Monday, October 30, 2017

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: FIE:CA, PG, SGP:AU, ZRE:CA/Tennessee Municipal Bond Allocation/Middle Class Homeowners As Collateral Damage in GOP's Tax Plan

Portfolio Management-High Quality Tennessee Municipal Bonds:

I have with two recent purchases, including the one mentioned below, brought my Tennessee municipal bond allocation up to $250K in principal amount. I intend to keep it at that amount until the 2018 first quarter where I will buy 5 more bonds as outlined in the portfolio management section here.


The current breakdown as revised for two $5K bond purchases is as follows:


Par Value Totals/ Cost Numbers / Estimated Annual Tax Free Income

Fidelity: $125K/$124.831K/ $3,600
Schwab:  $100K / $99.28K /$3,172
Vanguard: $25K /$24.044K / $750

Total Principal Amount:  $250K

Total Cost: $248.155K
Total Tax Free Income:  $7,522 (does not include profits/double tax free for me)
Current Tax Free Yield Based on Cost = 3.03%

Tax Equivalent Yield Calculator

For this year, I have to pay a 5% Tennessee state tax on dividend and interest income. There are no other state income taxes. The tax on interest payments after a standard deduction will drop to 4% in 2018; 3% in 2019; 2% in 2020; 1% in 2021 and 0% in 2022. There is no state gift or inheritance taxes.

For a single person with $90K in income, and a 5% state tax rate, the tax equivalent yield would be 4.253% at a 3.03% tax free yield.


Interest rates did decline last Friday: 


10/27/2017 Closing Prices: 


IEF $105.85 +$0.34 +0.32%: iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF 


TLT $123.24 +$0.81+ 0.66%: iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 


ZROZ $114.43 +$1.27 1.12%: PIMCO 25 Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury ETF 


LQD $120.91 +$0.36 0.30% : iShares  Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF 


+++++++++


German federal budget surplus could reach 14 bln euros-magazine

Kissinger: All of Asia Should Get Ready for Nuclear War

The government estimates that third quarter real GDP growth increased at an annualized rate of 3% in the first quarter. This is the first of several estimates. News Release: Gross Domestic Product


White House reiterates Trump's claims that his 12 sexual harassment accusers lied - CNN (Trump: "As you have seen, I am a victim of one of the great political smear campaigns in the history of our country. They are coming after me to try and destroy what is considered by even them the greatest movement in the history of our country." I am still waiting for Trump to sue those ladies as he promised to do prior to the election)

Trump ally Roger Stone's Twitter account suspended after expletive-filled rant - CBS News


While it is to be expected that Trump has an 81% approval rating among Republicans, which is not likely to change much no matter what he does, the worrisome number for the GOP is the 57% disapproval rating among independents. Trump's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Level Yet in New NBC News/WSJ Poll - NBC News


In the Gallup Daily Trump Job Approval poll, Trump's approval rating was at 36% as of 10/27/17. Historically, a President's approval rating is over 50% in the first year: Presidential Job Approval Center


+++++

GOP's Budget Bill:

Congress quietly passed a budget outline with $1.8 trillion in health care cuts - Vox (cuts Medicare spending by $473B over ten years). There is also a trillion dollars in cuts to programs that will be identified at a later time.  

Proposed Senate Budget Is Likely to Leave Millions of Americans Worse Off | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

  

+++++++++

GOP's Secret Tax Plan To Be Revealed Soon: More Collateral Damage to the Middle Class in the Works

Under current tax law, taxpayers in the 4th quintile pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than taxpayers in the top quintile, excerpt for those in the top 1%:



When the specifics of the GOP's secret tax plan are finally released this week, shortly before a vote is scheduled, I will understand more about how the Republicans will hurt the middle class in their effort to help pay for the slash in corporate tax rates and the overall tax obligations of the top 1%.

