Sunday, March 3, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: ADX, GDO, GOOD, PGX

Economy

More evidence of an ongoing slowdown was released after my last post. 


End of the Trump bump? ISM manufacturing joins host of indicators that are at lowest level since election - MarketWatchManufacturers grow at slowest pace since Trump’s election, ISM finds - MarketWatch The ISM manufacturing numbers are still positive however.


Limiting state and local tax deductions to hurt 11 million taxpayers, government report shows - MarketWatch 


In the coming years, more middle class taxpayers will be hurt by the tax increase legerdemain engineered by republicans that changed how inflation adjustments to brackets and other items are calculated in a manner detrimental to taxpayers. IRS inflation adjustments will diminish tax cuts | Accounting TodayThe Way Tax Reform Changed the Inflation Calculation - TaxAct Blog 


While the tax cuts will be nominal for most households that currently benefit from the GOP's tax reform legislation, the GOP takes away that nominal benefit over time through this kind of subterfuge. Trump’s fake middle-class tax cuts are dead - Vox  

One recent estimate is that close to 40% of middle income households will fall near or below poverty level during their retirement years. 

Downward_Mobility_in_Retirement .pdf


Markets and Market Commentary

Fed's Kaplan says it will take time to see how much U.S. economy is slowing | Reuters I discussed this issue in my last post. 


This Stock Market Rally Has Everything, Except Investors - The New York Times (Companies bought $240B of their own shares last quarter. Goldman Sachs estimates that $700B in cash will be used this year to buyback shares)

Warren Buffett says 'prices are sky-high' in Berkshire annual letter Warren may not want to do another Kraft-Heinz type deal with an overrated hedge fund. I would note that Buffett's partner in the Kraft deal, an outfit called 3G Capital, sold 20.6 million Kraft shares at $59.85 last August. Kraft Heinz shares fall after 3G Capital trims stake



+++++++

Trump

Janet Yellen: Trump has 'lack of understanding' of Fed and economy

Demagogue Don thought that the following comment from Spike Lee was racist: “The 2020 presidential election is around the corner. Let’s all mobilize. Let’s all be on the right side of history. Make the moral choice between love versus hate.”



The stock market did not react, nor should it have to Cohen's testimony. Michael Cohen Accuses Trump of Expansive Pattern of Lies and Criminality Cohen's testimony will not change anyone's opinions about Trump.  


The fact that Trump is a thoroughly repulsive person, a liar, a racist and a con artist is not news to those who have not been brainwashed and conditioned to ignore accurate information. 


The Trumpsters are just incensed that Cohen was even allowed to testify before Congress about Trump and apoplectic that Cohen was scheduled to testify on the day of Donald's photo op summit with Kim. Trump and Kim abruptly cut short summit after failing to reach nuclear deal
North Korea rejects Donald Trump's explanation of Kim Jong Un summit collapse, says no demand for "entirety" of sanctions to lift - CBS News 


That summit occurred even though Trump had no path to resolving the standoff, believing instead that he could charm Kim into giving up his nuclear arsenal. 

Kim did receive in the prior summit a cessation of U.S. military exercises with the South Koreans and wanted to see how much he could get from Donald without actually doing anything that was strategically important and verifiable.  

Cohen did not produce documents to corroborate key parts of his testimony, though there were several checks produced showing Cohen being reimbursed for the Stormy Daniels hush money payment that directly implicates Donald in a campaign reporting violation.  


Cohen testified that he was present when Roger Stone called and informed Trump that Stone had just talked to Julian Assange about the email dump about to occur. There is no publicly known corroboration to that Cohen testimony. 


If true, and that is a big if, it would suggest that Trump was using Stone as the go between with Wikileaks who was the Russian funnel for the stolen emails that were released shortly before the election in Russia's effort to swing the election to Trump. 


The main question for the Stock Jocks is not what happens to Donald.   


The issue for them is whether Donald will take down the republican party in 2020, causing the GOP to lose the presidency, the Senate and the House. Currently, that outcome is not being priced into stock prices. 


Then, if that in fact happens, there would be nothing stopping the Democrats from passing their own "tax reform" package in the same manner as Mitch McConnell used to bypass the Senate's filibuster rules. The movers and shakers in the stock market will not like the result. 


