Saturday, December 7, 2019

CJREF, DUK, GCI, HSEPRC:CA, IBB, IEMG, IEUR, M, PPL, PFXF, PRPFX, SCHK

Economy:

ADP reported that 67,000 private sector jobs were added in November. ADP National Employment Report | November 2019U.S. private sector job growth slows down sharply in November: ADP - MarketWatch


That ADP report is not consistent with the BLS estimate for November which showed a robust gain of 266,000 jobs, helped by the return of approximately 46K GM workers who were on strike in October. The consensus estimate was for +180K. Employment Situation Summary


Of the 266K jobs added in November, 254K were in the private sectorTable B. Establishment data, seasonally adjusted Seasonal retail hiring will surge in November. The question is whether the seasonal adjustment for temporary seasonal workers is accurate.   


The BLS also revised its October number to 156K from 128K and its September number to 193K from 180K. 


The unemployment rate fell to 3.5% from 3.6% in October. 


Annual wage growth was reported at 3.1%. 


The work week remained unchanged at 34.4 hours. 


The U-6 fell to 6.9% from 7%. Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization  


US Jobs Report November 2019: 266,000 payrolls added and 3.5% rate  ("The U.S. economy needs to create about 107,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady, according to calculations from the Atlanta Federal Reserve.")


With the revisions to the September and October numbers, the 2019 average monthly through November currently stands at 180K, down from 223K in 2018. 


There is no way to reconcile the ADP and BLS numbers for November. 


One of the two reports is just way off or maybe even both which is a problem when relying on surveys using sampling techniques. 

The "confidence" rate in the BLS data is plus  or  minus 110,000 jobs. (see PDF page 10 under "reliability of estimates": The Employment Situation - November 2019,PDF version  

The BLS estimates are revised several times. There was a recent revision of employment data going back to February 1990. 

See discussion at The Big Four Economic Indicators: November Nonfarm Employment - dshort - Advisor Perspectives

Based on the +1.22% DJIA advance yesterday, the Stock Jocks accepted the BLS report as set in stone by God while the ADP report was dismissed as Fake News.  

When both reports start to turn negative, then I will worry. 

For now, all that I can say with some confidence is that the U.S. economy is continuing to grow sufficiently to create jobs in excess of what is necessary for new entrants into the labor force. Wage gains are decent but not spectacular. And, knowing the problems with conclusions drawn from samples, I did not become excited yesterday with the better than expected employment report. 

U.S. economy’s huge service sector slows again in November, ISM finds - MarketWatch (53.9% down from 54.7% in the prior month)

Mnuchin says U.S. economic growth will pick up significantly in coming quarters - MarketWatch Mnuchin bases his forecast on the tax cuts and the manufacturing slowdown directly connected to Boeings problems, which may be moving into a resolution phase, and the GM strike which is over. 


On the same day that Mnuchin represented that growth would pick up due to the tax cuts, the Organization for Economic Cooperation (OCED) issued a report finding that U.S. tax revenue as a proportion of GDP dropped the most compared to all other countries during 2018. US lost more tax revenue than any other developed country in 2018 due to Trump tax cuts, new report says  


During the trading day last Thursday, Trump represented to investors that the China trade negotiations were "moving along well."


US and China disagree on size of agriculture purchases, WSJ report says


Yesterday morning, Larry Kudlow represented that a trade deal with China was close and were in the "intense" phase. Kudlow calls U.S.-China deal 'close' as talks in 'intense' phase - MarketWatch Kudlow cautioned that Donald was willing to "walk away" if some conditions are not met. Kudlow says a trade deal with China is 'close' amid 'intense' talks


CNBC’s Cramer says U.S. ‘can walk away from the table’ in China trade talks after jobs report - MarketWatch



+++

Markets and Market Commentary:

Growth stocks still have room to run before reaching previous bubble valuations, Credit Suisse strategist says - MarketWatch

Bull markets often end with a euphoric 'blow-off top' rally That is the case with long term secular bull markets. The blow off top may last for an extended period and will be shaped as a parabolic spike occurring after a decade or so of SPX annual average total returns of around 15% or so. 