The key provisions that will cause this shift are:

1. Eliminating the Federal Estate Tax (paid now only by the wealthy);

2. Eliminating all Exemption Deductions;

3. Capping the tax rate at 25% for income received from pass through entities which in practice will reduce the tax rate from the higher marginal rates to 25% while providing no benefit to  all middle class taxpayers who are already in the 25% bracket or lower;

4. Eliminating and/or curtailing other individual deductions and credits including the deduction for state and local taxes, though the GOP may allow property taxes to be deducted when a taxpayer itemizes. Property-tax deduction could help GOP reform bill - POLITICO;

5. Eliminating the AMT;

6. Watch for changes in the deductibility of retirement plan contributions and whether the ostensible top tax rate is reduced to 35% from the current 39.6% (and then to 25% for those operating through LLCs, subchapter S corporation, partnerships, etc.); and 


7.  Reducing Demand for Homes Through "Tax Reform" and Thereby Reducing Home Prices-The Middle Class as Collateral Damage 


Keeping the property tax deduction would help taxpayers who are in high property tax regions and have relatively high mortgage interest payments. If the standard is raised to $24,000, a couple with high numbers in those two categories may still find it advantageous to itemize.  


The national associations for both the home builders and realtors oppose the GOP's plan, because it would take away the benefit of home ownership from too many households. This is an obvious point. 


With the planned for increase in the standard deduction, the National Association of Realtors claims that existing home prices would fall 10%


The doubling of the standard deduction would exceed both the mortgage interest and property tax amounts for a large swath of taxpayers, making the purchase of a home less desirable from a tax viewpoint than under current law. 

Why buy a home, assume a large debt, and all of the other costs and burdens associated with home ownership, when the standard deduction exceeds what the taxpayer can deduct in Schedule B after the GOP's takeaways? It is estimated that only the top 5% will continue to itemize (significant mortgage debt on large homes) Realtors: Don’t penalize homeowners: USA Today


The National Association of Realtors is right that new single family home starts and the prices of existing homes would suffer under the GOP's plan.

That would also have a negative blowback impact on the economy. 

If the 10% loss in a home's value proves to be accurate, and I suspect that it is too low, then that negative impact is just another way for the middle class to pay for  increasing the wealth of the top 1%. That result is pretty sneaky though, and most Trump voters will not have a clue about how x ("tax reform") caused y (decrease in their home's value) by reducing the demand for homes significantly. 

It is also sneaky to reduce the top individual tax rate from 35% (reduced from 39.6% under current law) to 25% by the pass through entity loophole. Very sneaky stuff here. The republican politicians are magicians when it comes to deception. 

2017 Brackets: Married Filing Jointly-Taxable Income



GOP tax plan trashes the value of two popular tax breaks: CNBC

Mortgage interest deduction: GOP tax plan gives a break to renters: USA Today


Tax Reform Ad: Don't Raise Taxes on Middle Class Homeowners | www.nar.realtor

+++++++++

1. Sold 500 SGP:AU at A$4.40:




Profit Snapshot: +A$63




Quote: Stockland (Australia: Sydney)


This eliminates my Australian stock positions denominated in AUDs and bought on the Australian stock exchange. I kept the proceeds in AUDs.


I am becoming concerned about how a rise in interest rates will impact REIT prices.  


I discussed interest rate cycles and REITs here: Update For REIT Basket Strategy As Of 8/11/15/Interest Rate Cycles And REIT Stock Prices - South Gent | Seeking Alpha (scroll to "Interest Rate Movements and REIT Stocks")


2. Long Term Bond Strategy: Tennessee Municipal Bonds:


A. Bought 5 Maury County Tennessee 3.25% GO Bonds Maturing on 4/1/42:


I may make it to this bond's maturity date. This bond was recently sold by Maury County.




EMMA Page


Maury County - Google Maps


Maury County is located south of Nashville. It largest city is Columbia, Tennessee. The county is part of the Greater Nashville Metropolitan Statistical area which is the 36th largest in the U.S.


Credit Ratings (only rated by Moody's):

Moody's at Aa2

Bought at a Total Cost of 98.768

YTM Then at 3.323%
Current Tax Free Yield at 3.29%

Optional Redemption: At Par Value on or after 4/1/26


Security:




Tax Matters:




3. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy

A. Bought 2 Hanmi Bank 1.7% CDs (monthly interest) Maturing on 10/25/19 (2 year CDs):


I had 1 Bank of China .9% CD mature on the day of my purchase. So I reallocated that $1K into a higher yielding and longer term CD that pays monthly interest. 

B. Bought Bank of China 1.2% CD Maturing on 1/28/18 (3 month CD):




The inflow into this basket has gone way down as CD rates have declined as interest rates have gone up. 

