Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: ELC, EMP, FHLC, LRGF, VHT

Economy

Real disposable income increased fell .2% last month as real personable consumption expenditures rose .7%.  

Mnuchin stated last Sunday that the trade negotiations with China are entering the final lap and we will know soon whether there will be a resolution.  US-China trade talks are in the 'final laps': Steven Mnuchin tells NYT Overall, his comments sounded slightly less positive than recent comments. 

Mick Mulvaney says Trump China trade talks will be resolved in two weeks


As previously noted, it is possible that Donald will try to push the envelope too far which results in a breakdown. 


One kind of envelope push would be to insist on keeping U.S tariffs in place until China complies with whatever it has agreed to do. 


There is also some advantage to China IMO in stringing Donald along for as long as possible, moving closer to the 2020 election season, and then refuse to bend on one or more issues, daring the Duck to impose more tariffs on China's imports. China has a President for life while the U.S. still has elections with consequences. 


China is letting its currency decline in a 'snub' to Trump, ING says (the recent moves have been relatively small) The Yuan's most significant recent decline started in early April 2018, when the USD bought 6.27 CNY, and ended in November 2018 near 6.98 or about a 11.32% Yuan devaluation, roughly equivalent to wiping out the cost of a 10% tariff for U.S. importers. Currency Chart. US Dollar to Chinese Yuan Renminbi Rates THE USD/CNY currency conversion rate is now hovering around US$1 for 6.7-6.75 CNY, closer to the top end of that range currently.   


At various times in the past, Donald has claimed that China is paying the tariffs. That is not true. The tariffs are paid by U.S. importers and then passed along, in whole or in part, in higher prices for goods purchased by U.S. consumers. What Is A Tariff And Who Pays It? | Tax Policy Center
Does China Pay Tariffs? - FactCheck.org 


I wonder how many Trumpsters believe Donald's assertions that China pays the tariffs. 


A more insidious type of silent, as to cause, price increase, operating as a tax increase in effect, occurs when manufacturers raise prices for domestically manufactured goods, since the tariff creates a price umbrella for them. It is important to think of tariffs as taxes and the GOP has imposed a variety of new taxes over the past year or so on U.S. consumers. 


A case in point involves the GOP's tariffs on washing machines that have resulted in prices being raised by domestic producers for both washing machines and dryers in tandem, even though dryers are not covered by the GOP's tariff tax on U.S. consumers.  Trump's washing machine tariffs are costing Americans almost $100 more per appliance When will a republican acknowledge that Trump, with their tacit consent, has in effect imposed a $200 tax on U.S. consumer purchases of a washer and dryer set. The answer is of course never. 


++++

Markets and Market Commentary


How to Spot a Bear Market in Stocks - Barron's This article discusses Citigroup's "18 potential signs that a bull market has ended, including measures of valuation, sentiment, corporate behavior, and credit-market strength." Each indicator is assigned a red light (1) point, a yellow light (1/2) point or no lights (zero points). Before the 2000-2002 meltdown, the score was at 17.5. The indicators were at 13 before the 2008 meltdown. The current score is 7. 

The Citigroup equity strategist responsible for this model believes that it may provide some guidance during the next market selloff. If the total is over 10, be wary of buying the dip: “We would certainly turn more wary of buying the dips if the red flags headed over 10.” 


Some of the indicators currently in red include the Schiller CAPE P/E, which has been high for years, the yield curve, and net debt to EBITDA (excluding financials). 


Yellow indicators (4) include investment grade bond spreads and the trailing P/E at 21. 


So the worrisome signs are generally known to informed investors and relate mostly to debt, valuation using most but not all measures, and the flat yield curve. 


++++++

Trump

Donald really does not want anything related to his past finances revealed in response to subpoenas. Trump team sues Deutsche Bank and Capital One to keep them from turning over financial records to Congress - CNN


Donald believes that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for whatever he thinks that he has accomplished with North Korea. 


He is angling for the wrong Nobel. I am nominating him for the Nobel Prize for Fiction. 


