Wednesday, January 29, 2025

ARCC, ASBPRF, FALN, FLGB, FNLC, LGND, PNNT, SCM, SU, T, TRPPRE:CA, VKTX, WU

Economy

DeepSeek: A shocking Chinese AI advancement is sending US stocks plunging | CNN Business The DeepSeek App is currently available for download at the Apple Store. The Chinese company that created the App  allows anyone to use, adapt or improve the product. How China’s DeepSeek AI Chatbot Became an Overnight Success - The Atlantic 

How Chinese AI Startup DeepSeek Made a Model that Rivals OpenAI | WIRED

DeepSeek is a modern Sputnik moment for West | The Strategist It is too early to draw that conclusion IMO. This development at least raise a question of whether trillions need to be spent buying expensive chips and building more data centers for the AI market. 

Corporate tax cuts don’t boost the economy — despite what many investors believe - MarketWatch (subscription publication), summarizing this article at No, higher corporate taxes do not reduce profits

Krugman Calls Trump Tariffs 'Really, Really Destructive' - YouTube

This video published at the WSJ's YouTube channel summarizes some of the negative economic repercussions from mass deportations: The Hidden Costs of Trump's Mass Deportations | WSJ - YouTube

Deporting 80-90 immigrants at a time, using military aircraft, will not have much of an impact on the U.S. economy for several months. It will be extremely expensive. The cost of deporting 80 immigrants using a C-17 military aircraft from Texas to Guatemala was $252,000. Using a C-130E, the cost skyrockets to between $816,000 to $852,000 per trip. Trump's first deportation flights with average of just 80 migrants cost up to $852,000 per trip - The Mirror US More will most likely enter the U.S. illegally than are deported each day.

Based on the current prices of major U.S. stock indexes, investors do not believe that Trump will start a tariff war, as he said that he would do. The consensus IMO, expressed through the current stock market levels, is that Trump is all bark and no bite on tariffs. I do not have the same confidence, viewing it as more probable than not that Trump will start a widespread trade war given the numerous statements that he made on this topic both prior to and after the election including a statement made last Tuesday on his behalf regarding 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% tariff on China's exports. Trump still expects to impose Feb 1 tariffs on Canada and Mexico, White House says | Reuters

Point72's CEO Steven Cohen anticipates market peak soon-Investing.com

+++

Allocation Shifts Discussed in this Post

I am in a pause as a stock buyer, as I wait for more information about the potential impacts of Trump policies on the U.S. economy. I do not need to own any stocks and will continue to do some light selling to reduce my average cost per share in some existing stock positions which is part of my overall risk reduction strategy.  

I may sell 50 shares of PRWCX later this week. 

I will continue buying treasury bills, treasury notes, and corporate bonds where I am merely redeploying proceeds from maturing securities.  

Treasury Bills Purchased at Auction (principal amount): $15,000

Treasury Notes Purchased at Auction (principal amount): $3,000

Corporate Bonds (principal amount): $10,000 

Outflow  U.S. Common Stocks: -$464.32

(Consisting of $754.05 in proceeds minus $289.73 in purchases with a realized gain of +$265.75)

Inflow Stock Funds: +$135

Net Outflow Common Stocks/Stock Funds: -$320.32

Outflow Canadian Reset Equity Preferred Stock: -C$1,974 (realized gain at +C$413)

2025 Net Inflow U.S. Common Stocks/Stock Funds: +$1,804.53

I may be back to a net outflow in 2025 by month's end.  

January Treasury Yield Curve: 


10 Year TIP Breakeven Inflation: 2.42%, up from 2.12% as of 9/17/24. 

Inflation expectations continue to trend higher. 

++++++

Some Venting About Trump's Flagrant Law Violations and His attempt to repeal the first sentence of the 14th Amendment by executive order

About a month ago, I published a YouTube video predicting that Trump would repeal, as he promised during the campaign, the birthright citizenship clause in the U.S. Constitution by executive order. Trump Proposes to End Birthright Citizenship by Executive Fiat - YouTube 

He has now done so. Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship – The White House

To create a case and controversy, which is necessary for the federal courts to address the constitutionality of that order, I predicted in that earlier video that Trump would simply order the government to refrain from issuing passports to children born in the United States whose parents were in the country illegally (video at 7:26) 

The U.S. Constitution clearly provides in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment that there is a constitutional right to birthright citizenship: 

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside" Fourteenth Amendment Section 1 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

Immigrants who are in the United States unlawfully are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. and state governments. 

They can be charged with committing crimes and tried in a U.S. court. 

If convicted, they can be sent to a U.S. penitentiary and many have been. 

Civil courts also have jurisdiction over them. 

If an illegal immigrant is involved in a car accident, that person can be sued in court for damages. 

They have to pay taxes. 