While I did not buy this CD to shift income into next year, when tax rates may be lower, CD and bond purchases are one way to move income receipts out of one year into another.  


$3K into Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy

4. Small Ball:


A. Sold Highest Cost 100 Share Lot of FIE:CA at C$7.57 Using FIFO Accounting:





Snapshot of Position Prior to Pare:




So I sold the lot bought on 5/3/17 and kept the other 300 shares.


Profit Snapshot: +C$35




Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Item # 1.A. Bought 100 FIE:CA at C$7.2 (6/1/2017 Post)

Quote: iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF


Sponsor's Website iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF 


Dividend Frequency: Monthly at C$.04 per share


Last Discussed: Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Item # Added 200 FIE:CA at C$7.13 (9/3/17 Post) 


Holdings: 


Currently, my largest individual Canadian stock position, which is owned by this fund, is Toronto Dominion:  




I have a 200 share position in Pure Industrial REIT. I have sold out of Artis and Power Corporation earlier this year.

Prior FIE:CA Trade Snapshots:  


2017 +C$166


2017 +USD $391.32
2014 +USD $58.07 
The last two snapshots are from my Fidelity taxable account where Canadian dollar profits are converted into USDs by that broker.  

B. Bought 10 of PG at $86.99-Used Commission Free Trade:





I am not a fan of this company and have not owned a share for some time. I will buy up to 30 shares in 10 share lots. My next purchase would be the the $82-$83 range. The P/E is currently too high for such a slow grower IMO.


2017 PG Fact Sheet.PDF

Our Brands | P&G

What’s behind Procter & Gamble’s Sluggish Margins? - Market Realist

Quote Procter & Gamble Co

PG Analyst Estimates

The current quarterly dividend is $.6896 per share and was last raised in the 2017 first quarter from $.6695. Splits & Dividend History | P&G Given the low grow rates, I would not anticipate much more than a $.08 per share annual growth in the penny rate, and would not be surprised by less. The payout ratio has been climbing. 


Morningstar calculates that the payout ratio was 50.1% for F/Y ending 6/30/11 and at 74.8% for the F/Y ending 6/30/17.

This is another consumer staple where free cash flow is exceeded by the total amount spent on share buybacks and dividends:


Free Cash Flow F/Y 6/30/17 = $9.527B

Common Stock Purchases = $5.204B Cash Flow for PG
Dividends = $7.236B

Unlike some other consumer staples, PG's long term debt has decreased since 2013. Balance Sheet


Last Earnings Report: P&G Announces First Quarter Earnings

PG uses a fiscal year ending on 6/30. The first quarter for the current fiscal ended on 9/30/17.

The market responded unfavorably to this report.



Free Cash Flow:

Business Segment Information:



Grooming suffered declining revenues, probably due to discount razor companies like Dollar Shave.  

Over the past 3 years, PG has divested more than 100 brands, leaving it with 65 core brands. 


Several beauty brands were sold to Coty in 2016. Procter & Gamble Completes Transfer of Specialty Beauty Business to Coty ("As part of the transaction, P&G retired 105.0 million shares of P&G stock, behind the exchange of 409.7 million shares of Galleria Co., which converted into common shares of Coty. At P&G’s closing stock price on Friday, September 30 of $89.75, these shares represent value of $9.4 billion. In addition, Galleria Co. assumed approximately $1.9 billion of debt in the transaction, the proceeds of which were subsequently distributed to P&G prior to the consummation of the split/merger. The combination of the stock retirement and debt proceeds results in a total value of approximately $11.4 billion.")


The Duracell battery business was sold to Berkshire in exchange for 52M PG shares owned by BRK. P&G Completes Exchange of Duracell to Berkshire Hathaway 


North America accounts for about 44% of total sales.

Analyst Ratings:

GS has a sell rating on PG based in part on that stocks "elevated" valuation: Goldman loses appetite for food stocks, downgrades Kraft Heinz - MarketWatch:




In a September 2017 report, Morningstar rated PG three stars with a $96 fair value estimate. 


In a report dated 10/19/17, S & P rates the stock at 4 stars with a $100 twelve month price target.  


