Economy:
Retail sales producer price index May 2021 jumps 6.6% from May 2020
Homebuilder sentiment drops to 10-month low as building costs boost prices
The FED acknowledged the existence of inflation last Thursday and the Stock Jocks had a mini freak out.
In the FED members "Dot Plot", 10 out of the 18 members opined that the federal funds rate will be at least .625% in 2023, up from near zero now. The Fed - June 16, 2021: FOMC Projections materials (Figure 2)
A .625% FF rate is a completely meaningless gesture in fighting inflation and will have no discernible impact on the real economy.
The FED's current 2021 PCE inflation prediction is higher than its previous forecast but the members continue to see this year as a mere blip in a long-term subdued inflation trend.
The FED uses PCE rather than CPI.Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
The PCE inflation number is published as part of the government's monthly Personal Income and Outlays report. The last report was for April 2021. Personal Income and Outlays, April 2021 | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA):
Annual PCE at 3.6%/Core at 3.1% |
The report for May will be released in late June.
I read several articles that characterized the FED as turning "hawkish", a bizarre and absurd characterization (e.g. A Hawkish Fed Created a Lot of Losers. Here’s the Big Winner. | Barron's and Shaken but not stirred: bond markets may weather hawkish Fed for now | Reuters)
The ten-year treasury yield finished the week at 1.45% down from 1.57% last Wednesday. Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates
Taking interest rates down in response to a hot inflation report is not explainable in any rationale manner other than to simply accept that inflation is not a factor in setting interest rates, a conclusion that is buttressed by the historic anomaly that investors knowingly buy U.S. treasuries expecting a significant negative real yield before any tax bite. Take it or leave it. The market is not setting interest rates. Interest rates throughout the maturity spectrum are being set by the Federal Reserve (and other major CBs) without regard to inflation, inflationary pressures, and anticipated inflation expressed in the breakeven inflation rates for the TIPs. And those CBs are willing to allow inflation to run its course without taking any action that will impact that course. Hopefully, the FED will be proven correct that inflation will return to 2% in 2022 without the FED taking any meaningful action to tamp it down.
+++
Markets and Market Commentary:
Close on 5/18/21: VIX 20.70 +2.95 +16.62% The VIX had simmered down and closed at 15.65 on 6/11/21. CBOE Volatility Index Historical Spiking back above 20 after a brief period of below 20 movements is a characteristic of the Unstable VIX Pattern. This upward whipsaw movement will be accompanied by a meaningful decline in the S & P 500 index. This last happened in May:
For as long as the whipsaw action consisting of temporary movements below 20 and spikes back over 20 continue, there is an enhanced danger that something worse may happen that causes a more serious stock market correction and a VIX spike into the 30s or higher.
Regional bank and other financial stocks were hammered after the FED announcement. The SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) closed at $69.37 last Wednesday and at $63.66, down 8.23% in 2 trading days.
'Big Short' investor Michael Burry is back on Twitter - and warning of the biggest market bubble in history | Markets Insider
'Shocking' inflation will end, hurt reopening stocks: David Rosenberg
Paul Tudor Jones: 'Go all in' on inflation trades if Fed ignores higher prices For Jones, that includes buying commodities and gold. REITs who largely have rent increases indexed to CPI can benefit provided rates for debt refinancings remained suppressed.
Jamie Dimon: JPMorgan is hoarding cash because 'very good chance' inflation here to stay
Commodities from copper to corn tumble on China crackdown, a rising dollar (6/17/21); Cramer: Market is signaling commodity inflation is 'pretty much over
Why China Can’t Stop the Rally in Copper | Barron's (6/17/21)(green energy is a heavy copper user)
Kroger (KR) Delivers Strong First Quarter Results and Raises Full-Year 2021 Guidance
New Covid study hints at the long-term loss of brain tissue, Dr. Scott Gottlieb warns
++++
Essex Redeems Early 10 SU Bonds -Subject to Make Whole:
Essex redeemed early its 3.375% senior unsecured bond maturing on 1/15/23. The bond was clearly subject to a make-whole payment attached to an issuer optional redemption:
Nonetheless, Schwab only credited my account on the 16th with the $10K principal amount and the accrued and unpaid interest:
I knew that was wrong so I sent them this email:
Late last night, my account was credited with the correct amount of $10,465.65, which includes a $465.65 make-whole payment in addition to the $10K principal amount + the interest.
I seriously doubt that Essex failed to pay the make-whole penalty required by the prospectus. Most likely, Schwab failed to credit my account, though it is not 100% clear whether it was an internal failure or a failure by an intermediary to pass along the correct amount which I doubt was the cause.
Buy Discussion: Item # 3.A. Bought 10 Essex Portfolio 3.375% SU Bonds Maturing on 1/15/23 at a Total Cost of 97.114-TC includes $10 commission (6/6/20 Post) When I bought these bonds, I classified them as part of a short term bond strategy which simply means that interest rate risk was not a material concern.
Profit Snapshot: $634.46 (73.39% of the profit from the make-whole payment)
Issuer: Operating company for Essex Property Trust Inc. (ESS) (all of the bonds issued by the operating entity are guaranteed by ESS)
I still own 2 other Essex Portfolio bonds: Item # 1.B. Bought 2 Essex Property L.P. 3.25% SU Maturing on 5/1/23 at a TC of 99.628 (4/20/17 Post) I am expecting an early redemption for those bonds that will be subject to a make-whole payment.
Essex redeemed last year my two 3.625% SU bonds that would have matured on 8/15/22.
Profit = $90.32 includes $119.20 Make Whole Payment More than Offsetting Premium Purchase Price |
I rarely pay a premium to par value price for corporate bonds.
+++
Tucker Carlson Bizarrely Blames the FBI for MAGA Riot | Vanity Fair; Tucker Carlson's baseless conspiracy theory that FBI 'organized' Jan. 6 - The Washington Post Tucker Carlson is one of the main anchors for the real Fake News network, hosting an hour-long program on Fox "news" during prime time.
Trump pressed DOJ to fight election results, emails show: House panel; Trump Pressed Official to Wield Justice Dept. to Back Election Claims; republished by MSN.com from Trump Pressed Rosen to Wield Justice Dept. to Back 2020 Election Claims - The New York Times; New emails detail Trump’s efforts to have Justice Department take up his false election-fraud claims - The Washington Post That is out, of course, part of the authoritarian's playbook.
