Friday, January 27, 2017

Observations, Ruminations and Sample of Recent Trades (SGZA, NWHUF, CIOPRA, REXRPRA, ARESF): January 27, 2017/Trump and The New Alternate Reality Universe

Trump in ABC interview: Wall to be built within months, torture ‘absolutely’ works - MarketWatch (on torture, see Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture-absolutely did not work) 

Trump Threatens to Cancel Mexico Leader’s Visit Over Wall - Bloomberg (Mexico's President stated in a video speech once again that Mexico will never pay for the GOP's wall) 


Trump responded with a Tweet (foreign policy by Tweet is the New Normal):  "If Mexico is unwilling to pay for the badly needed wall, then it would be better to cancel the upcoming meeting." CNN 


Mexico's President of course cancelled the meeting with our Dear Leader. Mexican president cancels meeting with Trump - CBS News


In my life, I do not recall a single President, other than Trump, threaten to cancel a foreign leader's visa, unless that leader first agrees to U.S. demands. The GOP applauds this approach to diplomacy. The U.S.A is the Center of the Universe and All Countries Need to Dance to Out Tune or Else. 


A negotiation that starts with one side making a non-negotiable demand that is clearly unacceptable to the other is not a negotiation. 


Trump is a dogmatic and naturally authoritarian person who will not tolerate any criticism, no matter how inconsequential.  


And, without question IMO, he has zero interest in acquiring anything remotely resembling complete and accurate information before forming an opinion. He is the most dangerous person by far ever to be elected President.  


The Age of Alternate Facts is now upon us in full bloom, and it does have a Nineteen Eighty-Four feel to it, more than just a little bit.  


It is hardly surprising that his chief advisor, Steve Bannon, has told the free press to keep their "mouth shut". Trump Strategist Steve Bannon Says Media Should ‘Keep Its Mouth Shut’ - The New York Times The GOP has been trying to marginalize a free press for several decades as a source of accurate information in order to acquire and maintain power.


Mexico is the second largest importer of U.S. goods. (U.S. Census Bureau Data)


Trump calls U.S.-Mexico trade one-sided — and here’s the reality - MarketWatch


More Mexicans Leaving Than Coming to the U.S. | Pew Research Center (the reverse will occur when U.S. factories are forced to abandon their Mexican factories;  a wall will interfere with that migration back to Mexico; and a 2000 mile wall will be breached in numerous places continually)


After Mexico refused to voluntarily pay for the GOP's wall, Trump purportedly endorsed  "a 20 percent tax on  imports to the United States.  


The  funds collected "from Mexico" will be used to build the GOP's wall. After that proposal created a firestorm, the White House backtracked a little saying that was one option on the table.  


A tariff on goods is not collected from the country of course, but the Trump True Believers will swallow hook, line and sinker any Trump statement that Mexico is paying for the GOP's wall through a tariff, when in reality they are paying for it through higher prices and higher inflation.  It is far easier to go through life as an ignorant person, probably more blissful too since doubts never come into being and shades of gray are never seen. Being informed takes time, an open mind, and work.    


It does not bother me to pay more for imported goods, but perhaps a few Trump supporters will have a light bulb go off before the next election and will be less than pleased with the reality of who is paying for the wall. The Mexican government will not pay to build the GOP's wall.  


Those adverse consequences might even include the loss of their job when Mexico retaliates in kind. There is a rough form of justice that sometimes goes around. The top 1% do not have to worry since massive tax cuts are coming their way, and they certainly paid good money to the GOP for that result. Maybe something will trickle down to the blue collar middle class that voted for the Orange King in droves. 


Sure, Mexico's economy will be hurt more in a tariff trade war, given the relative size of the two economies and Mexico's greater dependence on the U.S. 


U.S. would lose jobs as well. The hurt will be on both sides.


Mexico would also likely end all cooperation on drug trafficking and counter-terrorism matters. Why bother to help the U.S. on those issues when the U.S. government is openly hostile to Mexico's interests? 


More important for the future, China and Russia may quickly develop closer trade ties with Mexico replacing the U.S. as Mexico's largest main trading partner. Chinese leaders are not stupid. They can readily see the openings (more than one) being created by Trump that advance their economic and political interests. 


Relations with several European nations will be damaged as well since their manufacturers have located plants in Mexico to serve the entire North America market for their products. Trump IMO is doing whatever he can to break up the EU into pieces, praising BREXIT and criticizing traditional allies that remain in the EU. (the latest: As May heads to U.S., Trump’s guy in Europe expresses deep pessimism - MarketWatch)


The Sun King Louis XIV would be proud of his soulmate the Orange King.   

When Obama issued Executive Orders, the republicans were up in arms and many renewed their talk about impeaching him and throwing him into the slammer. 

If Hillary had won, the GOP House of Representatives would have started impeachment proceedings as soon as her hand was lifted off the Bible. It is all about maintaining power for economic reasons anyway, democracy just gets in the way of the "right" result. Chants of "lock her up" were even heard at Trump's inaugural when her name was mentioned casually. ‘Lock her up!’ chant by Trump supporters against Clinton-The Washington Post 


It is far different when the Orange King issues Executive Orders that requires a great deal of borrowed money to spent. You will not hear a peep from the True Believers about the Executive Order to build  a wall along the 1,954 mile border with Mexico. Tens of millions (62.979+M to be precise) are cheering about that EO. It is only EO's issued by a Democrat that are unconstitutional. 


A copy of that EO  can be found at Quartz.


How exactly is Trump going to build that wall in months? Will Congress be called upon the vote on any legislation and appropriations relating to that construction and the roughly $500M per year maintenance. 


Pooh on those elected representatives.  The Orange King has spoken. Build that Wall or pay the consequences.


The GOP believes that they have found a way around the Senate Democrats use of a filibuster. 


The idea is to fund the construction, which Mexico will later reimburse us for certain according to our Great Leader, under an existing piece of legislation called the Secure Fence Act of 2006: Text - H.R.6061 - 109th Congress (2005-2006): Secure Fence Act of 2006 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress


By 2009, the U.S. built 613 miles of fencing under that Act, but Congress thereafter failed to pass legislation to fund additional construction.


The Secure Fence Act of 2006 would be a Congressional authorization to finish the fence, provided the GOP can find a way to fund that construction without allowing the Senate Democrats to filibuster, but there is a major legal problem in following that path.


That law requires the Department of Homeland Security to find that the construction is "necessary and proper" (clause A).


In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court held in MICHIGAN v. EPA (J.Scalia) that "necessary and proper" language in the Clear Air Act required that agency to perform a cost/benefit analysis first. It is not enough that the agency find that the action is "necessary".


In a matter of weeks, Trump will find out more about the U.S. legal system and how opposition groups and their competent lawyers can throw monkey wrenches into his plans.


