Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: IRT, MSPRA, PWCDF,

Economy

Morgan Stanley says economy on 'recession watch' amid bond warning
Falling interest rates are sending a warning signal to the stock market: CNBC 


I would say that the Bond Ghouls are becoming more confident in their recession prediction based on both treasury yields and the yield curve. 



Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates


Probabilities on or before January 2020 Meeting
Countdown to FOMC: CME FedWatch Tool

The Stock Jocks are either not buying into that recession prediction or are arguing that stocks can rise for several months based on what happened in several prior yield inversions'No way' we're headed for recession—experts talk bond market warning The Stock Jocks are expressing less confidence in their nothing but blue skies ahead scenario however.  


In a joint news conference with Japan's Prime Minister last Sunday, Donald claimed that the U.S. "will have a deal with China sometime into the future". 

Why? 

Trump: “I don’t believe that China can continue to pay these really hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs.” (emphasis added) Trump says ‘not bothered’ by N. Korea missile test, upbeat on China trade deal - MarketWatch There are two false statements in that last quote which is  scary on this topic. 

The first false statement is his claim that China pays the U.S. tariffs and the second one is that the U.S. tariffs paid by China are in the "hundreds of billions". Donald has made as many as four false statements in a tweet. Two false statements from the Extremely Stable Genius in one sentence is just normal. He is just trying to get his daily average above 30. 


Trump also said that the U.S. was "not ready to make a deal" and U.S. tariffs on China's exports "could go up very, very substantially, very easily". U.S. `Not Ready' to Make a Trade Deal With China, Trump Says - Bloomberg


While is not unusual for the Extremely Stable Genius to contradict himself before finishing a sentence, the statements above are not contradictory in claiming there will be a trade deal and the U.S. is not ready to make a deal. 


Donald the Great is basically saying that China has no choice but to kneel before him; and consequently there will be a trade deal on Donald's terms. China's President will soon be crawling to Donald, wearing a Make America Great Again hat, while alternatively singing odes to Donald and God Bless America.  


In Donald's mind, China will bend to his will, just keeping twisting harder and harder until China squeals like a stuck pig or as Donald would if he had been sent to Vietnam for jungle combat during that war. His patriotic service during that war was avoiding venereal disease in the NYC party scene.  


China is digging in its heels on protecting a state-run economy


China ready to hit back at U.S. with rare earths: newspapers - Reuters

Poof! Trump investment boom is gone - MarketWatch I would not call the increase starting with Trump's inauguration a "Trump bump" but simply a continuation of the trajectory that was under way during the last months of the Obama administration, as shown in the chart reproduced in that article.  

+++++++

Markets and Market Commentary


Ned Davis Research claims that the S & P 500 would now be 19% lower without share buybacks that have occurred between 2011 and the 2019 first quarter. The stock market would be much lower if it weren't for companies buying back their own shares While that is a relevant consideration, the most critical issue is whether companies are spending enough free cash flow to generate future earnings growth. The other two issues are whether the company is using debt to buy back stock and the P/E multiples paid for the shares. It is not difficult to rattle off a bunch of companies who wasted shareholder money buying back shares.  

Why one stock-market bull thinks investors are overreacting to trade-war rhetoric - MarketWatch

Investors and voters will continually be drenched daily in Trump's B.S.: Trump claims stock market would be 10,000 points higher if Fed didn't raise interest rates 

+++++

Trump

Trump tries to steer border wall deal to GOP Donor firm - The Washington Post ("President Trump has personally and repeatedly urged the head of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to award a border wall contract to a North Dakota construction firm whose top executive is a GOP donor and frequent guest on Fox News, according to four administration officials.") 


Donald, I have a question. When will you start draining the D.C. swamp? 

Faked Pelosi videos, slowed to make her appear drunk, spread across social media The Trumpsters specialize in spreading Fake News. That is their main forte. The Russians can learn a lot from them. Showboat Rudi and Demagogue Don retweeted the altered Pelosi video. 

It is not surprising that the Fake News President retweeted the doctored Pelosi video and then claimed that he knew nothing about it.  



Trump denies knowledge of fake videos-TheHill

In latest attack, Trump tweets edited video of Pelosi tripping over words


Trump and His Supporters Are Hyping a Doctored Video of Nancy Pelosi Appearing Drunk – VICE


Facebook refuses to delete fake Pelosi video spread by Trump supporters (if the fake Pelosi video was deleted, that would indicate in TrumpWorld that social media giants were trying to stifle "conservative" speech); Facebook won't block faked Pelosi video-The Washington Post  

The Fake News President could give lessons to Vlad and like minded authoritarians about how to create a society where true is false and false is true. The U.S. already has one foot in that world, as the Fake News President, his True Believers and media apparatchiks move the nation deeper into a Fact Free Zone.  

Trump HUD Official, Lynne Patton, Says She Doesn't Care If She Broke the Law Ms. Patton, a former Trump party planner, was handpicked by Donald to lead HUD's operations in NY and NJ. Lynne Patton - Wikipedia


Everyone knows that Donald The Magnificent hires only the best people for high level posts in his administration. Donald himself has instructed us many time on that point.


