Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Observations and Sample of Recent Trades: BIF, ECON, FFHPRG, HUSKF, IBB, NMFC, OFS

Economy


Japan surpasses China as largest foreign holder of U.S. TreasurysForeign Holders of U.S. Debt: U.S. Treasury Data Series (last data is through August 2019)

Trump expected to delay European auto tariffs for 6 months, report says I seriously doubt Donald will levy those tariffs before the election. 


What is RCEP? Asia-Pacific trade deal slated to be world's largest FTA


Donald claimed yesterday that the Phase 1 trade deal with China was "close" to completion. Trump calls U.S.-China deal ‘close’ in speech 


+++++++

Markets and Market Commentary

‘Fear of missing out’ triggers huge fund manager shift from cash to stocks, Bank of America Merrill Lynch says - MarketWatch This kind of reallocation is not based on valuation and can be quickly reversed when the worm starts to turn creating a bull rush for the exit door.  



++++++

Trump:

Bill Moyers commented that he fears for America for the first time in his life. Bill Moyers says he fears for America for 'first time' - CNN Video I would agree with his statement that a "democracy can die of too many lies" and "we're getting close to the terminal moment". 


Trump's Tax Returns

Which Trump Will Take the Fall for Years of Tax Fraud? | Vanity FairNever-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies — ProPublica


Donald is pulling out all of the stops to prevent investigators from examining his tax returns. Judge sides with NY officials in Trump tax return lawsuit | TheHill


++

Impeachment-Ukraine:

The live testimony will start soon. Many will watch the witnesses through partisan lenses or simply have their approved commentators like Sean Hannity spin the testimony for them. Facts do not matter to the Trumpsters. 

A few minds may be changed but most voters have already formed an opinion that is unlikely to change.

I admittedly have formed an opinion based on a review of the evidence so far, but my mind can always be changed by reliable information. 

When watching or reading the testimony, a judgement needs to be rendered on whether Donald has been straight with the voters or has lied and mislead them.

Donald has repeatedly claimed there was no quid pro quo, no linkage whatsoever between his decision to withhold military aid and his request that Ukraine investigate both the Bidens and the baseless conspiracy that it was the Ukraine who interfered in the 2016 U.S. election against him by stealing the DNC emails and blaming it on the Russians. Republican conspiracy theories do not need factual support, nor is it even necessary for them to make any sense. 




Republican House members generated a memo outlining how to defend Trump: (1) attack the witnesses against him and (2) steadfastly maintain that Donald did nothing wrong. Republicans, Planning Impeachment Defense, Argue Trump Did Nothing Wrong - The New York Times


Some of Demagogue Don's rants from Monday:






Sondland’s Lawyer Shoots Down Trump’s Baseless Claim of Transcript Alternation There were some redactions to protect classified information and the  which was done in cooperation with officials from the Trump Administration. The name of the whistleblower disclosed by republicans was also redacted. Whistleblower name redacted from Alexander Vindman transcriptCommittees Release Ambassador Bill Taylor’s Deposition Transcript as Part of Impeachment Inquiry | Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Witnesses are allowed to view the transcripts before they are released. 

Republicans will be allowed to call some witnesses, three have already been scheduled, contrary to the statement made by the Duck.  


2 White House officials say Mulvaney helped coordinate Ukraine pressure campaign


Pentagon official testifies Trump directed freeze on aid to Ukraine


Trump’s demands of Ukraine came down to three words: ‘investigations, Biden and Clinton,’: Deputy Secretary of State George Kent sworn testimony

Trump wanted Barr to hold news conference saying the president broke no laws in call with Ukrainian leader

Republicans attempt to move impeachment inquiry away from Trump The strategy of the House republicans will be to focus on their conspiracy theories rather than Trump's conduct. 


In Louisiana, Trump Attacks ‘Deranged’ Impeachment Inquiry and ‘Radical’ Governor The "radical" democrat governor is pro-gun, anti-abortion and a former Army officer.  


Bolton suggests Trump foreign policy guided by personal interest


Adam Schiff Signals ‘Bribery’ Charge for Trump’s Impeachment: Founders Understood It as ‘Breach of the Public Trust’ I previously discussed that the authors of the Constitution had a broader definition of bribery than the criminal charge codified in a U.S. statute today. Bribery is specifically listed in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment. 

