Saturday, January 30, 2021

BAB, BDGE, BK, CATY, FITB, FAX, FHB, FITB, FTS, HBAN, K, NBTB, OGE, PEAK, TD, TPVG, VIAC/Fidelity Taxable Account Bond Positions

Economy

Real GDP growth in the 2020 4th quarter was reported at an annualized 4%. The estimate was for 4.3%. GDP shows economy grew at 4% annual pace at the end of 2020 - MarketWatchGross Domestic Product, 4th Quarter and Year 2020 (Advance Estimate) | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)  This estimate is the first one . 

While the 4th quarter GDP estimate will be revised some, real GDP decreased 3.5% last year, compared to the a 2.2% increase in 2019, using the current 4th quarter estimate: 


And that decline was with massive deficit spending by the federal government.  

U.S. Growth Slowed at Year’s End, but Economists See Acceleration as 2021 Advances | Barron's 2020 was the largest decline in real GDP since the contraction in 1946 which resulted from WWII ending in 1945. 

Personal consumption expenditures declined .2% last month measured in current dollars: 


Initial claims for unemployment insurance for the week ending 1/23/20 decreased to 847K from an upwardly revised 914K for the prior week. 

Fed decision January 2021: rates unchanged

Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement (1/27/21)("The pace of the recovery in economic activity and employment has moderated in recent months, with weakness concentrated in the sectors most adversely affected by the pandemic. . . The path of the economy will depend significantly on the course of the virus, including progress on vaccinations. The ongoing public health crisis continues to weigh on economic activity, employment, and inflation, and poses considerable risks to the economic outlook.")

November home prices rose 9.5%, one of the highest gains on record, Case-Shiller says

Biden’s covid relief plan struggles to get GOP support - The Washington Post; republished at MSN: Turned off by Biden’s approach, GOP opposition to stimulus relief intensifies

++++

Markets and Market Commentary

The stock market is at or near the most-expensive levels ever by most measures. When will it matter? No one knows the answer to that question. The charts contained in this article use only recent history data. A longer time period makes some valuation measures look worse now. An example is the median forward P/E of 21.2 times which is far too high historically using a 50 or 70 year time frame. Maybe a median 21.2 x. estimated forward 12 months Non-GAAP earnings is close when looking at the past 25 years. S&P 500 PE Ratio - 90 Year Historical Chart | MacroTrends; and see S&P 500 PE Ratio (median at 14.84 TTM GAAP); Figures 1 and 2: S&P 500 Trailing P/E Ratios (GAAP and Non-GAAP (since 1989), Figure 4: median S& P 500 TTM non-GAAP P/E = 15.1 since 1935).

How to trade the Biden era? BAC strategist gives 3 stock-market themes- MarketWatch (GDP sensitive stocks; discount retailers; environmental and social stocks)

New-home construction activity soars to highest level in over a decade, as builders rush to produce single-family homes - MarketWatch

DuPont, Corteva, and Chemours announce resolution of legacy PFAS claims ("According to the terms of the cost sharing arrangement, DuPont and Corteva together, on one hand, and Chemours, on the other hand, agree to a 50-50 split of certain qualified expenses incurred over a term not to exceed twenty years or $4 billion of qualified spend and escrow contributions in the aggregate.")

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT Announces Redemption of 8.250% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock I still own shares with the largest positions in my Schwab and Fidelity taxable accounts (15 shares at an AC of $17.26 at Fidelity and 20 shares with an AC of $22.05 at Schwab). I lost some shares to two separate partial redemptions last year. As with many other preferred stocks, the price had a meltdown last March which is always something that I monitor when common stocks are in swan dive mode:   


 
4th quarter earnings reports-owned common stocks

Arrow Financial (AROW) Reports Annual Net Income of $40.8 million and Continued COVID-19 Response (2020 E.P.S. at $2.64, up 8.9% Y-O-Y; 4th quarter E.P.S. at $.81 up from $.63 in the 2019 4th quarter-1 analyst estimate at $.75; NIM = 2.99%; Efficiency Ratio = 50.77%; NPA Ratio = .18%; Coverage Ratio = 456.3%; Charge off ratio = .05%; Tangible book value per share = $20.02; Total risk based capital ratio = 15.48%)

AT&T Reports Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Results {GAAP E.P.S. = ($1.95) with non-cash charges including a $15.5B writedown of DirectTV investment; Adjusted E.P.S. $.75, down from $.89 in 2019 4th quarter-consensus at $.73 on adjusted basis according to Dow Jones; free cash flow = $7.7B; net +1.2M net postpaid subscribers vs consensus at 561K;  Warner Media revenues down 9.5% due to pandemic, though HBO revenues increased 12% Y-O-Y-HBO MAX subscriber growth; 617K customers cancelled pay-TV (Direct-TV and AT& T TV); wireline business revenues down 6%}  I am not a fan but own a few shares as a bond substitute.

BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) Generates Strong Earnings of $20.9 Million in 2020 (E.P.S. reported at $.41 per share vs. consensus at $.22 according to Fidelity and up from $.29 in the 2019 4th quarter; NPL Ratio = .7%; Coverage ratio = 205.2%; NIM3.25%; "Total noninterest income increased by $2.7 million, or 267.1 percent, to $3.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2020, from $1.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2019. The increase in total noninterest income was mainly related to a higher unrealized gain of equity securities of $989,000, higher gains on the sale of investment securities of $700,000, BOLI income of $648,000, and higher gains on the sale of loans of $408,000.", see Bank-Owned Life Insurance (BOLI))  

Beazer Homes Reports Strong First Quarter Fiscal 2021 Results (E.P.S. $.40 vs. consensus at $.295 according to Fidelity; "dollar value of backlog of $1,162.4 million, up 58.8%"; "Unrestricted cash at quarter end was $244.6 million; total liquidity was $494.6 million")

Citizens & Northern (CZNC) Announces 2020 4th quarter results (non-GAAP E.P.S. at $.51 vs. consensus at $.42; GAAP E.P.S. of $.43 included a one time $1.6M loss associated with an early repayment of long term borrowings and merger related expenses related to the acquisition of Covenant Financial; "net gains from sales of loans of $1,472,000 for the fourth quarter 2020 were up $1,166,000 from the total for the fourth quarter 2019. The increase reflects an increase in volume of mortgage loans sold, due mainly to the impact of historically low interest rates on the housing market and refinancing activity."; AUM up9.5% Y-O-Y; tangible book value per share = $15.3)

CNB Financial Corporation (CCNE Reports Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings per Share of $0.40 (GAAP E.P.S. at $.40; Non-GAAP E.P.S. of $.75 which excludes a $5.9M charge ($.35 per share) resulting from paying back early the entire FHLB borrowing; the adoption during the 4th quarter of CECL led to an increase reserve for loan losses; Charge off ratio: .21%; NIM = 3.58%; NPA Ratio = .67%; tangible book value per share = $18.66; total risk based capital ratio = 14.29%: "As of December 31, 2020, the COVID-19 related loans with deferred loan payment arrangements, totaled $151.0 million, or 4.5% of total loans outstanding, consisting of 112 loans, totaling $107.2 million, for which principal and interest were deferred, and 55 loans, totaling $43.8 million, for which principal only was deferred."; view the loan deferrals as a significant negative given the total amount and the amount where interest and principal amounts are being deferred)

Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results (E.P.S. $.84 vs. $.696 consensus according to Fidelity and up from $.79 in the 2019 4th quarter; NPL Ratio = .26%; NPA ratio = .25%; coverage ratio = 541%; tangible book value per share = $23.52;  NIM = 3.13%, down from 3.33% in the 2019 4th quarter; $1.597M gain from sales of loans held for sale, up from $324K in the 2019 4th quarter with 2020 gains at $3.858M up from $1.677M in 2019) 

First Choice Bancorp Announces 2020 4th Quarter Results (FCBP)(E.P.S. $.92 vs. $.66 estimate according to Fidelity; NIM = 4.31%; tangible book value per share =  $17.29 up $1.59 from 2019 4th Q; Efficiency Ratio = 44.4%; ROA = 1.88%; ROE = 15.44%; NPL Ratio = .34%; NPA Ratio = .28%; Coverage Ratio = 297.35%; Charge Off Ratio = .07%; Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Asset Ratio = 9.18%; as with many other regional banks, earnings were juiced by "Gain on Sale of Loans", reported at $3.286M compared to $947K in the 2019 4th quarter)

Lockheed Martin Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results (continuing operations E.P.S. at $6.38 vs. $6.4 consensus according to Marketwatch; 2021 E.P.S. guidance between $26 to  $26.2 with revenues between $67.1B to $68.5B vs. FactSet consensus at $26.18 and and $67.97B in revenues)

People's United Financial (PBCT) Reports Fourth Quarter Net Income of $207.7 Million, or $0.49 per Common Share (operating earnings at $.35 vs. $.33 average estimate; GAAP earnings included a one gain from selling People's United Insurance Agency that netted a pre-tax gain of $75.9M or $.14 per share; NIM at 2.84%, down from 3.14% Y-O-Y; efficiency ratio at 55.4%; Charge off ratio = .12%; Coverage ratio = 129.1%; NPA ratio = .78%; declared quarterly dividend of $.18 per share)  

Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI) Announces Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2020 (E.P.S. at $.89 vs. $.64 consensus; NIM = 3%; NPL Ratio = .21%; NPA Ratio = .25%;Charge off ratio = .02%; Coverage ratio = 635.29%; total risk based capital ratio  = 21.78%;  ROTE = 18.71%; ROA = 1.64%)

3M Reports Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2020 Results; Provides Full-Year 2021 Guidance (E.P.S. $2.38 vs. $2.15 consensus according to Marketwatch; sales up 5.8%; 2021 guidance = $9.2 to $9.7) 

Washington Trust Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2020 Earnings (E.P.S. at $1.07 vs. consensus at $.97 according to Fidelity; 2020 E.P.S. at $4 up from $3.96 in 2019; NIM 2.39%; ROA = 1.28%; ROE = 13.96%; ROTE =16.1%; Efficiency Ratio = 56.9%; Tangible Book value per share at $26.87; NPL Ratio = .31%; NPA Ratio = .23%; Coverage Ratio = 334.21%) 

Biden administration looks set to target ‘forever chemicals,’ as 3M warns about ‘onerous regulation’ - MarketWatch The main target appears to be PFAS.  The Biden Plan to Secure Environmental Justice and Equitable Economic Opportunity | Joe Biden for President: Official Campaign Website

Short Squeezes

Individual investors are taking on hedge funds who have significant short positions. 

I do not short individual stocks. I do not recall even discussing the short interest position in a stock since I started this blog in 2008.  

A significant number of stocks experienced wild gyrations in price movements last week as the short sellers and long investors engaged in their battle royal. GameStop Corporation (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc  are the stocks that received the most press attention. 

I have no doubt that some sophisticated investors have joined the party at least temporarily.    

While I do not buy any stock based on the short position, and almost invariably do not even know what it is before making a purchase, my contrarian value style of investing will naturally end up selecting a few stocks that are subjects of extensive short selling. 

An example is AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). 

AMCX short interest as a percentage of the float is listed at 59.01% in this 1/26/21 article. Another GameStop? Here Are the Next 10 Most Shorted Small-Caps. | Barron's Another website has the short interest percentage of the float at 57.8% as of 1/15/21. AMCX Short Interest Ratio (AMC Networks) | MarketBeat AMCX bought back 26.6% of its shares last October at $23.2, which of course reduced the float substantially. AMC Networks Announces Final Results of Modified Dutch Auction Tender Offer 

AMCX is a different company from AMC Entertainment.

I bought 15 AMCX shares last September. Item # 1.I (9/26/20 Post)(multiple small ball purchases with an average cost of $21.85).  

Last Wednesday, the share price spiked intraday to $73 before closing at $48.27. The close on Friday was at  $49.42 +1.68  +3.52%.

3 month AMCX Chart:

 


Unlike GME, AMC Networks is currently profitable with good cash flow generation. Based on last Fridays closing price of $325 for GME (up $131.4 that day), GME's market cap is $22.67B and the consensus E.P.S. estimate for 2021 is -$2.1. The share price was in the $4-$5 range last August

AMCX on the other hand currently has a consensus E.P.S. estimate of $7.53 this year, so one has to wonder why the short interest is so high. AMC Networks Free Cash Flow 2010-2020-MacroTrendsAMCX Free Cash Flow | AMC Networks - GuruFocus.com  

A few Lottery Ticket purchases will be in heavily shorted stocks as well.