President Trump has made more than 10,000 false or misleading claims since his inauguration-The Washington Post ("It took President Trump 601 days to top 5,000 false and misleading claims. But on April 26, just 226 days later, the president crossed the 10,000 mark — an average of nearly 23 claims a day in this seven-month period"). His cult members believe he is a truth teller even though it is virtually impossible for the Duck to make an accurate statement. I do not know a different descriptive term that adequately describes those who attend Trump rallies and cheer him as he tells one false or misleading statement after another. 


The following linked article discusses the now typical false claim made by Trump for no discernible reason other than to elevate himself by falsely criticizing and belittling others. Trump ridicules weather forecasters for getting it ‘wrong the most’ when they made a spot-on prediction - The Washington Post ("The “big, big” snow totals the president referenced simply were never predicted by any commercial or government weather agency." Trump just made it up).
++

Trump Will Win in 2020, Money Managers Say in Exclusive Survey My estimation is that Trump currently has about a 50/50 chance of re-election which could move up to 55% with no recession prior to the 2020 election His odds could go up or down slightly based on who is selected as the Democrat's candidate and the outcome of the China trade negotiations. 


++



The Trumpsters are upset that Dan McGahn told the truth which included his testimony that Trump asked him to lie. Trump and Allies Ramp Up Attacks as McGahn Emerges as Chief Witness in the Mueller Report

It was not only McCahn who testified under penalties of perjury that Trump directed him to fire Mueller or effectively end the investigation by limiting its scope to future events which would have resulted in Mueller's resignation.  

After McGahn threatened to resign rather than carry out the order to fire Mueller, the Duck requested Corey Lewandowski, a fierce Trump defender, to implement his order requiring Sessions to denounce the investigation, to clear Trump of any wrongdoing, and then to limit Mueller's investigation to future acts of election interference. Lewandowski took handwritten notes and later turned them over to Mueller.  


Lewandowski mentioned Trump's order to Hope Hicks. They got a giggle out it when Lewandowski that Sessions would become the first AG fired by a private citizen. He ask Hope to type up his notes which she did. 


Lewandowski then tried to get a senior White House official, Rick Dearborn, who had previously been Sessions' Chief of Staff, to implement Trump's directive, giving him the typewritten version of the directive from Trump. 


Dearborn testified that he refused to act on Trump's order, throwing the memo into the trash and later telling Lewandowski that he "acted" on the order.  


So there are at least 5 people (probably 6 including Reince Priebus)  who testified that Donald wanted to stymie Mueller's investigation, either by limiting its scope to future acts or to fire him outright. All of these witnesses knew that lying to the FBI was a felony.   


Corey Lewandowski Dodges Trump's Wrath Over Mueller Report - Bloomberg


Stymied by aides, Trump sought out loyalist to curtail special counsel — and drew Mueller’s glare - The Washington Post


Trump claimed a lack of recollection when answering interrogatories under oath. 


This lack of memory about events occurring in 2016 was under oath and in response to the few questions that Mueller was allowed to ask Donald (no questions were permitted about obstruction) Trump said he could not recall, remember or recollect more than 30 times in his answers to Mueller - CNNRead: Trump's written responses to special counsel Robert Mueller-CNN So why did Mueller agree to all of that. Why not ask Trump when he is under oath questions relating to the obstruction investigation? 


Once free of the perjury law, Trump now has an excellent memory once again, back to having the greatest memory in the history of the universe since the Big Bang. 


Donald claims now that all of those people lied under oath and it is the Duck who is the truth teller: 




Trump says he did not try to fire Mueller. Here’s what Mueller’s report says. - The Washington Post


If he wanted to fire Mueller, he would have done it himself, which is an argument designed to convince the hopelessly brain dead. 


{Maybe I need to afford more credibility to the golden shower allegation since Trump's defense was similar, amounting to an argument that he would not have done such a thing since he knew that Russia had hidden cameras in the room. Comey talks Trump-Russia “pee tape” allegation: the claim, explained - Vox Donald is the only President in U.S. history capable of engaging in that kind of conduct IMO. Clinton may have had sex with a prostitute, and Kennedy was known for his infidelity, but neither of those Presidents would engage in the golden shower on a bed.}


Trump may want to read this statute before threatening potential congressional witnesses: 18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant | U.S. Code‘This is risky’: Trump’s thirst for Mueller revenge could land him in trouble - POLITICODonald Trump May Already Be Committing New Crimes | Vanity Fair


Donald's Presidency is proof beyond any doubt, reasonable or otherwise, that lying works in American politics, far better than being straight and honest with the voters, and repeating lies over and over again, even when they are easily proven to be false, works the best. 


