Saturday, July 13, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: FIE:CA, HTA, PFF, TPVG

Economy

Core CPI rose .3% in June, the largest monthly increase since January 2018. Core CPI rose 2.1% Y-O-Y through June, up from 2% Y-O-Y in May. All items CPI rose .1%, dragged down by energy prices which have been trending up so far this month. All items CPI rose 1.6% Y-O-Y through June, held back by over a 5% Y-O-Y decline in energy prices.  




Consumer Price Index Summary


China and U.S. Differ Over Agricultural Purchases Trump Boasted About - The New York Times  On 6/29/19, Donald claimed that China  is going to be buying a tremendous amount of food and agricultural product, and they’re going to start that very soon, almost immediately.” China denies making an explicit commitment and has not yet started to ramp up purchases. "Chinese officials have maintained that any further purchases would be made only as part of a trade deal rather than as a unilateral concession."



CBO estimates effects of House Democrats $15 minimum wage plan  (While millions would be better off with a minimum wage increase to $15 per  hour, the CBO estimates that over 1M will lose their jobs. Those in favor of a political action will frequently downplay or ignore the negative consequences).  

Morgan Stanley sees Fed cutting by half percentage point at July meeting 


+++++

Markets and Market Commentary

The SPX triple top never formed since the next major move after re-entering the 2945-2955 resistance range was up. As I noted earlier, the failure to form a triple top does not provide any concrete guidance on how high the stock market will go before running into a new resistance level. 


It is my opinion that the Stock Jocks are over estimating the FED's power to generate growth and underestimating the potential decline in stock prices when a recession occurs, probably worldwide, with U.S. stock prices at elevated levels.  

Why does the economy need monetary stimulus when interest rates are already abnormally low by any historical standard, the massive tax cuts went into effect just over a year ago, and the federal government is spending $1 trillion or so per year more than it takes in revenue? Does a .25% or .5% cut in the federal funds rate even address the causes of the current worldwide economic slowdown?

I am not comforted by the recent stock surge. I find it as a bit scary and irrational. 

I am more certain that longer term bond prices and yields are even more undesirable than stocks. U.S. treasury bill yields will soon fall below the inflation rate and are already near the 2.1% Y-O-Y core inflation rate: 


The treasury bill yields are below the sticky inflation rate which was 2.5% Y-O-Y through June.  Sticky-Price CPI - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta The median CPI Y-O-Y rate was 2.8% through June. Median CPI: Latest Data

Fastenal just gave us a glimpse into this earnings season as it tanks on tariff costsFastenal Company Reports 2019 Second Quarter Earnings ("While we successfully raised prices as one element of our strategy to offset tariffs placed to date on products sourced from China, those increases were not sufficient to also counter general inflation in the marketplace. We have taken additional actions in the third quarter of 2019 to counter the broader pressures we are experiencing on our costs as well as the additional tariffs that were levied on China-sourced products in May 2019.")

Blackstone strategist: Market is too dovish on Fed, correction coming: NBC The argument is that the FED will probably make a .25% cut this month as "insurance", but further cuts will not happen which will cause the Stock Jocks to throw a hissy fit. 


Yield gap between risky corporate debt and investment grade sinks to 12-year low - MarketWatch I have been staying away from junk rated bonds, viewing their yields compared to investment grade rated bonds to be inadequate compensation for their additional credit risks.  

France passes digital tax on US tech firms despite trade threat (3% tax on French revenues)


Singapore GDP down 3.4% for the second quarter compared to the 1st The consensus forecast was for +.1%. 


30-year Treasury yield hits nearly six-week high after ‘borderline shocking’ debt auction - MarketWatch


The cure for abnormally low rates may be higher than expected inflation numbers which force central bankers to raise short term rates or a buyers' strike. There may come a time when investors worldwide refuse to buy negative nominal yield bonds or negative real yield bonds that have nominal positive rates. 


++++

TPVG | TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. Overview 
Closing Price Last Friday: TPVG $14.48 -$0.03 -0.21% 

Website: TriplePoint Venture Growth
TPVG SEC Filings
2018 Annual Report

Based on TPVG's history to date, I view this BDC as one of the best externally managed ones. 

