Thursday, April 19, 2018

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: DOC, HBAN, PRMSX, ORIT

Economy

March Retail Sales: 





U.S. retail sales pop up 0.6% in March after three straight declines - MarketWatch


"Industrial production rose 0.5 percent in March after increasing 1.0 percent in February; the index advanced 4.5 percent at an annual rate for the first quarter as a whole. After having climbed 1.5 percent in February, manufacturing production edged up 0.1 percent in March. Mining output rose 1.0 percent, mostly as a result of gains in oil and gas extraction and in support activities for mining. The index for utilities jumped 3.0 percent after being suppressed in February by warmer-than-normal temperatures. At 107.2 percent of its 2012 average, total industrial production was 4.3 percent higher in March than it was a year earlier. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector moved up 0.3 percentage point in March to 78.0 percent, a rate that is 1.8 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2017) average." The Fed - Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17


Industrial production rises as capacity utilization at three-year high - MarketWatch


IMF lifts U.S. growth outlook on tax-cut view - MarketWatch-Sugar high? 


U.S. Standing Firm on Nafta Demands, Mexican Business Chief Says - Bloomberg



+++++++

Markets and Market Commentary

These beaten-down stocks look like bargains — and yield up to 8.1% - MarketWatch (this is a reprint from a Barron's article that discusses Sweden's big banks) 
Solid earnings may not prevent another correction: Robert Shiller: CNBC
This proven recession predictor is close to sounding an alarm - MarketWatch (the article is referring to a possible yield curve inversion). 

Investors Are Getting Worried About an Inverted Yield Curve-Bloomberg


I am not yet worried about a yield curve inversion for two reasons. 

First, it has not happened yet. 

Second, there are a number of abnormal non-market related  factors impacting intermediate and longer term interest rates. 

For the yield inversion to give a signal worth hearing, the market must be giving the signal rather than central bankers through abnormal monetary policies that result in interest rate manipulation. 

The intermediate and longer term rates are still being manipulated to abnormally low levels. The most significant manipulation is occurring among European central banks and the BOJ. Those manipulations keep intermediate and longer term sovereign debt yields abnormally low throughout the developed world. 

The FED is also maintaining a balance sheet that is abnormally large with its portfolio only gradually being reduced by redemption proceeds that are no longer being reinvested. System Open Market Account Holdings - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK (balance sheet was at $4.151+ trillion as of 4/11/18) 

Since U.S. intermediate and longer term interest rates are not being set in a free market, the signal given by a U.S. yield inversion, which correctly predicted prior recessions after a lag time, is different from prior yield inversions.



10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity-St. Louis Fed





10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 3-Month Treasury Constant Maturity-St. Louis Fed


++++++

Trump

Donald wants to throw Comey in jail. The President of the U.S. has tried and convicted Comey of various crimes outlined by Our Dear Leader in this tweet: 




‘This is not some tin-pot dictatorship’: Comey pushes back against Trump’s suggestion he be jailed 


That is one remarkable and extremely disturbing tweet coming from a U.S. President.  

I am reserving judgment on whether Comey violated a law by releasing classified information. Abuse of Power: The White House Slimes James Comey—Again: Lawfare 

Comey has denied under oath leaking classified information, but he is not the final arbiter on that question and neither is the President. James Comey memo: Did the former FBI director admit to leaking classified information in hearings? | PolitiFact (no he denied leaking classified information) 

As to Trump's claim that Comey lied under oath, Trump has once again created his own reality and then tried and convicted someone based on his false information. This is Trump's claim: 



This particular claim involves a Comey memo which he gave to a non-government lawyer friend who then discussed the contents with the press.  This is what Comey actually said:



There is no basis for a "perjury" criminal charge based on that testimony. First, the Comey memo was leaked to the NYT (5/16) after Comey's testimony on 5/3 and after Comey was fired by Trump (5/9). Dismissal of James Comey - Wikipedia So the testimony was accurate when given. 

Second, technically, Comey did not authorize anyone at the FBI to release this information and he did not personally talk to the reporters as the source. 