Trump Has Considered Firing Intelligence Community Inspector General  The Duck, in full authoritarian mode, wanted to fire the Inspector General of the intelligence community for finding the whistleblower's complaint credible after conducting an investigation and reporting the existence of the complaint to Congress after Donald tried to keep it from Congress.  



+++


Roger Stone and Trump


It is not surprising that Roger Stone, a former "political operative" for Richard Nixon, found a kindred spirit in Trump. 'Prepare to die' Trump adviser Stone texted witness, trial jury hearsRoger Stone: Donald Trump ally faces trial as part of Russia probe 


Stone was used by Donald to gain access to information from Wikileaks about hacked emails relating to Hillary. The Dirty Trickster | The New Yorker  Stone was an associate of Roy Cohn, another person who reflects Donald's inner self. How Donald Trump and Roy Cohn’s Ruthless Symbiosis Changed America | Vanity Fair 


The Roger Stone Trial: What’s Left of the Mueller Investigation - Lawfare


Donald Trump Apparently Thought Roger Stone Had Inside Information On WikiLeaks 

I have reviewed summaries of the evidence presented during Stone's criminal trial and view it more likely than not that the jury will return a not guilty verdict. That does not mean that Stone is innocent of the criminal charges but only that the proof was insufficient to convict using the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt proof standard. 


++++

Trump Organization ordered to pay $290,000 after losing battle against Scottish wind farm - The Washington Post Donald hates wind farms since in his opinion they cause cancer. Donald Trump's ridiculous link between cancer, wind turbines | PolitiFact That has to be true since Doofus Don is the smartest person who has lived on this planet or anywhere in the universe for that matter. Just ask him and he will confirm. 

++++++

All trades are commission free except as otherwise noted: 

1. Canadian Reset Equity Preferred Stocks

A. Bought 50 FFHPRG at C$14.54 (C$1 IB Commission)



My current approach for Canadian reset equity preferred stocks is to buy 50 shares and then consider averaging down with another 50 share lot. 

Owning several reset equity preferred stocks from the same issuer allows me to mix quarterly resets over the 3 month Canadian T Bill and five year resets at spreads over the 5 year Canadian bond. I can also have a mix of reset dates that permit some planning for potential interest rate scenarios. 

Current Positions in Fairfax Financial Preferred Stocks: 



FFHPRG is an equity reset preferred stock that pays cumulative dividends at a 2.56% spread to the five year Canadian government bond. The coupon resets every five year with the next reset scheduled in September 2020. 

The next reset is likely to result in a dividend increase. Canada 5 Year Government Bond Overview | MarketWatch

The 2015 reset resulted in a 3.318% coupon, which indicates that the 5 year Canadian government bond was then at .758%. 


The 5 year Canadian government bond closed at a 1.58% yield yesterday. 

Current Penny Rate at 3.318% =  C$.207375 per share

Current Dividend Yield at C$14.24 = 5.78%

Prospectus Excerpt: 


If the 5 year Canadian government bond had a 1.6% yield on the next reset date calculation date, the coupon for the next five year period would become 4.16% and the dividend yield would rise to 7.25% at C$14.34

2. Bought 50 NMFC at $13.42:




Quote: New Mountain Finance Corp.   (NMFC)

Website: New Mountain Finance Corporation

Closing Price Yesterday: NMFC $13.47 +$0.09 +0.67% 


SEC Filings


10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/19 List of investments starts at page 8.


This brings me up to 150 shares with the other 100 shares owned in my Fidelity account. Item # 2.A. Bought 100 NMFC at $13.37  (9/18/19 Post) I received the last quarterly dividend for that 100 share lot. 


Management: External 


Dividends: Quarterly at $.34 ($1.36 annually) The dividend has been at the same penny rate for 31 straight quarters.  


NMFC has on occasion paid a special dividend during that period. The last special dividend was $.12 per share paid in 2014. There were special dividends paid in 2012 and 2013 totalling $.49 per share. 


Next Ex Dividend: 12/12/19 


Reinvestment: No, since the stock is selling near its net asset value per share.  


Dividend Yield at a TC of $13.42 = 10.13%


Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/19): Okay IMO 


Net investment income per share was $.36, or 2 cents higher than the quarterly dividend. 


"At September 30, 2019, net asset value (“NAV”) per share was $13.35, compared to 13.41 at June 30, 2019." 




Risk Ratings for Investments: 




Pages 99-100 SEC Form 10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/19


New Mountain Finance Corporation Announces Financial Results for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2019 


CEO Robert Hamwee on Q3 2019 Results - Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha


Goal: Total Return in excess of the total dividend amount. 


