Friday, October 11, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: CS, HTPRD, IBB, ICLN, ING

Economy



Inverted yield curve guru Campbell Harvey: Prepare for recession 

There are two U.S. centric events that could contribute to the onset of a recession given the magnitude of their impacts on an already slowing economy: GM strike and Boeing's 737MAX problems. 


China 'strongly urges' US to remove sanctions and stop accusing it of human rights violations


Trump's latest China blacklist focuses on infrastructure, repression


Social Security Administration announces lower COLA than the past two years - MarketWatch (the inflation increase for 2020 will be 1.6% or about $23 per month for someone receiving the average monthly benefit of $1460 per month)

+++++

Markets and Market Commentary

The stock market is forecasting that China and the U.S. will at least partially resolve some trade issues today. 

The Elizabeth Warren stock-market correction will happen sooner than you think: RBC - MarketWatch Unless the democrats gain control over the Senate and then eliminate the filibuster rule by a majority vote, a President Warren would have no chance at all to pass any of signature pieces of legislation. Coming soon: The death of the filibuster - POLITICO

If the Democrats manage to take control over the senate with a slender majority,  and republican senators block everything they want to do through filibusters which requires 60 votes to shut down, then I would view it likely that the filibuster rule will be eliminated; and then a significant negative market reaction would be justified IMO. U.S. debt would explode higher potentially reaching $2 trillion per year within 4 to 6 years after Medicare for All, free college, etc. become law. 


Eroding profit margins will push U.S. into recession in 2020, leading forecaster says - MarketWatch


Goldman Sachs Says REITs Remain Solid 2020 Dividend Ideas - 24/7 Wall St.


10-year Treasury yield pushes above 1.6% after European bond-market selloff spills into U.S. - MarketWatch (10/10/19 article) The purported reason for the European bond sell-off was the release of the ECB minutes that showed disagreements among members about restarting QE. However, that was already known prior to the release of the minutes. Account of the monetary policy meeting: ECB 10/10/19 


Kroger downgraded with analysts calling the grocer's 'costly' tech investment a 'misstep' - MarketWatch


Jim Cramer: ‘You are out of your mind’ if you have conviction in this stock market - MarketWatch


Kraton’s stock craters as the global economic slowdown prompts profit warning - MarketWatch

++++++

Trump:

Trump asked Tillerson to get DOJ to drop case against Giuliani client in 2017: report - MarketWatch


Trump asked Tillerson to help broker deal to end U.S. prosecution of Turkish trader represented by Giuliani - The Washington Post 

Trump and Giuliani's Ukraine Schemes Unraveling


Giuliani Pressed for Turkish Prisoner Swap in Oval Office Meeting


Two Men, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, Who Helped Giuliani on Ukraine Arrested

Giuliani’s Ukraine Team: In Search of Influence, Dirt and Money - The New York Times


Two Key Players In The Ukraine Controversy Spent Lavishly As They Dug For Dirt On Biden

Parnas and Fruman are part of Giuliani's dream team which includes Paul Manafort and Dmytro Firtash, who is under house arrest in Vienna waiting extradition to the U.S. to face bribery, racketeering, and money laundering charges in the U.S. His bail in Austria was set at €125M, the largest in Austria's history. Rudy Giuliani's Mysterious Vienna Trip - The Atlantic 


Showboat Rudy proudly waved an affidavit from Firtash during a Fox interview where Firtash claimed to have dirt on Joe Biden. How Dmytro Firtash Seized Giuliani’s Biden Attacks to Fight Extradition to the U.S. 


2 Guys Who Helped Giuliani Go After Biden in Ukraine Were Just Arrested 

Giuliani associates charged with illegally funneling cash to pro-Trump group - Reuters


Foreign-born Trump donors tied to Rudy Giuliani's Ukraine efforts arrested at airport with one way tickets to foreign country 


U.S. vs Lev Parnas et al. indictment - The Washington Post

Among other alleged criminal acts, the two Giuliani associates funneled money from foreign sources, including someone with "Russian roots", through shell corporations to a pro-Trump Super Pac and other republicans. The indictments also connect the two to Giuliani's efforts to tar Joe Biden and to fire Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine viewed by Trump and Giuliani as an obstacle to their Ukraine plan to tar Joe Biden. 


