Friday, August 24, 2018

Update for Portfolio Positioning and Management as of 8/23/18

My last update was published on 7/27/18.

Vix Asset Allocation Model: Stable Vix Pattern 


This model was developed in the Spring of 2007 as one among many timing devices. The first signal given by the model was a Trigger Event in August 2007 that terminated a Stable VIX Pattern and ushered into existence the Unstable VIX Pattern. VIX Chart from 2007: Alerts and Triggers Major Disruption of Cyclical Stable Bull VIX PatternVix Charts from 2004 2005 2006 Stable VIX Patterns Phase 1 and Phase 2Trading Strategy Under The Vix Asset Allocation Model: Part 1 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha

There has been much celebration about the S & P 500 breaking its longest bull winning streak last Wednesday. The dramatic wall of worry that stocks scaled to become the longest bull market, in one chart - MarketWatchBull run

This calculation starts with the low point in the last bear market cycle, which occurred on March 9, 2009 and continues the count until there is a 20% decline from the high.

There are problems and issues problem with the count. In 2011 summer, the S & P 500 came very close to declining 20%. Another bad day or two before the market started its upswing could have restarted the count then, and this move would not be the longest. 

Another issue is that the count started after a major bear smashup. 

The S & P 500 index did not surpass its October 2007 high point until 2013. 

The total annual average return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), which includes reinvesting the dividends, starting on 10/10/07 through 8/23/18, was 7.87%. DRIP Returns Calculator | Dividend Channel 

That return is below the long term average. 

And, if I go back to March 31/2000 as my start date, SPY's annual average total return unadjusted for inflation was 5.39% through last Thursday. The period covered by that calculation was 18.5 years. 

So there is a problem when there is this much chop. In retrospect, an investor needed only to make a few correct timing calls to produce far superior total returns. 


The first and second decisions would be to sell in the 2000 Spring when investors had obviously lost their marbles and to buy five year treasury notes. 


Then the third and fourth decisions would be to sell the treasury notes and buy back stocks sometime in 2002. 


The next two decisions would be to sell the stocks in the late summer or early fall 2007 and use the proceeds to buy the 5 year treasury note again. 


Then the last two decisions would need to occur the Spring or early summer of 2009, where the investor sells the 5 year treasury notes and buys back stocks when it became obvious that financial armageddon was not going to happen. 


While the VIX Asset Allocation Model was still in an Unstable VIX Pattern then, the VIX was coming down and the S & P 500 pierced its 200 day SMA line to the upside in June 2009.   

So that is 8 decisions over 18.5 years. 

I could cut it to 4 correct decisions give or take a few months by eliminating the five year treasury buys and just allow the stock proceeds to fall into a sweep account until redirected back into stocks.  

One thing about those decisions is that many of them were in plain sight at the time. 


The 2000 valuations were off the charts and became reasonable only after a 50% haircut. The economy was fine in 2002-2003 so the haircut was primarily a market reset to correct excessive valuations. 

The rot in the housing market was in the news throughout 2007 as the market moved to new highs. Then I also had the Trigger Event sell signal in August 2007. 

The decision in March 2009 to reallocate into stocks was not that hard given the almost 60% decline top to bottom and the then obvious fact that a financial collapse was not going to happen with governments and central banks doing what was necessary to keep the world from sliding into another long term Great Depression.  


At the moment, my two most important indicators, both technical and related to market dynamics, are still flashing green. The VIX is in a Stable Vix Pattern that can only be terminated by a Trigger Event and the S & P 500 is trading above its 200 days SMA line. 


I am ignoring that green light since I can. 


I do not need to stay invested in stocks to meet my financial goals, so I have substantially dialed back my risk. I would not be anxious to have another buying opportunity after another 50%+ collapse in the S & P 500 holding a meaningfully large stock position for me. 


My dollar allocation to long term and high quality Tennessee Municipal bonds is close to my total stock exposure including mutual funds. The stock exposure may be around 10% of investable assets and monetary exposure to all individual stocks in isolation is meaningless to me. I am trying to generate additional income and some trading profits, but the overall amounts are not that important to me in their totality. 