One of the emails sent to the AG attached a video claiming that Italians used satellites to manipulate voting equipment to Don the Authoritarian's detriment. 'Pure insanity': Emails detail Trump's pressure on Justice Department to overturn the election Facts and truth do not matter in Trump's America. Fox News caught trying to pass off GOP operatives as parents "concerned" about critical race theory; Fox’s anti-“critical race theory” parents are also GOP activists | Media Matters for America
The brazenly bogus and partisan "audit" of the Maricopa County election results, initiated by the Arizona republicans to challenge the November 2020 election results for no purpose other than to cast doubt on the democratic process, is nearing a conclusion. It is unfortunate that anyone will place any credence on the outcome irrespective of the findings. The Republicans in Arizona have already passed a voter suppression law that will assist them in taking back the two Senate seats and winning the state in the next presidential election. Arizona’s Voter Suppression Bills Are Dangerously Close to Becoming Law | Brennan Center for Justice; Arizona G.O.P. Passes Law to Limit Distribution of Mail Ballots - The New York Times
New questions about key Trump impeachment witness - The Washington Post It looks like Kurt Volker knew there was a quid pro quo but claimed otherwise in his testimony. Rudy Giuliani: New audio of 2019 phone call reveals how he pressured Ukraine to investigate debunked Biden conspiracies; A New Giuliani Tape Shows a Key Witness Didn’t Testify Accurately in the First Trump Impeachment
Arizona voting data taken to so-called 'lab' in remote Montana
Trump Justice Department took records from Apple secretly on White House Counsel Don McGahn
The United States for most of its history has not been a universal democracy where all adult citizens had the right to vote. It took a Constitutional Amendment to provide universal suffrage for women (ratified on 8/18/19) and blacks were largely excluded from voting until the later part of the 20th century.
Casting ballots in secret is of recent origin, which nullified the ability of political machines to punish those who voted the wrong way.
The U.S. was unique in the 18th Century in the number of individuals who were allowed to vote for their representatives. The U.S. was not then anywhere close to a full-fledged representative democracy.
The primary anti-democracy party in the U.S. has changed over time.
After the passage of the 13th and 14th Amendments, and prior to the 1960s, the Democrats were the primary anti-democracy party, particularly in the South, implemented through Jim Crow laws and intimidation practices, but now Trump's party is the one that leans heavily toward authoritarianism. Trump can only be characterized as a demagogic autocrat. And, it has now been proven that no Republican politician will be willing or successful in resisting that strong authoritarian, anti-democratic trend. There was a political party trying to steal the 2020 presidential election and it was not the Democrats.
In world history, democracies are an aberration. The dominant trend has been centralized and autocratic rule. And I would view the continued existence of a democracy to be fragile given the willingness of humans to endorse or tolerate autocratic rulers.
The United States surpasses 600,000 deaths from covid - The Washington Post; Trump Has Often Downplayed The Coronavirus. Here's A Sampling
The 30 most bizarre lines from Donald Trump's interview with Sean Hannity
Affordable Care Act survives third Supreme Court challenge, as the case from Trump administration and GOP-led states are rejected - The Washington Post The Republican effort to repeal Obamacare through judicial fiat was rejected based on the plaintiff's lack of standing to challenge the law rather than on the merits.
++
1. Canadian Reset Equity Preferred Stocks:
I have eliminated several of these securities based on a likely continuation of low coupons, either from spreads to the 3-month Canadian treasury bill or likely low coupons resets to the 5-year Canadian government bond.
A. Eliminated BAMPRS:CA-Sold 50 at C$20.22 (C$1 IB Commission):
Quote: BAM-PS.TO
Issuer: Brookfield Asset Management Inc. Cl A
Profit Snapshot: +C$281.5
Buy Discussion: Item # 1.A. Bought 50 BAMPRS:CA at C$14.55 (9/9/19 Post)
Par Value: C$25
Coupon: 2.35% spread to the 3-month Canadian treasury.
Canada 3 Month Government Bond Overview | MarketWatch
When I bought this security in 2019, I was not expecting the 3-month Canadian treasury bill to collapse in yield and the discount to par value at C$14.55 at least sparked some interest. I am not interested now with the 3-month yield near .11% and the price over C$20.
I am deemphasizing floaters that pay a spread to short-term rates and have been selling them in response to price rallies.
B. Eliminated BAMPRT:CA-Sold 50 at C$20.51 (C$1 IB commission):
Quote: BAM-PT.TO
Issuer: Brookfield Asset Management Inc. Cl A
Profit Snapshot: +C$273
Par Value = $25
Coupon: 2.31% spread to the 5-year Canadian government bond
Next Reset: 4/1/22
Dividends: Cumulative and Quarterly
Canada 5 Year Government Bond Overview
Last Reset and Current Coupon: 4/1/17 at 3.471%
This one is looking like it will reset in April 2022 near the current coupon. The profit is worth more to me than receiving a similar coupon through April 2027. If the coupon resets at close to 3.4%, and interest rates start to persistently rise shortly thereafter, the price will fall. A possible repurchase may occur when the price sinks back below C$15 with 2-3 years until the next reset.
2. Small Ball:
A. Pared JRI-Sold Highest Cost 30 shares at $15.9:
Quote: JRI - Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
"The Fund seeks to deliver a high level of current income and long-term capital appreciation by investing in real asset-related companies across the world and the capital structure, including common stocks, preferred securities, and debt. Real asset-related companies include those engaged in owning, operating, or developing infrastructure projects, facilities, and services, as well as REITs." Sponsor's Website: JRI - Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
Leveraged: Yes at 27.77% as of 5/31/21
Last Buy Discussions: Item # 1.G. Added to JRI-Bought 10 at $11.8; 10 at $11.66 (8/1/20 Post); Item # 1.C. Added 5 JRI at $8.95; 10 at $8.09; 10 at $10.16; 10 at $10.66 (5/16/20 Post)
SEC FilingPortfolio as of 3/31/21 (as of, the total cost was at $588.6+M with the total value at $608.9+M)
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (2020 SEC Filed Annual Report)
Profit Snapshot: +$14.73
The shares were purchased in 3 ten share lots with an original total average cost per share of $15.59.
New Average cost per share this account: $11.17 (141+ shares):
Snapshot Intraday 5/27/21 after pare |
The average cost per share was $11.91.