Prior Trades: As far as I have been able to determine, my last two round trips were made in 2009 and 2010: 


2010:50 Shares +$160.05 





Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Item # 6 Sold  50 PG at $63.33 (10/21/2010 Post) 


2009: 130 Shares +$907.12  




In the preceding snapshot, the lowest purchase price was made in March 2009 at $47.59: Stocks, Bonds & Politics (3/17/2009 Post)

Prior to those two trades, my only prior trade since 1/1/2006, which is how far I go back with these snapshots, was this 100 share lot sold in 2006: 

2006: 100 Shares +$227.42




That lot was sold at $57.27 after netting the brokerage commission, on 7/11/2006.   


If I had bought that lot at $57.27 on 7/11/16, and reinvested the dividends, my total annual average return through 10/24/17 would have been 6.97%. DRIP Returns Calculator | Dividend Channel  The SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) had an annual average return of 8.55% over the same period. That difference does mean a significant underperformance and certainly adds up over an 11 year period. The differential is $5,107.24 in favor of SPY starting with $10K in both securities.  


PG Trading Profits 1/1/2006 to Date = $1,294.59


So I am obviously not brimming with enthusiasm about this stock, when my first purchase since 2010 is a 10 share lot with an anticipation that I will be able to average down twice in 10 share lots.


I would opine, however, that a 7% annual average return for SPY would be about 3% higher than I am expecting for the next 11 years, so maybe PG will outperform the S & P 500 over that future time span.   


C. Sold 100 ZRE:CA at C$20.29




Profit Snapshot: +C$45





Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Item # 2.B. Bought 100 ZRE at C$19.82 (Bought 7/13/17 and received 3 monthly distributions totaling C$26.4.  


Quote: BMO Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index ETF 


ETF Products- BMO Asset Management Inc.


I am becoming concerned about the rise in interest rates and REIT prices.  
For both ZRE:CA and FIE:CA, one reason for selling shares was simply to buy some of the CADs back that I recently sold at a higher price. 


A related reason is that my reportable USD profit is lower after the most recent CAD slide while I increased slightly my CAD position. Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Item 1.A. Bought USD$15K Using C$18,747.15 CADs. 


CAD / USD Currency Chart


I still own 150 shares of iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF, which is another Canadian REIT ETF.

5. Intermediate Term Bond/CD Ladder Strategy:

A. Sold 2 VZ 2.45% SU Bonds Maturing on 11/1/22:



Profit Snapshot: +$31.6



Finra Page: Bond Detail

Sold at 98.999
YTM Then at 2.665%
Current Yield at 2.475%

Bought at a Total Cost of 97.319
Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Item 1.C.
YTM Then at 2.967%
Current Yield at 2.52%

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

18 comments:

  1. "Why buy a home, assume a large debt, and all of the other costs and burdens associated with home ownership, when the standard deduction exceeds what the taxpayer can deduct in Schedule B after the GOP's takeaways?"

    People buy homes because they need a place to live and a key component of "the American Dream" has, for generations, been home ownership. I contend that the deductability of mortgage interest is not high on the list of reasons most middle class people want to own their own homes. Renting a home is fraught with costs and burdens of its own, such as: paying for your landlord's equity, with nothing of your own to show for it after months and years of renting; rent increases; neglected maintenance; threat of eviction, landlord decides to sell house and you must move, etc.

    "...most Trump voters will not have a clue about how x ("tax reform") caused y (decrease in their home's value) by reducing the demand for homes significantly."

    I find the reasoning bogus. Demand for homes remains high in my part of the country, irrespective of the deductability of mortgage interest. Demand for homes will be greater in areas hit by flooding, wildfires, and regional economic conditions. I don't believe that demand for homes is significantly driven by the deductability of mortgage interest.

    That being said, I am certainly not a Trump supporter. I'm pretty sure the GOPs proposal to eliminate the mortgage interest deduction will end up on the cutting room floor (so to speak) but not because of its potential adverse impact on the middle class. There are other powerful lobbying interests who will kill it (the NAR being only one of many).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cathie: There is no indication yet that the GOP will tamper with the deductibility of mortgage interest.

      The problem for housing prices arises primarily from doubling the standard deduction and secondarily through eliminating the deductibility of state and local income taxes. I am assuming for now that the GOP will keep the deductibility of property taxes.

      The end of state income tax deduction would result in far more taxpayers claiming the standard deduction which then in effect eliminates the benefit of the mortgage interest deduction.