One of my recent Lotto purchases was in EBIXItem # 2.N.(11/13/20 Post)(AC then at $20.27) EBIX pays a quarterly dividend. EBIX Dividend History | Nasdaq

As of 1/15/21, YF had the short position as a percentage of the float at 32.52%. I believe it had been higher earlier. 

Like some other heavily shorted stocks that I own, EBIX spiked much higher last Wednesday, hitting an intraday high of $64.14. The close yesterday was at $52.07.  

3 month EBIX Chart

These price movements have nothing to do with what a company is worth IMO but to market dynamics unrelated to fundamentals. 

I did eliminate last week two positions in heavily shorted stocks (SKT and DISCA) and pared IRM (7 shares) and EBIX (1 share) 

++++

Covid

With Donald no longer the President, I can say that the pandemic is not under control in the real world: 

As of 1/29/21 

It was "under control", or a hoax, or non-threatening, only in the Alternate Reality of TrumpWorld inhabited by millions of Trumpsters. 

Johnson & Johnson Announces Single-Shot Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate Met Primary Endpoints in Interim Analysis of its Phase 3 ENSEMBLE Trial

Covid vaccine: J&J says its 66% effective, but the single shot may fall short against variants

The Stock Jocks are becoming more concerned, depending on the day or hour, with how effective the vaccines will be combating the Covid variants. 

My feeling is that Covid will be around for the remainder of my life. Annual vaccinations, as with the flu, will be the new normal. 

Drugs, vaccines less effective vs new virus variants; antibody cocktail may protect patients' contacts | Reuters

Novavax stock soars more than 20% after COVID-19 vaccine study shows nearly 90% efficacy in U.K., but less against new South African variant - MarketWatch

Dr. Fauci: Double mask during Covid makes common sense, more effectiveTime to double mask or upgrade masks as coronavirus variants emerge, experts say - The Washington Post ("As with other parts of the pandemic response, the United States lags behind other parts of the world when it comes to masks. Several Asian countries, including Singapore and Korea, have mass-produced high-quality masks to send directly to residents.") I have started to double mask with a 3 layer cloth mask covered by a 3 layer surgical mask. 

Minnesota confirms first known U.S. case of more contagious Covid variant originally found in Brazil

Moderna CEO says the world will have to live with Covid 'forever'

This Over-the-Counter Medication Can Kill COVID, Study Says | Best Life I have been using a standard saline nasal spray to flush on the sinus passages. 

+++

Don the Authoritarian-His Legacy

KGB groomed Trump as an asset for 40 years, former Russian spy says | The Times of Israel

One of Donald's legacies will be the number of false statements made by him during his 4 years as President. 

The WP has finished its tally and came up with 30,573 untruthful statements made by Donald during his 4 year term as President. The longer Trump was president the more frequently he made false or misleading claims - Washington Post 

I had faith that Donald would surpass 30,000 false statements over his 4 years as President and gave that number as my estimate over 2 years ago. Even if he had gone over 100,000 false statements, 80% of republicans would still view him as honest. 

Fact checkers did not cause republicans to question Donald's veracity but simply reinforced  their beliefs that Donald was honest. Psychologists need to do more research on why that occurs.   

Trump weighed firing of acting AG Rosen to pursue vote fraud claims: USA Todays

Trump and Justice Dept. Lawyer Said to Have Plotted to Oust Acting AG - The New York Times The purpose was to use the DOJ in Trump's effort to overturn the certified election results. After Barr resigned, Jeffrey Rosen became Acting Attorney General. Rosen refused Trump's demands that the DOJ intervene on his behalf.    

In a subsequent article, the NYT revealed that congressman Scott Perry (R-PA) was part of the conspiracy to undermine the DOJ's independence. The only reason what this conspiracy failed is that virtually every senior DOJ official threatened to resign if the acting DOJ was fired and a Trump sycophant willing to do his bidding was put in charge. Pennsylvania Lawmaker Played Key Role in Trump’s Plot to Oust Acting Attorney General - The New York Times I have previously mentioned Mr. Perry unfavorably in several recent posts. I am not surprised that he was reportedly a key player in this effort. 

Trump entertained plan to install an attorney general who would help him pursue baseless election fraud claims - The Washington Post

Trump considered ousting Attorney General in push to overturn election 

DOJ watchdog to probe whether officials tried to overturn election

McCarthy voices 'concerns' with Cheney after impeachment vote - POLITICO

Capitol rioter charged with threatening to assassinate AOCCapitol riots: Garret Miller says he followed Trump orders, apologizes to AOC

Patrick McCaughey arrested for assaulting cop amid Trump mob

John Lolos: Man charged in Capitol riot identified by airport police officer after he was kicked off flight for 'continuously' yelling 'Trump 2020' The plane had to return to the airport because of the scene Mr. Lolos had created on the plane. 

Every effort is going to be made to oust the 10 House republicans who decided to obey their oath of office by voting to impeach Trump. Retaliation for doing what is right will be swift for those representatives. 10 Republicans Voted to Impeach Trump. The Backlash Has Been Swift. - The New York Times Do not expect GOP senators to obey their oath of office with a few possible exceptions. 'The trial is stupid': Senate Republicans throw cold water on Trump impeachment Trump is still the leader of America's anti-democracy party. 

The Impeachment and Trial of a Former President (Congressional Research Service publication 1/15/21) I view that article as a worthwhile read since it puts the issue in historical context and discusses arguments made by scholars before the Trump second impeachment trial. 

Most GOP senators will argue that Donald did nothing wrong. They will claim with feigned earnestness that Donald's speech on 1/6 that led to Trumpster riot was perfect, just like his call with Ukraine's President. 

Most of the remaining republican senators will hide behind arguments that an impeachment now is a moot point, unnecessarily divisive, and/or unconstitutional. 

The bottom line is most of republican senators were complicit in generating the rage that led to the assault which they will never acknowledge even though their respective contributions were obvious.  

Dominion files $1.3B defamation lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani for election claimsREAD: Dominion's lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani 

Trump Second Impeachment

The 100% pure Trumpster Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) filed a motion to dismiss the impeachment article as unconstitutional since Trump is no longer President. 

45 republican senators voted to dismiss the impeachment proceeding before a trial starts. 

I have previously identified 5 GOP senators who may be willing to obey their oath of office and vote to convict Trump for committing an obvious impeachable offense: Collins, Murkowski, Romney, Sasse and Toomey. Those 5 GOP senators voted with the 50 democrats to dismiss Paul's motion. 

Republicans Rally Against Impeachment Trial, Signaling Likely Acquittal for Trump - The New York Times; republished at MSN: Republicans Rally Against Impeachment Trial, Signaling Likely Acquittal for Trump

Nearly all GOP senators vote against impeachment trial for Trump, signaling likely acquittal - The Washington Post

With the senate having dismissed the jurisdictional argument, no senator should be able to rely on that argument when voting to acquit which has to be a decision on the merits. Several will nonetheless base their acquittal votes on that basis since they lack principles and are political cowards, more afraid of losing a primary challenge than performing their duties. 

+++

Kelli Ward-Arizona's Gift to the Democrats that keeps on giving: 

Ms. Ward, who was just reelected to another term as Chair of the Arizona Republican Party, is partly responsible for Biden winning that state and for republicans to lose both senate seats. She is a raging pure Trump cultist IMO. Republicans no longer want Republicans in the Arizona Republican Party Ms. Ward and her allies, which include the far right congressmen Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar, are causing moderate republicans to flee the party.  

Gosar's siblings push to have him removed from Congress after Capitol riot | TheHill

Trump, defending ally Kelli Ward, jumps into divisive fight over the Republican party's future. - The Washington Post (President of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce comment: “Right now on the Republican side, I don’t have a word to describe what is going on. Whatever the worst-case scenario is, this is worse.")

Before the election, Ms. Ward joined a lawsuit that sought to compel former VP Pence to reject certified election results in several states that Biden won. Arizona Republican Party joins election lawsuit against Vice President Mike PenceKelli Ward and other Arizona Republicans join Texas suit on election  

Ms. Ward just led the Arizona republican party to censure Cindy McCain, the former GOP Senator Jeff Flake and the current republican governor Ducey. Arizona GOP reelects Kelli Ward chair, censures McCain, Flake, Ducey The vote was held in an enclosed structure with most of the republicans refusing to wear a mask or to socially distance. The Arizona republican party censured John McCain when he was a senator.  

Cindy McCain's response: 

+++++

Looks like Bat Shit Crazy is the new normal in the GOP:

Republicans just love our former Dear and Great Leader who Sean Hannity referred to as a "bat shit crazy person". “Hannity Has Said to Me More Than Once, ‘He’s Crazy’”: Fox News Staffers Feel Trapped in the Trump Cult | Vanity Fair 

I will not argue with his characterization. Yet Hannity, a demagogic high school graduate, and the rest of Fox "news" pulled out all of the stops to help Donald win another 4 year term as President, notwithstanding this assessment of his mental state. 

Fox News is now defending QAnon | Salon.com

Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) indicated support for executing prominent Democrats in 2018 and 2019 before running for Congress Donald said that Ms. Greene was one of the GOP's rising stars. 

Parkland Dad Tweets Video Of Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) Harassing David Hogg 

GOP Congresswoman Blamed Wildfires on Jewish Space LaserMarjorie Taylor Greene penned conspiracy theory that a laser beam from space started deadly 2018 California wildfire | Media Matters for America

Feds charge woman allegedly heard during Capitol riot saying she was looking for Pelosi 'to shoot her in the friggin' brain'

Oregon Republican Party calls Capitol riot a 'false flag' operation to discredit GOP, silence Trump supporters The Alternate Reality that they have created for themselves is impenetrable and is constantly being reinforced by baseless conspiracy theories and demonstrably false information spread by republican politicians (Trump merely being the most prolific and well known); "news" outlets including Fox, Newsmax and OAN; and a vast array of social media outlets including Facebook and Twitter. 

Feds: Trump Supporter With Pipe Bombs Discussed Targeting Twitter, Democrats

Some Republicans Still Think Obama Was Born in Kenya (facts inconsistent with baseless conspiracy theories will simply be dismissed as "Fake News")

Donald is of course honest in TrumpWorld: 


National (US) Poll - September 23, 2020 - Biden Keeps Above 50 Percent M | Quinnipiac University Connecticut

++++

1. Eliminated VIAC-Sold 107+ at $40.18


Quote: ViacomCBS Inc. Cl B (VIAC) 

VIAC has been caught up in the short squeeze and has risen significantly in price since early January 2021. 

1 Year Chart: 


I sold these shares. I am seeing several stocks whose price spike movements have been dictated by non-fundamentals factors start to roll back down late last week.  

VIAC $48.50 -$2.10 -4.16% 

Short Interest as a % of the Float as of 1/15/21 per YF: 22.35%

VIAC Statistics -Yahoo Finance

VIAC | ViacomCBS Inc. Cl B Analyst Estimates

SEC Filings

SEC Filed Press Earnings Release for the Q/E 9/30/20 

Investor Relations - ViacomCBS Inc.

ViacomCBS Announces Completion of the Merger of CBS and Viacom (12/419) 

Profit Snapshot: +$299.07 


I sold too early. I had been psychologically traumatized by VIAC's decline shortly after I initiated the position as reflected in this 2 year chart. 

as of 1/22/21

The Old Geezer kept repeating to himself "how am I going to pay for my nursing home expenses with this kind of stock selection. 

I did not purchase VIAC stock but 100 shares of CBS that acquired Viacom and then changed its name to ViacomCBS. Item # 1 Bought 100 CBS at $38.4 (11/27/19 Post) I thereafter proceeded to average down through dividend reinvestment and the purchase of a few more shares. 

There has recently been a robust rally in content media stocks. I still own small positions in AMC Networks Inc. Cl A (AMCX) and Discovery Inc. Series A (DISCA) 

I have previously eliminated positions in other taxable accounts: 

Item #1.D. Eliminated VIAC in Fidelity Account-Sold 93+ at $27.18 (9/12/20 Post)(net profit snapshot = $74.24). That post also includes a $81.71 profit snapshot realized from selling all shares (30) held in my Vanguard account.  