There will be a lawsuit filed that will require a cost/benefit analysis to be performed before any additional fencing is built. The Democrats will select a friendly Federal District Court in a friendly Appellate court district as the GOP has done in the past as well. If the lower courts follow the Michigan decision, and they have no choice in the matter, an injunction would be issued against the government until that study is completed and then there will be court challenges as to its sufficiency.


There is already a large body of evidence that the existing border wall has not been effective. People go under and over it.


Trump's immigration tab: $166 billion - POLITICO


As Donald Trump Calls for Wall on Mexican Border, Smugglers Dig Tunnels - The New York Times


What's More Effective Than a Wall on the Border? | The Report | US News and World Report


Feds Frustrated by Illegal Immigrants Passing Through Holes in New Border Fence | Fox News


Trump’s dubious claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion - The Washington Post (probably the same kind of cost estimate that Bush and Cheney gave us prior to launching the Iraq Invasion). 

The cost benefit analysis will not be decided by Trump signing an Executive Order where he orders the wall to be built.

  
I wonder what Trump would say about a judge that dares to defy him.  

We already know that he attacked a judge of Mexican descent when rulings in that Trump University fraud cause did not go his way. And that was a fraud by the way.



++++


Trump says he is an environmentalist and claims to have won many environmental awards


Trump’s unsupported claim he has ‘received awards on the environment’ - The Washington Post;


Donald Trump Says He’s “An Environmentalist,” Promptly Announces Plans to Destroy the Environment | Vanity Fair


So far, no one has been able to locate one of those rewards.


Has it occurred to anyone that Trump is unequivocally delusional? 


Trump has found several ways to protect the environment from pollution. 


He has appointed an anti-EPA person as the EPA's Administrator, gagged the EPA's employees, blocked the EPA's new research efforts, approved two new oil pipelines, and held out a carrot to the U.S. automakers that will allow them to pollute the air more in exchange for more U.S. jobs. We are now officially in an Alternate Universe where Reality Creations or Alternate Facts are the New Normal.


If Trump wants to adopt policies that will create a few more jobs in exchange for substantially more actual and potential pollution, then he needs to at least drop his asinine claim of being an environmentalist and to accept that he is precisely the opposite.  


He will not do so since the True Believers will never question any assertion made by the Great Leader. Truth is no longer relevant. Accurate information is per se false when it calls into question reality creations. 


In case there are any super models who regularly read this blog, and want to know more about the OLD GEEZER, he used to # play shortstop for the New York Yankees, regularly runs five miles a day in just twenty minutes and performs a warm up exercise each morning of 300 push-ups with each arm to keep his slim and muscular body in top physical condition for a man of his age-just 21 by the way, and has so much hair on the top of his head that he regularly donates some to those less fortunate.  Oh, forgot to mention, the OG won the Nobel Prize in Economics for his groundbreaking work titled "Efficient Markets Theory as BullShit: How True Believers and RBs Influence Irrational Pricing in Stock Prices"   ( # ALTERNATE FACTS )


++++++++++++


I may to cut back on my Trump, Pseudo Conservative and True Believer comments to avoid getting kneecapped on my way to the mailbox or having the full power of the U.S. government, which is no longer constrained or restrained by facts, unleashed on me. The GOP is not a conservative party. 


Trump has used litigation as a means to bully and browbeat others into submission and to avoid paying what he owes to small firms and blue collar workers according to many news reports. 


USA TODAY exclusive: Hundreds allege Donald Trump doesn’t pay his bills;


Dozens of lawsuits accuse Trump of not paying his bills, reports claim | Fox News;


Donald Trump Has a History of Not Paying His Bills. That Offers Some Insights Into His Personality;


Donald J. Trump Is A Libel Bully But Also A Libel Loser,


Fearing Trump, Bar Association Stifles Report Calling Him a ‘Libel Bully’ - The New York Times;


How ‘thin-skinned’ Donald Trump uses insults, threats and lawsuits to quiet critics - The Washington Post;


Rule of Trump vs. Rule of Law - The Washington Post;


The Miss USA hopeful sued by Trump: 'There are ways to stand your ground' | US news | The GuardianTrump used $258,000 from his charity to settle legal problems - The Portland Press Herald;


New York Times responds to Trump's lawsuit threat | PBS NewsHour


Donald Trump says he'll sue sexual misconduct accusers - CNNPolitics.com


Trump voters and supporters have no concerns. I do. 


Trump now has the full power of the federal government behind him and sycophants willing to do his bidding without questions or reservations. The reactionary
Jeff Sessions as the attorney general does not alleviate my concerns. Did Jeff Sessions forget about how he wanted to execute pot dealers? It is for the best to have a foggy memory about repeatedly calling a black  "boy". His memory losses are a matter of convenience.

It is precisely those kind of reports from a free press that need to be stifled, suppressed or at a minimum completely ignored in what is now a Pavlovian response to accurate information by tens of millions.


I was only half serious about being kneecapped by a Trump Acolyte,  since I doubt that the True Believers read my blog. 


At the White House's website, there are two "We the People" petitions that one or two readers may view as worthwhile signing. 


One calls for Trump to release his tax returns in order to comply with the Constitution's Emolument Clause. What is the ‘Emoluments Clause’? Does it apply to President Trump? - The Washington Post 


The other calls for Trump to divest his business interests or place them in a blind trust. He will of course ignore both. 


He never had any attention to release his tax returns. There are many likely reasons, and none are positive, including what I suspect to be a total lack of charitable giving, the use of offshore accounts, business ties with less than pleasant foreign countries and individuals, and the failure to pay taxes after losing a billion dollars when he actually tried to operate businesses rather than making boatloads of cash licensing his name.  



Petition the White House on the Issues that Matter to You | We the People: Your Voice in Our Government


Trump Made No Donations To 9/11 Charities | The Smoking Gun


Donald Trump may have lied about donating to 9/11 charities - NY Daily News



++++++


Trump's Press Secretary Sean Spicer, now called here at HQ the "Alternate Facts Guy", claimed that it was necessary to freeze federal employment due to their the "dramatic expansion in the federal workforce". 


That claim was rated "mostly false" by PolitiFact.


During Obama's 8 year administration, the number of federal employees grew from 2.78M to 2.8M or about 1% in 8 years. The use of the word "Dramatic" to describe that increase is a deliberate lie.


The Trump administration just told a whopper about the size of the federal workforce - The Washington Post


It is probably safe to assume that the Alternate Facts Guy is lying whenever his mouth appears to be moving, unless proven otherwise by real facts as opposed to his abundant reality creations told with an earnest face. The press should just laugh at him. Better to laugh than cry as my grandma use to say. 