How many Goldman Sachs private equity clients are preparing for a recession? Every single one of them - MarketWatch

+++++

Trump

Impeachment Report Says Trump Solicited Foreign Election Interference That is unquestionably the case but the crux is that he conditioned military aid on an investigation of the Bidens. 


Impeachment hearings live updates: Scholars called by Democrats testify that Trump’s conduct is grounds for removal from office

Impeachment report details contacts between Giuliani, White House, the Hill columnist John Solomon and Devin Nunes (the creators and/or disseminators of fact free conspiracy theories).

5 takeaways from the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report on Trump

GOP embraces a debunked Ukraine conspiracy to defend Trump from impeachment - The Washington Post Republicans will do just about anything to protect Donald including embracing Russian talking points about the Ukraine and furthering Russia's foreign policy goals at the expense of U.S. national security interests.

Opinion | Trump Is the Founders’ Worst Nightmare - The New York Times The architects of the U.S. Constitution were very concerned about a demagogue becoming President. How Hamilton Warned In The Federalist Papers Against Donald Trump – ThinkProgressThe Federalist Papers No. 1Federalist Paper No 85Electoral College Was Created to Stop Demagogues Like Trump | Time 


In Donald's case, the Electoral College provided him a path to the Presidency by narrowly winning the popular vote in 3 states while losing decisively the nationwide popular vote. The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated)  

In Trumpworld, Donald won the popular vote since there were 4+ million illegal votes for Hillary and Donald did not receive one. Trump and Massive Voter Fraud Allegations (2/13/2017 Post), quoting Donald statements made in his interview with David Muir. TRANSCRIPT: ABC News Anchor David Muir Interviews President Trump - ABC News


Barr disputes key inspector general finding about FBI’s Russia investigation The inspector general is not a partisan hack like AG Barr who is Trump's puppet. Barr's DOJ is simply a reflection of Donald.  

Appeals court refuses to block House subpoena for Trump’s financial records The Supreme Court may review this decision and/or the appellate court decision allowing the NY AG access to those records. 


++++


Trump allies received hundreds of thousands of dollars under federal health contract - POLITICO  

++

Nunes Misuse of Defamation Lawsuits:

Nunes Hits CNN With $435 Million Defamation Suit Over Its Ukraine Report | Talking Points Memo Nunes is upset that CNN and other media outlets reported Lev Parnas's allegation that Nunes met with Victor Shokin in Vienna. (e.g. Devin Nunes directly pushed for Biden Ukraine investigations, says Lev Parnas - Vox)


Prior to publication, CNN asked Nunes repeatedly to respond to the allegation, but he refused to make any comment. Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress that Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden - CNNPolitics Nunes told the Fox personality Sean Hannity that he did not respond to protest "fake news". 


I view the lawsuit as frivolous.  


The only way to stop Nunes from filing frivolous defamation lawsuits is to win one, then sue Nunes and his lawyer for malicious prosecution, winning that suit in a big way with a substantial punitive damage award, and then doing everything possible to collect the judgment. 


Nunes is bringing the lawsuits, as I previously discussed, in Virginia which has a weak anti-slap law. The Virginia Defamation Law Blog; Devin Nunes Demands Satirical Internet Cow Stop Making Fun Of Him… Or Else | Above the LawWatchdog Slams Order Allowing Nunes to Sue Twitter in Virginia


Phone records link Giuliani associate Lev Parnas to Republican Congressman Devin Nunes - CBS News Nunes claims that he may have talked to Parnas but will need to go through his phone records. Devin Nunes tells Hannity 'it's possible' he called Lev Parnas, Giuliani's indicted associateDevin Nunes Tries to Explain Away His Lev Parnas and Rudy Giuliani Calls to Sean Hannity The calls with Giuliani were held to exchange jokes as I understand his claim now. 


+++++


All trades are commission free unless otherwise noted. 

I am shifting proceeds received from small stock ETF liquidations into individual stock purchases. 


While I view those purchases as trades, stocks are selected in part based on a willingness to hold longer term at the prices paid for them.   

1. Bought 100 PPL at $33.9


Quote: PPL Corp. 