The stock may enjoy a bump on Monday based on Scott Black recommending it in this week's Barron's. Small-Cap Stock Picks for an Expensive Market, According to Delphi Management’s Scott Black - Barron's He is forecasting net investment income at $1.67 per share this year, which is about 10 cents higher than the consensus estimate.  

When Black was interviewed for the article, TPVG was selling at $14.23. He claimed that this price was  "right around its net asset value per share." I would not have phrased that claim in the same way. The last reported net asset value per share was $13.59 as of 3/31/19: 10-Q at page 3  I do not view a $14.23 price as being "right around its net asset value per share".  

Last Friday's closing price of $14.48 represented a 6.55% premium to net asset asset value as of 3/31/19. 

I have pared my position but still own over 100 shares. 

The largest of two positions is in my Schwab account: 


I took the last quarterly dividend in cash since I viewed the likely reinvestment price as being outside of my fair value range. 

2 Year History Schwab Account: 




If the shares pop enough next week, I will probably sell that position and keep the smaller position in my Fidelity account where purchases are subject to the small ball restriction. 

Sell DiscussionsItem # 4.C. Eliminated  TPVG in Roth IRA Account (4/17/19 Post)Item # 3.B.(4/14/19 Post)Item 3.A. Sold 40 TPVG at $13.44-Schwab Account and Item #3B Sold 50 TPVG at $13.39 Vanguard Roth  IRA (3/13/19 Post)Item 2.B. Sold 50 TPVG at $13.39 (3/4/2017 Post)Item # 3 Sold 50 TPVG at $12.33 (1/16/17 Post)

Buy DiscussionsItem # 4.A.  Bought 50 TPVG at $12.11-In A Roth IRA Account (12/5/18 Post)Item # 3 D. Bought 10 TPVG at $11.2-Used Commission Free Trade (1/9/19 Post)Item # 4.A.  Bought 50 TPVG at $12.11-In A Roth IRA Account (12/5/18 Post)Item # 3.A. Added 50 TPVG at $13.28 and 10 at $13.02-Used Schwab Commission Free Trades (8/15/18 Post)Item # 2.B. Added 10 TPVG at $11.6-Used Commission Free Trade (3/19/18 Post)Items 1.B. and 1.C. Bought 50 TPVG at $12.32 and 10 at $12.01-Used Commission Free Trades (2/26/18 Post)Comment Blog # 3-South Gent: Bought 50 TPVG at $10.61 | Seeking Alpha

TPVG Trading Profits to Date: $406.71

++++


Trump on 'Unfair' U.S.-Japan Security Treaty - FactCheck.org Just another example of Clueless Don proving his own boundless ignorance. 


No Evidence Kim Jong Un Rebuffed Obama's 'Begging' - FactCheck.org Just another Donald reality creation. 

Trump Posts Fake Ronald Reagan Quote Predicting a Trump Presidency Trump's representation was rated Pants on Fire by PolitiFact.

Trump calls the people planning to boycott Home Depot ‘vicious and totally crazed’ - MarketWatch Donald routinely describes himself when attacking others. Donald is one vicious and crazy person. Donald Trump slams 'Radical Left' over Home Depot boycott threats - The Washington Post Trump frequently requests his True Believers to boycott products made by companies who have offended his sensibilities. For example, Don the Hypocrite called for a boycott of Macy's. Donald Trump calls for a Macy’s boycott - The Washington Post


+++


Donald the Environmental Champion:


After recent polling showed more Americans becoming concerned about environmental issues and global warming, Donald delivered one of his Alternate Reality speeches.


Flanked by former lobbyists for the coal and oil industries, who he appointed to senior EPA positions, Donald claimed to be leading the U.S. charge for a cleaner environment. 


One environmental expert called Donald's remarks a true "1984 moment". Trump Saw Opportunity in Speech on Environment. Critics Saw a ‘“1984” Moment.’ - The New York Times 


It is impossible to keep track of those moments since Donald became President but I suspect the number would easily exceed 10,000. 