One of the republicans, Pete Sessions, advocated for the dismissal of Ms, Yovanovitch after meeting with Parnas and Fruman.Former Texas Rep. Pete Sessions was pushed by Giuliani associates to back effort to eject Ukraine ambassador The firing of Ms Yovanovitch was part of Trump's scheme to coerce Ukraine to publicly investigate Joe Biden.   


Trump orders Gordon Sondland not to appear for House testimony

White House Declares War on Impeachment Inquiry Trump decided that it would be better to obstruct the inquiry than to allow witnesses with knowledge to testify or to produce more incriminating documents.


Donald Trump's Failure to Comply With Congressional Subpoenas Was Once Described by Lindsey Graham as Impeachment-worthy (see video embedded in the article). Senator Graham meant to say that it is an impeachment worthy event when a Democrat President obstructs a Congressional inquiry, not when a republican president does the same.  Being one of the most hypocritical politicians, Graham has lost whatever credibility he may have had when he was Senator McCain's sidekick.   


The democrats are hoping that Senator Graham follows through with his stated desire to call Showboat Rudy as a witness. Graham plans to invite Giuliani to testify on Ukraine affair - ABC News 


Fact check: Trump tweets barrage of false claims on the weekend and Monday morning - CNN


Profit, not politics: Trump allies sought Ukraine gas deal


The Trumpster republican Senator from Wisconsin Ron Johnson told the WSJ that the U.S. ambassador Gordon Sondland told him Trump would release the military aid provided Ukraine launched an investigation.


Sondland had travelled from Europe to D.C. to testify last Tuesday. Trump decided to block him from testifying a few hours before he was scheduled to give his deposition.


When Senator Johnson was asked about his quid pro quo statement by Chuck Todd, he evaded the question and attempted to bring up an unrelated matter involving a fired FBI employee.



Senator Johnson stated that he did not trust the FBI or the CIA. Ron Johnson Says He Doesn’t Trust the FBI or CIA When It Comes to Trump and Ukraine | Vanity Fair Republicans are doing whatever they can to undermine both agencies including enlisting foreign government support to undermine them. 

E.U. ambassador to testify in impeachment inquiry, defying Trump administration

Trump's former Russia aide set to give revealing testimony on Giuliani, Sondland

Republican politicians will aid and abet Donald's obstruction, either through affirmative acts or silence.   


++


Trump and Biden



Giuliani's case rests on two Ukrainians with checkered pasts and suspect motives 

The linchpin of Trump's conspiracy theory is that VP Biden had a prosecutor, Viktor Shokin fired because he was investigating the company, Burisma, that had hired Hunter Biden as a director.  


The U.S. government and European governments wanted Shokin out since he was not investigating corruption in the Ukraine and had fired the anti-corruption members of the Prosecutor Generals’ OfficeWhat really happened when Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor: USA TodayNo reforms, no aid for Ukraine | European Council on Foreign RelationsUkraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor-The New York Times (3/29/16); Trump endorses Ukraine's swamp monster, prosecutor Viktor Shokin Donald sees a kindred spirit in Shokin 


Earlier this year, Bloomberg reported that the investigation into Burisma had been dormant for over a year BEFORE Shokin was fired. Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim - BloombergTrump allies respond to second whistleblower: 'Why should I care?'


What about Donald's children benefiting from their Dad's position as President. 


And, I would note that the republicans are not claiming that Joe Biden received compensation from Burisma or anyone else while he was Vice President. 


What about Donald enriching himself during his Presidency. 


Republicans simply do not make those comparisons:  


Report: Trump's Conflicts in Year Two - CREW


Trump uses presidency to promote his properties, fatten his own wallet

How Is Donald Trump Profiting From the Presidency? Let Us Count the Ways | The Report: Opinion | US News 

Donald Trump Has Spent Nearly A Third of His Presidency Visiting His Business Properties At Taxpayer Expense: Report


Donald Trump is picking your pocket  


A Trump hotel mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms - POLITICO

A malignant narcissist like Donald will project onto others their unfavorable qualities. How to Confront Narcissists' Lethal Weapon: Projection | Psychology TodayProjection;


An example would be Donald claiming that Biden misused his office for personal gain, even though there is no supporting evidence, when the truth is that Donald is the guilty one with abundant facts supporting that claim. 


Trump claims that he is only interested in asking foreign governments to investigate corruption. When asked whether he had asked foreign governments to investigate a U.S. citizen other than Joe Biden, Trump could not identify anyone. In fact, his administration has a record of repealing laws designed to ferret out corruption. Trump Says He's Concerned About Corruption:  NPRDonald Trump's sudden fixation on 'investigating corruption' in Ukraine doesn't add up - CNN 


Of course, Trump and his republican colleagues in both the Senate and House will do whatever they can to block and interfere with the House investigations of Trump's malfeasance and corruption. 