Closing Price Yesterday: PPL $34.37 +$0.05 +0.15% 

2020: $2.52 as of 12/1/19 
P.E. at $2.52 and $33.9 = 13.45

PPL is a holding company that owns Louisville Gas & Electric, Kentucky Utilities, PPL Electric Utilities (about 1.4M customers in central and western Pennsylvania) and Western Power Distribution (the U.K.'s largest distribution network serving 7.9M customers). 

Home - PPL Corporation

Only the two Kentucky utilities own generation.  


Dividend: Quarterly at $.41 per share or $1.64 annually

PPL Corporation Common Stock (PPL) Dividend History | Nasdaq


Dividend Yield at $33.9 = 4.84%


Next Ex Dividend: 12/9/19

PPL 5 Year Chart: Roller Coster Going Nowhere 


After bottoming near $26 in June 2018, the dominant trend has been up, but the price is about where it was 5 years ago after the rally off the June 2018 low. 


Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/19): PPL Corporation Reports Third-Quarter 2019 Earnings








GAAP Earnings: $475M or $.65 per share, up from $.62 Q/E 9/30/18


2019 Guidance: E.P.S. $2.35 to $2.45

The "company reaffirmed its expectation of 5% to 6% compound annual earnings growth per share through 2020 based on its original 2018 earnings forecast midpoint of $2.30 per share. In addition, PPL maintained its 2021 earnings forecast range of $2.50 to $2.80 per share." 


The major  knock on this company IMO is its U.K. distribution business which is a major part of PPL's operations. 

In a 11/5 Morningstar report, the analyst claimed that the U.K. regulators recently "suggested just 4% rates of return of gas distribution, gas transmission and electricity transmission". The S & P analyst believes this concern is overblown but there will not be any clarity on the issue either until 2021. 



If a 4% rate of return was applied to electricity distribution, then the return on investment for this business would become unattractive.  



Another problem, besides possible punitive regulation in the U.K., is the weakness in the British Pound. The Morningstar analyst claims that a 10% movement in the currency will impact the fair value estimate by $3.

Possible Merger with Avangrid



There have been reports that PPL is or has been in merger discussions with Avangrid Inc. (AGR)



Avangrid has two primary businesses. "Avangrid Networks owns eight electric and natural gas utilities, serving more than 3.3 million customers in New York and New England. Avangrid Renewables owns and operates a portfolio of renewable energy generation facilities across the United States." 












Avangrid Renewables is part of  of the IBERDROLA Group, "one of the largest renewable asset bases of any company in the world, with more than 14,000 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy spread across a dozen countries." Avangrid Renewables "has more than $10 billion of operating assets totaling more than 6,000 MW of owned and controlled wind and solar generation in more than 20 states."About Us

The merger makes sense to me provided the terms make sense. I have not seen any reports discussing this possible merger since 11/5/19. 
PPL remains tight-lipped on possible merger with Avangrid - The Morning Call  



Broker Reports:

Morningstar (11/5/19): 2 stars with a $33.31 fair value


Argus (10/4/19): Buy with a $34 PT


S & P (11/12/19): 5 stars with a $37 PT


Goal: Low expectations; would define a victory as a 7+% total return, mostly derived from the dividend.  


2. Small Ball Adds


A. Bought 2 DUK at $86.55





Quote: Duke Energy Corp. (DUK)

Closing Price Yesterday: DUK $89.76 +$0.47 +0.53% 

DUK Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

SEC Filings 

Last DiscussedItem # 3.A. Bought 2 DUK at $87.94 and 3 at $87.65 (11/16/19 Post)Item # 5.A. Bought 10 DUK at $89.4 (9/1/19 Post)

With the last 2 share purchase, the average cost per share was reduced from $88.85 to $88.58.

I discussed the last earnings report in the 11/16 pots linked above.

Dividend: Quarterly at $.945 per share ($3.79 annually), raised from $.927 effective for the 2019 third quarter payment.