2020-21 VIAC Net Profit: $455.02

2. Pared HBAN Two Accounts (highest cost lots)

A. Sold 50 HBAN in Fidelity Taxable at $14.6 and 20 at $15:  


Quote: Huntington Bancshares (HBAN)

Closing Price 1/29/21: HBAN $13.23 -$0.34 -2.54% 


Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy

Profit Snapshot: $40.58


I sold my highest cost lots profitably that were bought in January and February 2020 prior to the price collapse. Item # 2.B. Bought 50 HBAN at $14.51 (1/22/20 Post)Item # 1.D. Bought 10 HBAN at $13.5 (2/2/20 Post) 

New Average Cost this Account: $9.67  (72+ shares)

Snapshot Intraday 1/14/21

Dividend: Quarterly at $.15 per share 

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated Declares Quarterly Cash Dividends On Its Common And Preferred Stocks

Yield at AC = 6.2%

Next Ex Dividend: 3/17/21

5 Year Chart as 0f 1/22/21

Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 2.C. Added to HBAN-Bought 2 at $7.4; 1 at $7.27; 1 at $6.96; 10 at $7.92 (5/30/20 Post);  Item # 3.D. Added to HBAN-Bought 10 at $11.6; 10 at $11; 5 at $9.5; 5 at $8.4; 2 at $7.5 (3/28/20 Post) 

Last Earnings Report (12/30/20): The market reacted negatively to this report: HBAN $13.84 -$0.67 -4.62% (1/23/21). 

E.P.S. was reported at $.27 vs. consensus at $.294 according to Fidelity.  

NIM: 2.94% down from 3.12% 2019 4th Q

Efficiency Ratio: 56.9% 

Charge Off Ratio: .57%

NPA Ratio: .69%

B. Sold 14 HBAN in Vanguard account at $14.6:

See Item #2.A. above. 

Profit Snapshot: +$7.78


New Average Cost Per Share this Account: $8.57 (7+ shares)

Remaining Shares Vanguard-Snapshot Intraday 1/13/21

Yield at $8.57  = 7.00%

HBAN Realized Gains to Date: $947.66

I started to track gains from regional bank stocks in 2008.  

3. Small Ball:

A. Started FTS-Bought 5 at $40.25


Quote: Fortis Inc.-USD priced shares 

Closing Price 1/29/21: FTS $40.43 +$0.11  +0.27% 

Fortis is a large utility company based in Canada that owns 10 utility companies operating in Canada, the U.S. and the Caribbean. The total customers are about 3.3M. 

The U.S. regulated utilities are Central Hudson and UNS Energy which is the parent company of Tucson Electric Power (432K customers) and Unisource Energy (256K customers in Arizona).

The Canadian utilities include:

FortisBC 

FortisAlberta

FortisOntario

Newfoundland Power 

The company also owns ITC, "the largest electricity transmission company in the U.S."

This is my first purchase of Fortis common stock. 

I have traded its reset cumulative equity preferred stocks and currently own 150 shares FTSPRM, discussed in these posts. Item # 2.B. Bought 50 FTSPRM at C$12.4 (5/23/20 Post)Item # 3.A. Bought 50 FTSPRM at C$16.28 (3/14/20 Post)Item # 2. A. Bought 50 FTSPRM at C$17.55 (11/23/19 Post)

Fortis Inc. Cum. Redeem. 1st Pfd. Series M Stock Quote 

5 Year FTS Chart

as of 1/22/21

Dividend: Quarterly at C$.505 per share, raised from $.4775 effective for the 2020 4th quarter payment

Fortis Inc. Announces First Quarter Dividends 

The yield for owners of FTS will be depend on the CAD/USD conversion rate. 

The dividend growth history is good for a utility. 


2020 Dividends Converted into USDs = $1.45

Yield at $1.45 and $40.25 (always before taxes) = 3.6%

The recent dividend increase effective for the 2020 4th quarter payment and an anticipated increase in the 2021 4th quarter will impact the yield calculation positively this year. A more important factor may be the CAD/USD conversion rate for each payment. 

Next Ex Dividend Date: 2/12/21

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/20): Fortis Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2020 Earnings 

Net Earnings: C$292M

GAAP E.P.S. = $.63

Adjusted E.P.S. = $.65

The company sold in 2019 its Waneta Expansion hydroelectric generating facility and realized a C$484M gain. Fortis Inc. Completes Sale of Its Interest in the Waneta Expansion Hydroelectric Project 

B. Eliminated BAB-Sold 5 at $33.43


Quote: Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF Overview

Sponsor's website: Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF 

Profit Snapshot: +$18.35


Last Discussed Item # 2.A. Bought 5 BAB at $29.76 (5/30/20 Post) 

Expense Ratio: .28%

The sponsor claims that the 12 month distribution rate was 2.89% as of 1/22/21. 

I have lost interest in owning bond funds, particularly those with effective durations greater than 5 years which is the case for BAB.  

C. Started PEAK-Bought 5 at  $28.95; 5 at $28.5; 5 at $28.2



Quote: Healthpeak Properties Inc -A REIT

Closing Price 1/29/21: PEAK $29.65 -$0.36 -1.20% 

PEAK "acquires, develops, leases, owns, and manages healthcare real estate. The Company’s diverse portfolio is comprised of investments in the following reportable healthcare segments: (i) senior housing triple-net; (ii) senior housing operating portfolio (“SHOP”); (iii) continuing care retirement community (“CCRC”); (iv) life science; and (v) medical office"

The senior housing segments have been a drag on overall performance. There are 3 fundamental reasons IMO: oversupply, rising operating costs, and the pandemic. Senior Housing REITs At Risk Of ‘Sharp, Prolonged’ Credit Metric Deterioration - Senior Housing News (4/29/20)

Properties: Footnotes omitted due to sizing issue


SEC Filed 3rd quarter 2020 Supplementals 

PEAK SEC Filings 

10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/20:  NOI by business segment

Page 42

Average Cost per share : $28.55 (15 shares)

Dividend: Quarterly at $.37 per share ($1.48 annually)

Yield at AC: 5.18%

Last Ex Dividend: 11/10/20

2020 Dividend Tax Classifications

Healthpeak Properties™ Reports Third Quarter 2020 Results

Last Earnings Reports (9/30/20): 


Maximum Position: 50 Shares

Purchase Restriction: Each subsequent purchase, other than through dividend reinvestment, must lower my average cost per share. 

D. Pared FHB in Fidelity Taxable Account-Sold 10 at $25.35 and 5 at $26.13:


Quote: First Hawaiian Inc. 

Closing Price  1/29/21: FHB $23.25 -$0.93 -3.85% 

First Hawaiian Inc. Analyst Estimates 

Profit Snapshot: $7.18

New Average Cost Per Share this account: $20.49 (70-+ shares)

Snapshot Intraday 1/19/21 after pare

I referenced the first pare in a 1/6/20 comment and the strategy involved with this kind of pare. 

Investment CategoryRegional Bank Basket Strategy

Dividend: Quarterly at $.26 per share ($1.04 annually), last raised from $.24 effective for the 2019 1st quarter payment

FHB Dividend History | Nasdaq

Yield at $20.49 AC: 5.08%

Next Ex Dividend Date: 2/19/21

Dividend Reinvestment: Yes

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/30/20): This report was released after I pared the position.

First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) Reports Fourth Quarter 2020 Financial Results and Declares Dividend (GAAP E.P.S. of $.47; Non-GAAP at $.50 vs. consensus at $.44 according to Fidelity; core efficiency ratio at 45.43%; core ROA = 1.16%; core ROE = 9.51%; core ROTE = 14.95%) 

FHB Realized Gains to Date: $159.31

E. Eliminated NBTB-Sold 10+ at $35.04:

Quote: NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)

Closing Price 1/29/21: NBTB $33.01 -$0.15 -0.45% 

NBTB SEC Filings

Dividend History | NBT Bancorp

Profit Snapshot: $58.11


Investment CategoryRegional Bank Basket Strategy

Last DiscussedItem # 1.G. Restarted NBTB-Bought 2 at $31; 1 at 30.5;1 at $30.3; 1 at $29.91; 1 at $28.83; 1 at $28.5 (9/16/20 Post)Item # 1.M. Added to NBTB-Bought 1 at $27.03; 1 at $26.6 (10/17/20 Post) 

Last Earnings Report (12/30/20): This report was released after I eliminated the position. NBT Bancorp Inc. Announces Net Income of $104.4 Million for 2020 ($2.37 Per Diluted Common Share); Approves Dividend and Increase to Shares Available Under Share Repurchase Program 

Non-GAAP E.P.S. $.85 vs. consensus a$.69 according to Fidelity (GAAP at $.78 which includes "branch optimization charges for the quarter of $4.1 million.")

"net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent (“FTE”) basis for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 3.20%, up 3 basis points (“bps”) from the third quarter of 2020 and down 32 bps from the fourth quarter of 2019. 

loan to deposit ratio was 82.6% at December 31, 2020, compared to 94.0% at December 31, 2019 and 84.4% at September 30, 2020.

Nonperforming assets to total assets was 0.45%"

Total Capital Ratio: 15.62%

NPL Ratio: .68%

Charge Off Ratio: .22%

Coverage Ratio: 230.14%

ROA = 1.24%

ROE = 11.59%

ROTE = 15.71%

F. Pared FITB in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 16 at  $30.14 and 4 at $32.1 (highest cost lots): 



Quote: Fifth Third Bancorp

Closing Price 1/29/21: FITB $28.93 -$0.67 -2.26% 

FITB Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

FITB SEC Filings

Profit Snapshot: $43.89 


Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy

Average cost per share this account after pare: $18.87 

Snapshot Intraday on 1/19/21

Dividend: Quarterly at $.27 per share ($1.08 annually)

The last dividend raise was from $.24 to $.27 effective for the 2020 first quarter. 

FITB Dividend History | Nasdaq

Yield at AC = 5.72%

Last Ex Dividend: 12/30/20

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/30/2020):

GAAP E.P.S. $.78

Non-GAAP at $.88

Average Non-GAAP Estimate: $.69 


Adjustments to GAAP: 

FITB Realized Gains to Date: $1,004.72

G. Pared CATY in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 2 at $35.14

Quote:  Cathay General Bancorp (CATY)

Closing Price 1/29/21: CATY $33.82 -$1.52 -4.30% 

CATY Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

CATY SEC Filings

Cathay General Bancorp Key Metrics | Reuters

Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy

Profit Snapshot: +$21.07


Last Buy DiscussionItem # 1.M. Added to CATY- Bought 1 at $23.75; 1 at $21.38; 1 at $21.13(10/3/2020 Post)

Last Sell DiscussionItem #3.D. Sold 3 CATY at $27.1 -highest cost lot (12/5/2020) 

Average Cost per share after pare this account = $22.92

Snapshot Intraday 1/6/21 After Pare

Dividend: Quarterly at $.31 per share ($1.24 annually)

Yield at AC = 5.41%

Last Ex Dividend: 11/30/20

Last Earnings Report (Q/E  12/30/20): This report was released after my pare. Cathay General Bancorp Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results

2020 E.P.S. = $2.87 ($228.9M in net income)

4th Q E.P.S. = $.89 ($70.9 in net income)

Up from the $.84 earned in the 2019 4th quarter

Efficiency Ratio: 49.61% 

NIM: 3.12%

ROA = 1.5%

ROE = 11.75%

NPA Ratio: .38%

Coverage Ratio: 229.18%

Total Capital Ratio: 15.45%

"there was a reversal for loan losses of $5.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2020 and a $9.5 million decrease in nonaccrual loans during the fourth quarter."

CATY has not yet adopted CECL.  

More details: SEC Filing 

H. Pared BDGE in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 5 at $26.72


Quote: Bridge Bancorp Inc.  (BDGE)

Closing Price 1/29/21: BDGE $24.43 -$3.40 -12.22% That move may at least in part be arbitrage related. 

BDGE SEC Filings

Bridge Bancorp to Join S&P SmallCap 600 effective prior to the opening on 2/1/21 (2/25/21)

Profit Snapshot: $41.58


BDGE Realized Gains to Date: $2,616.47

Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy

Average Cost per share after pare this account: $17.7

Snapshot Intraday 1/6/21 After Pare

Dividend: Quarterly at $.24 per share, last raised from $.23 effective for the 2019 4th quarter payment

Bridge Bancorp, Inc. and Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. Announce Bridge Bancorp Fourth Quarter 2020 Dividend BDGE is expected to complete its acquisition of Dime Community on 2/1/21.  