As George Will argued in his most recent column, all of those republicans need to be voted out of office and maybe the next batch will take their oath's of office seriously. George Will - The spiraling Trump adds self-impeachment to his repertoire - The Washington Post

Fact: Trump TV Ad Misleads on Biden and Ukraine - FactCheck.org


A law needs to be passed by congress that would place restrictions on a President's children and spouse profiting from that association while the President remains in office. That law could also be extended to cover a Vice President's kids and spouse.  


Democrats Must Admit Joe Biden’s Family Profits Off Him


Opinion | What Hunter Biden Did Was Legal — And That’s the Problem - The New York Times


If the republicans in Congress were actually interested in corruption, they could start by cooperating with the democrats in investigating Trump rather than taking all measures to protect and cover for him.   

+++


Donald Throws an Ally Under the Bus


Putin and his ally President Assad want the Kurd's occupying Northern Syria crushed, and Donald has decided to give them a green light to do so. U.S. and Turkey Between Them May Give Syria’s Assad a Big Boost - Bloomberg

The retired 4 star general Joseph Votel wrote a compelling, must read article about Trump's decision to green light Turkey's attacks on America's Kurdish allies. The Danger of Abandoning Our Partners - The Atlantic


See also: What Top Military Officers Really Think About Trump - The Atlantic


Donald gave the following reasoning for throwing the Kurds under the bus: “And as somebody wrote in a very, very powerful article today, they didn’t help us in the second World War, they didn’t help us with Normandy as an example. They mentioned names of different battles. But they’re there to help us with their land and that’s a different thing.” Donald Trump downplays ties to Kurds; 'they didn't help' with NormandyThe 8 wildest moments from Trump's Wednesday press event

The Kurds hold several thousand ISIS prisoners. If the prisoners escape, Donald says let them go back to Europe. Turkey's Syria invasion ramps up as Donald Trump suggests any ISIS prisoner escapees are Europe's problem - CBS News

The "article" referenced by the Duck was an "opinion" column  by Kurt Schlichter, a self styled "conservative" who writes for Breitbart. Critics Aghast As Trump Keeps Word About No More Wars  He is an attorney, a former comic and a retired Lt. Colonel. Why bother with the State and Defense Departments when you have this guy, whoever he is, having a direct line to Donald. 


Malignant narcissists like Donald will make important decisions on impulse. The Former Secretary of State and CEO of Exxon, Rex Tillerson noted that Trumps "acts on instincts" and added the following pertinent comments back in December 2018: 


“What was challenging for me coming from the disciplined, highly process-oriented ExxonMobil corporation to go to work for a man who is pretty undisciplined, doesn’t like to read, doesn’t read briefing reports, doesn’t like to get into the details of a lot of things, but rather just kind of says, ‘This is what I believe.’ ”

Rex Tillerson in interview says he warned Trump not to break the law - Vox


"So often, the president would say here's what I want to do and here's how I want to do it and I would have to say to him, Mr. President I understand what you want to do but you can't do it that way. It violates the law," Tillerson said. Rex Tillerson makes rare public appearance in Houston - Houston Chronicle


Donald Trump's longtime business connections in Turkey back in the spotlightTrump, Syria, Turkey and Kurds: Abandoning SDF Hurts ISIS Fight - Bloomberg


Erdogan orders Turkish offensive against northern Syria as Kurds mobilize civilian defense 


Exclusive: U.S.-backed Syrian forces halt counter-Islamic State operations -sources - Reuters That has to be case since the Kurds are being attacked by Turkey after Donald gave the green light. 


Donald is completely untrustworthy which has serious adverse ramifications for the U.S. 


+++++

Trump is the primary source for Fake News:


Trump’s new order for Medicare packs potential rise in patients’ costs | PolitiFact Health Check


Trump Wrong on European Aid to Ukraine - FactCheck.org

Trump's Inaccurate Claims About His 'Perfect' Call - FactCheck.org


Donald asserted on 10/9 that "only 25% want the President impeached".



That is a made up number.  

The FiveThirtyEight impeachment tracker has the number at 49.2% as of 10/2/2019. 


The problem for the GOP is that independents are becoming more willing to support impeachment.   


