Thursday, January 2, 2020

AKBA, FFHPRI:CA, JCAP, PNNT, PPL

Economy




+++++



Barron's names 10 top stocks for 2020 - Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) | Seeking Alpha I currently own 2 of the 10 stocks mentioned in that article: Royal Dutch Shell and ViacomCBS (VIAC). 


+++++

Trump

Giuliani says he's 'more of a Jew' than Holocaust survivor George Soros

Trump Justice Department sues to seize private property for border-wall construction - MarketWatch While the U.S. government can seize private property, just compensation has to be paid to the owners. Private landowners can contest in court what is fair compensation and present other arguments that may be appropriate under the circumstances. 


The end result is almost no part of the wall has been built. There has been some replacement of border fencing.   


Acquiring Private Land Is Slowing Trump's Border Wall : NPR

Trump’s misleading “border wall” narrative | The Fact Checker - YouTube

6 ways the border wall could disrupt the environment: National GeographicHomeland Security To Waive Environmental Rules On Border Wall Projects- NPR


The 5 republican Supreme Court Justices lifted a lower court injunction that prevented Donald from using funds appropriated by Congress for other uses. When giving Donald what he wants, those Justices will be inclined to create powers for the President that usurp the enumerated Constitutional powers of Congress. Opinion | On the Border Wall, the Supreme Court Caves to Trump - The New York Times They may dodge this particular  issue on the merits as noted in this 5 to 4 memorandum order while giving Donald what he wants. Trump v. Sierra Club (07/26/2019)  


Trump: “I have an Article II where I have the right to do whatever I want as president.” Remarks by President Trump at Turning Point USA's Teen Student Action Summit 2019 | The White House


++++

All trades are commission-free unless otherwise noted. 

1. Added 50 FFHPRI at C$16.55 (C$1 commission at IB)




Quote: FFH-PI.TO 


Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd | Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series I (FFH.PRI.CA) Information Page | Preferred Stock Channel


Issuer:  Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. (Canada: Toronto) 

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited: Third Quarter Financial Results 

Security: Reset Equity Preferred Stock 


Par Value: C$25


Prospectus Excerpt: 



Coupon: 2.85% spread to the 5 year Canadian Bond, resets every five years 

Last Reset: December 2015 


This reset resulted in a 3.708% coupon for five years. Fairfax Announces Reset Dividend Rate on Its Series I Preferred Shares


For the initial five year period ending in December 2015, the issuer paid a 5% fixed rate coupon. The first reset resulted in a significant coupon decrease.  


The current quarterly penny rate is C$.23175 per share/unit (C$.927 annually)


The yield at a C$16.55 TC at this penny rate is 5.6%.   


Last Ex-Dividend Date: 12/12/19


Dividends: Cumulative and quarterly 


Next Reset: December 2020


Canada 5 Year Government Bond Overview | MarketWatch

Current Position: 150 shares/units


I can not find any discussion of the previous purchase. 


Fairfax Announces Reset Dividend Rate on Its Series C Preferred Shares and Quarterly Dividend on Series C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K and M Preferred Shares and Quarterly Dividend Rate for Series D, F, H and J Shares  


Current Holdings FFH Preferred Resets




FFHPRD resets quarterly at a 3.15% spread to the 3-month Canadian government note. One interest rate risk for this type of reset is that short-term rates will decline. The benefit is that the coupon will reset quickly when short-term rates are rising. Item # 5 Added 50 FFHPRD at C$16.32 (10/5/19 Post)Item # 2 Bought 50 FFHPRD at C$16.84


FFHPRF resets quarterly at a 2.16% spread to the 3-month Canadian government note. Item # 1 Bought 100 FFHPRF at C$12.36 Update For Exchange Traded Bond And Preferred Stock Basket Strategy As Of April 1, 2016 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha


FFHPRG resets every 5 years at a 2.56% spread to the 5-year Canadian bond, with the next reset occurring in September 2020. Item # 1.A. Bought 50 FFHPRG at C$14.54 (11/13/19 Post)  


My brokerage commissions on all Canadian Reset preferred transactions are C$1 for 100 shares or less.  