"Everyone knows" is one of Our Great Leader's favorite sayings, which normally precedes a demonstrably false representation made by the Duck. All of the things that ‘everybody knows,’ according to Trump - The Washington Post  


Of course, everyone knows excludes the dwindling number of Americans who still view truth and facts as important and do not view a constant stream of reality creations by a U.S. President as entertaining. 


"Conservatives" call those people Liptards or, when in a more charitable frame of mind, Losers. Those misguided individuals, who assert that Ms. Patton has no qualifications for her office, are just in need of some reindoctrination by Trump's party (e.g. 2 + 2 = 5 if Trump's party says so; George Orwell - 1984 - Part 3, Chapter 2

I hereby nominate Congresswoman Liz Cheney, a chip off the old block, to lead that re-education effort. Her dad is the quintessential chickenhawk (5 deferments during the Vietnam War-How Dick Cheney dodged the draft.)
+++++

1. Bought Back 100 PWCDF at U.S.$20.83:


History this Account:




Quotes:


USD Priced Shares (pink sheet exchange): Power Corp. of Canada (PWCDF)


CAD Priced Shares (Toronto exchange): Power Corp. of Canada Stock Quote (Canada: Toronto)


Closing Price Yesterday: PWCDF $21.28 -$0.25 -1.18% 


I last sold PWCDF at $23.41 (3/21/19) and received the 2019 first quarter dividend. Item # 1.A. Sold 100 PWCDF at $23.41 (4/7/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $41.1)


With this re-entry purchase, I will receive the second quarter dividend and have established a significantly lower average cost per share compared to the 100 share lot sold last March. Item # 2 Added 50 PWCDF at $22.58  (7/5/18 Post)Item # 2 Bought 50 PWCDF at $23.31 (5/31/18)


The foregoing is viewed as a victory when playing small ball. 


I thought that the stock price would decline after completion of Power Corporation's modified Dutch tender offer. Power Corporation of Canada | March 8, 2019 - Power Corporation Announces Terms of its Substantial Issuer Bid to Repurchase up to $1.35 billion of its Subordinate Voting Shares (3/8/19 Press Release) 


The final result was announced on 4/17/19. The company purchased and cancelled  40,909,041 shares at a purchase price of C$33 per share. Power Corporation of Canada | April 17, 2019 - Power Corporation Announces Final Results of Substantial Issuer Bid 

This buyback bid was funded by Power Corporation selling Power Financial shares back to that company in response to its dutch tender offer. 


The Power Financial tender offer was financed by the tender offer made by its subsidiary Great-West Lifeco for its share. Great-West Lifeco announces final results of substantial issuer bid 

This train of events started with Great-West selling substantially all of its U.S. individual life and annuity business. All of these corporations are connected through share ownership: 



Power Corporation of Canada | Organization Chart


Another decline started with the first quarter earnings report released on 5/14/19. 


I pared my position in Power Financial by selling my highest cost 50 share lot. Item # 2.A. Sold 50 PWF:CA at C$30.99 (3/31/19 Post)-Item # 4.A. Bought 50 PWF:CA at C$27.73 (12/23/18 Post) I kept the lowest cost lot bought at C$25.5: Item  #5.A. Bought 50 PWF:CA at C$25.5 (1/23/2019 Post)


Last Power Corporation Ex Dividend Date: 3/7/19


Next Ex Dividend Date: 6/6/19


Dividend: Quarterly at C$.405 (C$1.62 annually), increased by 6% effective for the current quarter.  


When held in a U.S. citizens taxable account, a 15% Canadian withholding tax will be withheld. The Canadian dollar amount will be converted into USDs for the PWCDF owners. The dividend yield will depend on the conversion rate. A rise in the CAD's value against the USD after purchase has the effect of a dividend increase while a loss in value operates as a dividend cut. 


If I calculate the dividend yield using the 5/18/19 closing price in Toronto (C$28.03), the dividend yield would be 5.78%. 


Last Earnings Report




Power Corporation of Canada | May 14, 2019 - Power Corporation Reports First Quarter 2019 Financial Results and Dividend Increase - Press Releases


I would not pay much attention to the Y-O-Y profit decline realized by Sagard Investments and other investment subsidiaries. The far higher profit in the 2018 first quarter resulted from Sagard Europe selling some investments.


The negative reaction by investors to this profit report is probably due to the Power Financial profit decline. Power Financial Corporation | May 13, 2019-Power Financial Reports First Quarter 2019 Financial Results


Prior Discussions:


Item # 4.A. Sold 100 PWCDF at $23.56 (7/22/17)-Item # 3.A. Bought 100 PWDCF at $22.14 (5/28/17 Post) 



Item # 1. Sold 400 POW:TO at C$31.05: Update For Portfolio Positioning And Management As Of 4/29/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha (USD Profit = $360.45)
Trading Profits to Date All Accounts: $1,129.14  

2. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:


June 2019 Maturities:

SU = Senior Unsecured Bond ($1K par value per bond)