Last Ex Dividend Date: 11/14

Dividend Yield at TC4.28%

A recent significant stock offering has put downward pressure on the stock price. Prospectus

B. Bought 20 GCI at $6.27 and 10 at $6.15:

                            

Category: Lottery Ticket Basket Strategy


Major Bear Market-Waterfall stock chart


Some of the recent decline may be attributable to year end tax loss selling.  


Closing Price Yesterday: GCI $6.02 -$0.15 -2.43%

Current Position: 110 shares

Dividend Reinvestment: Yes as a means to average down

Average Cost per share = $6.96 






Since my last discussion, New Media completed its acquisition of Gannett (GCI)  and changed its name to Gannett and kept the Gannett stock symbol. My prior purchases were NEWM shares.  



Dividend: NEWM's dividend of $.38 be share will be cut in half to $.19 based on representations made by that company in merger related documents. It remains to be seen how long the dividend will be maintained at that level. 

Assuming no change, the dividend yield at a $6.96 per share total cost is 10.92%.  

As I discussed earlier, the Stock Jocks do not believe in the projections made by NEWM's management before the merger; which judgment is reflected in the persistent price decline since the merger was announced. Pessimism about the future of print media is justified, but probably overdone IMO at GCI's current price.  

Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule


Maximum Position: Yet to be determined


C. Added 10 PFXF at $19.8




Quote: VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF

Closing Price Yesterday: PFXF $19.85 $0.01 +0.05% 

Current Position: 110 Shares


I have nothing to add to my recent discussion: Item # 1: Bought 100 PFXF at $20.06  (12/4/19 Post)


D. Added $100 to PRPFX at $39.66



Quote: Permanent Portfolio Overview

Sponsor's Website: The Permanent Portfolio Family of Funds

SEC Filings

Last SEC Filed Shareholder ReportPeriod ending 7/31/19

Last Substantive DiscussionsItem # 4 (7/10/19 Post)Item # 2.B. (12/21/17 Post)


I just received the annual dividend:  



When a fund makes only an annual dividend payment, or an unusually large year end payment, I will frequently buy additional shares after the ex dividend date. 

PRPFX Realized Gains to Date: $898.7 + dividends (snapshots at Item # 4.C. and Item # 2.B)

PRPFX is my Financial Armageddon mutual fund given its allocations to U.S. treasuries, gold and silver bullion, high quality corporate bonds, real estate companies, and Swiss government bonds. 

3. Eliminations and Pares

A.  Eliminated CJREF Again: Sold 100 at $4.35:




Website: Corus Entertainment

Category: Lottery Ticket Basket Strategy

Dividends: Quarterly at C$.06 per share with a 12/17 ex dividend date

Profit Snapshot: +$61.58 



The long term chart suggests that staying around too long will not be productive.  


YTD Trading Profits: +$138.99

B. Eliminated IBB-Sold 5 at +$114.28


Profit Snapshot:  $72.05 (11/21 transaction only) 


C. Eliminated M-Sold 30 at $15.31



Quote: Macy's Inc.

M | Macy's Inc. Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

Closing Price Yesterday: M $15.15 +$0.04 +0.26% 


Profit Snapshot: $26.84  (received 1 dividend payment) 




I describe my common stock investment style as contrarian value. Or, another more descriptive summary is "bottom fisher and dumpster diver". 


This approach will lead me into stocks that are out-of-favor, frequently having charts that scream stay away. 


I was willing to nibble in Macy's common stock after selling one of its bonds. 


The last earnings report and the data breach caused me to exit the stock position. My reaction to both events was negative. The Stock Jocks took the negative developments in stride. I did not.      


Macy’s, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2019 EarningsUPDATE: Macy's shares slide after sales miss and lowered guidance as weather and soft tourism weigh - MarketWatch 


Macy's hack: Customer data stolen after retailer's online store was hacked - CBS News


I may consider another Lottery Ticket type buy in the $12 to $13 range.  