If they fail to pay rent, they can be evicted from their apartments. 

If they abuse their child born in the U.S., child protective services can take custody of the child. There is no question but that they have been and are now subject to U.S. jurisdiction. 

The persons who are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction are those who have diplomatic immunity. And that is what subject to the jurisdiction meant when the 14th Amendment was passed by Congress and approved by the states. 

The judicial interpretations standards used by Republican Justices, both the plain and the original meaning standards, support the constitutional right to birthright citizenship. 

Unfortunately, the Republican Justices, who profess to follow those judicial interpretation standards, at least when adherence accomplishes their ideological and religious goals, are results oriented, meaning that they will find a way to reach their preferred policy result on major issues, irrespective of what would be required using an interpretation standard that they profess to follow. This is not something that is new. {My video: Brief history of results oriented Supreme Court Decisions - YouTube}  

A federal district court judge, appointed by President Reagan, has temporarily enjoined the U.S. government from taking action under Trump's executive order taking away birthright citizenship, calling that executive order blatantly unconstitutional, which I view as an accurate statement. 

Birthright citizenship: Judge blocks Trump’s ‘blatantly unconstitutional’ executive order 

The TRO lasts 14 days and will generally be followed by a preliminary injunction hearing. I have not yet looked to see if one has been scheduled. Since the issue is a legal one, the court may combine the preliminary injunction hearing with a trial on the merits.  

++

The Republican Supreme Justices have provided Trump with a carte blanche to commit violations of existing laws, including the criminal ones, as well as the Constitution, without any repercussions as a practical matter. The immunity decision creates an easily followed path for future Presidents to see that the laws are not faithfully executed, which is a constitutional duty of Presidents as provided in Article II of the Constitution.   

I agree with the Erwin Chemerinsky, a constitutional law scholar and Dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, that Trump has already taken "clearly illegal" actions. Possibly Trump is testing whether there are any limits to Presidential powers.  Trump has repeatedly said in the past that he can do whatever he wants to do as President. There are good reasons to believe that the Republican Supreme Court Justices are in sync with that belief. 

While removal after an impeachment conviction is still theoretically possible, this will never happen to Trump, no matter how many laws that he violates over the next 4 years. 

There are no guardrails left to restrain him from exercising what used to be viewed as dictatorial powers prior to the Trump era, but are now cheered by 80 million Trump voters since the result is something that they favor. The cheering would stop abruptly if a far left President was committing law violations to accomplish policy objectives.  

Note that my focus here is on the democratic process and the avoidance of a dictatorship, not whether the policy being advanced is good or bad in my opinion.  

I would classify the current republican party as an authoritarian leaning one, the first major U.S. political party to fall clearly within that classification in the nation's history IMO. 

Arthur Schlesinger published a book in 1974 entitled the "The Imperial Presidency". The Imperial Presidency-Wikipedia The powers of the President  have grown exponentially since 1974 and now includes a get out of jail free card.  

So can Trump fire 15 Inspector Generals without obeying the law passed by Congress, impound funds that Congress has appropriated and signed into law by prior Presidents, and fire career Justice Department employees protected by the civil service statutes? 

The republicans in Congress will never make any attempt to turn Trump into a law abiding citizen, which is impossible anyway IMO, nor will he ever face repercussions from those who voted to give him a second term no matter what he does. 

Any republican politician who even made a slight effort in that direction or to utter even the mildest criticism would be attacked by Trump and would lose the next primary election to someone who would never utter a critical word about him.

I doubt that the Republican Justices, as the most ardent proponents and supporters of the Imperial Presidency, a position antithetical to anything  resembling conservatism in the American tradition, will curtail Trump's violations of laws passed by Congress and signed into law by a prior President.  

Trump has basically impounded funds appropriated by Congress and signed into law by a prior President. Judge blocks Trump federal funding freeze on all public loans, grants and more aid - CBS News Trump is in effect repealing by executive order existing laws through impoundment. It is just another authoritarian act and was predictable based on what he said that he would do during the campaign. I discussed the illegality of impoundment in a YouTube Video. Trump's Proposal To Impound Funds Authorized by Congress pursuant to laws that he does not like - YouTube (published about 7 months ago)

Trump funding freeze a blatant violation of Constitution, federal law: Legal experts - ABC News (1/28/25)

Trump's Attempt to Usurp Congress's Spending Power

Congress, which is now controlled by completely servile Trump loyalists, is merely an extension of Trump, and a mere surplusage appendage. 

The Senate and House republicans might as well give Trump proxies to cast their votes, fire their staffs, thereby saving the government wasteful salary and travel expenses, and just go back home. 

What can you say about 50 republican senators confirming Hegseth as Defense Secretary - nothing positive IMO. Pete Hegseth - Wikipedia Their votes to confirm that creature is just further proof on how irrelevant they are in Trump's America. 