CD = Certificate of Deposit ($1K par value per CD)-FDIC Insured
MI = Monthly Interest Payments
Treasury: U.S. Treasury Debt ($1K par value per bill, note or bond)
IR = Investment Rate for Treasury Bills Bought at Auction

2 Time Warner 2.1% SU 6/1 (bought in January 2018)

2 Ryder Systems 2.55% SU 6/1 (bought March 2018)
2 Oncor 2.15% SU 6/1 (bought in June 2018)
2 Treasury 2.429% IR 56 day bill 6/4 (bought at auction)
3 Treasury  2.562%% IR 6 Month T Bills 6/6 (bought at auction)
2 Citigroup 2.05% SU 6/7 (bought12/17 and 1/18)
2 Mylan 2.5% SU 6/7 (bought April 2018)
1 Caterpillar 2.1% SU 6/9 (bought July 2018)
5 Treasury 2.429%%IR 28 Day Bill 6/11 (bought at auction)
3 Treasury 2.424% IR 56 Day 6/11 (bought at auction)
2 Guaranty Trust 1.6% CDs MI 6/13 (21 Month CDs)
3 Treasury 2.546% IR 6 Month T Bills 6/13/18
2 Cardinal Health 1.948% 6/14 (bought December 2017) 
2 Bank of Nova Scotia 1.65% SU 6/14 (bought December 2017)
1 Treasury .875% 6/15 (secondary market)
4 Emera 2.15% SU 6/15 (bought 1/18 & 7/18)
3 Treasury 56 day bills  2.429% IR (bought at auction)
3 Treasury  2.552%  IR 6 Month T Bill 6/20 (bought at auction)
2 Wells Fargo 1.85% CDs MI 6/24 (18 month CDs)
2 Target 2.3% SU 6/26 (bought July 2018)
2 Sonabank 2.3% CDs MI 6/28  (1 Year CDs)
3 Treasury 1.625% 6/30/19 (secondary market purchases)

$53K in maturities


$8K in adds:

A.  Bought 3 New York Community Bank 2.45% CDs Maturing on 5/22/19:



B. Bought 2 East West 2.4% CDs Maturing on 2/22/20:


Issuer: Operating bank of East West Bancorp Inc.
EWBC Analyst Estimates

C. Bought 2 Live Oak 2.4% CDs (monthly interest payments) Maturing on 5/29/20:




Issuer: Operating bank of Live Oak Bancshares Inc. (LOB)

LOB Analyst Estimates

D. Bought 1 Treasury 1.375% Coupon Maturing on 2/15/20:

YTM = 2.37%



I now own 2 bonds.


The CDs mentioned above have a slightly better yield. The state income tax issue does not exist for me. If a state did tax the CD interest, the after tax yield would be less than the treasury yield when held in a non-retirement account. For example, a 5% state tax on the 2.4% CD interest payment would reduce the after tax yield to 2.28%, making the lower yielding treasury maturing on 2/15/20 a better after tax option than the East West CD.


3. Pares and Eliminations:


A. Pared IRT- Sold 127 IRT Shares at $10.52-Used Commission Free Trade:




Profit Snapshot: +$362.17




Closing Price Yesterday: IRT $10.96 -$0.08 -0.72% 


It looks like I turned the dividend reinvestment option on and off several times and may have sold some higher cost lots previously. IRT was paying monthly dividends until it switched recently to quarterly distributions.

Quote: Independence Realty Trust Inc. (IRT)

SEC Filings
IRT Apartment Map
2018 Annual Report
10-Q for the Q/E 3/31/19

Property Portfolio as of 3/31/19:




Dividends: Quarterly at $.18 ($.72 annually)


Dividend History


Last Ex Dividend Date: 3/28/19


This transaction eliminates my IRT position held in the Fidelity taxable account.


I still own lower cost shares in my Schwab and IB accounts


Remaining Positions:


Schwab Account: 121+ Shares with an average cost per share of $7.36

Yield at Average Cost = 9.78%

Interactive Brokers ("IB"): 150 Shares with an average cost per share of $6.51

Yield at Average Cost = 11.06%

I have quit reinvesting the dividends based on valuation which I regard as high for this REIT. I do not reinvest the dividend for positions held in the IB account. 


Last Purchase DiscussionsItem # 1.A. Added 50 IRT at $9.35-Roth IRA Account (1/21/18 Post)Item # 1 Bought 50 IRT at $6.18 Update For The Equity REIT Basket Strategy As Of 2/22/16 - South Gent | Seeking AlphaItem # 2 Added 100 IRT at $6.8 Update For EQUITY REIT Basket Strategy As Of 1/29/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


Last Sell DiscussionsItem # 1.A. Sold 57+ IRT at $10.27 in a Roth IRA Account  and Item #1 B. Sold 50 IRT at $10.38-Used Commission Free Trade (9/26/18 Post)
(profit snapshots =$328.25)Item 1.C. Sold 50 IRT at $10.09 (6/21/18 Post)Items 1, 2, 3 Update For Equity REIT Basket Strategy As Of 7/28/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


IRT Trading Profits to Date: $1,138.32 (+$776.15 in prior trades)


Investment CategoryEquity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy (contains trade snapshots)


Last Earnings Report: Q/E 3/31/19


This report contains the same problems that I have noted in the past including stagnant FFO, inadequate dividend coverage, and IRT's failure to report AFFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition which would include a deduction for routine maintenance expense from FFO. 