Dividend: Monthly at $.0965 per share ($1.11 annually), with some ROC support.
The monthly dividend was cut from $.117 to the current rate effective for the April 2020 payment.
Yield at new AC = 9.94% (assuming no dividend cut)
Last Ex-Dividend: 6/14/21
Data Date of 5/27/21 Trade:
Closing Net Asset Value per share: $17.06
Closing Market Price: $15.94
Discount: -6.57%
Average 5 Year Discount = -11.63
Sourced: JRI- CEF Connect
Prior Sell Discussions: Item # 1.K Eliminated JRI in Schwab Taxable Account-Sold 100 at $11.48 (6/6/20 Post)(profit snapshot = $69.35); Item # 2.A. Sold 102+ JRI at $17.98 (12/22/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $140.67); Item # 1.A. Sold 100 JRI at $17.51(10/30/19 Post )(profit snapshot = $100.41); Item # 4 Sold 100 JRI at $17.23 (10/2/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $40.45)
JRI Realized Gains to Date: $365.61 ($350.88 in prior trades)
B. Started CVX-Bought 1 at $102.75:
Quote: Chevron Corp. (CVX)
Closing Price 6/18/21: CVX $103.03 -$4.04 -3.77%
CVXAnalyst Estimates | MarketWatch
Key Financial Results (2018-2020): Extremely erratic and consequently hard to value.
Dividend: Quarterly at $1.34 ($5.36 annually), last raised from $1.29 effective for the 2021 second quarter payment.
Prior Dividend History:
Yield at $102.75 = 5.22%My last round-trip was a 30 share lot sold in 2017 that was part of a dividend harvest strategy approach:
Profit $113.26 |
Prior to that round-trip, I have to go back to a 40 share lot sold in 2007:
Profit $100.35 |
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/31/21):
Adjusted net profit = $1.73B or $.90 per share.
Results were negatively impacted by the winter storm URI and the pandemic.
Revenues rose 2% to $32.029B
Brokerage Reports (available to Schwab customers):
Credit Suisse (5/2/21): Outperform with a $126 PT.
Morningstar (5/26/21): 3 stars with a fair value ("FV") of $115, rated as a narrow moat.
Argus (5/12/21): Buy and raised PT to $127 from $108, raised 2021 E.P.S. estimate to $5.29 from $3.57, and increased 2022 E.P.S. estimate to $6.15 from $5.45.
S & P (4/30/21): 3 stars with a 12 month PT of $109 (an 8.3x multiple to 2021 projected cash flow; notes that free cash flow covered the dividend and cash Capex.)
Purchase Restriction: Average down only in small lots, with each subsequent purchase having to be at the lowest price in the chain.
C. Pared BXMX-Sold 10 at $14.14:
Quote: Nuveen S&P 500 Buy-Write Income Fund Overview- A CEF
Sponsor's Website: Nuveen S&P 500 Buy-Write Income Fund
Nuveen S&P 500 Buy-Write Income Fund 2020 Annual Report
Buy Discussions: Item L. Added to BXMX-Bought 10 at $10.96 (11/13/20 Post); Item # 2 Bought 100 BXMX at $11 (6/27/20 Post)
Profit Snapshot: +$33.66 (5/27/21 sale only)
New AC per share this account: $10.44 (100 shares
Snapshot Intraday on 5/27/21 after pare |
Dividend: Quarterly at $.215 per share ($.86 annually)
Significant ROC support.
Yield at AC = 8.24%
Last Ex-Dividend: 6/14/21
Data Date of 5/27/21 Trade:
Closing Net Asset Value Per Share: $14.74
Closing market price: $14.12
Discount = -4.21%
Sourced: BXMX- CEF Connect
Last Sell Discussion Item # 2.J. Sold All Shares Purchased with dividend in Fidelity Taxable at $13.63 (4/24/21 Post)(profit = $13.63)
D. Eliminated STK-Sold 10+ at $34.57:
Quote: Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund Inc. Overview-A CEF
Last SEC Filed Shareholder Report (period ending 12/31/20)
SEC Filing: Holdings as of 3/31/21 (Cost at $233.3+M; Value at $494.2+M)
Sponsor's Website: Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
Top 10 Holdings as of 4/30/21:
Profit Snapshot = +$132.15
Last Discussed: Item # 1.K. Bought 5 STK at $22.58; 5 at $21.53 (9/12/20 Post)
Data Date of 5/27/21 Trade:
Closing Net Asset Value: $32.05
Closing Market Price: $34.57
Premium to Net Asset Valuer per share: +7.86%
I see no good reason to hold this fund when it is selling at such a significant premium to net asset value per share.
5 Year Average Premium: +2.57%
Sourced: STK-CEF Connect
STK Total Returns As of 5/28/21:
YTD: +29.54%
5 Years Annual Average: +24.42%
10 Years Annual Average: +17.88%
Sourced: Columbia Seligman Premium Tech Growth (STK) Total Returns | Morningstar
Compare with -
XLK Total Returns as of 5/28/21: Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK) Performance-Morningstar
YTD: +6.67%
5 Year Annual Average: +27.74%
10 Year Annual Average: +19.9%
I still own XLK.
STK makes more sense to me when it is selling at a discount to net asset value per share or at no more than a 1% premium.
E. Pared ISBC-Sold All Fractional Shares Bought with Dividends at $14.64:
Quote: Investors Bancorp Inc. (ISBC)
Closing Price 6/18/21: ISBC $13.82 -$0.59 -4.09%
ISBC Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch
Investors Relations | Investors Bank
Buy Discussions: Item # 1.G. Bought 5 ISBC at $7.21; 5 at $7.09; 5 at $6.9(10/24/20 Post); Item # 1.D. Started ISBC-Bought 10 at $7.97; 4 at $7.7 (9/5/20 Post)
Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy
Profit: +$2.31
New AC after pare = $7.48 (30 shares)
Snapshot Intraday on 5/27/21 after pare |
Dividend: Quarterly at $.14 per share ($.56 annually)
Dividend Yield: 7.49%
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/31/21): Investors Bancorp, Inc. Announces First Quarter Financial Results and Cash Dividend
E.P.S. = $.31
Net Income = $72.3M
NIM: 2.9%, down 8 basis points from the prior quarter
Efficiency Ratio: 51.99%
ROA: 1.11%
NPL Ratio: .4% down from .51% in the prior quarter
Coverage Ratio: 340.6%
Tangible Book Value Per Share: $11.23, up from $10.97 in the prior quarter
My $7.48 AC per share is at a -33.39% discount to that $11.23 tangible book value per share.
