Monday, December 8, 2014

Bought 100 TCRD at $12.83/Sold 433+ RMT at $12.76-Average Cost Per Share $7.91/

Big Picture: No Change

Stable Vix Pattern (Bullish):


Recent Developments:

Japan's 3rd quarter GDP  was revised down to -1.9 from the previous quarter. The previous estimate was that Japan's economy had contracted by 1.6%. Japan is in a recession caused by the government significantly raising the sales tax to 8% from 5%.

Crude oil accelerated its downward slide. MarketWatch Energy investors are being punished big time, particularly those who invest in small E & P companies and natural gas producers.

I filled up my Saturn Aura over the weekend at $2.79 per gallon. I was able to knock that price down to $1.79 per gallon with Kroger fuel points. I will buy gift cards at Kroger, including $50 Shell gift cards, for myself when I receive 4 times the face value in fuel points. A $50 Shell card would generate 200 fuel points or $.2 off per gallon. I would be paying otherwise with a debt card linked to the same checking account that is used to purchase the gift card, and that account pays almost nothing of course in interest.

The China Fund (CHN), which I own, declared a year end distribution of $3.7561 per share, consisting of $3.4669 per share in long term capital gains and the remainder in short term capital gains and income. I own some shares. This will be the 4th large distribution since I originally purchased shares in 2011. The China Fund-Distribution history I will consider selling the position before the ex dividend date using the reasoning explained below in Item # 2.

*******************

BDC's continued their downward slide today after PSEC slashed its monthly dividend. Prospect Capital Press Release

Fortunately, I have sold my PSEC position down to around 125 shares with an average cost per share near $9.5. I have predicted several times that PSEC would cut its dividend here at SA and in my blog. South Gent's Comments on PSEC: Prospect Capital Corporation | Seeking Alpha The suspension of PSEC's ATM program is viewed by me as a positive, since PSEC was diluting existing shareholders by selling shares at below net asset value per share. I noted earlier an article, published at Motley Fool, where the author pointed out some failed investments made during an earlier period when PSEC "opportunistically" sold stock below net asset value per share.

Tax loss selling is also contributing to price declines. At the moment, I am doing what I normally do when a sector collapses in price. I prepare a shopping list.

I am catching a falling knife by buying BDC shares in small amounts, spacing out the purchases in time. When and if there is a price recovery, I will consider selling my highest cost shares.

*****************

1. Bought 100 TCRD at $12.83 (see Disclaimer): I am a naturally contrarian investor, and have always been in that camp. I could not be anything other than a value/contrarian investor. Consequently, it is not surprising that I am now gravitating slightly in the direction of BDC stocks. Two inherent risk in contrarian investing are value traps and just being premature with a purchase, even though I prove to be correct about the stock's value longer term.


Snapshot of Trade:


Closing Price Day of Trade 12/5/14: TCRD: $12.88 -0.21 (-1.60%)



Security Description: THL Credit Inc. (TCRD) is an externally managed BDC that invests in middle market companies.

TCRD's IPO was in 2010 when the company sold shares at a public offering price of $13, with the underwriters paying $12.52 per share. Final Prospectus

In 2012, TCRD sold more shares at a public offering price of $14.09 per share, with the underwriters paying $13.5264. Final Prospectus Supplement The last reported net asset value per share prior to that offering was $13.17 as of 6/30/12.

The last TCRD stock offering was in 2013 with the company selling shares at a public offering price of $14.62, with the underwriters paying $14.0352. The last reported net asset value prior to that offering was $13.2 as of 3/31/13. Prospectus Supplement

So far, TCRD is not classified by me as a serial issuer of common stock. And, both share offerings after the 2010 IPO were well in excess of net asset value per share.

The BDC recently sold $45M of a 6.75% senior unsecured noted maturing in 2021. Prospectus That senior note is an exchange traded bond: THL Credit Inc. 6.75% Notes (TCRX)

TCRD  SEC Filings

THL Credit - Investor Relations

BDC Buzz wrote an article on THL Credit which was published at Seeking Alpha last September. He also wrote an article discussing THL's dividend coverage that was published last May.

THL Credit recently announced a joint venture with Perspecta Trident to invest primarily in senior secured first lien loans.

Prior Trades: None

Dividends: The current quarterly dividend is $.34 per share. The ex dividend date is 12/11/14.

November 2014 Investor Presentation (graph of dividends and net investment income at page 15)

Chart: On the day of my purchase, the stock slightly pierced to the downside its 50 day SMA which was shown at $12.93: TCRD Interactive Stock Chart The Yahoo Finance chart showed the 200 SMA line at $13.56 as of 12/5/14. The 200 SMA was broken to the downside in early 2014 and the stock has been trading below that line starting around 3/3/14. In short, the stock price is weak, which is the case for the entire BDC sector through most of 2014.

Recent Earnings Report: For the 2014 third quarter, net investment was $.36 per share, two cents higher than the quarterly dividend. The net asset value per share was reported at $13.29, up from $13.28 as of 6/30/14. The weighted average yield of income producing investments was 11.3%. The debt ratio was .63 down from .7 as of 6/30/14.

As of 9/30/14, TCRD had a 45% weighting in first lien debt and 27% in second lien debt.



SEC Filed Press Release

Two investments remained on non-accrual at the quarter's end: Express Courier and Wingspan.

The company remains "optimistic that we'll recover our capital" in the Express Courier investment. Page 3 Q3 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha.

THL made a $7.1M investment in a secured subordinated term loan issued by Express Courier, headquartered in Franklin, TN, back in 2012. (see also page 73, 2012 Annual Report at page 73 Form 10-K) That investment was valued at $6.601M as of 12/31/13 (page 102 Form 10-K) and at $7.699M as of 9/30/14 (10-Q at page 7)

Wingspan has been recapitalized in an effort led by TCRD. A subsidiary of Wingspan, Dimont & Associates, became an independent company after the quarter's end. TCRD's subordinated investment in Wingspan was converted into a controlling interest in Dimont with TCRD providing $4.5M in subordinated capital to Dimont.