Trump just accused Comey of lying under oath. (He misquoted ‘Fox & Friends’ to do it.) - The Washington Post

What the Critics Are Saying About the New James Comey Book | Literary Hub  


Maybe Kim and Donald can switch jobs after their big summit, sort of like Wife Swap except the U.S. and NK will switch leaders in a new must watch reality TV series.  


I doubt the North Koreans will notice any difference. The NK "press" would not be the "enemy of the people" since they will dutifully fawn over and praise Donald and will never contradict his reality creations with facts.  


Kim could spray paint his hair orange and start making guest appearances on Fox and Friends. WP and NYT reporters could be used as targets in live round military exercises.  

Kim could become hugely popular among a particular segment of the U.S. population. And, Donald's critics could use a rest period from Donald, with KIM providing the entertainment during a much needed intermission period.  


Kim could follow through with Trump's threats on incarcerating people without due process and a fair trial. Lock them up and throw away the key based on the prerogatives of our Dear Leader. 

Comey and Hillary can share the same cell to save money. Trials cost money and they are so English. Why bother when Donald has already "told it like it is", as Trumpsters are fond of saying, since Donald is obviously a modern version of Honest Abe. 

Tracking over 2,400 false or misleading claims made by President Trump - Washington Post (the list includes only public statements made after his inauguration to 3/1/18) 

Trump will end up making more demonstrably false public statements during his four year term that all prior Presidents made combined into a single list. 

++


Trump threw Nikki Haley under the bus. 

At least she has a lot of company in that location. Nikki Haley finds herself under the bus as Trump shifts course on RussiaWhite House Throws Nikki Haley Under the Bus, She Flips It'Confused' UN envoy Nikki Haley hits back at White House - BBC News

Vlad will tell you that the Russian journalist Maxim Borodin slipped and fell out of a window: Russian journalist Maxim Borodin dies after mysterious fall in Yekaterinburg - CBS News  Donald thinks Vlad is a "strong" leader.  


Trade Surplus in Cars with China - FactCheck.org


Paul Ryan Misleads on Corporate Tax Revenues - FactCheck.org


Pruitt's Tall Tale on Toxic Cleanups - FactCheck.org  


Hannity’s rising role in Trump’s world: ‘He basically has a desk in the place’


Poll: Cruz running neck and neck with Dem challenger


Tennessee lawmakers punish Memphis for removing Confederate statues (actually, Memphis did not remove the two statutes, including one of Nathan Bedford Forrest, a founder of the Ku Klux Klan, but sold the two parks where the statues were located to a non-profit and the non-profit removed the statutes. The republicans thought that was "sneaky" even though it was perfectly legal)


There will be a special election in Arizona's 8th Congressional District next Tuesday. The incumbent GOP representative, a family value's republican, had to resign due to a scandal. Normally, this would not be a competitive district for the Democrats who did not even field a candidate in the last election. Trump carried the district by 21%. The Democrat candidate, Dr. Hirai Tipirneni, may make this a close special election.  Hiral Tipirneni (@hiral4congress) | Twitter

Dark money’ group backs Arizona Republican in special election

++++++++++++++

1. Eliminated T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets (PRMSX):


Profit Snapshot: $1,555.22 




Quote: PRMSX Fund - T Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund Overview - MarketWatch


I could not resist taking a profit in one of my T.Rowe Price Mutual Funds.


In this account, I can not take a broad snapshot since it would include my account number.


This snapshot comes from my own record of share purchases:



I will do this type of calculation for mutual fund shares to confirm the total profit calculated by the broker.

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) Fund Performance and Returns


2017: +42.85%

2016: +11.94%
2015: -11.49%
2014: + 1.41%

The fund has not generated much in distributions since I bought shares. There were no capital gains distributions and the following annual dividends:


Per Share

2017: $.26
2016: $.32
2015: $.16

Money is consequently made on selling the shares for a profit which I decided to do while I still had a profit to harvest.