Yield at $17.7 AC this account: 5.42%

Next Ex Dividend: 2/4/21 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/30/20): This report was released after my pare.  Bridge Bancorp, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Year End 2020 Results With Diluted Earnings Per Common Share of $0.45 (as Reported) and $0.75 (as Adjusted) 

Non-GAAP E.P.S. of $.75 excludes merger and stock acceleration expense, and related tax adjustments. Consensus estimate at $.72. 

NIM = 2.98% 

NPL Ratio: .26%

NPA Ratio: .19%

Coverage Ratio: 363.43%

Tangible Book Value per share = $20.69

"remaining loan payment deferrals at January 22, 2021 were $76.1 million, or 1.7%, of total loans held for investment" 

Loan-to-Deposit Ratio: .8375% 

Most Recent Sell DiscussionItem # 2.D. Pared BDGE-Sold 5 at $23.8-highest cost lot this account (12.25.20 Post) 

Sell Discussions-Largest Realized Gains

Item # 2.A. Sold 109+ BDGE at $35.53 (10/31/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $1,782.46); Item # 2.A. Sold 50 BDGE at $35.03 (4/23/17 Post)(profit snapshot= $376.06);  Item # 4 Pared BDGE Selling Highest Cost 56 Shares at $24.71 (12/10/13 Post)(profit snapshot = $200.65)

BDGE Realized Gains to Date: $2,617.7

I. Started OGE-Bought 5 at $32.15; 1 at $31.63; 4 at $31.31; 5 at $30.7; 5 at $30.31



 


Quote: OGE Energy Corp 

10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/20 

OGE is the parent company of Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company  and a holder of 25.5 percent limited partner interest and 50 percent general partner interest in Enable Midstream Partners LP

Enable Midstream Partners LP  (ENBL) 

Corporate Profile | OGE Energy Corp.

Investment Category: Bond Substitute

5 Year Historical


2019 Annual Report at page 39 

5 Year Chart

As of 1/22/21 

Average Cost Per Share: $31.13 (20 shares)

Dividend: Quarterly at $.4025 per share ($1.62 annually)

Yield at AC = 5.2%

Last Ex Dividend: 1/8/21

Last Earnings Report (9/30/20): SEC Filed Earnings Press Release 


OGE 10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/20 

GAAP earnings were negatively impacted by an impairment charge of $32.2M in OGE's investment in Enable; "less favorable weather in the quarter, compared to 2019 with cooling days decreasing approximately 21%"; and the pandemic. 

Maximum Position: 50 Shares

Purchase and Sell Restrictions and Guidelines: Small Ball Rules 

J. Pared TD-Sold 2 at $58.39 (part of highest cost lot):


Quotes: 

USD Price Shares: Toronto-Dominion Bank  (TD)

CAD Priced: Toronto-Dominion Bank  (Canada: Toronto)

Closing Price 1/29/21: TD $56.65 -$1.00 -1.73%

CAD/USD Currency Chart

I sold on the ex dividend date. 

TD Bank Group - Investor Relations 

TD Analyst Estimates

Credit Ratings

Investment Categories: Bond Substitute/Dividend Growth

Profit Snapshot: +$6.99

Average Cost this account after pare = $51.17 (40+ shares)

Snapshot Intraday 1/7/21 After Pare

Dividend: Quarterly at C$.79 per share (C$3.16 annually)

TD Bank Group Declares Dividends

Yield at AC: 4.61% (yield before taxes will depend on the CAD/USD exchange rate; the yield shown above is based on the last 4 USD actual payments of $2.36 per share which includes the 2021 first quarter payment)  

USD Dividends

Last Ex Dividend: 1/17/21

Last Buy DiscussionItem # 4 Bought 30 TD at $54.28 (4/10/19 Post) 

Recent Material NewsTD Bank Group Comments on Expected Impact of The Charles Schwab Corporation's Fourth Quarter EarningsTD confirms ownership stake in The Charles Schwab Corporation following completion of transaction (TD owns a 13.5% stake in Charles Schwab)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 10/31/20): The 10/31/20 date also marked the end of TD's fiscal reporting year. Q4 2020 EARNINGS NEWS RELEASE





Broker Reports (available to Schwab customers): 

Morningstar (12/9/20): 3 stars with a FV of US$61 

S & P (12/14/20): 3 stars with a 12 month PT of US$55 

K.  Pared TPVG-Sold 9 shares at $13.3


Those lots were bought with dividends. 

Quote: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 

Profit Snapshot: +$26.95

Last DiscussedItem # 2.L.  Pared TPVG in Vanguard Taxable Account-Sold 10 at $12.41 (8/22/20 Post) That pare reduced my average cost to $5.32 in this account. 

Last Substantive Buy DiscussionItem # 3.B. Added 5 TPVG at $11.1; 5 at $10.7; 5 at $8.2; 5 at $6.92; 2 at $5.35; 2 at $4.45; 2 at $4; 2 at $3.5; 2 at $2.99; 5 at $4.96   (4/11/2020)

Average Cost this Account after pare = $9.72 (59+ shares)

 
Using 1/22/21 Closing Price

Dividend: Regular, Quarterly at $.36 per share ($1.44 annually)

TPVG  Dividend History 

Yield at AC14.81%  (regular dividend only)

Last Special Dividend: $.10 per share paid 1/13/21

Last Earnings Report (9/30/20)SEC Filed Earnings Press Release 

NII per share = $.40

Book  Value Per Share = $13.28

"Recorded $4.9 million from the realization of gains from the sale of CrowdStrike, Inc. shares, with 16,747 shares still held as of September 30, 2020";

"Recorded $1.1 million from the realization of gains from the sale of Medallia, Inc. shares, with 18,616 shares still held as of September 30, 2020"

"Portfolio company exit and liquidity events subsequent to the third quarter include: Nestle USA announced that it acquired TPVG portfolio company, Freshly Inc.; TPVG portfolio company Hims, Inc. announced plans to go public through a merger with Oaktree Acquisition Corp.; and TPVG portfolio company Qubole, Inc. was acquired by Idera, Inc."

Net investment income per share does not include realized capital gains:




Credit quality per TPVG:


10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/20 (list of investments starts at page 5)

TPVG Realized Gains to Date: $851.14

Highest Cost Lot Remaining this account: 10 shares with an AC of $11.2 bought on 12/18/18

Lowest Cost Lot: 2 shares at $2.99 bought on 3/13/20.

This shows what can happen to a BDC during a stock market meltdown:  

TPVG Purchases 3/17/20 to 4/6/20-Snapshot as of 1/22/21

Sell DiscussionsItem # 2.L. Pared TPVG in Vanguard Taxable Account-Sold 10 at $12.6 (8/15/20 Post)(profit snapshot $9.99); Item # 1.J. Eliminated TPVG in Schwab Taxable Account-Sold 30 at $10.58 (8/8/20 Post)(profit snapshot = $94.3); Item # 2.A. Pared TPVG-Sold 14 shares at $15.61-Used Commission Free Trade (9/1/2019 Post)(profit = $46.33); Item # 2.A. Sold 74+ TPVG at $14.87 (7/20/19 Post)(profit snapshot= $246.43); Item # 4.C. Eliminated  TPVG in Roth IRA Account (4/17/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $88.87); Item # 3.B.(4/14/19 Post)(profit = $71.76); Item 3.A. Sold 40 TPVG at $13.44-Schwab Account and Item #3B Sold 50 TPVG at $13.39 Vanguard Roth  IRA (3/13/19 Post)(profit snapshots of $4.17 and $4.49 ); Item 2.B. Sold 50 TPVG at $13.39 (3/4/2017 Post)(profit snapshot = $153.08); Item # 3 Sold 50 TPVG at $12.33 (1/16/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $83.48)

L. Added to Kellogg-Bought 2 at $61; 1 at $60.5; 1 at $59.9; 1 at $59.4; 1 at $58.8; 1 at $58; 1 at $57.6:

I will continue these small ball buys provided the subsequent purchases are below the lowest price in the chain. 

Closing Price 1/29/21: K $58.94 -$1.23 -2.04% 

Kellogg Co. Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

SEC Filings

2019 Annual Report for the F/Y ending 12/28/19

Kellogg Company | Our Brand Portfolio

Last DiscussedItem # 3.D. Added to Kellogg-Bought 4 at $62.7; 2 at $62.44; 2 at $61.3 (12/19/20 Post) I discussed the last earnings report in that post and have nothing to add here. 

Dividend: Quarterly at $.57 per share ($2.28 annually)

Last Ex Dividend: 11/30/20

M. Pared FAX-Sold 103 at $4.46 (highest cost lots, including last remaining shares bought with dividends)


Quote: Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc. Overview - A Leveraged bond CEF

Fund Sponsor's Website: Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Fund, Inc.

FAX SEC Filings

FAX-CEF Connect Website 

Profit Snapshot: $106.84


New Average Cost Per Share: $2.98

Dividend:  Currently, monthly at$.0275

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Fund, Inc. Announces Payment Of Monthly Distribution (supported by ROC)

Yield at AC = 11.07%

Last Ex Dividend: 12/30/20 at $.0275 per share

Last Sell DiscussionsItem # 3.L. Pared FAX-Sold 12 Shares Bought with Dividends at $4.39  (1/1/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $6.26); Item # 1.E. Pared FAX-Sold 130 at $4.19 (12/12/20 Post)(profit snapshot $18.89)

N. Pared BK in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 1 at $45.43


Quote: Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

Closing Price 1/29/21: BK $39.85 -$0.53 -1.31% 

BK SEC Filings

BK Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy

Profit Snapshot: $9.33


Position after Pare: 5+ shares with AC at $34.75: 


Dividend: Quarterly at $.31 per share ($1.24 annually)


Yield at $34.75 AC = 3.57%

Last Ex Dividend: 10/27/20

Last DiscussedItem # 1.L. Added to BK-Bought 3 at $34.81 (10/3/20 Post);  Item # 1.G. (9/12/20 Post)  

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/30/20): BNY Mellon Reports Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings Of $702 Million Or $0.79 Per Common Share, Includes $0.18 Per Share Negative Impact Of Notable Items 

The Stock Jocks reacted negatively to BK's 4th quarter earnings report released on 1/20. (Closing Price 1/20: BK $42.49 -$3.33 -7.27%; Volume at 10.338+M vs. average at 5.141+M) I did not care for it either. 

GAAP E.P.S. = $.79

Non-GAAP E.P.S. = $.96, down from $1.01 in the 2019 4th quarter

Zack's had the consensus non-GAAP at $.93. BNY Mellon's (BK) Q4 Earnings, Revenues & Costs Decline Y/Y - January 20, 2021 - Zacks.com 

Fidelity had the estimate at $.96 for non-GAAP E.P.S. 

A major problem is fee waivers on BK's money market funds. "In 4Q20, the net impact of money market fee waivers was $134 million, up from $101 million in 3Q20, driven by low short-term interest rates." This problem will likely persist for an extended period given the Fed's Jihad Against the Savings Class. 

Assets under management "increased 15%, primarily reflecting higher market values, net inflows and the favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar (principally versus the British pound)."

Assets under administration increased 11% to $4.11 trillion "primarily reflecting higher market values and client inflows, the favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar and net new business."

Provision for credits losses was $15M. 

SEC Filed Financial Supplement for the 2020 4th quarter 

Purchase Restriction: Each subsequent purchase, other than through dividend reinvestment, must be at the lowest price in the chain.  

4. Intermediate Term Bond Ladder

A. Sold 1 Entergy Louisiana 2.4% First Mortgage Bond at 107.371 (IB Account)



FINRA Bond Detail

Prospectus

Profit Snapshot: $124.81


Item # 1 E. Bought 1 Entergy Louisiana 2.4% First Mortgage Bond (IB account) Maturing on 10/1/2026 at a Total Cost of 94.715 (2/21/17 Post) YTM was at 3.037% when I purchased this bond on 2/9/17. The YTM calculation assumes that the issuer will make all interest payments and pay the $1K per bond principal amount at maturity.  

I no longer have a position in this bond, having sold the 3 that I bought. 

I was paid $7.73 in accrued interest by the buyer. 

YTM at 107.371 = 1.01%

The profit was more appealing than holding a 2.4% coupon bond until maturity in 2026. 

My trade was the only one on 1/25/21.

Entergy Louisiana is a wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Corp. (ETR).