The U.S. is fertile soil for an autocratic demagogue like Trump, nurtured and protected by both a political party and their fellow traveler media outlets pumping out false propaganda in support of this demagogue 24/7.  


This is not surprising: Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe; Mueller complained Barr did not fully capture context of Russia probe - CNN 


++++

1. Intermediate Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:

A. Sold 1 Morgan Stanley  2.75% SU Maturing on 5/19/22:




Profit Snapshot: +$22.29



Item 2.C. Bought 1 Morgan Stanley 2.75% SU Maturing on 5/19/22 at a TC of 97.017 (5/10/18 Post)

FINRA Page: Bond Detail


Sold at 99.346

YTM at 99.346 = 2.972%
Current Yield at 99.346 = 2.768%
Proceeds at 99.246 (after $1 commission)

This one is just outside the three year range for the short term bond ladder.

I will consider buying this bond back at less than 97.


The profit on this 1 bond was $22.29. The annual interest payment for that 1 bond is $27.5.


B. Sold 2 Boston Properties L.P. 3.125% SU Maturing on 9/1/23:




Profit Snapshot: +$33.83




I bought one of the 2 bonds last December at a total cost of 96.7. Item # 5.A. (12/26/18 Post) The other bond was bought in March 2017.


FINRA Page: Bond Detail


Sold at 100.321

YTM at 100.321 =  3.042%
Current Yield at 100.321 = 3.115%
Proceeds at 100.121 (after $4 commission)

I previously sold the same bond at 101. Item # 2.A. (1/8/18 Post)


Assuming no material adverse change in BXP's credit risk, I would consider restarting a position at less than 97.


C. Sold 2 JPM 3.375% "Senior Subordinated" Maturing on 5/1/23:




Senior subordinated is just a Wall Street name for junior bond that is subordinated to senior unsecured debt. That will not make much of a difference until there is a bankruptcy and the recovery for this junior bond would probably be zero or close to it.


Profit Snapshot: +$28.49




Item # 2.A.  Bought 1 JPM 3.375% Junior Bond at a TC of 98.975(4/30/18 Post)Item #1.A. Bought 1 (3/22/17 Post)


FINRA Page: Bonds Detail


Sold at 101.144

YTM at 101.144 = 3.072%
Proceeds at 101.044 (after $2 commission/$1 per bond at IB)

2. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:

$10K in adds


All treasury purchases mentioned below, both in the secondary market and at auction, are commission free. 

A. Bought 1 Treasury 1.25% Coupon Maturing on 10/31/19
YTM = 2.427%

I now own 5 bonds. 

B. Bought 1 Treasury Maturing on 9/19/19
YTM = 2.441%


The was a secondary market purchase of a zero coupon treasury bill. 

C. Bought 1 Treasury 1.625% Coupon Maturing on 8/31/19:
YTM = 2.407%



I now own 3 bonds.

D. Bought 1 Treasury 1.5% Coupon Maturing on 5/15/20:
YTM = 2.404% (note the yield flatlining with the one maturing on 8/31/19)  


I now own 4 bonds. 

E. Bought 3 Treasuries Maturing on 10/17/19 at Auction-6 Month Bills:
IR = 2.46%



6 month Treasury Bill Auction Results: 182 days




F. Bought 3 Treasury Bills Maturing on 6/25/19 at Auction: 56 Day Bills

IR = 2.429%


Auction Results:


Yet another punt using proceeds from maturing short term bonds or CDs.

3. Small Ball-ETF Adds:

A. Bought 5 FHLC at $44.03; 5 at $43.75 and 5 at $41.4 -Commission Free for Fidelity Customers:









Quote: Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF Overview


Closing Price Yesterday: FHLC $43.30 $0.14 0.33% 

Investors responded positively yesterday to the earnings report released by Pfizer and Merck: 

MRK $78.71 +$1.93 +2.51%: Merck & Company, Inc 
PFE +$40.61 +$1.02  +2.58%: Pfizer, Inc. 