Dimont and Associates is a hazard insurance claims service. Dimont Becomes Independent Company

The investment in Wingspan had an amortized cost of $18.447M and a fair value of $6.569M as of 9/30/14: Page 10-10-Q.

TCRD's debt and warrant investments made in C & K Market, "as well as certain interest due" ($14.3M in cost), were converted into common and preferred equity positions when that company emerged from bankruptcy in August 2014.

C&K Market-Home (operates 43 grocery stores;) Press Release-Emergence from BK (apparently the new debt financing is being provided by Solar Capital and GE Capital).

Q3 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha ("book value reflects the preservation of shareholder capital, a modest level of retained earnings and accretive capital raises since our IPO", at page 2)

Rationale: As with all other BDC stock purchases, the goal is to harvest the dividend income and to exit the position at any profit whatsoever. Assuming a total cost of $12.83 per share, and a continuation of the $.34 per share dividend, the dividend yield is about 10.6%.

The general goal is to harvest at least one year of dividends and to sell the shares at a profit. A profit on the shares requires patience,  some discipline on the entry price and sometimes a little luck.

For externally managed BDCs, I prefer to buy when the market price is at least 5% lower than the last reported net asset value per share.

My purchase at $12.83 was at a 3.46% discount to TCRD's last reported NAV per share of $13.29.

The closing market price today was at a 5.34% discount, so I would have been better off waiting one trading day and strictly complying with the greater than 5% decline guideline.

I view the relatively stable net asset value per share and the share issuances at premiums to net asset value per share to be positives.

Risks: Some loans have gone on non-accrual and have been converted into controlling equity interests. It remains to be seen whether management's optimism about recovering the original investment is warranted, only time will tell. Until I see more concrete evidence that the controlling equity interests are likely to be successful, I will probably refrain from buying more than 100 more shares in 50 share increments in the manner described below. On the positive side, the Wingspan investment had already been substantially written down, as noted above, before I made my first investment.

The risks are highlighted by the preceding discussions about defaults and a conversion of debt into equity interests.

The company discusses risks incident to its operations starting at page 32 of its 2013 Annual Report. Form 10-K I view it as a duty of every investor to familiarize themselves with the risks acknowledged by the BDC.

BDC stocks are in a clear downtrend of unknown duration.  I am catching a falling knife whenever I make any purchase now, which explains the small purchases spaced out over time.

It remains to be seen whether market related factors, including tax loss selling and piling on by momentum short sellers, are the primary causes for BDC share price declines recently, or whether investors have changed their perceptions about their desirability, more or less indefinitely. I am just gingerly adding some positions. 


Future Buys: I may average down with a  50 share buy when and if the discount expands to 7%+. That would put the average down price at below $12.36 and then another 50 shares when and if the discount expands to 10%. If I averaged down with another 100 shares, I would then consider selling the highest cost 100 shares lot, bought first, when I could do so profitably, keeping the lower cost lots that would improve my dividend yield based on the total average cost per share.

Closing Price Monday 12/8/14: TCRD: $12.58 -0.30 (-2.33%)

2. Sold 433+ RMT Shares at $12.76-Average Cost Per Share=$7.91 (see Disclaimer): 

Snapshot of Trade: 



Snapshot of Profit: 

2014 RMT Sold 433+ Shares +$2,057.88 Long Term
The foregoing does not include the fractional shares. The top line includes the total profits realized throughout 2014. I did not include in this snapshot prior 2014 sells which are shown in previous posts.

Royce Micro-Cap Trust Declares Fourth Quarter Common Stock Distribution of $2.19 Per Share

Snapshot of Total Cost: When I sold 126 RMT shares back in July, which were purchased with some of the dividend payments, I took a snapshot of the total cost numbers for the remaining shares calculated by my broker. Item # 6 Sold Taxable Account: 126 RMT at $12.6 (7/12/14 Post). I realized a profit of $149.91 from selling those shares bought with dividends only.

Rationale: I am skeptical that the stock market can continue moving upward without a serious correction. I am harvesting some profits while I still have them.

More importantly, my trading strategy for closed end funds is to consider a purchase when the discount to net asset value is greater than the 3 and 5 year averages and to consider selling when the discount shrinks to less than those averages.

The historical discount information can be found at CEFConnect under the "pricing information" tab.

CEFConnect Page for RMT

Discounts:
12/5/14: -6.23%
Average Discounts:
1 Year:  -10.57%
3 Years: -11.79%
5 Years: -13.04%

The discount has fallen since RMT announced a $2.19 year end distribution, with an ex dividend date on 12/11/14. Individual investors are apparently and inexplicably buying that tax event. The market price had risen $.26 per share when I sold today which will narrow the discount further when the fund reports its net asset value per share after the close.

When I was buying shares, the discount was far wider than now.

For example, referring to some of the lots just sold, I bought 50 shares in early 2010 when the discount was then -16.55% and another lot in 2009 when the discount was at -16.87% (8/21/09-net asset value per share then $8.12, closing price $6.75).

Over the subsequent years, the net asset value per share has increased even after adjusting for the dividend payments and the discount has shrunk.

I consequently made money in several ways with the RMT odd lot purchases: (1) dividends, (2) an increase in net asset value adjusted for the dividends, (3) a profit on all shares purchased with dividends, and (5) a narrowing of the discount to well under the historical norms. That is the ideal scenario and result for me when I buy CEF shares.

RMT has enjoyed robust gains since March 2009. Last year, the total return was 50.14% based on the market price. The annualized  total return over the past 5 years, through 12/5/14, was 19.05% based on the market price.