**

Trump’s Colombia Spat Is a Gift to China - The Atlantic I would agree with this assessment. Growing hatred of America outside of the U.S., which Trump will cause, is not the same as earning respect. China will take advantage of this opportunity that Trump is giving and will continue to give.  

+++

Caroline Kennedy calls cousin RFK Jr. a ‘predator’ ahead of his confirmation hearings to be Trump’s health secretary   

+++

1. Canadian Reset Equity Preferred Stocks

A. Pared TRPPRE:CA - Sold 100 of 250 at C$19.75 - IB Account

Quote:  TRP-PE.TO

Proceeds: C$1,974 after C$1 commission.  

Issuer: TC Energy Corp. (TRP)

I have a small ball position in TRP, which I last discussed here: Item # 4.A. Pared TRP - Sold 10 at $47.47 (10/24/24 Post) 

Lots Prior to sale with total cost numbers: I sold the highest cost lot using FIFO accounting

The lot that was sold was purchased in September 2019: Item # 2 Bought 100 TRPPRE at C$15.6 (9/29/19 Post)  

Profit Snapshot: +C$413

Last DiscussedItem #5.A. Bought 100 TRPPRE at C$15 and 50 at C$11.12 (3/28/2020 Post) 

Par Value: C$25 per share 

Resets: Every 5 years at a 2.35% spread to the 5 year Canadian government bond yield. 

Canada 5 Year Government Bond Overview | MarketWatch 

Callable: Only on reset dates

Dividends: Paid Quarterly and Cumulative

Last Reset: October 2024 at 5.08% which makes the stock vulnerable to a persistent rise in rates. TC Energy provides conversion right and dividend rate notice for Series 9 and 10 preferred shares

New Average cost per share: C$13.72 (150 shares)

Snapshot after pare- Price at 1/22/25 close 

The blue circle is how IB communicates a recent change. 

Yield at C$13.72 = 9.26%

Computed as follows: .0508% coupon x. C$25 par value = C$1.27 annual dividend per share ÷ C$13.72 average cost per share = 9.2566%. 

Last Elimination:  Item # 2.A. Sold 100 TRPPRE at C$22.26 (5/23/17 Post)(profit snapshot = C$467.5)

My Video: Canadian Reset Equity Preferred Stocks - YouTube

2. Small Ball Buys

A. Started FLGB - Part 5 at $27

Quote: FLGB | Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF Overview 

Cost: $135

Sponsor's website: Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF - FLGB

Expense Ratio: .09%

The expense ratio is lower than a similar ETF offered by Ishares that has a .5% expense ratio. iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | EWU

Number of Holdings: 104

Top 10 Holdings: 

Of those stocks, my largest position is currently in Unilever, currently at 30+ shares {Last Discussed: Item #1.G. Pared UL - Sold 10 at $60.41 (8/2/24 Post)

Dividends: Paid semiannually at variable rates

Last 2 Dividends: $1.16, rounded up

Yield at $27 Using $1.16 annual = 4.3%

Last Ex Dividend: 12/20/24

B. Added 5 FNLC at $25.35:

Quote: First Bancorp Inc. (FNLC)

Cost $126.75

FNLC is a bank holding company whose operating subsidiary is First National Bank. The headquarters is located in Damariscotta, ME. "First National Bank was established in 1864 and now has 18 branches located along Maine’s coast from Wiscasset to Calais and two branches in the greater Bangor area."

Market Capitalization: Near $290M, multiply market price by the 11,115,528 shares outstanding as of 12/31/24. 

Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy (contains snapshots of realized gains/losses)

I discussed restarting a position in FNLC in my last report. Item # 1.G. Restarted FNLC - Bought 10 at $26.08 (1/22/25 Post) 

New Average cost per share: $25.83 (15 shares)

DividendQuarterly at $.36 per share ($1.44 annually)

FNLC Dividend History & Date

Yield at AC = 5.575%

Last Ex Dividend: 1/6/25 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/31/24): SEC Filed Earnings Press Release 

Comparisons are to the 2023 4th quarter. 

Diluted E.P.S. $.65, up from $.60

NIM: 2.42%, up from 2.34%  

Efficiency Ratio: 56.66%, up from 54.08%

NPL Ratio: .18%, up from .1% (both are good)

NPA Ratio: .14%, up from .07% (both are good)

Charge off ratio: .02% (excellent)

Tangible Book value per share: $19.87, up from $19.12. 

Total deposits up 4.8% from December 31, 2023. 

"Uninsured deposits were an estimated 18.6% of total deposits as of December 31, 2024, and 69% of uninsured deposits were fully collateralized."

As with most banks, interest rate risk in owned securities was mismanaged in 2021. This bank had excessive amounts of low yielding mortgage backed in 2021 and failed to adjust duration. 