Trading Profits Canadian Reset Preferred Stocks = +C$10,643.5 


Realized Trading Profits FFH Preferred Stocks = C$680.5


FFHPRD = C$400 (2017)

FFHPRG = C$168.5  (2017) & C$112 (2016)

Snapshots are included in Advantages and Disadvantages of Equity Preferred Floating Rate Securities


The Canadian Reset equity preferred stocks in the aggregate have been moving up in price recently. This class of securities will generally perform better when interest rates are moving up, as investors start to anticipate higher coupons on the applicable reset date.


A steep decline in prices occurred when it became obvious that interest rates were headed back down.


The most recent top in the 5 year Canadian bond's yield was at 2.5% during September 2018.


Importantly for the pricing of the Canadian equity preferred resets, the forecast then was that rates would continue to move higher. That turned out to be the wrong forecast as the 5 year Canadian bond yield fell to about 1.2% last August.


Worries about a recession led many to believe that the downtrend in rates would continue. That forecast and the actual decline from 2.5% to 1.2% in less than a year caused a major decline in prices for this class of securities.


More optimism about future growth has resulted in the 5 year moving back up in yield, closing near 1.7% last Friday.


2. Pares and Eliminations

A. Sold 131+ PNNT at $6.6



Profit Snapshot: +$20.17 (net) 


Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 2.A. Added 10 PNNT at $6.09 (10/26/19 Post)Item # 2.B. Added 50 PNNT at $6.21 (9/21/19 Post)

Last Sell DiscussionsItem # 1.B. Sold 50 PNNT at $7.35-Highest Cost Lot (6/7/18 Post)Sold Roth IRA: 100 PNNT at $9.535 (2/17/15 Post)Item # 5 Sold 50 PNNT at $11.92 (12/17/13 Post)


Dividend: Quarterly at $.18. While the dividend has not been covered by net investment income per share in recent quarters, this BDC does have spillover income that has covered the shortfall.  (see my discussion in this comment)


Goal: With BDCs, the goal is to exit the position at a total return in excess of the dividend payments. 


Small Ball Trading Rules


B. Sold 105 AKBA at $6.35



Profit Snapshot: $135.66 (net)


C. Pared JCAP-Sold 50 at $20 (highest cost lot)


Quote: Jernigan Capital Inc. (JCAP)

Website: Jernigan Capital


SEC Filings


Average Cost Before Pare = $18.95



Average Cost After Pare = $18.44


Snapshot Intra-day 12/19/19 
Profit Snapshot: +$8.47 



Item # 3. Bought 50 JCAP at 19.83 (7/27/19 Post)


Last Buy DiscussionItem # 1.A. Bought 10 JCAP at $18.9 and 30 at $18.78 (10/19/19 Post) I did continue to purchase lots at lower prices, including the following: 5 at $18.72, 5 at $18.18, 5 at $17.8; 10 at $17.46, 4 at $17.41 and 5 at $17.3, just a typical small ball trading pattern using commission-free trades. 


Jernigan Capital, Inc. Announces Agreement to Internalize External Manager The stock popped on this news, even though the quarterly dividend was cut from $.35 per share to $.23 or $.92 annually. The overall cost of the internalization is favorable to shareholders IMO.


At the new dividend rate, the yield at a total cost of $18.44 is 4.99%.


I will receive one quarterly dividend at the old rate of $.35 which went ex on 12/31/19. 


D. Pared PPL-Sold 50 at $36.2




Quote: PPL Corp.

PPL Corp. Analyst Estimates 

Profit Snapshot: +$114.96




Item # 1 Bought 100 PPL at $33.9  (12/7/19 Post) I discussed the last earnings report in that post. 

Dividend: Quarterly at $.41 per share


Last Ex Dividend: 12/9/19 (received on the 100 shares)


PPL 5 Year Chart


3. An Example of an Early Redemption


Laboratory Corporation  of America Holdings (LH) redeemed its 2.625% SU bond maturing on 1/1/2020 on 12/31/20. The issuer made a $1.56 per bond make whole payment. The issuer did not have the right, which is common, to avoid a make whole payment when the optional redemption right was exercised 30 days before maturity. 



Prospectus Excerpt 
LH bonds are frequently available in 1 bond lots. I owned this particular bond in 3 accounts. 

Their purchases were made as part of an anticipated low return/low risk investment strategy where the goal was to realize a total return in excess of a treasury with maturities similar to the remaining terms of these bonds when bought. 