      Moreover, many middle class homeowners would face higher tax obligations as shown in the Tax Policy Center analysis and those households may find their existing mortgage obligations less easy to finance on an ongoing basis forcing them to sell into a buyer's market.

      Home ownership is trending down already, even with the deductions in place and low mortgage rates and has been doing so since 2004 as shown in this Census Bureau report:


      https://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/files/currenthvspress.pdf

      Homeowners throughout the nation found out in the last decade that home prices can go down and go down a lot, which may explain that trend along with a tremendous rise in foreclosures since 2006.

      In many states, including my own, the borrower is personally liable for any deficiency after a home foreclosure.

      I would anticipate that the home ownership downtrend to accelerate with the passage of the GOP's tax plan even with a provision continuing the property tax deduction. It would just be worse if the property tax deduction was also eliminated.

      Fewer households will be able to afford purchasing new homes when the federal government is not in effect helping the taxpayer(s) to finance the purchase through provisions in the current tax law.

      That problem would be aggravated by a rise in mortgage interest rates and home prices which would also decrease the affordability of home purchases.

      When demand falls, buyers are in the driver's seat as to home prices as a basic tenet of supply/demand economics.

      Couples with children living in non-urban areas would still have non-economic incentives to buy homes. Childless couples and singles currently living in apartments would have fewer incentives to buy and would in many cases find it more difficult to buy given the takeaway of tax incentives. The impact would be greater on lower priced homes than high price ones when the later create tax incentives through a combination of mortgage interest and property tax deductions.

      Delete
  2. Under the outline of the GOP's tax plan, which is the last available publicly released document, it is important to look at how it impacts the middle class homeowner in its entirety.

    The increase in the standard deduction would cause a large swath of middle income households to lose the current tax benefit of the mortgage interest deduction, AND the elimination of the exemption deductions then takes away a substantial part of the increased standard deduction. Each exemption is worth $4,050 in 2017.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "People buy homes because they need a place to live and a key component of "the American Dream" has, for generations, been home ownership. I contend that the deductability of mortgage interest is not high on the list of reasons most middle class people want to own their own homes. Renting a home is fraught with costs and burdens of its own, such as: paying for your landlord's equity, with nothing of your own to show for it after months and years of renting; rent increases; neglected maintenance; threat of eviction, landlord decides to sell house and you must move, etc."

    As someone who has put up with the nuisances of buying, owning, and then selling,my,own home for over 30 years without bothering to even calculate its inestment value, I have to agree with Cathie.

    "I find the reasoning bogus."

    Just for the sake of adding clarity, I'd like to point out that Cathie's second paragraph seems to be dependent on her first, quoted above.

    Thanks.
    David.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Does anyone consider my reasoning to be legitimate rather than bogus, taking into account the discussions in the post and my previous comments?

    The thrust of my point is that the demand for homes will decrease which would cause a significant decline in price as buyers gain the upper hand in negotiations due to the GOP taking away financial incentives connected to home ownership through (1) increasing the standard deduction; (2) then taking away a substantial part of the standard deduction increase by abolishing all personal exemptions currently valued at $4,050 per exemption; (3) eliminating in practice the deductibility of mortgage interest for millions by both increasing the standard deduction and eliminating the deduction for state and local income taxes (assumes property tax deductions stay); and (4) as a consequence making home ownership less affordable for many new home buyers and existing home owners who were able to buy homes based on the tax incentives provided under current law.

    I would note that the National Association of Homebuilders or the National Association of Realtors are opposing the GOP's tax plan with money and influence since it is obvious to them that the plan will hurt millions of existing homeowners and cause a decrease in home prices for both new and existing homes by negatively impacting demand.

    The National Association of Home Builders was hoping to counter the negative impact by having some kind of a credit for mortgage interest payments in the bill, but was rebuff by the republicans:


    http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tax-plan-national-association-of-home-builders-2017-10

    ReplyDelete
  5. My opinions on the issue of demand for homes is probably influenced by my lifelong experience in California, both as a renter and home owner. Yes, prices can and do go down fast, especially with predatory lending practices that caused the most recent (2007-2012) real estate crash. But at least here in the Golden State, housing is definitely still a seller's market.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait until California buyers can no longer deduct state and local income taxes, lose their personal exemptions at $4,050 per exemption and no longer can deduct mortgage interest payments due to the increase in the standard deduction and the loss of the deduction for state and local income taxes. None of those negative events have yet to occur but are only in the GOP's tax plan.