2. Small Ball: Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy:


A. Bought 15 Physicians Realty at $14.55-Used Commission Free Trade:




Quote: Physicians Realty Trust (DOC)


2017 Annual Report


April 2018 Investor Presentation 


Position This Account Only: 30+ Shares (1 dividend Reinvestment so far)

Average Cost Per Share: $14.83
Dividend: Quarterly at $.23 per share ($.92 annually)
Reinvesting the Dividend: Yes
Last Ex Dividend Date: 4/2/18
Dividend Yield at TC = 6.2%

Last DiscussionItem 1.C. Added 5 DOC at $14.7 (3/12/18 Post)


I discussed in that post the earnings report for the Q/E 12/31/17.


SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 12/31/17 (total 2017 investment activity was $1.4 Billion)


In my previous posts, including the last one cited above, I criticized management for engaging in empire building that was not producing tangible benefits to its shareholders. FAD per share declined Y-O-Y for the 2017 4th quarter and was barely above the existing dividend payout. The share count went from 139.6M as of 12/31/16 to 185.27M as of 12/31/17. Normalized FAD did increase from $34.178M to $44.207, but FAD per share declined from $.245 to $.238 with the quarterly dividend payout at $.23 per share: 




Brad Thomas claimed that the payout ratio was now less than 80% in a recent SA article. He focuses on FFO which is not a free cash number. FFO for DOC excludes real cash expenses (routine maintenance expenditures) and includes non-cash revenues (straight line rent). It is not an appropriate number for  measuring a dividend payout ratio.  I am not sure why anyone would consider non-cash revenue created by an accounting convention to be cash available for distribution as a dividend or why money used in repairs to be cash that can be distributed to shareholders.   

If investors are going to value REITs based on cash flow rather than GAAP earnings, and want to properly measure dividend protection and to predict both dividend growth and its sustainability, a pretend cash flow number is not a prudent way to achieve those objectives.  

In short, I would agree with the market's assessment as reflected in the stock price over the past year.

The main investment thesis is that this REIT owns medical office buildings. Portfolio  


1 Year Chart: Bear Market Trend


In June 2017, the company sold 20M shares priced at $20.4: Prospectus  


In March 2017, 15M shares were sold at $18.2 Prospectus 


Anyone who bought shares in those offering and has held onto their shares have been torched and scorched. 


Any similar sized offering now would crater the stock. I would have to say that I would not be surprised by a large stock offering sometime this year that will harm existing shareholders. 


The last bond offering was $350M of 3.9% SU bonds maturing in 2028: November 2017 Prospectus


On 3/20/18, Morgan Stanley lowered its price target to $17 from $18 and maintained its equal weight rating.


3.  Small Ball: REGIONAL BANK BASKET STRATEGY:

A. Bought 20 ORIT at $15.14-Used Commission Free Trade




Quote: Oritani Financial Corp.

ORIT Analyst Estimates
Website: Oritani Bank: Corporate Profile ("The Bank currently operates its main office and 25 full service branches in the New Jersey Counties of Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic.")

This purchase concludes my ORIT buying program. I now own 100+ shares.


ORIT will benefit significantly from the lower federal income tax rates. 



10-K at page 81 

The bank responded to the tax cut by raising its quarterly dividend to $.25 from $.175. Oritani Financial Corp. Announces Increased Dividend and 2nd Quarter Results


My first purchase was 50 shares at $16.73. Item # 1.A. Bought 50 ORIT at $16.73 (12/26/17 Post)


This last purchase lowered my average total cost per share to $16.09. I will be reinvesting the dividend.  

Dividend: Quarterly at $.25 ($1 annually)

Oritani Bank : Dividends


Dividend Yield at $16.09 Total Cost = 6.215%


Last Substantive DiscussionItem # 5.A. Bought 20 ORIT at $15.88  (2/22/18 Post) I discussed the last earnings report in that post.


B. Bought 50 HBAN at $14.49-Used Commission Free Trade:





QUOTE Huntington Bancshares Inc. (HBAN)

About: HBAN is a super regional bank holding company. Its operating bank has 956 branches located in 8 states.