See also, Poll: Half of voters support impeaching and removing Trump - POLITICO


Poll: Majority of Americans say they endorse opening of House impeachment inquiry of Trump - The Washington Post


Trump impeachment: New Fox News poll shows half support inquiry, removal


Trump lashes out over Fox News poll that shows majority support his impeachment


Any fact that Donald does not like is immediately labelled as Fake News.


There is no let up in the constant stream of lies and misinformation streaming from Donald. It really is just overwhelming. 


Donald and DACA


Donald has repeatedly made the false assertion that Obama admitted he lacked the authority to implement DACA. Did Obama say he didn't have the right to issue DACA? | PolitiFact This is the latest false tweet on this subject:



10/9/19 Tweet
Donald attempted to eliminate the DACA program and was enjoined from doing so by a federal district court whose decision was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Opinion.pdf The Fourth Circuit issued a similar order Opinion 18-1521.pdf 

The Supreme Court granted certiorari and will issue an opinion soon. It’s Now the Supreme Court’s Turn to Try to Resolve the Fate of the Dreamers - The New York Times The issue is whether the Trump administration has followed the correct process in attempting to abrogate DACA. 


The 5 "conservative" republican judges will probably overrule the appellate courts, thereby giving the republicans carte blanch to deport the Dreamers to their country of origin. 


Trump and other republicans are willing to hold the Dreamers hostage, possibly granting them some relief from deportation, provided the Democrats agree to the major immigration law changes demanded by the GOP which are unacceptable to the Democrats. The GOP will then blame the democrats for the deportations that became possible after they successfully rescinded the DACA protections. 


+++++++

1. Bought 50 CS at $11.49:


Quotes:

USD ADR: CS | Credit Suisse Group AG ADR
CHF: Credit Suisse Group AG (Switzerland: SWX)

Investor relations – Credit Suisse

CS is a global financial institution.

I have no prior trades.

Information Day of Purchase (10/3/19):



10 Year Currency Conversion ChartCHF / USD Currency Chart. Swiss Franc to US Dollar Rates

Credit Suisse Group AG ADR Analyst Estimates (as of 10/319)
2019: $1.26
2020: $1.51
P/E at $11.49 and $1.51 E.P.S. = 7.61

Chart: Major Destruction Due to the Near Depression Events


Monthly Prices USD ADR
There has been no price recovery from Near Depression lows.

10 Year Chart Day of Purchase:




CS Annual Average Total Return (3/9/09-9/25/19): -.41% ($10K down to $9.575K) Lightyears greater than pathetic.

Compare to SPY ETF at +17.29% annual average total return over the same period ($10K up to $53.796K)

Sourced: DRIP Returns Calculator | Dividend Channel

Dividend History: Extremely Unfavorable



Dividend & Swiss tax values – Credit Suisse

Last Annual Ex Dividend Date:




Future Purchases: Will consider averaging down at less than $10 with another 50 share purchase

Last Earnings Report:





Net Income 2019 2Q = CHF 937M
Divisions:

Swiss Universal Bank: Pre-Tax income of CHF 654M up 18%; Private clients generated pre-tax income of CHF 356M, up 33%; Corporate and Institutional Clients  had pre-tax income of CHF 298M up 5%.

International Wealth Management: Pre Tax income of CHF 444M up 5%

Asia-Pacific: Pre tax income of CHF 237M, up 9%.

Investment Banking and Capital Markets: Net revenues down 30% compared to the 2018 second quarter but up 27% in USD terms from the 2019 1st quarter

Global Markets: Pre-Tax income of CHF 359, up 141% with net revenues increasing 8%.

Broker Reports:

Morningstar (7/31/19): 5 stars with a FV of US$20

S & P (8/6/19): 3 stars with a 12 month PT of $13 (cut target price by $2 to $13)

Goal: Sell in the $16 to $18 range after harvesting at least one annual dividend

Problems relating to the Near Depression period still overhang the company. Crisis-era RMBS lawsuits still overhang Credit Suisse - FT: Seeking Alpha

Issuer: Hersha Hospitality Trust Cl A (HT)
Par Value: $25 Final Prospectus Supplement
Optional Call Date: On or after 5/31/21
Cumulative Dividends: Yes
Stopper Clause: Yes  
Dividends: Paid Quarterly
Last Ex Dividend Date:  6/28/19 
Maturity Date: Potentially perpetual subject to issuer's call right
Qualified Dividends: No, pass through entity

I still own 50 shares bought in a Roth IRA account. Item # 1.A. Bought 50 HTPRD at $20.11 in a Roth IRA Account (12/26/18 Post)


HTPRD Realized Profits to Date: $577.46  ($416 in prior trades)

I sold at a price near my highest sell points to date: Item # 1.A. Sold Last 50 HTPRD Shares at $25.85 (10/9/17 Post)Item # 2 Sold 150 HTPRD at $25.8  (9/18/17 post) 

I currently own 80 HT common shares.