New Mountain Finance Corporation Announces Completion of Offering of 9,200,000 Shares of Common Stock (10/25/19 Post) Public stock offerings will occur periodically. The last one was absorbed well by the market.


5 Year Annual Average Total Return Through 11/8/19 = 8.43%


The total average annual return over the past 5 years is less than the dividend yield. This would indicate that the stock price was higher than now on the start date and/or dividend reinvestments occurred at higher prices than the current price. 


This is the daily numbers for NMFC between 11/7/14 through 11/20/14: 





The closing price on Friday 11/7/14 was at $14.53. 


A five year chart would reveal periods where the reinvestment of the quarterly dividend would be at a higher price than now. NMFC | New Mountain Finance Corp. Advanced Charts | MarketWatch (chart marks dividend payment dates)


3. Small Ball ETF and CEF Trading-Working to Lower Average Cost-Sell Rallies-Buy Dips (All Commission Free):


A. Sold 5 IBB at $109.7:




Quote: iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF Overview

Sponsor's Website: Ishares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | IBB

Closing Price Yesterday: IBB $110.38 +$0.34 +0.31% 

Renewed confidence in Amgen is helping this ETF. AMGN 1 Year Chart 

History:




Profit Snapshot: +$3.49 




Item # 6.A. Bought 5 IBB at $109 (2/17/19 Post)


Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 4.B. Bought 2 IBB at $99.18 and 1 at $96.86(10/11/19 Post)Item # 4.A. Bought 1 IBB at $103.86 (4/6/19 Post)


5 Year Chart: Up and down going nowhere (price spiked to over $132 in July 2015)


Morningstar Rating at 3 Stars (up from 2 stars when I last discussed this ETF) 


Maximum Position: 20 shares


Current Position: 5 shares


Average Cost Per Share = $99.87

Purchase Restriction and Trading Rules: Small Ball 


B. Sold 50 ECON at $22.96:




Quote: Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF Overview


Closing Price Yesterday: ECON $22.77 -$0.13 -0.57% 

Sponsor's Website: ECON | Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF


Expense Ratio: .59%


Profit Snapshot: $35.98 




Item # 4 Bought 50 ECON at $22.24 (4/3/19 Post)


Last Discussed Item # 3.A. Bought 10 ECON at $21.68 (9/7/19 Post)Item # 4.A. Bought 5 ECON at $21.96  (6/29/19 Post)


Current Position: 15 shares


Maximum Position: 100 shares


Purchase Restriction and Trading Rules: Small Ball


Lowest Price in Current Chain: $21.68

C. Sold 50 BIF at $11.28:





Quote: Boulder Growth & Income Fund Inc. (BIF)

Sponsor's Website: Boulder Funds - Home

BIF Boulder Growth & Income-CEF Connect


SEC Form N-Q: Portfolio Holdings as of 8/31/19 (cost $594+M, value at 1.334+B)


Largest Position as of 8/31/19:





Profit Snapshot: +$1.63




Item # 1 Bought 50 BIF at $11.25  (5/8/19 Post) I selected this lot for disposition rather than use FIFO since it was my highest cost lot.


Position Before Pare-Average Cost Per Share $10.76





Position After Pare-Average Cost Per Share $10.61



Snapshot Intra-Day 11/1/19
Last Discussed: Item # 3 Bought 20 BIF at $10.55 and 30 at $10.18-Used Commission Free Trades (1/5/19 Post)Item # 3 Bought 100 BIF at $10.73 (11/25/18 Post)

Last Elimination: Item # 3.B. Eliminated BIF: Sold 116+ (2/16/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $137.25) That post contains snapshots of prior trades. The first round trip ended in 2013.


Dividend: Quarterly at $.102 per share


Last Ex Dividend Date: 10/22/19


Dividend Reinvestment Yes when the likely reinvestment price is at a greater than 10% discount to net asset value per share


BIF Trading Profits to Date: +$423.07


Purchase Restriction: None

4. Eliminations and Pares:

A. Sold 50 HUSKY at US$7.64-Commission Free at Schwab:



Quote: Husky (HUSKF) - USD Priced Shares Pink Sheet Exchange


Closing Price Yesterday: HUSKF $7.74 -$0.04 -0.51% 


Website: Husky Energy


Profit Snapshot: +$31.89




Item # 1. Bought 50 HUSKF at $6.9 (8/21/19 Post)


Last Earnings Report: Unfavorable


Husky Energy Reports Third Quarter 2019 Results


I received one quarterly dividend.