Funds used for routine maintenance of apartments are not available for distribution to shareholders.

This excerpt highlights the problems:




The CORE FFO is equal to the quarterly dividend rate, but there is no adjustment to the cash flow number to account for routine maintenance expenditures which are high for apartments. 


IRT does reveal in its press release the amount spent per apartment in "recurring capital expenditures". 

For the 1st quarter, that number was $1.8 million or $115 per apartment. 

An annual average maintenance expenditure of $300 to $500 per apartment would be a normal range. If I deduct $1.8M from IRT's quarterly Core FFO of $15.974M, the AFFO per share number would be $.1577 or well below the quarterly dividend rate.

The question to ask is what is the more accurate free cash flow number that provides the coverage for the dividend.


B. Eliminated MSPRA-Sold 100 at $20.38:




Quote: Morgan Stanley Non-Cumulative Series A Preferred Stock


Profit Snapshot: +$56.26



I sold 50 of the 100 shares at a slight loss. Item # 4 Bought 50 MSPRA at $18.89. (1/5/19 Post)Item # 2.A. Bought 50 MSPRA at $20.7 (12/2/18 Post)

MSPRA Trading Profits to Date: $2,178.01 ($2,121.75 in prior trades, small lots)


Category: Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity Preferred Floating Rate Securities


MSPRA is an equity preferred stock that pays non-cumulative and qualified dividends at the greater of 4% or .7% above the 3 month Libor rate on a $25 par value. Prospectus 


The dividends are qualified and non-cumulative.  


This kind of security would become worthless in a bankruptcy.  


I have given up hope that the coupon will be increased over the 4%  base rate. 


Short term rates are likely to remain low for longer than I previously expected. 

Unless the price dives below $18, I am not coming back to this one. 

One issue, which remains unclear to me, is what will happen when the Libor rates are no longer in existence. 

Currently, it does not matter since a .7% spread over the 3 month Libor is less than the base minimum coupon of 4%. 

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

24 comments:

  1. Using a 1 year YF chart, the S & P 500 day SMA line is at 2,776.03. So far today, the low was at 2,776.21, hit just before I published this comment.

    SPX is currently well below its 50 day SMA line (2,872) and slightly below its 100 day SMA line (2792).

    As previously noted, I am mostly in a lock down mode for new individual stock and bond purchases excluding short term CDs and treasury bills. I will be buying commission free stock ETFs on down days using the small ball trading restriction. I am nowhere near now what I would call a starter position in any of those ETFs.

    General Mills, Inc. (GIS)
    $48.22 -$2.88 (-5.63%)
    As of 11:22AM EDT

    GIS is reacting to a GS downgrade to sell from neutral and reduced the price target to $41.

    https://www.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/general-mills-stock-slides-after-goldman-downgrade-to-sell-14974631

    I own a few shares bought under the small ball trading rules with an average cost near $40. I will not be selling those shares in response to that downgrade to sell.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the update. Too early to tell, but nothing's looking particularly smooth at the moment....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Would you consider today a down day on which to buy tiny positions in ETFs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: Yes, I allocated $1K to small lot stock ETF buys today but the rally into the close, rather than an acceleration to the downside after piercing the SPX 200 day SMA line intra-day which is what I was hoping for, resulted in most orders going unfilled.The actual dollar sprinkle occurred in 3 ETFs and amounted only to $328.76.

      Delete
    2. Land: The small ball ETF buy "programs" are designed for a bear market trend of lower highs and lower lows with an unknowable ultimate bottom.

      If I knew the bottom numbers, of course, I would just wait for those to be hit before buying a single share.

      The predicate is a starting point near SPX 2945 as the high point and a prediction that the high point will likely be followed with series of lower highs and lower lows.

      If there is a rally that takes out the high point, then I will consider selling the highest cost lots.

      Otherwise, I just keep buying in small lots, with each purchase at the lowest price in the chain, until I reach the maximum allowable position for each ETF which is already set.

      This approach requires me to buy on the way down, to consider selling the highest lots when profitable, and to limit my overall risk using small lot trades bought commission free and maximum exposure limits taking into account my primary goal of capital preservation.

      So, yes, I am expecting lower prices. I do not know how low the prices will fall, nor does anyone else. I do not know when there will be a rally to take out the all time high. I am comfortable with the fact that I do not know the future. The question is how to deal with uncertainty which is inescapable.

      Delete
  4. While the S & P 500 traded today below its 200 SMA line, a rally in the last hour took this index back above that line, closing at 2,783.02. That is slightly encouraging. Maybe a better characterization is that the action today was better than a stick in the eye.

    Some pundits are saying that the market is just too pessimistic about a new trade deal with China.

    Pessimism is not reflected in the current SPX level, which does not reflect IMO any of the fallout from an all out trade war lasting a year.

    At most, the SPX index level, only a few percent off its all time high, is more reflective of a trade deal occurring a few months later than previously expected with some chest pounding and threats between now and then.