I am currently down to the following equity REIT preferred stocks: 

100 AHTPRI

 50  MNRPRC
 50  BRGPRA
 50  HTPRD 

3. Short Term Bond/CD Ladder Basket Strategy:

A. Bought 2 Treasury Bills Maturing on 1/23/20 (secondary market)
YTM = 1.918%


This was a secondary market purchase of a treasury bill. The interest will be the difference between the price paid and the $1K per bond par value ($13.12 in interest for 2 bonds). Since I bought a zero coupon treasury bill, I did not have to paid accrued interest to the seller.

B. Bought 2 Treasury Bills Maturing on 1/3/20 (secondary market):
YTM 1.926% YTM




This was another secondary market purchase of a zero coupon treasury bill.

C. Bought 2 Treasury Bills Maturing on 2/6/20 (secondary market):
YTM = 1.915%




D. Bought 5 Hancock Whitney Bank 2% CDs Maturing on 11/8/19:



Holding Company: Hancock Whitney Corp. (HWC)
Hancock Whitney Corp.

E. Bought 2 Treasury Bills Maturing on 1/30/20 (secondary market):
YTM = 1.907%

4. Small Ball Commission Free ETFs:

A. Bought 50 ICLN at $10.89:




Quote: ICLN | iShares Global Clean Energy ETF Overview | MarketWatch

Sponsor's Website: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | ICLN

Number of Holdings: 30

Expense Ratio: .46% (about average for a specialty sector fund)

This ETF was favorably mentioned by Abby Cohen in the January 2019 Barron's Roundtable. Goldman Sachs’ Abby Joseph Cohen Highlights Global Bargains - Barron's She liked this ETF in part due to its socially acceptable investments in clean energy companies. The Remarkable Rise Of ESG

ICLN Information Day of Trade:



Chart-Pathetic Since IPO:


IPO in June 2008
This ETF has had two good periods including the current year but was mauled soon after its IPO and suffered three years of significant declines starting in 2010: -27.48, -43.96, and -12.82%. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Performance | Morningstar So going up 49.1% in 2013 would have been small comfort to someone buying at the IPO price.

The ten year annual average total return through the day of purchase was -4.68%.

Holdings as of 9/27/19:







Dividends: Semi-annual and barely relevant



Maximum Position: 100 shares

Current Position: 50 shares

Purchase Restriction: Small Ball Rule:

B. Bought 2 IBB at $99.18 and 1 at $96.86:





Quote: iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF Overview

Sponsor's Webpage: iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | IBB

Expense Ratio: .46% as of 6/30/19

Holdings: 219 as of 10/7/19

Some Top Holdings as of 10 /7/19:



I do not own any of the stocks listed in the preceding snapshot. I have bought and sold GILD and AMGN in the past.

Last DiscussedItem # 2.B. Bought 1 IBB at $100.16 (6/5/19 Post)Item # 4.A. (4/6/19 Post)

5 Year Chart: Up and down but going nowhere

Annual Average Total Return 5 Years Ending 10/7/19 = +2.44%

iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) Performance | Morningstar

Morningstar Rating at 2 Stars

Current Position: 10 shares

Maximum Position: 20 shares

Trading Restriction: Small Ball Rule

5. ADDED 50 ING at $9.96-Used Commission Free Trade



Quote: ING Groep N.V. ADR Overview

This is my first average down using the small ball trading rule.  

The first purchase was at $10.49 and was discussed here in Item # 2.

Current Position: 100 Shares

Average Cost Per share = $10.23

Maximum Position: 200 Shares 

I own ING in my Fidelity taxable account. I would not own this stock in a retirement account since the Netherlands will withhold a tax on the dividend payment; and there is no way to recover that tax when the stock is owned in a retirement account.   

Effective 10/10/19, Fidelity reduced its online trading commission to zero for U.S. stocks and ETFs. 