As of 9/30/24, the bank owned 706.193M in securities and had an unrealized loss, mostly in mortgage back securities, of $87.821M: 

10-Q at page 10 

This mismanagement of interest rate when it was obvious that interest rates would have to move higher to combat problematic inflation was normal for banks. I am not signaling out this bank for criticism.  

FNLC Realized Gains to Date: $1,339.54

C. Added to Lotto VKTX- Bought 2 at $33.62, 1 at $32.82, 1 at $32.65

Quote: Viking Therapeutics Inc.  (VKTX) 

Cost: $132.71

Website: Viking Therapeutics Home - Viking Therapeutics

SEC Filings 

10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/24

I mentioned these purchases in a  comment published on 1/23/25.

Investment Category: Lottery Ticket

VKTX is an extremely volatile stock with a 52 week price range of $20.91 to $99.41. 

Viking has three primary drugs in clinical trials. 

The volatility in the stock price originates IMO from its weight loss drugs (VK2735), both an injectable and pill versions. 

This is already a crowded field with major drug companies, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly already marketing approved products for this condition. 

News about favorable results for marketed weight loss drugs, or new ones in the pipeline, will negatively impact Viking's stock price. 

Maybe Viking will be able to differentiate its product by securing regulatory approval of its pill version. The company recently started a Phase 2 trial. Viking Therapeutics Announces Initiation of Phase 2 VENTURE-Oral Dosing Trial of VK2735 Tablet Formulation in Patients with Obesity - Jan 8, 2025

The injectable version of VK2735 is further along in trials. Viking Therapeutics Reports New Data from VK2735 Obesity Program at ObesityWeek® 2024 - Nov 4, 2024

Even if these compounds are eventually approved by the FDA, Viking, as a clinical stage biotech, has no experience in manufacturing and marketing approved products. 

Viking must have a major pharmaceutical company to partner VK2735, both in pill and injectable form, who is willing to assume the costs of trials and to make a sizeable initial payment for marketing rights, milestone payments for regulatory approvals, and royalties. In other words, VK2735 needs to monetized soon.   

Another drug that is in late stage trials is VK2809 that has completed a Phase 2b trial for treating NASH. The results are promising: Viking Therapeutics Presents Results from Phase 2b VOYAGE Study of VK2809 in Biopsy-Confirmed NASH/MASH at the 75th Liver Meeting® 2024 - Nov 19, 2024 I own a small ball position in another company that is entitled to receive royalties when and if VK2809 is approved and sales start. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. (LGND) I discuss LGND in Item # 3.F. below. 

There are other products in the pipeline. 

Proof of concept only: Viking Therapeutics Rare Disease Program - Viking Therapeutics "X-ALD is a rare X-linked, inherited neurological disorder characterized by a breakdown in the protective barriers surrounding brain and nerve cells."

Proof of concept only: Viking Therapeutics VK5211 ("orally available, non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulator, or SARM, in development for the treatment of patients recovering from non-elective hip fracture surgery.")

Phase 1 and Phase 2 Proof of Concept: Viking Therapeutics VK0612 - Viking Therapeutics (" Preliminary clinical data suggest VK0612 has the potential to provide substantial glucose-lowering effects, with an attractive safety and convenience profile compared with existing type 2 diabetes therapies")

Preclinical: Viking Therapeutics VK1430 - Viking Therapeutics (part of small molecule inhibitors "of the enzyme diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT-1) for the potential treatment of metabolic disorders such as hypertriglyceridemia, NASH, obesity, and dyslipidemia."  

Recent article: Viking Therapeutics: Strategic Growth and Strong Buy Rating Amidst Advancements in Obesity Drug Pipeline - TipRanks.com

Prior Elimination: I started a small ball Lotto position when VKTX was selling in the low single digits and eliminated that position. Item #1.A. Sold 30 VKTX at $22.84 (5/20/23 Post)(profit snapshot = $551.7

Early Buy Discussions: All of these shares have been sold. Item # 1.I. Added to Lotto VRTX Bought 5 at $4.67; 3 at $4.32; 10 at $3.95 (1/20/22 Post)Item # 1.M. Bought 10 VKTX at $5.88 (7/2/2021 Post) 

My concern then and now is that the weight loss drugs, particularly the injectable version, are too late entries into this space; and Viking lacks the resources or experience to compete with incumbent marketers of approved weight loss products.  

Since I sold the stock in 2023, Viking has made progress in advancing its weight loss and NASH drugs in clinical trials which, IMO, makes the stock somewhat less risky. 

However, there remains risks that one or all of the primary clinical stage compounds may fail to meet end points in later stage trials. There are substantial risks involved in going head-to-head with Lilly and Novo, even with regulatory approvals.  