++++

1. Eliminations and Pares:

A. Eliminated PGX-Commission Free for Schwab Customers:

Quote: PGX Fund - Invesco Preferred ETF Overview
Sponsor's Website: Invesco
Dividends: Monthly


Includes Prior Elimination
Profit Snapshot: $45.46



Last Sell DiscussionsItem # 2  Sold 100 PGX at $13.65 (9/14/13 Post)Item # 5 Sold: 200 PGX at $14.38 (11/12/2010) (note the prices which highlights the problem)

Closing Price Yesterday: PGX $14.43 +$0.07 +0.49% 

I view this ETF as a temporary repository of cash earning almost nothing in my Schwab account. 

B. Eliminated GDO-Sold 224+ at $16.47-Used Commission Free Trade:



Quote: Western Asset Global Corp Defined Opportunity Fund Inc.  (GDO)- A leveraged global closed end bond fund

Closing Price Yesterday: GDO $16.65 +$0.02 +$0.12% 

Profit Snapshot: +$79.28



Note the disallowance of a $.33 loss triggered by selling the shares bought with the last monthly dividend payment at loss which is just another example of a ridiculous tax rule.

Recent Buy Discussions (all purchases were commission free):  Item # 4.A. Bought 10 GDO at $14.83  (1/23/19 Post)Item # 1.B. Bought 15 GDO at $15.17 and 15 at $14.99(12/12/18 Post)Item # 4 Bought 10 GDO at $15.44 and 10 at $15.29 (11/11/18 Post);  Item # 1.A. Bought 15 GDO at $15.89 and 10 at $15.64 (10/21/18 Post); Item # 1.B. Added 15 GDO at $16.25  (9/30/18 Post)Item # 1.C. Bought 15 GDO at $16.27-Used Fidelity Commission Free Trade (9/16/18 Post)Item # 3.A. Bought 10 GDO at $16.39 (8/22/19 Post).

This series of average downs was caused by a re-entry price that turned out to be too high based on subsequent events. Item # 2 Bought 50 GDO at $17.01 and 10 at $16.82-Used Commission Free Trades (2/22/18 Post) Those lots were sold at a loss.

Sponsor's Website: WA Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund Inc. | Legg Mason

Data Date of Sell (12/19/19):
Closing Net Asset Value Per Share = $17.59
Closing Market Price = $16.54
Discount: -5.97%
Average Discounts:
1 YR  -9.17%
3 YR  -7.9%
5 YR  -9.1%

Sourced: GDO- CEF Connect

One trading guideline is to consider buying when the discount is greater than those averages and to consider selling when the discount is lower, provided the shares can be sold profitably and several dividends were received.

SEC Filed Shareholder Report for the Period Ending 9/30/18

Dividends: Monthly at $.101 per share (currently)

Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC Announces Distributions for the Months of December 2018, January and February 2019

It is not unusual for me to sell some GDO shares at a loss when eliminating the position:


2017 Fidelity Elimination +$90.97


2012 Fidelity Elimination +$310.24
Other Round-Trips:

2017 Taxable-Schwab Elimination:


2017 GDO 287+ Shares $75.19
IRA Accounts:


2011 Roth IRA 250 shares +$65.78


2013 ROTH IRA 120 Shares +$340.33
Rationale: Basically, I did not like the steep decline after I decided to restart a position. The recent uptrend is due to a decline in interest rates and a removal for now the concern about rising short term borrowing costs.

Overall, I decided that I disliked an unleveraged stock CEF less than a leveraged bond CEF and used part of the proceeds to buy 100 ADX discussed below. 

C. Pared GOOD First by Eliminating Position in Schwab Account:

History this Account:
Quote: Gladstone Commercial Corp. (GOOD)

Closing Price Last Friday: GOOD $20.43 -$0.21 -1.02% 

Profit Snapshot: +$93.59



Item # 3.A. Bought 50 GOOD at $19.4-Used Schwab Commission Free Trade  (8/8/2018)

My highest cost lot was in this account. After I decided to sell it, there was no reason to keep the shares bought with the dividends so they were sold as well.