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

25 comments:

  1. Donald claimed that he reached a "very substantial phase one deal" with China.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/11/trump-says-us-has-come-to-a-substantial-phase-one-deal-with-china.html

    Based on what I have read so far, I would delete "very substantial" from the Duck's description and add "preliminary" before phase 1. At least he did not say that it was the best trade deal every negotiated in the universe's history since the Big Bang.

    The U.S. will forego raising the tariffs on $250B in imports from 25% to 30% which was scheduled to go into effect next Tuesday.

    In exchange China will buy about $40 to $50B in U.S. agricultural products which they probably need anyway.

    The details will be discussed over the next several weeks which may include something or another on financial services and intellectual property. The devil is always in the details.

    The Stock Jock's enthusiasm started to lose steam into the last 15 minutes of trading.

    S&P 500 Index 2,970.27 +32.14 +1.09%
    High: 2,993.28
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/spx?mod=home-page

    Maybe more details will be released later. The Stock Jocks may develop second thoughts over the weekend after digesting what actually happened rather than relying on Donald's characterization. There seemed to be some of that occurring already late in the trading day.

    The stock market remains primarily a decent one for traders given the jumping bean up and down moves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do you think there's any chance that early voting states (besides CA) will avoid Warren? While she polls well, I haven't seen state by state numbers yet.

    They tend to be moderate voters. She is not.

    Biden is too old and worn out. He's in need of #metoo adjustments which is a turn off/liability in general election. From a Jewish view, he's not been supportive, just in surface gloss, but not the underlying legislation and needs. Better than Warren. (Hopefully Bernie is out but he was a check on Warren.) There are better options than the front runners.

    My eyes are on AmyK and Booker. But I don't vote until the choices are narrowed. Both very capable of moderate and across the aisle and non-noisy yelling work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: Warren is ahead of Biden in the latest California polls.

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primaries/democratic/california/

      It is still up in the air IMO whether Bernie will continue his campaign. If he drops out, Warren will be the nominee.

      Booker and Amy are barely registering in the polls. Biden is taking away the more moderate voters from them so there is not that much air left for them to breathe.

      As I mentioned early, I am already started to cringe about having Warren and Trump as my choices. Trump would have his best shot at reelection with Warren as his opponent.

      A Booker-AmyK ticket would beat Trump.

      Delete
    2. Biden's a problem in this. If he was gone other choices would appear like AmkyK and Booker.

      I'm still hoping that the first votes are from more moderate areas and it puts a dent in the Warren and Bernie momentums.

      Bernie dropping out is a problem. He crazy base may not care that he had a heart attack, any more than that he's done nearly no legislation in the Senate when he was supposed to making all this difference he talks about.

      Warren isn't electable against Trump - not safely. Hopefully others are as concerned/aware and it effects voting. Polls wordings may not capture actual voting yet.

      Delete
    3. On Biden many years ago when he was just a senator, I lobbied for attention to an illness. I was assigned a small team with a father and very sick daughter from Delaware. He told me they'd visited before, Biden had been in his office so came out to greet them.

      Looked her up and down in the way perps do, then made some sexually loaded comment. I don't remember the exact comment, something about her being hot or approving of her. I know that comment from being female and hearing such things over the years when harassed. She was gorgeous about 15, and barely able to stand up, using a wheel chair often. I got to know them both after that. So my trust is very strong that it was exactly as told. There wasn't any motivation to lie anyway. We were just chatting at lunch between appointments.

      I've been grossed out every since.

      A sloppy person crosses boundaries and then instantly apologizes because they never meant to, and tries not to again.

      A perp looks for that pained discomfort and gets their jollies off it is. It is not possible that he missed that look and responding comments, all these years. He past Anita Hill history is consistent with it, and his apology to her left her speechless with it's coldness.

      So on a personal note that bothers me.

      In other ways, policies, he's not my candidate either.

      But I'll take him over Warren or Bernie. But wish they'd all disappear from the race and give others a chance to come forward who are younger and more centrist.

      Delete
    4. AmyK is getting a surge from the debate. I will give some money. I'd like her to make it to the next debate.

      So much of media claimed Warren's being seen a front runner. She is not my choice - and I don't think she'd do well against Trump.

      Delete
  3. Did my ING comment post? What's the factors for buying it? It's near lower resistence... so could be a bounce spot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope my ING comment didn't post. I had ING accounts that went bankrupt in 2008. Didn't realize they still traded. I guess since so big in Netherlands, they are still a big bank there. It's just the USA experiment that failed.