D. Eliminated IEMG-Sold 15 at $51.46:  




Quote: 
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF


Profit Snapshot: +$20.69 



Item # 5.B. Added 3 IEMG at $47.37 (8/28/19 Post);  Item # 4.B. Added 2 IEMG at $49.38  (6/8/19 Post)Item # 3.A. Bought 10 IEMG at $51.04 (4/7/19 Post)
Sponsor's website: 
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF


Expense Ratio: .14% 

E. Eliminated IEUR-Sold 14 at  at $47.82




Quote: iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF Overview


Profit Snapshot: +$31.69



Item # 5D. Bought 2 IEUR at $43.15 (8/28/19 Post)Item # 1.B. Bought 2 IEUR at $45(6/2/19 Post); Item # 5.A. Bought 10 IEUR at $46.16 (5/22/19 Post)

Sponsor's Website: iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF | IEUR


Expense Ratio: .1%


F. Eliminated SCHK-Sold 10 at $30.56





Quote: Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK)


Profit Snapshot: $28.05




Item # 3.C. Bought 10 SCHK at $27.76 (4/7/19 Post) Sponsor's Website: SCHK - Schwab 1000 Index® ETF


Expense Ratio: .05%


4. Canadian Reset Equity Preferred Stocks


A. Bought 50 HSEPRC:CA at C$16.57





Quote: Husky Energy Inc. 4.5% Cumulative Pfd. Series 3 Overview


Par Value: C$25


Issuer: Husky Energy Inc. (Canada: Toronto)


Prospectus Excerpt: 






Last Ex Dividend: 11/29/19 This payment was under the fixed coupon rate of 4.5%. I bought on 11/27. 


Reset Coupon: 4.636% ("sum of the Government of Canada five-year bond yield of 1.506% plus 3.13%", Husky Energy Provides Series 3 Preferred Shares Conversion Privilege Notice, Series 3 and Series 4 Preferred Shares Dividend Rate Notice)

The 4.636% coupon will remain in effect to, but excluding, 12/31/2024.

Current Yield at 4.636% Coupon and C$16.57 Price = 6.9946%

Resets: Starting on 12/31/19 and for five years thereafter, the coupon will reset at a 3.13% spread to the five year Canadian bond yield unless the issuer's exercises its optional redemption right on the reset date. 

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

13 comments:

  1. "needs to create about 107,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady,"

    So the numbers aren't more jobs created, just new jobs with the ended jobs not counted in. (Answers my question from the prior post.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: About 3.3 million persons will graduate from high school this year.

      https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372

      Most will be looking for jobs.

      Then there is a large number that drop out of school each year before graduating.

      Then you have the two and four college graduates each year and those graduating with advanced degrees.

      Then, there are discouraged older workers who reenter the labor force, looking for jobs.

      There are large numbers of workers who retire or die each year. People are living and working longer in the past.

      The number of new jobs that are necessary to keep unemployment stable is derived in significant part from population growth and the size of the labor force.

      The estimates made by economists on how many new jobs need to be created each month may be close but are best viewed as informed guesses. There are simply too many variables.

      Ultimately, the rise in unemployment will be triggered mostly from an economic contraction. Workers with jobs and near retirement may elect to continue working, new entrants will find it harder to find jobs as businesses lay off existing employees.

      The BLS numbers of new jobs has seasonal and non-seasonal adjustments based on an "establishment survey" which covers approximately "142,000 businesses and government agencies representing approximately 689,000 worksites throughout the United States."

      See "What is the CES Survey"
      https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesfaq.htm

      Over a year's period, the number with and without seasonal adjustments will be the same.

      The number of new jobs is the difference between the size of the nonfarm payroll in one month compared to the prior month. So this is a counting process. How many people are on the payroll when the survey is conducted.

      That number in isolation does not tell us how many new jobs need to be created to keep unemployment stable.

      Unemployment will generally be a coincident (or possibly a slightly lagging) indicator with expansions and contractions.

      https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2012/04/17/the-unemployment-rate-a-coincident-recession-indicator

      Growth in jobs may be slowing down from peak levels before a recession but the numbers generally do not turn negative until the recession is underway.

      I would add a caveat. I have zero training in labor economics but I do look at the data and make what I would just call common sense type observations based on the past.

