Dollar Value of Purchases Discussed in this Post:
Corporate Bonds and Treasury Bills: +$29,000 in principal amount
Common Stocks/Stock Funds: +$929.01
I am back into a hibernation mode for stock purchases and will not be purchasing any stocks next week. Consequently, I will not have a blog post next week unless I start selling stocks and/or stock funds.
I will start to reduce my stock allocation some when the VIX returns to below 20 movement and the sales price for whatever is sold is higher than the closing price on 2/19/25 when the S&P 500 hit its all time high.
I will generally own between 200 and 250 individual common stocks and several stock funds (mutual, CEFs, ETFs).
My largest stock fund position is PRWCX. T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund| Morningstar I have been selling shares. Item # 1.A Sold 100 PRWCX at $34.98 (3/18/25 Post)(reducing position to the currently owned 843+ shares); Item # 1 Sold 50 out of 1,003+ PRWCX at $35.66 (2/5/25 Post), Item # 1.A. Sold 50 PRWCX at $38.94 (11/14/24 Post)
The second largest fund position is PRPFX, classified as a moderate allocation mutual fund which maintains close to a 25% allocation in gold and silver bullion: Permanent Portfolio Permanent "I" Fund| Morningstar.
| Price as of 5/8/25 Close |
For both PRPFX and PRWCX, I have been taking all dividends in cash. PRPFX Stock Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha; PRWCX Stock Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha
Paul Tudor Jones says stock market will hit new lows even if Trump cuts China tariffs to 50% A cut to 50% from 145% or higher for some products is not a positive development since most trade subject to the 50% tariffs would cease. Possibly some products will be shipped but the U.S. importer would hike prices to U.S. consumers and demand would decline as a result. If China reduced its tariffs to 50% on U.S. exports (e.g. pork or soybeans), Chinese importers would simply source the purchase from non-U.S. sources.
On 5/8/25, Trump recommended that investors "better go out and buy stock now. Let me tell you, this country will be like a rocket ship that goes straight up". The S&P 500 closed at 5,663.94 on 5/8/25.
+++
Fed Policy Statement 5/7/25: "Uncertainty about the economic outlook has increased further. The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate and judges that the risks of higher unemployment and higher inflation have risen." Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement That is the stagflation scenario: lower growth/higher inflation.
Trump responded by calling Powell a "fool" even though the FED statement quoted above was approved by all FED members with no dissents.
When making that remark, Trump also falsely claimed that grocery prices had fallen. Steve Rattner: Groceries went up faster under Trump than Biden - YouTube
The BLS price data shows increases in grocery prices. Table 2. Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U): U. S. city average, by detailed expenditure category - 2025 M03 Results
The FED statement did result in a lower probability for a June rate cut:
| 17.2% Probability of a .25% cut |
If a recession develops later this year, the FED will probably cut rates when that is confirmed by the data, even if inflation is moving higher and notwithstanding the FED's stated concern about stagflation.
***
U.K. - U.S. Framework for a Trade Deal:
This development has created optimism among many investors that everything is going to be okay. IMO, it is far too early to form that opinion.
Trump hails framework of U.K. trade deal, but 10% tariffs will remain on some items - CBS News; US and UK agree deal slashing Trump tariffs on cars and metals ("The U.S. ran a $11.9 billion trade surplus in goods with the U.K. last year, according to the Census Bureau. The $68 billion in goods that the U.S. imported from the U.K. last year accounted for just 2% of all" goods imported into the U.S.)
United Kingdom | United States Trade Representative:
This is a framework for a trade agreement with many details remaining to be worked out. It is not a trade deal since nothing has been signed. Based on several comments made by those involved in the negotiation and in news articles, there appears to be areas of disagreement and major issues still need to be ironed out (e.g. pharmaceuticals, steel). UK-US tariff deal: Cars, steel and beef - what you need to know- BBC; What's in the US-UK trade framework announced by Trump? - ABC News
Trump imposed earlier this year a 25% tariff on all steel imports claiming that he had the authority under a law that authorized the President to take actions to protect national security. The US Will Expand Existing Section 232 ‘National Security’ Duties on Imports of Steel and Aluminum Products Effective March 12, 2025 | BakerHostetler
The framework for a trade deal removes the tariff on British steel exports, but then there would be a quota on the "most favoured nation rates for UK steel and aluminium and certain derivative steel and aluminium products."
As noted in the BBC article, it is unclear whether the parties have agreed on the quota and whether the tariff will apply to steel derivative products. If steel tariffs can be removed as part of a trade deal, then was there ever a national security threat arising from steel exports to the U.S.? Trump's national security justification for imposing the 25% steel and aluminum tariffs on exports from the U.K., Canada and Mexico was 100% bogus and remains so.
Since the U.S. had a trade surplus with the U.K. last year, I view the framework for a trade deal as announced to reflect somewhat unfavorably on Starmer's negotiating skills, but then the U.K. is in a less than optimal negotiating position given Brexit.
The question is whether a better deal for the U.K. would have resulted from immediately implementing retaliatory tariffs on all U.S. exports equal in dollar amount to the U.S. tariffs. Starmer refused to say whether the U.K. is worse off with this deal. Starmer-The Guardian
It is my understanding that the British Parliament does not currently have the authority to vote on a trade deal. Treaty-making and parliamentary scrutiny: recent developments
In a democracy, the legislative branch should have the right to approve a trade treaty, but allowing votes on amendments to the negotiated draft would probably be unwise. Just an up or down vote on the final version negotiated by a PM/President.
The Tory leader claimed that Starmer had shafted the U.K. which is hyperbole, the common language of politicians.
+++
Trump says 10% is floor for tariffs; 'Some will be much higher' This will be inflationary.
At the request of the U.S. according to China and at China's request according to Trump, China and the U.S. will discuss this weekend trade and other economic issues in Switzerland. China beefs up economic safeguards ahead of U.S. trade talks in Switzerland | CBC News
China to cut key rates by 10 points, bank reserve requirement by 50 points in bid to boost economy
U.S. oil production will start to decline due to price plunge, Diamondback CEO warns
The Real Measure of Trump’s Tariff Mess - The Atlantic (subscription publication)
Trump China tariffs hit wedding dresses and bridal shops
Ford hikes prices on Mexico-produced models, citing tariffs
Egg lovers can’t get a break. Vital Farms to raise prices because of tariffs. - MarketWatch (subscription publication) The price increase will be at least 10% and is related to tariffs on steel and other products. Trump placed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports.
Trump says he will blame Biden for 2nd Quarter GDP, provided the result is bad. He previously said that the good numbers for the first quarter were due to his actions and all the bad numbers were Biden's responsibility.
Barbie-maker Mattel pulls forecasts, to hike US prices as tariffs raise costs | Reuters
Fact check: Trump makes more false claims about Canada in advance of meeting with prime minister; Daniel Dale fact-checks Trump’s meeting with Canadian prime minister - YouTube
How soon defaulted student loan borrowers may face collections Trump intends to garnish the wages of 5.3 million defaulted student loan borrowers starting this summer. This will reduce their consumer spending when and if implemented by Trump.
