Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: DEA, DES, FHB, GOOD, NVS, VRP

Economy


China’s entrance into WTO cost U.S. 3.4 million jobs, new study finds - MarketWatch That estimate covered the 2001-2017 period. 74% of the jobs were lost in manufacturing according to this study prepared by the Economic Policy Institute. The China toll deepens: Growth in the bilateral trade deficit between 2001 and 2017 cost 3.4 million U.S. jobs, with losses in every state and congressional district | Economic Policy Institute

The Economic Policy Institute is generally viewed as a liberal think tank. 


This kind of study will make it even more likely that there will be an all out trade war with China as the U.S. hardens its position. 


The problem with this kind of study is that it is impossible to account for all of the variables. For example, lower input costs for American companies makes them more competitive in both the domestic and foreign markets. Erecting trade barriers increases their costs, makes them less competitive and would result in job losses. 


Overall, however, I would not quarrel with the 3.4M job loss as being a decent ballpark type number.  


Dollar yuan: China currency will weaken in next 6 months, says Goldman

Tariffs will cost Harley-Davidson more than $40 million in 2018  


IRobot stock plunges despite earnings beat, tariffs to hurt margins - MarketWatch


+++++

Markets and Market Commentary

Tariffs begin to take bite out of U.S. corporate earnings growth | Reuters


The market did make a nice comeback yesterday from the intra-day lows but faded into the close. 


S & P 500  2,740.69 -15.19 -0.55% 

Day Range: 2,691.43 - 2,753.59

Investors are still buying the dips but are being met with wave after wave of selling. Nothing has been resolved about who will win this tug of war. So far this month, the bears are more in control though the Stock Jocks are putting up a spirited defense. 


There was a slight flight to safety move yesterday: 


IEF $100.39 +$0.26 +0.26% : iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF 

TLT $113.92 +$0.36 +0.32%: iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 
GLD $116.39 +$0.68 +0.59%: SPDR Gold Trust 
FXF $93.85 +$0.10 +0.11% : Invesco CurrencyShares Swiss Franc 

Caterpillar and MMM were weak yesterday after reporting third quarter earnings. 


MMM $192.55 -$8.81 -4.38%: 3M Company 

CAT $118.98 -$9.73 -7.56% : Caterpillar, Inc. 

Both CAT and MMM are DJIA components.  


3M Slides After Cutting Profit Forecast Again on Sales Slump - Bloomberg
3M Reports Third-Quarter 2018 Results (sales down .2% Y-O-Y); 
MMM Chart 


UPDATE 1-Texas Instruments forecasts lower-than-expected profit, shares fallTXN Chart 

Crude oil is tanking. As previously noted, I stated that SA is pumping more oil to bring down U.S. gas prices before the election since that nation views the republicans as far more hospitable and accommodating than the democrats. That was confirmed today: Oil Tumbles 4% as Saudis Pledge to Produce as Much as They Can - BloombergOil prices plunge more than 4 percent as stock market tumbles 


Analyst who predicted the 2008 crash warns of bubble brewing in U.S. household wealth - MarketWatch



Italy's bond were downgraded by Moody's to one notch above junk. Moody's cuts Italy's credit rating one notch; stable outlook - MarketWatch

European Commission rejects Italy's 2019 budget plan - MarketWatch


Kudlow says stocks are falling on fear Democrats will win midterms This argument is pure garbage which is what I would expect from Larry Kudlow. The Democrats will not have the votes to change anything that the republicans have done, nor will they have any power to alter Trump's deregulation path being pursued in the administrative agencies.  


Wells Fargo's Mike Mayo upgrades Morgan Stanley


I have been pointing out that there is considerable weakness in the stock market lurking underneath the surface. The following article was published today: Under the surface, this stock market is slowly ‘rotting away’ - MarketWatch The percentage of S & P 500 components trading above their 200 day SMA lines is currently at 40.7%S&P 500 Index Chart, Components, Prices - Barchart.com 

The S & P 500 closed yesterday below its 50, 100 and 200 day SMA lines using a one year chart at YF. S&P 500 Chart-Yahoo Finance

++++

Trump:

While Trump has maintained about a 90% approval rating from republicans since becoming President, his overall approval has trended in the 38% to 42% until recently. The most recent NBC poll has his approval rating at 47%: Trump approval jumps ahead of Obama’s 2010 midterm approval rating


Donald is IMO the most successful and effective demagogue in American political history. He has proven beyond any doubt that lying and appealing to peoples' worst instincts is the road to political power in today's America:  
Trump's mid-term campaign of fear - CNN 


One of his most
recent lies is a promise that there will be a middle class tax cut before the election. Congress is not even in session and will not be until after the election. Trump's mystery tax cut puzzles Washington - POLITICO


Ted Cruz once called Donald a pathological liar, Donald Trump is a 'pathological liar'. (1:14 into the video, "lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth") That is of course a true statement. Now, Cruz and Donald are best buddies.  


++ 


Trump wants to trash the nuclear arms treaty with Russia that was negotiated by Reagan. Russia fires back at Trump's plan to pull U.S. out of nuclear arms treaty - CBS News; GOP lawmakers criticize Trump’s decision to withdraw from nuclear arms treaty - The Washington Post  


It is clear that the Chaos Monkey views any international agreement, which was not negotiated by him, as the worst deal ever negotiated in the universe's history. 


I am not sure how all of them can be the worst deal ever negotiated, but anything is possible in the Alternate Reality Universe inhabited by the Duck and his followers. True is false and false is true. 


++


Trump is corrupt, a fact that is regularly confirmed by good reporting or what Donald and the Trumpsters call "Fake News". 


Corruption takes many forms. 

For Donald, the most significant form of corruption is using false claims to manipulate voters on a scale previously unknown in American political history.  



Trump's Washington Hotel and the FBI Building:  

Then there is corruption relating to financial matters. 

The latest example of Trump's corruption involves his decision to nix a plan to swap the existing FBI building which is falling about with a developer who would build a new FBI in suburban Maryland or Virginia. 


Donald's problem with that plan was that the developer was going to tear down the old FBI building and build a mixed-use project that would have included a hotel across the street from the Donald's hotel. 


This plan was nixed in pursuit of the Duck's personal self-interest and the result will cost taxpayers money. 


In addition, the renovations to the existing FBI building will result in less office space, so that about 2,000 employees will have to be relocated to another facility. 