RMT's total annualized return from 3/9/09 through 12/5/14 was 32.06%. Calculator

I am satisfied and have no need or reason to press my good fortune on this investment.

I would also note that Tennessee, where I reside, does not have a state income tax on earned income or on capital gains realized from stock transactions. I would have to pay a 6% tax on a capital gains distribution from a mutual fund which would be almost $57 on the upcoming RMT distribution which I will not have to pay after selling the shares for a LT capital gain before the ex dividend date.

Closing Price Monday 12/8/14: RMT: $12.57 +0.07 (+0.56%)

The discount in fact narrowed to -4.48% as of 12/8/14, based on the preceding closing price and a net asset value per share of $13.16, down from $13.33 last Friday. At my sale's price of $12.76, the discount to net asset value declines further to just 3%.  

Friday, December 5, 2014

Bought Back 100 ORKLY at 7.285-Flyer's Basket/Added 100 PNNT at $10.47

Big Picture: No Change

Stable Vix Pattern (Bullish):


Recent Developments:


The government reported that 321,000 jobs were added last month, much better than the consensus estimate of 235,000. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 5.8%. The data for September and October was revised to add 44,000 more jobs. The average work week rose by .1 hour. Average hourly earnings increased by 9 cents to $24.66. Employment Situation Summary The U-6 number decreased to 11.4 from 11.5. Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization

U-6 Historical
Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers plus total employed part time for economic reasons-St. Louis Fed

The FRB's Beige Book, based on reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Districts, noted that manufacturing activity and consumer spending increased in most districts, and employment "gains were widespread across the Districts".

S & P downgraded Italy's debt to BBB-, one notch above junk.

Saudi Arabia cut prices again for its U.S. and Asian customers. MarketWatch

Royce Micro-Cap Trust (RMT) declared a quarterly distribution of $2.19 per share. I have sold this CEF down to 433+ shares earlier this year with an average cost per share of $7.91 (snapshot of current position at Item # 6 Sold Taxable Account: 126 RMT at $12.6.

The Swiss Helvetia Fund declared a long term capital distribution of $2.195 per share. I own 901+ shares, and I am reinvesting the dividends.


***************************


1. Bought 100 ORKLY at $7.285 ($500 to $1,000 Flyer's Basket Strategy)(see Disclaimer): 


Snapshot of Trade:


1 ADR Share=1 Ordinary Share

The ADR shares are traded on the U.S. pink sheet exchange. ORKLY Orkla ASA

When the symbol ends in a "Y", rather than an "F", the investor is buying an American Depository Receipt rather than the ordinary shares.

The ordinary shares trade on the Oslo Stock exchange in Norway. Those shares are priced in Norwegian Krone (hereinafter "NOK"). Those shares closed on the day of my purchase at NOK 51.60 -0.40 (-0.77%).


Bloomberg Page for ORK:NO (Oslo Stock Exchange)

Security Description: Orkla ASA ADS (ORKLY) is a conglomerate based in Norway that owns outright, or has an interest in a hodgepodge of unrelated businesses. The company is making slow progress in jettisoning, or forming joint ventures for businesses unrelated to consumer products.

Its most important core business is branded consumer products which "consists of a portfolio of well-known brands . . . that hold mainly No. 1 and No. 2 positions in their categories".  About Orkla The primary geographic area for those positions would be in Orkla's home markets of Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and the Baltics, but the company claims to have  "good positions in certain product categories in India, the Czech Republic, Austria and Russia".

Consumer products:  

Orkla Foods is the most important business with  2013 operating revenues of NOK 9.797 billion. This business is "concentrated" in Orkla's "own strong brands, which largely hold no.1 and no. 2 positions in their home markets"

The Orkla Confectionery & Snacks business  reported  2013 revenues of NOK 4.784B. These products are sold in the Nordic and Baltic regions.

The primary service ares for the Orkla Home & Personal products businesses is the Nordic region. The products include detergents, toothbrushes, personal care products, dietary supplements and health products, underwear, socks, painting tools and cleaning products, etc. This grouping of consumer products generated NOK 4.77B in revenues in 2013.

Orkla Food Ingredients

Orkla has a 42.5% interest in Jotun, referred to by Orkla  as one of the "world's leading manufacturers of paints, coatings and powder coatings with 58 subsidiaries, four joint ventures and severn associated Companies. Page 23-2013 Annual Report 

Jotun Website

The company also owns the Sarpsfoss hydroelectric power plant and has a 85% stake in the hydroelectric facility AS Saudefaldene's. That hydro plant has normal production volume of 2.4TWh. The hydro business reported EBITA of NOK 46M in the third quarter.

Orkla formed a 50/50 joint venture with Norsk Hydro known as Sapa that is the "world's leading aluminum solutions provider" Sapa-Orkla Investments The asset contributions made by Orkla to this JV were greater than Norsk Hydro, so Orkla received NOK 1.8 billion in compensation for this difference.

The company also owns real estate and various investments. Orkla Financial Investments

The company is in the process of divesting Graenges, a maker of roiled aluminum for the heat exchanger industry. Orkla sold a 60% stake in Graenges in an IPO raising Swedish Krona 3.22B. SEK/USD Interactive Chart

Granges AB - Bloomberg;

Closing Price Day of Trade: GRNG.ST: SEK47.50 -0.50 (-1.04%)

Largest shareholders-Gränges (Orkla shown as owning 23,138,286 shares valued at SEK 1,099,068,585 or about USD146,610,896 on the 12/4/14 exchange rate)

I was glad to see that Orkla sold Orkla Confectionary Brands Russia since I last looked at the company.  For most companies, it is best just to stay away from place like Venezuela and Russia. 