      Did they go bankrupt or sell to Captial One? So many of my banks disappeared it's hard to keep track of.

      I did like their management's attitude and easy to read fine print. Saved a lot of time. They were progressive about setting up online banking.

      What's interesting about it as a buy?

      Delete
    2. Land: I did not see a prior comment on ING. I would classify that buy as "contrarian value" with significant dividend support.

      I discussed it more fully in my 10/5 post:

      Item # 2
      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/10/observations-and-sample-of-recent_5.html

      The dividend yield will vary based on the EUR/USD conversion rate.

      If I took the prior year's total USD dividend payment per share of $.76, the dividend yield at my current total cost per share of $10.23 would be 7.43%.

      A lot of bad news is already baked into the current price, though the increase in loan defaults due to a recession is not baked into any stock price IMO that I have bought or will consider buying now.

      ING has the same net interest margin compression issue as U.S. banks.

      The shares have bounced nicely since my last purchase at $9.96 discussed in this post:

      ING Groep N.V. ADR $10.80 +$0.36 +3.45%
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ing

      According to Marketwatch, the current E.P.S. consensus for this year is at $1.43.
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ing/analystestimates

      The company is doing a decent job in lowering costs.

      The ADR share price will be determined by converting the Euro price for the ordinary shares traded in the Netherlands into USDs. So I would want the Euro to gain in value against the USD. That will probably be a struggle.


      https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=EUR&to=USD&view=1Y

      Delete
    3. Ah very interesting info.

      Good yield. Beaten down. Some currency risk that's not in full favor. Management making headway on their situation at least with costs.

      It's near that support. Plus all that great fireball orange colors on their literature (good branding still.)

      Hum. I can see buying it.

      Delete
    4. I had posted on ING but something in the way it posted made me think it had disappeared rather than deliver to your side of the blog comments.

      I posted about Biden & the election today. I'll see if they made it, when you post the pending comments.

      Delete
    5. Land: ING Direct in the U.S. did not go bankrupt. ING sold it to Capital One. I had an account with ING Direct which was transferred through that sale to Capital One. ING also sold its Sharebuilder brokerage business to ETrade. I had an account and transferred it to Fidelity before that transfer took place.

      ING also got rid of its insurance businesses through a spinoff into Voya Financial (VOYA).

      The banking operation in Europe made an early transition into digital banking.

      I have the stock on a small ball buying program of up to 200 shares in 50 share lots. I am currently at 100 shares. The next purchase will have to be below $9.96.

      I have also started to buy small positions in Credit Suisse (CS) and UBS, two other large European financial institutions whose stocks were justifiably shellacked and smashed to smithereens during and after the Near Depression. The CS buy is discussed in this post.

      Another European financial institution where I had an even smaller recent buy is Nordea (NRDBY)

      Delete
    6. I think it was netbank and 2 others of my banks that went bankrupt. I just considered the sell to capital one as the end of that. Like ING, can't stand capital one. I wasn't remembering well.

      Small ball buying everything is bought lower than the last, to force a climb down with pullbacks ....

      Delete
    7. Land: I still have a Capital One savings account but have been drawing the amounts down. I am scattered in financial accounts, with the Ing Direct/Capital One being one that I will eventually dump. The savings account rate is no longer competitive.

      I currently have 59 common stocks under the "small ball buying program".

      Basic Rules:

      (1) Each subsequent purchase has to be at the lowest price in the chain.

      (2) Purchase are made in small lots, almost entirely with commission free trades, though they have been some purchases in my IB account where the commission is $1.

      (3) On price pops, I will consider selling my highest cost lots at a profit.

      (4) Some positions are eliminated altogether on price pops when the goal is reached for that stock.

      The overall goal is to reduce risk through a controlled and largely mechanical trading strategy that realizes gains particularly on the highest cost lots, reduces my average cost per share and thereby increases my dividend yield.

      This particular trading strategy was developed as part of my capital preservation goal that permits measured and limited forays into risk assets to generate income and capital gains. Risks are tightly controlled by a variety of techniques including the small ball trading strategy for common stocks, preferred stocks and ETFs and the limited monetary exposure to each security mandated by that strategy.

      Bond risks are controlled through other means including limiting purchases to higher quality bonds (credit risk control), emphasizing shorter term maturities (interest rate risk control), trading (buying dips and selling pops), all in the context of a financial capability to hold all of them until maturity.