IG Confirms Trump’s Involvement in FBI Headquarters Project Across From His Hotel


Donald Trump more involved in stopping FBI HQ move than previously known, emails show - CNN


Maryland Rep. Cummings says documents detail Trump involvement in decision to halt FBI headquarters move - Baltimore Sun


Emails show Trump intervened personally to stop FBI headquarters from moving out of DC, Democrats say - Chicago Tribune


Teflon Don instructed all administration employees to avoid answering any questions about his involvement in changing the FBI's plans. The republicans are preventing any investigation by the relevant congressional committees.  


++


Trump Applauds Journalist Assault

Trump praises Montana congressman who assaulted reporter - MarketWatch


Montana Republican Greg Gianforte assaults reporter Ben Jacobs - YouTube (Trump: “Any guy that can do a body slam, he’s my kind of — he’s my guy.”) 


The Trumpsters thought that was a funny line spewed by the Duck and applauded his remark. Ha, ha.


That statement, along with the unprovoked physical assault on a journalist by the incumbent republican congressman in Montana, actually provoked me to give money to the Democrat, Kathleen Williams, who is running against that republican congressman. United States House of Representatives election in Montana, 2018 - BallotpediaMontana Rep. blamed "liberal media" to authorities after reporter assault, police documents show - CBS News 


Donald praise of Greg Gianforte's assault on a journalist for asking a simple question is typical for him and noteworthy given the recent murder of a Washington Post  journalist in Saudi Arabia's consulate. 


Donald Trump's Montana speech: 45 most bizarre lines at Montana Rally- CNN What can you say? Trump is a lying, raving, and invariably incoherent demagogue who appeals to people's worst instincts and has zero redeeming personality characteristics. It is most unfortunate for the nation's future that he is considered to be honest by tens of millions. 


++++


More Republican Conspiracy Theories Formulated to Manipulate the Weak Minded and to Distract from Important Matters for Most Middle Income Families


Donald and other republican politicians like the True Believer Matt Gaetz (R-FL) are claiming that the caravan moving up from Honduras is being financed by the Democrats and George Soros. 


As is normally the case, republicans require no proof to make that assertion which is meant to manipulate the easily manipulated and brain dead since conception. This is how authoritarian minded leaders provide false narratives justifying their power.  


The entire proposition is just ludicrous. No one with an ounce of common sense would view it as remotely credible. 


The Washington Post and New York Times did a fact check and of course found this recent republican conspiracy theory to be baseless. A grainy video from Guatemala sparks Trump conspiracy theory - The Washington PostDid Democrats, or George Soros, Fund Migrant Caravan? Despite Republican Claims, No


It would make sense to claim that Donald or like minded individuals (or the RNC) financed the caravan in order to create a campaign issue that republicans could demagogue so close to the election. There is no proof of that more sensical claim. 


Of course, true conservatives do not make accusations without real factual evidence, just another reason why the modern day GOP is not a conservative party. 

Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz is a terrible personJournalist Debunks Matt Gaetz's and Trump's Paid Migrant Theory 


Trump says 'unknown Middle Easterners are mixed in' migrant caravanTrump Claims ‘Criminals and Unknown Middle Easterners’ Are in Caravan of Migrants



The only reliable evidence that is currently publicly known is that those individuals are fleeing poverty and violence in Honduras, which has become a failed state. Growing caravan of migrants pushes deeper into Mexico - POLITICO The murder rate in that country is among the highest in the world. The crisis in Honduras should matter to the U.S. - The Washington Post  

Counterterrorism official contradicts Trump: No sign ISIS or 'Sunni terrorist groups' are in caravan 


It is important for Donald and his tribe to keep voters focused on this caravan of desparate people which may make it to the border in about 70 or 80 days rather than Mitch McConnell's stated intention to repeal what is left of Obamacare and to cut Medicare and Medicaid. McConnell wants to know why the Democrats can not join with the republicans to increase senior citizen poverty.


The Stable Genius calls the caravan of desperate people walking to the U.S. at about 3 miles per hour a "National Emergency" (actually he spelled emergency as "EMERGY"). For republicans, that is a national emergency of epic proportions, far more important than every other issue including affordable health insurance for American families.  

McConnell: My Biggest Disappointment Is Not Cutting Medicare


Mitch McConnell says it out loud: Republicans are gunning for Social Security, Medicare and Obamacare next


McConnell Bloomberg Interview on Entitlements, Rising Deficits - Bloomberg


++++


Democrats and Border Security


The Democrats are not for open borders, a false claim repeatedly made by Trump, since they have voted for building the existing border walls/fences and increased border security, though some have been opposed to pre-Trump border wall funding.  


U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call on Secure Fence Act of 2006 (passed 80 to 19 with 1 not voting) All of the 19 no votes were Democrats, but a majority of Democrat senators voted yes including Hillary who was a senator representing N.Y. Is Donald Trump right that Hillary Clinton once “wanted a wall” on the Mexican border? | PolitiFact 


In the House, 64 Democrats voted for passage. H.R. 6061 (109th): Secure Fence Act of 2006 -- GovTrack.us 


The Secure Fence Act of 2006 authorized a 700 mile border fence. 


Subsequent to the passage of that act, both political parties had no desire to increase spending 
due to its expense and the additional outlays for border patrol, until Trump was elected and made extending the border wall a priority. That issue became more set in stone due to the fiscal problems occurring during and after the Near Depression.  

As I discussed in a previous post, both political parties have historically been lethargic in dealing with border security until Trump made it a central issue in his Presidency even though illegal border crossings are way down from historical peaks.  


Illegal immigration is down from peaks hit during prior Democrat and Republican administrations. So it is important to keep these numbers in mind when the republicans demagogue this issue: 






BP Southwest Border Sector Apps FY1960 - FY2017.xls





BP Total Monthly Apprehensions FY2000-FY2017.pdf 


The Democrats' political problem is that the GOP has already successfully painted them as weak on border security. That success is partly due to the Democrats emphasizing the plight of the immigrants with border security coming up as an afterthought, if at all, when discussing this issue now. 


And the Democrats have not been effective combating Trump's demagoguery on immigration issues, including his frequent claims that Congress has the power to change the "law" that prevents immediate deportation of  illegal immigrants.    


Congress does not have that power due to a long history of Supreme Court decisions that require that anyone in the U.S. be afforded due process. Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (Sup.Ct. 1982)(and cases cited therein). 