‘Funny way to treat your friends’: Republicans miffed with Trump’s threats to ignore funding - POLITICO There are some republicans who do not support Trump impounding funds appropriated by Congress pursuant to laws signed by prior Presidents. Those impoundments are like a line item veto without having to veto anything. Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998)(line item veto unconstitutional). When impounding funds, Trump has ignored The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 as well as the Supreme Court's decision in Train v. City of New York, 420 U.S. 35 (1975).
+++
Trump, asked if he has to 'uphold the Constitution,' says, 'I don't know'
6 noteworthy moments from Trump's "Meet the Press" interview; Trump’s Latest Interview Should FREAK YOU OUT - YouTube
Harvard University refused to bend a knee to Trump, and this is what happens when a university fails to obey: Trump says the government will revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status. The university’s president says that would be illegal; Trump administration to halt new federal research grants for Harvard as battle over political ideology and academic freedom flares It is "illegal" of course, but only in a nation governed by laws rather than one where a dictator can mete out punishment by executive order to anyone who refuses to obey.
Trump's Education Secretary mocked after critics spot embarrassing grammatical errors in threatening letter to Harvard | Daily Mail Online She is barely literate. Her letter, possibly written in part by Trump given the use of all cap letters, does confirm the real reasons behind Trump's assault on Ivy League colleges. Trump Finally Drops the Anti-Semitism Pretext - The Atlantic (subscription publication) Other reasons IMO include (1) a strong animus toward intelligent and informed people who are not easily manipulated with false information and narratives, (2) a desire to neuter all opposition forces and (3) as part of Trump's extensive effort to concentrate power in his hands through using the Presidency to coerce institutions and people to obey his orders and bend to his will.
The U.S. is currently in a one man dictatorship as a practical matter, and will continue along that path until and unless the republican Supreme Court Justices decide to restrain our Dear Leader from violating laws and the Constitution. No restraint will happen in the republican controlled House or Senate.
That leaves the courts. While lower courts have restrained so far clearly dictatorial and unconstitutional actions by Trump, it remains to be seen whether those restraints will be removed or modified by the Republican Supreme Court Justices.
So far, those Justices have provided a clear pathway for dictatorial rule by an Imperial President, primarily through creating a broad immunity from criminal prosecution, unleashing Trump and creating incentives for him to commit crimes, violate the law, concentrate even more power in his hands and flagrantly violate constitutional rights. It needs to be remembered that the broad immunity was created by those Justices in response to actions taken by Trump to seize power after losing an election.
Trump budget proposes $1 trillion for defense, slashes education, foreign aid, environment, health and public assistance This is just another confirmation about the priorities of Trump's party.
Trump family could make hundreds of millions from Abu Dhabi crypto investment; Trump's Middle East business surge prompts conflict of interest attacks from critics - Newsweek
How law firms targeted by Trump are responding to White House pressure | 60 Minutes - YouTube
Judge rules Trump executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional as violating the 1st, 5th and 6th Amendments to the Constitution- CBS News; Decision - 102 pages .pdf The Federal District Court granted the Perkins Coie law firm a summary judgment and issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the enforcement of Trump's Executive Order 142230 that targeted this law firm and its lawyers - past, present and future.
Trump is risking a ruling by the Supreme Court, joined in by a least 2 Republican Justices, that he has blatantly violated the 1st, 5th and 6th Amendments with his EOs targeting law firms. I regard those EOs as impeachable offenses for any President regardless of party.
As a reminder, Trump demands that these firms provide up to $100M in free legal services to whomever Trump chooses as protection money or Trump will use the government destroy their livelihoods
(1) by taking away all security clearances,
(2) denying the firm's lawyers access to all federal buildings including federal courthouses,
(3) preventing the firm from being hired by any federal agency,
(4) preventing a federal agency from hiring any of the firm's past, present or future lawyers, and
(5) requiring federal contractors to state whether or not the firm provides any legal representation to those contractors with the clear implication being that the contractors would lose federal government business by hiring the firm or continuing an attorney client relationship.
One reason for these extortion efforts is to severely punish entire law firms when one or more of his past or present lawyers represented a client that Trump does not like, was involved in litigation against Trump or advanced a position opposed by Trump on behalf of a client.
Another reason is to silence potential critics and to prevent firms from even taking on clients whose causes are opposed by Trump and his party.
Trump is trying to chill the investigative journalism that holds him to account Everyone who voted for Trump knew or is presumed to have known that the he is an ignorant authoritarian demagogue that would use the Presidency to enrich himself and his family. George Conway made a similar observation soon after the election in this article: America Did This to Itself - The Atlantic (subscription publication) Receiving more information about Trump exercising authoritarian powers will not be criticized by those voters, but embraced by them and cheered by almost all republican politicians. It is what they want.
Trump administration in talks with Rwanda to take deportees from U.S. - CBS News
U.S. seeking deportation deals with far-flung countries like Angola and Equatorial Guinea - CBS News
Trump posts AI image of himself as pope, leaving Catholics offended and unamused as conclave nears
NPR and PBS to challenge Trump over public funding cuts
Trump Tells Hate Leader And J6 Seditionist 'I Love You Guys' At Mar-A-Lago: Report; Trump Reportedly Told January 6 Militant and Hate Leader “I Love You” | The New Republic Trump said he just loved the Proud Boys. The Proud Boys | Program on Extremism | The George Washington University
WATCH: Trump suggests he wants to reopen Alcatraz because it’s the ultimate symbol of law and order - YouTube it is important to listen to him rant. The prison was closed in 1963 because it was then far too expensive to maintain and operate. Is Donald Trump's plan to reopen Alcatraz as a prison realistic?
CBO: Millions could lose coverage if GOP pulls back on Medicaid expansion - -POLITICO
Anne Applebaum and the Most Corrupt Presidency in American History | The David Frum Show - YouTube
Trump's Grift Machine - YouTube
MAGA outlet OAN to provide content for hollowed-out Voice of America, says Kari Lake
New Pope Leo XIV Bashed Trump and JD Vance on Twitter Just Weeks Ago; The New Pope Doesn’t Seem to Be a Huge Fan of Trump or JD Vance | The New Republic; MAGA melts down over ‘WOKE MARXIST POPE’ who is a ‘Never Trumper liberal’ | The Independent
As overdose deaths fall, Trump administration proposes cuts to lifesaving Narcan program - CBS News
+++++
1. Small Ball Stock Purchases:
A. Added 10 DOC at $17.3 - Schwab Account:
Quote: Healthpeak Properties Inc. (DOC)
Cost $173
New Average cost per share: $17.55 (60 shares)
Dividend: Monthly at $.1017 per share ($1.22 annually)
DOC Stock Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha
Yield at $17.55: 6.95%
Next Ex Dividend: 5/19/25
Last Earnings Report (3/31/25): I discuss this report in my last post and have nothing further to add here. Item # 1.B. Started DOC in Schwab Account - Bought 50 at $17.61 (5/2/25 Post);
SEC Filed Press Release and Supplemental
B. Added 5 CAG at $23.73; 5 at $22.95 - Schwab Account:
Quote: Conagra Brands Inc. (CAG)
Cost: $233.38
Investment Categories: Bond Substitute/Contrarian Value
CAG Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch I believe these estimates use non-GAAP E.P.S. numbers.