The comparable treasury would have been somewhat shorter than the two year treasury note which was treading in a range between 2% and 2.25% when these bonds were bought. 2018 Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates 


The goal for such a short maturity would be close to .5% annual return in excess of that treasury note when I view the interest rate and credit risk issue to be immaterial. 


That excess total return is negligible for a few bonds, of course, but adds up in a 7 figure bond portfolio.    


Profit on 6 Bonds = $16.87 





  
By going out further in time, I was able to trade LH SU bonds where the total return was significantly higher than for the 6 bonds maturing on 2/1/20. In each case, a 1 bond round-trip produced a greater profit than the 6 short term bonds.  

E.G. 2019 Sells:  


Item # 2.A. Sold 1 LH 3.6% SU Maturing on 2/1/25 at 103.340 (7/37/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $45.54)-Item # 1.B. Bought 1 LH 2025 SU at a TC of 98.088 (3/22/17 Post)


Item # 3.A. Sold 1 LH 3.25% SU Maturing on 9/1/24 at 100.131 (6/8/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $28.04)-Item # 4.A. Bought 1 LH SU at a TC of 97.277 (3/15/18 Post) 


I was not concerned about the credit risk for the issuer over the intermediate term 3 to 10 years, so that risk IMO was no different than the LH short term bonds.  


The longer maturities can of course  increase interest rate risk, but observation assumes some future event that may never happen. The reality of interest rate risk depends on whether rates go up or down. 


There is interest rate risk in owning bonds, T Bills and CDs that have short term maturities when short rates are declining which is the recent experience.   


When I bought the 6 LH bonds that were just redeemed, the reasonable forecast was that they had less interest rate risk attached to them than the LH intermediate term bonds. 


However, if I took a snapshot of the risks at this moment in time, the shorter term bonds arguably had greater interest rate risk since I will receive less income reinvesting the proceeds into a similar bond while I could have received a greater return with the intermediate term bonds.  


This assessment of risk is fluid with time. 


Interest rates for intermediate term bonds have been moving up some but not enough to change the conclusion set out in the previous paragraph.  



DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members. 

8 comments:

  1. Today was a robust start for 2020 as the Stock Jocks were jumping at the opportunity to take the SPX over 3,250.

    S&P 500 Index 3,257.85 +27.07 +0.84%

    There were some anomalies.

    Interest rates declined some, but the equity REIT went down as reflected in VNQ losing 1.17%.

    iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
    $110.73 +$0.51 +0.46%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/ief

    Vanguard Real Estate ETF
    $91.70 -$1.09 -1.17%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/vnq

    VNQ did have a good year in 2018, posting a total return of 28.91%, but that was after an overall anemic total return for the 2014-2018 period.

    2015: +2.42%
    2016: +8.6%
    2017 +4.91%
    2018 -5.95%

    The utility sector also was down today.

    Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
    $63.81 -$0.81 -1.25%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlu

    Consumer staple stocks were down as well:
    $62.48 -$0.50 -0.79%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlp

    The up move today largely powered by technology and consumer discretionary stocks to a lesser extent.

    Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
    $93.39 +$1.72 +1.88%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlk

    E.G. Apple $300.35 +$6.70 2.28%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/aapl

    Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY)
    $126.91 +$1.49 +1.19%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xly

    The financial (XLF) and energy (XLE) sectors were up in line with the SPX's advance.

    Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
    $31.08 +0.30 +0.97%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xlf

    Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
    $60.58 0.54 0.90%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/xle

    The underlying theme was to buy economically sensitive sectors and to sell defensive ones.

    With the continue surge higher, I will probably stick with my plan to harvest this month my annual capital gains minimum goal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The markets will be reacting today to the U.S. drone strike that killed Major General Qassim Suleimani, the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, and several officials from Iraqi militias backed by Iran.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/top-iranian-general-qassim-suleimani-is-killed-on-trump-s-orders-officials-say/ar-BBYz0Zs?li=BBnbfcL

    Iran will have to retaliate. Since the attack occurred on Iraq's soil and was unauthorized by that country, relations with Iraq will worsen.

    Bush's Iraq invasion destabilized the region; brought Iran and Iraq closer together as potential U.S. enemies; will end up costing over $2 trillion dollars (all borrowed); and resulted in over 100K deaths and countless more severe injuries.