      The many reasons for the Near Depression do include the improvident extension of mortgage credit that inflated housing prices by increasing demand.

      The originators of those loans had no skin in the game since the loans were sold and then repackaged into various creations that few buyers understood and fewer still could value which caused massive problems when the loans started to go sour in large numbers. Many of the borrowers submitted fraudulent loan applications, the "liars' loans" that were so prevalent particularly in California and other hot property markets.

      http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29827248/ns/dateline_nbc-the_hansen_files_with_chris_hansen/t/if-you-had-pulse-we-gave-you-loan/#.WfdwuhNSzuQ

      Delete
  6. "Does anyone consider my reasoning to be legitimate[?]...The thrust of my point is that the demand for homes will decrease which would cause a significant decline in price...."

    It's certainly not impossible. Only time (and politics, and interpretation) will tell.

    From wikiquote.org:
    "The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable."
    Though often attributed to Galbraith, as early as 1988 in U.S. News & World Report, the earliest publications of this statement, in The Bulletin (1984) and Reader's Digest (1985) attributes it to Ezra Solomon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David: I was excluding from my question you and Cathie.

      Delete
  7. A second straight day of declining interest rates has sent regional banks diving some in price.

    U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note
    2.372 -0.04
    Last Updated: Oct 30, 2017 at 2:16 p.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd10y?countrycode=bx

    SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE)
    $56.84 -$1.01 (-1.74%)
    As of 2:16PM EDT

    I did sell HOPE last Friday at $19 and will be discussing that transaction in about a week or so.

    In my next post, I will discuss the elimination of BDGE (109+ shares) at $35.33 based on my negative opinion about the third quarter report. The total cost per share was $19.05. I did just receive the 4th quarter dividend payment of $.23 per share:

    Dividend History:
    http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/bdge/dividend-history

    I quit reinvesting the dividend a long time ago.

    Earnings Report:
    http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/10/25/1153608/0/en/Bridge-Bancorp-Inc-Reports-Third-Quarter-2017-Results.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. During the day, it was reported that the GOP was considering phasing in the corporate tax reduction over 5 years.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-30/house-said-to-consider-five-year-phase-in-for-corporate-tax-cut

    If true, it would indicate that the GOP is having difficulties raising tax revenues elsewhere to meet its target.

    This kind of problem was made worse when the GOP's tax writing committee elected to keep the property tax deduction as a salve for congressional republicans from high tax states.

    The non-Democrat, interest group opposition is just starting to gear up for a fight. It looks like the plan will receive zero Democrat votes which limits the amount of republican defections to 3 in the Senate and slightly over 20 in the House. (250 republicans/218 votes to pass) There are 28 House Republicans from the highest tax states — New York (9), New Jersey (5) and California (14). However, there are a lot more from states with state income tax rates exceeding 5%.

    https://files.taxfoundation.org/20170727103114/FISCAL-FACT-No.-544-State-Individual-Income-Tax-Rates-and-Brackets-for-2017-PDF-UPDATE.pdf

    ++++++

    Merck (MRK): I do not currently own MRK shares having sold my remaining shares at $65.28:

    Item # 2.B.
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2017/02/observations-and-sample-of-trades-umpq.html

    My disposition of that lot was a good thing.

    Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)
    $54.70-3.54 (-6.08%)

    The stock closed at $61.99 last Thursday.

    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MRK/history?p=MRK

    Whenever I discussed buying MRK, the primary reason was its cancer drug Keytruda. While Keytruda revenues did soar Y-O-Y, MRK unexpectedly withdrew a European marketing application for using Keytruda with chemotherapy drugs as an initial treatment for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. Several analysts downgraded the stock arguing the Keytruda revenue growth story, which is key for MRK, has been derailed.

    Maybe that is overly pessimistic but investors are buying into the rationale for their bevy of downgrades.

    My main problem is that too many other important drugs are showing Y-O-Y declines in revenues due to competition or to expiring patent protection. That trend requires more heavy lifting from Keytruda and that is the real problem IMO.

    When looking a drug company earning's report, it is important to look at the Y-O-Y revenue increases and declines. That information can generally be found in the earnings press release and in the 10-Q.