CAG SEC Filed Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending 5/26/24
Brands | Conagra Brands (Includes Birds Eye (frozen vegetables), Hunts (ketchup), PAM, Orville Redenbacher (popcorn), Vlasic (pickles), Reddi-Whip, Slim Jim, Healthy Choice, Marie Callenders, Smart Balance, Mrs. Paul's, Banquet, Angie's, Swiss Miss, Log Cabin and Mrs. Butterworth (syrups), Van Camp's (various beans), Wish-Bone (dressings & vinaigrettes), Duncan Hines, and Libby's)
Recent News: Conagra Brands Enters Into Definitive Agreement with Hometown Food Company, a Brynwood Partners Portfolio Company, to Divest the Chef Boyardee® Brand (5/1/25) The sales price is $600M in cash. CAG intends to use the proceeds to pay down debt. "The Chef Boyardee products that are part of the transaction contributed approximately $450 million USD to Conagra's fiscal year 2024 net sales." If the transaction had been concluded at the start of fiscal year 2025, CAG estimates that the deal would be 4% dilutive to E.P.S. for the year excluding transaction costs and other one time impacts. The announcement was made prior to the opening on 5/1. The closed that day at $24.18, down $.53 and fell another $.32 the next trading day.
Two Year Chart: Strong Bear Market Trend, though there is a possible double bottom forming near $23
What Are Double Bottom Patterns?
There are rational reasons why the bad news may be priced into the stock at a $23 price. While earnings growth is almost non-existent, using non-GAAP E.P.S., the P/E multiple using trailing 12 month non-GAAP E.P.S. or estimated E.P.S. for the next 4 quarters is less than 10 with a dividend yield at 6.09% at $23. As of 5/8/25, the average non-GAAP E.P.S. estimate is $2.71 for the fiscal year ending in May 2026.
Last Discussed: Item # 1.A. Added 5 CAG at $24.71 (2/10/25 Post)
Last Sell Discussion: Item # 2.H. Sold 5 CAG at $33.07 (9/12/24 Post)
New Average cost per share: $26.8 (89+ shares)
Dividend: Quarterly at $.35 per share ($1.4 annually)
CAG Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha
I am currently reinvesting the dividend as a means to average down randomly.
Yield at $26.8: 5.22%
Last Ex Dividend: 4/28/25
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 2/23/25): This was for the third fiscal quarter.
SEC Filed Earnings Press Release
There is nothing positive in this report.
GAAP E.P.S. = $.3, down from $.64
Adjusted E.P.S. = $.51, down from $.69
Consensus per Schwab at $.53
Reconciliation:
Revenues: $2.841B, down from $3.0329B
Fiscal 2025 Adjusted E.P.S. Guidance: $2.35, unchanged.
Maximum Position: 100 shares
Analyst Reports (available to Schwab customers):
Morningstar (4/25/25): 4 stars with a fair value estimate of $28.5
S&P (4/3/25): 3 stars with a 12 month PT of $28.
I do not have access to a J.P. Morgan report, published on 5/6/25, that lowered the PT to $25 from $26 and maintained a neutral rating.
My consider to eliminate: >$30
A greater than $30 stock price is highly unlikely IMO within the next year.
SU Bonds: I own 2 Conagra 4.6% SU that mature on 11/1/25 that were bought at a total cost of $98.44. Bond Page | FINRA.org
C. Added 10 ACCO at $3.67; 20 at $3.5 - Schwab Account:
Quote: ACCO Brands Corp. (ACCO)
Cost: $106.7
ACCO Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch As of 5/2/25, with two analyst providing estimates, the consensus adjusted E.P.S. for 2025 was $1.04 and $1.2 in 2026. The current share price reflects considerably more pessimism about the future, based at least in part IMO, on a long term decline in annual revenues.
Website: ACCO Brands
10-K at page 1.
10-Q for the Q/E 3/31/25 Debt is listed at page 11.
ACCO 2024 SEC Filed Annual Report Adjusted E.P.S. of $1.06 which excludes a significant non-cash impairment charge, down slightly from an adjusted E.P.S. of $1.09 in 2023.
Investment Category: Lottery Ticket Basket Strategy
For those new to reading my posts, the Lottery Ticket category and its subcategory of Blackjack Hand refer to buying shares that have been justifiably smashed in price but possibly by too much IMO.
There is at least a rational basis for forming an opinion that a recovery is possible for stocks so classified, which may or may not actually happen. The category will include stocks that pay no dividends.
Using the terms Blackjack Hand and Lottery Ticket are meant to convey the high risk of a loss.
I use to provide snapshots of profits and losses in this category: Lottery Ticket Basket Strategy: New Gateway Post I quit doing that in 2015 with the snapshots showing a net profit of $14,012.42 as of October 2015 with a 2009 start year. Note the large number of lottery ticket losses included in that post. This is a form of entertainment for me and is an alternative to playing blackjack at a casino.
Some of the realized gains included in that post are in REIT common and preferred stocks during the 2009-2013 time period which was prior to the 9/2013 start of my Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy.
New Average cost per share: $4.37 (80 shares)
Dividend: Quarterly at $.075 per share ($.30 annually)
Yield at $4.37: 6.865%
Next Ex Dividend: 5/23/25
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/31/25): This was an unfavorable report and caused a decline in the stock price.
SEC Filed Earnings Press Release
GAAP E.P.S. ($.14)
Adjusted E.P.S. ($.02), down from $.03.
Reconciliation:
Net sales were reported at $317.4M, down 11.6%
Net debt was reduced by $35M.
Free cash flow: $3.3M, down from $25.9M
"In the second quarter, the Company expects reported sales to be down in a range of 8.0% to 12.0% and adjusted EPS within a range of $0.28 to $0.32. Second quarter outlook reflects changing customer buying patterns in response to the U.S. tariff situation and a cautious view of near-term demand implications."
A dividend slash or elimination is possible IMO.
Maximum Position: 100 shares
Previous Sell: 10 shares at $6.46
Last Buy Discussion: Item # 2.E. Added to ACCO - Bought 10 at $4.95; 20 at $4.78 - Schwab Account (11/11/23 Post)
D. Restarted HZO - Bought 2 at $22.24; 1 at $21.95; 1 at $21.17 - Schwab Account:
Quote: MarineMax Inc. (HZO)
Cost: $87.6
52 week range: $16.85 - $38.2
Website: MarineMax | New & Used Boat Dealer In The USA | Boat Dealerships, Marinas, Service, & More
HZO believes that it is the "world's largest "recreational boat, yacht and superyacht services company" with "over
"Through Fraser Yachts and Northrop & Johnson, we believe we are the largest superyacht services provider, operating locations across the globe. Cruisers Yachts manufactures boats and yachts with sales through our select retail dealership locations and through independent dealers. Additionally, Intrepid Powerboats manufactures powerboats and sells through our retail dealership locations. MarineMax provides finance and insurance services through wholly owned subsidiaries and operates MarineMax Vacations in Tortola, British Virgin Islands." 10-Q for the Q/E 3/31/25 at page 8 (debt discussed at pages 16-17).
Investment Category: Lottery Ticket Basket Strategy
Last Elimination: Item # 3.A. Eliminated HZO - Sold 11 at $42.29 (8/5/23 Post)(profit snapshot = $50.67)
Based on unfavorable operating results that have accelerated since my last elimination, I have downgraded this stock to a Lottery Ticket.