Sponsor's Webpage: FHLC | ETF Snapshot - Fidelity


Expense Ratio: .08%


Last Discussed: Item # 5.B. Bought 10 FHLC at $44.59  (4/3/19 Post)


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule (Each purchase has to be at the lowest price in the chain. The next purchase has to be below $41.4)


Current Position: 25 shares


Maximum Position: 200 shares


B. Bought 10 LRGF at $31.93 (Roth IRA Account)-Commission Free at Vanguard:




Quote: 
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor USA ETF Overview


Closing Price Yesterday: LRGF $31.98 +$0.10 +0.31% 

Sponsor's Website: iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor USA ETF | LRGF



What is factor investing? | BlackRock

Fidelity overview of factor investing.pdf


Expense Ratio: .2%


Top 10 Holdings:




Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule


Maximum Position: 100 Shares


C. Bought 2 VHT at $168.75 and 1 at $160.81-Commission Free Trade at Vanguard:





Quote: 
Vanguard Health Care ETF Overview


Closing Price Yesterday: VHT $167.83 +$0.56 +0.33% 

Sponsor's Page: VHT - Vanguard Health Care ETF | Vanguard


Expense Ratio: .1%

Last Discussion
Item # 5.A. Bought 5 VHT at $173 (4/3/2019 Post)


I have nothing to add to that recent discussion.


Current Position: 8 shares


Maximum Position: 20 Shares (possibly 30 after a meltdown)  


Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule 

4. Eliminations:

A. Sold 70 EMP at $24.87:



1 Year History Schwab Account




Profit Snapshot: +$207.92 




Item # 1.B. Bought 70 EMP at $21.76 (1/2/19 Post)


Quote: Entergy Mississippi LLC 4.9% First Mortgage Bond


CategoriesExchange Traded Baby Bonds, a subset of Exchange Traded Bonds


Ratings: A2/A


Next Ex Interest Date: 6/27/19 


Par Value: $25


Optional Issuer Call Date: At anytime on or after 10/1/21


Unless called early at the issuer's option, the bond matures in 2066


Security: First Lien on Substantially all of issuer's assets 


5 Year Chart:  




Prior EMP Round Trips


Item # 2.A. Sold 50 EMP at $24.47 (7/22/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $66.98)-Item # 2.B. Bought 50 EMP at $22.85-A Roth IRA Account;


Item # 2.B. Sold 30 EMP at $24.44  (2/13/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $7.04)-Item # 4.A. Bought 30 EMP at $24.04-Used Commission Free Trade (5/28/18 Post)


EMP Trading Profits = $281.94 


Rationale: I currently own 6 Entergy Mississippi 3.1% First Mortgage bonds ($1K par value), with the last purchase discussed in this post: Item # 3.A. Bought 3 Entergy Mississippi 3.15% First Mortgage Bonds Maturing on 7/1/23 (2/13/19 Post)

I also own 1 Entergy Mississippi 3.25% First Mortgage bond maturing in 2027: Item # 3.A. Bought 1 at a TC of 96.53 Bonds & Politics: Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: ENBPRP:CA, VLY


B. Sold 30 ELC at $24.87-Used Commission Free Trade
Profit Snapshot: +$91.58 (excludes $20.22 from prior 2019 sell)



Item #3.A. Bought 10 ELC at $21.37-Used Commission Free Trade (12/12/18 Post)Item # 4.A. Added 20 ELC at $22.04-Used Commission Free Trade (12/17/18 Post)


CategoriesExchange Traded Baby Bonds, a subset of Exchange Traded Bonds


Last Sell DiscussionItem # 4.A. Sold 30 ELC at $23.48-Used Commission Free Trade (2/27/19 Post)(profit snapshot +20.22)


PAR VALUE:  $25



Interest Payments: Quarterly at $.304688 per share
Yield at a $21.82 Total Cost Per Share = 5.59%   
Trades Flat 
Optional Call: On or after 9/1/2021 at par value plus accrued and unpaid interest
Last Ex Interest Date: 11/29/18
Maturity Date if Not Called: 9/1/2066  
Credit Ratings: A2/A
Security: First Lien on substantially all Entergy Louisiana Assets