The FPA Crescent mutual fund, managed by Steve Romick, owned over 23 million ordinary shares as of 6/30/14: Semi-Annual Report at page 14

In the October 2013 Art of Successful Investing conference, hosted by Barron's, Orkla was mentioned as a value stock by Oscar Schafer who believes that the shares "could be worth NOK75 to NOK 80." The shares were then trading a USD equivalent of NOK 45 or $7.63. Schafer references the ongoing efforts to improve profit margins and to the Chairman's 20% stake in the company.

There are SeekingAlpha articles discussing this company. One was published last November and another, more comprehensive one, in  June 2013.

Prior Trade: Item # 4 Sold  100 ORKLY at $9 (9/6/14 Post)(snapshot: total return $164.16)-Item # 2 Bought 100 ORKLY at $7.61 (1/13/14 Post)

I also view it as a victory when I profitably exit a position and then buy back the shares at a lower price than the previous purchase.

Chart: The charts for both the ordinary shares priced in NOKs, ORK.OL, and the ORKLY chart provide no solace for a buyer. The ordinary shares have performed better than the USD priced ORKLY due to the weakness in the NOK that flows through into the pricing of ORKLY.

On the day of my purchase, Yahoo Finance had the ORKLY's 200 day SMA line at $8.58 and the 50 day SMA line at $8.01 with the stock in a clear downtrend. So, once again, I am catching a falling knife in the Flyer's Basket risk category. 

Dividends: The dividend history can be found at Orkla's website. Dividends are generally paid annually, but there was a special dividend of 5 NOKs per share for the 2010 accounting year. The last payment, which I received for the prior 100 share lot owned, was NOK 2.5 per share which translated into $41.68 for 100 ORKLY shares (250 NOKs).


2014 Annual Dividend on 100 ORKLY Shares:


Norway's withholding tax was 15% of the total dividend amount ($41.68) before the annual ADR fee charged by the ADR custodian, generally somewhere in the 1 to 3 cent per share range. I was charged 2.5 cents per share or $2.5 for 100 shares which came out of the total dividend paid by Orkla.

I will not own a foreign security in an IRA when a foreign withholding tax is taken from the distribution. When the distribution is paid into a retirement account, it is not recoverable.

If 250 NOKs were paid as the annual dividend next dividend next year, and the currency conversion was then the same as on 12/4/14, then the USD value would be $35.40, in effect a dividend cut for the owner of ORKLY compared to the 2014 payment, even though the payment in NOKs was assumed to be same.

If I further assume in this hypothetical that the total cost for 100 shares was $729, then the dividend yield with all of those assumptions would be about 4.86% before Norway's withholding tax and the annual ADR custodian fee. That yield would go up or down depending on the exchange rate at the time of conversion from NOKs to USDs.

Recent Earnings Report: The market was disappointed with this report. This report is discussed in a Reuters article that noted that third quarter EBITDA was reported at NOK860M, slightly below the consensus forecast of NOK873M. The shares fell 6% in response to this report. The primary problem was a decline in revenues and EBITA from Orkla Foods.





At the time of that earnings release, $1 equaled $6.7172 NOKs.

Orkla 2014 Third Quarter .pdf

2013 Third Quarter Presentation

Q3 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha


Rational: The dividend will provide some support to the share price at current levels.

The dividend is paid in Krone which will be converted into USDs for the ADS shares. The value of that dividend to an owner of the ADS shares will be impacted by the conversion rate on that applicable date.  The dividend is paid annually.

There is some potential here for a turnaround based on the ongoing restructuring and refocusing efforts.

There are assets that can be readily sold to expand the consumer products businesses.

As noted below, currency risk is material, but currency conversion is both a potential risk and benefit. The NOKs value in USDs has already depreciated to the March 2009 lows:

Long Term NOK/USD Chart:


The USD priced shares will outperform the ordinary shares when and if the NOK rises in value against the USD.

Risks: With any foreign stock, currency risk is important. If the Krone fell in value against the USD after my purchase, that decline will flow through to the ADS price.

The Norwegian Krone is widely view as a commodity currency due to the importance of oil revenues in Norway's economy. CNBC;  Bloomberg The recent slide in oil has caused a significant slide in the value of NOK against the USD. NOK/USD Interactive Chart (13 year low) On May 9, 2014, 1 NOK would buy about $.1696 and that conversion rate has declined to $.1415 on 12/4/14 or about a 16.57% decline. That decline flows through into the pricing of the the USD priced ORKLY.

Over the past year, the currency conversion decline in the NOK's value has caused the USD priced ORKLY shares to underperform the NOK price ordinary shares by over 12% through 12/4/14.

Orkla's operations in Russia appear to be a problem for the company.

The restructuring, downsizing and refocusing efforts may not produce the hoped for results.

I am not expressing much confidence in Orkla's future by classifying the investment as part of the Flyer's basket strategy which limits my total exposure to $500 to $1,000.

Future Buys and Sells: I am not likely to buy more unless I see significant improvements in revenues and profits. I do not have a price target for selling the shares. As noted above, the stock appears to be undervalued, but is undergoing a restructuring process that creates valuation problems. Recent earnings reports have also been disappointing. I am basically nibbling at the shares before it becomes apparent whether or not the company can grow its remaining businesses at a higher than currently anticipated rate.

Closing Prices 12/5/14:
ORKLY: $7.25 +0.01 (+0.14%)
ORK.OL: 51.90 +0.30 (+0.58%)
NOK/USD= .1397 -0.0003 (-0.18%)

2. Added 100 PNNT at $10.47 (see Disclaimer): 

Snapshot of Trade: 


Closing Price Day of Trade 12/5/14: PNNT: $10.48 -0.17 (-1.59%)

Security Description: PennantPark Investment (PNNT) is an externally managed BDC.