I am using a small ball buying approach using commission free trades to buy most common stocks. This is my current list with the lowest price in the chain shown for each stock: 




The count that led to the recent longest record is to be distinguished from a long term bull market in stocks that can be interrupted by a cyclical bear markets (usually no more than 1). The prior long term secular bull stock market started in August 1982 and lasted until the Spring of 2000. There was a one day bear market in October 1987 that interrupted the count. 

The Bull Market Is Really Old. Does That Mean It’s at Death's Door?

The foundation for a long term stock bull market includes low interest rates and low inflation. Interest rates remain abnormally low in the U.S. 

Inflation is benign for stocks, even though it has recently ticked up due in large part to an increase in energy prices. 

The S & P 500 is valued well above historical norms using traditional valuation metrics other than the estimated forward 12 month non-GAAP E.P.S. and the FED Model. Those traditional valuation metrics flashing caution are the Schiller and the TTM P/E ratios, the price to sales ratio, market cap to GDP, and Tobin's Q.  Three Metrics Of Stock Market OvervaluationMarket Cap to GDP: An Updated Look at the Buffett Valuation Indicator - dshortWhat are valuation indicators and which indicators are the best – Bull Markets (has several helpful charts on the various indicators) 

Longer term bonds are a bit dicey now too which is why my weighting is substantially into short term maturities and the low end of my intermediate term bond ladder. 

A graph of the entire bond/CD ladder would have a huge bump to account for the 2018-2020 maturities and then a  slide starting in 2021 which picks up steam in 2024-2026, followed by another surge up with the Tennessee municipal bonds. 

The bond market was in a long term secular bull market starting in 1981-1982 and probably ending in July 2012. This may become evident in future years, looking back at the past. 


The ten year treasury closed on 7/25/12 with a 1.43% yield that this long term secular bull market in U.S. bonds ended in July 2012, with the ten year TIP trading well into negative yield territory that month. 

The fact that there have been bond rallies since that time would not change the conclusion that the directional trend has been up in yields and down in prices. 

We can now date the last long term secular bond bear market as starting around 1950 after the FED ending a period of rate manipulation and ending in 1981-198210-Year US Treasury Note Yield Since 1790 - Business Insider200 years of US interest rates in one chart

For the first fifteen years or so of that earlier 31 to 32 year long term bond bear market period, investors may have remained modestly comfortable with bonds. There was not a huge upswing in yields after the market reset to higher rates after the FED ending its abnormal monetary policies that had anchored the 10 year treasury yield at abnormally low levels for several years. (see Before the Accord: U.S. Monetary-Financial Policy, 1945-51) Inflation numbers were milder then compared to now for the most part through the 1950s and early 1960s. 

The massacre of the Bond Ghouls started to gather steam in the late 1960s with the 
coup de grâce administered throughout the 1970s and into 1981. So looking back from 1960, I doubt that I would have dated the commencement of the long term bear market in bonds as being in 1950 as I do now. I would have so dated the start no later than 1970 if I had then addressed the issue. 

My approach is to trade intermediate term corporate bonds and to use the proceeds to buy primarily higher quality corporate bonds maturing in 2020. I can pick up more yield with those bonds than I can in the 10 year treasury now. 

As I mentioned in a recent post, the treasury yield curve is really flat from 2 years to 30 years: 

Treasury Rates
2018 Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates

Only a slightly higher yield is obtained by going from a 2 year treasury out to one maturing in 30 years.  

If longer term rates continue to trend down, I have a significant weighting in long term and high quality Tennessee municipal bonds that would be going up in price. If short term rates continue to rise, I have short term securities maturing just about every day now that can be redirected into higher yielding short term bonds and CDs.      

The last long term bear market in bonds, which is seared into my memory banks, is a bogeyman waiting to be let loose again on those that have never experienced one.  When is a matter of debate. If is not the question.

One  possible future course would be a gradual market reset to higher interest rates as central banks gradually exit their extraordinarily abnormal monetary policies, thereby freeing bond investors for the first time in over a decade to set rates free from their heavy hands using traditional metrics like a normal spread to anticipated inflation over the debt's life and credit quality. 

Then something else would come into play, possibly with a long delay after the reset to normalized rates, which is what occurred in the 1950s after another abnormal period of Fed intervention. Instead of a major bloodletting, it would be like a series of paper cuts until something really major and predictable now as a possible scenario. 

For example, hyper inflation in a major economy caused by failed sovereign debt auctions and a monetization of the debt by the central bank causing a collapse in that nation's currency.  Just give it some time.  

My timetable for the U.S. government's Day of Reckoning is currently in the 2028-2035 time frame. All of this is out-of-sight and out-of-mind at the moment.  

9 comments:

  1. "My dollar allocation to long term and high quality Tennessee Municipal bonds is close to my total stock exposure including mutual funds. The stock exposure may be around 10% of investable assets..."

    I am curious about your asset allocations. Are you saying your portfolio is invested 10% in stocks, 10% in bonds, and 80% in cash or cash equivalents?

    And just a general question: Given the current financial environment, what would you consider to be a reasonable asset allocation for a retired person whose first priority is capital preservation?

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cathy: I am talking about investable money that is lodged in brokerage and mutual funds accounts. There exists other funds held in different types of accounts to pay expenses. I have two mutual fund accounts, where I own stock and balanced funds, with the larger one at T. Rowe Price and the other at Vanguard.

      These are approximate numbers for investable funds: 10%+ in longer term and high quality Tennessee Municipal Bonds; 10% or so in stocks including stock mutual funds; 15% or so in cash primarily in my Vanguard money market accounts where I receive 2%+, and the remainder in investment grade corporate bonds, bank CDs and treasuries bought in brokerage accounts, equity preferred stocks and exchange traded bonds. The ladder two categories are probably around .5% to 1%. The heaviest exposure by far is to investment grade corporate bonds with most of that exposure at BBB+ or higher. I am buying those virtually everyday. The weighting in those investment grade corporate bonds is daily up to 3 years from now.

      Earlier today, I bought 2 Arizona Public Service senior unsecured bonds maturing in January 2020. That purchase brought my principal amount maturing in that month up to $36K.

      Next month, I have $59K in short term investment grade corporate bonds, treasuries and FDIC insured bank CDs maturing and then $43K in October and $53K in November in those categories.

      So this is pretty conservative.

      The market would probably have to go down 50% from current levels for me to work my stock allocation up to 25%-30%.

      Delete
    2. Hello southgent,

      Hope you are well.

      I see the market getting near all-time high with the Schiller and Buffett indicators as you mentioned at overvalued levels.
      For those of us who need a significant stock allocation, I think clearly there are two more federal funds rate hikes in 2018 and so far according to the dot plot, there will be three rate hikes in 2019.

      So at the end of 2019, the median federal fund rate will be somewhere around median 3.4% from what I have read.

      The Vix asset allocation model is still flashing green as you mentioned. In the past two significant stock selloffs, i.e. 2000 where price earning ratios were manically high and in 2007 when subprime home loans were being distributed everywhere, these were clear indications of stock market danger;

      I wondered what your take was on the Fed continuing to raise rates to keep inflation in check?

      Aside from all the political handwringing and geopolitical tariff noise, I don't see anything at present except overvaluation as a danger. I wondered what your thoughts about the rise of the next recession and stock market anticipation of this due to the Fed's raising rates at least five times in the next 1 1/4 years?

      Thanks, Sam

      Delete
    3. Sam: The over valuation issue has been mitigated somewhat by the slash in corporate tax rates. The FED Model still has a good to go signal as well.

      The stock market can have a correction based primarily on market dynamics including a valuation reset or some kind of scare which causes a major anxiety attack without changing the fundamentals except in the short term.

      The dangers are usually easily identifiable.

      I do not see a gradual increase in short term rates from one abnormally low level to another as having a material impact on the real economy. I doubt that the FED will raise the FF rate by .25% four times between now and next June. Three such raises is my best guess now and only one with a trade war accelerating into the December meeting and then into 2019.

      The main danger now that is related to fundamentals, meaning earnings and earnings growth, is the tariff war. The FED is right to be concerned about how a continuation and acceleration of this war will impact the U.S. economy.

      Inflation could continue to move higher than the market anticipates that will cause the FED to become aggressive which has not happened yet. It is hard to say how much more inflation would turn the FED into a clearly non-accommodative and aggressive posture. Some Y-O-Y number in the core PCE price index over 3% would spook them IMO. Then you could see a FF rate that would meaningfully slow the economy.

      There is some concern now that China's economy is slowing.

      The general and most important bogeyman is too much debt. The next recession could become worse than normal due to massive defaults in a world awash in historically high debt levels. That would result in a pullback in lending by commercial banks which causes more defaults and so on. Governments may not be able to replace private spending with increased government spending due to their own debt problems, which also then accelerates the downturns due to a massive imbalance of supply with declining demand. Hard to say when that will hit the fan but it bears watching when GDP numbers turn negative and unemployment rates increase at a rapid rate.

      In other words, the cure for the last debt bomb explosion involved spending massive amounts of new debt, which probably just postponed the day of reckoning and created a far more powerful debt bomb to explode later.

      Delete
  2. I would emphasize that investment plans and allocations need to be tailored to each individual's needs. What I am doing is applicable to me.

    There are several considerations that enter into my plan's development:

    (1) I am not greedy

    (2) I do not spend a lot of money

    (3) I have no debt

    (4) I live in a low cost state where there is no earned income tax and only a small tax on certain interest and dividend income that will soon be gone

    (5) I live in Brentwood, TN, a suburb of Nashville, where property taxes for both the city and Williamson County are about $2,300 per year on a house worth $500K. Both Brentwood and Williamson County have AAA bond ratings.

    (6) My health insurance costs went down about $600 per month when I became eligible for Medicare and a Medigap policy from Blue Cross Tennessee and

    (7) I have assets outside of my brokerage accounts that can be used to fund current expenses.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I mentioned the FED Model a few times here and provided a link or two in the post.

    This is a pdf link to Ed Yardini's charts on the FED Model:

    https://www.yardeni.com/pub/valuationfed.pdf

    Explained:

    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/08/fed-model.asp

    ReplyDelete
  4. South Gent,

    Re " ..... I have short term securities maturing just about every day now that can be redirected into higher yielding short term bonds and CDs."

    I bought a number of short term (1-2 months) CDs today. These CD's carry coupons from 1.75% to 1.85%, which is 50% to 70% higher than similar short term CD's at the beginning of the year. But I think you can get even better yields from Treasuries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: You could do slightly better with treasuries by participating through Fidelity in an auction. The treasury does not auction a 2 month bill but the 13 week will be auctioned next Monday and then there is a 4 week bill next Tuesday.

      The one month treasury bill rate is currently at 1.954%:

      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd01m?countrycode=bx

      Fidelity will have an order box ready sometime on Monday for that 4 week bill. You can find it in the individual bond section under new issues. You can place an order now for the 13 and 26 bills.

      The 3 month treasury bill rate is up to 2.107%:

      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd03m?countrycode=bx

      You have to go much further out in time, usually to around 2 years, to find CDs that have higher yields than comparable treasuries.

      The CDs and bonds that I have maturing have various durations. Next week, I have $15K in principal amount maturing that starts off with a Bank of Montreal bond that was bought last January and then a 9 month CD with a 1.4% coupon that is paying interest monthly. The current highest 9 month CD is 2.15% at Schwab. The six month treasury bill is at 2.263%.

      So short term rates will be higher for maturing CDs with similar maturities but the banks are not paying enough for the shorter term maturities given the squeeze in their net interest margins.

      A two year treasury note will be auctioned next Monday with an expected yield now being at 2.59%. You can pick up 2 year CDs that pay monthly at 2.8%.

      Delete
  5. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/08/observations-and-sample-of-recent_26.html

    ReplyDelete