In an earlier comment, I referenced my risk adjusted total return in my Schwab account. 11/12 comment.
The time period for that calculation, made by Schwab, was between 12/1/20 and 11/10/21.
The standard deviation was 1.84 compared to 2.61 for a "conservative" portfolio.
My return was calculated at 8.44% vs. the conservative portfolio at 4.25%.
A conservative portfolio is defined by Schwab as 50% Bloomberg Aggregate Bond, 30% 3 month Treasury bill; 15% S & P 500, 5% MSCI EAFE. That portfolio would generate almost no income.
As a conservative investor, I am just trying to earn a total return in excess of a conservative portfolio with less risk.
I do not need to take any risks to meet my financial goals so this kind of portfolio management is a compromise involving taking some risk in exchange for more income and total return potential compared to a risk free portfolio.
Schwab selected the preceding referenced time period as the default.
I changed the time period from 11/10/20 to 11/10/21, the last day currently available for selection. The SD increased to 2.03 with a 10.29% return compared to the conservative portfolio's SD at 2.58 and a 5.31% return.
This is the snapshot showing the data:
Success is defined as having the green box to the left of the circled number 5 and higher as well.
Snapshot of Portfolio Mix Definitions:
My Schwab portfolio will produce far more income than the conservative portfolio and most of my income will be from tax free municipal bonds or tax favored dividends and capital gains. The tax free yield for my municipal bonds owned in that account is close to 3% at cost. The current yield on a taxable aggregate bond fund is currently at 1.81%. AGG | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF Overview | MarketWatch So the after tax adjusted return would be meaningfully better than the conservative portfolio that generates almost entirely ordinary taxable income.