    It is still just inconceivable to the Stock Jocks that China and the U.S. will throw gasoline on each other and then flick a match.

    Donald keeps saying that our farmers will be one of the main beneficiaries of a new trade with China.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/443528-trump-patriot-farmers-will-be-among-biggest-beneficiaries-of-trade

    How so, I wonder?

    What has China done to American farmers other than be a major buyer of their products?

    Even with a resolution of a trade deal, China has gotten the message that it needs non-U.S. sources for important imports since the U.S. has already weaponized those products to beat China over the head.

    I doubt that the U.S. farmers will see anytime soon a return to pre-trade war purchases of farm products, particularly soybeans.

    And, unless the Trump administration is tone deaf, which is certainly possible, it is obvious that the U.S. will need to find alternative sources for rare earth minerals and lessen our dependence on China's exports of those minerals.

    There will also likely be some reduction in China's exports to the U.S. that will benefit primarily other foreign countries, who will replace China as a supplier. That will not impact the trade deficit but simply decrease China's trade surplus and increase the trade surplus of several emerging market countries.

    Those are some of the key lessons for this trade war with China.

    What is not known is how badly an all out trade war would be for the U.S. economy. Bad, yes, but how bad and how deep will be the repercussions? The Bond Ghouls are a lot more worried than the Stock Jocks.

    Most of Trump's $16B bailout of farmers, which was recently passed by Congress, will go to the huge agribusinesses, not the mop and pop farmers who are really struggling with what Trump's party and recent weather events have done to them.

    https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-trump-farm-bailout-20190528-story.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. I recently made some negative points about Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc (SKT), responding to a recent Brad Thomas article that view the stock as a strong buy but failed to mention anything in the article about its largest tenant Ascena.

    Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc.
    $17.10 -$0.65 -3.66%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/skt

    I am not totally against buying 50 shares at some point even though I have an unfavorable view. I am just not there yet. Buying a yield stock that I view as deservedly hated, which is the case for SKT, is just something that I do when the price has been smashed sufficiently.

    I was linking an old post in a soon to be published post and found a April 16, 2018 comment that was negative on CBL and Tanger.

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/04/observations-and-sample-of-recent_16.html

    SKT closed that day at $22.67. CBL was at $4.29.

    The 5 year annual average total return for SKT is at -8.83%.

    https://www.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/

    Since then, both stocks have plummeted with CBL plummeting to just over $.85 per share, indicating a possible bankruptcy in its future.

    Some common sense and basic investor knowledge are required when reading these bullish SA articles about SKT.

    First, no box retailer is going to escape the long term trend toward online shopping.

    Second, apparel retailers are hurting the most and will be smacked even harder when and if Donald imposes a 25% tariff on the remaining imports from China.

    Third, the clear trend is toward closing retail stores.

    Fourth, many apparel retailers are not going to make it for much longer.

    And, the SKT price action over the past several years is also sending anyone listening a clear warning signal.

    A recent bullish SA article on SKT is just silly IMO.

    https://seekingalpha.com/article/4266984-tanger-factory-outlet-different-think

    The author makes the claim that many Tanger locations are "in resort or similar areas". Assuming actual nearness to those locations which is not established in that article, how is that a major plus for SKT?

    The parents take the kids to DisneyWorld and everyone can't wait to go shopping at a Tanger factory outlet as part of their vacation experience? Really?

    A more realistic assessment by Michael Boyd contains relevant material supporting the bear case. One interesting point is that most of the outlet sales are not discounting their best products but are selling inferior products at an inferior product price that were made for those outlets.

    I doubt that the CBL SU bonds reflect their recovery value in a BK. I mentioned in that April 2018 a 2023 CBL bond that was then selling at 85.7. It closed today at 70.46, creating a YTM at that price of 14.393%. Trading volume is heavy.

    http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/BondDetail.jsp?ticker=C602921&symbol=CBL4074664

    For a few years now, I have avoided speculating on the recovery potential of bonds rated deep into junk territory. My observation about those highly speculative bond purchases was that I captured an average weighted current yield of close to 12%, with no return on the bonds since my realized profits just offset my realized losses including a few near total losses of bonds bought at deep discounts to par value.

    ReplyDelete
  6. While the S & P 500 did hold its 200 day SMA line today, several technical analysts noted that the break below 2800 confirmed a head and shoulders top.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/29/scary-pattern-forming-in-stock-chart-may-be-sign-of-another-move-lower.html

    For whatever it is worth, they are saying that the downside risk is to 2650 based on that chart formation.

    I don't view that downside risk number as defining the scope of the risk or its probability.

    An all out trade war could easily pierce that risk number with conviction, possibly finding support near the December 2018 bottom.

    As I have previously stated, the major risk now is that all an all out trade war with China hits the U.S. when the economy is already weakening.

    It is not possible to have confidence in a downside SPX risk number number, as technicians do with their charts, when and if that happens.

    The double top near SPX 2945 does look formidable with the last rally failing at 2,876 which was the close on 5/16.