    Addendum to Press Release: Table 3b
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/310158/000110465917064143/a17-24456_1ex99d2.htm

    The two diabetes drugs, which are major to MRK, experienced slight declines in revenues over the past 9 months. Combined worldwide revenue was $4.371B over the 9 months ending on 9/30/17 and $4.6B over the same 9 period ending 9/30/16.

    Y-O-Y declines are seen in a number of other drugs.

    Notwithstanding all of that, I am monitoring MRK daily now as a potential buy in 10 share lots, averaging down only and at predetermined price ranges, and stopping at 30 shares provided the news and price trend remains unfavorable.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Since no one has come forward saying my reasoning is not "bogus", I would just make what I consider an obvious point which I will make in my next post as well:

    The GOP's intent is clearly revealed by the result which is not difficult to understand. It is purposeful because it is so blatantly obvious.

    The negative impact on home prices from the GOP's tax plan, as currently outlined, is a clear cut issue as well. Demand for home purchases will be curtailed and prices will decline in localities most impacted by the removal of tax incentives connected to home ownership.

    The negative impact will be largely felt in states where there is a meaningful state and local income tax that could no longer be deducted and where the combined total of property tax and mortgage interest rate payments is less than the increased SD.

    Then the affordability issue is further negatively impacted by taking away most of the increased SD through the exemption deduction elimination. The plan could not possibly be clearer on its intended negative impact on the middle class.


    ReplyDelete
  10. OP - I would agree with your point, that if the mortgage interest deduction goes away, it will negatively impact home values/prices. Though there are limits in place for the deduction already (such as being capped at $1 million of debt).

    I mean, I could turn around and ask the people that disagree why so many borrowers got foreclosed upon during the 08-09 crash that had ARM mortgages. As it appears that it was a function of both too much debt and too high of payments when the rates reset. Are they stating that interest rates have no impact on real estate prices? As I see it, the mortgage interest deduction will directly reduce the cost of the mortgage for people that currently itemizing, and if real estate acts in a bond like manner, the resulting value of the real estate should go down when the interest rate increases (if the deduction is eliminated).

    In addition, I did see a post this morning from the Trump administration saying that they weren't considering a 5 year phase in of new corporate rates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some examples of how the GOP plan works in practice:

      Couple with No Children:
      Current Law:
      State and Local Income Tax $15K
      Property Tax $15K
      Mortgage Interest $10K
      Exemptions: $8.1K
      Total Deductions $48.1K

      GOP Plan:
      State and Local Income Tax $0
      Property Tax $15K
      Mortgage Interest $10K
      Exemptions $0
      Total Deductions $25K (barely over the new SD of $24K)

      Couple loses $13.1K in deductions

      Same Numbers as Above Except the
      Couple has 2 Children and are ineligible for the child tax credit
      Current Law Deductions: $56.2
      GOP Plan Deductions: $25K

      The GOP plan uses the middle class as a source of tax revenues to fund in part tax cuts for the rich and corporations.

      There are two main ways this occurs.

      First, the plan will cause many taxpayers to lose the benefit of deductions for mortgage interest and state income tax payments since the SD increase will be higher than the combined total of property tax and mortgage interest payments which still could be deducted. Then, in a separate line item, the benefit of the SD is largely taken away by the exemption deduction elimination.

      The second way is to take away the state and local income tax deduction that lowers the deduction amount for those who would still benefit from itemizing but then they are hit again with the exemption deduction elimination.

      There will also be losers in particular categories, like single parents who lose their child exemption deductions and who make too much to qualify for the child tax credit or most of it. The negative impact would be concentrated mostly in upper middle income households who live in states that collect an income tax on earned income.

      Tennessee does not have a tax on earned income or profits from the sell of securities and other assets and property taxes are low. Since I have no debt, I have not been itemizing for as long as I can remember.

      The GOP's plan would cause me to lose the extra SD for those over 65 which is $1,550 for a single person over 65 or $2,500 for married couples filing jointly who are both over 65.

      The SD this year for a single person over 65 is $7,850 and the personal exemption would be $4,050. Together, those items total $11,900 or $100 less than the proposed increased in the SD.

      https://www.efile.com/tax-deduction/federal-standard-deduction/

      So no tax benefit and potentially a tax loss even for that single person over 65 in a low tax state due to other takeaways.