++++++++++++++


Reduction in Stock Allocation Is Now In Progress 


I do not believe the stock market is correctly assessing the risks of a Trump presidency including the repercussions of his protectionist policies. From a geopolitical standpoint, he is providing important openings for China and Russia in both the Asia-Pacific region and in Mexico and possibly other Latin American countries as well who will react negatively when the U.S. wields its Big Stick to beat one or more of them into submission.


I am starting to sell into the current parabolic stock rally that is based on a belief, expressed with 100% certainty, that Trump's policies will in fact turbocharge the U.S. economy for many years to come.


As I noted earlier, I would lighten up on my stock allocations based on current valuations and my capital preservation focus anyway.


I will invariably sell into parabolic price spikes anyway.


The market has been good to me since March 2009. I have no financial need to push the envelope further.


As in 2007, most of the stock allocation reduction will be done first in U.S. stock funds.


The stock fund slash actually started in late 2006 and continued for about a year. I generally take my time but may be quicker than usual now.  


I will not sell any shares in T. Rowe Price stock funds as previously discussed which by itself maintains a meaningful allocation to U.S. stocks.


I will continue to maintain meaningful stock exposure in Vanguard mutual funds, but at a significantly lower level than now.   

The largest existing fund position is over $50K in the Vanguard Equity Income Fund-Admiral Class (VEIRX). I bought that position for my mother back in the early 1990s and I inherited it when she passed away in December 2015. 


The cost basis was stepped up to the price as of her DOD, so all of the profit from the original purchases will not be taxed up to that stepped up cost basis  when I sell shares.

As noted in previous comments, I have already pared the position by $9K late last year and will continue paring in $3K increments. I will stop paring when the market goes down meaningfully. A bear market decline (> 20%) that takes the S & P 500 below 2000 will probably result in a return to dividend reinvestment and small adds spaced in time. 

VEIRX Vanguard Equity-Income Admiral Fund VEIRX (rated 5 stars by Morningstar). 

I may eliminate my vintage position in the Vanguard STAR (VGSTX) due to valuation and risk concerns involving both stocks and bonds. So far, I have only sold a few shares purchased with reinvested dividends. I initiated a position in that fund in 2009, along with several others, when I rotated out of cash and short term bonds into stocks and longer term bonds. 2. Pared Highest Cost Vanguard Star Fund shares Bought With DIVIDENDS: Update For Portfolio Management And Positioning As Of 10/24/15 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha   

I will not be including snapshots of the profits here since that would be misleading given the stepped-up cost basis. I will simply note that I have pared again by $3K.  

I am turning off the reinvestment option in all Vanguard stocks funds as I have already done with the T. Rowe Price funds.


Stock CEFs will probably be the first funds that will be jettisoned.


I will discuss some of those stock fund dispositions in the next blog. I mentioned in the last blog paring ADX. 


When I start this paring process, the first to go will be recently bought fund shares, selling at whatever profit is then available. Those shares were bought deep into a long bull market cycle, the second longest in history without a 20+% decline. 


11/16/16 Article: Why the 2,826-Day-Old Bull Market Could Be a Headache for Trump - Bloomberg (add more days to date)


I believe the longest run ever without a 20% correction started after the 1987 crash and ended with the 1990 bear market.  


It has also been a long time by historical standards since the last recession. nber.org/cycles The last one officially ended in June 2009. It is possible that the slower than normal recovery from a recession has prolonged the business cycle. The slower recovery was expected by me and others due to the conditions that caused the last downturn compared to a garden variety U.S. recession where housing and automobile sales lead an economic burst out of a relatively short term slowdown that lacks far reaching implications. Recoveries from financial meltdowns take much longer. Recovery from Financial Crises: Evidence from 100 Episodes (Reinhart and Rogoff/Harvard University)


++++++++++++++


Reduction of Potentially Long Duration Bond and Preferred Stocks Is In Progress But Slowing to A Trickle For the Time Being


Inflationary pressures are already building in the economy. I do believe that Trump and the republican Congress will add to those pressures through their trade policies, tax cuts and increases in federal spending. The Border Tax would add to inflationary pressures as would more specifically targeted tariffs for countries currently paying zero or close to it.


Until there is more clarity, I want to heavily weight my bond allocation in short term bonds and CDs.


An interest rate spike, greater than currently anticipated, in the short and intermediate term maturities would be an important consideration for buying more of the same as those short term instruments mature and pay off. That likelihood would increase with a dicey Big Picture environment where I view the risk of other asset classes to outweigh the potential rewards taking into account my capital preservation goal with income being the secondary objective.


++++++++


Vanguard Accounts: Treasury Bills/Low Yielding Short Term Bonds vs. Vanguard Prime Money Market: 

The Vanguard Prime Money Market fund is back up to a .79% yield as of 1/26/17: Vanguard - Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund The yield will likely go over 1% when the FED raises the FF rate by .25%, probably in the summer IMO.

In my taxable account, I bought $5K in treasury bills at auction that will mature soon. I will not roll them over. The MM fund will provide me with a higher short term yield.

I also see no reason to buy short term corporate bonds in my Vanguard accounts for the same reason.

Those purchases are concentrated in two taxable accounts where the brokerage companies pay next to nothing for idle cash: Schwab and Fidelity.

Fidelity money market funds have always had higher expense ratios than Vanguard.  The Vanguard Prime has a .16% expense ratio while the Fidelity Government MM Fund, one of the two funds now available to individual customers, has a .42% expense ratio and invests in lower yielding securities. The result is an acceptable in the current environment .17% yield.  SPAXX - Fidelity ® Government Money Market Fund | Fidelity Investments


+++++++++++


1.  Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy: 

A. Bought 1 Kraft Heinz Food 2% Senior Unsecured Bond Maturing on 7/2/18:

Vanguard Roth IRA Account: Commission $2 Per Bond 




FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked at Finra page)

YTM at Total Cost (100.4) = 1.716% 

At least the income is tax free when paid into the ROTH IRA. 

Moody's RatingBaa3 (04/25/2016)
Standard & Poor's RatingBBB- (06/16/2015)
Fitch RatingBBB- (09/27/2016)



B. Bought 2 WFC 1.4% CDs (monthly interest payments) Maturing on 8/1/18. 

C. Bought 2 Bank of North Carolina (BNCN) .7% CDs (monthly interest payments) Maturing on 7/31/17 


Pinnacle Financial Partners Announces Agreement to Acquire BNC Bancorp (parent of Bank of North Carolina)


Pinnacle is the second largest bank based in Tennessee. 


D. U.S. Treasury .625% Maturing on 9/30/17


A. Bought Roth IRA: 1 TIP 2.375% Coupon Maturing on 1/15/2027 at 118.9844



Real Yield = .428

Inflation Factor: 1.19729
Adjusted Principal Value: $1,189.8438 (up from the original par value of $1K)
Premium to Adjusted Principal Value = $234.75

This TIP was originally sold in January 2007. 