Donald claimed he wanted cleaner water as his administration was rolling back clear water and stream regulations. 


Donald took credit for the decline in CO2 levels that occurred during prior administrations, while neglecting to mention that his policies would result in more CO2 emissions from coal plants. 


Demagogue Don did not even mention climate change and global warming for the obvious reason that he is without question the Climate-Change-Denier-In-Chief. Bush's EPA Chief Slams Trump's Environment Speech: 'He's Living In His Own Reality' 


It is important to understand that tens of millions actually believe Donald when he is making obviously false statements that are demonstrably contradicted by facts. 
 


Donald and the Census Citizenship Question


Donald caved on adding a citizenship question to the census form Trump abandons effort to include citizenship question on census - CBS News Trump admitted that citizenship information could be gathered from other government sources which was always the case. The reasons for adding the question to the census were to throw red meat to the Trumpsters and to disadvantage the blue states politically. 


The short form, which has been in use since 1970, has never had a citizenship question. 


The long form, which was sent to about 1/6 of  households contained a citizenship question for the 1970 through 2000 censuses.Questionnaires - History - U.S. Census Bureau


The Census Bureau now collects citizenship information in its annual American Community Survey which is sent to about 3.5 million households. American Community Survey (ACS) The 2018 ACS is scheduled for release next September. Schedule for Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Statistics and ACS  


Prior to Donald's effort to add a citizenship question to the short form, the government had never requested citizenship status for every person in a household. FACT CHECK: Has Citizenship Been A Standard Census Question? : NPRCitizenship questions on the census have no historical pedigree - Los Angeles Times There were previously questions about where each individual was born. 


Prior to the 1850 census, only the head of household would be identified by name which makes genealogical research more difficult.    


In the 1980 census, there was a question about whether household members were naturalized which hopelessly confused a large segment of the population. 22% of native born Americans claimed to be naturalized. The Long History of the U.S. Government Asking Americans Whether They Are Citizens - The New York Times 


The Constitution directs that an "enumeration" of persons living in the U.S. be conducted every 10 years. That provision, contained in Article 1, requires that persons rather than just citizens be counted in each census. Census in the Constitution  


Claims That Obama ‘Yanked’ Citizenship Question From Census Are False - The New York Times


++++++++

1. Added 100 FIE:CA at C$6.84 (C$1 IB Commission):





Current Position: 500 shares.


Maximum Position: 1000 shares


Quote: iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF

Sponsor's Website: iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF

Closing Price Last Friday: FIE.TO C$6.95 -C$0.02 -0.22% 


Last DiscussedItem # 2. Bought 100 FIE:CA at C$6.92(4/7/19 Post)


Dividends: Monthly at C$.04 per share


Last Ex Dividend Date: 6/19/19


Dividend Yield at C$6.84 = 7.02%


Dividend Reinvestment: No


Last Sell DiscussionsItem # 5. Sold 300 FIE:CA at C$7.64 (11/26/17 Post)Item # 4.A. Sold 100 FIE:CA at C$7.57 (10/30/17 Post)


A price over C$7.5 would likely trigger an elimination.


Top 10 Holdings:




The top holding has been in a bear market since January 2018. Chart: Ishares Canadian Preferred Stock Index ETF (CPD:CA) Using a one year chart, the shares have pierced to the upside the 50 and 100 day SMA lines but the current price is still well below its 200 SMA line. 


I have been buying some Canadian reset equity preferred stocks since their dividend yields are more attractive due to share price declines than similarly rated U.S. equity preferred stocks. Most U.S. equity preferred stocks are selling above their $25 par values, whereas the Canadian reset equity preferred stocks are selling at significant discounts to their C$25 par values. I am for the most part buying back Canadian resets that were sold at higher prices.   


That ETF owns both fixed coupon and reset equity preferred stocks. The Canadian reset preferred stocks suffered a sea change in investor sentiment based on five year resets occurring at lower coupons than previously anticipated by investors, even though several of them reset at higher coupons than the ones prevailing during their respective fixed coupon periods.  