Current Position: 6 shares

Average Cost per share: $39.76

Dividends: None and none expected

Last DiscussedItem # 3.F. Restarted VKTX - Bought 1 at $53.89; 1 at $51.95(11/27/24 Post) I discussed the last loss report in that post. SEC Filed Press Release and 10-Q

Since I eliminated my position in 2023, Viking has raised significant amounts of capital selling shares. 

Last Stock Offering (3/24): Prospectus 6.471M shares, plus greenshoe, at a public offering price of $85 per share. The greenshoe was exercised by the underwriters bringing the total offering to 7,441,650 shares sold at $85, with about $632.5M in proceeds to Viking after the underwriters' commission. Viking Therapeutics Announces Closing of Public Offering of Common Stock Including Full Exercise of Underwriters' Option to Purchase Additional Shares - Mar 4, 2024

D. Added to WU - Bought 3 at $10.26

Quote: Western Union Co. (WU)

Cost: $30.27 

Investment Category: Bond Substitute (Describes the goal rather than the safety of the dividend) 

WU SEC Filings

WU Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

WU Key Metrics Page at Reuters

10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/24

New average cost per share: $11.56 (80+ shares)

Dividend: Quarterly at $.235 per share ($.94 annually)

I am reinvesting the dividend.  

Yield at New AC: 8.13%

Last Ex Dividend: 12/23/24 (owned 70+ as of)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/24 Post) I discussed this report here: Item # 3.C. Bought 5 WU at $11.26; 3 at $10.86 (10/31/24 Post)SEC Filed Press Release and  10-Q.

Goal: Dividend Harvest plus at least 2% annualized return when selling the stock.  

Maximum Position: 100 shares. 

Recent NewsWestern Union Announces New $1 Billion Share Repurchase Program

3. Small Ball Sells

A. Pared Duplicate Position in T - Sold 7 at $24.17

Quote: AT&T Inc. (T)

Using the specific identification method, I sold my highest cost shares. 

Proceeds: $169.19

T Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

T SEC Filings

Investment Category: Bond Substitute (Describes the goal, which is harvesting the dividend and realizing at least a 2% annual return when selling shares,  rather than the safety of the dividend. AT&T slashed its dividend from $.52 to the current $.2775 per share effective for the 2022 second quarter payment.)

Last DiscussedItem # 1.G. Continued to Pare AT&T (T) - Sold Highest Cost 5 Shares in my Fidelity Account at $23.08 (12/5/24 Post)Item # 2.H. Sold 5 T at $22.98; 5 at $23.01 in Schwab Account (11/27/24 Post)(profit snapshot = $41.11); Item # 2.C. Pared AT&T in 2 Taxable Accounts - Sold 5 at $22.37; 5 at $22.22 (10/31/24 Post)(profit snapshot = $38.89; discussed 2024 third quarter earnings report, SEC Filed Press Release

Profit Snapshot: $32.14 

New average cost per share this account: $16.87 (25+ shares)

The AC per share was reduced from $17.29. 

Remaining Shares this account: Another example of small ball. 

Dividend: Quarterly at $.2775 per share ($1.11 annually)

AT&T Inc. (T) Dividend History | Nasdaq

Yield at New AC per share: 6.58%

The yield was increased from 6.42% as a result of selling the highest cost 7 shares. 

Last Ex Dividend: 1/10/25  

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 12/31/24): This report was released on 1/27/25. The stock rose in response and I elected to sell into the rally.   

SEC Filed Earnings Press Release 

E.P.S. $.56

Adjusted E.P.S. = .54

Consensus non-GAAP at $.50 


2024 Annual Free Cash Flow +$17.6B, up .9B compared to 2023

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP: 

Sourced:  SEC Filing 

Note that adjusted E.P.S. declined to $2.26 last year from $2.41 in 2023. 

Adjusted E.P.S. guidance for 2025: $1.97-$2.07 which excludes contributions from the 70% interest in DirectTV whose sale to TPG is expected to close in mid-2025. 

+482,oo0 postpaid net phone additions, better than the consensus 

+307,000 net subscriber adds in broadband. 

B. Pared SCM -  Sold 5 at $14.76

Quote: Stellus Capital Investment Corp. (SCM) - Externally Managed BDC

Proceeds: $73.8

I sold my highest cost lot using the specific identification method.  