Dividend Quarterly at C$.125 per share


Husky Energy Announces Third Quarter 2019 Dividend and Fourth Quarter 2019 Preferred Shares Dividend Payments


I will consider a re-entry at less than $6.5 per share.


B. Pared OFS in Fidelity Account-Sold Highest Cost lots at $12:




Quote: OFS Capital Corp.  (OFS)

Website: Homepage - OFS Capital
OFS SEC Filings
2018 Annual Report (risk summary starts at page 25 and ends at page 51)

Subsequent to the third quarter report, the analyst at Ladenburg Thalmann downgraded OFS to neutral from buy and removed the $13 price target. The reasons are summarized here: Ladenburg Thalmann downgrades OFS Capital to 'neutral' | S&P Global Market Intelligence (may require scrolling down to find) The main reasons appear to be the decline in net asset value per share, as I discuss below; and the increase in underperforming debt investments from 8% to 15%. Both are matters of legitimate concern. 


Management: External


Profit Snapshot: +$13.11




Item # 3.B. Bought 20 OFS at $11.7 (10/17/18 Post)Item # 1.C. Added 10 OFS at $11.3 (10/21/18 Post)


Average Cost Per Share Before Pare: $10.79




Average Cost After Pare: $10.4



Snapshot 11/8/19 During Trading Day 
Dividend: Quarterly at $.36 per share excluding special dividends (regular dividend at $1.36 annually)

Dividend yield at Total Average Cost (this account) =  13.08%


Next Ex Dividend Date: 12/23/19


Reinvestment: Yes, in this account when the likely reinvestment price is likely to be at a 5% or higher discount to the last reported net asset value per share)l   at greater


Goal: A realized total return in excess of the total dividend amount which is always the case for a BDC. 


Lowest Priced Lot in this Chain: 20 shares at $9.61 (12/18/18)


Ownership Other Account
I also own shares in my Schwab where I have worked the average cost per share down to $10.1. 


Chart Since IPO: Suggests Trading Strategy 





Net Asset Value Per Share History:

The recent trend starting in 2017 is worrisome. 


The decline in the third quarter precipitated the pare of my highest cost lots held in my Fidelity account. .  


9/30/19:   $12.74


6/30/19:   $12.95   Page 2 10-Q  


3/31/19     $13.04   10-Q


12/31/18    $13.10

6/30/18     $13.70
03/31/18   $13.67
12/31/17    $14.12
12/31/16   $14.82
12/31/15    $14.76
12/31/14    $14.24
12/31/13    $14.54

IPO Offering Price at $15 (November 2012) with proceeds after the underwriters' discount at $13.05 Final Prospectus Supplement


Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/19: 


NII per share was reported at $.36 per share, which was in line with the consensus estimate. Net asset value per share sank 1.62% to $12.74 from $12.95 as of 6/30/19. 


"As of September 30, 2019, floating rate loans as a percentage of fair value comprised 90% of OFS Capital’s debt investment portfolio, with the remaining 10% in fixed rate loans."




I would highlight two negatives. The first is the worrisome decline in net asset value per share. The second is that NII per share just covers the $.36 per share dividend.  


OFS Capital Corporation Announces Third Quarter 2019 Financial Results 


CEO Bilal Rashid on Q3 2019 Results-Seeking Alpha


Last Sell DiscussionItem # 3 Pared OFS-Sold Highest Cost Lots in Schwab Account: 50 Shares at $12.47 and 50 Shares at $12.27 (5/5/19 Post)


Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 3B. Bought 10 OFS at $9.95 and 20 at $9.61 Using Fidelity Commission Free Trades (1/9/19 Post)Item # 4.B. Bought 10 OFS at $11.07 and 10 at $10.75 Used Fidelity Commission Free Trades (11/11/18 Post)


OFS Baby Bonds:


OFS has an exchange trade SU baby bond: OFS Capital Corp. 6.375% Notes due 2025 (OFSSL)Prospectus 


On 10/12/18, OFS sold $48.11+M (with the greenshoe) in principal amount of 6.5% senior unsecured notes maturing on 10/31/25. OFS Capital Corporation Prices Public Offering of $43,500,000 6.50% Notes Due 2025 


OFS recently issued another senior unsecured bond with a 5.95% coupon that matures in 2026: OFSSI | OFS Capital Corp. 5.95% Notes due 2026 OverviewProspectus


Currently I am not interested in those baby bonds. When and if there is a substantial rise in intermediate term interest rates, provoking panic selling of those notes and accompanying significant price declines, I may take a look see.