ROE: 11%
F. Eliminated VSTM-Sold 100 at $3.97:
Quote: Verastem Inc.
VSTM Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch
Profit Snapshot: +$8.22
Investment Category: Lottery Ticket Basket
Last Discussed: Item # 1.A. Bought 50 VSTM at $4.73 (5/28/18 Post) I later averaged down with another 50 share lot purchase that allowed me to escape profitably.
The shares popped in response to this press release. Verastem Oncology Receives Breakthrough Therapy Designation for VS-6766 with Defactinib in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer While receiving a breakthrough therapy designation from the FDC is better than not having one, it does not mean the drug will ultimately succeed and be approved by the FDA. My inclination is to reset my cost basis at a lower number down the road.
Other News:
Verastem Oncology Signs Definitive Agreement to Sell COPIKTRA® (duvelisib) Rights to Secura Bio to Focus on Development of VS-6766 and Defactinib in KRAS Mutant Solid Tumors (8/10/20) ($70M upfront payment + double-digit sales royalties + milestone payments; this transaction has closed)
G. Pared SCM in Vanguard Taxable-Sold 10 at $13.2:
Quote: Stellus Capital Investment Corp. (SCM)- A BDC
Closing Price 6/18/21: SCM $12.63 -$0.42 -3.22%
Website: Stellus Capital
2020 Annual Report (risk factor summary starts on page 33 and ends on page 70)
Lots prior to the pare:
I sold the 10 share lot bought on 3/6/20.
Profit Snapshot: +$11.33
Last Discussed: Item # 1.C. Pared SCM in Fidelity Taxable -Sold 13 at $12.46 and 13+ at $13.25 (4/17/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $69.04)
Last Substantive Buy Discussions: Item # 1.E. Bought 5 SCM at $7.41 in Fidelity Account (8/15/20 Post); Item # 3.J. Added 10 SCM at $7.85; 5 at $7.65; 10 at $7.5 (7/18/20 Post); Item # 2.B. Added 10 SCM at $7.8; 2 at $6.26, 3 at $5.30; 5 at $7.53 (5/9/20 Post)
SCM Net asset value per share history:
3/31/21: $14.03 10-Q for the Q/E 3/31/21 at page 3
12/31/20: $14.03 10-K at page 74
12/31/19: $14.14
12/31/18: $14.09
12/31/17: $13.81
12/31/16 $13.69
12/31/15: $13.19
12/31/14: $13.94
12/31/13: $14.54
November 2012: IPO at $15 ($14.46 after underwriters discount)
Net Asset Value per share before Pare in this account: $8.52
Net Asset Value per share after Pare this account: $7.365
Dividend: Monthly at $.0833 per share (rounded $1 per share annually)
Stellus Capital Investment Corporation Announces Second Quarter 2021 Monthly Dividends
I have turned off dividend reinvestment.
Yield at New AC per share of $7.365 = 13.58%
5 Year Chart: Crashed and Burned March 2020
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/3121): Stellus Capital Investment Corporation Reports Results for its Fiscal First Quarter Ended March 31, 2021
NII per share = $.26
Core NII per share = $.28
Sell Discussions: Item # 1.F. Pared SCM in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 20 at $11.08 and Item #1.G. Pared SCM in Vanguard Taxable-Sold 20 at $11.17 (12/19/20 Post)(profit snapshots = $14.23); Item # 3 Sold 50 SCM at $13.72 (9/21/19 Post)(eliminating position as of that date; profit snapshot = $3.75); Item # 1.I. Sold 20 SCM at $7.61 (8/22/20 Post)(contains snapshots of prior trades; profit snapshot = $10.84); Item # 1.B. Sold 32+ SCM at $14.22-Used Commission Free Trade (2/2/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $78.09); Item # 1.A. Sold Highest Cost Lot-50 Shares at $12.63 (5/3/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $34.24); Item 2.B. Sold 100 SCM at $14.23 (2/27/17 Post)(profit snapshot=$285.96); Item # 2 Sold 100 SCM at $13.02 (1/12/17 Post)(profit snapshot= $141.96)
SCM Realized Gains to Date: $649.44 (prior sales = $638.11)
Goal: Any total return in excess of the dividend payments.
H. Bought 3 KBWY at $22.88-Vanguard Taxable:
Quote: Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF Overview
Closing Price 6/18/21: KBWY $22.78 -$0.69 -2.94%
Sponsor's Website: Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF
Expense Ratio: .35%
Some Top Holdings as of 6/11/21:
I own 10 of the stocks listed in the previous snapshot and 2 others that are owned by this fund (BRG and STAG).
Current Position this account: 42+ shares
Average Cost per share: $23
Dividend: Monthly at a variable rate
I. Started KBWY in Fidelity Account-Bought 5 at $22.87:
See Item # 1.H. above.
J. Started CNQ in Vanguard Taxable-Bought 5 at $32.9:
Quotes:
USD: Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
CAD: Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (Canada: Toronto)
Website: Canadian Natural Resources
CNQ SEC Filings (foreign company)
Dividend: Quarterly at C$.47 (C$1.88 per share); last raised from C$.425 effective for the 2021 second quarter payment.
2017 CNQ 50 Shares +$66.02 |
Quote: Iron Mountain Inc (IRM)
Website: Iron Mountain Inc (IRM)
Investment Category: Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy
Last Buy Discussions: Item # 2.E. Started IRM in Schwab Taxable Account-Bought 10 at $26.8; 5 at $25.8; 5 at $25.25; 5 at $24.9 (12/5/20 Post); Item # 1.B. Added 3 IRM at $22.99; 2 at $22.31 (6/20/20 Post); Item # 2.F. Added to IRM in Fidelity Taxable-Bought 1 at $26.88; 2 at $26.2; 1 at $25.7; 1 at $25.52; 1 at $24.96 (12/5/20 Post)(substantive discussion); Item # 2.A. Added 1 IRM at $26.46; 1 at $26.07; 1 at $25; 2 at $23.95; 1 at $23.3; 1 at $23.76; 1 at $24.33; 1 at $22.61; 1 at $24.33; 1 at $22.6 and 1 at $21.79 (5/2/20 Post)
Profit Snapshot: $77.94 (6/1/21 sale only)
New Average Cost Per Share this account: $24.01 (20 shares)
Dividend: Quarterly at $.6185 per share ($2.474 annually)
Iron Mountain - Stock - Dividend History and Tax Treatment
Dividend reinvestment has been turned off.