PNNT sold shares last September at a public offering price of $11.63 per share. The underwriter's paid $11.2811 per share. PennantPark Investment Corporation Prices Public OfferingProspectus

PNNT SEC Filings

Since early in 2010, this stock has traded mostly in a narrow channel between $10 to $12 after crashing in 2008 and early 2009. PNNT Interactive Stock Chart

Since 4/19/2007 and through 12/4/14, the annualized total return with dividends reinvested was 7.14%. Calculator That is better than SPY, the S & P 500 ETF, which produced a 6.78% annualized return over the same period. To secure the PNNT return, however, the owner would have had to experience the near total collapse in PNNT's price during the Near Depression and to keep reinvesting the dividend at those low single digit market prices.

If I start that total return calculation on 1/2/2010, the PNNT annualized return increases to 13.47%. Starting the calculation on March 9, 2009 after the price had cratered to the low single digits, the annualized total return increases to a whopping 39.88%. In short, a lot depends on when you buy.

PNNT Net Asset Value Per Share History: 
Sourced 10-K and  10-Qs
9/30/14:     $11.03
6/30/12:     $10.16
6/30/11:     $11.08
6/30/10:     $10.94
6/30/09:     $11.72
9/30/08:     $10.
6/30/07:     $12.83
3/31/07:     $12.08
April 2007: IPO at $15  Prospectus (underwriters paid $14.025)

The external managers are paid 2% of gross assets plus a generous incentive fee.

A list of investments can be found starting at page 61 of the recently filed Annual Report:10-K


Prior Trades: The prior trades are summarized in Item # 2: Bought 100 PNNT at $10.66-Regular IRA This last purchase brings me up to 300 shares.

I last sold PNNT when the market price was at a premium to NAV per share, viewed as substantial for an externally managed BDC in my opinion. Item # 5 Sold 50 PNNT at $11.92 (12/17/13 Post)(profit $71.68)- Item # 6 Bought 50 PNNT at $10.2-ROTH IRA (11/21/12 Post) When I sold that 50 share lot, the last reported net asset value per share was $10.49 as of 9/30/13, so an $11.92 market price was a 13.63% premium to that NAV number.

Last Earnings Report: For its 4th fiscal quarter which ended on 9/30/14, PNNT reported core net investment income of $.34 per share. The net asset value per share was reported at $11.03. The weighted average yield on debt investments was 12.5% as of 9/30/14.

As of 9/30/14, this BDC had a significant exposure to subordinated debt, preferred stock and common equity:



SEC Filed Press Release

Rationale: As with all BDCs, my goal is to harvest a 10% annualized total return and will consider doing so when and if I achieve that objective. I could achieve that annualized return by collecting 4 dividends and selling the shares at a slight loss. I am not likely to sell the shares for a loss unless I become spooked about this BDC's performance.

The current quarterly dividend is $.28 per share. At a total cost of $10.43 per share, and assuming a continuation of that rate, the dividend yield would be about 10.74%.

The general idea is to harvest that yield and to escape without losing money on the shares. Easier said than done is my motto for externally managed BDCs.

This last purchase was at a 5.4% discount to the last reported net asset value per share.

By buying at below the last reported net asset value per share, I simply improve my chances of getting out with a share loss.

PNNT is not a serial issuer of common stock like PSEC which unfortunately also has a history of selling shares before net asset value per share. I view PSEC's continuing share sales at below net asset value, which is dilutive to existing shareholders, to be a major negative for owning PSEC shares.  

Risks: As with all BDCs, PNNT has considerable risks summarized in a very long discussion found in its F/Y 2014 Annual Report staring at page 18, 10-K

BDCs invest in risky companies and do not retain much of a capital after paying dividends to their common shareholders. The shares will perform badly during a recession.

PNNT has an usually large allocation to riskier subordinated debt and a large second lien debt weighting (see above snapshot)

Loans made by BDCs are generally not rated by Moody's or S & P. If the loans were rated, most of them would be at CCC+ or lower. An average portfolio yield of 12.5% adequately describes the risk when the ten year treasury is hovering around 2.3.%.

PNNT had about a 9% exposure to the oil and gas sector as of 9/30/14. The largest exposure appears to be to New Gulf Resources, L.L.C. at 5%, a company that closed on a $500M loan last May to buy some assets from Halcon Resources. That exposure may have contributed some to the recent price weakness in PNNT's shares. That investment is shown as second lien debt with an 11.75% coupon with a value of $45.675M and a cost of $44.615+M as of 9/30/14 (page 61, 10-K) There is shown some subordinated debt at page 62, with a cost of 13.030+M and a value of $10.665M that looks like a 12% PIK note (which I call pretend interest payments, though the correct name is payment-in-kind) PNNT also owns some warrants (cost $495,000, valued at 2.97M as of 930/14, page 63)

Another smaller E & P investment is in a company called Energy & Exploration Partners which filed for an IPO in September 2014. S-1S-1/A The share symbol was shown as ENXP in the prospectus. I believe that this company is still private. The last few months have not been an opportune time to bring an E & P public.

Future Buys and Sells: I will not buy more shares. I was full at 200 shares, given my analysis of the potential rewards and risks, but decided to add another 100 shares anyway that only slightly increases my overall risk.

I am hoping that most of the BDC weakness late this year is related to tax loss selling. I hope to sell 100 shares next year, when and if the market price per share returns to a slight premium to net asset value per share. When I discussed buying just 40 shares of BDCL, I mentioned that tax loss selling was one explanation for the persistent weakness in BDC stock prices during the current quarter. I also noted other possible explanations that may extend the selling onslaught into next year and beyond.  