5 Year Chart as of 2/19/19 (date of sell)



Dividends: Monthly at $.125

Gladstone Commercial Corporation Announces Monthly Cash Distributions for January, February and March 2019

Sold on monthly ex dividend date (2/19)Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) Dividend Date & History - Nasdaq

Next Ex Dividend Date: 3/19/19

Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 4.B. Added 10 GOOD at $17.7-Used Commission Free Trade (1/9/19 Post)Item # 4.A. Bought 10 GOOD at $18.35 and 10 at $18.15-Used Fidelity Commission Free Trades (10/24/18 Post) I still own those shares

D. Sold Highest Cost GOOD Lot in Fidelity Account-30 Shares at $21.36 (used commission free trade):



Quote: Gladstone Commercial Corp. (GOOD)

Profit Snapshot: +$71.74



GOOD Position Before Pare: Average Cost per share = $18.42




GOOD Position After Pare: Average Cost per share = $17.9

Website: Gladstone Commercial | Monthly Dividend REIT

Dividends: Monthly at $.125 per share ($1.5 annually)

Dividend Yield at Remaining TC per share = 8.38%

Last Ex Dividend Date: 2/19/18
Next Ex Dividend Date: 3/19/18

Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) Dividend Date & History - Nasdaq

Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule

Lowest Purchase Price in Chain (excluding shares purchased with dividends) = $17.7 (10 shares bought on 12/19/18: Item # 4.B)

Dividend Reinvestment: Stopped with the last dividend based on price. Will consider restarting when the price is less than $18. 

Current Position this Account: 31+ shares

Maximum Position: 100 shares

Last Earnings Report:

Gladstone Commercial Corporation Reports Results for the Fourth Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2018

Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) CEO David Gladstone on Q4 2018 Results - Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha

Gladstone Commercial Corporation 2018 Q4 - Results - Earnings Call Slides - Gladstone Commercial Corporation (NASDAQ:GOOD) | Seeking Alpha

2. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:  

A. Bought 3 Six Month Treasury Bills at Auction:  
IR= 2.527%

Auction Results:


B. Bought 1 Treasury 1% Coupon Maturing on 9/30/19:
YTM = 2.49%

I now own 8 treasuries that mature on 9/30/19. This is the only one with a 1% coupon. I view the YTM as the only important yield number when the maturity is relatively close. 

3. Intermediate Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:

I exchanged 2 Vodafone 2022 SU bonds for 2 W. P. Carey 2026 bonds that have a higher YTM and current yield. Shortly after selling the VOD bonds, Moody's downgraded the debt one notch to Baa2. Moody's downgrades Vodafone to Baa2; negative outlook 


A. Sold 2 Vodafone 2.5% SU Maturing on 9/26/22



Profit Snapshot: +$28.42



Item Item # 5.A. Bought 1 VOD 2.5% SU at 95.094 (12/19/18 Post)

FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)

Issuer: Vodafone Group PLC ADR (VOD)
VOD Analyst Estimates
Investors

Credit Ratings: Baa2 Moody's; S & P BBB+
Fitch Affirms Vodafone at 'BBB+'/Stable on Announced Liberty Global Transaction

Proceeds at 98 (after $2 commission; sold at 98.1)
YTM at 98 = 3.092%
Current Yield at 98 = 2.551%

I still own 2 VOD 2.95% SU bonds maturing in 2023. Item # 4 B. Bought 1 VOD 2.95% SU at 97.605 TC (4/19/18 Post)Item # 1.B. Bought 1 VOD 2.95% SU at 98.253 TC(3/13/17 Post)

B. Bought 2 W P Carey 4.25% SU Bonds Maturing on 10/1/26:



Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus not linked)

Issuer:  W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC)

WPC SEC Filings
10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/18

Last Bond Offering (10/18): Prospectus (2.25% SU-€500M)

Credit Ratings:



Bought at a Total Cost of 99.682
YTM at TC Then at 4.299%
Current Yield at TC = 4.2636%

I prefer to high the YTM and current yield close together when buying bonds with longer durations.