I still own the 2022 Entergy Louisiana 3.3% First Mortgage bond: Item # 3.B. Bought 1 Entergy Louisiana 3.3% First Mortgage Bond Maturing on 12/1/2022  (4/23/18 Post) I also recently pared my position in its 2026 First Mortgage bond:


DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep"Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

9 comments:

  1. The stock market dived and bond yields rose after Powell deflated somewhat the rate cut scenario.

    Powell merely said that the decline in inflation was likely transitory rather than persistent, which in turn suggests that the FED will be reluctant to cut rates from the currently abnormally low level without good reasons to do so. The current inflation numbers affirms only the no rate hike stance. Powell also said there was not a "strong case" for an interest rate cut in the near term, which I view as an obviously justified statement.

    The Stock Jocks want interest rates to go lower since that reduces the competition from bonds and credit risk free short term instruments. That has nothing to do with the real economy. Yields across the maturity spectrum are already low by any historical standard other than an ongoing depression.

    The ten year treasury yield was declining before Powell's news conference, falling to 2.46% intraday, and then quickly spurted up to 2.51% after his comments on the FED's inflation outlook.

    The most likely near term scenario that would trigger a .25% cut in the federal funds rate would be a termination of the trade negotiation with China followed by the imposition of more U.S. tariffs. The GOP's tariffs are already a drag on the U.S. economy.

    A resolution of that trade conflict, an uptick in inflation and inflation expectations and better economic numbers in the second half could trigger a rate hike at the December 2019 meeting or soon thereafter.

    In other words, the result is, as the FED keeps saying, data and event dependent.

    The probability of at least a .25% rate cut on or before the January 2020 meeting was at 71.3% yesterday and at 61% today.

    https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/countdown-to-fomc.html

    So that is a mild reaction to what Powell said today.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The market responded favorably to two REIT stock reports:

    STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG)
    $29.45 +$0.67 (+2.33%)
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/STAG?p=STAG

    Earnings Release:

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stag-industrial-announces-first-quarter-2019-results-300841029.html

    I have not discussed STAG in awhile. I traded it several times until I worked my way down to a 100+ share position with an average cost near $17. I am simply in a holding pattern now. I am not reinvesting the monthly dividend payments.

    The other REIT is GOOD that owns both industrial and office properties and has pays dividends monthly.

    Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD)
    $ 22.32 +$0.57 (+2.62%)
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GOOD/profile?p=GOOD

    Earnings Release:

    https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/04/30/1813074/0/en/Gladstone-Commercial-Corporation-Reports-Results-for-the-First-Quarter-Ended-March-31-2019.html

    I am in my small ball trading mode for this one, attempting to work my average cost per share down by selling higher cost lots profitably into price pops and buying only when the next purchase is at the lowest price in the chain. The lowest cost lot was bought at $17.62 (12/19/18). The average cost per share is at $17.9.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The TPVG earnings report released after the close looks okay.

    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190501005924/en/

    Book value per share rose 9 cents to $13.59 compared to the Q/E 12/31/18. Net investment income was reported at $.40 per share, up from $.34 in the 2018 first quarter, and comfortably above the regular quarterly dividend rate of $.36. In the earnings release, the Board declared that regular quarterly dividend with an ex dividend date later this month.

    I have been selling my highest cost TPVG shares into its rally. I am done doing that and am now in a holding pattern.

    In my Fidelity account, the average cost per share is at $11.71 with future purchases subject to the small ball rule. The last purchase was a 10 share lot bought at $11.20 using a commission free trade (12/18/18).

    I have pared my position in the Schwab taxable account down to 74+ shares with an average cost per share of $11.52. I am allowed by Left Brain's trading rules to buy 100 shares at less than $11 in that account.

    I eliminated the TPVG position in a Roth IRA by selling the remaining 56+ shares at $13.99 (4/16/19). I will require a lower price, probably below $12, before restarting a position in that account. And, that assumes no material adverse events.

    ReplyDelete
  4. U.S., China near deal to roll back some tariffs

    https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/01/us-china-deal-tariffs-1400007

    ReplyDelete
  5. I did participate in the 56 day treasury bill auction this morning. The auction resulted in a 2.439% investment rate:
    https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/annceresult/press/preanre/2019/R_20190502_2.pdf

    The 28 day and 56 day treasury bills are not a bad place to hide now compared to money market yields, particularly when the terms are staggered which is easy to do with weekly auctions.