HZO Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch As of 5/2/25, the consensus E.P.S. estimate has E.P.S. bottoming in the 2025 fiscal year at $1.87 and rising to $3.58 in the 2026 fiscal year.
E.P.S. peaked in F/Y ending 9/22 at $8.84, adjusted to $9, up from a GAAP E.P.S. of $6.78 in the 2021 fiscal year. SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the 4th Fiscal Quarter ending 9/30/22 The stock price peaked near $66 in May 2021. There was initially a decline in the stock price during the early stages of the pandemic in March-April 2020 with the stock hitting a low at $7.25, followed by a parabolic rise to a $65.79 high on 5/3/21.
Average cost per share: $21.9 (4 shares)
Dividends: None and none expected
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/31/25): This is the second fiscal quarter.
Revenue: $631.515M
Diluted E.P.S. $.14, up from $.07
Diluted E.P.S. 6 months: $.91, up from $.11
Adjusted E.P.S. = $.23, up from $.18
Adjusted E.P.S. 6 months: $.34, down from $.42
Reconciliation:
I do not see a turnaround in this financial data yet.
Earnings trend higher in the 3rd fiscal quarter. For the third F/Q ending on 6/30/24, the company reported E.P.S. of $1.37, adjusted to $1.51. SEC Filing The 2024 4th fiscal quarter was negatively impacted by hurricanes Helene and Milton. SEC Filing
E. Added 2 CPB at $35.2 - Schwab Account:
Quote: Campbell's Co. (CPB)
Cost: $70.4
52 Week High: $52.81
CPB Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch
Products - The Campbell's Company
Chart: Major bear market pattern
Packaged food stocks are in bear markets of an unknowable duration.
New average cost per share: $37.61 (25+ shares)
Dividend: Quarterly at $.39 per share ($1.56 annually)
CPB Stock Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha
Yield at $37.61: 4.148%
Last Ex Dividend: 4/3/25
Last Discussed: Item # 1.H. Added 5 CPB at $36.76; 5 at $36 (4/15/25 Post)
Last Earnings Report (F/Q ending 1/26/25): I discussed this report in a recent post and have nothing further to add here. Item # 1.P. Added 1 CPB at $37.13 (4/13/25 Post); SEC Filed Press Release
CPB Realized Gains to Date: $919.04
Most of that gain was realized in 2010: Item # 3 Sold 70 CPB at $35.79 (9/8/2010 Post)(profit snapshot = $714.84)
F. Bought 5 RYLD at $14.62 - Schwab Account:
Cost: $73.09
Investment Category: Monthly Income Generation
Sponsor's website: Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
Last Discussed: Item # 1.G. Eliminated Duplicate Position in RYLD - Sold 34+ at $16.65 - Fidelity Account and Item #1.H. Eliminated Duplicate Position in RYLD - Sold 40 at $16.65 - Vanguard Account (2/10/25 Post)(profit snapshots = $101.16)
New Average cost per share = $15.26 (70+ shares)
Dividend: Monthly at a variable rate
The last two dividend payments were lower than the others. I do not know the cause but it may have something to do with the market's decline during those months.
Last 12 Dividends (through April 2025): $1.9346
Yield Using $1.9346 and $15.26 AC per share: 12.68%
Next Ex Dividend: 5/19/25
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF-Morningstar - Currently rated 2 stars. Historical performance has been poor. This fund has proven to be an unsatisfactory long term hold. Consequently, I try to trade the shares for small profits after ROC adjustments to the tax cost basis.
G. Added 5 QYLD at $16.39 - Schwab Account:
Quote: Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF Overview - Buy/Write ETF
Cost: $81.93
Investment Category: Monthly Income Generation
Last Discussed: Item # 1.F. Eliminated Duplicate QYLD Position - Sold 40 at $18.59 (2/10/25 Post)(profit snapshot = $73.69); Item # 2. Eliminated Duplicate QYLD Position - Sold 30 at $17.97 .(3/15/24 Post)(profit snapshot = $62.03)
Sponsor's website: Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
New Average cost per share: $16.62 (77+ shares)
Dividend: Monthly at a variable rate
The last payment was a capital gain distribution.
Last 12 Dividends: $2.25353 per share
Yield at $16.62 Using $2.25 = 13.54%
Next Ex Dividend: 5/19/25
2024 Tax Classifications:
2024 Total = $2.27723 per share
Ordinary Income = $1.9836 per share
Short Term Capital Gain: $.33863 per share
NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | Morningstar (currently rated 3 stars)
H. Added 5 AMCR at $9.2 - Schwab Account:
Quote: Amcor PLC (AMCR) - Major Packaging Company
Cost: $45.98
Website: Global Packaging Solutions | Amcor
Recent News: Amcor completes combination with Berry Global (4/30/25) "In fiscal 2026, before taking into account growth in the underlying business, Amcor expects delivery of $260 million of pre-tax synergies alone to drive adjusted EPS accretion of approximately 12 percent. By the end of fiscal 2028, the company expects total pre-tax synergy benefits to build to approximately $650 million and to have delivered an additional $280 million one-time cash benefits from working capital improvements. Including full run rate synergies, annual cash flow is expected to exceed $3 billion by fiscal 2028."
Last Discussed: Item # 2.G. Added 10 AMCR at $9 (4/26/24 Post); Item # 1.B. Added to AMCR - Bought 5 at $8.95; 5 at $8.75; 5 at $8.59 (10/21/23 Post)
Last Elimination: Item # 5.G. Eliminated AMCR in 2 Taxable Accounts - Sold 20 at $12.05 and 10+ at $12.03 (1/23/23 Post)(profit snapshots. = $26.03)
New Average cost per share: $10.17 (115 shares)
Dividend: Quarterly at $.1275 per share ($.51 annually)
AMCR Stock Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha
Yield at $10.17: 5.015%
Next Ex Dividend: 5/22/25
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/31/25): SEC Filed Press Release and SEC Filed Slide Presentation This is for the third fiscal quarter.
Net Sales: $3.333B
E.P.S. $.136
Adjusted E.P.S. $.18, up 5% on comparable currency basis.
Reconciliation: The primary add backs are expenses relating to the Berry acquisition, now completed, and amortization of intangibles which is a non-cash expense.
2025 Adjusted E.P.S. Guidance: $.72-$.74 with free cash flow of $900M to $1B.
I. Restarted BOTZ - Bought 2 at $28.47 - Schwab Account:
Recent History this Account
Quote: Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Last Elimination: Item # 1.G. Eliminated BOTZ - Sold 10 at $33.28 (11/14/24 Post)(profit snapshot = $30.14)
Sponsor's website: Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ)
Expense Ratio: .68% (too high IMO)
Top 10 Holdings as of 3/7/25:
BOTZ – Portfolio: Morningstar (Lists top 25 holdings)
Dividend: Meaningless. Only one payment was made last year and that was for $.04+ per share.
The general idea is to buy back the 10 shares sold at $33.28 provided each purchase is at the lowest price in the chain.