Canada 5 Year Government Bond Advanced Charts 

2. Intermediate Term Bond Ladder Basket Strategy

A. Sold 2 Public Storage 2.37% SU Maturing on 9/15/22-A Roth IRA Account



FINRA Page: Bond Detail


Sold at 99.950
YTM at 99.950 = 2.386%

I am replacing these lower yielding intermediate term bonds with higher yielding securities that carry greater risks.  

3. Small Ball ETF Buy "Programs":

A. Restarted PFF-Bought 10 at $36.85 (Commission free for Fidelity Customers):




Quote: PFF | iShares Preferred & Income Securities ETF Overview


Closing Price Last Friday: PFF $37.00 +$0.09 +0.24% 


Sponsor's Website: iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | PFF


The so called "preferred stock" ETFs will own equity preferred stocks and exchange traded bonds. Only the equity preferred stocks that are issued by non-pass through entities pay qualified dividends.  


Expense Ratio: .45% (view as high)


Dividend: Monthly at a variable rate


Last Ex Dividend:  7/2 (after purchase)



Number of Holdings as of 6/28/19: 466

Last EliminationItem # 5 Sold 75 PFF at $39.45-Commission Free at Fidelity-Update For Exchange Traded Bond And Preferred Stock Basket Strategy As Of 5/26/2016 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha (net profit = $38.43) Of those 75 shares, I sold a 25 share lot at -$2.54  loss that was bought at $39.55. Increasing Cash Flow In A World Without Risk Free Yield-Bought 25 Shares of The ETF PFF at $39.55- South Gent | Seeking Alpha (1/15/15 Post)

Last Purchase DiscussionItem # 1 Update On Bond And Equity Preferred Stock Basket Strategy As Of 8/14/15 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


Current Position: 10 shares


Maximum Position: 100 shares


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule


Dividend Reinvestment: No, until I reach 50 shares


I do not regard this security as a suitable long term buy and hold given its five year total return history. Morningstar: IShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) Total Returns The five year annual average total return through last Thursday (7/11) was 4.29%, which is lower than the dividend yield throughout that period. I always regard that result as a major negative. 


Morningstar currently has a 2 star rating. 


I view this ETF and a similar one that can be bought at Schwab commission free (PGX) which I have traded as well, as alternatives to low yielding sweep account rates. The objective is simply to earn a return in excess of the dividend yield over a relatively short period of time. 


4. Bought 50 HTA at $26.88-Used Commission Free Trade:



The ex dividend date occurred on the day after this purchase. 

Closing Price Last Friday: HTA $27.85 -$0.05 -0.18% 


While I normally do not buy a tax event, HTA's price had declined by more than the value of the dividend when I purchased this lot on Monday 7/1. 


The closing price on the previous Friday was $27.43. Moreover, the stock price had closed at $29.15 on 6/20/19. 


When those percentage declines occur just prior to an ex dividend date, I do not view the purchase as buying a tax event.


Quote: Healthcare Trust of America Inc. (HTA)


MOB = Medical Office Building


"Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. (NYSE: HTA) is the largest dedicated owner and operator of MOBs in the United States, comprising approximately 23.2 million square feet of GLA, with $6.8 billion invested primarily in MOBs." 


Website: HTA – Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.


Key Markets HTA – Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.


Healthcare Trust of America Inc. Interactive Chart


Dividend: Quarterly at $.31 per share ($1.24 annually)


Last Ex Dividend Date: 7/2/19 (after purchase)


Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. (HTA) Dividend Date & History 


Dividend Yield at $26.88 = 4.61%


Last Earnings ReportHealthcare Trust of America, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2019 Earnings




The knock that I have is the decline Y-O-Y in the FFO numbers and in funds available for distribution ("FAD")


Normalized FAD per share for the Q/E 3/31/19 was $.35 per share, so there is some room for dividend growth (divide $73.153M in FAD by 208.999M average weighed diluted shares)  


I would likely sell the position at over $30 per share preferably after collecting 4 quarterly dividends. 