    Currently, China and the U.S. are both making noises about how they are going to hurt each other. The all out trade war takes the huff, puff and blow your house down from talk to reality (apologies to the Three Little Pig nursery fable. Maybe pre-kindergarten fables are appropriate now as analogies.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought a head and shoulders would need to be based on closing values.

      The short term risks seem based on what's tweeted and sent in short firm notes in the next few weeks.

      I believe you found the right comprehension reading level for this problem.

      Delete
    2. Land: I am not a technical analyst. It is my understanding that the head and shoulders pattern was formed and the neckline was broken with a close below 2800 yesterday. This bearish chart pattern signal is separate from the 200 SMA line break, which did not happen based on yesterday's closing SPX level, and the double top formation which appears to be in place. All of the above are bearish chart patterns.

      My primary focus on chart patterns involves index SMA lines and individual stock trading price channels using generally a two year chart.

      Delete
  7. I am not impressed with the rally this morning.

    S&P 500 Index
    2,787.63 4.61 0.17%
    Last Updated: May 30, 2019 at 11:32 a.m. EDT

    Donald made some statements today about the China trade negotiations that may have misled some investors.

    Trump: “China would love to make a deal with us. We had a deal and they broke the deal. I think if they had it to do again they wouldn’t have done what they did. China is subsidizing products, so the United States taxpayers are paying for very little of it. I think we’re doing very well with China."

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-trump/trump-says-u-s-doing-well-in-trade-talks-with-china-idUSKCN1T01J6

    Trump will continue to mislead U.S. voters and investors about who actually pays the U.S. tariffs on China's exports.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "The Yield Curve Is Threatening Stocks in Regional Banks"
    https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/regional-bank-stocks-yield-curve-profits-prices-51559230622?mod=mw_latestnews

    I have quit buying even small ball positions in regional bank stocks and have pared my already immaterial position in that basket strategy. While I have not totaled up my current out-of-pocket dollar exposure, the amount would likely be less than $10K and is concentrated in those stocks that have over 4% dividend yields and low P/E ratios.

    The yield curve inversion's negative impact on their net interest margins is well known and understood.

    ReplyDelete
  9. South Gent,

    TWO made a 52wk low today and closed at $12.40, yielding 14.9%. CEO bought 3,500 shares @13.80 in February. I don't see any big news on the company, but they presented at KBW Real Estate Finance and Asset Management Conference today. The drop might have something to do with what they presented today at the conference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: All of the MREITs have been weak for the same reason regional bank stocks are declining. An inversion in the yield curve is probably the worst possible operating environment for a business built on interest rate spreads between short and longer term rates.

      I noted recently that both AGNC and NLY cut their dividend rates again. Declines in net asset value per share and dividend cuts can reasonably be expected in the current unfavorable yield curve.

      I sold out of AGNC and DX recently. I also discussed selling TWOPRC and will be discussing in my next blog selling out of TWOPRD. The GAAP numbers are worrisome for TWO.

      I still own 69+ TWO shares with an average cost of $14.81 , bought under the small ball restriction, but I quit buying after a purchase on 10/12/18.

      I am not pleased but am relatively content to watch it go down in price. At some point, I may average down with a small purchase using a commission free trade. I am reinvesting the dividend which is a form of averaging down. I would not be surprised to see a slight cut in the dividend rate when it is announced next month or later this year.

      Item 4. Eliminations: A. Sold 50+ AGNC at $17.83+:
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/12/observations-and-sample-of-recent_26.html

      Item 1. Eliminations: C. Sold 103 DX at $6.18-Used Commission Free Trade:
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/04/observations-and-sample-of-recent_24.html

      Item 3. Eliminations: A. Eliminated TWOPRC-Sold 50 Shares at $24.65:
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/05/observations-and-sample-of-recent_15.html

      Last TWO earnings report:
      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1465740/000146574019000035/twoq1-2019earningspressrel.htm

      I am not hopeful that I will be able to escape TWO with a total return in excess of the dividend yield.

      Delete
  10. South Gent,

    I don't have any TWO at the moment, but I am thinking of taking an initial position after an anticipated dividend cut.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tomorrow may be the day when the S & P 500 pierces the 200 SMA line.

    After the close, Trump said in a tweet that he was going to impose a 5% tariff on all Mexican exports effective on 6/10/19, which he will gradually increase by executive fiat until Mexico stops the flow of illegal immigrants to the U.S.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stock-futures-tumble-as-trump-slaps-tariffs-against-all-imports-from-mexico-2019-05-30?mod=mw_theo_homepage

    This executive order is yet another clear signal to other countries that granting trade concessions to Donald will not resolve trade issues. Even if the NAFTA 1.1 agreement is ratified by all 3 signatories, Canada and Mexico have to know that Donald will still come at them. He is completely untrustworthy. If any nation makes concessions to buy trade peace, giving Trump all or most of what he wants, he will just came back again later for something else.

    So far, the reaction to this latest salvo is muted in the futures' markets.

    E-Mini Dow Continuous Contract
    25,030 -160 -0.64%
    Last Updated: May 30, 2019 at 8:44 p.m. CDT

    E-Mini S&P 500 Future Continuous Contract
    2,771.00 -19.40 -0.70
    Last Updated: May 30, 2019 at 8:45 p.m. CDT


    U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note
    2.189% -0.029%
    Last Updated: May 30, 2019 at 9:55 p.m. EDT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gasp. I'm tired and have to go to bed. So I won't "pontificate."

      He's getting Mexico to pay for effectively a 'wall' that the US should be implementing.

      Read in WSJ that India and ? are working on fiat money that's not US based to avoid the Iran sanctions. He's taking away the US's hegemony.

      Delete
    2. Land: Trump is probably just using the tariff weapon to strong arm Mexico on the illegal immigration issue. The new tariffs will just be another major republican tax on U.S. consumers.

      The tariff on all of Mexico's exports will start at 5% and then increase another 5% on 7/1, and then an additional 5 percent on the first day of each month for three months (25% possible).

      Mexico will probably retaliate.

      In 2018, the U.S imported products from Mexico valued at $346+B and exported to Mexico $265+B.

      https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c2010.html#2018

      I am not yet aware of what law Trump is using to justify his unilateral imposition of these tariffs.He is basically using the tariff weapon to cause a foreign company to change its internal policies unrelated to trade. If the legality is upheld, then there is no clear boundary on how far a President can exercise this unilateral power to change a foreign countries internal policies unrelated to trade.

      I suspect that Trump will rely on the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act which has never been used previously to impose tariffs on products from a single country.

      International Emergency Economic Powers Act
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Emergency_Economic_Powers_Act

      Under a different law, the Trading with the Enemies Act, Nixon did impose a 10% tariff on all products after he ended the convertibility of the U.S. Dollars into gold, allegedly for the purpose of preventing a balance of payments crisis. U.S. v. Yoshida, 526 F.2d 560 (C.C.P.A. 1975):

      https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-yoshida-intern-inc

      Our allies did not appreciate being called enemies.

      It looks like the SPX 200 day SMA line will be pierced on a closing basis today. That would be the third bearish technical signal, following the double top formation and the head and shoulders formation with a break below the neckline.

      I would characterize the pre-market SPX slide to be very mild so far in response to Trump's tariff announcement. The thinking may be that Mexico will respond to this pressure and spend vast sums of money increasing border security at both the southern and northern borders.

      In the south there is a long border with both Guatemala (541 miles) and Belize (160 miles). The border with the U.S. is 1,954 miles.

      Delete
    3. I said Trump will back down with China and convince his base he won doing so. I'll amend.

      He still may, if he thinks that's in his best interest down the road. However, he is now showing with the Mexico game that he knows exactly what he's doing. The question is what is his game goal and game plan, which clearly doesn't care about US hegemony nor market / economy strength nor smaller businesses such as farmers in the USA. It's not really a question. One can't guess what odd-ball plot he's formed (in that recent conversation with Putin). Only that he is showing his hand that this isn't unthoughtout crazy. He's now weaponizing tariffs, and -knows it-, and is harmful without concern what those he's hurting including the country as a whole.

      When someone goes off the path of how to treat others, by this much, it's impossible to guess what they'll do or not do.

      This is always the fear with a sociopath-type. That they will be using buffoon looking actions to cover what is a plot that doesn't have a moral center.

      To be clear, the USA needed some changes in trade deals. These aren't it.

      Your info on laws and Nixon's use is very interesting in this picture.

      The VIX still isn't very high. Under 20.

      The VIX model incorporates a possible euphoric mindset of investors. That after the first panic, there's an assumption that all can be fine and recovery period before the underlying conditions causing problems are apparent.

      This is harder to navigate. The market is euphoric, and will grasp onto anything. The economy is not yet actually weak, just showing some signs of potential to weaken. However, with the problem coming from an individual making decisions... that general investor's mindset becomes less influential than whatever the individual decides. I imagine he'll say something to bring the market back. Well that was the end of that thought. I haven't yet incorporated it into a bigger picture.

      Wondering if when the start of a war has been the cause of a market panic and start of a crash, has the market followed that pattern of recovery before fully crashing? A declaration of war is finite, it's much harder for the market to go into a head in the sand reaction and recovery to a war declaration than to other economic triggers. This trade stuff is a war declaration as well, though still less "finite" or definitive than an official declaration of war.

      Meanwhile, the VIX is still in stable pattern.

      Delete
    4. Land: I view this latest action as consistent with the strong arm tactics that Trump has used throughout his business career. In that respect, it is no different from his use of ruinous litigation to avoid paying mom and pop businesses what he owes them.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/09/donald-trump-unpaid-bills-republican-president-laswuits/85297274/

      He is weaponizing tariffs to force Mexico to change its internal policies unrelated to trade which, if successful, will cost Mexico a great deal of money and resources. This will not go unnoticed by both foreign allies and foes.

      Peter Navarro, who I view as a wingnut, called the Mexico tariffs a brilliant move.

      https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-aide-navarro-investors-should-calmly-assess-mexico-tariffs-which-are-brilliant-move-2019-05-31?mod=mw_latestnews

      This move will appeal to Trump's base. The authoritarian overtones and overreach of Presidential powers will not bother them in the least.

      The market is not reacting much to this move IMO and is currently in a rally mode off the intra-day lows.

      Reading the tea leaf signal giving by today's market movement today-so far, the consensus opinion which appears to be shaping is that Mexico will bend to Donald's will, permitting the U.S. to dictate Mexico's internal sovereign decisions unrelated to trade, and may not even retaliate. We shall see soon enough. Personally, I do not see how Mexico can politically avoid retaliation or even approve NAFTA 1.1 for as long as the republican tariffs remain in effect.

      I will be leaving HQ shortly and have entered a few small ball ETF limit orders well below current bid prices just in case the Stock Jocks reassess the ramifications of this latest development while I am gone.

      Delete
  12. High quality bonds are having another good day.

    The ten year treasury yield has fallen to 2.17%.
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd10y?countrycode=bx

    The high yield for that bond this year was 2.79% (1/18/19) and the high within the past year was at 3.24% (11/18/18).

    The German 10 year is moving deeper into negative yield territory.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmbmkde-10y?countrycode=bx

    Since SPX started to slide this month off its 5/3/19 high (2,945), the price rise in my extremely overweight position in high quality bonds has offset the decline in my extremely underweight position in stocks (less than 10% of investable assets)

    While it remains to be seen whether this extremely cautious asset allocation will continue working, I am comfortable maintaining it now.

    I have started to pare my intermediate term bond allocation again. I have 4 limit orders to sell corporate bonds today at prices that I would not have though possible earlier this year, let alone late last year. I am not even considering the possibility of buying an intermediate or longer term bond at the current yields.

    With continued stock market declines, there will be a gradual shift back into stocks as prices fall and dividend yields rise. Currently, I do not believe the Stock Jocks are properly assessing the downside risks to the U.S. economy and corporate profits.

    ReplyDelete
  13. A reader commented to me that both sides pay an economic cost in a tariff war. That is undoubtedly true. In the ongoing tariff war with China, both sides will lose which is invariably the case in trade wars.

    China would suffer more than the U.S., as I have said, but China's President for Life is not up fo re-election and the Chinese can probably withstand more pain.

    The Extremely Stable Genius IMO is deliberately misleading the American people by saying repeatedly that China pays the U.S. tariffs which is why I am emphasizing that particular lie.

    His purpose is to convince U.S. voters that there is no harm to them from a tariff war since neither U.S. businesses nor U.S. consumers pay the tariffs in some combination, depending on the product and the ability of the U.S. importer to pass the tariff cost off to the ultimate consumer.

    Part of the U.S. tariff cost has been absorbed by China's currency devaluation that started in the 2018 Spring when all of the trade trouble started brewing.

    The Yuan has lost over 9% of its value against the USD which is almost sufficient to offset a 10% U.S. tariff when the importer pays in U.S. Dollars. (CNY to USD .15945 on 4/15/18 to .14486 on 6/1/19 or a 9.15% devaluation in the Yuan)

    Many of the items shipped from China are low priced products, and consequently the U.S. consumer might not even notice a price increase. So it is hard to measure the negative impacts to China's economy. Products will still be shipped. Potentially the most major negative impact for China will be U.S. companies shifting from China's manufactured or assembled products to a supplier in another foreign country. I have read of several small companies who have already shifted from a Chinese supplier to a Mexican one, just in time for possible U.S. on their shipments from Mexico.

    Donald has sent China a message, with his tariff threat on Mexico's exports, that there is no end to Donald wanting more and using the tariffs as a weapon, even after making a foreign country makes concessions and enters into a trade agreement with the U.S.

    Mexico made concessions to secure the new trade agreement, and here is Donald threatening to impose tariffs on all of their exports before that trade agreement even had a chance to be ratified by the three signatories.

    You can not negotiate with the guy since honoring an agreement in good faith means nothing to him and is something only losers do.

    China is going to make an official statement tomorrow about the trade negotiations.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/01/china-to-release-document-laying-out-stance-on-negotiations-with-us-amid-escalating-trade-war.html

    That could be a market moving event.

    I suspect that Mexico will be making some promises to step up capturing and returning illegal immigrants from Central America. Will Donald be satisfied with those promises and back down from imposing even the first 5% tranche?

    If you listen to his bluster, he wants to use the tariff weapon to force American manufacturers out of Mexico and back to the U.S. If that is his objective, then there is nothing that Mexico could do on illegal immigration to pacify the Extremely Stable Genius.

    Given the length of the southern borders with Belize and Guatemala, and its border with the U.S., Mexico could probably at best stem the flow rather than to eliminate it or even come close to eliminating it.

    It would seem that a large caravan of illegal Central American immigrants walking slowing to the U.S. would be easy pickings for pickup and repatriation but even that is not happening as shown by the recent 1000 person border fence breakthrough near El Paso.

    Given Mexico's record on stopping the flow, I think Donald will go ahead with the tariffs until Mexico produces results rather than just promising to do better. And, an escalation of the trade war with both Mexico and China could easily tilt the U.S. into a recession by year end.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/06/observations-and-sample-of-recent.html

    ReplyDelete