    In pre-market trading, there is a flight to safety with the major stock sector beneficiary being energy.

    WTI futures are currently up $2.17 as of 8:37 a.m. EST:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/future/crude%20oil%20-%20electronic?mod=home-page

    ReplyDelete
  3. The integrated energy companies with large refining operations did not participate in the energy stock sector rally today. Both CVX and XOM declined in price. E & P companies without refining operations did post decent gains.

    The fast rise in crude oil prices can reduce refining margins.

    The refiner Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) declined by 3.79%:
    $91.52 -$3.61 (-3.79%)
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VLO/?p=VLO

    The much hated Occidental Petroleum has been rising with crude oil prices.

    Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY)
    $43.61 +$1.03 (+2.42%)
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OXY?p=OXY

    OXY closed at $37.71 on 12/13/19.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was going to ask what you think might be the next down thing. But that's been answered.

    The amount down wasn't very much. Not even as much as the rise the day before. So the market didn't find this much of a risk.

    In the middle east show of strength is the best way to peace or stability. It's opposite western thinking and results. Based on that, this in spite of Trump's chaos method, I suspect will be not much of anything in the long run. Iran's got financial trouble, so they can't start a war with USA. They would have hit the other targets anyway. They were escalating. It's too late for the diplomatic path. But I even non-western regional experts located there are saying what I am, and media listens to them, and still doesn't consider it a possibility. I hope I'm right. Because if not, this is major risky to the region.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: I would agree with you that the Stock Jocks viewed the killing of Major General Suleimani as a non-event.

      A military escalation is not likely unless one or the other side miscalculates.

      There are reasons to be concerned that a miscalculation will happen when Donald responds to whatever Iran does in its response.

      The Duck threatened to attack 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated against the U.S.

      https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-threatens-iran-attacks-52-sites-n1110511

      If Iran has some "proportional response" and Donald responds in that way, then there will be a war fought on many continents with conventional and unconventional forces.

      My response was to nibble last Friday on two energy stock ETFs as I discussed in a post published a few minutes ago.

      Those immaterial adds reflect my current opinion that nothing major will occur, though there may be yet another triggering event down the road.

      There have been plenty of examples over the past year (e.g. missile attacks on shipping and Saudi oil infrastructure, attacks on U.S. embassy, continued Iranian support for terrorist groups, etc).

      The possibility that this latest event could morph into something much worse, with far reaching implications, is real however.

      The Fear and Greed Index hit 97 on Thursday and fell back to 93 last Friday. The market is vulnerable to a pullback without any extraneous event triggering it.

      Optimism about the near and intermediate term future for the U.S. economy and corporate profits is excessive IMO.

      The Stock Jocks have forgotten that there have been two 50% declines within the past two decades.

      And, they are not thinking long term about how a recovery can be sustained with $1 trillion per year in federal government budget deficits.

      This raises the issue of whether the worldwide assumption of close to $70 trillion in new debt since the last Near Depression in 2008 was the appropriate cure for a severe recession ultimately triggered by too much debt. The consensus opinion will ultimately develop that this was madness.

      Delete
    2. I would have supported the debt more if it'd been spent on infrastructure or health care. It's spending on random stuff during Obama, and well, I"m not sure under Trump, leaves us still needing to spend on those those two.

      I suspect the 52 was a military suggestion. I thought it a good move to signal to keep the retaliation down. No one was going to actually hit those sites or people. But Iran can't be sure, now that Trump hit their key man.

      I was feeling find about it all, but now Trump doesn't know when to shut up. He's threatening Iraq now with sanctions... after Iraq voted for a non-binding removal of USA troops. I.e. Trump was winning but he doesn't know it so now he's still bullying.

      Futures aren't down much. Could even be a nice up day tomorrow. That greed index is hanging in there.

      Delete
  5. "Fear & Greed Index-CNNMoney (currently at 93 on a zero to 100 scale, indicating "extreme greed")"

    With that in place, the events should have been the triggering reason for a big pullback. Hasn't happened yet. Guess it could next week. Seems like it should started on the day of the triggering event.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2020/01/feny-ivz-nrbay-orkly-xegca.html

    ReplyDelete