Yield at $24.01 AC = 10.3%
Last Ex-Dividend: 6/14/21
5 Year Chart:
Last Earnings Report (Q/E 3/31/21):
Sell Discussions: Item # 1.K. Sold 5 IRM at $37.69 (4/30/21 Post); Item #1.B. Sold 2 IRM at $35.63; 5 at $36.8 (2/27/21 Post); Item # 1.L. Sold 5 IRM in Schwab Account at $36.42 and Item #1.M. Sold 2.731 in Fidelity Account at $36.86 (4/1/21 Post); Item #1.B. Sold 2 IRM at $35.63; 5 at $36.8 in Fidelity Taxable (2/27/21 Post); Item # 1.B. Pared IRM-Sold 15 at $33.04 (2/22/20 Post); Item # 1.C. Sold 10 IRM at $33.91-Used Commission Free Trade (12/26/18 Post); Item # 3 Sold 50 IRM at $33.82 Update For Equity REIT Basket Strategy As Of 4/6/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha
The goal in all accounts for this stock is a total return in excess of the dividend payments before the ROC adjustments to the tax cost basis.
Broker Reports (available to Schwab customers):
Credit Suisse (5/6/21): Underperform with an $18 price target. This analyst looks stupid when focusing just on the current IRM price. That does not prove that his analysis is wrong long term.
S & P (5/21/21): 4 stars with a 12 month PT of $40. The price was at $43 when the analyst assigned a 4-star rating.
See Item # 2.K. above.
Profit Snapshot: +$24.34
Remaining Shares in this account: 3
Average Cost per share: $21.75
Snapshot 6/9 Close after pare |
Yield at $21.75 AC = 11.37%
M. Pared IRM in Schwab Taxable-Sold 1 at $46.93:
See Item # 2.K. above
Profit: +$20.13
New AC this account: $25.7 (19+ shares)
Yield at new AC = 9.63%
IRM Realized Gains to Date: $801.41 ($679 in prior trades)
N. Pared FIDI-Sold All Fractional Shares purchased with dividends:
Quote: Fidelity International High Dividend ETF Overview
Buy Discussions: Item # 1.I. Started FIDI-Bought 10 at $16.56; 5 at $16.11; 5 at $15.91 (8/2/20 Post); Item #1.O. Added 2 FIDI at $15.46 (10/24/20 Post)
Sponsor's Website: FIDI | ETF Snapshot - Fidelity
Holdings as of 5/28: 116
Profit = $.55New Average Cost per share = $16.17 (20 shares)
Snapshot Intraday 5/28/21 after pare |
Dividends: Quarterly at a variable rate
I have turned off dividend reinvestment.
2020 Dividend Total per share = $.615
Yield at $16.17 using $.615 = 3.8%
O. Issuer Redemption of Baby Bond OPINI at the $25 Par Value:
$25 par value x. 15 shares |
Profit Snapshot: +$116.12
Investment Category: Exchange Traded Baby Bonds, a subcategory of Exchange Traded Bonds
Buy Discussion: Item # 3.B. Bought 10 OPINI at $18.45; 2 at $15.6; 3 at $14.38 (3/21/20)
OPINI was a 5.875% senior unsecured baby bond issued by Office Properties Income Trust. As with other exchange-traded bonds, the issuer reserve the right to redeem at par value five years after the IPO. The optional call date was on or after 5/26/21. Unless the issuer exercised that call option, the bond would have matured in 2046. That kind of option creates asymmetric interest rate risk in favor of the issuer. Call protection only lasts for five years and then an optional redemption is allowed at par value (no make-whole provision).
The yield at my $17.86 AC per share was 10.86%. The purchases were made in March 2020 when the prices for exchange-traded bonds were in freefall, a normal and expected occurrence during periods of extreme stock market turbulence (VIX spiking) with common stock prices collapsing. 3 shares were filled at $14.38 even though my limit price was at $14.75 and that limit was below the then-current bid price when placed. See generally, Item # 1. Fear and Enhanced Volatility in Certain Classes of Income Securities (8/9/2011 Post)
The volatile downside price action in these securities was most pronounced during the Near Depression period (2008 and into 2009). The best buy that I made during that period, based on subsequent history, was a $25 par value REIT equity preferred stock that paid cumulative dividends at 8.75%. The purchase price was at $2.9 (75.43% yield at $2.9), no dividend payments were missed, and the issuer ultimately redeemed at the $25 par value. The risk for an equity preferred stock owner is that the downside is a zero price in bankruptcy.
3. Cash Flow into Fidelity Taxable Account on 6/15/21:
I have now turned off dividend reinvestment for almost all common stocks owned as I reduce risk. The following snapshots also highlight my current inch-deep, mile-wide approach to risk mitigation.
I only own 5 ARGD shares in this account that were bought during the March 2020 meltdown at $11.6 (14.01% yield) and currently rated at BBB- by S & P:
Snapshot as of close on 6/15/21 |
I own 100 shares in my Schwab taxable account.
Snapshots show the recent quarterly interest payment and the acquisition prices for those shares:
Quarterly Interest Payment ARGD |
Values as of 6/15/21 closing price |
The National Rural Utilities Corporation and Goldman Sachs bonds pay monthly interest and are either 1 or 2 bond lots. Those bonds were bought at par value and were offered as part of Fidelity's corporate notes program. Those bonds are offered primarily to retail investors and are generally illiquid given the small number of bonds outstanding.
The Lexington REIT (LXP) $1K par value bonds shown in the snapshot above pay interest semi-annually:
Lot details as of Close on 6/15/21 |
FINRA Page 4.4% Lexington 2024
FINRA Page 4.25% Lexington 2023
The Ventas 2023 position is 2 bonds with interest paid semi-annually.
The Crown Castle, Discovery Financial, DTE Energy, and Martin Marietta Materials bonds are 1 bond lots that pay semi-annually.