2017 Annual Report


On the day of this purchase, the consensus analyst E.P.S. estimates were $1.22 this year $1.33 for 2019. HBAN Analyst Estimates


P/E Based on 2019 Estimate and a $14.49 Price = 10.89


Dividend: Quarterly at $.11 per share ($.44 annually)


Huntington Bancshares Incorporated Declares Quarterly Cash Dividends On Its Common Stock


Dividend Yield at a $14.49 TC: 3.04%


Last Ex Dividend Date: 3/16/18


Last EliminationStocks, Bonds & Politics:Item # 3.A. Sold 100 HBAN at $16.12  (2/3/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $254.75)


As noted in that post, HBAN is not a major beneficiary of the corporate tax cut since it historically has had a low effective tax rate.


E.G. 3rd quarter 2017 10-Q at page 19:




Last Buy DiscussionItem # 1.A. Bought 100 HBAN at $13.58  (12/7/17 Post)


Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/31/17):


"Excluding approximately $123 million of federal tax reform-related estimated tax benefit, or $0.11 per common share, adjusted earnings per common share were $0.26."


For 2017, E.P.S. was .98 per share, "excluding approximately $152 million pretax of FirstMerit acquisition-related expenses, or $0.09 per common share after tax, and an estimated tax benefit of $123 million, or $0.11 per common share, related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act".


A number of financial metrics were skewed by the extraordinary items mentioned above, including ROA and ROE. 


NIM: 3.3%

Non-Accrual Loans to Total Loans: .5%
Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets: .55%
Charge offs to Average Total Loans annualized: .24%

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated Reports Record Quarterly and Annual Earnings


On March 22, 2018, UBS started HBAN at a buy with a $20 price target.


In a report dated 1/23/18, the Morningstar analyst placed a $15 per share fair market value. The price was then $16.03.


In a report dated 3/12/18, the S & P analyst had a $18 price target and a 4 star rating.


HBAN Trading Profits To Date = $434.13 


C. Started 10 Share Buying Program in HBAN Using Commission Free Trades:  


I bought the 50 share lot in my Schwab account where my free trades expire in August. Consequently, I will not start now a "buying program" with less than a 50 share lot purchase. 


I sent Fidelity more money and I now have 455 commission free trades that expire in April 2020. 





My small lot buys will hereafter be in that account. 


First 10 Lot HBAN Buy at $14.69  


I will average down in small lots but each new purchase will have to be at the lowest price in this series. 


4. Intermediate Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy

A. Bought 2 W.P. Carey 4% SU Bonds Maturing on 2/1/25


Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Credit Ratings: 



W. P. Carey Inc. Announces Pricing of Euro 500 Million of Guaranteed Senior Unsecured Notes ("€500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.125% Senior Notes due February 15, 2027")

Bought at a Total Cost of 98.477  (includes $4 Vanguard commission)
YTM at Total Cost Then at 4.259%
Current Yield at TC = 4.0619%


I previously bought and sold another WPC SU bond. Item # 4.D. Sold 2 WPC 4.6% SU Bonds Maturing on 4/1/24 at 105.382 (10/2/2017 Post)

B. Bought 1 Vodafone 2.95% SU Bond Maturing on 2/19/23:




I now own 2 bonds.


FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Issuer: Vodafone Group PLC ADR (VOD)

VOD Analyst Estimates
Report Q/E 12/31/18.pdf

Credit Ratings:



Debt investors

Bought at a Total Cost of 97.605

YTM at TC Then at 3.49%
Current Yield at TC = 3.0224%

C. Bought 1 Anheuser Busch Worldwide 2.5% SU Bond Maturing on 7/15/22:




I now own 2 bonds.  I am losing 9 BUD bonds next Monday that would have matured on 2/1/2019 but for BUD's election to redeem early.    


FINRA Page: Bonds Detail (prospectus linked)


Bought at a Total Cost of 97.824

YTM at TC Then at 3.048%
Current Yield at TC = 2.556%

++


AT & T is redeeming on 4/20/18 a 2.85% SU bond maturing in 2023. 
The outstanding principal amount is $1.75B. Bond Detail



I will be curious to see what the premium will be to par value. This makes no sense to me. Sometimes, this happens when a bond prospectus somehow restrains the issuance of new bonds. The only way to get rid of the problem is to redeem the bond. I did not check to see whether this was the case here. 