      The realized capital gain goal per year is currently over $30+K and is viewed as a supplement to dividend and interest income. The actual results have been $40+K in recent years but that want last and I may be in heading after this year for one or more years of <$30K.

      You mentioned focus in an earlier comment. I personally can not avoid being highly focused.

      Delete
    8. Focus
      Then I will happily use your updates to figure out what's happening. By not being able to, I meant because of drugs that knock me out.

      Good appt today though. Showing good response! and this stuff takes patience so there's a couple months to wait to see the full effects (without meds while waiting) and see what else is needed, if anything.

      Here's something to worry about. There's been a fuss over low blood tests in my results. Turns out they are machine read, and a good chance those reading were wrong. I happen to go to a different lab. A bunch of important numbers were completely different (and to my favor). So the machine uses AI to recognize types of cells. Apparently wasn't doing well with mine. Doctor should have had a manual read done automatically to double check. Who would have expected?

      I like this as way to mitigate risks in an automated way, so it's easier to follow.

      Delete
    9. Land: That is good to hear. AI has a ways to go. I read an article yesterday about a robot solving a rubik's cube with its fingers after it was randomly scramble. I almost wrote with his fingers.

      https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/10/15/20910007/robot-rubiks-cube-one-handed

      Delete
    10. Wow that's pretty amazing.

      Will come in handy for self-driving cars.

      There is an algorithm for the cube. I got bored with twisting and described what I'd figured it was, to a friend who'd done it many times, and it was the algorithm. But this part about using computer learning at computer speeds, for the robot to then be able to make adjustments is quite an invention.

      The first part that's amazing is that it can move the cube with those "fingers."

      I wonder if "AI" as a gitchy code word is the next 3-D printing type run up?

      Delete
  4. "A Trump hotel mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms "

    Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sondland I hear will be testifying after all. He got the subpoena and won't break the law not to testify.

    Yovanovitch may have finally put a crack in that wall. We'll have to see what color the cement is that they use to fill it. "Phosphorous orange" to please the king?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: Yovanovitch testified notwithstanding Donald ordering her to stay away and it appears that Sondland may do the same. I read somewhere that Sondland will not be producing documents however. It remains murky whether Sondland will claim executive privilege on a number of issues.

      The general thrust now is that more people with knowledge will obey a subpoena rather than submit to Donald's legally baseless obstruction efforts.

      However, there is no amount of evidence on the Ukraine matter that will cause more than 3 republican senators to vote for a conviction.

      Most of them can not even say that it was "inappropriate".

      Senator Cory Gardner, for example, refused to answer 5 times a simple question whether it was inappropriate for a President to seek a foreign nation's assistance in digging up dirt (manufacturing in the Biden case) on his political opponents.

      Gardner is up for reelection in 2020 in Colorado and he does not want to lose the Trumpsters since he will need everyone of them if he is to have a chance against the likely democrat nominee and former governor John Hickenlooper who is a moderate. I currently have the democrats picking up that senate seat.

      Delete
    2. Some cracks but lots of "in country a pickle" still.

      Maybe maybe...

      Our biggest hope, is that Trump does something else to tick off a whole lot more people.

      It won't be, being nice to a black person which would bug much of his base.

      Delete
  6. In Barron's, the former general counsel at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is quoted as saying the "markets have been extraordinarily gullible" in accepting Trump's characterization of the trade negotiations. The so called very substantial phase 1 "deal" is actually "very preliminary" in his words, and nothing more than an agreement in principle to negotiate a limited agreement in mine.

    Importantly, the existing tariffs remain in effect and the major issues appear to be left to Phase 2 or Phase 3 or whatever may become Donald's description hereafter.

    And, in many respects, the trade wars have widened to include new U.S. tariffs on Europe's exports and more Chinese companies being blacklisted.

    Nothing has happened to change the adverse economic impacts that are flowing from the trade wars.

    And, as I have argued many times in the past, the Stock Jocks are delusional in believing the FED can alter the current path by cutting a short term rate, which is already abnormally low, closer to zero. The problems have nothing to do with rates being too high.

    More problems are probably being created by the already extremely low interest rates including massive misallocations of cash to non-productive assets likely to create financial instability and deprivation of income from risk free investments that reduce disposable income and source more consumer spending from debt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel more comfortable buying lower rates for longer (5 years) then I normally would. Because of the central banks rush to outdue each other with low rates...

      Delete
  7. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/10/observations-and-sample-of-recent_16.html

    ReplyDelete