Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: EAE, FDUS, GAINL, HTPRD, SDIV

Economy:

The first quarter is shaping up so far at close to zero real GDP growth. Atlanta Fed GDP tracker shows next to no growth for first quarter


The government's initial estimate of 4th quarter real GDP growth was released last week and showed a better than expected 2.6% annualized rate. Gross Domestic Product, Fourth Quarter and Annual 2018 (Initial Estimate) | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) This estimate will be revised in the coming weeks.  


If that number holds through subsequent revisions, the real GDP growth rate for 2018 would be 2.9% .


++++

Markets and Market Commentary

The stock market is looking tired to me after its recent parabolic spike off the low hit last Christmas Eve.  


Largest Cuts to S&P 500 EPS Estimates in Four Years for First Half of 2019

I have not looked for several weeks at the current SPX E.P.S. estimates for 2019. Those estimates still show decent growth that is primarily backloaded into the second half with the second quarter showing a big jump from the first quarter (data from S & P):



The estimated GAAP E.P.S. for the 2019 first and second quarters was 72.48 as of 2/28/19 compared to the actual 67.07 GAAP number for the first six month's last year. That is still decent growth of about 8%, but the 2019 estimated number is backloaded into the second quarter with the first quarter estimated at a 3.66% Y-O-Y increase.

If you actually compared next year the 2019 actual numbers with the estimated ones above, you will be doing something that the Stock Jocks never do as they cleanse their memory banks with stale information that is more than a few days old.

I do compare the forward 12 month E.P.S. forecasts (GAAP and Non-GAAP) with the actual numbers, and the result proves IMO that the forward 12 month estimates are unreliable and overly optimistic.

Take this past comparison as just one example:



Update For Portfolio Positioning And Management As Of 7/24/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


+++++++

Trump

The investigative journalist Jane Mayer has published an article exposing Trump TV. Among the new revelations is that Fox knew about the Stormy Daniels matter before the election and spiked the story written by reporter Diane Falzone. The Making of the Fox News White House | The New Yorker  Donald ranks the Trump TV anchors by how loyal they are to him. 


Mayer also claims that Trump ordered the DOJ to stop the AT & T-Time Warner merger. Report: Trump asked Cohn to block AT&T/Time Warner merger - CNN 


There have been several media reports in the past that Trump wanted to condition U.S. approval on Time Warner jettisoning CNN, possibly to Rupert Murdoch who would then Foxify CNN as another Trump propaganda machine adhering to the Putin playbook. 


Trump TV is not a place where journalists can be found. 


Trump TV radicalizes the right, usually with false and misleading information and has become "the closest we’ve come to having state TV” as noted by Nicole Hammer, author of Messengers of the Right: Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics (Politics and Culture in Modern America)


Donald has proved once again that lying works in American politics: President Trump has made 9,014 false or misleading claims over 773 days - The Washington Post  


Fordham confirms that Trump team threatened the school if his grades became public - MarketWatch 


Why would the Stable Genius object so strenuously to having his grades released unless they would show that the Stable Genius was more of a Doofus Don in high school and college rather than the smartest person in the history of the universe since the Big Bang. 


I would not object to having all of my grades published.  


Trump ordered that the professionals in charge of security clearances to reverse their refusal to grant one to Jared Kushner. 


The then Chief of Staff, General Kelly, wrote a protective memo stating that he was ordered by Trump to give Kushner a security clearance. Trump Ordered Officials to Give Jared Kushner a Security Clearance - The New York Times 


Trump also ordered a security for Ivanka. President pressured staff to grant security clearance to Ivanka Trump 


The question is not whether Trump has the power to grant a security clearance but his willingness to follow the processes designed to protect the national interest. He is not willing to do so. 


When engaged in widespread and persistent voter suppression efforts, republicans imagine the existence of voter fraud to justify what is really just pure realpolitik-keep those who vote the wrong way from voting or making it difficult and time consuming to exercise this constitutional right that they give up trying to vote.  