I decided to go with the common stock rather than to continue holding this bond. So far, I have only bought a 1 share placeholder position at $92.55, which I will discuss in my next post. Entergy's quarterly dividend is currently at $.95 per share. The dividend was raised from $.93 effective for the 2020 4th quarter payment. ETR Dividend History | Nasdaq At a $3.8 per share annual rate, the dividend yield at $92.55 is 4.11% which is likely to increase at my constant cost basis.    

3. Fidelity Taxable Account Bond Positions as of 1/29/21

The bond positions are in run off due to unacceptable yields for new investments. 











In this account, there have been an abnormal number of issuer optional redemptions, subject to make whole premium payments, since the FED accelerated its Jihad Against the Savings Class through reintroduction of ZIRP and QE, with QE restarted with no limits on amounts. 

Through optional redemptions and redemptions at maturity, this account lost close to 50% of its bond positions last year and so far this year, though a lesser percentage in the dollar amount. None of the Tennessee municipal bond positions were redeemed or sold last year. 

The result in a pile up in my cash allocation held in this taxable account that is currently at 45%. 

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sell of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and family members.

62 comments:

  1. The 40 year grooming doesn't surprise me. It surprises me that media didn't even guess much at this or produce info on it ages ago.

    Why he's seen as honest - because his expressiveness matches to his outputs. He emotes without shame or woodeness. So people think he's truthful. They use their emotional radar, not their rational brain.

    Also he uses techniques that stun the brain, so it can't finish processing. The repetition and alliteration. Long rambly sentences with no content or point. While your brain is busy with those, it's soaking in his love and approval of you. Or more accurately, his implication that he works hard through difficult sentences because he loves you and you're worth it. Never mind that the rational brain is soaking in gibberish.

    That book of Hitler's speeches by his bed is not accidental. He's learned sociopathic speaking skills from it.

    Abusers play with "connecting and disconnecting" to you. They superconnect, then disconnect and create a moment of fear and panic. Then they reconnect but with a threat of death if you don't follow them. When Trump threatened Hillary, he was grooming his crowd to be scared to leave him & his power of killing. Their brains perceive he has that power because he was violating normal behavior & not getting hauled away... so he must be incredibly super powerful. That's what their emotional brain concluded. So along with fear of death on leaving him, there's a power surge on staying.

    So powerless people such as economically, get suckered in on a deep brain/emotional level. Then they grab his self justifications. It makes it possible to be consistent with the emotionals and drives they are having to stay connected to him. Eventually they dig in deep to all the cognitive dissonance. The excuses are lies that build onto each other, creating a fake world for them to live in.

    Abusers create fake worlds. It's key to their activities. Including spouse and child abusers.

    Back to the original topic - other people who have any morality, feel guilt when they lie. They get more quiet with their body (wooden) or they push and one can feel something is off.

    Trump gets wooden when he says nice things. Cause that's when he's lying! So his followers know, he doesn't mean that stuff. He really does love them and agree with them - oddly agree with them agreeing with him as he taught them to do.

    Okay enough venting. Back to reading.

    There's a Mr. something Scott in PA that was also part of one of the problem actions recently? Along with Rick Perry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: Or it could just mean that the Trumpsters have more than few parts missing upstairs + they make either a conscious effort to avoid accurate information, sometimes referred to as willful ignorance or to dismiss facts that are inconsistent with their reality creations as part of a psychological protection mechanism. They were easily susceptible to believing fact free conspiracy theories and reality creations long before Donald ran for President.

      So they actually believe IMO what they are being told or at least the vast majority of the false information and lies. There are psychological reasons underpinning their beliefs, and unwillingness to change them no matter how bizarre they are or inconsistent with truthful information, but the psychological factors are more confirmation bias and an avoidance of having their comfort disturbed through challenges to deeply held beliefs.

      The explanations for believing bizarre conspiracy theories and other false information do not matter in the last analysis since they will not change; and rational fact based discussion with them is a total waste of time.

      They have to come to a self realization that they are being manipulated by people with ulterior motives (financial and power related) and are constantly being sold baseless conspiracy theories and demonstrably false narratives and information.

      As to Trump, I would not accept as true what a former KGB agent has to say about him, but I do have the same feeling as Dan Coats, the former republican senator from Indiana and Donalds Director of National Intelligence until replaced.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/15/woodward-book-former-intelligence-director-dan-coats-concluded-would-useless-speak-out-against-donal/5803115002/

      Trump's actions and words throughout his Presidency, including the period after the 2020 election, are consistent with what I would expect a Russian Manchurian Candidate would do. One overriding purpose for Russia is to cause serious discord in the U.S., unrelated to what naturally flows from policy differences, and to undermine Americans' faith in elections, government, and the press.

      ++

      "Jan. 6 Rally Funded by Trump Donor, Helped by Alex Jones"
      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jan-6-rally-funded-by-trump-donor-helped-by-alex-jones/ar-BB1deze7?li=BBnb7Kz

      The Trump Donor identified in the WSJ article is Julie Jenkins Fancelli, who donated $300K for the rally. Alex Jones and Donald are indistinguishable from one another IMO, or from Majorie Taylor Greene for that matter. Three peas from the same pod.

      There is no relation between congressman Scott Perry and Rick Perry.

      My most recent reference to Scott Perry was in connection with his refusal to wear a mask along with several other republicans, after they were removed to an enclosed room on 1/6/21.

      https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/10/perry-among-republicans-who-refused-wear-mask-during-capitol-siege/6615299002/

      An elderly democrat congresswomen in the room later came down with Covid.

      Delete
    2. I didn't know Rick Perry was involved in Trump-constitutional corruption until reading your post.

      I was thinking of this with Scott Perry. I caught it on a news pundit program (MSNBC or CNN who whatever came on after some sitcom I watched.)

      He colluded with Jeffrey Clark on the push to oust the Justice Dept & get it aligned with Trump's wishes.

      I stored the name because he ran and defeated George Scott. Scott was in both their names, and I campaigned for one (I'll let you guess which).

      So I happened to have a storage spot in my head for the name & noted when a story came on about him. And wished we'd worked harder and gotten him defeated. It was pretty close in a red area.

      https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/commentary/scott-perry-trump-insurrection-january-6-2021-20210127.html

      Delete
    3. I've said for a while that a big factor of who becomes a follower is gullibility.
      What you're describing is true. It's the on the ground reality.

      I'm describing how it gets that way.

      That trait and belief didn't start with Trump. They were duped or readily believed other stuff, and many were likely were manipulated and groomed before as well. Also Trump didn't start in 2015. He started with Birtherism & had many of these people riled up into hatefulness or non-reality long before he "decided" to run. (He likely decided 20 years ago when he first talked about it.)

      You raised the idea "Psychologists need to do more research on why that occurs."

      That tempted me to write some of what psychologists already have researched and know are how people get into the state where they believe crazy stuff and self-reinforce it with cognitive dissonance.

      From media you'd think we humans were clueless on how this happens. But there is study on cults and terrorist grooming for many years. Also studies on more benign looking but on the effectiveness of speech patterns.

      A factor that isn't mentioned much but a lot of these were raised with the idea that the earth is 6000 years old, macro evolution never happened, and the bible is literally 100% an accurate history document. If you are raised to dismiss facts, it's easy for someone else to tell you to.

      They are 100% responsible for their decisions. I'm not trying to argue that someone did it to them.

      But the move past bothersome into the levels we have now, included some purposefulness from beings like Trump et. al.

      For some people, where the crud has an effect, there are studied factors on why that is. How the crud gets past any basic normal filtering system.

      ----

      Good pt, a KGB agent is not an automatically accurate source of info.

      I've seen articles outlining contacts with Trump for 20 years & a shift in him as they started. Between that and the various former national security experts on news programs postulating it, it seems likely there's been something happening for years. The 40 years struck me as exaggeration.

      Coat's observations from inside should have a lot of weight. Trump's behaviors tend to make more sense if one thinks of a Russian goal to sell discord to the USA. It all fits together.


      Delete
    4. ""Alex Jones and Donald are indistinguishable from one another IMO, or from Majorie Taylor Greene for that matter. Three peas from the same pod.
      ""

      Yes, true. And scary as anything that our country elected Trump. Though I'm not convinced we did elect him.

      He's obvious, in all his dimensions of crazy, mean, criminal and manipulative. It should never have come close.

      Delete
    5. Land: The Philadelphia Inquirer story about Scott Perry (R-PA) goes into some of his sordid history.
      I noted earlier in a post that an ad he ran against his democrat opponent in 2020 Eugene DePasquale indicated to me that he lacked integrity.

      See # 3 "Relentless negative ads did their damage" in this article:
      https://www.pennlive.com/elections/2020/11/five-factors-in-us-rep-scott-perrys-win-in-pas-10th-congressional-district-over-auditor-general-eugene-depasquale.html

      Perry won 53.3% to 46.7%.

      DePasquale had been Pennsylvania’s auditor general and a former state representative.

      While Perry falsely insinuated that DePasquale was dirty, it was Perry who had plead guilty to making false statements in an environmental report.

      Delete
    6. I remember the win as being 2-3%. Which isn't really that small, but the talk was about it being close & if we could have done a little more.

      This article has 51.4 to 48.6% which is like I remember.

      Maybe there was adjustments after during mail in or something. I didn't pay attention after my effort was done.

      https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/news/politics/elections/2018/11/07/rep-scott-perry-edges-out-george-scott-10th-district-race/1910029002/

      Scott Perry seems like a real charmer in the morality category.

      The most heartening aspect was when at least 3 times a GOP voter pulled me into their house to tell me they were voting DNC for the 1st time.

      Rick Perry, Scott Perry, George Scott. With how I mix up similar sounds, I'm surprised I kept any of these straight.

      Delete
  2. Mr. Lolos is incredibly dumb. It's like when a bank robber wrote the stickup note on the back of his utility bill with his name and address.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I believe Trump had a hand in starting Qanon. No evidence. But it was coincidental timing, totally wacky, with him as rescuer, useful elements to him... like he's the good guy against pedophilia (he may know that charge is coming up fairly soon).

    So that's my conspiracy theory about that conspiracy theory.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Looking at FG's he has optimism about the economy. Qualifies a difference between whether stimulus comes as shotgun or specific (I don't).

    But a couple of comments:

    1)
    On the vaccine news being good, "However, while this news is surely great for humanity, it won't take the market higher. The equity market already figured that out late last year"

    2)
    "When I look at the present backdrop for equities there are many more PROS than CONS today, and many of the CONS revolve around ONE theme, SENTIMENT. It is the investor exuberance being seen in specific areas of the market today that keep popping up as a negative. The other issues the market faces are all well within the scope of what is easily "worked out" assuming the recovery is not met with a policy error. When we look at "Jobs" and "Vaccine" as potential problems, if handled correctly, they can easily become potential tailwinds."

    **** So along with watching for policy error, he's starting to notice exuberance too. That's a 1st.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: There are several positive longer term forces underpinning the stock market with the pandemic now being the primary disruptive factor.

      (1) low inflation now and predicted for years to come as reflected in the breakeven spreads to 5, 10, 20 and 30 year Tips.

      (2) abnormally low interest rates now and projected as continuing well into the future which renders fixed coupon investments unattractive and supports theoretically higher multiples for stocks;

      (3) the massive refinancing of mortgage obligations at historically low rates which increases disposable income after debt service payments that can be spent, saved and/or used to pay down debt (all positive when sourced from extra DI

      The main negative factor, which had been dismissed as temporary by the Stock Jocks, is the pandemic. I would agree with FG that positive vaccine developments have been factored into market index levels, but the certainty factor is IMO 100% that the pandemic will be in the rear view mirror soon.

      If that proves to be an erroneous prediction, which is certainly possible, then there will be a serious contraction in stock prices depending on how far off the rosy forecast proves to be.

      So far the market is also receiving a boost from widespread better than expected 4h quarter earnings.

      The regional bank stocks that I own are reporting meaningfully higher E.P.S. in the 2020 4th quarter compared to the pre-pandemic 2019 4th quarter.

      I would also agree with some comments made by the manager of the T.Rowe Capital Appreciation fund, David Giroux, a fund that I own.

      https://www.cnbc.com/video/2021/01/25/t-rowe-prices-david-giroux-on-whether-he-sees-more-value-in-us-or-global-stocks.html

      The main difference between now and 1999 is not so much the market's P/E which was higher in 1999 but the relative concentration of exuberantly priced stocks now compared to 1999 when most stocks were overpriced.