I had to pay up to buy a 2.375% coupon ten year TIP. 


The 2.375% coupon is paid on the current adjusted principal amount of $1,189.8438 (as of 1/23/17) that will be adjusted further by future CPI numbers.    


Real yields on the 10 Year TIP were much better in 2007 than now and were even negative for almost two years back in 2011-2013: 





Real Yields: 10-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Security- St. Louis Fed


Stocks, Bonds & Politics: TIP Trading in the Secondary Market


Update On Buying TIPs In The Secondary Market - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


The Mechanics Of Purchasing A TIP In The Secondary Market - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Advantages and Disadvantages of Treasury Inflation Protected Securities 


I sold into the negative yield prices viewing that period as the bond market equivalent to stocks in 1999.  

3. Continued Paring Recently Bought, Potentially Perpetual and Low Yielding Fixed Coupon Equity Preferred Stocks

Both of the securities referenced in this section are REIT equity preferred stocks that pay cumulative and non-qualified dividends on a $25 par value.  Both were recently issued in IPOs and proceeded to decline significantly in price when interest rates continued moving up last year. 



Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity REIT Cumulative Equity Preferred Stocks (profit snapshots at the end)


A. Sold 50 CIOPRA  at $25.21




Profit Snapshot: +$146.97





Quote: City Office REIT Inc. 6.625% Cumulative Preferred Series A Stock (CIO.PA)


Prospectus Supplement


I did receive the quarterly dividend that went ex on 1/11/17 bringing my total return to $172.27 or 15.49% in less than two months. 





CIO.PA Stock Chart 


B. Sold 50 REXRPRA at $23.2





Profit Snapshot +$17.97





Quote: Rexford Industrial Realty Inc. 5.875% Cumulative Preferred Series A Stock (REXR.PA)


REXR.PA Chart  


Prospectus


I did own this stock long enough to harvest one quarterly dividend:





That was the first dividend and covered more than 3 months as I recall. I did not double check that recall.


I will consider buying back any fixed coupon preferred stock that I have sold when the price is lower than my last purchase price.  


Needless to say, I am playing small ball here. I anticipate another downdraft in price relatively soon.   


4. Continued Paring Recently Bought Potentially Long Duration Exchange Traded Bonds


A. Sold 50 of 160 SGZA at $25.14


This senior unsecured exchange traded bond matures in 2043, but the issuer Selective Insurance has the option to call at the $25 par value on or after 2/2/18. Prospectus (asymmetric interest rate risk in favor of the issuer)


Quote:  Selective Insurance Group Inc. 5.875% Senior Notes due 2043 (SGZA)


SGZA Stock Chart 






I selected to sell the highest cost lot bought in my Schwab taxable account: 




In this particular taxable account, I now own 50 shares bought at $23.53. I will consider buying back the lot sold at $25.14 when and if the price is below $23. 


Profit Snapshot:   +$38.26





Moody's rate Selective's senior unsecured debt at Baa2.  

Fitch has a BBB+ rating. 

3rd Quarter Earnings Report  Selective Insurance SEC Filings


During the interest rate spike in 2013, and to highlight again the interest rate risk in these potentially long duration bonds, I bought SGZA at $20.6 in October 2013 (Item # 3 Snapshot). I sold that lot to quickly on 5/1/14: Item # 4 Sold 50 SGZA at $23.73 (realized gain snapshot= $140.58)


I am anticipating that rates will trend up this year throughout the maturity spectrum. I suspect that will be one or more rallies based on a flight to quality, possibly resulting from one or more actions by our new President. Talk is no longer likely to spur that kind of movement as investors adjust to the Trump's loose mouth and frequently bizarre statements.


5.  Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy


All of my Canadian REITs make monthly distributions and go ex on the same day which was today for January's distribution. The dividends are paid on the 15th day of the following month. 

A. Bought 100 NWHUF at USD $7.72: 


NWHUF is the USD priced ordinary shares of Northwest Healthcare Properties. a Canadian REIT that owns healthcare properties worldwide in Canada and several foreign countries. 


Home - NorthWest Healthcare Properties


Dividends (more appropriately called distributions): Northwest is currently paying a monthly dividend of C$.06667 per share or C$.80 annually. At a total cost per share of C$10.15, the dividend yield would be about 7.89%. The dividend yield for the NWHUF owners before taxes will depend on the conversion rate into USDs.   


NWHUF trades in the U.S. Grey Market which is a Dark Market with no bid and ask prices displayed by most brokers. Normally I do not trade in that market. 


A symbol that ends in the letter "F" denotes that the investor is buying the ordinary shares priced in USDs rather than an ADR. 


I bought this 100 unit lot in my Schwab account using a commission free trade. 


For Canadian stocks traded in the U.S. Grey Market, Schwab will display for Grey Market listed stocks the trading activity in Toronto, including the volume, bid and ask prices, but the bid and ask quotes will be converted into USDs rather than expressed in CADs. 


The volume will be for the ordinary shares traded in Toronto rather than the Grey Market. It is consequently easier to trade Grey Market securities at Schwab than at my other brokers. 


Nonetheless, I converted manually the CAD price into USDs to double check Schwab's conversion price, and it was accurate. 


Only 566 shares traded in the Grey Market on 1/24/17, the day of purchase. There is a major liquidity issue in the Grey Market for this security. 


The ordinary shares priced in CADs had volume of 795,187: 


Northwest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (NWH.UN:TOR) 

Closing Price 1/24/17:  C$10.15 -C$.3 or 2.87%

The price declined due to a share ("unit") offering: NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust Announces $75 Million Bought Deal of Trust Units


The units were sold at C$10.1. 


I currently own 1,200 Northwest Healthcare Property REIT units that were bought in Toronto. My last two discussion in blog posts can be found here: 


1. Added 100 NWN.UN at C$9.58: Update For Equity REIT Basket Strategy As Of 5/5/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


Bought 300 NWN.UN at C$ 7.68 Update For Equity REIT Basket Strategy As Of 7/24/15 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


I also discussed a purchase in my Comment Blog # 6 (on 12/4/2016 at 11:06 A.M. discussing a purchase at C$9.6).  


NWHUF is identical to those units except the price is expressed in USDs, the distributions will be paid in USDs after a conversion from CADs, the security is traded on a U.S. exchange rather than in Toronto, and transactions are settled in USDs rather than CADs. The NWHUF price will be the CAD price converted into USDs at the time of the trade or close to it. Occasionally, there are differentials in the prices due to one or more factors (change in conversion rate after a market closes, uninformed individuals placing trades without limit orders in the Grey Market, etc.).  