      The impact on housing prices will be negative and predictable within a range. The negative impact will be greatest for middle income priced homes located in high tax states.

      Delete
  11. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (OHI)
    $28.4 -$2.57 (-8.31%)
    As of 10:19AM EDT.

    I do not like this REIT, and have given a number of reasons supporting my negative opinion in prior posts. The problems are obvious and should be as well to SeekingAlpha authors who gush with enthusiasm for this stock including Brad Thomas.

    I will trade the shares, having bought my first lot in December 2013 near the end of that year's interest rate spike.

    My last two transaction were to sell shares, bringing my total exposure down to 44+ shares with an average cost per share of $29.34.


    6. Pared Omega Healthcare:
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2017/10/observations-and-sample-of-recent.html

    Item # 5.A. Sold 107 out of 188+ Shares at $34.55+:
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2017/07/observations-and-recent-trades-bgeprb.html

    Realized Trading Gains = $1,346+

    The problem with the number #5 tenant, Orianna (f/k/a New Ark Investment, Inc.) has gotten worse.

    "FFO for the third quarter of 2017 includes $194.7 million in impairments on direct financing leases related to our Orianna Health Systems (“Orianna” and f/k/a ARK) portfolio . . . We believe that for some of the Orianna facilities new operators may be able to improve occupancy and reduce expenses; however, based on current facility performance, we anticipate that the current annual contractual rent of $46 million will likely be reduced to a range of $32 million to $38 million once the transition process is complete. . . . The transition timing is expected to take approximately six months."

    "The Company is in active discussions with Orianna regarding the transition of some or all of their remaining portfolio to new operators. In July 2017, the Company transitioned nine Orianna SNFs in Texas to an existing operator of the Company. The nine SNFs were added to the existing master lease with that operator. The Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $194.7 million related to its remaining direct financing lease portfolio with Orianna. The Company also recorded approximately $11.9 million of provision for uncollectible accounts during the third quarter of 2017."


    "The $46.8 million loss of FFO for the three-month period ended September 30, 2017 includes the impact of $194.7 million in impairment on direct financing leases, $11.9 million in provision for uncollectible accounts and $3.9 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense."

    OHI reduced guidance for FFO and AFFO:
    "The Company's Adjusted FFO guidance for 2017 ... assumes the Company will not be recording revenue related to its Orianna portfolio for the fourth quarter of 2017."

    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171030006258/en/

    There is also an oblique reference to the loss of revenue from a non-top 10 operator:

    “We are lowering our 2017 guidance to reflect the temporary loss of third and fourth quarter 2017 revenue primarily related to placing Orianna and a non-top ten operator on a cash basis.”

    The earnings call transcript is not yet available. Possibly more bad news will be revealed after management receives pointed questions from analysts. I will need to read that transcript before making any decision to nibble and at what price.






    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stifel downgraded OHI to hold from buy this morning and reduced its price target to $29 from $35.

      My consider to sell range has been lowered to $29 to $30. I am reinvesting the dividend on my remaining 44+ shares.

      I do not yet have a consider to buy range since I am waiting to review the earnings call transcript. The range would be lower than the current price, possibly as low as $25 to $26, and that would be just a 10 share lot using a commission free trade.

      Delete
  12. Packaged food company stocks are doing better today based on the earnings report released by Kellogg:

    Kellogg Company (K)
    $62.70 +$3.83 (+6.51%)
    As of 10:45 A.M. EST

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/maggiemcgrath/2017/10/31/kellogg-stock-popping-7-after-earnings-surprise-the-street/#b15a4b54d595

    Yesterday, as part of my 10 lot buying spree, I placed two orders for packaged food company stocks: GIS and K. I did not receive a fill on K but did buy 10 GIS at $50.7.

    The 10 share buying program is limited to out-of-favor stocks and/or stocks that have suffered recent meaningful price declines. I use only commission free trades and will only average down in 10 share lots.

    General Mills, Inc. (GIS)
    $52.17+1.52 (+2.99%)

    Campbell Soup Company (CPB)
    $47.67 +$1.31 (+2.83%)
    As of 10:49AM EDT.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2017/10/observations-and-sample-of-recent_31.html

    ReplyDelete