Trump does not try to inform voters of facts and then to rationally discuss the pros and cons of how to effectively deal with problems and issues. He is a demagogue who can not put two sentences together without lying. 


By way of example, suppose an illegal is arrested and charged with a felony? Can the state imprison the accused without a trial by jury? Trump would say that the State should have the right to deprive that person of his liberty without a trial since the illegal immigrant should have no due process rights as a non-person within the meaning of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. Trump amplifies push to end due process for illegal immigrants - POLITICO Trump has no respect for the law or the nation's legal history.  


Personally, I would fund the border wall since it would stem illegal immigration some, though there may be good factual reasons to exclude certain areas:  


Records Show Where Trump Plans to Build Texas Border Wall


And, importantly, it would take away the southern border illegal entry issue away from the GOP in 2020. 


There will still be people clogging the legal border crossings seeking asylum, probably in far higher numbers after the wall is built, and illegal entry by a variety of means including tunnels under the war and scaling over the wall in remote areas. 


Nothing proposed by the republicans would ameliorate the harsh conditions that cause people to walk over a thousand miles to the U.S.  carrying almost no belongings other than the clothes they are wearing. That is just plain desperate. 


Instead, Trump is threatening to cut off aid for those countries, which is insignificant, unless they become more aggressive in stopping the migration. Trump threatens to cut Central America aid over migrant caravan | Reuters The republicans have already cut aid 40% compared to the 2016 numbers. 


+++

1. Sold Remaining NVS Shares at $86.36-Used Commission Free Trade:




Quote: Novartis AG ADR (NVS)


Profit Snapshot: $265.79



$265.79 attributable to 10/18 Elimination
Rationale: Profit Taking

I also had a negative reaction to this acquisition announcement: Novartis announces planned acquisition of Endocyte to expand expertise in radiopharmaceuticals and build on commitment to transformational therapeutic platforms (offer value = $2.1B)


Last Substantive DiscussionsItem # 3 Sold 108+ NVS at $83.66 (9/12/18 Post)Item # 1.B. Added 2 NVS at $77.91, 2 at $76.9, and 18 at $77.34-Used Commission Free trades (4/30/18 Post)


Last Sell Discussion: Item # 3.D Sold 10 NVS at $85.96 and 5 at $86.5-Used Commission Free Trades (10/10/18 Post)


2018 NVS Trading Profits $1,454.88 ($1,189.09 prior trades)


Almost all of the shares sold received the 2018 annual dividend payment. 


Last Earnings Report: Q/E 9/30/18


Novartis delivered strong growth and innovation during the third quarter, including progressing advanced therapy platforms to drive future growth



Products:













Novartis Interim Financial Report - Q3 2018


I am looking for a first re-entry point at less than $76.  

2. Small Ball-Commission Free ETFs at Vanguard

A. Added 5 DES at $28.95, 5 at $28.1 and 5 at $27.66-Commission Free for Vanguard Brokerage Customers:





Maximum Position: 300 Shares

Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule for now

Dividend: Monthly at a variable rate




Some Holdings:








B. Bought 50 VRP at $24.53-Commission Free for Vanguard Brokerage Customers:



QuoteInvesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF Overview

Closing Price Yesterday: VRP $24.40 -$0.06 -0.25% 


Sponsor's websiteInvesco - Product Detail


This old post contains a detailed discussion of this ETF: Income And Risk Assessment Balancing-Bought 100 Of The ETF VRP - South Gent | Seeking Alpha That lot has been sold as noted below.


Current Position: 50 Shares


Maximum Position: 150 Shares


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule (probably 20 share lots)


Dividend Reinvestment: No


Dividends: Monthly at a variable rate





Last Ex Dividend Date: 10/22 (shortly after purchase)


Portfolio:



A number of securities owned by this fund have fixed-to-floating rates. I recently discussed a fixed-to-floating rate preferred stock in this post: Item # 1 TWOPRC Those securities pay a fixed coupon for several years after the IPO and are not in most cases variable rate securities now.

The fund also owns several exchange traded floating rate equity preferred stocks that pay the greater of a minimum coupon or a spread over some short term rate. None of them to my knowledge pay the spread rate yet. Stocks, Bonds & Politics: Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity Preferred Floating Rate Securities (trading profits currently at $23,395.99, see snapshots therein)


Examples (all $25 par; non-cumulative): 
Morgan Stanley Non-Cum. Pfd. Series AProspectus 
MetLife Inc. Floating Rate Non-Cum. Pfd. Series AProspectus
Zions Bancorp N.A Fltg. Rate Non-Cum. Perp. Pfd. Series AProspectus 
SunTrust Banks Inc. Perp. Pfd. Series AProspectus 

In short the majority of positions in this fund are not currently paying a variable rate but a fixed coupon rate. 

One potential advantage of a fixed-to-floating rate security is that the short term rate may be so high that the issuer will exercise the option to redeem, which would turn the potentially perpetual preferred stock into a term one. That option is normally triggered when the rate converts from the fixed to the variable rate. I say a benefit because short term interest rates would be high in that scenario and at least the investor may get their money back without having to sell the security for a large loss. 


Previous Sell Discussions:


Item # 6 Sold 272 VRP at $24.88 Update For Exchange Traded Bond And Preferred Stock Basket As Of 7/7/17 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


Item # 2 Eliminated VRP Sold 100 at $25.2 Update For Exchange Traded Bonds And Preferred Stock Basket Strategy As 7/29/2016 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha

Realized Gains To Date = $149.81

3. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:

A. Bought 2 Treasury Bills at Auction Maturing on 12/11/18 (the first two month T Bill Auction):

IR: 2.207%

No intermediate bond purchases have been made in weeks. I am redeploying proceeds from maturing bonds and CDs mostly into short term treasuries bought at auction or in the secondary market.  

Action Results:



At the time of purchase, the highest yielding CD maturing in December had a 2% coupon:




B. Bought 1 Wells Fargo 3% CD (monthly interest payments) Maturing on 10/26/20:



This is the first 3% two year CD that I have been able to purchase in several years.


At the time of purchase, the yield on the 2 year treasury note was at 2.86%:


U.S. 2 Year Treasury Note-MarketWatch


C.  Bought 1 Treasury 2.25% Coupon Maturing on 2/28/20:

YTM = 2.765%


I now own 2 bonds.


4. Small Ball- Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy:

A. Bought 10 GOOD at $18.35 and 10 at $18.15-Used Fidelity Commission Free Trade:






Quote: Gladstone Commercial Corp. (GOOD)


Closing Price Yesterday: GOOD $18.52 +$0.13 +0.71% 


Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy


Website: Gladstone Commercial | Monthly Dividend REIT


Current Position This Account: 40+ shares


Maximum Position this Account: 100 shares + shares bought with dividends


Average Cost Per Share this Account: $18.9


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule

Total Position All Accounts: 90+ shares (50 share position in Schwab account will remain static except for dividend reinvestments)


Dividend: Monthly at $.125 per share ($1.5 per share annually)


Dividend Yield at TC Per Share = 7.94%


Last Ex Dividend Date: 10/18/18 (shortly after these purchases)


Dividend Reinvestment: Yes


Last Substantive DiscussionItem # 3.A. Bought 50 GOOD at $19.4-Used Schwab Commission Free Trade  (8/8/2018)


I have nothing further to add to that recent discussion.


B. Bought 10 DEA at $17.76-Used Fidelity Commission Free Trade:




Quote: Easterly Government Properties Inc. Stock Quote


Closing Price Yesterday: DEA $18.18 +$0.15 +0.83% 


"As of June 30, 2018, the Company wholly owned 47 operating properties in the United States, encompassing approximately 3.7 million square feet in the aggregate, including 45 operating properties that were leased primarily to U.S. Government tenant agencies and two operating properties that were entirely leased to private tenants. As of June 30, 2018, the portfolio had an average age of 12.7 years, was 100% occupied, and had a weighted average remaining lease term of 7.7 years."


Recent News


Easterly Government Properties Acquires Eight of the Fourteen Properties in Previously Announced Portfolio Acquisition


Easterly Government Properties Announces Pricing of Common Stock Offering (public offering price at $19.25)


Current Position This Account: 20 shares


Maximum Position in Fidelity Taxable Account: 100 Shares

I also own 60 shares in my Schwab taxable account where I may round up to 100 shares. 

Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule


Average Cost Per Share: $18.32


Dividend: Quarterly at $.26 per share ($1.04 annually)


Dividends | Easterly Government Properties, Inc.


Easterly Government Properties Announces Quarterly Dividend


Dividend Yield at TC per share= 5.68%


Last Ex Dividend Date: 9/12/18


Last Substantive DiscussionSold 10 DEA at $21.44-Used Commission Free Trade (5/17/18 Post)-Item # 1.A. Bought 10 DEA at $19.18 (3/8/18 Post)


See also: Item 5. A. Sold 50 DEA at $21.59-Used Commission Free Trade (12/11/17 Post)-Item # 3.A.  Bought 50 DEA $19.64 (8/19/17 Post)


DEA Trading Profits = $120.44


Last Earnings Report: Q/E 6/30/18


Easterly Government Properties Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results 


FFO:           $.29 per share

Adj. FFO:   $.25 (e.g. excludes non-cash revenues)
CAD:           $.1925

The share count included 20.7M shares sold in the June public offering and another 1.010+M sold in DEA's ATM program at an average gross price of $20.2 per share. 


I regard DEA's earnings reports to be more forthright in computing cash flow than most REITs who engage in a variety of techniques to make their cash flow per share numbers look better than they are. 


One notable item is the deduction for routine maintenance expenses from FFO to arrive at CAD or Cash Available for Distribution.  





The 2018 FFO per share was guided to $1.17 to $1.22. 

I focus on the CAD number. Currently, CAD per share is substantially below the quarterly dividend of $.26 per share. Given the recent share offering used to finance acquisitions, it may take a couple of quarters before I can form a judgment on the tightness of dividend coverage with free cash flow. 


5. Small Ball- REGIONAL BANK BASKET STRATEGY:


A. Bought 5 FHB at $25.75, 5 at $25.25 and 5 at $24.4-Used Fidelity Commission Free Trades:





Quote: First Hawaiian Inc. (FHB)

Closing Price Yesterday: FHB $24.12 +$0.22 +0.92% 


FHB Analyst Estimates (as of 10/13/18)

2019: $2.18

Third quarter earnings are scheduled to be released tomorrow. Regional bank stocks have been hit hard after issuing third quarter reports showing negative or anemic loan growth compared to the previous quarter. I will discuss the report in a comment section to this post. 


REGIONAL BANK BASKET STRATEGY GATEWAY POST


Current Position This Account: 50+ shares


Maximum Position in this Account: 100 Shares + shares purchased with dividends


Average Total Cost Per Share this Account: $27.22


Highest Cost Lot This Account: 10 shares at $29.11 (first lot in chain: 12/4/17)


Total Position All Accounts: 152+ shares (Schwab position will remain static except for dividend reinvestments)


Dividend: Quarterly at $.24 per share ($.96 per share annually)


Dividend Yield at $27.22 Total Cost Per Share: 3.53 %


Last Ex Dividend: 8/24/18


Dividend Reinvestment: Yes at less than $30 per share


Last Substantive DiscussionItem # 4.A. (9/30/18 Post)


Last Sell DiscussionItem # 1.A. Sold 10 FHB at $30.76 (6/21/18 Post)



DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

35 comments:

  1. "As is normally the case, republicans require no proof to make that assertion which is meant to manipulate the easily manipulated and brain dead since conception. This is how authoritarian minded leaders provide false narratives justifying their power."

    Yesterday Trump actually stated, regarding the caravan, "there's no proof of anything." You could not make this stuff up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know if any viewers here saw Ralph Nader on C-SPAN, you should go to the replay, like he said, the Republicans are "energized" by corporate/big money, but the Democrats are "compromised" b/c they take money from Pharma, Health Insurance and Hospital Special Interests. He said per-capita Canada's cost is $3500.00/ ours is $9500.00, he said Americans overwhelming want Medicare for all.He said Obama spouts- off and pontificates about "minimum wages" but NEVER SAYS WHAT $ IT SHOULD BE. He is so right! Should it be $15.00/hr, like some municipalities have mandated? Nader goes on..." Adjusted for inflation the $7.35/hr Fed min wage should be $11.50/hr now. ..Sen Eliz Warren has calculated $22.50..." Great interview, Nader pin-pointing how the Democrats do not get specific on issues they used to stand for.

      Delete
    2. I would label the Democrat message in this election as diffused and non-specific. The primary message is that they are not Trump. There is no unified message like the republicans routinely generate like tax cuts for everybody, "immigration reform", build a wall, stop the caravan, reduce regulations, etc.

      https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/may/22/tina-smith/minimum-wage-worth-less-now-50-years-ago/

      The Democrats would certainly be more in favor of increasing the federal minimum wage than the republicans.

      Minimum age growth has fallen way behind increases in income created by productivity.

      https://www.epi.org/publication/the-top-charts-of-2016-13-charts-that-show-the-difference-between-the-economy-we-have-now-and-the-economy-we-could-have/

      Delete
  2. The regional bank stock ETF KRE is now in bear market territory with no signs of a trend reversal:

    SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE)
    $51.65 -$1.45 (-2.73%)
    As of 12:27PM EDT.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/KRE?ql=1&p=KRE

    52 Week High: $66.04
    % Off High = -21.79%

    For now, I will continue buying in small lots, spending about $500 per week in sprinkle buys.

    Equity REITs are a bright spot today so far:

    Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ)
    $78.55 +$1.18 (+1.53%)
    As of 12:30PM EDT
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VNQ/?p=VNQ

    The REITs are receiving an assist from the decline in interest rates:

    iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF)
    $100.725 +$0.335 (+0.33%)
    As of 12:31PM EDT.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IEF/?p=IEF

    Bonds have had a negative total return year so far. That treasury ETF had a total return of -3.31% YTD through yesterday:

    http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=IEF&region=USA&culture=en_US

    I am individual bond heavy with the largest weighting in 0-3 year maturities. I am cash heavy in my Vanguard accounts where the Vanguard Prime MM fund now has a 7 day yield of 2.21%:

    https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/profile/VMMXX

    ReplyDelete
  3. Today I noticed my RBC stepped-bonds got called>
    BONDS - FULL CALL (78010UCX3), ROYAL BK CANADA, 3.0%, due , 10/23/2025, Sold 35M @ 100

    That's kind of interesting because the base rate of interest has been 3%, I think is low for a bank... so I really had not watched it to expect a call. The step-up to 4% and then 5% were in out-years. Anyway, I put $50K in 1-month CD paying 2% # 657156FF7 I realize that is only $88.00 in interest, but I'm fine with that. I am laddering 1-3 month CDs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Stock Jocks spent their wad yesterday bringing the market back and got out of the way as the indexes spiraled down today into the close.

    I used the pop in PG shares to unload my highest cost lots profitably.

    Procter & Gamble Co.
    $89.46 +$2.30 +2.64%
    DAY RANGE $87.22 - $90.70
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pg

    In addition to equity REITs, electric utility and consumer staple stocks bucked the downtrend.

    Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
    $55.23 +$1.31 +2.43%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlu

    Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
    $33.01 +$0.1491 +0.45%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/fsta

    I will be up today in my accounts due to the heavy concentration in bonds with consumer staples, REITs and other bond like consumer stocks in the plus column as well.

    iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF)
    $100.93 +$0.54 +0.54%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/ief

    iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
    $114.78 +$0.86 +$0.75%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/tlt

    BDCs are performing badly which is to be expected in a volatile stock market.

    CBOE Volatility Index 25.23 +4.52 +21.83%

    I still do not have a single day that qualifies in my day count for a Trigger Event.

    There was 24 new 52 week highs on the NYSE today and 425 new 52 week los.

    http://www.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3021-newhinyse-newhighs.html?mod=topnav_2_3024

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for very much for the new lows vs new highs data, what I follow is the "breadth" on this person's stockcharts>

    https://stockcharts.com/public/1092905/tenpp/1

    the "breadth indicator" has been plummeting. This is the number of stocks in the S&P above the 50-day moving average. Look at the S&P line above, and you can see the S&P index has gone up while the "breadth" has gone down. So, that means there are less stocks moving up the index than there are down stocks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There is a snapback rally today:

    S&P 500 Index 2,695.10 +39.00 +1.47%
    Last Updated: Oct 25, 2018 at 10:51 a.m. EDT

    The current 200 day SMA line for SPX is at 2,767+ using a YF one year chart.

    I view today's rally so far as weak kneed and not very convincing. A bad sign would be a significant weakening from current levels into the close.

    I checked my recent buys in the regional bank sector, which has been pummeled, and I am actually closer to a $1K average in weekly buys than $500 over the past two weeks. I am catching a falling knife in those purchases.

    Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD)
    $73.60 -$8.65 (-10.52%)
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BUD?p=BUD

    I do not own BUD's common stock. The company slashed its dividend by 50% today and reported lower than expected earnings and revenues. E.P.S. was reported at $.82 cents a share on revenue that fell nearly 10% year over year, to $13.28 billion. The consensus estimate was for $1.01 on revenue of $14.01 billion. Beer sales are not doing so well and BUD took on a lot of debt to acquire Miller.

    I do have a small position in BUD senior unsecured bonds which I have bought and sold. The dividend cut is a plus for the bond owners but the earnings report takes away that added comfort IMO and creates an increased level of anxiety.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AT&T is taking a beating. I'm tempted to "buy when there's blood in the streets" but my more cautious nature says no. My appetite for risk is low!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cathie: I am not an admirer of AT & T. I do not regard the stock as a long term hold. Given the disfavor that I regard it, I will take no more than a 100 share position now and will use only my small ball strategy to buy. I am currently holding 52+ share at an average cost per share of $32.69.

      I do have an ongoing small ball buying program that is actually striving to mature into T Ball. The last buy was ten shares at $30.17 (7/25/18), so I am permitted to buy at below that price. The next order will be just 2 to 5 shares using a Fidelity commission free trade. My feel is that institutions are not done yet selling in response to the last earnings report.

      This small ball strategy is primarily a risk management one and is more tailored to stocks or sectors in bear markets which is the case for AT & T whose shares peaked at $39.33 back in December 2017. If you pull up a five year chart, that reflects a bear market trend going back to June 2016.

      The problem is similar to BUD. AT & T took on a lot of debt to buy DirectTV and that business is sputtering; and then more debt was assumed in the Time Warner deal:

      https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/25/atts-media-bets-drag-the-stock-to-its-worst-year-since-2008.html

      Delete
    2. Good advice. I tried trading T and BP, both darlings for yield-chasing. I was amazed at how fast they are sold on any selloffs, all dividends for a year can be wiped-out in 1-2 days. I think options traders in charge, not sure. I think T has plans to lower dividend if merger goes thru also, to be more in line with industry -like Verizon's

      Delete
    3. The merger with Time Warner has already been consummated.

      The BUD 50% dividend slash is the latest example of what can happen to a dividend when a company ends up with too much debt after a buying one or more companies, assuming the existing debt and issuing a lot more to fund the acquisition.

      The dividend cut possibility increases in that scenario when interest rates go up, the debt is downgraded and the acquired businesses prove to be less than stellar buys as revenues and earnings stagnant or go down.

      The government challenged the AT & T merger on antitrust grounds and lost at the Federal District Court level. The government has appealed and oral arguments are scheduled for later this year. It is possible that the government will win with the relief being a divestiture of some parts of the Time Warner acquisition. I doubt that will happen but it is a potential risk to AT & T's stock.

      I do not see an AT & T dividend cut in the near future, but that is always a possibility for companies that grow by taking on large amounts of debt. Defaulting on senior unsecured debt is not an option. Cutting the dividend is an option.


      AT & T's total debt is over $190B.

      https://investors.att.com/~/media/Files/A/ATT-IR/financial-reports/debt/2018/2q18/Debt_List_2Q18.pdf

      Delete
    4. So the Gov't is appealing the merger. I stand by my idea that the blended-rate of AT&T-Time Warner dividend will not be out-sized like it is now. Buying it here thinking it will be maintained over 6% or here at 6.67% is pure folly. This is a sucker's bet if I ever saw it.

      Delete
    5. 5-yr chart of AT&T
      http://schrts.co/YXnBkg > this should collapse to $27 area, all dividend-chasers are/will be wiped out, I cut small losses, and lost money trying to play dividends in T, BP, F, and i monitor closely. IT IS A LOSER'S GAME. Try it and find out.

      Delete
    6. I did buy 3 shares today at $29.25, bringing my total up to 55+ shares with a maximum allocation of 100 shares plus shares bought with dividends. I do not anticipate that this 3 share buy order will earn me the Medal of Honor awarded by the Stock Jocks.

      The current AT & T consensus E.P.S. forecast for 2019 is $3.6 per share.

      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/t/analystestimates

      The P/E at that estimate and a $29.25 price is 8.13. The dividend yield at an all-in cost of $29.25 is 6.84%.

      Sprinkle buying was the approach today, focusing on higher dividend yield stocks, including regional banks, BDCs, and equity REITs. The total expenditure was about $1800 spread over 11 orders using commission free trades or buying commission free ETFs, with one no minimum mutual fund buy of $50. I am not being brave here.

      Delete
  8. First Hawaiian (FHB), discussed in this post, reported core E.P.S. of $.52 in the third quarter, up from $.41 in the year ago quarter. The core number excludes some one time items to the $.5 GAAP E.P.S. The major addition to GAAP net income of a $4.125M litigation settlement of a purported class action suit involving overdraft fees. There were 1 subtraction involving a tax adjustment.

    Most of the numbers were okay to good except there was no loan growth from the prior quarter and was up only 3.7% Y-O-Y. There was a slightly negative growth in deposits. Investors have been obsessing about those numbers and have penalized banks for similar or even better Y-O-Y loan growth numbers.

    Excellent Numbers:

    (1) Total non-performing assets were $11.3 million, or 0.09% of total loans and leases

    (2) 19.61% core return on average tangible stockholders' equity

    (3) Net charge offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 were $3.8 million, or 0.12% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis

    (4) The efficiency ratio was 49.4%, 48.0% and 46.3% for the quarters ended September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. Core efficiency ratio1 was 46.9%, 47.6% and 46.7% for the quarters ended September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively

    ROA at 1.31% was close to average.

    NIM was basically okay under the circumstances in that it managed creep up to 3.11% from 2.96% in the year ago quarter but fell from 3.18% in prior quarter due in part to higher funding costs.

    A big boost in the Y-O-Y E.P.S. can be traced to the lower federal income tax rate.

    I don't see this report as causing a stampede of buyers. My question for tomorrow is how investors will react to the loan and deposit numbers given that the shares have already been pummeled.

    I will continue my small ball buying program in 5 share lots using commission free trades. Each lot will have to be purchased at the lowest price in the chain-the small ball trading restriction.

    ReplyDelete
  9. South Gent,

    To mitigate the risk in a volatile market most retail investors will stop buying and sell some to build up cash position. Selling begets more selling.

    Some will wait for an entry point. If I see good names with decent dividends, I will just buy some and forget about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: I would be very pleased to see a 50% decline in SPX from its recent high. I am already in my bunker and barely peaking out to watch the fireworks.

      I am doing small ball buys on the way down, but it is meaningless to me so far.

      IRM is getting hammered today after an analyst downgrade. IRM raised its quarterly dividend yesterday.

      https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/iron-mountain-reports-third-quarter-2018-results-300737320.html

      Iron Mountain Inc $30.30 -$2.40 -7.34%
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/irm

      I know own 35+ shares. Prior to today, the last small ball buy was at $30.93. The new low in the chain is now at $30.3.

      Delete
    2. South Gent,

      This might be the time we have been patiently waiting for. SPX is at 2658.

      I am also thinking of CEFs to diversify and minimize the risk of picking individual stocks, and at the same time take advantage of the potential double discount from depressed stock prices and widening discount to their NAV. Thoughts? Did you have any success with CEF's during the 2008-2009 period?

      Delete
    3. Y: I did buy some stock and balanced CEFs during the Near Depression period and its aftermath. ADX for example would have been a frequent buy. Possibly more money went into stock mutual funds in 2009.

      Frequently, the discounts for many of them remained elevated in the 10% to 15% range, like ADX so there is only a marginal benefit associated with a narrowing of the discount. Others are probably selling at less than their average 1, 3 and/or 5 year discounts.

      RMT, which is one that I have successfully traded and do not currently own, closed last Friday at a -11.10% discount vs. an average 3 year discount of -12.14%. The average discount for 1 year is -7.38% which is lower than the current one probably due to the recent jitters, but that is still below the longer term average numbers.

      You can find that kind of historical discount information under the Pricing Information tab at CEF Connect.

      https://www.cefconnect.com/fund/RMT

      Instead of buying CEFs, I will stick with modest adds to dividend paying stocks and I have started to throw small sums into two Fidelity zero expense, zero minimum investment funds which I will discuss in my next post along with my usual strict and structured buy programs.

      I would view it as probable that the zero expense total stock mutual fund will end up having a better TOTAL RETURN number than most stock CEFs, particularly the ones using leverage and those that try to use a buy-write strategy. The dividend payments will be lower however.

      One of the better non-leveraged CEF stock funds is ADX which does not support and never has to my knowledge its dividend with ROC. I have traded that CEF successfully in the past but do not currently own any shares. It was sold as part of my overall stock allocation reduction as were all of the other stock CEFs including RMT, GAM, CET, etc.

      https://www.cefconnect.com/fund/ADX

      I do not have any reason to believe at this time that the ongoing downtrend is over. We are moving closer to an all out trade war with China. The FED is gradually taking the punch bowl away. Profit margins for a lot of firms are under pressure. My gut tells me that the bears are still in charge of the directional move, overwhelming the buyers with waves of sell orders.

      Fidelity also has a low cost S & P 500 ETF, IVV.
      https://screener.fidelity.com/ftgw/etf/goto/snapshot/snapshot.jhtml?symbols=IVV

      The thing about that opinion regarding more downside to come is that it can of course be wrong.

      So I am buying on the big down days but my purchases represent extreme caution and conservatism consistent with my capital preservation and income generation objectives.

      My bonds are providing me with ballast and a constant stream of redemption proceeds that I can redeploy based on opportunities as they develop.

      Delete
    4. South Gent,

      Thanks for your insights on CEFs. I need to do more research on the individual CEF names.

      I bought some CLM and CRF last week, based on their discount to their respective low price points in 2008/9, 2016 and 2018. Their premium/discount levels are also at the low end relative to their respective 2008/9, 2016 and 2018 levels.

      Interestingly these two CEF carry very high dividends and have active following in SA.

      Delete
    5. Y: I am prejudiced against CEFs that sell at a premium. CLM is currently at a +2.43% premium to net asset value per share and the 3 year average is at +12.95%. That is a 10% loss just from the premium shrinkage.

      Distributions are heavily supported by ROC. See Distributions tab:

      https://www.cefconnect.com/fund/CLM

      The 10 year annual average total return at +16.51% based on price is good. I have never owned it.

      The 10 year average total return of SPY is at 14.12%:

      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=SPY&region=USA&culture=en_US

      QQQX is better at +18.17%:
      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/cef/total-returns.action?t=QQQX&region=usa&culture=en-US

      https://www.cefconnect.com/fund/QQQX

      When looking at a fund that heavily supports a dividend with ROC, I would look at several years of shareholder reports to measure the decline in assets. The fund is basically liquidating through ROC unless it is able to sell stock at a premium to net asset value per share.

      Delete
    6. Y: I spent a few minutes looking into CLM. In my opinion, the fund is enticing investors through a dividend that is sourced primarily from return their capital. That results in a liquidation of fund assets. Gradually, unless the fund replenishes assets, there will eventually be no assets to generate income.

      The fund has been able to entice existing investors to buy more shares through rights offerings.

      "On July 25, 2018, the Fund issued 26.8 million shares of common stock at a price of $13.46 at the completion of its one-for-three rights offering which expired on July 20, 2018. The net proceeds of $360,286,890 will be used by the Fund in accordance with the prospectus for the rights offering."
      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814083/000111183018000190/fp0035444_ncsrs.htm

      The net asset value per share was $12.58 on 7/26/18. So by paying far more than the fund is able to earn in dividends, the fund enticed existing shareholders to replenish the coffers by buying more shares at a premium to net asset value per share.

      Based on a brief look, the 5 and 10 year total return numbers are misleading since the fund had a limited amount of assets until two subscription right offerings.

      I do not go back that far until I found another subscription rights offering. This one was at $14.43 in September 2016.

      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814083/000139834416018643/fp0021651_497.htm

      I found another and then quit looking. If you go back to 12/31/2010, the fund had only $64+M in assets.


      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814083/000090901211000210/t306287.txt

      Based on those historical observations, the fund apparently decided to grow by paying an excessive dividend-the shiny object-and then sell additional stock at premium prices to existing shareholders through subscription rights offerings.

      If you look at the shareholder report for the six months ending 6/30/18 at page 9, you will see that $51.4+ M of the dividends paid during the first six months was sourced from returning the shareholder's capital to them.

      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814083/000111183018000190/fp0035444_ncsrs.htm

      Eventually, at some unknown time in the future, this strategy of raising capital at premium prices and returning the shareholders capital through excessive dividend payments will cease to work. That time may be the next bear market when individuals are fleeing from CEFs as discounts expand or premiums evaporate and turn to discounts, and consequently would have no interest in participating in a subscription rights offering which I do not like in any eventuality.


      Delete
  10. Another perspective on Trump from Andrew Bacevich, author of "Twilight of the American Century."

    "Donald Trump’s tenure as the 45th U.S. president may last another few weeks, another year, or another 16 months. However unsettling the prospect, the leaky vessel that is the S.S. Trump might even manage to stay afloat for a second term. Nonetheless, recent headline-making revelations suggest that, like some derelict ship that's gone aground, the Trump presidency may already have effectively run its course. What, then, does this bizarre episode in American history signify?"

    http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/176466/tomgram%3A_andrew_bacevich%2C_the_president_as_pimple/#more

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cathie: Donald claimed recently that he had 100 photographs of Comey and Mueller kissing. A reporter requested copies through a freedom of information act request, and the government said there were none.

      Delete
    2. Right. No proof of anything. But in Trumpworld, "I don't have to show you any stinking proof!"

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stinking_badges

      Delete
  11. Given the volatility intra-day and a 1.73% decline in SPX, it is extremely anomalous to see the VIX close down .06 or .25%.

    CBOE Volatility Index (^VIX)
    24.16-0.06 (-0.25%)
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EVIX?p=^VIX&.tsrc=fin-srch

    While the closing VIX number is elevated, I still do not have a single day in my Trigger Event count. I only use closing numbers. Intra-day the VIX did spike to 27.47, but that was in the morning session.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You said: "I do not see an AT & T dividend cut in the near future, but that is always a possibility for companies that grow by taking on large amounts of debt. Defaulting on senior unsecured debt is not an option. Cutting the dividend is an option."
    Again, this is great advice, and expertise. My opinion, for anyone reading this great blog, is if you are looking for dividends, which I did, in AT&T or BP, there are leveraged hedgefunds using these stocks to "scalp" dividends using timing that you can not compete with, and the market-maker for these stocks (not "equities", that is a bullcrap word to make you think you "own something)... the market-maker is in collusion perhaps even with large owners of stock with these high dividend-paying stocks. They control and are themselves short on downturns in the market. This is an apparatus that is not understood by retail "investors" reading this blog. I believe all the high-dividend-paying stocks are controlled, to wipe-out dumbarse-retail who are investors thinking they will earn a dividend or their mutual fund manager has put them into a (dividend-paying ETF)that exceeds their other options, which is 2.2% yield, basically. These mutual fund arsewholes will not go to jail because they told their "investors" they are in "passive ETFs" The accountants that have enabled a massive flows into the last 10-years of NON-GAAP "forward operating pro -forma NON-GAAP "earnings" These accountants should be in jail. How do you persistantly have a 35% gap between GAAP and NON-GAAP earnings announcements? Why is their no outrage? How do these Corps get away with perpetual "one-time" charges? This is a scandal that rivals the "back-dating of stock options" is anyone here is old enough to remember.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have been successfully trading AT & T for a long time. This year has been a tough one, but I did sell profitably a 10 share lot at $37.77 (1/22/18).

      Item # 1.E
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/01/observations-and-sample-of-recent_28.html

      Last year, I sold a total of 80 shares at $37.36 and at $36.41.

      The largest single sell was in 2010 when I sold 202 shares for a $750.6 profit.

      Snapshot at Item # 1.A
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/07/observations-and-sample-of-recent_25.html

      I have never taken a loss.

      There is always the question whether I have gone back to well once too often. I manage risk in AT & T shares through (1) keeping my position small and (2) averaging down in small lots. After collecting a number of dividends, and when there is a price pop that creates a profitable exit point, I will sell. I do not regard T as a long term hold.

      I did start the current chain at too high of a price in retrospect, buying 10 shares at $35.42 using a commission free trade.

      I anticipate that AT & T will raise the quarterly rate by $.01 per share in the 2019 first quarter.

      At the moment, there is a lot of institutional selling and a shortage of buyers that is causing the price decline.

      Under my small ball trading rules, my next purchase will have to below $29.25. If the price falls to $27 as you suggest, I will still be buying in small lots as I work my way up to 100 shares.

      Delete
    2. My first trade in T was in 2016. Bought at $36.70 on 10/24/16, sold 12/21/16 at $42.55. Realized gain = $1170.00 on 200 shares. Amazing luck.

      This time around, terrible timing. Bought 100 shares 10/13/17 at $35.60, still waiting for a profitable exit point. Unrealized loss on this trade, including dividends received, is -$650.

      Maybe I should sell now and consider the two trades combined to be an overall win.

      Three out of four immediate family members are former employees of AT&T. Family trust owns a significant position going back many years. They will hold indefinitely. So I do watch T pretty closely.

      Delete
    3. Cathie: While AT & T has an uncomfortable amount of debt, it also has prodigious free cash flow. Marketwatch calculates the free cash flow number last year at $17.6 billion which covered the $12.04B in common stock dividends and $433M in stock buybacks.

      Free cash flow in the last quarter was up 16.6% to $6.5B. "Free cash flow is defined as cash from operations minus Capital expenditures."

      https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20181024005402/en/ATT-Reports-Third-Quarter-Results

      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/t/financials/cash-flow

      AT & T is a major beneficiary of the lower federal income rate.

      see page 37:
      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000119312518236782/d592180d10q.htm

      Sentiment among institutional investors runs chilly to warm and back. We are now in the chilly phase.

      Possibly, there will be improved sentiment when and if the Appellate Court affirms the district court decision rejecting the DOJ's antitrust objections to the merger.

      I will be buying a few more shares when I see the price fall below $29. I believe my buy from last Friday at $29.25 was the lowest price paid in several years.

      I am reinvesting the dividend. The next one is paid on 11/1.

      Delete
  13. Tennindependent is far smarter regarding AT&T,(symbol= T) because he has a keen knowledge of how much to invest in T and when to sell. I stand by my comments, I think AT&T has too high of a dividend "payout-ratio" and any buyers of this stock should not be in the stock market, unless they have the expertise of this author, who has years of experience.
    If you bought AT&T at $38, you are a DUMBASS. If you think you can "average-down", again you are a DUMBASS. Reality is, unless you have experience like the author of this blog, who has impeccable timing and patience, you are losing money, which makes you a DUMBASS, and I am very qualified to call anyone reading my comment a Dumbass because I have around $650K laddered in CDs cash. I, like readers of this blog, have been inticed to find a higher yield of dividends, but I reiterate, unless you have the expertise and patience and portfolio like this blog author has, it's probably not a good investment for you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be helpful if you would omit in the future your opinions about other investors decisions.

      I make plenty of investment decisions that turn out wrong and my trades rarely have impeccable timing. Anyone who routinely takes risks, as I have done for almost 6 decades, will have an abundance of failures. My most serious failures has been a failure to hold shares that I bought and sold in the past. Only a few buy and hold decisions would have increased my current wealth by several million.

      One key is that you have to be willing to lose money in order to make it. That is inherent in the stock market.

      I structure and limit my risks.

      I do not have to sell any anything to pay expenses.

      I can hold AT & T, buy a limited number of share at lower prices, stop when I hit my predefined maximum limit set by a judgment of the risk/reward, and reinvest the dividends, until it works out or I have no better option than to sell and harvest a tax loss which I can invariably use to reduce my tax obligation after netting with gains. What is required is patience and discipline. My stock market investing is highly structured and subject to an array of risk management and risk mitigation rules which have become far more numerous and detailed as I age. I am a totally unemotional investor.

      Delete
  14. Here's a 5-yr chart of T, it has some support in the $27-29 area, I am not trying to bash anyone who paid too much because they thought it was a good dividend, I have done that also, and I lost money, but I always cut my losses quickly when I know I am wrong. I think there are leveraged hedgefunds, who margined to buy these high-dividend payers. The Margin debt for the NYSE has been around a record $650 Billion, but that does not include the negative cash sweeps/moneymarket accounts that these hedgefunds have ,which add about $200 Billion, which is a record, so it's actually a margin debt of closer to $1 Billion to buy stocks. I believe many "schemes" by these hedgefunds have been to borrow on margin, and "scalp" the dividends, like on AT&T, but they have computers that are programmed, and use put options and have ways to drive the stock down, expecially after ex-dividend date, and so they make money after the dividend is payed out.

    http://schrts.co/uSn8qE

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/10/observations-and-sample-of-recent_28.html

    ReplyDelete