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Bought 50 MLPG at $36-Roth IRA/Elevated CORR from LT Basket to REIT Basket: Added 100 at $6.5

Big Picture: No Change

Stable Vix Pattern (Bullish):


Recent Developments:

In a surprising development, the National Retail Federation reported that retail sales declined 11% over the Thanksgiving holiday including "Black Friday" Bloomberg WSJ Some analysts do not believe the trade group's numbers, given the improving employment picture and lower gas prices. WSJ I would work under the assumption that the estimate provided by the NRF is close to being accurate. It remains to be seen whether or not the weakness will persist through Christmas.

Moody's downgraded Japan's debt to A1 from Aa3.

ADP reported that private sector employers added 208,000 jobs in November.

The ISM services index rose to 59.3% in November, up from 57.1 in October. The new orders component increased to 61.4 from 59.1. Business activity/production increased to 64.4 from 60.

FYI, I discussed earlier buying as a Lotto 50 shares of RRST, an Israeli company. Bought 50 RRST at $7.4-Lotto I received a dividend payment. The withholding rate appears to be 25%, which is something to keep in mind. I googled the issue and confirmed that rate for U.S. residents: Israeli Withholding Taxes on Dividends



******************

1. Bought 50 MLPG at $36-Roth IRA (see Disclaimer):

Snapshot of Trade:


Quote Prior to Order:


Closing Price 12/1/14: $36.13 -$2.05 (-5.37%)

MLPG Historical Prices

The closing price on 11/26/14 was $40.15. In two trading days, the price for this MLP infrastructure ETN declined by 10.34% to my $36 purchase price.

Security Description: The UBS AG E-TRACS linked to Alerian Natural Gas MLP Index (MLPG) is an exchange traded note issued by UBS that tracks an index of the 20 largest, by market capitalization, natural gas infrastructure MLPs.

An ETN is a senior unsecured note, which subjects the owner to the credit risk of the issuer.



Sponsor's Website: ETRACS Alerian Natural Gas MLP Index ETN

Free Writing Prospectus Filed with SEC in 2011

The sponsor charges a .85% annual tracking fee.

Prior Trades: At the time of this trade, I owned 50 shares in a taxable account. Item # 1 Added 50 of the ETN MLPG at $35.15 (8/31/13 Post). I intend to sell those shares when and if the price recovers to $40+, as I transition ownership to the Roth IRA and out of a taxable account.

I regretted flipping shares in the Roth IRA, viewed as the more appropriate vehicle for owning this security. Item # 6 Sold 50 MLPG at $35.77-Roth IRA (2/17/14 Post)(snapshot of profit=$211.48 +$89.48 in dividends)-Item # 4 Bought 50 MLPG at $31.26-ROTH IRA (2/27/13 Post)

Distributions: Distributions are paid quarterly at a variable rate.

For 2014, the total amounted to $1.7721 per share, down slightly from the $1.7804 paid in 2013.

One of the components in the index tracked by this ETN slashed their distribution rate in February 2014, as discussed in the risk section below, so the slight decline in the 2014 annual rate from 2013 is not surprising for that reason.

The distribution rate in 2012 was $1.5022. While it is not certain, I would anticipate that the annual distribution per share will trend up over time, assuming no more major slashes from one of the indexes components.

That anticipation is based on a review of the dividend histories. Nasdaq provides a history of dividend payments for publicly traded companies. The following are links to distribution histories for some of the components:

Williams Partners L.P. (WPZ) Dividend Date & History
Regency Energy Partners LP (RGP) Dividend Date & History
TC PipeLines, LP (TCP) Dividend Date & History
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) Dividend Date & History (not adjusted for 2 for 1 split)
EQT Midstream Partners, LP (EQM) Dividend Date & History
ONEOK Partners, L.P. (OKS) Dividend Date & History
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. (APL) Dividend Date & History

Since the penny distribution rate will be variable, I calculated the dividend yield simply by taking the total for the last four distributions ($1.7721) and assumed a total cost per share of $36. With those assumptions, the dividend yield is about 4.92%.

I owned 50 shares of MLPG in a taxable account in 2013, and the one distribution paid was not classified as "qualified":


Rationale:

As noted in the sponsor's fact sheet, the distributions are reported as ordinary income in a 1099 and the owner of this security will not receive a K-1 form. This is a major selling point for me since I hate fooling with K-1s at tax time.

The distributions are tax exempt in the Roth IRA. I intend to sell the 50 share lot owned in the taxable account when and if the price recovers to $40 or so.

The most important reason is my opinion that infrastructure companies are the best way to play the long term natural gas super cycle. The Natural Gas Super Cycle: Bought Back First Trust ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index Fund | Seeking Alpha Perhaps, I could have a waited a few weeks before buying back a 50 share FCG lot.

While U.S. oil consumption is still well below levels hit in 2005-2006, natural gas consumption has been steadily increasing.


United States - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Natural gas has to be processed, transported and stored and those functions are provided by the infrastructure MLPs. I selected MLPG to purchase since it is the closest pure natural gas infrastructure ETN. Other investors are apparently not as interested in this theme since the daily volume in MLPG is anemic.  

I also like the diversification of an index. I find MLPs hard to analyze. I frequently read long articles written by accounting experts who disagree about the accuracy of an MLP's accounting. I have never taken a course in accounting, nor have I read a book on the subject. I am a generalist when it comes to investing and do not have the time or the inclination to learn about individual MLPs, at least at the moment.

While I am certainly no expert in natural gas infrastructure MLPs, the 10%+ decline in MLPG over just two trading days made no sense to me. These companies are not directly exposed to natural gas prices. They are not E & P companies.

The natural gas pipeline is more like a toll road, collecting fees for those traveling along its path and more natural gas is being consumed in the U.S.

I also do not view natural gas to be interchangeable with oil. A spike down in crude prices should not have more than a temporary impact on natural gas prices that are more correlated to the unique demand and uses for natural gas. The assumption underlying the recent decline in natural gas prices appears to be that demand for natural gas will fall as users substitute oil. Perhaps, there may be a few users who could substitute oil for natural gas.