SEC Filings

SEC Filed 2023 Annual Report (Risk summary starts at page 34 and ends at page 69)

Website: Stellus Capital Management

Last DiscussedItem # 3.A. Pared SCM - Sold Highest Cost 5 Shares at $13.83- Fidelity Account (4/26/24 Post)(profit snapshot = $30.92) 

Profit Snapshot: +$36.15

New Average cost per share: $6.98 (25 Shares)

Snapshot Intraday on 1/23/25 after pare

Dividend: Monthly at $.1333 per share ($1.6 annually)

SCM Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha

Yield at $6.98: 22.92%

Next Ex Dividend: 1/31/25

Net Asset value per share history

9/30/24:   $13.55

12/31/23:  $13.26

12/31/22:  $14.02

9/30/22:   $14.18 10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/22 at page 1 

6/30/22:   $14.32 10-Q for the Q/E 6/30/22 

12/31/21:   $14.61 

9/30/21:    $14.15 

6/30/21:    $14.07

3/31/21:    $14.03  10-Q for the Q/E 3/31/21 at page 3 

12/31/20:  $14.03   10-K at page 74 
12/31/19:   $14.14

12/31/18:   $14.09
12/31/17:   $13.81
12/31/16    $13.69
12/31/15:   $13.19
12/31/14:   $13.94
12/31/13:   $14.54

November 2012: IPO at $15 ($14.46 after underwriters discount)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/24): 

I had a negative reaction to this report. 

Stellus Capital Investment Corporation Reports Results for its Third Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2024 | Nasdaq

NII per share: $.39, down from $.47

95% of loans at floating rates 

Net Realized Loss on Investments per share: $.13 and $.87 per share for the 9 months ending on 9/30/24 

10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/24 A summary of investments starts at page 5.  

Composition of Investments: 

10-Q at page 45

Company Assessment of Credit Risks: 

10-Q at page 68
6 portfolio companies on non-accrual representing "approximately 6.9% of our loan portfolio at cost and 4.7% at fair value." I do not like those numbers. 

With 6.95% of the total portfolio loans based on costs on nonaccrual status during an economic expansion, what happens to many of the loans, which are current in their loan payments, when there is a significant downturn in the economy?  

Company Assessment of Impacts on Net Investment Income from Changes in Interest Rates: 

10-Q at page 79

With floating rate loans, net interest income will decline as interest rates fall. 

Last Substantive Buy DiscussionsItem # 1.E. Bought 5 SCM at $7.41 in Fidelity Account (8/15/20 Post)Item # 3.J. Added 10 SCM at $7.85; 5 at $7.65; 10 at $7.5 (7/18/20 Post)Item # 2.B. Added 10 SCM at $7.8; 2 at $6.26, 3 at $5.30; 5 at $7.53 (5/9/20 Post).

Other Sell DiscussionsItem # 2.B. Eliminated SCM in Vanguard Taxable Account Sold 30 at $15.36 and Item # 2.C. Eliminated SCM ins Schwab Account-Sold 10 at $15.55 (2/20/23 Post)(profit snapshots = $310.04); 

Item # 3.C. Pared SCM in Fidelity Account - Sold 5 at $13.89  (8/23/22 Post)(profit snapshot = $28.69);  Item 2.L. Pared SCM in Fidelity Taxable Account-Sold 5 at $14 (12/3/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $30.75); 

Item # 2.B. Sold 8.558 SCM shares at $13.19 (8/27/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $45.73); Item # 2.G. Pared SCM in Vanguard Taxable-Sold 10 at $13.2 (6/19/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $11.33); Item # 1.C. Pared SCM in Fidelity Taxable -Sold 13 at $12.46 and 13+ at $13.25 (4/17/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $69.04); Item # 1.F. Pared SCM in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 20 at $11.08 and Item #1.G. Pared SCM in Vanguard Taxable-Sold 20 at $11.17 (12/19/20 Post)(profit snapshots = $14.23); Item # 3 Sold 50 SCM at $13.72 (9/21/19 Post)(eliminating position as of that date; profit snapshot = $3.75); Item # 1.I. Sold 20 SCM at $7.61 (8/22/20 Post)(contains snapshots of prior trades; profit snapshot = $10.84); Item # 1.B. Sold 32+ SCM at $14.22-Used Commission Free Trade (2/2/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $78.09); Item # 1.A. Sold Highest Cost Lot-50 Shares at $12.63 (5/3/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $34.24); Item 2.B. Sold 100 SCM at $14.23 (2/27/17 Post)(profit snapshot=$285.96); Item # 2 Sold 100 SCM at $13.02 (1/12/17 Post)(profit snapshot= $141.96) 

SCM Realized Gains to Date$1,131.72

Goal: Any total return in excess of the dividends paid. 

C. Pared ARCC Again in Fidelity Account - Sold 5 at $23.42

Quote: Ares Capital Corp (ARCC) - Externally managed BDC

Proceeds: $117.1

ARCC is one of the best externally managed BDCs IMO. 


2023 SEC Filed Annual Report (Risk factor summary starts at page 23 and ends at page 54)

Profit Snapshot: $58.41

Average cost per share: $9.57 (15 shares)

Snapshot Intraday on 1/23/25 after pare

Regular Dividend: Quarterly at $.48 per share ($1.92 annually)

ARCC Dividend History & Date | Seeking Alpha

Special Dividends: $.09 per share in special dividend were paid in 2023. 