Previous Sell Discussions: Item # 1.B. Eliminated BOTZ - Sold 9 at $26.53 (5/20/23 Post)(profit snapshot = $15.39); Item # 1.J. Sold 5 BOTZ at $39.02 (10/22/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $74.52)
2. Corporate Bonds- $19,000 in principal amount:
Purchases of $4,000 in principal amount made on Thursday will be discussed in my next post, whenever that may be.
I sold 2 Nextera Capital 3.55% SU bonds maturing on 5/1/27 at 98.299.
| Bought 1/24/25; "Profit" = $12.14 |
I still own two. I bought as a replacement 2 Nextera Capital 5.05% SU maturing in 2033 as discussed in Item # 2.A. below.
A. Bought 2 Nextera Capital 5.05% SU Maturing on 2/28/2033 at a Total Cost of 99.284 - Fidelity Account:
Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of the utility holding company NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) who guarantees the notes:
ProspectusThe main subsidiaries are Florida Power & Light and NextEra Energy Resources. SEC Filed 2024 Annual Report
NEE SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 3/31/25
NEE Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch
This bond will generate more current income than the 2027 bond that was sold. I also extend the maturity with the higher coupon bond.
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa1/BBB+
YTM at Total Cost: 5.161%
Current Yield at TC: 5.086%
Last Nextera Capital Bond Offering (2/25): Prospectus for $2.5B in subordinated debentures maturing in 2055
B. Bought 2 Southwestern Public Service 5.3% First Mortgage Bonds Maturing on 5/15/35 at a Total Cost of 98.862 - Vanguard Account:
Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of the utility holding company Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL)
Prospectus (4/30/25)
10-Q for Southwestern Public Service
![]() |
| P. 4, In Millions |
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: A3/A-
YTM at Total Cost: 5.448%
Current Yield at TC: 5.361%
With this purchase, I now own 14 corporate bonds maturing in 2035. Of those bonds, 10 are first mortgage bonds issued by electric utility companies and 2 are senior unsecured bonds issued by Virginia Electric.
C. Bought 2 Globe Life 4.8% SU Maturing on 6/15/32 at a Total Cost of 97.269 - Fidelity Account:
Issuer: Globe Life Inc. (GL)
GL Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch
GL SEC Filed 2024 Annual Report
GL SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 3/31/25
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa1/A
YTM at Total Cost: 5.264%
Current Yield at TC: 4.935%
D. Bought 2 Williams 5.15% SU Maturing on 3/15/34 at a Total Cost of 97.35 - Fidelity Account:
Issuer: Williams Cos. (WMB) - Energy Infrastructure
I own the common shares that I last discussed here: Item # 1.B. Pared WMB - Sold 5 at $61.1 (4/4/25 Post)(profit snapshot = $188.44) I currently own 40+ shares with a $23.2 average cost per share.
SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 12/31/24
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB+
YTM at Total Cost: 5.531%
Current Yield at TC: 5.29%
E. Bought 2 Mid-America Apartments LP 5% SU Maturing on 3/15/34 at a Total Cost of 98.667 - Fidelity Account:
Issuer: Operating entity for Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc. (MAA)
"MAA, an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on delivering full-cycle and superior investment performance for shareholders through the ownership, management, acquisition, development and redevelopment of quality apartment communities primarily in the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. As of March 31, 2025, MAA had ownership interest in 104,011 apartment units, including communities currently in development, across 16 states and the District of Columbia." MAA is a Tennessee corporation that owns 97.4% of of the Mid-America Apartments L.P., a TN limited partnership, operating units.
MAA SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 3/31/25
MAA SEC Filed 2024 Annual Report
I recently eliminated my common stock positions. Item # 1.E. Eliminated MAA - Sold 5 at $169.88 (3/18/25 Post)(profit snapshot = $220.66)
I prefer owning the MAA LP bonds.
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: A3/A-
YTM at Total Cost: 5.203%
Current Yield at TC: 5.068%
Last Bond Offering (12/24): Prospectus for $350M 4.95% SU maturing in 2035
Other Owned MAA LP SU Bonds:
4 Maturing on 11/15/25 (bought in 10/24 and 11/24), Bond Page | FINRA.org
2 Maturing on 6/1/27 (bought in 2/25), Bond Page | FINRA.org
2 Maturing on 3/15/29 (bought in 3/25), Bond Page | FINRA.org
F. Bought 2 Extra Space Storage LP 5.4% SU Maturing on 2/1/34 at a Total Cost of 98.655 - Vanguard Account:
Issuer: Operating entity for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) who guarantees the notes:
EXR SEC Filed Earnings Report for the Q/E 3/31/25
![]() |
| In Thousands except for share and share data |
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB+
YTM at Total Cost: 5.595%
Current Yield at TC: 5.474%
Last Bond Offering (3/25): Prospectus for $500M 5.4% SU maturing in 2035.
I have never owned the common stock.
I currently own the following Extra Space Storage LP SU bonds:
2 Maturing on 7/1/26 (bought in 11/24), Bond Page | FINRA.org
2 Maturing on 6/15/29 (bought in 4/25), Bond Page | FINRA.org
G. Bought 2 Xcel Energy 5.5% SU Maturing on 3/15/34 at a Total Cost of 99.67 - Interactive Brokers Account:
Issuer: Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL - A Utility Holding Company
XEL SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 3/31/25
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa1/BBB
YTM at Total Cost: 5.547%
Current Yield at TC: 5.518%
At the closing stock price on 5/2, the common shares had a 3.22% yield and the P/E ratio was over 20. XEL Stock Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha I do not own the common stock and have no interest in buying shares anywhere near the current price.
I currently own the following Xcel SU bonds:
1 Maturing on 6/1/25 (bought in 3/24)
2 Maturing on 12/1/26 (bought in 10/24), Bond Page | FINRA.org
2 Maturing on 6/15/28 (bought in 2/25), Bond Page | FINRA.org
I also own first mortgage bonds issued by an XEL subsidiary Public Service of Colorado. Item # 5.G. Bought 2 Public Service of Colorado 3.7% First Mortgage Bonds Maturing on 6/15/28 at a Total Cost of 96.854 (2/5/25 Post); Bond Page | FINRA.org I replaced with that purchase two FM bonds that will mature on 5/15/25.
H. Bought 2 Nextera Capital 5% SU Maturing on 7/15/32 at a Total Cost of 99- Fidelity Account:
Issuer: See Item # 2.A. above.
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa1/BBB+
YTM at Total Cost: 5.167%
Current Yield at TC: 5.05%
I. Bought 1 Entergy Louisiana 5% First Mortgage Bond Maturing on 7/15/44 at a Total Cost of 86.683 - Fidelity Account:
Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of the utility holding company Entergy Corp. (ETR)
![]() |
| 10-Q at page 90, In Thousands |
This is my first corporate bond purchase for a 2044 maturity.
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: A2/A
YTM at Total Cost: 6.175%
Current Yield at TC = 5.768%
Last Bond Offering (1/25): Prospectus for $750M First Mortgage bond maturing in 2055.
J. Bought 2 Southern Company Gas 5.15% SU Maturing on 9/15/32 at a Total Cost of 99.582 - Fidelity Account:
Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of the utility holding company Southern Co. (SO)
Southern Company Gas is a natural gas utility.