However, when confronted with an actual case of voter fraud, they remain strangely silent. North Carolina Republican operative charged in election fraud scheme | Reuters 


Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge - The New York Times

Matthew Calamari went viral after the Cohen hearing. He’s real, and he loves Trump. (a former bodyguard and the kind of guy who was destined to go far in the Trump organization since the Duck only hires the best people or so the Trumpsters tell me)   

Andrew Wheeler, former coal lobbyist, confirmed to lead EPA - CNN Since climate change is a hoax perpetrated by China on the gullible U.S. Liptards, as Don the Demagogue claims, then there is nothing to worry about when a coal lobbyist replaces the climate denier Scott Pruitt as the Director of the Environmental Protection Agency. 


Donald is contemplating appointing a panel of climate change deniers to question the generally accepted science on man made global warming. Trump to set up science panel to counter his own government's climate change consensus, officials say - Chicago TribuneEvery Insane Thing Donald Trump Has Said About Global Warming 




The latest WSJ/NBC poll shows that Donald is supported by 88% of republicans. Trump maintains strong approval ratings with GOP ahead of 2020 Even now, only 27% of republicans believe that Obama was born in the U.S. No amount of proof can convince them to change their non-fact based opinions or to replace their reality creations with accurate information. It is not even worth the effort to try. 


+++++++


Portfolio Management


I am continuing to use the rally to sell my highest cost lots, focusing on higher risk yield investments which includes all BDC common stocks and equity preferred stocks.  


It is not relevant to me that the profits are small, since I am reducing risks in a manner consistent with my overriding capital preservation objective while increasing yields by lowering my average cost per share and freeing up capital for later redeployment in the same or similar securities.   


For the most part, I anticipate in the coming weeks and months redeploying proceeds from maturing short term bonds and CDs into purchases of treasury bills, mostly bought at the auctions. 


New purchases of treasury bills maturing in the 2019 4th quarter will be in the $50K to $60K range, consisting of 3 and 6 month treasury bills bought at auctions. The reallocation will start in April with a 6 month treasury bill purchase. 


I will also be buying three to five 1 year treasury bills at auction every month.  


Given the flat yield curve, I will not be buying treasuries maturing in 2021 or later. 


I am addressing a potential decline in interest rates primarily through my ownership of Tennessee municipal bonds which I will hold until maturity or early redemption by the issuer. My weighted average tax free yield in those bonds is 3%, with a weighted average total cost at below par value. 


Generally, I will pick up slightly more yield by buying short term treasuries at auction rather than in the secondary market. 


I am buying some treasuries in the secondary market as fillers in my short term bond ladder. 

  
++++++++++

1. Pares and Eliminations:

A. Pared GAINL-Sold Highest Cost Lot at $25.64:


I sold my highest cost lot using FIFO accounting.


History:


Quote: Gladstone Investment Corp. Preferred Series E Stock (GAINL)-A BDC


Closing Price Yesterday: GAINL $25.35 -$0.09 -0.35% 


Profit Snapshot: $19.97




Item # 1 Bought 50 GAINL at $25.14-Used Schwab Commission  Free Trade (10/17/18 Post)


I kept the 50 share lot bought at $24.18: Item # 3 Bought 50 GAINL at $24.18 (1/23/19 Post)


Security Description:


Issuer: Gladstone Investment Corp. (GAIN)

Prospectus
Par Value: $25
Coupon: 6.375%
Dividends: Monthly at $.1328+, Cumulative & Non-Qualified
Last Ex Dividend Date: 2/19
Maturity Date: 8/31/25
Issuer Optional Call Date: On or after 8/31/20

I will consider repurchasing shares at less than $22.


I view equity preferred stocks issued by BDCs to be risky. 


I am uncomfortable owning a preferred stock issued by a BDC, particularly when the yield is lower than 8%. I do not believe the yield on GAINL is adequate compensation for the risk.


BDC loans are junky, and they pay out their net income to common shareholders as dividends. Consequently, there is no cash cushion for the preferred shareholders.


The main benefit of this preferred stock is that it has a maturity date which is highly unusual. 


Dividend Yield at new average cost of $24.18 = 6.61%


I include snapshots of all fixed coupon equity preferred stocks in this Gateway Post: Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity REIT Cumulative Equity Preferred Stocks (trading profits 2008 to date = +$11,910.58)


This entire niche category is viewed with disfavor which dictates small positions and frequent trading. It has been difficult for about 5 years to generate profits from this type of security given the prices and optional call features. 


Snapshots of equity preferred floating rate stocks are in a different Gateway Post: Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity Preferred Floating Rate Securities (start date 2008, trading profits = +$23,642.44)


Everything is structured and has categories, strategies and rules. 


Strategy: Small Ball (the next purchase has to be below the lowest price paid in the chain which is currently $24.18)


Almost all common stock purchases now are part of the small ball purchase restriction. 


B. Sold 50 of 100 HTPRD in Roth IRA Account at $22.39:

Quote: Hersha Hospitality Trust 6.5% Cumulative Preferred Series D Stock


Issuer Website: Hersha Hospitality Trust


Recent History this Roth IRA Account:



I kept the lot purchased at $20.11. Item # 1.A. (12/26/18 Post)

Yield at $20.11 = 8.08%


Profit Snapshot: +38.49




Item # 1.B. Bought 50 HTPRD at $21.34-In a Roth IRA Account (11/11/18 Post)


Security Description:

Strategy: Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket

Category:Equity REIT Cumulative Equity Preferred Stocks
Issuer: Hersha Hospitality Trust Cl A (HT)
Par Value: $25 Final Prospectus Supplement
Optional Call Date: On or after 5/31/21
Cumulative Dividends: Yes
Stopper Clause: Yes  
Dividends: Paid Quarterly
Last Ex Dividend Date: 12/28/18 
Maturity Date: Potentially perpetual subject to issuer's call right
Qualified Dividends: No, pass through entity

HTPRD Trading Profits to Date: $351.98 ($313.49 in prior trades)


Prior Sell DiscussionsItem # 1.A. Sold Last 50 HTPRD Shares at $25.85 (10/9/17 Post)Item # 2 Sold 150 HTPRD at $25.8  (9/18/17 post)


Total Current Position All Accounts: 150 shares


Hotel REIT preferred stocks generally have higher yields compared to other REIT preferred stock sectors.


They are perceived to be riskier due to their lack of long term leases and greater sensitivity to economic cycles.


When investors become concerned about a recession on the near horizon, which was the case in the 2018 4th quarter and last January, the hotel REIT preferred stocks will generally go down more than other REIT sectors. 


Within the Hotel REIT sector, some of the preferred stocks will be riskier than others due to higher leverage. Two examples would be my recent buys of AHTPRI and BHRPRD. Item 1.C. Added 20 AHTPRI at $18.52-Used Commission Free Trade  (12/29/18 Post)Item 1.B. Bought 30 AHTPRI at $21.86-Used Commission Free Trade (12/26/18)Item # 1.A. ,Bought 50 BHRPRD at $20.02 (1/20/19 Post)


The yield differentials will frequently reflect the differences in perceived credit risks.


The BHRPRD yield at $20.02 is 10.3% for example, or around 4% higher than a BBB+ rated REIT preferred stock like those issued by Public Storage (PSA).


Close to the time that I bought those two hotel preferred stocks, I bought 50 shares of PSAPRE, rated at A3/BBB+. (12/29/18 Post). The yield at my $20.58 total cost was 5.95%.


C. Pared FDUS-Sold 52 Shares at $15.15:




Quote: Fidus Investment Corp.-A BDC

Website: Fidus
SEC Filings

Closing Price Yesterday: FDUS $15.55 -$0.10 -0.64% 

I sold the highest cost lot and 2 of the highest cost shares purchased with dividends.


I kept the lower cost shares including the purchases discussed in this post: Item # 4.A. Bought 50 FDUS at $13.87 and 30 at $12.63 (12/19/18 Post 


I discussed the third quarter earnings report in that post.


This transaction reduced my average cost per share to $13.46 from $13.83:


Profit Snapshot: +$32.88




Item # 1.C. Bought 50 Fidus at $14.43-Used Commission Free Trade (6/14/18 Post)
FDUS 1 Year Chart

Dividend: Regular quarterly dividend at $.39 per share


Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) Dividend Date & History - Nasdaq


Dividend Yield at Total Average Cost Per Share: 11.59% (excludes special dividend payments in the calculation)


In the 2018 4th quarter, the company paid a special dividend of 4 cents per share.


Next Ex Dividend Date: 3/7/19


Dividend Reinvestment: Yes, but may turn off when price exceeds $16


Current Position: 84+ shares


Maximum Position: 150 shares


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule


Lowest Price in Current Chain: 30 shares at $12.63


Net Asset Value Per Share History:


12/30/18: $16.47

9/30/18:  $16.41
3/30/18   $16.28
12/31/17  $16.05
12/31/16  $15.76 
12/31/15  $15.17
12/31/14  $15.16
12/31/13  $15.35
12/21/12  $15.32
IPO at $15 June 2011

Given this net asset value per share history, I am willing to continue dividend reinvestment at a lower discount than I would for a BDC whose net asset value per share is in a persistent decline.  


Last Earnings Report: I would label this report as a good one for a BDC. 




This report was released after I sold the shares. Fidus Investment Corporation Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Financial Results 


2. Intermediate Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy

A. Bought 2 Brookfield Asset Management 4% SU Maturing on 1/15/25


FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus not linked)



Credit Ratings: 


BAM's senior unsecured debt was rated A low by DBRS or an A- equivalent to S & P.  DBRS Confirms Ratings of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. at A (low), R-1 (low), Stable Trends -DBRS (6/25/18) 

Bought at a Total Cost of 99.238 (includes $2 commission)
YTM at TC Then at 4.146%
Current Yield at TC = 4.0307%

When moving into intermediate and longer term bonds, I much prefer to have the current yield close to the YTM so that I am capturing most of the YTM in semi-annual interest payments.

3. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:


A. Bought 2 HCP 2.625% SU Maturing on 2/1/20:




I now own 6 bonds and will not buy more.


Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Issuer: HCP Inc.

2018 Annual Report (debt maturity at page 96)

HCP Reports Fourth Quarter and Year Ended 2018 Results


HCP, Inc. (HCP) CEO Tom Herzog on Q4 2018 Results - Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha


Credit Ratings:




Bought at a Total Cost of 99.833

YTM at TC Then at 2.804%
Current Yield at TC = 2.6294%

B. Bought 2 J.P. Morgan 2.55% SU Maturing on 10/29/20-A Roth IRA Account:




FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus not linked)


This is another example of a bond roll. I have 2 JPM bonds maturing on 3/22/19. I am rolling the anticipated proceeds into the 10/29/20 maturity, keeping my exposure in this account to $4K as of 3/22/19:




Issuer: JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

JPM Analyst Estimates

Credit Ratings:




Currently, I am willing to take my JPM SU bond exposure up to $15K. I also own several JPM CDs.


Bought at a Total Cost of 99.499  (includes $4 Vanguard commission)

YTM at TC Then at 2.855%
Current Yield at TC = 2.5628%  
Paid 99.299 YTM at that Price then at 2.977%

C. Bought 1 WFC 2.6% SU Maturing on 7/22/20:




I now own 3 bonds.


FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Issuer: Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC)

WFC Analyst Estimates

Credit Ratings:




Bought at a Total Cost of 99.62

YTM at TC Then at 2.877%
Current Yield at TC = 2.61%

4. Swapped 50 Shares of SDIV for 50 Shares of EAE


The rationale for this swap was my opinion that the EAE price rise is close to its high point while SDIV may provide a total return in excess of its superior yield to EAE. 


A. Sold 50 EAE at $24.73




Quote: Entergy Arkansas Inc. First Mortgage Bonds 4.75% Series Due June 1, 2063 (EAE)

Closing Price Yesterday: EAE $25.00 

Profit Snapshot: $93.7



EAE is an exchange traded baby bond which trades flat on the stock exchange.

Prospectus


Credit Ratings: A2/A-


Security: First Lien on substantially all of issuer's assets

Par Value: $25


Coupon: 4.75% on a $25 par value


Yield at the new TC of $23.66 = 5.019%


Interest Payments: Quarterly


Last Ex-Interest Date: 2/27/19 (shortly before I sold the 50 share lot) 




The brokers refer to the payment as a dividend but it is interest. 


Optional Call Date: On or after 6/1/18


Maturity: 6/1/63, unless redeemed early at the issuer's option


Asymmetric Interest Rate Risk: As with other exchange traded bonds, interest rate risk is asymmetric in favor of the issuer. 


If interest rates decline so that it becomes advantageous for the issuer to redeem at par value, then the owner is left with the proceeds to reinvest at a lower coupon. 


If interest rates rise, the issuer would be just pleased to let the owners hold the bond that is going down in value. 


This bond, with its potentially long maturity date, has a ton of interest rate risk. 


I am not currently concerned by the credit risk.


I am in a hyper trading mode for potentially long duration exchange traded first mortgage bonds due to their interest rate risk. 


Purchase Discussions for 50 share EAE LotBought 20 EAE at $21.6-Used Schwab Commission Free Trade (10/7/18 Post)Item # 3.A. Bought 30 EAE at $23.66-Used Schwab Commission Free Trade (9/16/18 Post)


If I had in abundance commission free trades at Schwab, and I currently have none left, I would have the highest lot bought at $23.66 and kept the lowest cost lot bought at $21.6. That kind of small ball is no longer economical when the commission rate is $4.95.


B. Bought 50 of the ETF SDIV at $18.51-Now Commission Free for Schwab Customers




Quote:  SDIV Fund - Global X SuperDividend ETF Overview

Sponsor's Page: SuperDividend® ETF
Expense Ratio: .58%
SDIV Morningstar Page: Currently Rated 2 stars

Closing Price Yesterday (ex dividend): SDIV $18.41 +$0.16 +0.85% 


Top 10 Holdings as of 2/28/19: 




Dividends: Monthly




Using the last monthly penny rate of $.1352, the yield is about 8.77% at a total cost of $18.51 per share. 

Last Ex Dividend Date: Yesterday, 3/5/19 (shortly after purchase)


Dividend Reinvestment: Yes  


Current Position This Account: 103+ shares 


Total and Maximum Position All Accounts: 150 Shares + Shares purchased with dividends


Last DiscussedItem # 2.C. Bought 10 SDIV at $17.8-Used Commission Free Trade at Fidelity (1/16/19 Post)Item # 2.B. Bought 10 SDIV at $18.89-Used Commission Free Trade (11/18/18 Post)


Since I can now buy this ETF commission free at both Schwab and Vanguard, I will not longer use one of my Fidelity commission free trades to buy.  


This fund has historically had subpar performance compared to the S & P 500 even with the reinvestment of SDIV's much higher dividends to buy additional shares.    


Prior EliminationItem # 2  Sold 105+ SDIV at $22.54 (8/3/13 Post)

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

14 comments:

  1. Currently, the one year treasury bill has a 2.551% yield.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd01y?countrycode=bx

    The two year treasury note is at 2.52%:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd02y?countrycode=bx

    The 3 year is at 2.502%:
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd03y?countrycode=bx

    The 5 year is at 2.5%:
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd05y?countrycode=bx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm surprised that Vang is paying 2.4% or 2.6% in their holding mutual fund. It's so close to what they can earn.

      Delete
    2. Land: Most of my uninvested cash is held in the Vanguard Prime Money Market fund that currently has a 2.45% yield.

      https://personal.vanguard.com/us/FundsHistoricalReturns?FundId=0030&FundIntExt=INT#tab=0

      That fund can not be used as a sweep account. I use the Vanguard Federal MM fund for my sweep accounts at that broker which currently yields 2.33%:

      https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/profile/VMFXX

      The reason why the yields are higher for Vanguard MM funds compared to other money market funds is that Vanguard has a lower expense ratio. The Federal MM fund has a .11% expense ratio while the comparable Fidelity fund which can be used as a sweep account has a .42% expense ratio.

      https://fundresearch.fidelity.com/mutual-funds/summary/31617H102

      Delete
    3. That fund ratio is sure making a difference. I've got to consolidate my funds there. Discover that's been my high yield is not at that level yet.

      Delete
    4. Land: One problem with money market funds is that their yields may have already peaked in this interest rate cycle. Those funds are able to maintain a $1 net asset value by keeping maturities short. The short maturities have already started to decline slightly in yield and would decline more when and if the Fed decides to cut the federal funds rate. As securities mature, higher yielding securities have to be replaced with lower yielding ones when short rates are declining. It was not that long ago that MM funds had near zero yields.

      Delete
  2. TransAlta Renewables Inc. (RNW.TO)
    C$12.70 +C$0.33 (+2.67%)
    As of 12:49PM EST

    I own both the Toronto listed ordinary shares (150 shares) and the USD priced shares traded on the U.S. Grey Market (100 Shares)

    TransAlta Renewables Inc. (TRSWF)
    US$9.47 +$0.24 (+2.57%)
    As of 12:44PM EST.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TRSWF/?p=TRSWF

    This one was bought primarily as a bond substitute.

    Last Discussed:

    Item # 2.A.
    A. Bought 50 RNW:CA at C$12.45 (C$1 IB Commission):
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/07/observations-and-sample-of-recent_12.html

    At least this one is up today in response to its earnings report.

    https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/transalta-renewables-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2018-results-and-provides-outlook-for-2019-898767375.html

    Dividends are paid monthly.

    https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/transalta-renewables-declares-dividends-838360072.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. THL Credit (TCRD) finally cut its quarterly penny rate as expected, but it may not have been expected that this would happen before the third quarter due to external manager's waiver of its incentive compensation until then.

    The new announcement is that the external manager will waive the incentive fee throughout 2019 and will also "lower the base management fee to more closely align with what it believes is appropriate for a first lien floating rate portfolio."

    The new quarterly rate is $.21 per share, down from $.27. Prior to today, the consensus estimate of the new rate after it was slashed was $.20 or $.21 per share.

    This announcement was made in connection with its earnings report:

    http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/06/1749171/0/en/THL-Credit-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-2018-Financial-Results-and-Announces-Adjustment-of-Quarterly-Dividend-to-0-21-Per-Share.html

    "Net investment income totaled $7.3 million and $8.7 million for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017, or $0.23 and $0.27 per share based upon 32,515,187 and 32,673,590 weighted average common shares outstanding, respectively."

    Over 2018, the net asset value per share declined from $10.51 per share as of 12/31/17 to $9.15 as of 12/31/18.

    That is pathetic of course, but some of the 4th quarter decrease may be attributable to price declines in the overall leveraged loan market rather than price declines due to credit risks for individual issuers. I have seen those kind of markdowns discussed by managers of other BDCs during their respective conference calls.

    You can see what I am talking about when pulling up a one year chart for the ETF BKLN and look at the swan dive in the 2018 4th quarter. These high risk loans will not fare well in price when recession fears heat up and/or the stock market is in one of its high volatility phases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wasn't expecting it this fast. I hadn't sold. I will be, in the next few months (waiting for a rally in general market). I don't think all the drop is built in yet.

      Delete
    2. Land: I would recommend reading the TCRD earnings call transcript:

      https://seekingalpha.com/article/4247126-thl-credit-inc-tcrd-ceo-christopher-flynn-q4-2018-results-earnings-call-transcript

      It appears to me that the dividend cut was already priced into the stock. However, there is no confidence in the external managers to turn things around, as shown by the comments of two money managers during that conference call starting at page of the transcript (e.g. Leon Cooperman and later David Miyazaki starting at page 10)

      It is possible that the company has hit rock bottom until the next recession rolls around, which will negatively impact all BDCs. There are still some loans that are in the "iffy" stage.

      Delete
    3. Will do. Yes, the cut is priced in. There was a drop but no enough to create a picture that something had happened.

      Yes, I need to leave these BDCs before the recession comes. I need to bite the loses and find better investments. This is a new conclusion for me. However, I'm waiting for a market exuberance to lighten up. And there may be a rally off of a a waiver agreement.

      Delete
  4. "TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2018 Financial Results"

    https://seekingalpha.com/pr/17436099-triplepoint-venture-growth-bdc-corp-announces-fourth-quarter-fiscal-year-2018-financial

    This was a good report considering the headwinds faced by BDCs in the last quarter, which I discussed in my previous comment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello SG,

    I wanted to ask you how you are concerned about this present market; whether we are in a debt fueled state that has the potential to make a mild recession look like a monster.

    I looked at your earnings estimate data

    If you postulate earnings of $175 for year 12/19 and use 75% of this number given for analyst over exuberance( from fact set) then a 15 p/e multiple takes the SP to @ 1968;

    I know you are buying 1 year treasuries. Is this that you believe the next move in rates is down? And what range do you think about for S&P in the next few years?



    PS, any thoughts about this; you have said the national Debt is a " kick the can" problem, but what I am worried about is not just a slump, but something unforseen like subprime, that surprises the market, like poor debt standards?

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-will-end-poorly-says-jp-morgan-strategist-about-a-boom-in-arcane-debt-on-wall-street-2019-03-06

    thanks




    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. G: The yields for 1 to 7 year treasuries suggest a concern about a recession within 12 to 18 months that will force the FED to lower the FF rate. Currently, the expectation is for no change in the FF rate through January 2020:

      https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/countdown-to-fomc.html

      The probability of a .25% rate decrease is at 14% which is higher than the 3.9% probability of a .25% increase by that meeting.

      The one year treasury gives me a yield that is only 5 basis points lower than the 7 year based on yesterday's closing yields.

      https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2019

      I am also buying in the secondary market some treasuries that mature in April-June 2020.

      The bond ladder strategy is based on the premise that no one really knows what will happen to interest rates. So I am playing multiple possible future scenarios with that strategy.

      Growth through spending massive amounts of debt will (1) end badly; (2) make it far more difficult or even impossible for the federal government to deal with the next severe recession; and (3) has diminishing positive impacts for the U.S. economy given its size. So, yes, it will end badly (and at some point catastrophically), but the question is when. The Stock Jocks will have to see it happening before reacting in a non-temporary way.

      As to S & P compilation of the earnings estimates, they are frequently ridiculously optimistic. Yet, on 12/31/19, notwithstanding the estimates being way off for 2018 using the actual numbers, you will see the Stock Jocks say that the market is fairly valued or undervalued since it was selling, as of 12/31/19, at 14 -16 times estimated 2020 non-GAAP estimates.

      This game will rinse and repeat for as long as interest rates and inflation remain low and the U.S. continues to experience real GDP growth of 2%+. The game will end when the economy is irrefutably entering a recession.

      The Marketwatch article discusses one corner of the debt market called leveraged loans, mostly to private companies. BDC loans would be part of that market. Those loans will experience far greater defaults in the next recession and they are generally much higher now than the national average for bank charge-offs. That is one of many reasons why I am always light in my BDC exposure and will trade frequently using the small ball strategy.

      Delete
  6. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/03/observations-and-sample-of-recent_10.html

    ReplyDelete