      The main takeaways IMO are (1) the numbers are guesses based on surveys and sampling techniques and will be revised; (2) it is better to have both the ADP and the BLS data close which provides more reliability for the guesses; (3) when the ADP and BLS numbers diverge considerably as they did for November, the reliability goes down; and (4) the focus needs to be on the big picture about how the jobs data fits into all other material economic data. The big question is whether the economy is currently in an expansion or contraction mode. The answer to that question now is expansion.

      Delete
    2. That explains it all better on how the numbers work and why replacement is needed.

      That does seem like a lot of guessing in the end. So not useful if the economy is so-so at telling how so-so or not. More generally useful numbers.

      Delete
  2. Kudlow cautioned that Donald was willing to "walk away" if some conditions are not met."

    That may be Trump's out. He'll walk away and claim he's made a strong stand for team USA, and will need another term to break the deep China issue caused by (insert something blaming dems based on no history at all... and possibly not in English like his orange lightbulb soliloquy.)

    On Macy's I'll say it's nearly the only store left in it's particular class - middle to upper middle not really junk. Everything else is better or lower.

    The question going around is whether the house should put in items from the Mueller report or keep things shorter.

    I think do more, but also slow this down & figure out some other sneaky things Trump's doing. Find one more, and he'd be toast. Do it later separately, it is won't matter...again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: We will know soon enough Donald's political calculation on a trade deal with China. He is not going to get anything IMO that is material to the U.S. economy.

      Perhaps China will agree to buy more farm products, for example, that may even gradually return to the levels in existence prior to the trade war.

      His options include (1) postponing again the new tariffs scheduled to go into effect on 12/15 (original data was in September as I recall), claiming that progress is being made in the negotiations; (2) breaking off negotiations and accelerating the trade war with new tariffs and no roll back of existing ones; and (3) accepting whatever China is willing to offer and calling it the best trade deal ever negotiated in the universe's history with no new tariffs and a rollback of some existing ones.

      The path taken IMO will be determined by Donald's calculus at a particular moment in time about how each option impacts his reelection chances.

      After starting a trade war that has lasted already about 18 months, he does not want to be seen by his base as coming up with nothing that will materially benefit the U.S. economy or farmers in particular who are key to his reelection in several battleground states.

      Unlike the Trumpsters who believe Donald is a business genius and a skilled negotiator, I view his history as proving the opposite with one caveat. He has been adept in negotiating his way out of taking full responsibility for the fiascos and blunders that he created through the exercise of extremely bad judgment.

      Delete
  3. Jobs needed for new entrants in order to keep growth happening rather than unemployment... that makes sense.

    So wage growth looks good, but is coming off a decline.

    Is employment a concurrent or trailing indicator? I remember it as not being a leading indicator.

    With the inversion, any conclusions on whether it was a real indicator this time, or whether this time was different?

    With the trade stuff, at least if Trump concludes he did the amazing by making no deal, he will stop the doing the trade war that he has been. It's a start at not trashing the economy before the next election. Though if it takes a recession...

    Are any of your reps persuadable? Do they know where you stand on this? I'm not trying to do rallies, but now I'm somehow the seasoned person giving advice to the person who assisted me before. If I'm seasoned, turtles are fast.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm going to write off the trading issues as causing more havoc. I'm guessing Trump will go with doing the least possible, while claiming big success.

    He doesn't need the farmers. According to journalists, when interviewed, those same farmers who say tariffs hurt them, they also can't bring themselves to say they won't vote for Trump.

    If there are bumps from say his 12/15 actions, i'll buy. They won't last.

    So employment isn't very meaningful. Question is how consumer spending is doing. Manufacturing has already contracted but just barely. Last I hear a week ago, consumer confidence was down a tad. But then black friday numbers were quite good. Not good for brick stores, but online was good, and an increase over last year or at least the announcer seemed happy about the numbers (I was in the car and not fully listening.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Macy's, Inc. (M)
    $15.00 -$0.15 (-0.99%)
    As of 9:57AM E
    Volume 7,134,778
    Avg. Volume 15,529,090
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/M?p=M

    I discussed Macy's in this post. Item # 3.C.