      There are more reasonably price stocks now. I gave up looking in 1999 and went to a zero stock allocation.

      As to policy errors, federal government spending of a trillion dollars per year of borrowed money when the economy is growing will turn out to be a catastrophic policy error.

      It would be a bad idea to increase corporate taxes this year.

      The policy focus this year needs to be, first and foremost, massive federal support for vaccinations, which Biden is trying to do. Trump never had a plan other than to let state and local governments figure it out.

      I would mind seeing another stimulus payment being conditioned on proof of vaccination but the democrats will never do that.

      Increasing the minimum wage to $15 this year is probably a bad idea too. There will initially be job losses from that raise. What the republicans, who are opposed to any raise, fail to realize is that more disposable income among low wage earners will be spent, adding to aggregate demand and corporate profits over time that will lead to more hiring in the aggregate, not less.

      One of the most stimulative actions that the federal government can take is to deliver (stimulus checks, more unemployment insurance, etc), or cause to be delivered (increase in minimum wage), more money to lower income workers.

      Delete
    2. All of that makes sense.

      Those are good policy issues to keep an eye out for. I hadn't thought about raising the rate to $15 as causing job loss initially.

      It had been looking like the stock jocks were right about the end of the pandemic. It is no longer certain. As of only the last few weeks or month.

      There are some odd factors on the economy. AFter the pandemic is over, some people will have saved up during it by not going out or on vacations and so on. On the other hand, many people will react by saving when they finally can. And others are harmed. All the usual models won't fit exactly as they have in the past.

      Stimulus can't be predicated on the vaccine because access to it isn't based solely on one's motivation. Other than that it'd be a great idea!

      Same as no medical care if you refused to wear a mask. Or two. Or 3.


      Delete
  5. I added in Item 3.M. my new average cost and yield numbers for the leveraged bond CEF FAX.

    AC now at $2.98
    Yield at 11.07% with significant ROC support.

    The general idea with return of capital (ROC) supported dividend payments like this one is to generate a total return in excess of the dividend payments based on an unadjusted tax cost basis.

    The 100 FAX share lot sold was bought at $3.43 (4/20) and sold at $4.46 as noted above. So the goal was achieved.

    When I sold this lot on 1/8, the tax cost basis had not yet been reduced for the ROC component paid in 2020. So the actual taxable profit will be higher than the amount shown in the post.

    Fidelity has now adjusted the tax cost basis for the ROC paid as part of the 2020 dividends. The profit increased to $122.05 from the $106.84 snapshot shown in this post.

    The taxable cost basis of the 100 share lot was reduced to $3.281 from $3.43.

    +++

    Giuliani is continuing to do whatever he can to destroy his reputation and to generate defamation suits filed against him.

    He accused the Lincoln Project of planing the Trumpster riot at the capitol in order to hurt Donald.

    He will be sued for those comments.

    https://www.thewrap.com/lincoln-project-demands-rudy-giuliani-apologize-helping-capitol-rioters/

    +++

    Donald has fired all or almost all of the lawyers recently hired to defend him in the impeachment proceeding.

    "A person familiar with the departures told CNN that Trump wanted the attorneys to argue there was mass election fraud and that the election was stolen from him rather than focus on the legality of convicting a president after he's left office."

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/30/politics/butch-bowers-deborah-barbier-trump-impeachment-team/index.html

    Giuliani is begging his client to hire him for the job.

    ++

    I did have a brain malfunction when typing Scott Perry's name in the blog. I originally typed "Rick Perry" and have corrected that error.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I was just reading a twitter thread where Politico's headline is that Biden is shunning the spotlight. The replies are that he's acting normal and and simply not whirlwinding crazy.

    I think there was a rick perry in the news recently in PA as secretary of energy.

    As our brains adjust to the new normal, that is actual normal, there'll likely be less brain malfunctions all the way around. I'm trying to find a large red and yellow can of Spot Shot I bought and put away a month ago. How do you lose a large bright red and yellow can??? I finally bought another one yesterday before this stain sets.

    First we have to live through next week when the trial circus begins. Beyond the official news, some are theorizing that since Trump has the votes to not be found guilty, he's not bothering with attorneys.

    Now our donations to Lincoln Project are going to sue Giuliani. I hope the goal and point of it, is the discovery, not a suit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: The Rick Perry on my brain was Donald's Secretary of Energy who resigned:

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/rick-perry-resigns-energy-secretary-ukraine

      I receive an email when a limit order is filled. One of the brain malfunctions that occur regularly now is that I ask why a broker sends me an email after hearing a notification sound on my Iphone. Then I look and say, yep I did place an order to buy that one.

      Delete
  7. I think VZ is a good covered yield(4.5%+) what lower price ($53 or lower) would you consider?
    GRX is a fund that has food companies, like ConAgra, Nestle, which have pricing power... where would you consider buying (near 5% yield)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VZ recently crashed below its 200 day SMA line.

      Investors are concerned about the prices that VZ and others had to pay in the recent C band spectrum auction. That is the elephant in the china closet for those companies.

      https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/31/5g-spectrum-auction-bids-total-80point9-billion-winners-revealed-soon.html

      I own a few shares of AT & T as a bond substitute. I do view that stock with favor. My AC is near the current price.

      I also own Shaw Communications (SJR) which operates in Canada.

      I am not looking to add another wireless carrier. High labor costs and enormous capital expenditures for the U.S. companies do not make them a good total return vehicle IMO.

      VZ has a support level near $45 looking at a 5 year chart. I would need a price near there to own both VZ and AT & T.

      S & P has a 12 month PT for VZ at $50 with a 2 star rating. Morningstar is at $57 Fair Value estimate and a 3 star rating.

      I have never owned the Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (GRX).

      I looked at the portfolio and am fine with most of the holdings.


      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1391437/000119312520239891/d97792dncsrs.htm

      Generally, I would look for a discount to net asset value per share higher than the 1 and 3 year averages as an entry point.

      The closing discount last Friday was at -13.73 compared to a 1 year average at -15.2 and 3 years at -14.38%.

      Click Pricing Information Tab
      https://www.cefconnect.com/fund/GRX

      That is not enough of a difference to keep me from starting a nominal position. My concern now is more about buying just about anything after the robust move off the March 2020 lows.

      So buying GRX for me now means something like a 10 share starter position and then waiting to see how much of a better can be had with subsequent purchases as I endeavor to mitigate risk which I view as elevated. If I miss out on more upside, that is fine with me when I make a judgment on the risk/reward balance given my capital preservation objective.

      I look at potential downside numbers when thinking about an add. GRX closed at $8.56 on 3/23/20.

      I do not view market meltdowns starting in the late 1990s as aberrations or one off events unlikely to recur.

      Given their regularity and causes which persist, it would not be rational to conclude that this time is different and mankind has finally found a perpetual money machine that will not break down again or explode in our faces.

      The stock market has become more unstable since the late 1990s for a variety of reasons IMO, so I am in the habit of looking down for potholes before admiring the blue sky.

      I do not think that the cure for the 2008 Near Depression, caused in good measure by too much debt, will prove to be spending new debt of about $80 trillion worldwide over the past 13 years.

      The next debt bomb explosion will just be far worse than the last one.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for your reply, I hope you read Matt Taibbi on ZeroHedge- his writing style and facts are like yours. His " Suck It, Wall St" is one of his best, and documented links.

      Delete
  8. Sold back out of TXN at 170.17. I'm missing the top, but did lock in the profit from my original buy and recent round trip. Still have 11 shares to add to when there's a better down trip.

    GRMNs not back up to my last re-buy point. It was a slower climber last time too.

    Sold SPY at 269.85 for a few dollars on a 3 share trade bought Friday.

    Keeping IWM bought in that trade.

    I expect another leg down in the next few days and chance to buy a little.

    Also a recovery - which is when I'll sell my VZ. I hadn't noticed the crash below 200, only that it'd been sinking a bit. Lost that profit but gained 4-5% while I held it. Will buy back lower.

    Definitely missed the top on TXN, it's at 170.46 now.

    For a bull market, so many of my stocks are having trouble keeping up. MMM, LMT, LAZ, VZ for starters.

    Either I pick poorly (very possible).

    I should be more aware and selling sooner, but usually they decline off bad news and it's too late. (I'm sure some of it is this - I didn't have on my list to act when it's price starts to look weak, even if I don't seen news yet.)

    Or this bull is struggling in spite of valuations in the hot areas even for big well known companies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: VZ is in what I call a choppy channel range. Looking at a 5 year chart, the chop was mostly up and down in a $45 to $54 range (between 2/16 to 8/18).
      The chop channel then moved higher, mostly between $54 to $62. The stock may find some support near $54 and then bounce back up to the top end.

      If I owned it and was looking for a trade, I would monitor for the post 8/18 channel trade to reassert (best case scenario), with a bounce coming off $53-54 and then up some, possibly to $57 or closer to the top. A better entry point would be closer to the 5 year support line near $45.

      The trading problem with T and VZ is that it is difficult to earn a total return in excess of the dividend yield. I would focus on the channels for VZ if I was going to trade it, which I have no intention of doing now.

      Delete
  9. And PFE. I sold it already. But if I hadn't, it's weak too.

    ReplyDelete
  10. FYI, Bridge completed its acquisition of Dime Community today.

    https://www.globenewswire.com/fr/news-release/2021/02/01/2167267/0/en/Bridge-Bancorp-Inc-and-Dime-Community-Bancshares-Inc-Close-Merger-of-Equals.html

    Bridge is the surviving company but it has taken the name of Dime Community Bancshares.
    The new symbol is the old symbol for Dime which is DCOM.

    My common stock position in Bridge disappeared this morning and has reappeared with a new CUSIP number only. The new symbol will be added later probably overnight.

    I also own the old Dime Community 5.5% equity preferred stock. That symbol did not change and remains DCOMP since Bridge took the name of Dime after completing the acquisition. Still that one disappeared earlier today as well and reappeared only with a new CUSIP number.

    ReplyDelete
  11. OFS Capital Corp. (OFS)
    $7.35 $0.43 +6.21%
    Last Updated: Feb 1, 2021 2:11 p.m. EST
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ofs?mod=over_search

    OFS is a mini cap BDC with about a $93M market capitalization that I play for entertainment.

    The pop today is due to this news release:

    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210201005588/en/

    The release provides preliminary information about the 4th quarter results.

    "Net asset value per share was estimated to be between $11.75 and $11.85 per common share at December 31, 2020. This compares to a net asset value per common share of $11.18 at September 30, 2020."

    "Net investment income was estimated to be between $0.21 and $0.23 per common share for the quarter ended December 31, 2020. This compares to net investment income of $0.20 per common share for the quarter ended September 30, 2020."

    And, there were no new loans put on non-accrual.

    OFS has several exchange traded baby bonds that are rising in price in response.

    My last buys were near the $4 area.

    Item 3.F.Multiple Buys-40 Shares Total at $4.18 AC in Vanguard Taxable Account
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2020/11/ajx-arow-bif-disca-ebgef-fraf-gdo-kmi.html

    Judging from the discount to that 12/31/20 net asset value per share, investors do not put a lot of faith in that number. Another explanation is the BDC is so small that it flies under most investors radar.

    I am not exactly brimming with optimism but I did buy 10 shares this morning at $7.35 in my Fidelity taxable account

    ReplyDelete
  12. Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
    54.28-0.47 (-0.86%)
    Volume 18,357,279
    Avg. Volume 16,930,418

    On a good up day for the market, VZ peaked briefly into the green around 2:24 E.S.T, and then proceeded to decline persistently into the close. Volume was heavier than normal as it has been on the down days since the stock closed at $58.42 on 1/25/21:

    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VZ/history?p=VZ

    VZ reported earnings before the market opened on 1/26 so the drift down is most likely in response to that earnings report that has triggered institutional selling.

    I do not see any indication yet that the stock is about to pull out of this downtrend. The institutions who want to sell need to finish first or institutions sitting on the sideline need to start buying more aggressively or some combination. I personally have no interest at $54.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Below 200dma can be a sign of trouble. Or it can recover. But with the market over all doing well when it went below, it reflects worried investors. Points to getting out.

      The market's in a dip.

      Thinking... If it's not a top then if I wait until the dip is over, even if there's steady selling, it's likely to overall recover some...