    My highest yielding MM fund is the Vanguard Prime MM which has a current 7 day yield of 2.44%. Most of that fund's dividends are not sourced from treasuries which creates a state income tax issue that may effect a persons after tax yield compared to the short term treasury bills. Without looking I suspect that most states with state income taxes would tax at a minimum the non-treasury source dividend payments and a few would tax all of the payments (e.g. NY and its 50% rule which I previously discussed here).

    The ten year treasury is continuing to rise in yield, currently trading near a 2.55% yield. The 1 and 2 month treasury bills capture most of that yield. The issue, as always, is that no one knows the future. Will interest rates trend up or down? It was not that long ago, just as a reminder, that the short bill yields were at or slither above zero.

    In a comment published a week or so ago, I responded to an inquiry about whether I believe SPX was forming a double top or a base for another skyward moonshot. I was on the fence then, leaning slightly toward the base formation option. Now, I am still on the fence, but leaning toward the double top formation. The outcome of the China trade negotiations may resolve the issue with more precision, and that is in its denouement phase.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS)
    $15.91 +$0.11 (+0.68%)
    As of 9:40AM EDT
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/FDUS?p=FDUS

    Fidus released its first quarter report after the close yesterday.

    https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/05/02/1815677/0/en/Fidus-Investment-Corporation-Announces-First-Quarter-2019-Financial-Results.html

    NII was reported at $.39 per share, equal to the quarterly dividend rate of $.39. A reversal of incentive fee expense paid to the external manager added 2 cents for an adjusted NII of $.41.

    I would use the $.39 figure since that is the net income number created by the portfolio.

    Net asset value per share rose to $16.55 from $16.47 as of 12/31/18.

    While the unadjusted NII number is the same as the quarterly dividend rate, which is a negative IMO, FDUS estimated that its spillover NII (" taxable income in excess of distributions") was $.73 per share as of 3/31/19.

    Unlike other BDCs that I own, FDUS owns mostly fixed coupon loans (8 out of 61 loans are floating rate).

    I currently own 86+ shares and have sold my highest cost 52 shares (2 shares purchased with dividends) last February. I am still in sell the rips and buy the dip mode. The lowest cost lot was a 30 share purchase at $12.63 (12/18/18). The highest cost lot is a 50 share purchase at $13.87 on 11/23. That would be the next lot to be sold, but I am in a wait to see mode presently.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Today's rally did not resolve the question whether SPX was forming a double top or a base for another break-out move to the upside.

    The rally stalled at 2945 which is near the 2941 September 2018 high point that formed the first top.

    The market has a lot of momentum and something external and meaningful will probably be needed to deflate the enthusiasm. Excluding black swan type of events which by definition are not foreseeable, the only foreseeable near term future event that could have resolve this question is the China trade negotiation outcome.

    I would sum up the Stock Jocks views as accentuating the positive and ignoring the negatives which has worked well for them over the past decade. It did not work so well going into 2008 when they manage to ignore every warning sign about the rot clearly visible underneath the surface. The subprime and Alt-A loan fiasco was front and center starting no later than February 2007.

    The jobs report today had major negatives, which I will discuss in my next blog, but those were ignored to focus on the better than expected increase in new jobs.

    The same is true for earnings reports. The impact of bad earnings reports is quickly contained and isolated, not even coming close to infecting the overall market and with no conclusion drawn from those reports that call into question the overall bullish thesis.

    Inflation and interest rates remain supportive. There is not much that indicates a recession is on the horizon, with the odds probably around 10% of one developing within 12 months.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/05/observations-and-sample-of-recent_5.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. "" the only foreseeable near term future event that could have resolve this question is the China trade negotiation outcome.
    ""

    And there is it tonight!

    This won't answer whether it's a double top either yet. Could easily rally in a day or two.

    With that low of a risk of recession, this is a dip to buy into. Question is timing. Buy the first day. Or wait a couple days. I haven't timed these right yet. Either buying too soon, or not waiting long enough.

    Diagnosis happened in the family & I've been busy researching till I'm blurry eyed, but have been reading and appreciating your comments!

    ReplyDelete