    Today, GS issued a sell recommendation based on the negative forecast made by the company, which I briefly mentioned:

    https://www.thestreet.com/investing/macys-slides-after-goldman-lowers-rating-to-sell-following-2019-guidance-cut

    I noted that the Stock Jocks barely reacted to the guidance cut and other negative news including the data breach. And, the stock is barely reacting today to the GS sell recommendation.

    This can indicate that the stock is already washed out to the downside and the problematic guidance was already priced into the stock. Or, whoever is buying the stock and propping up the price in spite of the negative developments is delusional. Hard to say which is closer to reality.

    One key factor for owning Macy's stock at the current depressed level, compared to its history, is the dividend and whether it will be cut. Eventually, with recent trends continuing, the dividend will have to be cut, but it is covered now with free cash flow as I recall.

    The yield at the current price is about 10%.

    I would emphasize again that dividend yields are less important than total return IMO. It does not help that an investor is receiving a 10% dividend with an average annual loss in the share price of 10%.

    The 5 year annual average total return for Macy's (which includes dividend reinvestment) is -5.86%.

    https://www.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/

    That is not going to pay for your nursing home expenses.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stock futures were down after the South China Post reported that a Phase 1 deal was unlikely before 12/15.

    The negative slide was reversed, with stock futures now pointing higher, after the WSJ reported that China and the U.S. were working now on a delaying those new tariffs.

    I am not going to allow Donald to jerk my chain on his trade negotiation machinations. I am in a defensive posture already, defined in part by hyper trading and increases in cash reserves, and that is not going to change unless and until there is a catastrophic decline in stocks and/or a major spike in interest rates that make high quality, intermediate term corporate bonds more attractive as total return vehicles.

    I strongly recommend watching at least the first 20 minutes of this interview with Jeffrey Gundlach:

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeffrey-gundlach-on-outlook-for-2020-decade-182455166.html

    It is extremely rare that I find myself in agreement with every material point made over 20 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No deal. Delayed tariffs. Nothing much happening. But when the market figures that out, it will rally at the ...success.

      At least with this, I knew what happened this morning.

      Will catch up on the video later. What I've watched so far... points to being cautious when buying not to exceed valuation.

      Delete
    2. Good video. I'll have to listen to it again.

      Some of what he says is intutive once he says it. Like the cycle through Japan, Europe, Emerging markets... all could do no wrong, then never getting back to prior levels. It's been one of those unconscious (for me) underlying worries of why this recovery has worry lines, as it climbs up.

      Delete
  7. Enbridge Inc. (ENB)
    $39.25 +$0.45 (+1.15%)
    As of 10:41AM EST
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ENB/press-releases?p=ENB

    The rise today is attributable to ENB announcing a 9.8% increase in its dividend. The new quarterly rate will be C$.81 per share.

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/enbridge-increases-dividend-by-9-8-announces-2020-financial-guidance-and-provides-update-on-strategic-priorities-300971774.html

    Forward Guidance:
    "Enbridge provided updated guidance for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for 2020 of approximately $13.7 billion and an updated guidance range of distributable cash flow per share (DCF/share) for 2020 of $4.50 to $4.80 per share."

    I am down to 48+ shares with a $34.13 average cost per share. While I have been reinvesting the dividend, I just turned that option off.

    My lowest cost was purchased at $29.95 (3/20/18). The highest cost lot, other than shares purchased with dividends, was bought at $36.46 (10 shares on 1/31/18). That will be the next lot sold.

    I will be discussing in my next post a 100 share purchase of Pembina Pipeline (PBA), another Canadian energy infrastructure company, at $34.34 on 12/3.

    Both PBA and ENB are regular corporations rather than MLPs and are traded on the NYSE. PBA pays dividends monthly.

    The U.S.D. priced shares for both companies will reflect the prices in Toronto as converted into USDs. So I want the CAD to rise in value after purchasing PBA. Possibly, the conclusion of the NAFTA 1.01 trade agreement, when and if that occurs, will bolster the CAD. There appears to be some progress in reaching that goal.

    CAD/USD
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/currency/cadusd

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/12/fieca-gnl-hseprcca-icln-mgc-pba-vht-vwo.html

    ReplyDelete