Yield at $9.57 (regular dividend only): 20.06

Last Ex Dividend: 12/13/24

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/24): I discussed this report here: Item # 2.E. Pared ARCC in Fidelity Account - Sold 5 at $21.64 (11/27/24 Post)(profit snapshot = $48.01; has links to prior sell discussions); SEC Filed Earnings Press Release

ARCC Realized Gains to Date: $1,116.46

Goal: Any total return in excess of the dividends paid. 

ARCC SU Bonds: I currently own 12. 

Stacked as follows: 

6 of the 4.25% SU bond that matures on 3/12/25

4 of the 3.25% SU bond that matures on 7/15/25

2 of the 3.875% SU bond that matures on 1/15/26 (discussed in Item # 4.D. below)

Last Bond Offering (1/25):  Prospectus for $1B in a 5.8% SU note maturing in 2032. 

D. Eliminated Duplicate Position in PNNT - Sold 26+ at $6.96

Quote: PennantPark Investment Corp. (PNNT) - Externally Managed BDC

Proceeds: $182.31

SEC Filings

Website: Investors | PennantPark

Annual Report for the F/Y Ending 9/30/24 (Risk factor summary starts at page 21 and ends at page 38; summary of investments starts at page 54)

Profit Snapshot: $42.88

Last DiscussedItem # 3.L. Added to PNNT - Bought 5 at $4.95; 5 at $4.75  (5/6/23 Post);  Item # 1.F. Bought 5 PNNT at $5.11 (4/15/23 Post)

PNNT recently preannounced that its net income per share for the 2024 4th quarter would be $.19- $.21 below its current quarterly dividend of $.24 paid in 3 monthly installment of 8 cents. 

Sourced from SEC Filing 

PNNT Dividend History | Seeking Alpha

Last Ex Dividend: 1/15/25

Net income for many BDCs have been trending down due to increases in nonperforming loans and floating rate loans, priced at spreads to short term rates,  resetting at lower coupons. Together, that makes these high risk stocks far less appealing to me as a hold, particularly those that have experienced a significant increase in NPLs even though the economy is still in an expansion phase. 

Net Asset Value per share history: Unfavorable 

9/30/24:    $7.56

9/30/23:     $7.7

12/31/22:    $7.11    10-Q at page 4 

12/31/21:    $10.11  10-Q at page 4

12/31/20:   $8.79   10-Q at page 4

12/31/19     $8.79
06/30/19   $8.74
12/31/18     $9.05
12/31/17     $ 9.1
12/31/16     $ 9.11
12/31/15     $ 9.02
9/30/15      $ 9.82
12/31/14     $10.43
9/20/14      $11.03
12/31/13     $10.8
12/31/12     $10.38
12/31/10     $11.14
9/30/10      $10.69
12/31/09    $11.86
12/31/08    $10.24
12//31/07   $12.07

9/30/07      $12.83

IPO at $15 Prospectus April 2007
 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/24): SEC Filed Press Release 

NII per share: $.22

The "portfolio totaled $1,328.1 million and consisted of $667.9 million or 50% of first lien secured debt, $99.6 million or 7% of U.S. Government Securities, $67.2 million or 5% of second lien secured debt, $181.7 million or 14% of subordinated debt (including $115.9 million or 9% in PSLF) and $311.7 million or 23% of preferred and common equity (including $67.9 million or 5% in PSLF). Our interest bearing debt portfolio consisted of 94% variable-rate investments and 6% fixed-rate investments. As of September 30, 2024, we had two portfolio companies on non-accrual, representing 4.1% and 2.3% percent of our overall portfolio on a cost and fair value basis, respectively."

"For the three months and year ended September 30, 2024, net realized gains (losses) totaled $2.5 million and $(33.6) million, respectively. For the three months and year ended September 30, 2023, net realized gains (losses) totaled $(5.2) million and $(156.8) million, respectively."

I still own 10+ shares in my Fidelity account with an average cost per share at $3.08. 

E. Pared SU - Sold 2+ at $39.19

Quotes: 

USDs: Suncor Energy Inc (SU) 

CADs: Suncor Energy Inc.  (Canada: Toronto) 

Canadian Dollar to US Dollar Exchange Rate Chart | Xe

Proceeds: $93.59 

I sold my highest cost lots using the specific identification method. 

There is a risk that Trump will impose a 25% tariff on Canadian exports to the U.S. including energy products. That will adversely impact Canadian E&P companies and possibly energy infrastructure companies, provided the tariff remains in effect for more than a few weeks and U.S. buyers seek out other sources that are not subject to tariffs. 

It is the U.S. importer that has to pay the tariff tax contrary to Trump's false assertion, repeatedly made by him, that the foreign country pays the tariff tax.  