The bond has a make whole provision: 



5. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:


A Bought 1 Laboratory Corporation of America 2.625% Maturing on 2/1/2020-In a Roth IRA Account:




I now own 2 bonds in this Roth IRA account and 3 in taxable accounts.


FINRA PAGE:  Bond Detail (prospectus linked)


Issuer: Laboratory Corp. of America (LH) 

LH Analyst Estimates 
LabCorp Announces Record 2017 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results and Provides 2018 Guidance

Bought at a Total Cost of 99.58 (with $2 Vanguard Commission)

YTM at TC then at 2.864%
Current Yield at TC =  2.6361%

B. Bought 1 Treasury 1% Coupon Maturing on 9/15/18:

YTM = 1.873%



I now own 4 bonds.


C. Bought 1 Treasury 1.5% Coupon Maturing on 12/31/18:

YTM 2.036%




I now own 4 bonds.

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

19 comments:

  1. South Gent,

    Out of the REITs that you have discussed in your blog which ones have good dividend protection? Some of retail REITs will have challenges protecting their dividends in the current retail malaise. I'd like to pick a couple and wait it out while collecting the dividends. I have two on my watch list now: SRC and KRG. Thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: I am not actively looking at REITs that own retail properties. I am not reading earnings reports or paying any attention to them.

      REIT dividends will invariably exceed GAAP net income. When looking at dividend protection, it is important to look at funds available for distribution.

      In 2017 SRC reported GAAP E.P.S. of $.16 and paid out $.72 per share in dividends.

      Page 42:
      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1308606/000130860618000012/a2017sc10-k.htm

      For SRC, the 2017 cash flow numbers per share were $.78 for FFO and the AFFO was higher at $.84. I will need to look at those calculations more closely. You can see the adjustments in SRC's earnings release for the 2017 4th quarter:

      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1308606/000119312518053042/d542005dex991.htm

      For REITs that have triple net leases, the FFO and FAD numbers will be close to one another. When the REIT is responsible for operating expenses, including repairs, then the two cash flow numbers will start to diverge.

      SRC has predominantly triple net leases.

      I did at one time trade SRC. I sold my remaining shares at $11.17 in March 2016.

      Item # 4 Sold 154+ Spirit Realty at $11.17+ Roth IRA:
      https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/434935-south-gent/4864529-update-equity-reit-basket-strategy-3-21-16

      Prior to that I sold out at $12.78:

      Saturday, January 31, 2015
      Item # 1 Sold 100 SRC at $12.78 Roth IRA
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2015/01/added-50-met-at-4889sold-100-src-at.html

      The stock has been smashed, closing at $7.97 today. Looking at a five year chart, the bear market in this stock started after a double top near $13.65 during July and September 2016. The decline to today's close is 41.6%. So my question is what caused that decline and is the underlying problem still around?

      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SRC?ql=1&p=SRC

      That smashing will cause me to take a look, probably for no more than a 50 share opening buy and a "10 share buying program" thereafter.

      I did recently look at SRC's bonds but passed on a buy for now. I do not recall which one, but it was probably this 2.875% coupon maturing in May 2019:

      http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/BondCenter/BondDetail.jsp?ticker=C611433&symbol=SRC4126788

      That one is a busted convertible.

      I do not recall ever owning KRG.

      Equity REITs are still in a bear market, and it could get a lot worse with a spike in intermediate term interest rates. I am consequently buying small lots and averaging down.

      Delete
    2. Y: I spent a few minutes looking at SRC and decided to pass for now. I will wait to see whether it is successful in spinning off its ShopKo stores, the largest SRC tenant, into a new REIT.

      See page 9 of the Annual Report:

      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1308606/000130860618000012/a2017sc10-k.htm

      This is a good report:

      http://clarkstreetvalue.blogspot.com/2018/01/spirit-realty-leveraged-shopko-spinoff.html

      Delete
    3. South Gent,

      Thank you for the quick response and the link to MDC blog. It's a good read.

      I will do more research in non-retail REITs.

      Delete
  2. Bad day for bonds. The problem started for the Bond Ghouls with the German 10 year spiking in yield.