SO SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 3/31/25
![]() |
| Page 36 10-Q |
Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org
Credit Ratings: Baa1/A-
YTM at Total Cost: 5.218%
Current Yield at TC = 5.172%
I now own only $6K in principal amount of corporate bonds maturing in 2032, and all of those are discussed in this section. I mention that number to emphasize that I am not close to assuming any interest rate risk that is material to me.
Last Bond Offering (9/24): Prospectus for $450M of 4.95% SU maturing in 2024
3. Treasury Bills Purchased at Auction:
I am now alternating between purchasing $5K and 10K each week. For the next auction, I plan to buy 5 of the 4 month bills.
A. Bought 10 Treasury Bills at the 5/5/25 Auction - Schwab Account:
91 Day Bill
Mature on 8/7/2025
Interest: $106.67
Investment Rate: 4.325%
I will buy $5,000 of the 4 month bill at next Wednesday's auction.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor, but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sale of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals, and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and my family members.














%205.05%25%202:28:33.png)

.png)


%20.png)
%205.15%25%203:15:34%20.png)
%20.png)
%205.4%25%202:1:34.png)


%205.5%25%203:15:34.png)
%205%25%207:15:32.png)

%207:15:44%20.png)


%209:15:32%205.15%25%20.png)



I published earlier today a YouTube video discussing my reaction to the tariff agreement reached by China and the U.S. Both sides reduced their "retaliatory" tariffs to 10% with the U.S. keeping its 20% fentanyl related tariff.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiAQXRbKkkk
I am not going to chase the stocks that are moving higher today. There are a few stocks in bond like stock sectors (e.g. REITs) that are not participating in the rally as interest rates rise. I may do some buying in those stocks this week in response to price declines, so I am modifying the statement made in this post that I will not be buying any stocks this week.
I am expecting that the VIX will be returning to below 20 movement:
Cboe Volatility Index (VIX)
19.24 -2.66 -12.15%
Last Updated: May 12, 2025 at 9:10 a.m. CDT
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/vix
Below 20 movement is consistent with the historical pattern after a Trigger Event, as defined in my VIX Model, but historically that movement has been temporary.
Historical patterns, which may not repeat now, indicate that the problems causing the kind of volatility spike that was recently experienced and lower stock prices are still around and will cause another VIX spike accompanied by lower stock prices. It would be a first for the VIX to return to a Stable Vix Pattern after a Trigger Event.
Monday, March 3, 2025
"My SeekingAlpha Post Discussing the Vix Asset Allocation Model - Originally Published on 10/17/2014"
https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2025/03/my-seekingalpha-post-published-on.html
Crude oil prices are rising and gold is declining as recession fears recede.
"It would be a first for the VIX to return to a Stable Vix Pattern after a Trigger Event."
DeleteAnswers a question I was wondering.
It's what I expect.
____
To look for the possible counters as an exercise in covering all the bases...
The only reason to consider the possibility of restablization ...was how resilient the economy was with covid. Maybe the same resilient factors are in play (such as sadly 1million or more dying so the labor market didn't collapse.)
Trump may chose policies that buoy the market (artificially like announced tariff deals).
But there's already recession signals (I've read there are). He can't fix that without a major policy redirect, requiring a major personality change.
Then there's whatever's coming from him which can be counted as black swan events, and not anticipated.
Land: Trump did not accomplish anything positive by imposing extreme tariffs on China’s exports to the U.S., but did cause a significant disruption in the U.S. supply chain. Both sides just walked back to 10% retaliatory tariffs and China will roll back some trade restrictions that it imposed in response to Trump’s extreme tariffs. Trump will cast that as a win, but it is just a retreat back to something that is not totally crazy.
DeleteTrump is still insane and subject to acting on impulse and whims so investors are probably overly optimistic about the trade war being resolved without causing severe damage to both economies. The 145% tariff would probably have generated less revenue than a 30% tariff. Trade will still occur at the reduced tariff levels, but U.S. importers will try to pass on the tariff tax cost, all or as much as possible, to U.S. consumers. And, energy prices, depressed by recession fears, may continue to rise adding to month-to-month CPI increases. It is not all upside that total craziness has been reduced to arguably sane U.S. actions on trade.
I am not going to sell anything today into the rally other than a few shares from some underperforming stocks that eliminated their dividends and are rallying some. I am simply offsetting realized gains by small amounts (about $300 so far in realized losses with realized gains over $10K).
I have several stock or stock fund positions that I will reduce some in profitable trades, provided the rally continues provided the sales price is higher than the closing price on 2/19/25, and several that I own now meet that threshold.
WMT still has a problem at 30% as do many other retailers. It is definitely a more manageable one than at a 145% tariff tax.
Increased prices for clothes, shoes and other relatively low priced items caused by U.S. tariff taxes will result in a decline in volumes and put downside pressure on profit margins. How much is anybody’s guess. But in the packaged food sector during the high inflationary period it would be typical to see a 10% annual increase in price to recoup just input cost inflation resulting in a 7%-12% decline in volume.
Thanks!!
DeleteOther than Walmart, most of what I have that I would consider selling is SPY, IWM, QQQ.
DeleteThey won't be higher than my 2/19/25 price. The market isn't making new highs yet.
I bought them 10 plus years ago. Some of them 20 years ago. Smaller amount of SPY and IWM were bought at the low point in 2020.
TXN is also on the sell list. About $460 positive today.
Regional bank stocks had fallen significantly in price due to recession fears and are rebounding today more than the S&P 500 as recession concerns recede some:
ReplyDeleteSPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE)
$59.56 +$2.98 +5.27%
As of 10:42 AM EDT
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/kre
S&P 500 Index
5,805.96 +146.05 +2.58%
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/spx
Good to know.
DeleteWalmart and discount 'flight to safety' stores are going down too.
Stanley Black & Decker Inc (SWK)
ReplyDelete$72.53 +$9.86 +15.73%
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/swk
SWK has reduced over the last several years its reliance on manufacturing plants located in China but still sources a lot of production there. Today's rally in this stock reflects just how much investors were concerned about the major negative impact on profits resulting from the 145% tariffs. The impact is still negative at a 30% tariff rate.
Given the uncertainty about tariff levels, I was only able to buy 5 SWK shares recently at $57.39.
Item # 1.G.
https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2025/04/alex-elc-hr-htbk-mrcc-peo-rmt-sbsi-swk.html
As discussed in Item # 2.H. of that post, I also own 2 SWK 4.25% senior unsecured bonds maturing on 11/15/28 (YTM at TC then at 5.11%).
The T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX), which I own and have been paring, held up fairly well during the stock market's decline earlier this year.
ReplyDeleteThe net asset value per share closed today at $35.63, up $.73.
The 2/19/25 close, the day the S&P 500 hit its all time high, was at $35.7.
I may sell 50 or 100 shares when another rally takes the price over $35.7. This criteria for selling after the VIX returned to below 20 movement was created when the market started to rally off its lows in order to prevent me from selling into the early stage of the rally, anticipating that the VIX would return to below 20 movement after a strong rebound rally which has occurred after prior Trigger Events in what I call the Recovery Phase in my Vix Model that historically has been temporary before the next major VIX spike.
The Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) fund was up only .15%, closing at $65.5, restrained down by its silver and gold bullion allocation which is maintained near 25%. That allocation helped this fund during the stock meltdown period. The fund closed at $64.51on 2/19/25 so it currently meets the criteria for a reduction.
VHCOX, the Vanguard Capital Opportunity mutual fund, was up $3.05, closing at $81.8 which is still to far below its 2/19/25 close of $87.51 and consequently is unlikely to be pared. I was reducing my allocation to that fund prior to 2/19.
I own several common stocks that meet my criteria for selling in that the prices are higher than the closing prices on 2/19.
In 2018, you're the end of the year on worries about tariffs, the market pull back and came very close to a trigger event.
ReplyDeleteAnd I remembering correctly? The trigger event never happened, so the recovery doesn't count as going back into stable since it stayed and stable.
It was close to a trigger event. But there is the oddity that Vix was moving under 15, not just under 20, in the lead up to the trigger count. And it never made it to enough days.
Land: As I recall, there was almost a Trigger Event in December 2018 in response to Trump raising tariffs on $200B of China's exports to 25% from the 10% imposed during the summer.
DeleteThe tariff war started with the U.S. imposing in January 2018 a 30% tariff on solar panels and China responded in April with tariffs on a roughly equivalent dollar value of U.S. exports (about $3B) including 15% duties on fruits, nuts, wine and steel pipes, and a 25% tax on pork and several other products.
In April 2018, the U.S. accelerated the tariff war with 25% tariff taxes on about $50B in China's exports and China responded with 25% tariffs on a variety of U.S. exports including soybeans. This led to U.S. farmers permanently losing export market share in soybean exports to China.
In late summer, Trump imposed a 10% tariff on $200B in China's exports and that acceleration produced close to a 300 point drop in the S&P 500 starting from a September high near 2930. The market stabilized and start to turn back up into November, with the S&P 500 gaining close to 100 points.
In December, Trump accelerated the war by raising tariffs on $200B of China's exports from 10% to 25% which caused a temporary spike in the VIX that came close to a Trigger Event, a very close call. I may have discounted 2 or 3 closes barely above 25 given the small number of higher closes. The S&P 500 retreated quickly back down to around 2460 as the VIX spiked.
As I recall there was news in late December 2018 about a trade deal and the market quickly rebounded back to higher than 2930 by May 2019.
The reaction this year was more severe in the VIX since the tariffs on China's exports went up quickly to 145% and 125% on U.S. exports to China as China retaliated as it did in 2018, and Trump took on the entire world this year with higher tariffs and violated the USMCA agreement that he signed during his first term.
It was around 4/28/25 that Trump and Bessent claimed that a trade deal with India could be announced that week or the week after. No such announcement has been made yet. I noted today that India said it was considering retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. which does not sound like a deal is about to happen.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/india-proposes-counter-duties-against-us-notice-wto-shows-2025-05-13/
You remember way more details than I do.
DeleteThanks
Are you using the 2/19 highs because in the past during the recovery., the markets come back to old highs, or very very close.?
ReplyDeleteFor index funds they're pretty far off there 2/19 highs. (I'll calculate percents tomorrow when I'm awake.)
I was hoping the Vixs wouldn't go under 20, until after the price recovery was a little better so that it would be an obvious decision of when to sell. Oh well. At least it's following the patterns.
Land: The primary reason is to restrain my stock selling when my allocation is already at very low level. A secondary reason is that the S&P 500 or a large number of stocks can rise to new highs after a Trigger Event. An example is what happened after the August 2007 Trigger Event with the S&P 500 rising to new highs in early October 2007, near 1500 as I recall. By early March 2009, that index had declined to around 670. There were multiple VIX Confirmation Events after October 2007 that confirmed the existence of a dangerous Unstable Vix Pattern before the Catastrophic Event occurred in October 2008 shortly after Lehman's failure. I may be off some on the numbers.
DeleteI vaguely remember that in most cases indices went back to new highs during the first recovery period... but in one crash they never quite made it. I don't remember which one. (Not the 2008 crisis obviously.)
DeleteFor Extended Markets (market minus S&Ps holdings).... right now price on VXF etf is 185.
DeleteMid Feb trading range bottom at 195.5 is 5.6% higher.
At trading range top it's 202, is 9.2% higher.
For S&P's VOO etf current is $ 537. Bottom of mid-feb trading range is 546 which is 1.7% higher.
Near top of the multiple tops is ~ 562. That's 4.7% higher.
Land: I went back to check the closing numbers for the S&P 500 in the July to October 2007 period.
DeleteS&P 500 Closes:
7/19/2007 1553.06
August Trigger Event
8/15/2007 1,406.7, lowest close during TE
VIX Closed at 30.67
8/16/27 Intraday as low as 1,370.60, closed at 1,411.27.
VIX at 30.83
Close on 10/9/2007: 1,565.15, slightly higher than the previous all time closing high in July 2007. Vix closed at 16.12. The lowest close during the Recovery Period.
Confirmation Events are VIX surges after the Trigger Event that would independently qualify as Trigger Events without the first one or close to it.
After the August 2007 TE, there were Confirmation Events in November 2027, January-March 2008 (a stronger get out of Dodge signal than the August TE) that led to another brief movement below 20 by May 2008, and then another Confirmation Event in July 2008. The next Confirmation Event started in mid-September 2008 and morphed quickly into a Catastrophic Event in October that continue until the March 2009 intraday low of 666 in the S&P 500.
Sentiment of investment articles has shifted.
ReplyDeleteA title from seeking alpha (behind paywall).
"JPMorgan dials back U.S. recession risk to less than 50%, pushes back rate cuts"
As calculated by the CME FedWatch tool, the probabilities of a rate cut on or before the July meeting have been drifting down.
DeleteAs of 10.41 CST today, the odds of a 25% basis point cut on or before the July meeting was at 34.9%, down from at least a .25% cut at 93% one month ago when the the more probable than not prediction was for the FF range to be .5% lower than the current 4.25%-4.5%.
Part of that downtrend is due to the FED's concerns, which become stronger in its last policy statement, about inflation reigniting due to Trump's policies with unemployment remaining relatively benign and stable at 4.2% using the last reported number from April. So a wait and see approach is likely to be followed before cutting again.
JPM had a 60% probability of a recession as I recall, so 50% is not that much of a decline.
I believe the odds are in the 60% to 70% range within the next 12 months. That is based on my opinion that far too many consumers are already financially stressed with high debt levels, and are becoming increasingly so, plus there is a rapidly increasing segment who are not currently stressed but are becoming more worried about the economy, their jobs and the inflationary impacts of tariffs that reductions. Together, those issues will likely result in meaningfully decreases in discretionary spending and some essential spending by many households, sending PCE into negative territory later this year. That is a minority view now.
Besides the tariffs, the deportations of undocumented immigrants will at some point cause disruptions in the U.S. supply chain, primarily in agriculture, that will lead to higher inflation numbers. The April CPI data released earlier today was compiled earlier that month and does not yet reflect the full impact of the current tariffs due to the timing of the data collection and the huge volume of imports in February and March delaying the impact of price increases.
I've sold 5 share SPY at $5.87. I want to rebuy these as QQQ, In Roth.
ReplyDeleteI want to sell quite a bit of VXF & IWM.
Will be out tomorrow which complicates it. Can't tell if this will be 2 days below VIX 20 or 6 months in and out with new highs.
Land: I assume that you sold 5 SPY at $587. I have not transitioned yet into selling any stocks or stock funds that are higher than the 2/19/25 closing prices.
DeleteI am doing some light buying in the bond like stocks that are declining in response to higher intermediate term interest rates, the bond maturity spectrum that the dividend yields compete.
There is an anomaly today. The financial news sites refer to the CPI report earlier today as favorable which would, if so viewed by the Bond Ghouls, lead to a lower 10 year treasury yield and higher odds of a rate cut on or before the July meeting. The ten year T note yield is up, trading now close to 4.5%, up from 4.17% as of 4/30/25, and the probability of a rate cut on or before the July meeting has gone down slightly compared to yesterday.
I may try to divine the rationale in a video later today. One factor is that crude oil is moving back up in price and the decline in energy prices have contributed significantly to the moderation in CPI.
Good info to know. Looking forward to checking the videos.
DeleteYesterday I sold 4K in mid cap, 20k in VXF and 20K in IWM.
VXF didn't move down nearly as much as IWM today. So I sold another 10k. All Roth.
Still have another 100k to sell.
My plan is certainly against all the standard advice. You have to both time getting out, and getting back in. Especially since it's long-term money in the Roth.
I'm making a commitment that if the Vix switches to a stable pattern, or looks like it's going to, I will get back in no matter what price opportunity I've missed.
Normally I would wait a month or two to sell more, to catch a different price point.
But my whole premise is that there's a bit of rock slide underneath the surface. I don't know how long I really want to wait for it to start sliding??
Also can't tell if this is doing a climb strongly the way it did in the first Trump admin on the idea of tax and regulation cuts for businesses and Trump supporters happy with him.
Or if the moves made already plus more instability is going to tank the economy or at least the market.
Placing my bet on the latter.
You're giving some strong concerns that support that idea.
My thought is that the problem with selling taxable capital gains, is that I'm in the 15% bracket 8% percent state tax.
DeleteSo I'd have to have a sell and rebuy, that's at least 23% lower (on the amount of the capital gain, not the stock price) just to break even. That's a tall order to time.
Land: Tennessee does not have a state income tax. When I was working in D.C. back in the late 1970s and early 1980s, I lived in Silver Spring, Maryland. This was before the top marginal federal income tax rate was reduced from 50% on earned income which I was hitting, and Maryland had a 7.5% tax as I recall (5% state; 2.5% Montgomery County) I did no stock trading during that time period. The marginal rate was higher on non-earned income. The 50% was a cap on the marginal rate limited to earned income.
DeleteI moved back to Tennessee in 1982 in part due to no state income tax, and built the house where I now reside using cash. The 15 year mortgage rate was at 16% with points when I started to build in August 1982.
I negate in some cases, or mitigate in others the tax issue through trading. Selling the rips and buying the dips. It is easy to do this for me since I am looking at so many stocks, usually in the 250 -500 range, where I can implement this kind of strategy which frequently involves trading channel assessments (defining a channel using a 2 year stock chart, sell near the top, buy near the bottom)
Sometimes there may be a very long time between selling shares and buying some or all back. I will have an example in my next post where I sold 40 shares at $25.02 in November 2010 and just bought back 5 at $16.5 - with no trades in between. If I end up with 40 shares again, it will be a series of 5 share trades each at the lowest price in the chain. I view that company as more valuable now than in 2010.
I will also mitigate the tax bite by selling losers to offset realized gains. I have taken about $300 in losses so far this month to offset in part over $10K in realized gains. I selected two common stocks for reductions that had eliminated their dividends (e.g. I sold 5 shares of CVI yesterday).
I want to generate at least $20K in realized capital gains per year as a supplement to my dividend and interest income, regardless of the tax issue. That is hard to do with my low stock allocation now, but I can still hit that goal by adding "realized market discounts" on bonds that are in reality capital gains ("profits") but are taxed as interest income. I estimate now that this "profit" number representing the difference between the redemption proceeds and and my total costs will be over $8K this year.
I have entered an order to sell 10 PRPFX which will be filled at today's closing price. This "moderate allocation" mutual fund closed at $64.51 on 2/19/25 and at $66.27 yesterday. While this fund does own stocks, the weighting was at 34.47% as of 1/31/25:
ReplyDeleteSEC Filed Annual Report at pages 4-10
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/357298/000119312525073541/d896425dncsr.htm
The other assets are gold and silver bullion (26.32% as of 1/31/25), treasuries, investment grade corporate bonds, and Swiss government bonds.
I discussed this fund in a YT video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXaRH48woSU
The ten year treasury yield continues to trend higher and is currently trading at a 4.513% yield, up from 4.17% as of 4/30/25. This uptrend has placed downward pressure on bond like stock sectors like equity REITs and utilities.
Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ)
$87.66 -$0.80 -0.90%
Last Updated: May 14, 2025 at 11:22 a.m. EDT
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/vnq?mod=search_symbol
Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU)
$78.49 -$1.16 -1.46%
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlu?mod=search_symbol
I discussed in a YT video published yesterday that the Bond Ghouls did not have a favorable reaction to yesterday's CPI report that was viewed as positive by stock investors:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZU0cwQHrQQ&t=21s
Bond investors are laser focused on inflation trends.
I participated in today's 4 month T Bill auction that resulted in a 4.36% investment rate. The bill matures on 9/16/25. That IR signals no FF rate cut on or before the July FED meeting given the current FF range at 4.25% to 4.5%. This kind of price signal is a crowd sourced consensus opinion, which may be wrong, among large investors.
ReplyDeleteSometimes, some other concern may come into play when setting the yield such as a concern about the U.S. government defaulting on its debt prior to maturity of the T Bill by failing to increase the debt limit which is always a possibility when republicans control the House, many of whom are more than just a little bit crazy.
"U.S. could face default by August if Congress doesn't address debt ceiling, Bessent says"
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-could-face-default-by-august-if-congress-doesnt-address-debt-ceiling-bessent-says/
I started to read a book last night titled "Fools on the Hill: The Hooligans, Saboteurs, Conspiracy Theorists, and Dunces Who Burned Down the House" which does not provide much comfort on that issue.
THAT explains today's moves. Small caps were down with NASDAQ up. That's typical of inflation leading to rate worry.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't quite figure it out while Vix hadn't moved up that much.
There is a rally today in the 10 year treasury which is currently at 4.444%, down 9.4 basis points.
ReplyDeletePowell made some comments suggesting the FED may return to fighting inflation as its number 1 priority. That kind of suggestion would make bond investors slightly more willing to buy longer dated maturities.
I have published a new post:
ReplyDeletehttps://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2025/05/bbdc-doc-eprprc-flo-gis-holx-mrcc-trc-u.html
50% income tax, that is a lot. I would resent taxes. I've read that at one point it was 90% for high earners.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad I don't add a city tax to the county and state tax. I don't know if silver spring has any city tax now.
My first mortgage was 12%. 16% would have put me off buying. My current mortgage is done in two more payments, June and July's. 4.25%.
I haven't tried anything with channels. Buying the dips and selling the rips is a good way to make profits, but It'd be taxable. Of course having income to tax, means you have... Income.