With senior unsecured debt, it is important to evaluate how that debt may be subordinated in the capital structure:



Subordination Summary
C. Eliminated OFS IB Account-Sold 50 Shares at $11.93: See discussion above



Profit snapshot: $44.62



Item # 2 Bought 50 OFS at $11 (8/3/19 Post) I received one quarterly dividend and did not reinvest it. 

OFS Realized Gains to Date = $127.28  (selling highest cost lots)


While the realized gain is nominal, the trading activity so far is viewed as successful for the following reasons: (1) I have realized a profit after harvesting dividend payments so my total return exceeds the dividend amount which is how I define success for BDC positions; and (2) I have traded the position down to my lowest cost shares which increases my dividend yield and reduces my risk given the lower monetary exposure.    


Remaining OFS Positions: 


Fidelity: 58+ shares average cost per share at $10.4

Schwab:  60+ shares average cost per share at $10.1


5. Short Term Bond Ladder Basket Strategy-Tennessee Municipal Bonds


I am going to classify the following Tennessee municipal bond as a short term one, even though it matures in 2036. 


The issuer has the optional right to call on or after 6/1/21 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest. 


That call is highly likely to happen on 6/1/21. 


It would take a major move up in interest rates for the issuer to delay calling it. 


A. Bought 5 Johnson City Tennessee 3.25% GO Bonds Maturing on 6/1/2036 (price includes a $1 per bond Commission)




Johnson City - Google Maps


I paid $73.13 to the seller in accrued interest. I will receive that sum back and a few more dollars when the issuer makes a semi-annual payment on 12/1/19. 


I will then receive 3 more semi-annual payments totaling $243.75 before the likely call on 6/1/21 whereupon I will lose $72.9 on the bond. Netting the interest payments out with the bond loss, I will be up about $177.  


The YTM on a yield to worst basis, which assumes a call on 6/1/21, is 2.287% at my total cost of 101.438. On the day of my purchase, the 2 year treasury closed at a 1.68% yield with the 1 year at 1.58%. Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates


The current tax free yield would be higher at 3.2039%.    


This Johnson City bond purchase is another comparatively less bad buy compared to treasuries and CDs. 


Emma Page


Optional Call: At par value on or after 6/1/21. 


Credit Rating: Aa2 by Moody's 


Security and Optional Call Provision from Offering Statement: 




DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

14 comments:

  1. The stock market shrugged off a WSJ report that snags have developed in the "Phase 1" trade negotiations with China.

    The Stock Jocks are just not concerned about a blowup happening.

    I am very uncomfortable with the stock market now. I have resisted the urge to sell my remaining stock mutual funds due to a lack of alternatives and the cash buildup already occurring almost on a daily basis from maturing CDs, treasury bills and investment grade corporate bonds. At some point in the skyward move, I will part ways with them and just wait for the next debacle.

    I am in a hyper trading mode as my way to deal with what I perceive as elevated downside risks due in large part to multiple expansion while earnings growth is slowing and turning negative Y-O-Y in many cases.

    I am in a net selling mode now, primarily involving either the sell of my highest cost lots when I can do so profitably or the elimination of some positions altogether. I am particularly likely to sell longer term losers that managed to move into profit territory recently with COTY and SNR being two examples.

    Some of the proceeds receiving from maturity securities are being redirected into Tennessee municipal bonds.

    +++

    I noticed that there is an anomaly in the pricing of FOMX and will offer here one possible explanation which I will discuss in more depth in my next post.

    As previously discussed FOMX agreed to sell itself to Menlo whereby each FOMX share would be exchange for .5924 Menlo share (forget about the rest)

    Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (FOMX)
    $3.55 +$0.14 +4.11%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fomx

    Menlo Therapeutics Inc.
    $4.68 -$0.11 -2.30%

    If the merger closed today, for example, each FOMX share would be valued at $2.77 but the closing FOMX price today was at a +28% premium to that number.

    It would not be rational to expect Menlo to come up with a better offer. Its shares have already tanked in response to the exchange offer in place.