    Germany 10 Year Government Bond
    0.603% + 0.069
    13% increase

    The ten year TIP break-even yield hit the highest level in more than 3 years.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/inflation-expectations-reach-the-highest-in-more-than-three-years-2018-04-19

    One event that could jar both the Stock Jocks and the Bond Ghouls would be higher than currently expected inflation and inflation expectations. The breakeven inflation rate for the 10 year TIP closed today at 2.17%. The rise in crude oil prices may have sparked some inflation worries.

    Th breakeven inflation rate number represents the market's anticipated average annual inflation rate for the next 10 years.

    iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
    $119.32 -$0.98 -0.81%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/tlt

    iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
    $101.91 -$0.26 -0.25%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/ief

    The Stock Jocks had their standard knee jerk response to rising interest rates. REITs had a down day while regional banks rose in price.

    SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
    $60.66 +1.09 +1.83%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/kre

    Vanguard Real Estate ETF
    $74.74 -$1.10 -1.45%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/vnq

    For some regional banks, I am starting to see increases in deposit costs outpace increases in loan yields. That is due to the flattening yield curve. For NIM to increase, loans and investments yields will need to reprice higher at a faster rate than deposit costs.

    The consumer staple sector was hit harder than equity REITs based on a couple of lackluster earnings reports:

    Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
    $51.35 -$1.53 -2.89%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlp

    PG and MO led the way down.

    Altria Group Inc.
    $57.78 -$3.72 -6.05%

    Philip Morris International Inc.
    $85.64 -$15.80 -15.58%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pm

    Procter & Gamble Co
    $74.95 -$2.5328 -3.27%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pg

    I am in a "buying program" for PG using commission free trades. I currently own 33 shares and can now buy 2 more at the current price, with the last buy being at $76.

    The VIX had a negative correlation day with the SPX:

    CBOE Volatility Index
    15.96 + 0.36 +2.31%

    S&P 500 Index -15.51 -0.57%
    WATCH
    LIST
    CREATE
    SPX
    ALERT

    ReplyDelete
  3. South Gent,

    GE is up more than 4% as of 10 am this morning after earning release. Is it the dead cat bounce? I looked at GE's segments and think it won't go away any time soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y: I still believe a GE is not likely to go up much and will tread water until the next recession when the price will fall below $10. My current inclination is to wait for that to happen before buying back any of the shares previously sold.

      I was not impressed by the quarterly report.

      https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ge-profit-and-revenue-top-estimates-stock-soars-2018-04-20

      Most importantly for me, GE is plagued by a number of self-inflicted wounds, including accounting issues that call into question whether anything can be taken at face value in a GE earnings report.

      Delete
  4. Analysts are downgrading PG and/or reducing their price targets after yesterday's earnings report.

    Merrill Lynch: Buy to Neutral
    Argus: Buy to Hold
    Stifel: Price target to $83 from $85
    Suntrust: Price target to $75 from $90

    I do not have access to those reports. PG was ex dividend yesterday for its $.72 quarterly distribution.

    Consumer stable stocks are weakening after several companies reported product price declines or anemic price increases. In the first quarter, Unilever was able to raise prices only .1% while Nestle reported a .2% increase in prices. PG is having to cut prices in its shaving business due to competitive pressures. Input costs are rising at a faster rate squeezing margins.

    I am sticking with my "buying program" for PG using commission free trades and will quit once I reach 50 shares. I am now at 33 and may buy 2 more today.

    ReplyDelete
  5. HI SG, DO you own any PM or MO? Any thoughts on iQOS vs vaping and if these stocks are headed for extinction. (Leaving health issues aside)

    https://seekingalpha.com/news/3347220-philip-morris-sized-slow-pace-iqos-adoption

    thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. G: I do not own either MO or PM.

      I do not have an opinion on iQOS vs vaping.

      I do believe that cigarette smoking in whatever form will steadily decline.

      In my area, I rarely even see a person smoking.

      Delete
  6. It is interesting to me that the consumer staple area is getting hit ; at first I thought it might be due to rising rates and higher p/es; but it looks like price competition ie, PG, KMB is the cause; also today PEP is getting hit;

    What I was wondering if this is a canary in a coal mine effect in terms of a general reduction of what is going on in the market; to me drug and medical costs will probably soon soon be under price Just look at companies like Walgreens, CVS.