I own two WPC bonds maturing in 2025. Item # 4.A. Bought 2 WPC 4% SU Bonds at 98.477 (4/19/18 Post)

I sold 2 WPC bonds maturing in 2024: Item # 4.D. Sold 2 WPC 4.6% SU Bonds Maturing on 4/1/24 at 105.382 (10/2/2017 Post)(profit snapshot = $62.15); Bond Detail

I also still own 30 shares of the common bought at $59.45. South Gent's Comment Blog # 7: Bought 30 WPC at $59.45 (12/10/16 comment)W. P. Carey Inc. Increases Quarterly Dividend to $1.03 per Share

4. Bought 100 ADX at $14.12-Used Commission Free Trade:



Quote  Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc. (ADX)-A CEF
Fund Sponsor's Webpage: Adams Funds

Closing Price Last Friday: ADX $14.22 +$0.09 +0.64% 

Top Ten Holdings as of 12/31/18:




Expense Ratio: .56%

Portfolio Value as of 9/30/18 = $1.958+ B
Cost as of 9/30/18 = $1.257+B

Not Leveraged

Data Day of Trade (2/20/19):
Closing Net Asset Value Per Share: $16.51
Closing Market Price: $14.1
Discount: -14.6%
Average Discounts:
1 YR -14.31%
3 YR -15.12%
5 YR -14.85%

Distributions: This fund will pay out a quarterly dividend of $.05 per share and then will meet or exceed its 6% managed distribution level through a year end capital gains distribution.



Sourced from: Adams Diversified Equity-CEF Connect (formerly known as Adams Express)

The discount remains stubbornly in the 14% to 16% range.

While many explanations can be offered, the two main ones IMO are the lack of an aggressive buyback strategy when the discount exceeds 10% and an unusually large unrealized capital gain number which new purchasers tend to discount as a potential tax liability since their ownership postdates the stock acquisitions that created the unrealized capital gains. The latter consideration seems misplace to me since ADX only nibbles at harvesting those gains to support its managed distribution policy each year.

I am playing with the house's money on this buy taking into account only the stock profits and excluding the capital gain distributions and dividends received over the years since 1984 when I first purchased shares.

Adams Express was one of the few CEFs that survived the 1929 stock market crash and the Great Depression. The leveraged ones were gone by 1932 when the DJIA had fallen over 80% from its 1929 peak. Some of that history is recounted in The Great Crash 1929 by John Kenneth Galbraith which is a book that I recommend reading.

Last EliminationItem # 2.C. (3/4/17 Post)

Trading Gain 2/1/14 to Date: +$3,060.14

The largest recent realized gains were these pares:






Since I sold my the 467+ share position in May 2015 at $14.01, I have traded 100 share lots. The total return over the past 3+ years since May 2015 has been tied almost entirely to the year end capital gain distributions paid in 2015-2018 ($4.48 per share), secondarily to the income distributions and a slither to share price appreciation.  
When buying this stock CEF now, success is defined as harvesting a year end capital gain distribution and exiting the position at a profit.  
DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

15 comments:

  1. So there is a slow down happening according to data you've spotted. Is there other data that's heating up? What does this slower data mean? Does it mean a slow down is definite, or can this work it's way out by next quarter & it'd be a shame not to do some investing here & miss on a future expansion?

    There aren't recession indicators (such as yield inversion.)

    On politics, the lack of including a DNC win, isn't relevant until mid-next year or Nov. A DNC win will probably let more professionals do their jobs (such as Fed), and the economy will improve from that.

    I see a few possible paths. One is Trump gone & a different GOP candidate. I don't think Trump is a guarantee, even if a reasonable possibility. I don't think DNC will use the override feature even if they have control of both houses. They'll do discussion on a tax bill. But they will roll back the more ridiculous of the new tax cuts (like write offs for private jets) one way or another.

    I like safety net programs, especially for children, who deserve, and stay out of prison better if fed during childhood. I don't like wealth re-distribution programs. How the elections go will make a big difference in how far into re-distribution (what's called socialism) legislation goes.

    I know you're in bond & preservation mode. I wish you were in buying stock mode so I could learn. If it's fun, you could pick a stock once in a while write about it, even if you aren't buying.

    Rep. Omar has spent today pushing her antisemitism. It's getting scary... that too many buy into it and don't get it. She's still on the Foreign Affairs committee. This is a person who, viewpoints aside, is belittling, demeaning, and writing & making off the cuff tweets and remarks. She's not professional before you get to topics. She has no idea how to build bridges.