Bond Ownership: I also own 8 HTA $1K par value bonds:


2 HTA 3.375% SU Maturing on 7/15/21

4 HTA 2.95% SU Maturing on 7/1/22
2 HTA 3.5% SU Maturing on 8/1/26

When I am in a profit taking mode for bonds, focusing on intermediate term ones, the most likely HTA bond to be sold would be the 2026 one. I see no reason to harvest profits in the 2021 and 2022 maturities.


The following is a snapshot of HTA's outstanding bonds:



Prices as of the Close on 6/28/19
There are two listings for the same 3.7% SU maturing on 4/15/23. 

When you see that at FINRA, it simply means that the bond was initially sold as a private placement to qualified institutional investors. Thereafter, an SEC prospectus was filed and the privately issued bonds were exchanged for identical ones with a different CUSIP that could then be publicly traded without restrictions on who could buy them.


Due to the recent price appreciation in the bonds, the common stock increased its yield advantage compared to the "safer" senior unsecured bonds.   


Prior Trades: I have only nibbled at this "blue chip" MOB REIT due to its low dividend yield and lackluster dividend growth. 


With the ten year treasury hovering near 2%, I have become more sanguine about accepting a 4% to 5% dividend yield from a quality REIT.  


Item # 1.A. Sold 15 HTA at $28.57-Used Commission Free Trade(9/12/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $46.12); Item # 2 Sold 50 HTA at $26.25 Update For REIT Basket Strategy As Of 10/28/15 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha (profit snapshot = $124.1)-Item # 5 Bought 50 HTA at $23.45 Update For REIT Basket Strategy As Of 9/8/15 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

6 comments:

  1. South Gent,

    TPVG is a rare breed among so many disappointing BDC's. BDC is not a "buy and hold" category and diversification among BDC's doesn't work either. One has to monitor their BDC holdings closely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: It is practically impossible for an individual investor to know beforehand whether a particular BDC loan will go bad. The loans are mostly to private companies that do not publicly file their financials.

      Earnings calls will frequently mention loans that are in non-accrual and the historical marks for those loans can be found in the BDC's 10-Q and 10-K SEC forms. Even when the non-accrual is disclosed, it is not practical for individual investors to independently assess the valuation made by the BDC until the valuation becomes so low that it no longer matters.

      I discussed earlier the valuation marks for Hollander Sleep Products that filed for bankruptcy. A significant part of the loans may end up being converted into equity. PPLT and PNNT still had the marks near cost as of 3/31/19. That is suspect. Is it wrong? I doubt that any individual investor could make a case that is either wrong or right, but only that is suspect.

      It is also suspect on management's integrity when a mark is near fair value and within a few quarters the valuation is lowered to zero. I mention in my posts several of those examples. That is a material piece of information when deciding to make an investment. Can you trust the valuation marks?

      There have been a few BDCs where buy and hold would have worked over the past 5 years but the past may not be prologue. Ares Capital (ARCC) has an average annual total return of 11.16%:

      https://www.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/

      That is at least close to the dividend yield through that period. The internally managed MAIN had a 14.27% annual return over the same period.

      My goal is simply to earn a total return in excess of the dividend yield. For the better BDCs like ARCC, MAIN and TPVG, it is easier to accomplish that objective since the managers are not persistently incinerating capital through bad loans. BDCs will make bad loans as do banks. The relevant question is how much and how often. A bevy of bad loans over a long period indicate bad underwriting standards and/or bad judgment.

      When I classify one as deservedly hated, I will generally find it far more difficult to exit at a profit. Those would include FSK, CMFN, and TCRD. I recently successfully exited position in CPTA and ABDC which I will discuss in a subsequent post. The 5 year total annual average returns for CMFN and TCRD are -.07% and -2.54%. That is not a promising sign for the future.

      Other ways to spot a problematic management are to look at historical net asset value per shares (stable or destructive) and dividend cuts.

      Delete
  2. First Horizon National Corp. (FHN)
    $15.59 +$ 0.785 +5.30%
    Last Updated: Jul 16, 2019 10:25 a.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fhn

    I have substantially pared my regional bank basket based primarily on concerns about net interest margin compression and secondarily on concerns about the favorable credit cycle coming to an end. Charge-offs are near historic lows and most regionals that I follow are near their historic lows in non-performing loans to total loan and non-performing assets to total asset ratios.

