked at CEFConnect.

      ZTR for the Period Ending on 5/31/18
      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/836412/000119312518242959/d588913dncsrs.htm


      I would first note that the fund was then sitting on a slight unrealized loss (page 25)

      I next noted the heavy ROC support for the dividends starting with 2015, the first year shown at page 32, line "return of capital" per share.

      I then looked to see how much was borrowed and the cost: page 43. Borrowing is at a short term Libor rate plus a spread and a commitment fee. "For the period ended May 31, 2018, the average daily borrowings under the Agreement and the weighted daily average interest rate were $109,172 and 2.575%, respectively"

      That cost is rising.

      Delete
  8. South Gent,

    Thank you for the quick response and your detailed roadmap for a CEF analysis.

    VGI is thinly traded (daily trading volume is under 100k) so I think its stock price is easily driven by a higher than usual trading volume, which is probably why it could swing from a 8.7% premium to a 9% discount between 52 Week High and 52 Week Low. But I am also puzzled that VGI has managed to lose almost 20% of its NAV in a year when the rising interest rate message is well telegraphed by the Fed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: I am not following it anymore. If you look at the holdings under "portfolio characteristics", the top individual holding is a sovereign bond issued by Turkey, with the next two top holdings being sovereign bonds from Kazakhstan and Argentina. Emerging market debt has been hit hard this year and those sovereign bonds would be at the top of the decliner's list. Then you have the problem connected with buying securities that go down in price with borrowed money which aggravates net asset value declines. The problem can become so severe, as it did during the Near Depression, that the leveraged CEF suffers a permanent loss in assets since it has to sell at the worst possible time to reduce its borrowings as required by its loan covenants.

      See Note 8 on borrowing costs:

      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1528811/000119312518242953/d561994dncsrs.htm

      The fund is sitting on a net unrealized loss: note 12 at page 41.

      ROC information is at page 28.

      Looking at the holdings, there is a lot of junk, close to 50%, and some lower quality investment grade bonds. My preservation of capital focus is steering me away from owning those kind of bonds individually.

      Overall, as shown by the total return number for the junk bond ETF JNK, this sector has been a dud over the past 5 years though there were trading opportunities in 2016. The yield spread between BBB+ and CCC+ rated bonds is not worth the credit risk which is one reason why I am not buying any junk bonds now.

      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=JNK&region=USA&culture=en_US

      There are times when junk bonds will outperform as they did in 2009, but that is after they were crushed in 2008. JNK had a total return of 50.78% in 2009 compared to -21.53 for the 20+ year treasury ETF TLT:

      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=TLT

      Delete
  9. South Gent,

    Thanks again. I was only thinking if these fund managers are just sitting in their nice office to lose investors' money. Incompetent or what? I will stay away. Sigh .....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: For leveraged bond CEFs, many of them are sitting on unrealized losses notwithstanding the bull market in bonds that started in 1982 and possibly ended in the 2012 summer. The overall total return in bonds, using a total bond market index fund as a proxy, have been positive since 2012, but the price gains of a total bond index fund like BND have not been worth an investment. The 5 year average annual total return for that broad ETF index fund was 2.52% as of last Friday.

      Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND)

      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=BND&region=USA&culture=en_US

      The problem with the unleveraged bond funds is that the distribution yield is so low and has been that way for about a decade now.

      A small loss in net asset value caused by a rise in rates or losses in the portfolio can easily wipe out one or two years of distributions.

      That is one reason why individual bond fund investors have turned to leveraged bond CEFs who could borrow short term money at near zero cost until recently and buy higher yielding bonds, thereby supporting a higher distribution than an unleveraged fund. That game is not looking so good now, which is why I dumped all of them, though I am nibbling on GDO now after jettisoning a large position.

      The fact that these leveraged bond funds may have loss carryforwards and/or unrealized losses now does not mean that they had realized capital gains when bonds were smoking and supported their distributions in that way.

      When looking at them, I would also recommend looking at whether the fund has a net loss carryforward which can be found in the note sections of semi-annual and annual reports.

      A net loss carryforward and an unrealized net loss together would be a bad sign. That would indicate to me poor management when the asset class is in a bull market or at least having positive total returns.

      Supporting a dividend with ROC is a form of asset destruction. Over time, the manager has less and less assets to generate income. How do you pay for a dividend that is not supported by earnings? Assets have to be sold with the proceeds distributed as dividends.

      VGI is not the worst performer among leveraged CEFs and has outperformed BND on a total return basis when looking at 3 and 5 year total returns. It is possible that I may become interested at some point when and if the discount expands over 15%; and I have some rational basis for believing that emerging market bonds and junk bonds are worth the risk. I do not view the yield spreads compared to BBB+ bonds to be attractive now. I made significant percentage returns buying junk bonds, primarily in the trust certificate legal form of ownership, after they were crushed in 2008.

      GYLD, discussed in this post, is unleveraged and has been in the wrong asset categories over the past five years as noted in my discussion. That has to do with the index being tracked. I thought that it was worth a nibble and maybe some small ball purchases down the road using commission free trades available to all Vanguard customers for that and other non-leveraged ETFs. However, I can not see yet on the horizon a turnaround in those asset categories.

      Delete
  10. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/09/observations-and-sample-of-recent_9.html

    ReplyDelete