      If it's a top I'll regret being in VZ, but I have otehr $ to buy when down.

      Delete
    2. Land: If I owned VZ, I would not be selling now but I would not be hanging around too long after a return back to $58.

      I am having enough trouble earning a total return in excess of AT & T's dividend payments. The T yield is about 2% higher than VZ. I will sell pops on the T shares but have not had an opportunity to do so recently. My last buy was at $26.77 and the highest cost lot, which will be sold next, was bought at $30.17 (10 shares)

      I am not so much down on VZ as seeing a tough road to navigate just to secure an annualized 7.5% total return. The entry point has to be decent, meaning lower for me, in order to have a better chance of just hitting that modest mark.

      I may test my feel for a VZ trade where I try to harvest at least 1 dividend and $4 dollars a share on the stock within 6 months. Just to see whether I can do it.

      Delete
    3. I don't own that much. So if it does oversell, I can afford to buy some for a bounce.

      Under 200dma is an odd move. It really does shout weakness. The decline started mid=Dec during a rally. Maybe someone anticipated.




      Delete
    4. Land: The move below the 200 day SMA line, using a 1 year chart, was on high volume, which I would describe as a strong short term price signal. So I would just treat the decline now as a falling knife until an equilibrium point is reached between those who want out and those who see a good entry point. The sellers are controlling the price now.

      Both T and VZ started to decline in early December. I do not attribute that decline now to concerns about 4th quarter earnings reports but the amount of money being spent on the latest spectrum auction which was leaking out around that time.

      Delete
    5. I did buy 5 shares of VZ yesterday. I will not be discussing the trade in the blog, which is just a test of a trading thesis relating to price and volume trends.

      The key data point for buying yesterday was that the shares gained in price with the volume falling well below the average, possibly indicating the sellers had exhausted themselves which is the thesis being tested.

      Price and Volume History
      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VZ/history?p=VZ

      With a stock like VZ, I view an annualized total return of 7.5% as a victory so expectations are low going into the trade.

      Delete
  13. I bought it for the div without expecting too much growth. But a loss with eat into that div.

    For growth apparently I need to buy over priced tech stocks.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Pfizer Inc. (PFE)
    $34.67 -$1.12 -3.14%
    Last Updated: Feb 2, 2021 at 10:17 a.m. EST
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/pfe?mod=over_search

    PFE missed the consensus earnings estimate:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/pfizer-stock-slips-after-profit-misses-expectations-while-revenue-beats-2021-02-02?mod=mw_quote_news

    GAAP at $.10
    Non-GAAP at $.42
    Non-GAAP 2021 E.P.S.Guidance = $3.10 to $3.2

    I am not a fan for a variety of reasons which I have previously discussed here.

    I did notice today that Pfizer's key drug Xeljanz failed a post-approval safety study for
    rheumatoid arthritis.

    https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-s-xeljanz-hits-competitive-hurdle-race-against-abbvie-s-rinvoq-failure-safety-study

    Safety compared unfavorably with ABBV's
    Humira. And ABBV has a new drug Rinvoq approved to treat RA.

    I added 1 to ABBV this morning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Checked, I have 4 PFE left. I thought I had 1.

      Delete
    2. Land: I bought 1 PFE today at $34.5 so that I can monitor its price movements better.

      Delete
    3. Land: In case you are wondering when you read this comment, the !!! points below are not for you but in response to an extremely obnoxious comment from a reader, who has a habit of sending me such comments, deleted by me of course, who apparently is unable to understand the meaning of a 1 share PFE buy so "I can monitor its price movements".

      The 1!!! share PFE buy was not based on fundamentals but was for the purpose of tracking price movements and news.


      I am more likely to see news that may be relevant to other positions as I have said many times here. There was a delay of several days before I noticed that Pfizer's Xeljanz failed a safety trial which is relevant to my position in ABBV where I am more constructive on the fundamentals. So buying 1!!! share was primarily in response to my failure to see that news earlier.

      And, I have said many times in comments that PFE is going to cut its dividend due to its VTRS spin off.

      Delete
    4. Well I can't see the obnoxiousness, but you've been buying 1 shares for a while.

      I find even on my watch list, it doesn't activate my brain the same way the positions list does to notice and remember the info.

      However, I get confused by lists with lots of shares. So I've bought small lots only when I plan to buy more soon.

      Every single one of them - rose before I bought more. So when I'm that enamored, I should just jump in with 1/2 or whole position amount.

      That said I will take !!!'s in context of someone else's posts.

      Delete
    5. Land: I have not had anything nice to say about Pfizer in over 20 years. I lump it together with AT & T and IBM. The heyday for PFE was in the 1982-2000 long term secular bull market. It has been a loser IMO since it started to grow through overpriced acquisitions that started in 2000s.

      The PFE annual average total return (dividends reinvested) from 2/2/2000 through 2/1/21 is +3.75%. The start price was at $34.16, near the close today 21 years later, with no stock splits since 2/2/2000. The return, such as it is, came from the dividends.

      And "extraordinary" charges occur fairly regularly with PFE, creating huge gaps between GAAP and Non-GAAP E.P.S., as in the last quarter. When that happens frequently, I am not convinced why I should ignore those charges and rely instead on the significantly higher non-GAAP numbers relied upon by the Stock Jocks.

      I will occasionally move in and out of PFE as a trade + dividend harvesting and have been successful doing that.

      Possibly if the price cracks below $30 after the dividend cut, I may buy 50 shares since that kind of price drop wrings out some of the downside risk.

      Verizon may be better than AT & T which is not saying much in my book.

      AT & T is worse primarily because it has incinerated massive amounts of shareholder money through its Direct TV acquisition but that is already in the stock price.
      Both T and VZ face major longer term headwinds in multiyear massive capital spending programs. The recent spectrum auction was just a license to use airways.

      https://www.rcrwireless.com/20210111/spectrum/auction-slows-as-it-surpasses-80-billion

      ERIC is a company that is benefiting so far from the 5G rollout.

      "Ericsson posts earnings beat amid 5G spending"

      "reported fourth-quarter net profit attributable to shareholders of 7.52 billion Swedish kronor ($900 million) compared with SEK4.43 billion in the year-earlier period."
      https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ericsson-posts-earnings-beat-amid-5g-spending-2021-01-29

      I own a few shares. Another possible better way to play the 5G rollout, rather than trying to pick the individual stock winners, is through the ETF FIVG which I have discussed here and currently own in several accounts, though the purchases were all at much lower prices.

      Defiance Next Gen Connectivity ETF
      $35.80 +$0.07 +0.20%
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/fivg?mod=over_search


      Sponsor's website:
      https://www.defianceetfs.com/FIVG

      Delete
    6. Some interesting ideas for 5G.

      ABBV's pipeline looks interesting too. On PFE I'll wait until after the div, but it's chart long term isn't appealing. You've added the reasons which I didn't know about...



      Delete
  15. Yesterday may have been the beginning of the end to the retail army's short squeeze.

    The poster child was Gamestop (GME) which is currently trading $ 102.65 -$122.35 (-54.38%)
    As of 11:12AM EST. The close on 1/29 was at $325.

    Other beneficiaries of the retail army's short squeeze are tanking as well.

    I mentioned in this blog's market section eliminating SKT and DISCA that benefited from the widespread short squeezes. Of the stocks impacted by what was happening, I kept only 4 shares of EBIX (A LOTTERY TICKET) and 15 shares of AMCX which I view more favorably longer term.

    Ebix, Inc. (EBIX)
    46.88-6.67 (-12.46%)
    As of 11:16AM EST


    AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX)
    47.53-4.13 (-8.00%)
    As of 11:18AM EST.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AMCX/history?p=AMCX

    I decided to go ahead and test my thesis on VZ by placing a limit order to buy 5 shares. I do not care whether it fills. The thesis is that support may materialize around $54, as noted above in a comment, following by about a 4 point rise to $58 where the rally would stall. The thesis was based on looking at a 1 year chart and seeing the volume on yesterday's down day fall from recent elevated activity (or, some semblance of what I call an establishment of an equilibrium point between buyers and sellers)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The method depended on the secrecy. It will keep trying to pop up. But big money won't be scared and will wait them out or sell strategically to scare buyers out of the squeeze. Fun while it lasted.

      It was pointed out on CNBC that retail manipulation wasn't new and had happened 2 years ago or more, a few times.

      Not sure. If it's new to be this aggressive, it looks like signs of end of exuberance phase with all the risk on excitement and corruption that goes with it.

      Delete
    2. Land: My 5 share order for VZ did not fill today. I did not like the price action in that one today. I may try again tomorrow just to test my trading thesis outlined above.

      $54.50 +$0.22 (+0.41%)
      Day's Range 54.17 - 55.17

      After hitting its intraday near noon E.S.T the stock started to fade. The downtrend accelerated some into close with volume spiking. You can see that on a YF 1 day chart.

      Delete
    3. I hope it's a good thesis. I'm still waiting to sell out.

      I noticed that fade. I've never figured out how to look at volume. I suppose step one might be to put volume chart below my regular chart.

      Delete
    4. Land: I look at volume and historical price data at Yahoo Finance, just click the "historical data" tab.

      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VZ/history?p=VZ

      I use the volume trends in relation to the average volume which can be found on the summary page.

      For potential entry I look generally at a 2 or 5 year chart, or both. The 2 year VZ chart shows $54 at or near support several times where a waterfall type decline was stopped followed by a price rally. The VZ stock price did briefly dip below $54 in March but then SPX was in disaster mode then and again in June.

      If I buy VZ, it is more of a chart buy than anything else. I will do several of these kind of buys, which are not discussed here, to test a trading strategy with real money, even though the amounts are not significant.

      I was not impressed with AMGN's earnings released after the close. Barely okay is my reaction. I view the price currently as too high for anything other than a monitor price buy. I view the company far more favorably than Pfizer but want a better price to better balance the potential risk/reward.

      Amgen Inc. (AMGN)
      $236.94 -3.55 (-1.48%)
      After hours: 6:59PM EST
      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AMGN?p=AMGN&.tsrc=fin-srch

      Delete
    5. I don't regret my PFE sell. Though I still have 4.

      Sold my 5 VTRS at 18.15. My guess is 18.60 is coming again. So I missed $2.25, another 2.5% climb.

      Divs are coming but this is going to slide back down again before then. Besides it wasn't a choice to own and I"m not sure I want it long term.

      Delete
    6. I'll have to experiment with looking at volume!!

      My impression of Amgen is excellent management, very good stock, but it's run up beyond it's pipeline vs risk value. That's not an in depth assessment. But back at $144 I investigated. $237 isn't a "crazy" rise from there, but it's a fully enthusiastic rise. As in likely all the positives are fully priced in.

      Delete
    7. Land: VTRS was recently recommended by one of the Barron's Roundtable members, Meryl Witmer: "We expect Viatris to have adjusted earnings this year of $3.50 to $4 a share, and pay a dividend equal to 25% of its trough after-tax free cash flow."

      I don't like generic drug companies but am looking under every rock for yield now so I bought 8 shares as a Lotto with an AC of $17.28. I have a vague memory of buying more in another account. Most of recent trading is in a blur state.

      I do not know why the stock is rising today:

      Viatris Inc.
      $18.26 +$0.87 +5.03%
      Last Updated: Feb 3, 2021 at 2:11 p.m. EST
      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/vtrs?mod=over_search

      Delete
    8. For a change my broker news had useful info.

      It's raising because the merger deal was approved (adjust that for proper wording of the deal.) That news will wear off.

      I saw that advisor buy (or maybe she's not an advisor). But I don't take those seriously by themselves. Though that person and comments do impress, makes me want to take a look.

      If the div announcement is soon then I miss out. Otherwise, the stock's been going up and down. And this was closer to the up.

      For me it was a lotto win ($93 more out of PFE without doing anything), and I want out before I lose that. But I'll look at it at some point to see if I want it long term.

      Delete
    9. Land: I was more interest in the factual comment about how much VTRS would likely pay out in a dividend rather than her buy recommendation.

      You may be referring to FTC approving the Mylan and Upjohn merger with conditions but that news was from 1/28/21.

      https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2021/01/ftc-approves-final-order-imposing-conditions-combination-pfizer

      The most recent analyst action that I have seen is from Raymond James who kept the stock as a buy while reducing its PT from $27 to $23.

      As to PFE, my negativity is set out in prior posts going way back.