    And I think drug companies are probably next.

    I would not be surprised if there is monetary competition for data storage i.e. the cloud, chips in computers and phones etc.

    At first I thought some of this was related to the Amazon effect, but I wonder if there is a deeper problem related to consumer debt and people being more frugal in general. Also companies demanding better pricing.

    It looks like were having a rolling correction in the market also.

    Any thoughts on this would be helpful

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. G: It is a combination of no pricing power plus increases in the costs of production and distribution, which together squeeze margins. That is not a mixture for E.P.S. growth.

      GIS had a serious problem last quarter in rapidly rising freight transport costs.

      There is also a tendency to cut advertising when margins are under pressure, which may cause a loss in market share.

      Amazon and other large retailers particularly WMT are placing pressure on prices and that is part of the problem.

      CVS and Walgreens are both high cost retailers. It is not a struggle to find product prices lower than at their retail stores without having to leave my desk.

      There is also the problem of substituting store brands for brand name products.

      Nonetheless, valuations in this sector are at least approaching what I would view as reasonable and the dividends are in a few cases over 4% now (e.g. GIS). I will be nibbling as the stocks move down in price. Those buys are clearly contrarian in nature.

      I sold my KO position last June believing that further share price gains would be hard to come by.

      Item # 2 .A. Sold 265+ KO Shares at $45.85+:
      Profit Snapshot: $5,338.55
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2017/06/observations-and-sample-of-recent_25.html

      In my mind's eye I am gradually redeploying the proceeds starting this year into consumer stable stocks that have been crushed in price. I have a very long way to go before using up those proceeds.

      Coca-Cola Co.
      $43.74 -0.57 -1.29%
      Last Updated: Apr 20, 2018 at 2:03 p.m. EDT
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ko

      Delete
  7. South Gent,

    I think in addition to the factors you have outlined in the above comments it might also be a sector rotation at the market top.

    I did some contrarian plays last week with a small position in GIS. I might also take a nibble at PG soon.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There are a number of large caps that are near or below the price levels prevailing five years ago.

    The S & P 500 is currently over 1000 points above where it was in April 2013:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/spx/charts

    IBM was trading slightly over $200 in April 2013.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ibm/charts

    PG was near $77 in April 2013:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pg/charts

    NVS was hovering near $74:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/nvs/charts

    GIS was mostly over $50 in April 2013:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/gis/charts

    CPB was over $46.
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/cpb/charts

    Welltower was near $75:
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/well/charts

    Late today, I used some commission free trades to buy the preceding stocks in a sprinkle purchase strategy where I generally spend anywhere from $500 to $2000 in total.

    GIS 2 AT $43.33
    IBM 1 AT $144.66
    CPB 5 AT $39.81
    WELL 2 AT $51.15
    NVS 2 AT $77.91
    PG 2 AT $73.96

    All of these out-of-favor contrarian buys were part of my small lot buying programs. For each stock in those programs, and there are a number of them now, every new purchase has to be below the price of all others in the chain.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This week's Barron's contains a favorable article on GIS. Like most material in this subscription publication now, the article is what I would call twitter financial journalism.

    https://www.barrons.com/articles/general-mills-shares-are-in-the-bargain-aisle-1524268801

    The author notes that the OUI yogurt and a new Chocolate Peanut Butter Cheerios generated "nearly 1%" of sales.

    The author maintains that some cost pressures are temporary and will abate, referring to spot freight costs and outside manufacturing.

    YTD decline in GIS is at 27%. The average premium to the S & P 500 multiple over the past five years is 12%, but the stock is now selling at a 18% discount to that multiple. (information is from FactSet reprinted in this Barron's article)

    The stock may receive a Barron's bounce on Monday.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello southgent,

    I wanted to get your take on S&P earnings versus GDP. I reference below two articles one from SeekingAlpha and one from Brian Gilmartin's blog. He is one of the few people that I follow on SeekingAlpha.