FINRA Page 3.7% Crown Castle 2026
FINRA Page 3.375% Discover Financial 2026 (illiquid and rarely traded)
FINRA Page 3.3% DTE Energy 2022
BFINRA Page 3.5% Martin Marietta Materials 2027
The largest dollar common stock position reflected in the snapshots belongs to Kellogg at 23+ shares with an average cost per share of $60.66.
In this account, I own only a 10 share position in the BDC Horizon Technology Finance Corp. (HRZN) which pays dividends monthly:
Item # 1. Bought 10 HRZN at $9.29 (6/20/20 Post), previously sold 30 at $11.8. Item # 1.B. Sold 30 HRZN at $11.8 (11/18/18 Post) The last reported net asset value per share was $11.07. 10-Q on page 3.
I have taken larger positions in Horizon's exchange-traded baby bonds but it has called those.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sale of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals, and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and my family members.
I see a lot of paring activity.
ReplyDeleteSo the short <1 month trips under 20 is not pre-indicator of starting to head to stable VIX (after a possible nother spike)?
---
JPM hoarding cash for inflation. With inflation you should be in stocks or something that can inflate. Cash is a losing strategy. So that's a surpising action by Dimon.
It reads, that it's a short term hoard with anticipation that the wait for better rates will be short enough to catch them for better returns, before the inflation deflates the cash hoarded.
Dimon isn't saying in that article, but is he expecting a pullback based on inflation spooking the market about Fed action and inaction? That's the way I see raising cash here on inflation, to make sense.
I think inflation will built on itself and not fully self-correct. Except if recession type conditions arrive. But either way it's not good for the market. (This amount of inflation's fine for the market, but since investors will panic.)
---
Democracy - the exodus from Egypt is symbolic. It's movement from a kingdomship (Pharoah) with special treatment to a set of laws that apply to all humans equally. Starting with 10 commandments. Before that the Hammurabi code had different punishments for the same crime depending on your societal status. Moses because de-facto leader but not dictator. People had a say. The start of not quite democracy, but a paradigm shift in that direction.
Rolling forward, at some point the Israelites decided they WANTED a king. That's when there was King Solomon, and David and then a host of others, some good, some not so capable.
It's glossed over. But an interesting feature of history, that the image and strength in leadership of a king, has so much appeal.
---
"Italians used satellites to manipulate voting equipment"
The cottage cheese is falling out of some brains.
Land: Jaimie Dimon apparently believes that a rise in inflation will result in higher interest rates which is what normally can be expected to happen, but the CBs have abandoned normalcy over a decade ago.
ReplyDeleteThe opposite occurred last week. Rates went down, not up, in response to a hot inflation report.
In the past, a 5% annual CPI rate and a predicted annual average inflation rate of 2.4% over the next 10 years would mean at least a 10 year treasury near 4.5% and at least a 2%-2.5% FF rate, or far higher than now.
The FED, ECB, BOJ, and other CBs are not going to allow interest rates to normalize regardless of what happens to inflation and they control interest rates. It is possible that one or more of those CBs will abandon their extraordinarily abnormal monetary policies with inflation remaining hot for another year or two, but then it would be too late to do anything about it without causing a recession and low rates again.
I can say that rates are so low for quality debt that there is not much difference between holding cash earning close to zero and buying a short term high quality bond maturing in 2 years.
All treasury rates are likely to produce negative real rates of return when held to maturity. The yield on the 1 and 2 year treasuries are at .09% and .26%. The 1 month is at .05%.
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield
I am in a cash hoarding mode as well. If I put $1M in a 2 year treasury note at .26%, the annual interest would be $2,600 vs $500 for the 1 month. If short rates go up, the 1 month may end up producing more income, and I would not be locked into a 2 year note that would have to be sold at a loss to invest the proceeds into a higher yielding security. Needless to say, I have no interest in any treasury bond now, 1 month to 30 years.
I am still receiving a weighted average 3% tax free yield on my Tennessee municipal bonds based on an average cost basis below par value. So I am not even going to try and sell any of those bonds in order to harvest gains.
The CBs control shorter term rates.
DeleteIs it possible to see longer term, commercial market, rates climb up, while short term are held down?
That would be the opposite of a recession indicator (short term higher than long term). I wonder how what would play out and what would be the wise place to invest. (Not Real estate because if mortgage rates climb, house buying will stall out more.)
I've expressed no interest at getting into gov't bonds or anything short term. To get a decent rate, well you can't. To get a less than insanely low rate, you have to lock in for many years. I will be better off waiting to get in stocks with divs during the next crash, and getting near nothing till then.
Land: Intermediate and longer term rates are influenced to some decree by a FF rate near zero, but the main control mechanism is QE.
DeleteIt remains to be seen whether the FED will lose control over longer term rates. FED holdings now exceed $7.431 trillion.
https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/soma-holdings
There is an historical parallel where the FED, for several years after WWII, kept the ten year treasury below 2.5% even though inflation was running hot with several annual increases over 5% and one at almost 15% (8.5% in 1946; 14.4% in 1947; 7.7% in 1948; 7.9% in 1951)
https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11485/c11485.pdf
It helps in that rate suppression that other major countries are pursuing the same policies. Several sovereign bonds have negative yields through 10 years, notwithstanding 2+% inflation and rising.
I would just accept that the FED can suppress interest rates below the inflation rate for an extended period. The end result after the suppression occurring roughly between 1945 to 1951 was the start of a 32 year bear market in bonds even with inflation being mostly tame until the late 1960s. Once the FED stopped suppressing rates, the ten year naturally rose to around 4.5% even though inflation numbers after 1951 through 1964 were mostly in the 1% to 2% range.
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator/consumer-price-index-1913-
==
Just spent almost $8K to replace my old air conditioning/heating unit. You may have put a jinx on me.
My computer only imitated yours for a day. Your climate unit isn't supposed to take the imitation all the way. Sigh. At least it was pretty fast replacement. Welcome to the age of more efficiency... my niece was very pleased with my energy star upgrade. I'm sure she'd be pleased about yours too.
DeleteI haven't had to turn it on since replacing. But looks like tomorrow I will (temps into mid-90s.)
---
Guess it remains to be seen how all this plays out. There's a historic prescient of a rate/inflation disconnect. A long time ago. But Fed & CBs are so dedicated to their dovishness in modern times (hawkish articles not withstanding).