Trade snapshot: 



Conversion of Ordinary Units Priced in CADs into USDs: 





Three Year Price Chart Comparison: 





NWH.UN Stock Chart


The ordinary shares priced in CADs started to outperform the ordinary shares priced in USDs in mid-2014 when the CAD started to lose value against the USD. The 15% or so difference in favor of the CAD priced shares reflects the decline in the CAD/USD exchange rate. The reverse will happen when the USD declines in value against the CAD which was the case on 1/24/17. The ordinary shares traded in Toronto declined by 2.87% while the Grey Market shares dropped 2.28%.


As noted many times previously, the sideal scenario now would be for the ordinary shares priced in CADs to gain value as the CAD increases in value against the USD.


If 1 CAD bought 1 USD today, then NWHUF would have closed at $10.15, the same closing price as the Toronto listed shares rather than at $7.72. That currency change would result in a 31.48% increase in the NWHUF price with no change from today's closing price in Toronto.


The value of the dividends converted into USDs and consequently the dividend yield at a constant cost basis would go up when the CAD gains value against the USD after purchase. And, since there is balance, the dividend yield would go down where where it was at the time of purchase with the CAD/USD declining.


Last Earnings Report for the 2016 Third Quarter: 



The number of units outstanding has increased substantially due to acquisitions and public share offerings.  


NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Provides Portfolio Update Reflecting Continued International Growth


NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Successfully Completes Brazil Hospital Acquisition 


NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Executes on $145 Million of Brazil Hospital Acquisitions (July 2016)


NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Announces Successful Completion of Public Offering of Trust Units and Convertible Debentures for Aggregate Gross Proceeds of $146 Million (July 2016)


NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT announces acquisition of strategic interest and management rights to ASX Listed Generation Healthcare REIT (Generation Healthcare is an Australian REIT that exclusively invests in healthcare properties, Generation Healthcare REIT)

Northwest Healthcare Properties REIT Announces $100 Million Bought Deal Financing to Support $325 Million of Accretive International Acquisitions (July 2016)

NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Provides Update on Vital Healthcare Property (June 2016)

NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Announces Exercise of Over-Allotment Option in Connection with Recent Equity Offering For $80 Million in Aggregate Proceeds (April 2016)

NorthWest Healthcare Properties REIT Completes Acquisition of German Medical Office Building (April 2016).

 Etc. and So on

Northwest was a small REIT when I first bought shares and is growing fast through acquisitions financed in part by public unit and convertible bond offerings. There is always a danger that this kind of spree can end badly. It can also end up being a worthwhile transition to a much larger business. The acquisitions in Brazil are potentially riskier than the ones in Germany and Australia. Hard to say, but we do have a very long history of capital confiscation by Latin American countries. Countries like Argentina and Venezuela are just the worst examples.  

B. Added 50 ARESF at $9.5 (using commission free trade):




ARESF is the USD priced ordinary shares of the Canadian REIT Artis Real Estate Investment Trust (AX.UN:TOR).


Website: Artis REIT 


The shares are traded on the U.S. pink sheet exchange which displays bid and ask quotes. The liquidity is minimal for this security on that U.S. exchange however.


The CAD priced shares closed at C$12.45 on 1/25/17.




The same currency risk  issues discussed above equally apply to this security as reflected in a three year comparison chart:




And, as discussed above, the currency risk can turn into a currency conversion benefit when the CAD goes up in value against the USD. 


I have not had much luck with Artis since I sold a 300 share lot in Toronto back in 2014:  


Canadian REITs have significantly underperformed U.S. REITs since mid-2014 as shown in this 3 year chart comparing a Canadian REIT ETF with the Vanguard REIT ETF:
Stocks, Bonds & Politics: SOLD 300 AX-UN:CA at C$15.71 (9/26/14 Post)



Artis does have significant property exposure in Alberta which has not helped since June 2014, but maybe that cloud is lifting now slowly. Portfolio Map  As shown by that map, Artis has a significant presence in the U.S. 


Artis has maintained a monthly dividend of $.09 per unit for a long time. Distribution History I do not anticipate, based on what I know now, either a dividend raise or cut within the next two years. 


Using a C$12.45 unit price, that works out to about a 8.67% yield. The yield to owners of ARESF will vary with the exchange rate, up and down.    


There is nothing exciting about the recent earnings report due in large part to the downdraft in Alberta's economy caused by the crude oil price collapse in 2014-2016. 


Quarterly Reports 


I was going to read the latest report in French but decided that my foreign language skills have become rusty through disuse aggravated by a failure to learn one. 




Artis Real Estate Investment Trust Announces Disposition of Eight Industrial Properties and One Retail Property in Alberta (10/4/16)



+++++


At the start of this post, I referenced a statement by our Great Leader that torture works and it is okay for the U.S. to engage in torture. Those who conducted torture at the CIA claim that torture worked as do many republican representatives of course who voted against the Senate Intelligence Committee's finding to the contrary. I would suggest that one be skeptical of a claim by the torturer that torture works.  


The same CIA believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, relying in part on a guy named Joe who had no expertise in gas centrifuges to enrich uranium but who was certain that aluminum tubes confiscated in Jordan were intended for such use, notwithstanding the contrary opinions of our nation's leading gas centrifuge experts at Oak Ridge. Joe's opinion fell neatly in line with what the Executive Branch want to do so pooh on our leading experts at Oak Ridge. 


Depiction of Threat Outgrew Supporting Evidence ("Gas centrifuge experts consulted by the U.S. government said repeatedly for more than a year that the aluminum tubes were not suitable or intended for uranium enrichment", and how many Americans knew about that fact even now-very few). 


Then the CIA relied on the ramblings of a known alcoholic that German intelligence had named Curveball and a patently forged document from Niger about Iraq's interest in acquiring yellow cake. Curveball has admitted that he made everything up.'Curveball': I lied about WMD to hasten Iraq war- NBC NewsMan whose WMD lies led to 100,000 deaths confesses all | The Independent


The Niger forgeries were possibly produced by two CIA officers in cooperation with Ahmad Chalabi, and then funneled to the U.S. government through a cooperating person in the Italian intelligence service in what is generally called a black-propaganda operation. Niger uranium forgeries - WikipediaYellowcake Uranium | Vanity Fair

So, I do not entirely disagree with Trump that the CIA's opinions are always based on reality, and perhaps Donald needs to listen more to McCain about torture rather than to the agency that committed the torture.  