    He makes a case in his article that earnings albeit perhaps manipulated by the tax reform phenomenon, earnings of the S&P are rising.

    As I understand it from the article, this is making the case that that there is a rise in treasury yields that will make earnings less valuable.

    He does think however that the S&P on earnings basis is not overvalued. He thinks there is less downside risk than many.

    In his blog, it looks like he is thinking that the 10 year bond will be above 3% for the year. He references an intermediate output indicator that shows the growth of GDP of last quarter and 7 1/2%.. He believes this is a leading indicator of economic growth.

    As you have been saying this sounds like a bear market in bonds; but he thinks a relative floor in stock prices. I was unable to get the links that he has in his article blog.

    I wondered what your take was on this line of thinking and whether or not the short term gyrations of the market are a good trading opportunity. And what is happening to GDP

    Thank you


    https://seekingalpha.com/article/4164619-s-and-p-500-earnings-might-less-important-bond-market-2018

    http://fundamentalis.com/?p=7701

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. G: The traditional valuation measures have been unusually high for several years. The stock market capitalization to GDP ratio has been out of its traditional range, which is below 100%, since 1996:

      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DDDM01USA156NWDB

      The market is overvalued based on that indicator but that has been the case for years:

      https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2017/09/06/market-cap-to-gdp-an-updated-look-at-the-buffett-valuation-indicator

      The same is true for other traditional valuation metrics like the Shiller P/E, the Crestmont P/E, the trailing GAAP 12 month P/E and the Q Ratio:

      https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2018/04/04/market-remains-overvalued

      This table has historical TTM GAAP P/Es. That P/E ratio has been historically high most of the time since 1992:

      http://www.multpl.com/table

      The forward non-GAAP E.P.S. estimate for the S & P 500 is above its modern historical average which is close to 14.

      The tax benefit will give a one time lift to Y-O-Y E.P.S. comparisons.

      The future non-GAAP E.P.S. estimates do not take into account a recession or other events that could depress estimates (e.g. the substantial adverse impact on energy earnings starting in the summer of 2014 due to the crude oil price collapse)

      All of these valuation metrics have not been reliable market timing devices. The market has continued to move higher even though all of those measures, other than the current 12 month forward non-GAAP E.P.S. estimate, are way out of line with long term averages.

      As to interest rates, bonds are probably more in danger of having a down total return year than stocks. That is the case so far this year as I will discuss in the next post.

      The ten year treasury will go through 3%, but it remains to be seen how high it will go.

      The rise in interest rates will take away some of the favorable impact from lower rates and consequently has a direct negative impact on profits.

      Consumers who are already leveraged will have to pay more to service their debt including mortgage debt that resets. Higher market rates + expensive homes will crimp the housing sector.

      Earnings become less valuable for those investors who discount future earnings using a treasury interest rate.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-04/how-spiking-bond-yields-really-could-topple-a-stock-market-rally

      The newly nominated FED Vice-Chairman Richard Clarida believes that the "natural" interest rate is currently 2%.

      https://www.barrons.com/articles/what-the-feds-newest-members-mean-for-rates-1524167915

      There could be significant push back, among certain FED members, for higher rates after the FF rate is raised to a 2% to 2.25%. The current range is 1.5% to 1.75%.

      The market is currently estimating a 90.2% probability that the range will be 2% to 2.25% on or before this December's meeting.

      http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/countdown-to-fomc.html/

      It is hard for me to the U.S. ten year going much above 3% as long as the German 10 year is hovering near .6% with other 10 year sovereign debt issues well below 2%.

      Switzerland 0.07%
      Netherlands 0.73%
      France 0.80%
      Spain 1.26%
      U.K. 1.48%
      Japan 0.05%

      https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds

      Historically, the stock market has done just fine with the ten year treasury in a 3.5% to 4.5% range.

      This time may be different given the vast amount of additional corporate debt compared to the past, the fact that the debt was used in large part to buyback stock rather than to improve operations and to expand the businesses, and the investor shock effect from having normal interest rates which is what a 4% ten year treasury yield is.

      Delete
  11. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2018/04/observations-and-sample-of-recent_23.html

    ReplyDelete