If bonds go bear, then stocks will benefit. Works for me.
Though would be nice if in retirement age, I could just buy some US bonds and be assured of capital preservation.
I've been saying something's going to give. Something under the surface not yet apparent. This is part of that. But, importantly a but, it's not apparent yet. And it took a long time after subprimes were known about for the market to react. So there's time.
Land: I recall reading your comment on laptops but must have deleted it. Yesterday was a bad day here at HQ with the inside temperature hitting 86 until my new air conditioner unit was installed late yesterday.
ReplyDeleteYesterday, the stock market basically nullified the downside action from last Friday.
Regional bank stocks recovered as interest rates ticked up by an irrelevant amount.
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE)
$65.91 +$2.57 (+4.06%)
At close: June 21 4:00PM EDT
The 10 year treasury yield closed at 1.5%, up from 1.45% the previous day. The yield was at 1.6% on 6/1/21, so all of these minor movements up and down by a few basis points provide no guidance about where interest rates are headed.
I noticed that Cramer thought investors were buying CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) because of the name:
Cramer: “Here’s the problem with CRISPR, if they called it anything else other than CRISPR, people wouldn’t be drawn to it, but people are so into CRISPR stuff they’re like, ‘Oh, let me buy this one.’ I’ve got to tell you: I honestly would prefer to see you in Vertex, which has just got hammered, or Regeneron, where the news is very good.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/16/cramers-lightning-round-amd-is-a-buy-right-here-right-now-.html
While there can be a legitimate debate about whether CRSP will ultimately prove successful with its gene editing technology, the trial results for CTX001 so far do support optimism and consequently make Cramer's remarks uninformed and silly. Perhaps someone needs to inform Cramer that Vertex just paid $900M for a 10% interest in CTX001 (plus another 200M when and if approved by the FDA), bringing its stake up to 60%.
https://www.biospace.com/article/vertex-slams-down-900-million-to-expand-sickle-cell-and-thalassemia-partnership-with-crispr-therapeutics/
Ugh I don't think my house hit over 81-2 while waiting. And that made it hard to think at all. It then took a few days with better temps before I started to feel more normal again.
DeleteThere wasn't much happening with the market, so I didn't think about it at first. But with the pattern of posting different than usual, I didn't know if something more worrisome than a defunct A/C happened.
----
Crammer's way off. He's had a few odd commentaries lately. Though I'm not sure that's unusual. But even for him, several didn't make sense out of the topic at hand (I don't remember what the topic was. Bubbles or ?).
Even if investors are buying because of the name, they're buying. Part of marketing is a good name. True, it's kind of a lame reason, but it doesn't matter if it's lame. I doubt it's why it's getting bought. But even if it were, it'd still be a reasonable reason to add positive to the buy argument.
I'd suspect reason to buy are reasons that drew my attention, like management seems strong, results are reasonable, research into good areas, and cleanly positioned on this topic without lots of other business efforts to confuse things.
I did notice in an article, there are competitors developing treatments using crisper technology, and wanted to look at them, or buying a mix of them instead of only CSRP. I hadn't had a chance to import it from cellphone and post it yet. Not Vertex, actual competitors.
---
My loptop comment wasn't so much about laptops. It was a venting on the topic of spam and the humor of it all.
I'd received a spam recommending that I buy a loptop from them, since they have very good prices. You know you're a loser in the spam game when you can't even spell, what you're selling (to avoid spam detectors). I was saying that .... I don't know if they have good prices, since I've never priced out a loptop.
And while they haven't tempted me to buy a laptop, they did get me to picturing bunnies hopping around, as the more likely image of a Loptop.
Land: I will throw some money at gene editing stocks. In addition to CRSP, I own EDIT, which I have not discussed here.
DeleteI recently discussed BMRN which has gene editing therapy for hemophilia A.
Other companies include BEAM and NTLA.
Larger drug companies have formed partnerships with those smaller companies (e.g. VRTX with CRSP; REGN with NTLA).
REGN-NTLA
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/regeneron-and-intellia-therapeutics-expand-collaboration-to-develop-crisprcas9-based-treatments-301068238.html
https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/05/crispr-101-what-investors-need-to-know/?source=djc&utm_source=djc&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&mod=mw_quote_news
Here's the two crsp articles I'd found had info.
Deletehttps://finance.yahoo.com/news/crispr-crsp-positive-gene-therapy-145002816.html
It has details on CRSP.
They added, "other than CRISPR Therapeutics, companies such as Editas Medicine EDIT, Intellia Therapeutics NTLA and Beam Therapeutics, among others, are also using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology to develop their respective candidates for addressing various ailments."
This one has technical readings.
https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/the-correction-in-crispr-therapeutics-is-over-so-let-s-do-some-buying-15683671
The field is considered hot. It's already done that 1st parabolic. But now it's ready for real possibilities.
----
F up 3.7%. Maybe because Cramer recommending Ford and Apple:
"Apple, Ford Among 'Low-Effort' Buys Right Now, Says Cramer" on Benzinga (my access is thru ameritrade)
Or that cars.com listed Ford Mustang as #2. The F150 is a big hit. So adding a 2nd positive, adds dimension.
---
I was wondering if variants were triggering the market stall.
Media doesn't seem too worried. This thread has a lot of details. A verified (blue check account) doctor but it's on twitter.
https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1402062059890786311?s=20
---
Today I put on winter pjs. It was 68 inside. Hard to imagine when Monday was mid-90s outside and over 80 inside.
Land: Cramer's comment on CRSP made it look like the company had no substance at all in that buyers were being fooled into taking positions just because of the name. He dished CRSP while recommending VRTX that laid out $900M in cash (+$200M when approved) for a 10% interest in a CRSP invented therapy CTX001.
DeleteCRSP could be a $1,000 stock in 5 to 10 years or a $10 stock, or somewhere in between. I do not know what will happen.
Gene editing technology, which is relatively new, may very well end up being an integral part of medicine's future. So, from my point of view, it is worth investing some money in stocks that are venturing into that field. Currently, I own CRSP, BMRN and EDIT and have a VRTX position.
Of the ten stocks mentioned in this article, I currently own BMRN, CRM, INCY, and VRTX.
https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1043435/10-promising-stocks-to-consider
I would emphasize that I have no expertise in science or medicine, and my positions will be small in the companies named above.