+++

The most extreme reactionary among Trump's appointments to date is probably Mike Mulvaney who will be the new OMB director. He voted against providing relief after Hurricane Sandy and wanted to keep the government shutdown until the Democrats agreed to defund Planned Parenthood. An Extremist Holding the Purse Strings - The New York Times

I would agree with this commentator that the GOP is not even close to being a Conservative party, but I have been making that same point here for years: 

Stop calling the party of Donald Trump “conservative”: It’s a party of dangerous, destructive reactionaries - Salon.com

Perhaps some will wake up to that fact when the GOP replaces traditional Medicare with a voucher system that bankrupts the middle class in their retirement years and requires them to knock on their kids door for a place to stay (or something similarly onerous on them in exchange for more tax cuts for the top 1%). Just move the kids into one bedroom so Mom and Dad have a place to stay. Maybe Mom will grow some crops in the back yard to feed the family.  

GOP's Plan To Bankrupt the Middle Class (7/15/11 Post)

You have to have your eyes open to see it. 

I discussed in the last post how GOP constitutional orthodoxy, now nearing control over the Supreme Court, will limit the federal government's power to pass laws using the Commerce Clause and gradually return the clock back to early 20th Century and late 19th Century jurisprudence that will repeal or emasculate many progressive laws passed over the past 120 years. Donald Trump and the Beginning of the End of the Progressive Era

The liberals really do not understand-yet-the far reaching repercussions that go beyond the hot button social issues and extends into potential roll backs in civil rights, environmental protection, labor laws, consumer protection, etc. types of federal legislation. Let's see what happens in the next 20 years. 


Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Observations and Sample Trades (VIVHY, ADX, HTGZ): January 24, 2017/Donald Trump and the Beginning of the End of the Progressive Era

Jim Rogers believes that investors need to sell stock when and if Trump starts a trade war. 


The market's valuation is moving quickly toward levels, even without that kind of folly, where I would start to reduce my stock allocation anyway. 

As noted in a prior comment, Trump reinforced his call for protectionist policies in his inaugural address, as he did throughout the campaign.  


This is what he said in that speech: 


"Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families. We must protect our borders from the ravages of other countries making our products, stealing our companies and destroying our jobs. Protection will lead to great prosperity and strength. "


Transcript And Analysis: President Trump's Inauguration Speech : NPR

AP fact check: Trump's inaugural speech | PBS NewsHour
President Trump’s Inaugural Address: FactCheck.org

The stock market clearly assigns a zero per cent chance to Trump initiating a protectionist policies that inevitably precipitate a trade war as other nations reciprocate. The Stocks Jocks, CEOs and money managers, mostly Trump supporters, see nothing but blue skies ahead. Economic nirvana is just around the corner.

The odds are clearly higher than zero that Trump will start a trade war and will cause significant disruptions in important U.S. industry sectors that may cause a recession or an economic slowdown.

IMO, adjustments need to be made to more clearly reflect the odds as being significantly higher than the market's belief that the Rational Man will finally ooze out of the Orange King as Byron Wein recently asserted here: Byron Wien: Trump Will Pivot to Moderate Stance - Barron's

+++

Like the Sun King Louis XIV, the Orange King enjoys ornate palaces and allegedly a "string of" women other than his wife. The Sun King gave himself that title since he was never wrong, not even once in his 72 year reign. 

I wonder when Trump is going to initiate all of those libel suits against the women who claimed, prior to the election, that Trump made unwanted sexual advances. Donald Trump says he'll sue sexual misconduct accusers - CNNPolitics.com I would like to be a fly on the wall when his deposition is taken. Let me know when he files his lawsuits in case I miss the news.


Bear with me. I am going to show how this relates back to investing. 


I wonder whatever happened to that gold platted wastepaper basket that Denis Kozlowski bought with Tyco shareholder money. I bet it is in the Oval Office now. 


The Orange King likes gold so very much. Inside Donald's Mansion The color goes so well with his hair and makes that hairdo sparkle with radiance.  


Upon seeing the robust use of gold as a decoration inside Donald's home, the resemblance to the Sun King's Versailles Palace quickly came to mind. I could not help it. The comparison just immediately popped into my brain mush.  


Maybe gold is moving up some in price over the past few weeks as more investors realize that the White House, soon to be rebranded with a different name more  to Donald's liking, will be platted in 24K gold on both the exterior and the interior. 


The movement toward gold platted umbrella holders, waste paper baskets, refrigerators and toilets may then become such an inextricable part of the really powerful Trump movement that gold prices soar over $3K per ounce. 


I own some gold bullion, but view it as unlikely that I will plate my toilets with the stuff. Maybe some gold threads in my clothes or some 24K gold pant's zippers is doable or a gold plate on the top of my head where hair use to be. 


+++++++++++++


Perhaps someone needs to inform Jim Acosta to think twice before asking Trump a question again at a news conference, unless he wants to be shackled and chained and then taken to the soon to be built Washington Tower for future disposition. Trump shuts down CNN reporter  


Trump is not a First Amendment lover in practice, which is not unusual anymore in the U.S. Just ignore the lip service to the conservative values expressed in that Constitutional Amendment when a person's actions speak louder than the words.

+++++++++++++

One of the Orange King's first proclamations was to increase FHA insurance premiums for homeowners by about $500 per year. Trump already suspends Obama-era FHA mortgage insurance cut - MarketWatchFHA mortgage insurance premium cuts cancelled by President Trump - CBS News

That increase is part of his plan to make America Great Again and to do everything within his power to help the white voters with high school educations who are responsible for his ascension. 


("Trump did best among white voters without a college degree, beating Clinton by the enormous margin of 72 percent to 23 percent." CBS News)  


Do not be concerned about decreases in their disposable income that can no longer be spent to support a consumer led economy. 


Under Trump's current tax plan, there would be about $560 per year tax cut for a family earning $40-$50K, offsetting that other increase. 


There is a caveat however. 


About 8 million middle class families would suffer a tax increase: Trump would hike taxes for some in middle class (US Today)  


That statistic is dismissed of course as left-wing propaganda and lies circulated by the mainstream media and the non-partisan Tax Policy Center who ran the numbers. 


What Is Donald Trump's Tax Plan? An Analysis Of Whom It Will Benefit : NPR ("A single parent who's earning $75,000 and has two school-age children, they would face a tax increase of over $2,400") 

Somebody needs to up their contributions to our destitute Uncle Same to offset my meaningful tax cut after all. 


Might as well be a single parent with two small children to raise. 


To help out with expenses,  those two kids can get a job or two between 3:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. every day just like in the old days. 


My maternal grandmother and grandfather had to quit after the 8th grade to help on the farm. Back to 1900, sound's like a good political slogan when honesty is used to coin it.    


Might as well repeal those pesky child labor laws just in case some liberal complains. 


We may soon have a anti-labor Labor Secretary who would fit just fine into late 19th and early 20th Century national labor policies and laws, so that repeal is only a tiny additional step to make. 


5 reasons the Senate must reject Andrew Puzder as Labor secretary | TheHill

Andrew Puzder’s shady history: Trump’s labor secretary nominee is a habitual violator of labor law - Salon.com

And, it may be possible to get rid of those laws even without congressional legislation. The Senate Democrats might prevent their repeal through a filibuster designed to further their creeping socialist agenda. 



When the Supreme Court is packed for the next two or three decades with members of the The Federalist Society, then the judicial ideology expressed in the 1918 Supreme Court decision in Hammer v. Dagenhart will likely be resurrected in substantial ways. That decision was decided by a 5 to 4 vote with Republicans providing 4 of the 5 votes. The other vote was a kindred spirit who was appointed by Woodrow Wilson. 

The Hammer decision and many others like it are consistent with the dominant historical theme of GOP constitutional law philosophy. That decision held that a federal child labor law was unconstitutional.  


The particular law in question was the Keating-Owen Child Labor Act of 1916. ("banned the sale of products from any factory, shop, or cannery that employed children under the age of 14, from any mine that employed children under the age of 16, and from any facility that had children under the age of 16 work at night or for more than 8 hours during the day.")


In the coming years, the Supreme Court will be gradually moving back toward the Lochner era in Constitutional jurisprudence and a far more narrower interpretation of the Constitution's Commerce Clause as a means to limit federal government power to promulgate laws and regulations. Both are part of long standing GOP legal dogma over the past 130+ years, which is one of the two dominant legal strains in U.S. Constitutional jurisprudence IMO. This kind of issue is explored in laymen's terms in Jeffrey Toobin's book titled The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (partial excerpt at CNN.com)


Progressives have been under the false impression that these issues were resolved 80+ years ago, but that is not the case.

The general idea is to have the Supreme Court do the heavy lifting by gradually pecking away at the constitutionality of all progressive legislation passed over the past 125 years. Inroads have already been made and will likely accelerate when Trump appoints his second Justice. Then the republican representatives can shrug their shoulders and say that they do not agree with every decision striking down a law on constitutional grounds, but what can Congress do about it.

Liberals are focusing on abortion (Roe v. Wade) and gay marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges) decisions that are likely to be reversed or gutted when one of the liberals pass away, which I view as likely within the next four years, and their replacement is appointed by Trump.

The repercussions go way beyond those topics and will have multi-decade impacts.

Most people do not have a clue of what may be in store in the not too distant future. Virtually all major social programs, civil rights legislation, environmental laws and labor laws are based on the Supreme Court's Commerce Clause decisions since the end of the Lochner Era. The odds of another Supreme Court justice dying.

Notable members of the Federalist Society include former Justice Antonin Scalia and the current Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. These people want to castrate the power of the federal government in the name of individual freedom and pursuant to a strict construction of the Constitution (strict construction is similar in many respects to arguing that States Rights was the real issue causing the Civil War rather than slavery-lipstick on the pig kind of deal)

I view it as likely that the next Justice will be among the 21 people recommended by this Society.

One potential candidate, Senator Mike Lee (R), believes that Social Security, Medicare and federal child labor laws are unconstitutional. Lee is a supporter of the 1918 Hammer decision. Utah Senator Questions Child Labor Law Constitutionality - YouTube (narrow reading of the Commerce Clause in line with Hammer)

As I have said many times over the years to deaf ears, the reactionary and wingnut forces in our society are far greater and stronger than the liberal/progressive ones. 

The threat to freedoms and even democracy are more likely to come from inside the U.S. than from external forces. The fundamental and conservative values that underpin a properly functioning democracy are already being undermined through voter suppression efforts, gerrymandering, widespread efforts to denigrate the free press, factually unsupported allegations about fraudulent voting and vote counting (
Trump Repeats Lie About Popular Vote in Meeting With Lawmakers), and growing antipathy toward religions that are not practiced by the majority. Those attacks on democratic principles are inconsistent with the True Conservative values embodied in the Bill of Rights and are undertaken by pseudo conservatives. 

+++++++++++

67% of Trump Voters believe that the unemployment rate went up during the Obama Presidency.

41% of Trump Voters believe the stock market went up during Obama's Presidency, while 39.9% are certain that it went down and 19% have no idea

14% of Trump Voters believe that Hillary ran a child sex ring.

73% of Trump Voters believe George Soros is paying Trump protestors to protest

PPP_Release_National_120916.pdf
++++++++++

In Trump's speech to the CIA, he said that the U.S. should have taken Iraq's oil and may do so at a later time:


 "The old expression, “to the victor belong the spoils” -- you remember.  I always used to say, keep the oil.  I wasn’t a fan of Iraq.  I didn’t want to go into Iraq.  But I will tell you, when we were in, we got out wrong.  And I always said, in addition to that, keep the oil.  Now, I said it for economic reasons.  But if you think about it, Mike, if we kept the oil you probably wouldn’t have ISIS because that’s where they made their money in the first place.  So we should have kept the oil.  But okay.  (Laughter.)  Maybe you’ll have another chance.  But the fact is, should have kept the oil." 


Trump CIA speech transcript - CBS News


Typical reckless speech by President Trump.

Besides being clearly illegal under international law, which obviously does not bother Trump, those kind of statements place U.S. troops in the region at risk now. The potential danger is aggravated by having Exxon's CEO as the new Secretary of State.  



Trump brought his sycophants along for this speech to cheer and laugh at the appropriate times. Trump Reportedly Brought His Own Staff to Cheer During C.I.A. Speech | Vanity Fair    

+++++++++


1. Gold: Using a commission free trade, I added to my GLD position last Friday at $114.725.


Closing Price: $115.08 +$.28

Day's Range $114.32 to $115.76

GLD did break its 50 day SMA to the upside around 1/11/17, using a 1 year YF chart, and has been in an uptrend since 12/22/16: GLD Interactive Stock Chart


On 11/3/2016, I sold my then highest cost lot profitably at $124.2. I would consider selling my current highest cost lot in the $128 to $135 range.

I trade the precious metal ETFs. I use the PM ETFs PPLT, SLV and GLD primarily as short term hedges for what I would broadly describe as  chaotic conditions in major risk asset categories.

At the moment, I view the PM ETFs and gold mining stocks as a hedge for the Orange King doing something that causes significant economic dislocation and stock market instability worldwide.

I trade the long cycles through purchases and sales of bullion while maintaining a position through bull and bear cycles as a hedge against Financial Armageddon ushered into being through catastrophic and precipitous declines in the USD's value and a series of failed Treasury auctions.

I am only nibbling now.



A.  Bought 1 Statoil  1.2% Senior Unsecured Bond Maturing on 1/17/2018



FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked at FINRA page)

Moody's Rating Aa3 as of 3/21/16 


YTM at Total Cost (99.878) = 1.325%


B. Bought 1 Stanley Black & Decker  1.622% Subordinated Unsecured Bond Maturing on 11/17/2018 (first junior bond purchase in this basket)




FINRA Page:  Bond Detail (prospectus linked at Finra Page)

Subordinated Debt Ratings: 

Moody's RatingBaa2 (11/07/2016)
Standard & Poor's RatingBBB+ (11/25/2013)
Fitch RatingBBB+ (01/05/2017)


YTM at Total Cost (99.882) = 1.688%%



C. Bought 2 Westpac 1.65% Senior Unsecured Bonds Maturing on 5/13/2019




FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked at FINRA page)

Moody's RatingAa2 (08/18/2016)
Standard & Poor's Rating
Fitch RatingAA- (05/13/2016)


YTM at Total Cost (99.317) =1.954%



A. Bought (Roth IRA Account) 1 Consolidated Edison 2% Senior Unsecured Bond Maturing on 5/15/2021





FINRA Page: Bond Detail

Moody's RatingA3 (05/11/2016)
Standard & Poor's RatingBBB+ (05/11/2016)
Fitch RatingBBB+ (10/26/2016)

YTM at Total Cost (98.08) = 2.472%


Fitch Affirms ConEd & Subsidiaries at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable-Report Dated 10/26/16

2016 Third Quarter Earnings Report

Based on my financial situation, I am highly unlikely to withdraw any funds from my Roth IRA accounts.

Those funds would be the last used to pay expenses since income is being generated tax free in them. This Consolidated Edison 2021 senior bond becomes a 4+ year tax free bond when owned in a Roth IRA.

{I will occasionally use this calculator to give me a precise reading on the time duration between two dates since I am now having trouble doing that in my head. Calculate Duration Between Two Dates – Results}

In the event that I need to withdraw from an IRA to pay expenses, the money better be there rather than in money heaven or be forced to sell stocks into a catastrophic bear market decline or during a long term secular bear market. I am more interested in the return of my money rather than the return on my money.

4. Contrarian and Income Strategies:

A. Bought 100 of Vivendi at $19.125 (commission free trade)



France charges a .2% transaction fee for stock purchases only.  Foreign Financial Transaction Fee Overview | Wells Fargo Advisors (.002 x. $1912.5= $3.83 plus another $1.91 in an unexplained fee included in the $5.74 fee amount shown in the preceding snapshot)

The two main Vivendi subsidiaries are the Universal Music Group ("UMG") and Canal + Group.

UMG is the "world leader in recorded music, music publishing and merchandising". Vivendi

Canal is a "leading pay-TV operator in France, and also serves markets in Africa, Poland and Vietnam. Canal through STUDIOCANAL is a "leading European player in production, sales and distribution of film and TV series".

I bought the USD priced ADR traded on the U.S. pink sheet exchange: Vivendi SA (VIVHY)

1 ADR = 1 Ordinary Share Priced in Euros

Ordinary Share Quote in Euros: Vivendi (VIV)

The ordinary shares were trading at €17.89 when I placed the trade. France's stock market was still open. I did a currency conversion of the ordinary share price into USDs prior to placing a limit order:



The EUR/USD exchange rate was up slightly.

While the Euro priced shares have outperformed the USD priced ADR over the past three years due to the decline in the EUR/USD exchange rate, the ordinary shares have declined as well in Euros:


VIV Stock Chart

VIV and VIVHY are in effect the same shares except the former is priced in Euros and the latter in USDs.

If the Euro/USD exchange rate declines further after my purchase, the underperformance of the ADR will continue. The buyer of VIVHY would want the Euro to gain in value against the USD. That will cause the USD priced ADR to outperform the shares priced in Euros and would also increase the dividend yield when the Euro sourced dividend is converted into USDs to pay the VIVHY owners.

Dividends: For 2012 through 2015, Vivendi has paid a €1 per share annual dividend: Dividend

At a €17.9 price per share, that would translate into about a 5.59% dividend yield before taxes.

My goal for this investment is to harvest one or more annual dividends and then sell the stock for whatever profit is available.

I have been able to claim foreign dividend tax payments as credits on my U.S. taxes. The rules are somewhat complex.

I bought this stock at Fidelity which has in the past filed relief at source claims for a 15% dividend withholding tax rate on dividends paid by France's corporations. Other brokers fail to make that claim and consequently 30% is withheld.

Credit Ratings: BBB by S & P and Baa2 by Moody's

Nine Month 2016 Financial Excerpt: 





Sourced: COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE


Those numbers are self-explanatory.

5. Worried About Trump and Stock Market Valuations:  


A. Sold 100 of 400+ ADX at $12.98 


Quote: Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc.  (ADX)


My last blog discussion of this unleveraged stock CEF was published last February: Item # 5. Reinitiated Position in Adams Express (NYSE: ADX): Bought 100 at $11.78+ at Update For CEF Basket Strategy As Of 2/26/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


ADX at CEF Connect

ADAMS DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUND, INC. - FORM N-30B - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 (2016 3rd Quarter Report)

I own 206+ ADX shares in two taxable accounts. I sold 100 using a commission free trade.


Fidelity Account Position Before Pare:



I selected the highest cost 100 share lot to sell that was purchased on 11/22/16.

Profit: +$51.98


In addition to that profit, I received a $.84  per share year end distribution or $84 for 100 shares bringing the total return up to $135.98. That would equate to a 10.91% total return realized in two months.    

The 6.637 shares were bought with that dividend at a total cost of $12.71 per share.

Adams Diversified Equity Fund Declares Year-End Distribution; Exceeds Its Annual 6% Minimum

Prior ADX Round-TRIPs 2014 and 2015:



2015 ADX 467+ Shares +$1,983.24



2014 ADX 459 Shares +$786.65







Total = +$2,769.89 realized gains in 2014 and 2015

Given the high level of dividends, ADX needs to be evaluated on a total return basis which requires adding the original dividend values to the realized gain number. I also view it as personally important to periodically sell shares bought with dividends at a profit, which was done in the previous snapshots.  That enhances the value of the dividends.

The worst possible dividend reinvestment scenario is to reinvest the dividends to buy more shares, pay taxes on the dividends, and then have the company go bankrupt which has happened on a number of occasions.

6. Sold Two 76 Share Lots of the Exchange Traded Bond HTGZ Using Commission Free Trades:

Profit Snapshots: +$76.67






In both accounts, I originally owned 100 shares but the issuer redeemed 24 shares. Hercules Technology Growth Capital Announces Intention to Partially Redeem its 7.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2019 (Press Release Dated 2/17/15)


I discussed this bond recently: Stocks, Bonds & Politics -January 11, 2017

The issuer has stated its intention to redeem this bond: SEC Filed Press Release

The bond will be redeemed with the proceeds from a 4.375% convertible bond sold to institutional investors.

I do not have any commission free trades in the ROTH IRA account that holds 176 shares. I will simply allow the issuer to redeem those shares at their $25 par value plus accrued interest.

Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members