    The only rational explanation is that some Stock Jocks believe someone will swoop in and offer FOMX a better deal, but that is speculation based on publicly available information.

    I would assume that FOMX looked at other alternatives after deciding to put itself in play. Maybe there was no offer or maybe there was one or more but FOMX's Board for whatever reason decided to go with the MNLO offer. We may find out soon enough if there is another possible acquirer who believes that they had a superior offer. I do not know if there is any breakup fee or who pays it if there is one. I have not researched that issue yet since no other offer is publicly available. I can only say that I would not be pleased if the Board turned down a cash offer of $8 or higher into to go with this take under stock exchange with a smaller company that has one clinical stage compound whose patent may expire in 2030 or 2033 depending on who is making the claim.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "This kind of reallocation is not based on valuation and can be quickly reversed when the worm starts to turn creating a bull rush for the exit door. "

    If this sets up and the worm turns, would you expect the VIX model may apply again and there'd be little need to panic until the recovery after the first big "dip." Maybe won't get back to the top, but will be better than selling now in wait, or selling after the first pullback.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: The VIX Model is still flashing a green light signal for the S & P 500.

      Conditions are favorable for further advances given the low volatility.

      Extreme volatility creates anxiety and fear and tends to create a sell and flee reaction.

      When there is a Trigger Event, as defined in the Model, the S & P 500 index would have already fallen significantly. In the past, when that has happened after a long period of rising stock prices and low volatility, there has been a Recovery Period when stocks regain upside momentum and the VIX returns to below 20 movement after meeting the strict Trigger Event conditions as defined by prior historical examples.

      The Recovery Period may not occur after a future Trigger Event , based on the circumstances then existing.

      The historical examples indicate that the investor will have a better opportunity to lighten up on their stock allocations after the VIX returns to below 20 movement than during the Trigger Event period when the market would be in a significant decline mode.

      The August 2007 Trigger Event, for example, was followed by new highs in October 2007 accompanied by a VIX move back below 20.

      Forming an opinion about whether or not there will be a Recovery Period will depend on the facts then existing.

      Starting In February 2007, there was a whiff of major problems in subprime and Alt-A mortgages and that whiff had became an aroma that smelled bad in the summer of 2007.

      However, it was not clear to most informed investors that what was about to happen would likely happen.

      So that consensus opinion with now well known dissents led to a rally into October 2007.

      Uncertainty about the depth of rot continued through the Spring and Summer of 2008, but that uncertainty was removed in September 2008 and the rot was revealed as extensive and capable of causing another Great Depression. The VIX movement after October 2007 through August 2008 was a whipsaw pattern indicating major panic attacks followed by calm, reflecting the uncertainty about the depth of the rot.

      Delete
    2. Umm, that one questionmark does seem to make it important to keep one's wits around when judging the timing of the situation... since it's not certain that the bounce back of disbelief that leads to short recovery may not be all that high. I remember in one of the back tests, it wasn't. In another it was much higher.

      Delete
  3. Do you think it more likely Stone had wiki access to info. Or more likely he was puffing himself up but didn't?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: There is some evidence that Stone had established contact with Wikileaks about the stolen emails of either the DNC and/or John Podesta.

      Based on what I have reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether he actually had that contact or was merely claiming to Trump campaign officials that he did.

      Of the criminal charges made against Stone, the one where he is the must vulnerable is witness tampering involving the testimony of Randy Credico who was identified by Stone as his intermediary with Wikileaks.

      Stone sent to Credico clearly threatening messages urging him not to testify or to cooperate with the Mueller investigation. In one text, Stone stated that Credico should “Prepare to die” if he cooperated. Credico testified at Stone’s trial that he never was an intermediary.

      Stone had another intermediary, identified by the government as Jerome Corsi, who did not testify at trial.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Corsi

      Delete
    2. The jury convicted Roger Stone on all counts.

      https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/15/politics/roger-stone-trial-verdict/index.html

      It will be interesting to see whether Stone turns state's witness against Donald in exchange for a lighter sentence. I doubt it, but he may not want to spend the remainder of his life in the slammer. He is 67, but can remain free pending appeal.

      I would have trouble voting for conviction other than on the witness tampering charge using a guilt beyond a reasonable doubt standard. But I only read summaries of the testimony, including one witness whose credibility was in question, and only looked at some of the documents.

      Delete
    3. Tone of voice can make a difference. Stone's own ahem-type behavior could have made a difference in impression...