My largest dollar purchase today was 100 ORAN at $11.6 which I classify as a bond substitute.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/oran?mod=over_search
My system qualifies for the Fed tax credit of $300. Yours?
DeleteForm:
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f5695.pdf
Instructions:
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i5695.pdf
Site to look up all rebates. None exist in my area:
https://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program
Land: My system is a packaged system with a SEER = 14 which should qualify:
Deletehttps://www.energystar.gov/about/federal_tax_credits/non_business_energy_property_tax_credits
I will double check.
Land: The installer was not helpful on the tax credit issue, so I had to do some digging. While the unit is a packaged system with a SEER 14 rating, it has not been certified as eligible for the tax credit.
DeleteShoot. That's unfortunate. For heat pumps it needs to be 16 seer. I replaced inside and out which makes it easier to get a match. The installer offered the AHRI reference #, & it turned out to qualify.
DeleteHe didn't participate with the local electric company's $400 rebate, though his price matched those that did. I took that to be a flag, and checked his history with the regulatory agency. All was okay.
A scatter approach to gene splicing seems good. It's already a proven technology with the CarT curing previously incurable patients. So it's going somewhere eventually.
DeleteCramer can move market in the stock. But research showed that you did better betting against him than with him after those initial moves.
He mentioned LKQ. I didn't notice what his judgement was, but it got my attention because it's this new business model for used car parts, which emails you went they get a car on their lots. I was struggling and calling around for some part, when I came across them. It was a relief to be able to go online, get the info I needed for what was on their lots, and part prices, etc, in mins instead of with lots of calls.
Same as so many other stocks, they've risen a lot lately, but when it's time to buy into the market, this looks like it may be a good company for the sector of used parts. Not much debt.
ORAN 's a nice div near 10%.
DeleteIt's gaping down so much. Though now near support. I'd rather buy here, than high. But they look like they're running into trouble?
Land: The ORAN dividend is paid out semi-annually and went ex dividend shortly before my purchase. The stock decline on the 6/11 ex-dividend date by more than the dividend amount and then fell again by $.21 on 6/23 when I bought my 100 share lot. Sometimes that kind of decline happens with high yielding stocks on and shortly after the ex dividend date.
DeleteBroker reports available to Schwab customers include Morningstar (4 stars with a $16.8 fair value); Argus (Buy) and S & P at 5 stars with a 12 month PT of $14. On 6/10, Barclays downgraded to underweight. Goldman Sachs downgraded to neutral from buy on 5/11. So those downgrades are probably weighing on the stock some.
France charges a transaction tax that cost me $3.48 on a 100 share purchase at $11.6 ($1,160 x. 003%). I generally wait for a a stock subject to that tax to fall by more than the tax before buying which was the case on 6/23 when the price fell by $.21 per share.
I would generally categorize telecommunication stocks as a disfavored sector at the present. That would include AT & T and foreign companies like ORAN and TEF.
The ORAN dividend yield will fluctuate in part due to the EUR/USD conversion rate. The dividend per ADR in 2020 was $.71 or a 6.12% yield at $11.6. There was a larger than normal first semi-annual payment this year at $.5968 per share vs. $.2261 in 2020.
"Splunk Announces $1 Billion Investment from Silver Lake"
ReplyDeletehttps://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210622005703/en/
Splunk Inc. (SPLK)
$139.13 +13.67 +10.89%
Last Updated: Jun 22, 2021 at 10:03 a.m. EDT
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/splk?mod=over_search
Fidelity is more screwed up than Schwab regarding crediting the proper amount for the Essex optional bond redemption discussed in this post.
ReplyDeleteAt least Schwab did get around to crediting me with the $465.65 make whole payment for 10 bonds.
Fidelity has still not credited the make whole payment made for the 7 bonds owned in a family member's account that I manage, which prompted an email to that broker this morning about how disconcerting it is that a customer has to monitor these matters.
That's serious. Most assume the company's paperwork and accounting will be accurate and don't even check.
DeleteIt raises a question of how accidental it is. And how much they're paying out only once asked. Apparently with Fidelity, not even after asked.
Land: It has now been 9 days since Essex made its optional redemption payment and Fidelity still has not credited the make whole payment.
DeleteI have run into more serious issues with brokers.
The most serious was with TD Ameritrade when almost $5K was transferred out of my account to another account owned by some unknown person. I complained and the money was moved back into my account. Then the money was moved out again to that unknown account. I complained again and the money was moved back. And then out it went again. Eventually I was given 3 free trades by TD Ameritrade for my trouble. I later moved my account to another broker.
I'm mostly with TD Ameritrade. I haven't been looking closely. It used to be easy - with paper statements that came in the mail. I find having to go look online seems easier to miss doing. Maybe I better be more diligent, hum.
DeleteWell, every few months I've been totally my portfolio and seeing how things are balanced out. So I would have caught something.
I'm surprised with any financial institution, that an error like that occurred and even more, that it repeated. That should have involved a senior person's assistant, personally managing the problem & keeping an eye on it. Three trades? About 100 would have been appropriate.
Land: The more serious problems arise when an incorrect account number is used somewhere in the accounting and transaction processes which was what happened in the TD Ameritrade situation. A husband was trying to transfer money from his account to his wife and may account number was being used. When I called the money would be sent back to my account. Then he would call after his wife complained and my money would then be sent to his wife.
DeleteI have had the same problem occur in bank accounts. I noticed, for example, a major withdrawal out of my Mother's account to the IRS. Someone had entered her account number to pay their tax obligation.
I've never seen or heard of anyone having problems like that. Maybe it's since things have gone so electronic. A simple coding mistake can now allow such problems to slip through. I will need to be more vigilant.
DeleteACH transfers are supposed to require that the accounts linked have the identical owner names. Even using my nickname (similar to my full name) caused a problem on one connection. And use micro deposits on both sides. And I had to answer a bunch of security questions for other connections.
The software is truly lacking if a husband can put in the wrong account number, and it connects and works for transferring.
Why did I have to spent 8 mins identifying stop signs on a catcha, because it did not believe I wasn't a robot, no matter how many times I growled at my computer, non-robotically?
I have published a new post:
ReplyDeletehttps://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2021/06/amom-bam-ctt-cva-dnngy-ebix-glq-rt-gnl.html