Who has the choice to use oil when it is cheaper than natural gas for the intended use? If you have natural gas heating in your home or business, can you switch now to heating oil? How many vehicles have the option to switch to gasoline from natural gas? Are gas turbines in combined cycle generation plants going to start using oil and how is that going to take place?

In the past, there was far more oil fired generation than now. Those generating stations are mostly confined to Hawaii and the Northeast now. Oil-fired generation -Platts; High cost, oil-fired generation creates potential for shift in Hawaiian electric sources-U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)"Duke Energy to shut down oil-fired power plant in Ohio" Florida Blasts Away Old Oil Power Plant"Georgia Power to close 15 coal, oil units"-ajc.com"NRG shutting Norwalk oil-fired power plant" | HartfordBusiness.com Those plants are rapidly becoming relics from the past.

Risks: 

(1) Credit Risk of the Issuer: An ETN is a senior unsecured note. As such, the owner of MLPG is subject to the credit risk of UBS. If UBS goes bankrupt the owner of this security will be in the same position as all other owners of the issuer's unsecured senior debt. While the amount of recovery in such an eventuality is unknowable, I generally would anticipate around 15 to 25 cents on the dollar after a prolonged period in bankruptcy where nothing would be paid to the owners of the issuer's debt.

While this may be a minimal risk now, the owners of Lehman's unsecured senior notes found out the hard way about this risk after that firm's collapse and bankruptcy filing.

(2) Market Risk: As an example of market risk, Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (BWP), one of the constituents in the index being tracked by MLPG, had a really bad day on 2/10/14, declining $11.08 to close at $13.01.  Boardwalk partners cut its distribution by 80% to 10 cents per share. The reason given by the company was that increased natural gas production was reducing transportation rates and revenues from storage services. Boardwalk Announces Fourth Quarter 2013 Results And Announces Quarterly Distribution Of $0.10 Per.UnitBloomberg. The BWP price has recovered a tad since that fiasco and is still owned by MLPG.


(3) Early Redemption Risk: One risk mentioned by the sponsor is that UBS may elect to redeem the ETN at anytime now. (click "key considerations" tab at the sponsor's website). UBS may redeem it early based on the performance of the index less the "accrued" tracking fee. Technically, this security is a senior unsecured note that has a par value of $25 and matures on 7/9/2040.

The call settlement amount is explained in the prospectus and is to complicated to explain here, so I just took a snapshot:



This may be a link to a current quote for the VWAP level referenced in the forgoing snapshot that is a component of the redemption calculation: Alerian Natural Gas MLP Index VWAP Level  On the day of my purchase, the VWAP level closed at 795.73. The VWAP level on the Initial Trade date was 553.17.

There is even a more detailed description starting at page S-3 of the Prospectus. When an intelligent investor reads the foregoing summary of the redemption calculation, the eyes irresistibly start to roll back into the head and meaningful comprehension is at best limited.

If I become aware of an optional redemption notice, I will consider selling MLPG rather than waiting for UBS to do its computation. I can only hope that UBS does not call the note early, and consequently I will not have to worry about the redemption price. The chance is nil that I will own MLPG on the redemption date in 2040.

(4) More Warnings from the Sponsor: The sponsor claims that this security is only appropriate for an investor who answers the following questions in the affirmative:



That warning is like reading the pamphlet that comes with most prescription medicines. After reading how the medicine can cause virtually every known malady known to humans, why take the medicine at all?

In short, I do not like the risks associated with ETN products, including the added credit risk of the sponsor in addition to the risks associated with the companies included in the index being tracked by the ETN.

If I am going to invest in the MLP space, I have no choice but to choose my poison.

Poison comes in three flavors in my view: direct ownership of MLPs, ETNs and ETFs. Some would add a 4th: CEFs.

I could invest in the MLPs directly, where I can at least secure their tax advantages. However, since I prepare my own tax return, and prefer to limit my aggravation to the extent possible during that preparation process, I quit fooling with MLPs and their K-1 that arrived shortly before April 15.

My last MLP was Linn Energy sold at $25.9 back in 2010. Item # 1 Sold 100 LINE at $25.9 (6/26/14 Post-profit snapshot $971.97) I have not own a MLP directly since that time.

I am too cheap to pay an accountant a $1,000 to prepare the return, so owning MLP's directly is not the poison that I choose, at least until I am no longer sufficiently compos mentis to prepare my return and have to hire a CPA.

The last alternative is probably the worst one, owning MLP's in the ETF legal structure. Congress has made some silly rule that a fund can not have more than a 25% weighting in MLPs and qualify as a pass through entity at the corporate level. The MLP ETF has to be organized as a regular "C" corporation and consequently must accrue and pay taxes at the corporate level. Seeking Alpha, Motley Fool,  WSJ It is my understanding that the fund will account for that accrued tax liability in the fund's net asset value. This is a link to the tax accruals for YMLP, an ETF MLP: YMLP Tax Accruals. A discussion of the ETF MLP's tax deferral liability and how it can impact net asset value per share can be found starting at page 5 of the Global X MLP ETF (MLPA:) prospectus: MLPA Prospectus

The MLP ETF does avoid the K-1 hassle and the various risks linked to ETNs, which I view as potentially material.

5. Vulnerability to Rising Rates: Many investors view MLPs as bond substitutes and their current yield could become unattractive to them compared to alternatives after a sustained rise in rates. One fund manager in the space estimated that the "average" MLP price would decline by 10% for every one percent increase in rates.  WSJ That impact did not happen in 2013 when interest rates started to rise in May. The J P Morgan Alerian MLP ETN (AMJ) had a total return of 28.51% in 2013, based on net asset value, according to Morningstar.