    My concern though is what's happening in the economy? We haven't hit the euphoric phase... so is this just a nothing, worth ignoring?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: The yield curve has already inverted in places, but has barely stayed above inversion when it is measured by the ten year treasury yield spread over the two year.

      The inversions so far have occurred along the 1 to 7 year maturity spectrum. For example, the 3 year treasury closed 1 basis point lower in yield than the 1 year last Friday. Earlier the 1 year was providing a greater yield than the 7 year. If you look at the treasury data this year, which can be found in the following link, you will see several on and off again inversions in that maturity range. The yield curve is basically really flat.

      https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2019

      So I would not say that this recession indicator is flashing the all clear, since there have been inversions and the curve has flatlined. This recession indicator is still on the table and a matter of concern as a possible recession predictor within a 12 to 18 month time period.

      The Atlanta FED's GDP model is pointing currently to almost no real GDP growth this quarter. The reading now is at .3%:

      https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx

      By slower growth, I am anticipating real GDP growth of 1.75% to 2.25% growth this year down based on an assumption that the China trade dispute is resolved this quarter with a lifting of tariffs, otherwise I would lower both the top and bottom of those ranges some depending on how far in the future those issues remain as they are now.

      I believe that the tax cuts will spur profits far more than the real economy and the Y-O-Y impact to profits is gone. The bonus comparison was 2018 over 2017. The wealth gap will expand and be on steroids for several more years.

      The engine of growth, consumer spending by the middle class, will not be fueled by the crumbs given to them; and many middle income households will be paying more as many are now finding out.

      Household debt is increasing, and is now significantly above the levels that existed during the credit bubble period, as more households find it necessary to fund their spending through that means.

      If the first quarter GDP is negative or slightly positive, then there may be a significant negative reaction to a continued weak period extending through the spring. So I think the second quarter numbers will be more important than the first quarter which has been the weakness over the past several years and has already been identified as likely being weak again.

      When and if the Democrats control all 3 branches, I do believe the Democrats will end some tax loopholes, raise corporate taxes several per cent for larger companies, lower middle class taxes more than the republicans, and tax the rich significantly more than under current law.

      I doubt that Donald will have any serious opposition during the republican primaries. and he will be the Republican nominee, if he is healthy. He may even win a second term if the Democrats go to far left with their candidate. The coastal liberal politicians do not understand the big middle, America's Heartland, and what makes it tick. Over the past couple of weeks, Trump's approval rating has gone up, now down.

      Delete


    2. Hello SG, I wonder if there is a way to to parse the data on Net Worth to look at the middle class; and If u think this article has any merit?

      thanks

      https://seekingalpha.com/article/4244983-fooling-investors-third-time

      Delete
    3. G: The article presents part of the bear case which has factual merit when examined in isolation. That does not mean that the conclusions drawn from the limited data presented will prove to be prescient. Hasn't Gary been a bear for a long time?


      I share his opinion that the flat yield curve, plus the multiple inversions within the 1 to 7 year maturity range so far, indicate that the FED's next move will likely be to cut the FF rate in response to a slowing economy.

      I would generally agree with his assertion that there are limits to debt fueled growth and there are probably significant limits on what the federal government can do when the next serious recession hits. Look at U.S. growth now with the federal government running 1 trillion dollars per year in deficits and household debt hitting new highs.

      All of this is out-of-sight and out-of-mind for the Stock Jocks who have short memories which, as I recently said, has served them well compared to obsessing about every piece of actual or potential negative economic news. There are always negative news items.

      One major problem with the data is that it is aggregate. What is the increase in household wealth at the median and for quintile of income?

      It is like the debt service payments to disposable income ratio. It never looked bad before the 2008 since it was aggregate data that millions with no debt (about 1/3rd of households own their homes free and clear). If you excluded the debt free households, and had data only on those that had mortgage and other debt, the problem would have been obvious. Household debt to disposable income peaked around 130% before the Near Depression, but the number may have been over 200% for the indebted class. Just don't have the most important numbers and have to guess.