      Delete
    4. Land: Stone did not testify.

      It would have been counterproductive for his defense; and he would have probably opened himself up to even more perjury charges.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/15/roger-stone-jurors-deliver-verdict-trump-ally-trial-over-wikileaks/4187429002/

      A jury can develop an impression about a defendant from the testimony and evidence without their testimony simply based on the testimony and evidence. That evidence could have convinced the jury members that he was just a bad person, making it easier to lean toward conviction rather than a not guilty verdict, with the evidence sealing the deal for them.

      Delete
    5. That makes sense. Plus he's sitting at the table. The judge had to keep admonishing him on public and media behavior. I don't know if the jury was in the room, but if so, that would impact too.

      Delete
    6. Land: I doubt that the jury was aware of any admonishments unless they disobeyed the instruction and read news articles about the case. Your average juror would not know anything about Stone before being impaneled. Any prior knowledge would be brought out in voir dire.

      I doubt that any knowledge about the court's gag order, which goes back to early this year, was known to the jurors but would not influence a normal person's opinion about guilt or innocences if anyone knew. The purpose is prevent the parties from trying to prejudice a jury pool before one is selected through extra judicial statements.

      I have been following his antics since the Nixon years. It is interesting the kind of characters that Nixon and Donald both attract and rely upon.

      The fact that Donald acted on a conspiracy theory that Ukraine rather than Russia hacked the emails, which had been thoroughly debunked, is not surprising, but it is also frightening that any President would be so easily duped when formulating U.S. foreign policy.

      Delete
    7. Trump doesn't live in reality. He doesn't have a concept of concrete existence of a factual reality. So he both invents reality because as far as he's concerned, that is what people are supposed to do. He also in the same way can be sold on any reality that fits his emotional needs.

      The book "Duty to Warn" has one chapter on delusion both on it's owe and in relation to sociopathy. The author didn't diagnose but it was hard to miss the match to the criteria.

      Delete
  4. CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP)
    Close on 11/14: $26.69 -$1.40 (-4.98%)
    Pre Market Today: $25.20 -$1.49 (-5.58%)
    Pre-Market: 8:34AM EST
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/CNP?p=CNP


    I started a small ball buying program in CNP but stopped since the price went up after my first two purchases.

    August 28, 2019 Post
    Item # 1.A. Bought 20 CNP at $27.72 and 10 at $27.39
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/08/observations-and-sample-of-recent_28.html

    Yesterday, I knew that the Credit Suisse analyst had downgraded the PT to $31 from $32 but maintained its outperform rating.

    I also knew that the Texas Utilities Commission was meeting yesterday and would likely decide a rate case for CNP's major subsidiary Houston Electric.

    The waterfall action late in the day suggested that the decision was unfavorable, but I did not know how unfavorable or any of the details.

    The small ball program required me to buy at lower prices so I bought two 10 share lots near the close with the second being a few minutes before the close bringing me up to 50 shares.

    After the close, the CS analyst provided some details about what happened; and it was worse than expected. He downgraded the PT for the second time that day, going to $28 per share and changing the rating from outperform to neutral.

    Other brokers are heading for the exits as well. SunTrust downgraded from buy to hold as did Guggenheim. I do not have access to those reports.

    I do have access through my Schwab account to the CS analyst report which I find useful.

    The rate decision yesterday is unfavorable to CNP and can be arguably characterized as punitive.

    Shorter term, the price today will probably reflect the near term hit to earnings.

    Longer term, it remains to be seen whether the commission will allow Texas utilities to earn a fair rate of return on their rate base.

    The CS analyst reduced the 2020 and 2021 E.P.S. estimates by a dime to $1.66 and $1.71 respectively.

    The analyst forecasts that the order will require CNP to sell more common stock in its ongoing ATM stock offerings that will dilute earnings by 4 cents in those two years which I assume is included in his lower E.P.S. forecasts.

    There is some leeway in the forecast based on a review of the final written order.

    I will continue to buy shares under the small ball purchase restriction until I hit 100 shares.

    The dividend yield is moving up.

    Earnings are still influenced by the weather and customer growth in addition to the electric rates allowed by the commission and the assets included in the rate base.

    The allowed ROE was 9.25% compared to the company's request of 10.5%.

    The national average was 9.6% allowed ROE in 2018.

    And, it remains to be seen how long the commission will remain in a punitive mode.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/11/observations-and-sample-of-recent_16.html

    ReplyDelete