MLPG's total return in 2013 was 35.72% based on net asset value.

Still, I would not discount the potential negative impact from competitive yield products during a persistent rate increase cycle.

A rise in rates would negatively impact their borrowing costs.

Closing Price 12/3/14: MLPG: $37.69 +0.40 (+1.09%)

2. Elevated CORR to REIT Basket Strategy from Lottery Ticket Basket: Added 100 Shares at $6.5 (Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket)(see Disclaimer): 

Snapshot of Trade: 



Prior Trade: I discussed this REIT at length in a recent SA Instablog: Lottery Ticket Basket Strategy-Bought 40 CORR At $7 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha That 40 shares will be transferred from the LT Basket to the REIT Basket. CORR is unique in that it is an infrastructure REIT.

I am not going to repeat that earlier discussion here, but will simply summarize the reasons for the slight upgrade in the risk/benefit assessment that permitted this 100 share buy. I still have the same concerns about the risks, as described in that post. I simply have a slightly more positive view of the potential benefits.

Since I purchased these shares, CORR agreed to acquire MoGas Pipeline for $125 million and has closed that acquisition. SEC Filed Press Release Dated 11/24/14 That is a large acquisition for such a small company.

This acquisition is discussed in an article published at Benzinga.

Part of the funding was raised by a share offering priced to the public at $6.8 per share. The underwriter's paid $6.443 per share, Prospectus The underwriter's exercised the entire over allotment option of 1.95 million shares, bringing the total offering to 14.95M shares sold at $6.8. After that offering, CORR had 46,598,904 shares outstanding.

In conjunction with this acquisition, CORR raised its quarterly dividend to $.135 from $.13. CorEnergy to Acquire MoGas Pipeline for $125 Million With the decline in price to $6.5 from my first purchase at $7, and the slight dividend increase, the yield improved to about 8.3% at a total cost per share of $6.5. The increase in yield and the dividend increase were two reasons for the promotion to the REIT Basket Strategy.

Another reason is that I was able to buy shares at a lower price than the $6.8 public offering price.

Another reason is that this security appears to have suffered from the downdraft in infrastructure stocks, discussed in Item #1 above, for no fundamental reason that I can discern.

Recent Earnings Report: For the 2014 third quarter, CORR reported both FFO and AFFO of $.16 per share. Revenues increased to $9.345+M from $7.574M in the 2013 third quarter. SEC Filed Press Release

CORR-9/30/14 10-Q

Closing Price 12/3/14: CORR: $6.50 -0.06 (-0.91%)

CORR Historical Prices 

Regional Bank Basket as of 12/2/14

This strategy is explained in my Gateway Post on this topic:

Snapshots of realized gains and losses can be found at the end of that post.


This basket will be updated randomly, usually within 1 to 2 months after the last update. 

The dividend yield showed in this table is calculated by Yahoo Finance based on yesterday's closing prices. My dividend yield for each position will be different based on my total cost numbers. In most cases, with FNFG and VLY being notable exceptions, my dividend yield will be higher.

Dividend Yields 5% or higher: Based on Total Cost
NYCB: 8.44%
WASH: 8.34%
UBSI: 7.66%
FNLC: 5.38%
CBU: 5.15%
TRST: 5.1%
CCNE: 5.%

I am not tracking reinvested dividends in the following table. The unrealized gains per holding do not include reinvested dividends.

Over the life of this basket strategy, I anticipate that the dividends will provide 40% to 50% of the total return. I am generally keeping my total exposure between $40,000 to $50,000.

After a number of adds, I am now over my minimum $40,000 allocation after a bout of profit taking last year.


In 2013, my dividend total from this basket totaled $1,932,93, up from $1,896.25 in 2012 and $1,660.57 in 2011.  

Regional bank stocks are basically churning in price this year as interest rates started to go back down. One of the regional bank ETFs, KRE, closed at $40.61 on 12/31/13 and at KRE: 38.93 +1.02 (+2.69%) today, but has closed as low as $36.84 this year (2/3/14). SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF ETF Chart

I have nibbled at this ETF: Bought Taxable Accounts: 50 KRE at $39.55 (9/20/14 Post)

The abnormally low rates benefited banks some when deposit yields were repriced down, but even 5 year bank CDs taken out in 2008 at higher rates have now matured, and the positive impact of that repricing is no longer present to any meaningful degree. 

Instead, the decline in rates for loans simply compresses net interest margin. When rates were rising last year, regional bank stocks were in an uptrend based on the common belief that higher intermediate and long rates would be a net positive for them, particularly when short terms were likely to remain near zero through mid-2015 and then rise slowly and modestly in 2016-2017. The rate spike starting last May impacted intermediate and long term rates. Short term rates remained anchored by ZIRP. 

I have used the downdraft in prices this year to add positions to my basket after selling into last year's strength.

Since the last update, I have eliminated Susquehanna Bancshares: 


Susquehanna accepted an acquisition offer from BB&T

I pared my position in First Financial Bancorp (FFBC): Pared Highest Cost Shares by Selling 55 FFBC at $17.31 (11/1/14 Post) 


The yields shown in the table below are calculated by Yahoo Finance based on today's closing prices rather than at my total cost per share. 

Net Realized Gains 2010 to Date: $17,244.25  (snapshots are in the Gateway Post) 
Dividends Received 2010 through 2013=$6,623.72

In my next update I will have the dividend figure for 2014. 

Click to Enlarge:


Regional Bank Basket as of 12/2/14
Comparison Data From the St. Louis Fed:
Assets at Banks whose ALLL exceeds their Nonperforming Loans (I prefer a coverage ratio of  over 100% at the time of my initial purchase)(ALLL=Allowance for loan losses)

New Capital Rules From the FDIC to Implement Basel III Capital Rules: 



There were two dividend increases since the last update: