Saturday, January 5, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: AEB, BIF, FHN, HOPE, MSPRA

Economy

A
ccording to the BLS, the U.S. economy added 312K jobs last month. Average hourly earnings rose 11 cents and have increased 3.2% over the past year. The average work week increased by .1 of an hour. The prior two months were increased by 58K. The unemployment rate rose to 3.9%, but that was due in large part to a 419K increase in the labor force. Employment Situation Summary This was a strong report. Brian Wesbury summary.pdf 


U.S. gains 312,000 jobs in 10-month high that shattered Wall Street forecasts - MarketWatch


December private payrolls rise 271K vs. 178K est.: ADP/Moody's


Bad omen for economy? Manufacturers grow at slowest pace in two years, ISM finds - MarketWatch

Powell says Fed 'will be patient' with monetary policy as it watches how economy performs Some talking heads attribute the market's rebound last Friday to statements made by Chairman Powell. (e.g. 
Cramer: The Fed may have just set the Trump rally back on its course) Powell has recently made substantially similar statements, and I found nothing new in his statements last Friday. 


Cramer is just one of many who view a 2.25% to 2.5% federal funds rate as far too high, notwithstanding the fact that this range is far below normal for past expansion cycles and was gradually reached from a zero bound range with unemployment near 60 year lows and real GDP growth over 2% every year since 2012 except for the 1.88% growth rate in 2016. US Real GDP Growth Rate by Year 




Civilian Unemployment Rate-St. Louis Fed




Effective Federal Funds Rate-St. Louis Fed





Bank Prime Loan Rate-St. Louis Fed




Real Gross Domestic Product-St. Louis Fed


Longer Term Chart
Real Gross Domestic Product Growth Rates by Quarter- St. Louis Fed

My current thinking is that the FED will raise the FF rate by .25% in the first half and then cut the rate back to the current level in the 2020 first half.

At most, I would expect two .25% increases this year rather than three which was the expectation contained in the last dot plot.

The Bond Ghouls are expecting no hikes this year, with the odds at 25.4% that there will be a rate decrease on or before the December meeting and only a 5% chance of a .25% hike before year end. Countdown to FOMC: CME FedWatch Tool The probability of a decrease from the current level on or before the January 2020 meeting is at 37.1%.

+++++++

Markets and Market Commentary

I would attribute the market's rebound last Friday to the strong jobs report and China's decision to add economic stimulus through lowering bank reserve requirements. 


The action of China's central bank will free up about $116B in capital for future loans. China slashes banks' reserve requirements again as growth slows | Reuters I view this as a risky form of economic stimulus since it increases the risk of bank insolvency. 


China's banks have had and many continue to have non-performing loans as a percent of total loans far in excess of an average U.S. bank. PwC CN: China's ballooning debt: Is it time to address it?China Banks Bad Loans Surge Most on Record Amid Deleveraging-BloombergFresh Doubts Raised on China's Bad-Loan Data-Bloomberg




Bristol-Myers to buy Celgene in a $74 billion deal

I am one day short of declaring a Trigger Event and have not started the day count over. One close below 20 in the VIX before one more close over 26 will restart the day count. 


Last year, there were two near Trigger Events. That indicates to me a market on a razor's edge. 


Since I was buying stocks and stock funds during the recent high volatility period, or what I simply call "buying into the volatility", I will likely be selling some recently bought positions when the VIX returns to multiple day movement below 20 accompanied by a move in SPX back to a range between 2,600 and 2,632. 


I view SPX 2,632, a former support line busted with gusto in early December, as likely to provide strong overhead resistance that may need some major positive catalyst to pierce, such as a new trade deal with China viewed by sophisticated investors as extremely favorable to U.S. businesses. 



+++++++

Trump

Demagogue Don asserted that he would keep the nine departments shut for years unless the Democrats agreed to spend $5B on the Duck's wall. 


Then, in almost the same breath, Petulant Don said that he had to power to spend those funds with no authorization from Congress, but preferred to keep the government in partial shutdown for years with hundreds of thousands of employees without a paycheck. Trump threatens years-long shutdown for his wall as GOP support begins to fracture 


House Democrats vote to reopen government and deny Trump wall money, defying veto threat

Retired four-star Gen. Stanley McChrystal says Trump is dishonest, immoral

Garry Kasparov on Our Dear and Great Leader: "Unlike the alleged leader of the free world, I prefer to speak from authority. Despite his claims of expertise on everything from foreign policy to campaign finance laws, every time Trump speaks off-script, the truth is revealed. He’s a Russian matryoshka doll of ignorance, with numerous layers of cluelessness wrapped up inside a total lack of self-awareness." Donald Trump, master revisionist: What he said about Afghanistan, and what it says about him - NY Daily News


Romney says Trump causes dismay around the world


McCaskill says GOP senators privately believe Trump is 'nuts' 


Trump falsely claims Mexico is paying for wall, demands taxpayer money for wall in meeting with Democrats


++++++


With the recent decline in interest rates, and the stubbornly low net interest margins, regional bank stocks have entered a bear market which is reflected in the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) chart. 

That does not prevent me from buying, but does dictate that I use the small ball strategy when making purchases. 

KRE hit a 52 week high at $66.04 on 6/7/18

The KRE closing price, when I first bought the 10 HOPE and 10 FHN discussed below, was at $50.71, or a 23.21% decline from that 52 week high. 

HOPE  hit a 52 week high at $19.48 (3/12/18) and was off -30.75% from that high at my purchase price of $13.49 and -40% when I bought another 10 shares at $11.69 shortly thereafter.   

Why bother trying to catch falling knives when the current herd consensus is predicting no positive change in the earnings outlook? 

Two reasons are concrete and another is mushy. 


The concrete reasons relate to valuation and dividend yield. 


The mushy reason has to do with unpredictable changes in the herd consensus opinion. 


It was only a few months ago that investors were worried about interest rates rising too fast and KRE responded by hitting a new all time high. 


When that opinion was tested by a very mild reversal in the upward interest rate trend, regional banks were crushed by more than 20%. This last reaction may prove to be an overreaction to a few data points suggesting a recession in 2019, though the reasonable prediction IMO remains no recession with about 2% real GDP growth. I am continuing to anticipate that net interest margins will be constrained throughout 2019 due to the flat yield curve. An investor in this sector does not want to see NIM remaining under pressure as non-performing loans and charge-offs accelerate to normal recession type levels.   


A. Bought 10 FHN at $14.59 and 10 at $12.62-Used Commission Free Trade




Quote: First Horizon National Corp. (FHN)


Closing Price Last Friday: FHN $13.81 +0.42 +3.14% 


FHN SEC Filings


FHN Consensus Analyst E.P.S. Estimates


On the day after this 10 share purchase, Morgan Stanley issued a report maintaining a hold rating and set a price target of $18. I would be pleased to see that price. 


1 Year Chart: Bear Market trend


Current Position: 45 shares


Maximum Position: 100 shares


Average Cost Per Share: $14.69


Dividend: Quarterly at $.12 per share


Dividend Yield at Average Total Cost: 3.27


Last Ex Dividend: 12/13/18 


Last DiscussedItem # 3.B. Bought 25 FHN at $15.56-Used Commission Free Trade (11/4/18 Post) 


I discussed the third quarter's earning report in that post and have nothing to add. 


B. Bought 10 HOPE at $13.49 and 10 at $11.69-Used Commission Free Trades






Quote:  Hope Bancorp Inc. Stock Quote


Closing Price Last Friday: HOPE $12.46 +$0.19 +1.55% 


HOPE SEC Filings


HOPE Consensus Analyst E.P.S. Estimates (as of 12/10/18):

2018: $1.46
2019: $1.47
P/E at $13.49 Market Price Using the Consensus 2019: 9.18

Consensus E.P.S. Estimates as of 12/26:

2018: $1.45
2019: $1.47
P/E at $11.69 Using 2019 E.P.S. = 7.95

HOPE 1 Year Chart: Bear Market trend


As with other major beneficiaries of the reduced federal corporate income rate, HOPE will lose the Y-O-Y boost to earnings in 2019 compared to 2018 over 2017. The bank will need to do better than the estimated 2019 $.01 increase in E.P.S. Y-O-Y. 


Maximum Position: 130 Shares in this Account + shares purchased with dividends (20 shares remaining, raised from 120 share limit due to price decline, valuation and dividend yield) 


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule. 


Average Cost Per Share This Account: $16.13


Highest Cost Lot in Current Chain: 30 shares at $17.65 (will be sold when and if there is a profit to be harvested)


Dividend: Quarterly at $.14  ($.56 per share annually) 


Last Ex Dividend Date: 10/25/18 


Dividend Yield at Average TC Per Share = 3.47%


Dividend Reinvestment: Yes 


Last Sell DiscussionsItem #3.C. SOLD 20 HOPE at $17.91-Used Commission free trade  (8/26/18 Post)Item 1.A. Sold  50 HOPE at $19 (11/4/17 Post)


Last Substantive Buy DiscussionItem # 3.A.Bought 10 HOPE at $14.7 and 10 at $14-Used Commission Free Trades (11/7/18 Post)



I discussed the third quarter earnings report in that post and have nothing to add. 

2. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Strategy

Purchases: $4K

A. Bought  1 Northern States Power 2.2% First Mortgage Bond Maturing on 8/15/20


I now own 2 bonds. 

Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus not linked)


Definitive Prospectus Supplement


Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. who does not guarantee the notes


Security: First Lien on substantially all assets 


Credit Ratings:




Bought at a Total Cost of 98.632

YTM at TC Then at 3.054%
Current Yield at TC = 2.23%

B. Bought 1 Treasury .75% Coupon Maturing on 7/15/19

YTM = 2.539%


I now own 2 bonds. 

This is a filler in my short term ladder.


C. Bought 1 Wisconsin Energy 2.45% SU Maturing on 6/15/20:




I now own 3 bonds. 


FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Issuer: The issuer's new name is WEC Energy Group Inc.  (WEC).

WEC Analyst Estimates

WEC Energy Group posts third-quarter results


Credit Ratings:




Bought at a Total Cost of 98.763

YTM at Total Cost Then at 3.31%
Current Yield at TC = 2.4807%

D.  Bought 1 McDonalds 2.2% SU Maturing on 5/26/20-In A Roth Account




I now own 4 bonds with the other 3 held in taxable accounts. 


Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Issuer: McDonald's Corp.  (MCD)

MCD Analyst Estimates
McDonald's Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results

Credit Ratings:




Bought at Total Cost of 98.794

YTM at TC then at 3.067%
Current Yield at TC =  2.2269%

3. Added to the Stock CEF BIF-Bought 20 BIF at $10.55 and 30 at $10.18-Used Commission Free Trades:




Quote: Boulder Growth & Income Fund  (BIF)


Holdings


BIF SEC Filings


Current Position: 150 Shares


Maximum Position: 300 Shares


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule


Average Total Cost Per Share: $10.59 


Data Date of  20 Share Purchase: 12/10/18

Net Asset Value Per Share: $12.69
Market Price: $10.53
Discount: -17.02%

Data Date of 30 Share Purchase: 1/4/19

Net Asset Value Per Share = $12.36
Market Price: $10.23 
Discount: -17.23%

Sourced: Boulder Growth & Income, closed-end fund summary-CEF Connect


Dividends: Quarterly at $.102 per share (recently revised from monthly payments)


Next Ex Dividend Date: 1/23/19 


Dividend Reinvestment: Yes at greater than a 10% discount to net asset value per share


Last Sell DiscussionItem # 3.B. Eliminated BIF: Sold 116+ (2/16/17 Post) 


Last DiscussedItem # 3 Bought 100 BIF at $10.73 (11/25/18 POST) 

I have nothing to add to that recent post. 

4. Added 50 MSPRA at $18.89 ($1 IB Commission)




Quote: Morgan Stanley Non-Cumulative Series A Preferred Stock 


Closing Price Last Friday: MS-PA $19.47 +$0.21 +1.09% 


Issuer: Morgan Stanley (MS) 

MS Analyst Estimates 
MS-PA One Year Chart: Bear Trend, possible bottom in $18.5 to $19 range.

This is an average down from a recent purchase: Item # 2.A. Bought 50 MSPRA at $20.7 (12/2/18 Post) 


MSPRA is an equity preferred stock that pays non-cumulative and qualified dividends at the greater of 4% or .7% above the 3 month Libor rate on a $25 par value. Prospectus 


Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity Preferred Floating Rate Securities

The dividends are qualified and non-cumulative.  

This kind of security would become worthless in a bankruptcy.  


I would anticipate that this security will decline in price when alternative fixed coupon preferred stocks are falling in price and increasing in yield up to the point when the rise in short term interest rates triggers and increase in the coupon rate with an expectation of further increases.  

This kind of security provides some problematic inflation protection coupled in the same security with some deflation/low intermediate term interest rate protection.   

Chart3-Month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) 


Starting Point: January 1986
Maximum and Current Position: 100 shares

Average Cost per share = $19.81


Trading Profits to date = $2,121.95


5. Income Generation Aegon Hybrids


A. Bought 50 AEB at $19.31  ($1 IB Commission)




Quote:  AEGON N.V.  Floating Perpetual Capital Stock (AEB)


Closing Price Last Friday: AEB $20.43 +$0.73 +3.71% 


My CategoryAdvantages and Disadvantages of Equity Preferred Floating Rate Securities


Security DescriptionAEB is a hybrid security that pays quarterly "dividends" for a U.S. taxpayer at the greater of 4% or .875% above the 3 month Libor rate on a $25 par value. 

3-Month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) Chart-St. Louis Fed 


The minimum rate of 4% has been the applicable coupon since I first bought this security in 2008. 


This unusual security is a junior bond on the balance sheet and in effect an equity preferred stock for regulatory capital purposes. 

AEB's potential perpetual character makes it analogous to U.S. equity preferred stocks, but it is superior in Aegon's capital structure to equity preferred stocks. 


The hybrids rank below all senior debt. Distributions have been treated as qualified dividends for U.S. taxpayers in the past, but would be classified as interest in European countries. Quantumonline still shows the qualified rate as still being applicable for U.S. taxpayers. 


Aegon may call this security at anytime now. The optional redemption would be at the $25 par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends. 


Prospectus 


Alternate to Libor: The Libor rates will end in 2021.  The scandal-hit libor rate used to set mortgages will end in 2021




It is unclear to me at this time whether the alternate rate will work or produce a similar result to the Libor rate setting. I seriously doubt that I will own this security for very long, as shown by my trading history.  

 
Prior Trade Discussions


Item # 2 Sold 50 AEB at $25.23 (9/7/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $166.46)-Bought at $21.9 and discussed here 


Item # 4 Sold 50 AEB at $21.28 (5/3/14 Post)(profit snapshot = $49.98


Item # 2 Sold 100 AEB at $18.42 (10/4/11 Post)(profit snapshot = $1,142.51)


Item # 3 Sold 100 AEB at $18.2635 ROTH IRA-Average Total Cost $6.05 (9/19/11 Post)(profit Snapshot = $1,213.76) 


Item # 4  Sold 50 AEB at $21.69 (10/11/2010 Post)(profit snapshot = $81.11)-Item # 3 Bought 50 AEB at $19.74 in Regular IRA (8/20/2010 Post) 


Item # 2 SOLD 100 of 300 AEB at 19.72 (8/16/2010 Post)(profit snapshot 150 Shares at $772.04


Buy of 50 AEB at $4.8 (2/23/2009) 


Buy of 50 $5.5 (10/8/2008 Post) 


Realized Gains to Date: $3,425.86  


DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

21 comments:

  1. Macskill -

    ""Now they'll tell you, if it's just the two of you, 'The guy is nuts, he doesn't have a grasp of the issues, he's making rash decisions, he's not listening to people who know the subject matter,' " she said. "But in public if they go after him ... they know they get a primary, and they know that's tough.""

    IF they'd only ban together and TELL the base their observations -- no one would get primaried and we'd be back to normal again. Or starting down that road.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T: Donald will be the republican nominee in 2020 provided he is healthy IMO. His approval rating among republicans is close to 90%, with about 2/3rds of republicans viewing him as both honest and a good role model for their children.

      Trump is the republican party.

      ++++

      I deleted the two charts in this post showing real GDP growth rates over different time periods and replaced them with new snapshots. In the prior snapshots, I did not move the right cursor all the way to the right which had the effect of leaving off the most recent quarters.

      In the longer term GDP growth rate by quarter chart, note that the recessions occurred more frequently between 1948 and 1982 compared to 1982 to the present. The economic expansion cycles have become more elongated with slower GDP growth rates than after WWII.

      I suspect that the slower growth rates prolong the economic expansions and create more stability in the economy.

      The post WWII growth rates will never be achieved again in the U.S. There are several reasons. Prior to the end of WWII, there was a long period where consumer demand was suppressed by the Great Depression and that demand was unleashed after WWII.

      Importantly, as the U.S. economy grew in the post WWII period through the Vietnam War, the law of large numbers made it more difficult to produce annual growth rates in excess of 3% with 2.5% now being the new normal long term average annual number. Even annual $1 trillion federal government budget deficits barely moves the needle.

      Other reasons for slower growth rates are discussed in this book:

      "The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World Book 70)"

      https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071W7JCKW/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

      Lastly, I suspect that more future recessions will be caused by financial stresses related to excessive debt than in the past. Those recessions generally have slower and longer recovery periods than a garden variety U.S. recession, which was the norm after WWII and prior to the recent Near Depression:

      Reinhart and Rogoff: "Recessions and Recoveries"
      http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/rogoff/files/aer_104-5_50-55.pdf

      Delete
  2. """Those recessions generally have slower and longer recovery periods than a garden variety U.S. recession, """

    Any sense of how much longer and slower?

    """ His approval rating among republicans is close to 90%"""

    The polls aren't accurate. The membership affiliation as Rep has gone down. The polls are asking those still affiliated. It's odd how this factor doesn't get media coverage. Got enough to spot it 1-2xs but that was all. The polling sites don't talk about it, either to show it's a non-issue nor to indicate they're adjusting for it.

    House hearings will be public. Nixon was well liked until the hearings.

    Interesting that economy has less recessions now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T: My best "guess" now is that a recession will likely happen within 12 to 24 months, but that estimate can move up in time based on significant adverse developments (or lengthen in time based on major positive events).

      The most important possible negative event, which may occur within 3 months, is an acceleration of the trade war with China, possibly aggravated by worsening trade relations with one or more major trading partners.

      It is possible that a prolonged government shutdown could be a factor since government spending is now and has been a major boost to GDP growth which is already slowing. Then there are hundreds of thousands of government employees who will not be receiving paychecks for as long as the partial shutdown continues, plus there will be major disruptions in government services including those provided by the IRS (e.g. tax refunds)

      I do not foresee interest rates and inflation being a contributing cause during 2019.

      The rise in interest rates so far will have no material negative impact on the real economy IMO and may curtail to a limited decree the massive misallocation of capital caused by extremely abnormal central bank monetary policies in effect for a decade.

      The higher interest rates on savings accounts, CDs, MM funds and other short term instruments will generate more disposable income for households that can be spent without adding to debt levels. Over $10 trillion in U.S. household savings are in those low interest bearing and relatively safe instruments.

      U.S. interest rates are still stimulative in my view, but one's perspective would have to be extended to the broader sweep of history rather than just the last ten years which has led some to believe that abnormally low rates are high.

      Garden variety recessions can be caused by consumers becoming so satiated with stuff, financed in many cases by more debt, that demand falls which results in lower production and employment. Banks respond by tightening credit which results in more failed businesses and so on. Those causes still exist and will reemerge.

      The main question is what can make a recession worse than a short, relatively quick recession where there is a strong snapback led in the past by new housing construction (except for the last one) and auto sales. My answer would be excessive debt including particularly vast amounts of debt incurred that have not and will not produce benefits in the real economy. The issue is whether the next debt bomb explosion will be far worse than the last one in 2008.

      ++

      Yes, some republicans have left their party to become independents. The GOP under Trump has lost some of their thinkers like George Will and college educated women have turned against them in large numbers.

      You may be from a blue state. In Tennessee, Donald would win today by about 58% against most of the Democrat possibles with the possible exception of Joe Biden who would still lose, though by a lesser amount.

      I do not see a significant erosion in the GOP's base which includes evangelicals, non-college educated caucasians, white men, and reactionaries who prefer the false label of conservatives.

      If the economy is fine in November 2020, with widely viewed successes in restricting illegal immigration and in reaching trade deals in his pocket, Donald will probably win re-election unless there is clear and convincing evidence that he has committed a variety of criminal offenses. Even then, I doubt that most of his base would abandon him. He is by far the most effective demagogue in American political history and easily the most authoritarian minded President as well.

      Trump's chances for reelection improve with a Democrat nominee who is widely viewed as too liberal by independents and moderates (e.g. Bernie, Warren).

      The last Gallup weekly polls has his approval rating at 89% among republicans and 39% among independents.

      https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

      Delete
    2. Hello South Gent,

      I wanted to get your take on quantitative tightening which I'm a little confused about. Do you think it has a significant impact on lowering equity prices. It seems as though there is a lot of controversy about whether or not this changes the money supply or whether it is up significant enough amount to actually impact bond selling. Also, I have read instances where a lot of so-called BBB investment-grade companies will be rated as junk when there and bonds become due.

      I don't know whether the lowering of the 10 year end of the bond interest rate spectrum has any effect, but my main question is how do you think quantitative tightening actually affect equity values?

      Thank you

      Delete
    3. G: I would not call what the FED is doing as "quantitative tightening". I would label it as removing slightly and slowly a decade long extremely easy monetary policy. The pundits who believe that a 2.25% FF rate is harmful to the real economy will generally refer to the current FED policy as tightening.

      The FED's balance sheet remains bloated after it quit reinvesting the proceeds. As of 1/2/19, the FED owns 3.839+ trillion in treasuries and mortgage backed securities:

      https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/soma/sysopen_accholdings.html

      I regard the FED's monetary policy as still being accommodative and stimulative to the real economy.

      IMO, the problem is not liquidity but how the liquidity generated by the central banks was used over the past decade.

      Chart M2 Money Stock:
      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2

      Chart Velocity of M2:
      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V/

      https://thistimeitisdifferent.com/us-money-velocity-may-2018

      Delete
  3. One article:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/12/11/a-lot-of-americans-spent-2017-bailing-on-the-republican-party/?utm_term=.a1b7995c601c

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for all those insights. They make sense to me.

    Compared to post-WWII, these recessions have been shorter (with 6mos-2years)... What would longer look like?

    The plus is with a recession, people will vote with less risk, for someone with actual experience. A known quality, well I think they would.

    He won by 100,000 votes in 3 states. Without that, he'd have lost. Those states are polling differently now. So there is more possibility. I traveled out of state to one to canvas. I had a couple lifetime GOPs anxious to tell me they were voting DNC to send a message. Not all GOP, but different mood than in 2016. It was for a very moderate middle of road candidate, not a "progressive."

    His base isn't going anywhere. Not without as you said, clear overwhelming evidence. They are sold on him. And all his excuses.

    The risk is that Russia manages to interfere enough, or there's enough voter suppression...

    The DNC party too went too far over. Even my progressive sister is saying she's an independent. I'm not sure what intersectionality means in most of ways it's used. It's like a cool word to put into a sentence, that excludes if you don't agree, but on what?

    But the moderates are coming to life, and just plain fed up with all the blubber. There's a lot of talk about "stop using litmus tests." So we'll have to see what the DNC does about shooting itself in it's foot or picking someone realistic.

    At least they've gotten past talking exclusively about Clinton, Biden, and Bernie. A year ago, you'd think there was no one else in the party (or outside it).

    Futures up. Wonder what they'll be tomorrow.

    Chase here or be confident there'll be more worries and a retest of those lows... But if it retests by then it will be hard to know if it will bounce back afterward...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T: In the Reinhart and Rogoff article, their study of the historical record going back 100 years showed that it took about 8 years to reach pre-banking crisis levels of income.

      A recession that morphs into a banking and financial crisis undermines the pillars of the economy. Credit is tightened or withdrawn altogether. The oxygen is taken out of the room. Since the Near Depression, the debt bomb has grown in size tremendously.

      NBER dates U.S. recessions.
      https://www.nber.org/cycles.html

      The Great Depression is broken up into recession and expansion cycles, but most Americans would have view the entire period between October 1929 and WWII as a terrible recession. There was an expansion cycle between April 1933 and April 1937 where the economy did grow, responding to fiscal stimulus from the federal government under FDR's leadership and the first QE implementation by the FED. The growth was off cratered levels however. The recession resumed in 1937 after the FED tightened and fiscal stimulus was withdrawn and some fiscal drag was added by the social security tax being withheld from paychecks for the first time. For most households, the recession lasted about 12 years. The stock market recovered to pre-October 1929 levels after the Korean War in 1954 using the DJIA.

      Uncheck inflation adjusted box:
      https://www.macrotrends.net/1319/dow-jones-100-year-historical-chart

      Delete
  5. South Gent,

    High yielding stocks such as BDC's, REIT's and MLP's are all testing their 2016 low.

    Sectors are rotating. Regional Banking KRE price closed at $45.84 in 2018. Bu it might test 2016 low of $32.63 this year because the current market sentiment and the overall investing environment are worse than those of 2016.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: The decline in regional bank and BDC stocks last quarter was generated in large part to concerns about a U.S. recession. Both sectors are very sensitive to U.S. credit conditions including default rates.

      BDCs with a substantial exposure to floating rate loans will also be negatively impacted by stagnation in short term rates. Their net investment income has been receiving a lift after their loan rates cleared their Libor floors and started to increase at 1 or 3 month Libor spreads to a fixed rate.

      Delete
  6. South Gent,

    My hypothesis is that the sector economics has not changed much from 2016 but the current macro environment (rate hikes, trade war, the possibility of a recession, and government shutdown ...etc.) is much worse than that of 2016. As such these sectors will test their 2016 lows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: Regional bank stocks have a long history of cratering. I do not view them as buy and forget stocks. I have a long history in trading them which is what I am doing now.

      I noted in my Gateway Post on this sector that "the banks have blown themselves up on three separate occasions" since I started to invest as an adult.

      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2011/10/regional-bank-basket-strategy-gateway.html

      The regional banks are generally major beneficiaries of the corporate tax reduction with some exceptions. Many of them saw their state and federal income burden fall from over 35% of income to under 25%. There has also been some relaxation in regulations. So there are positives now compared to 2016 as well.

      I am far more hyper in trading BDCs and view that sector unfavorably. The trading goal is always to escape with a share profit of any size after collecting several dividend payments. It remains to be seen whether my small ball buying during the last quarter will result in a realization of that goal. There are 3 BDCs bought during the 2018 4th quarter where I can now profitably exit but most are still in the red. One of those is Alcentra Capital Corp. (ABDC) where both of my open market purchases are profitable:

      Alcentra Capital Corp.
      $6.92 +0.04 + 0.58%
      Last Updated: Jan 7, 2019 1:20 p.m. EST
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/abdc

      The BDCs are generally performing well today:

      VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF
      $15.27 +$0.45 +3.04%
      Last Updated: Jan 7, 2019 1:39 p.m. EST
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/bizd

      That sector will almost invariably have more drama than a broad market index ETF.

      Morningstar calculates the 3 year standard deviation for BIZD at 13.04:

      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/ratings-risk.action?t=BIZD&region=usa&culture=en-US

      BND is at 2.98:

      http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/ratings-risk.action?t=BND

      Delete
  7. There was a significant decline in the 3 month treasury bill auction investment rate today compared to last week.

    Today's auction produced an investment rate of 2.458% compared to last week's 2.515%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi SG, perhaps you could explain why if the economy is doing pretty well so far , why the 10 year bond is at only 2.66 and not atleast 3. If the Fed has 2 rate raises as thought by Brian Westbury in the Employment Summary above, the yield curve really inverts.

      thanks

      Delete
    2. G: One of the main restraints on U.S. intermediate and long term treasury yields is the abnormally low yields provided by other sovereign bonds.

      The ten year U.S. treasury yield looks really juicy compared to the 10 year bonds issued by Germany, France, Japan, the Netherlands, and Switzerland and significantly better than most other similarly rated sovereign bonds.

      Even the 10 year bonds issued by Portugal and Spain are at 1.81% and 1.5% respectively. The ECB and other European central banks still have negative benchmark rates.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds

      The Bond Ghouls are not on the same future forecast page as the Stock Jocks, the FED and most economists including the perpetually optimistic ones like Brian Wesbury.

      The yield curve suggests a recession within 12 to 24 months.

      The current forecast, using the CME FED Watch tool, is for no increases in the FF rate this year.

      A decrease from the current range of 2.25% to 2.5% is viewed as more likely than a single increase.

      The two year treasury note has retreated in yield to 2.53% from a high of 2.84% on 11/26/18 and is currently below the 1 year treasury bill yield of 2.57%:

      https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2019

      If the Bond Ghouls thought there was going to be a .25% this year, I doubt that the yield inversion in the 1 year T Bill and 2 year treasury note would have already happened.

      The 1 year T Bill also provides a higher yield now than the 3 and 5 year treasury notes which confirms that view IMO.

      If the FED hiked twice this year, there would be an inversion in the 2/10 year treasury yields which have come close to an inversion already. Generally, over the past several weeks, that spread has been in a range between 11 and 20 basis points.

      I am somewhere in the middle. I am expecting one .25 rate hike, probably in the first half at the June meeting and then a .25% decrease in the 2020 first half, probably in the first quarter.

      It is possible, though not likely IMO, that there will be 2 increases. That will depend IMO on the economy continuing its modest growth, with real GDP growth trending at a 2.5% annual rate, continued job and wage gains and probably a favorable resolution to the U.S. of the trade war with China within the next 90 days. The government shutdown could contribute to an earlier than anticipated recession if it drags on too long.

      Delete
  8. Sg the jury is still out re vix TE. BUT it looks like the recession will be mild and short lived if the stock drop is barely a bear 20% drop. Any thoughts. . Also thanks for above explanation !

    GAstroj

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. S: If there is a recession starting next year, I seriously doubt that the low will hold from the December selloff. It may actually take data supporting that characterization of the economy rather than merely a fear of it happening which is what we have now.

      The question and potential really serious problem with any world wide recession now is whether it can become a financial crisis due to excessive debt and leverage. That remains to be seen but that threat will be with us for the remainder of our lives and will become a greater risk with more profound consequences with the passage of time.

      I have not restarted the day count for the TE. It looks likely that one will be avoided for now but the two volatility events last year, both of which were near TEs using my model tailored to historical evidence, is nonetheless worrisome in that it suggests that the next one or the one thereafter will be the big bang provided they occur within the next 24 months or so.

      Delete
    2. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4232134-fed-just-end-bear-market

      Hi SG
      this article actually scares me. It seems like if true, the Fed is back to its boom bust cycles, unless its just to hype psychology ; maybe China is good news, but it seems to me that the Chinese mandate is to be a dominant world power, so any compromise now seems suspect, for the long run.

      Do you think This actually raises the stakes for a collapse of leverage in the US.

      Any thoughts , thanks

      Delete
    3. G: I do not assign the FED with the motives as that author.

      I did not see anything different in Powell's comments.

      He basically said that the FED will respond to economic conditions as they develop.

      There would be one set of policy tools deployed, for example, during the next recession, while continued economic growth would result in a continued drawdown of its balance sheet and a "patient" rise in the FF rate to a level below the historical average for an expansion cycle unless inflation heats up.

      Delete
  9. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/01/observations-and-sample-of-recent_9.html

    ReplyDelete