      One key factor for me is that that PFE has paid more for acquisitions starting with Warner Lambert in 2000, which was at least a positive contributor, than PFE's market cap prior to VTRS spinoff. One result is a share price equal to where it was 21 years ago.

      Delete
    10. Yes, the div comments are what's intriguing there.

      I take it back. My broker's news wasn't helpful at explaining today, since that was from last week.

      I don't know. It may be a very good buy.

      Delete
  16. It looks like the end to this dip. It's broken upward with a 2nd big day. That's usually the end. Plus it's higher than it usually goes in a pause before more decline. This is that place to chase that I can't bring myself to do.

    I'm surprised. I expected big money to let it continue a little farther.

    Covid team is now selling the J&J vaccine because it stops deaths and serious disease. Original worries were it's lower efficacy and spread of new strains. Also that JJ was tests later during worse spread so the testing wasn't equal & it may be as good as the other two. This market change is from the "jawboning."

    Personally I want whatever will stop my getting it altogether. We don't know covid's long term effects even if a light case was had. Especially with my medical conditions, it's well worth avoiding.

    ... maybe someone will be bothered by the end to this dip, and talk it up again....

    ReplyDelete
  17. VIX back to 26.

    DIS, and banks are flying again.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Land: The banks are probably benefiting from a rise in interest rates which is a Pavlovian response among investors. The rise in the market also creates a vibe that the blue sky scenario is alive and well, which benefits the banks. Valuations for many of them are still reasonable.

    New infections have been falling which helps the mood. The NYT says the infections yesterday were at 139,830, down 29% from the 14 day average with deaths at 2,010. I would not be surprised however by a new surge later this month or in March due to the more contagious variants gaining more of a foothold.

    I read an article this morning about the Brazil variant infecting people who had been previously infected with a prior version of Covid. It was believed also that the impacted population in an area known as Manaus had reached herd immunity:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/02/coronavirus-pandemic-brazil-variant/617891/

    I will take whatever vaccine is available but will continue wearing a mask thereafter until it is clear that the pandemic is gone. There is no chance here in Tennessee that I will be able to receive any vaccine shot, even at my age, this month. I may not even bother to try next month.

    I neglected to mention in my prior comment that I had another stock impacted by the short squeeze frenzy-IRM, which I did pare but did not eliminate. I would have eliminated my position at over $40 if I could have gained access to my Fidelity account earlier.

    Iron Mountain Inc.
    $32.18 -$1.20 -3.59%
    Last Updated: Feb 2, 2021 at 12:18 p.m. EST

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reinfection? That is not good at all.

      It could mean the vaccines won't be effective.

      Maybe we'll stop the transmission before these strains get here in significant ways.

      I'm not eligible to be vaccinated either. Won't be for 2 more stages or a and b of a stage. (Why can't they number them sequentially?) Then again, I don't think there's many doses to go around anyway. Lots of places to get the vaccine though, when it finally arrives!

      My plan is to wear masks and stay home until spread is way down. Vaccine isn't a factor.

      Delete
  19. AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)
    $106.04 +$2.57 (+2.48%)
    As of 1:34PM EST.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ABBV?p=ABBV
    I mentioned this one in a comment published yesterday.

    The company released results earlier today that slightly beat the consensus estimate.

    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1551152/000155115221000003/abbv-20201231xexhibit991.htm

    As noted earlier, investors are concerned about the U.S. patent expiration for Humira and the share price trends will be heavily influenced by revenues from newer drugs.

    IMO, the pop today is not based on the slight beat to consensus non-GAAP E.P.S. but to the revenues generated by the new drugs and Abbvie's projections for future growth.

    Those newer drugs are Skyrizi ($525M), Rinvoq ($281M); Vraylar ($401M), Venclexta ($365M), and the cancer drug Imbruvica ($1.4B). Cosmetic Botox sales rose 9% Y-O-Y.

    In the conference call, the CEO made this comment: "We expect to combine contribution from Rinvoq and Skyrizi to nearly double in 2021 to approximately $4.6 billion based on their continued strong uptake in RA and psoriasis as well as Rinvoq’s anticipated approvals in PSA, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis later this year." I thought that was important.

    Barron's published an article about the results. For non-subscribers, Fidelity has the article in its news feed, through the Dow Jones news service, which is frequently the case for Barron's article about individual stocks

    ReplyDelete
  20. Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. (AKBA)
    $3.9400 +$0.4400 (+12.57%)
    Volume 9,497,207
    Avg. Volume 5,819,540


    After hours: $4.13 +0.19 +4.82%
    After Hours Volume: 463.6K
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/akba

    AKBA is one of my Lottos and was discussed in this blog:

    Item 2.I. Restarted AKBA-Bought 10 at $3.18; 5 at $3; 5 at 2.9:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2020/12/akba-aresf-bdge-brgpra-brkl-ccne-csco.html

    I later added 5 at $2.8:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2021/01/akba-at-cc-cet-bmy-dpg-eaf-fcbp-gam.html

    Another 15 shares or so were added and not discussed.

    I can not explain the recent price rise except for guesses.

    The stock could be caught up the short squeeze craziness. YF has the short interest as a percent of the float at 22.93% as of 1/15/21. That has changed but I do not know in what direction.

    There was a news story that indicated that AKBA's key drug vadadustat was going to be studied in Covid patients. The University of Texas received DOD funds to expand a Phase 2 trial:

    That is old news from 1/12/21 though:
    https://www.uth.edu/news/story.htm?id=2c7f7445-3390-4be1-a205-9297ce9dced7

    Volume has trended higher since that announcement:

    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AKBA/history?p=AKBA

    Another one of my LOTTOs, RIGL, is receiving buying interest since its FDA approved fostamatinib drug is also being studied in hospitalized Covid patients.

    "Rigel Awarded $16.5 Million from U.S. Department of Defense for Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Fostamatinib in COVID-19 Patients"


    https://ir.rigel.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/306/rigel-awarded-16-5-million-from-u-s-department-of-defense

    Recent Price and Volume trend higher:

    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/RIGL/history?p=RIGL

    The drug is already approved in the U.S. and Europe, brand name TAVALISSE®, for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia in adults.

    I own 100 shares bought at $1.71:
    Item # 5.A.
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2019/10/observations-and-sample-of-recent.html

    Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc
    $4.1700 +$0.1200 2.96%
    Volume 5,183,003
    Avg. Volume 2,780,751


    AFTER HOURS
    $4.23 +$0.06 +1.44%
    After Hours Volume: 213.3K

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your lottery buys seem to do well. I can afford to dip in. Even if it's all lost.

      I can't buy this one though. I'd type in ABBA and wind up mixing them up.

      (If wouldn't really stop me.)

      Delete
    2. Land: I quit tallying results from Lotto roundtrips in 2015. Trade snapshots through 10/1/2015, with a net of +$14,012.42, can be found here.

      https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2011/10/lottery-ticket-strategy-new-gateway-post.html

      I have probably improved the gain-loss ratio since then. There will be crash and burns along the way.

      Periodically, I will clean house of the losers, as noted in that post where I took $1,912.53 in losses.

      I really have no idea about whether AKBA will be successful. I noted earlier a major problem with its key pipeline drug.

      I noticed this morning that JPM downgraded the stock to underweight from neutral on 1/29/21. This is not something I follow on anything close to a regular basis for Lottery Tickets.

      I discovered that downgrade only because I thought that I had bought 15 or more AKBA shares beyond the 25 discussed here so I went on an expedition to find them.

      I discovered there were in fact 15 more AKBA shares in my Schwab account bought at $2.9 which I just sold at $4.21, keeping the 25 shares held in my Fidelity account.

      My first year at college was in 1969. Back then it was difficult to find a college that would allow me to avoid calculus. I went to one where I could avoid that subject and took philosophy in its place. I avoided science and math like I would the bubonic plague.

      Delete
    3. I'm surprised since you track lots of stuff at the same time and keep resources organized. Those can be math related skills.

      For college I wanted to avoid language requirements and too much writing. I did math-compsci. I can't add or make change (back when people used cash.) When they put letters into the equations I was much happier. I didn't ever really grasp calculus. So, not surprised you (or anyone) wanted to avoid it. But the classes after that were quite fun.

      Philosophy sounds fun too. Illogically, my school counted learning a computer language as a language. That got me out of that mess. However I had it in my head that one should take a language to be well rounded. I took 1 semester. I worked harder than I did in any other class in the 4 years. I passed but it was the lowest grade I got. I did not sign up for a language again. Some people shouldn't take languages.

      I'm not doing anything today. Hopefully over the weekend I'll spot some not yet overblown stocks I want to buy (maybe in the DOW that's struggling). It's probably time to buy travel and in-store shopping stocks.

      But with the rally, I don't want to buy in. But nothing weak's rallied enough to sell. Nor any strong rallied enough.

      It's losing speed as the day goes on. I can't tell anymore if this rally will compete the trend and the market will bull some more. Of if there's another leg down coming. In the past year there hasn't been a 2nd leg.

      The VZ test of strategy sounds promising. I'm just holding until around 58, the near peak.


      Delete
  21. MetLife Inc.
    $50.54 +$1.63 +3.33%
    Last Updated: Feb 4, 2021 at 9:51 a.m. EST
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/met?mod=over_search

    I find life insurance company accounting incomprehensible. Possibly, if an expert could spoon feed me knowledge for about two days, which I would never sit through, I could form an opinion on matters relating thereto.

    MET reported GAAP E.P.S. of $.14 and non-GAAP E.P.S. of $2.03 beating the consensus estimate of $1.53.

    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210203005855/en/MetLife-Announces-Full-Year-and-Fourth-Quarter-2020-Results

    There was a 15% increase in "Premiums, fees and other revenues". But then excluding "pension risk transfers, those revenues increased by 4% rather than 4%.

    So far the Stock Jocks are reacting positively.

    I own a few shares bought between $35.52 and $37.3 and have discussed only the purchases here that were made in my Vanguard taxable account.

    Item # 1.F. Restarted MET-Bought 5 at $37.3
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2020/08/bam-brgpra-fcf-fivg-jcap-jcaprb-kgfhy.html

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bad news is good news. The market's going to rally on the stimulus. If it's still upbeat on monday, I'm going to bet and chase some. The hearing may change that.

    (Was out today for a medical thing, so didn't have a chance to do much.

    Curiously TXN went down, a bounce and is starting down again. It's a trading contender.

    UNM's report wasn't liked. I haven't looked at why yet. I have very little in & it's still green. (So may want to buy - or sell or ignore.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: UNM is held in disfavor and the last earnings report confirmed why:

      The company took an additional hit on reserves for its long term care insurance policies:

      "after-tax reserve increase of $119.7 million ($0.59 per diluted common share) in the long-term care product line of our Closed Block segment."

      https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/unum-group-reports-fourth-quarter-2020-results-301222720.html

      There were also charges for other closed block lines.

      Those items are included in GAAP which was reported at $.66.

      Non-GAAP ex items was at $1.15 vs. consensus at $1.19 according to Fidelity.

      I own just 5 shares as a bond substitute bought at $16.2:

      Item # 1.K. https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2020/11/aod-axpra-bam-bzh-csco-cxp-fdus-fmagx.html

      I do not view the dividend as being in danger.

      https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/unum-group-declares-quarterly-dividend-of-0-285-per-share-of-its-common-stock-301209287.html

      I do not pay much attention to TXN. I did note this from Barron's:

      "Texas Instruments Director Martin Craighead Buys the Dip"
      https://www.barrons.com/articles/texas-instruments-director-martin-craighead-buys-stock-51612563140

      3M did increase its quarterly dividend last week but only by 1%.

      https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/3m-board-declares-increase-to-first-quarter-2021-dividend-301220745.html

      Argus raised it recommendation to buy last week with a $200 PT. (report available at Schwab)

      Delete
    2. So it's that UNM continues to be a value bet for long term. A bet that the market is pricing in short term rather than full long term picture.

      Long term care products were sold on life expediencies that were under estimated. Which reminds me I need to call my 94 year old aunt.

      TXN - this wasn't a dip. It only looks like it because it's flown so much. So Craighead's advice reflects the exuberant market. Still may be a place to buy for the next leg (or by now are they wings?) up.

      Well good, MMM may yet be a good price to get out at.

      Delete
  23. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2021/02/aep-aiq-ed-edoc-etr-ffic-fidu-gis-ivz.html

    ReplyDelete