    Over the short term, however, net interest margins will be receiving a boost from the rapid decline in short term rates which will lower deposit costs. For those of us who buy CDs and treasury bills, this is not news.

    More gains from longer term debt securities in their investment portfolios are likely as well.

    I have a relatively new small ball position in FHN (46+ shares with an average cost per share of $14.67 and the lowest cost lot bought at $12.62 on 12/25/18)

    The Stock Jocks are responding favorably to the FHN earnings report released this morning. The Non-GAAP E.P.S. was reported at $.42 vs.the $.37 consensus estimate.

    https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/07/16/1883176/0/en/First-Horizon-Reports-Second-Quarter-Results-and-Highlights.html

    NIM ticked up to 3.34% from 3.31% in the prior quarter. The rollover of higher yielding CDs will pick up in the last two quarters and into next year.

    Net-Charge off ratio was at .07%.

    There is frequently a good faith debate on whether to use the GAAP or non-GAAP E.P.S. or whether to accept all expense items subtracted from GAAP to arrive at Non-GAAP E.P.S. Sometimes the difference is trivial but that is not the case with FHN's second quarter. GAAP E.P.S. was reported at .$.35.

    The expenses excluded from GAAP include the following: "$18.7 million of pre-tax restructuring-related expenses associated with efficiency initiatives, $9.1 million of pre-tax rebranding expenses, $8.6 million of pre-tax acquisition-related expenses primarily associated with the Capital Bank Financial Corp. (“CBF”) acquisition, and an $8.3 million pre-tax expense reversal related to the settlement of litigation matters; 1Q19 includes $12.2 million of pre-tax restructuring-related expenses and $5.7 million of pre-tax acquisition-related expenses, all of which impact certain performance measures"

    I would not exclude cash expenses related to efficiency initiatives and restructuring since those are frequently recurring expenditures that are an integral part of operations. I am willing to exclude cash expenses related to FHN's acquisition since the company is not routinely engaged in them and consequently that expenditure is more in the nature of a one off expense (though spread over several quarters).

    Earlier I discussed that it was proper IMO to ignore the one time non-cash charge relating to the reevaluation of deferred tax assets which are used to reduce subsequent tax liabilities. Those assets became less valuable when the corporate tax rate was slashed. The main consideration is not the non-cash revaluation but the lowering of future tax liabilities due to the top corporate tax rate being reduced to 21% from 35%.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder what u thought of the new IRA rules that tax the inherited traditional IRA over a ten year withdrawal timeframe for children after death of the 2nd spouse; it seems like a tax grab for all those who saved and put money in an IRA for eventual use by children. An end to the "Stretch IRA"

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-on-track-to-pass-bill-making-big-changes-to-u-s-retirement-system-11558625474?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. G: You are referring to what is called the SECURE Act.

      https://www.marketwatch.com/story/beware-the-irs-is-eyeing-your-inherited-money-2019-07-15?mod=mw_theo_homepage

      The current rule is that a child could gradually drain the inherited IRA account over their lifespan.

      I am not in favor of that kind of change but neither was I supportive of the change that is now taxing 80% of my Social Security payments as income, a process that started in the 1980s.

      I would view the proposed change in inherited IRA withdrawals for non-spouses to be far outweighed in importance by the increased exemptions from the estate tax.

      Most households can now avoid the federal estate tax which was the not the case a decade or so ago when the exemption was $600K as I recall which could be doubled with a spousal bypass trust.

      One way to increase the amount that children will inherit is to increase after tax income before the parents die by moving to a low tax state in retirement. I can't even imagine paying a state income tax on my SS benefits but retirees in several states have to pay taxes on retirement plan distributions , SS payments and pensions. The property tax on my home has been stable at around $2,200 per year after going down to around $1800 from $2,200 for about 5 years. There is no state income tax in Tennessee on earned income, no gift or estate tax and the small tax on some dividend and interest payments will be gone after 2020.

      https://smartasset.com/estate-planning/tennessee-estate-tax

      Delete
  4. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/07/observations-and-sample-of-recent_17.html

    ReplyDelete