      Net Worth numbers have gone up in the aggregate but that is primarily a recovery in home values and tremendous gains in stocks where the distribution is highly uneven among the population. I doubt that the median net worth of or the average net worth of the median income household has increased anywhere near the numbers shown in the net worth chart, compared to where they were in 2007.

      Delete
  2. Thank you. That's all very interesting. A little depressing but interesting. From the inversion to household debt to 2nd quarter GOP making more of an splash.

    I thought the other inversions didn't count and tended to sometimes happen and work their way out. Is that so?

    There was an article that explained what they indicate which is different from the 2-10 which is used. I think the 2-10 was used for business loans or something. That's all vague. I'd have to go find the article, and I don't have items saved well the way you do.

    You're saying the tax cuts did their "magic" and it's coming to it's end? That matches events and makes sense.

    I agree on what dem control will do with taxes. With lower middle class taxes is that likely to improve the economy?

    In my mind the big economic problem is similar to turn of the century's industrial age. Every industry is benefiting from but getting squeezed by the electronic/information age.

    Agree too that dems need to not go far left and the coasts don't understand that. I'm from the coast but a country bumpkin. My area of origin is very similar to the rust belt in demographics & economics. (Including the rust & 4-wheel drive subarus.)

    We haven't had euphoria. so it seems unlikely a big recession, crash is coming. Or will this time be different? Or does the euphoria over Trump economy count as euphoria?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: As to the corporate tax cuts, the Y-O-Y growth in net income caused by the tax cuts favorably impacted the comparison of 2018 over 2017. The 2018 already incorporate that benefit which result in net income increases.

      When you look at earnings, focus on how much organic revenues, free cash flow and net income are growing. The E.P.S. number can be manipulated in a variety of ways including massive share buybacks.

      Regarding the yield curve inversion issue, investor and guru focus has been on the two/ten year treasury spread in the past, which has not yet inverted, but has come to inverting and is close now.

      My point is that the flat yield curve and multiple yield inversions along the 1 to 7 year maturity spectrum do constitute a yellow light about a relatively near future economic slowdown. The fact that the 2/10 spread has missed inverting by a few basis points so far does not cause that light to green.

      Whatever improves the disposable income of the middle class after debt service payments is far better than borrowing the money spent, when looking at the long term health of the U.S. economy.

      It is the bottom 4 quintiles that drive the U.S. economy. Rich people spend substantially less of their disposable income and are consequently far less important as drivers of a consumer led economy. Yet the tax cuts will primarily benefit them directly, or indirectly through their ownership of publicly traded stocks where the company is using the tax savings to buyback stock and increase the dividend.

      Delete
    2. That explained a lot.

      I knew that the reason for lack of tax cut mattering is that while companies continue to get the cut, it's a year over year. Somehow that faded out of mind completely. So much appreciated to have your explanation to tack it back in place.

      I tend to not yet understand EPS as manipulated or even directly figured with all the line items with line-titles I have to look up.

      This seems like great advice that I am logging for myself ""When you look at earnings, focus on how much organic revenues, free cash flow and net income are growing. ""

      FG's data this week on earnings estimates put's it as much lower growth than we've been seeing. Normally EPS beats estimates. But even with that... it's lining up with your comments over the last few months of expecting less.

      Your comments on inversion got my attention too. I don't have a sense of how wide the spread is historically. It's currently running .17 to .40 ish. Is being that close, something that can undo and become a wider safer spread again?

      I have been focused on the lack of 2-10 inversion. The idea that closeness of the others is a flag... hadn't really sunk in.

      Hopefully and it sounds like, the dems will focus on lower quintile's disposable or even core income.

      I'm still baffled by the lack of exuberance. Maybe there will be one more round of that before the recession enters.

      Much appreciate your writings and explanations!!




      Delete
    3. Land: This is a link to a historical chart for the 2-10 year:

      Move the left cursor all the way to the left to pick up data back to 1976:

      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y

      The inversions occur before every recession but the decree and time period for the inversions are small since 1982. The inversions were deeper and longer before the 1980 and 1982 recessions.

      Delete
    4. So inversion has become less of a clear indicator. Probably because FEDs stepping in more and with more attention to not inverting in spite of their lack of success.

      Which would lead to the though that if Fed reduces rates... and times themselves well, there may be a slowdown recession this time, without a clear inversion. Maybe just similar to the ones we've seen. Have I got that logic right?

      Thanks for the chart!!!

      Delete
    5. Ugh. That's a very ugly chart. It's like rates ratios are taking a long slow by definitive nose dive.

      It's not below yet. And that's mattered in the past. Until then there's been a long period before the recession hit.

      The dive matches while stocks were on a rally tear. Quite a contrast.

      Delete
    6. Land: Given the extraordinary monetary policies of the FED and other central banks which can impact the U.S. yield curve, there is some reasonable doubt that the market would be signaling a recession when the 2 year treasury has a higher yield than the 10 year.

      In other words, the yield curve now is less of a creation of market forces than of extraordinary FED and other central banks monetary policies that have manipulated rates so much that they are no longer pure market signals or close to it.

      Still, a 2-10 year U.S. yield inversion has occurred before a recession every time over the past six decades or so.

      I would not place too much emphasis on the 2-10 year barely failing to invert when the yield curve is this flat with multiple inversions along the 1 month to 7 year maturity range.

      I would just call the existing yield curve as a warning signal that economic growth may be far slower than currently expected by the Stock Jocks with a recession within 12 to 18 months being a significantly greater possibility than currently anticipated by existing stock prices.

      The yield compression in the U.S. and other developed countries forces more investors to seek out a real total return from riskier paper assets (mostly stocks), which in turn drives up their prices to levels that would not otherwise exist in a more normal yield environment. The mere fear of a recession caused a fast 20% decline in the SPX. What will happen when the real thing is unquestionably in progress given the current worldwide debt levels?

      Delete
  3. In a recent comment somewhere, I gave an incorrect link to an article discussing the cuts to analyst forecasts for SPX earnings this year. This is the correct citation:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-what-to-expect-as-sp-500-earnings-growth-estimate-gets-cut-in-half-2019-01-14

    Note the analyst estimate that over 50% of the 2018 4th quarter SPX E.P.S. earnings growth comes from the corporate tax cuts. And, importantly, the estimates involve E.P.S. rather than net income and are non-GAAP E.P.S. numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the article, I'll read it tomorrow. If growth comes from the cuts, that's fine... unless new gov't changes reduce that.

      So by being non-gaap the growth source, can be less clear and less about business growth... than with gaap earnings? I assume that's what that means.

      I've started concluding a plan for my portfolio. I'll write it at a later blog as it solidifies, rather than extending on this one.

      Onto the next blog!

      Delete
  4. As of 2/18/19 , the quarterly 2019 GAAP and Non-GAAP E.P.S. estimates for SPX were overly optimistic even after the first half estimates have been cut in recent weeks. I will discuss those estimates in my next post. Once again, the optimism is backloaded into the last 3 quarters since the first quarter is not looking so hot.

    I noticed today that Power Financial will be making a large tender offer for its shares.

    https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/power-corporation-announces-intention-to-repurchase-up-to-1-35-billion-of-its-subordinate-voting-shares-through-a-substantial-issuer-bid-877092453.html

    I own 100 shares bought on the Toronto exchange using my existing CAD stash.

    Item # 5.A. Averaged Down: Bought 50 PWF:CA at C$25.5 (C$1 IB commission):
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/01/observations-and-sample-of-recent_23.html

    Item # 5.A. Bought 50 PWF:CA at C$27.73
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/12/observations-and-sample-of-recent_23.html

    Power Financial Corp.
    C$29.65 +C$0.32 +1.09%

    With the market's accelerating downdraft, the share price has come down from its intraday high of C$30.03.

    The shares also trade on the U.S. pink sheet exchange:

    Power Financial Corp.
    U S $22.41 +US$0.4235 +1.93%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pofnf

    I also own 100 shares of the USD priced Power Corporation which is also mentioned in the press release. I am slightly in the red on that position (symbols for ordinary shares POW:CA and PWCDF). I have bought and sold that one, either the ordinary shares price in CADs or those priced in USDs, several times.

    Power Corp. of Canada (USD priced shares)
    U.S.$21.70 +$0.5063 +2.39%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pwcdf

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/03/observations-and-sample-of-recent_6.html

    ReplyDelete