SU Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

Website: Suncor

SEC Filings (foreign company forms)

For the 1 year period ending 1/24/25, the USD priced SU share was up 22.37% compared to the +29.08% for the CAD price share. The disparity is due to the CAD losing value against the USD.

Profit Snapshot: $54.36

Last DiscussedItem # 1.I. Eliminated SU in 2 Taxable Accounts - Sold 8 at $33.09; 10 at $33.29 (2/13/23 Post)(profit snapshots = $273

Last Buy DiscussionItem # 2.K. Added to SU in Vanguard Taxable Account-Bought 2 SU at $20.93 (5/8/21 Post)

New Average cost per share: $13.33 (12+ shares)

Snapshot Intraday on 1/24/25 after pare

The AC per share was reduced from $13.83. 

DividendQuarterly at C$.57, raised from C$.545 effective for the 2024 4th quarter payment. Slashed from C$.465 to C$.21 effective for the 2020 second quarter payment. 

Dividend In USDsSU Dividend History | Seeking Alpha (substantial slash in 2020)  

Last 4 Dividends in USDs: $1.6086 (rounded up to $1.61) 

Yield at New AC of $13.33 Using $1.61 annual = 12.08%

Last Ex Dividend: 12/3/24

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/24): SEC Filed Press Release 

Data is in Canadian Dollars. Comparisons are to the 2023 third quarter.  

Net Income: $2.02B
E.P.S. $1.59, up from $1.19
Adjusted E.P.S. $1.48, down from $1.52
Free Funds Flow: $2.232B

The downward adjustments to reported net income in the 2024 third quarter involved eliminating unrealized gains on foreign currency exchange on U.S.D denominated debt and risk management activities.   

Operating Results: 


I highlighted the 2014 elimination at $40.95, more than what I sold shares in 2025, to illustrate that this kind of stock is more suited as a trading vehicle than a long term hold - at least from my perspective. 

Possibly SU can be a long term hold provided the entry point is at or near a crash and burn in the stock price which last occurred in 2020-2021. My remaining position originates from shares bought in 2020 (purchases made 3/12/20 through 10/6/20, with the lowest price paid at $11).      

SU Realized Gains to Date: +US$1,304

F. Pared LGND - Sold 1 at $118.06

Quote:Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. (LGND)

Proceeds: $118.06

Market Capitalization at $118.06: $2.23B

52 week range: $67.72-$129.9 (highly volatile)

I would also note that there is usually a wide bid/ask spread. 

LGND SEC Filings

LGND Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

SEC Filed 2023 Annual Report Investment highlights from 2023 are summarized at page 6. 

Website: Ligand Pharmaceuticals - Biopharma's Technology and Capital Partner

Royalty Portfolio - Ligand Pharmaceuticals (contains general information about royalties payable to LGND by other companies)

Royalties and Milestone Payments from Approved Products: 

10-Q at page 13

10-Q for the Q/E 9/30/24 

Potential Royalties from Clinical Stage Drugs: 

There are other pipeline products. 

Investment Category: Lottery Ticket

I view this type of investment as an alternative to playing blackjack at a casino. Losing and winning hands are just part of the game. With ongoing revenue streams, Ligand is less risky IMO than Viking that has no approved products yet. 

Profit Snapshot: $41.81

New Average cost per share: $72.96 (6+ Shares)

Snapshot Intraday on 1/28/25 after pare

Last DiscussedItem # 5.C. Eliminated Duplicate Position In LGND - Sold 2 at $103.69 - Schwab Account (8/21/24 Post)(profit Snapshot = $31.19) I discussed the 2024 second quarter report and some of the recent problems in that post. SEC Filed Press Release 

Last Buy DiscussionItem #1.B. Added to LGND - Bought $30 at $77.22; 1 at $76; 1 at $75; 1 at $73; 1 at $71.8 (3/8/24 Post)

Dividend: None and none expected which is one reason for the LT classification. 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 9/30/24): SEC Filed Earnings Press Release 

GAAP E.P.S. (.39)

Non-GAAP E.P.S. $1.84

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP: There are a lot of adjustments which I do not like. 

Some reasons why this stock may succeed are the number of pipeline products that may generate future royalties, possible success in investments (e.g Primrose Bio),  and the relatively small number of shares at 18.419M.   

LGND has sold Viking (VKTX) shares at substantial realized gains, as previously discussed, and still owns 1M shares as of 9/30/24. Ligand has executed a collar in 2024 to hedge against fluctuations in those shares. The realized gain in 2023 was $44.4M. (2023 Annual Report at page 86)

During the 9 months ending on 9/30/24, LGND sold .7M VKTX shares for a realized gain of $60M. The shares were acquired as part of Ligand licensing several compounds to Viking. The furthest along in trials is VK2809 for NASH.

Acquisitions are discussed at pages 23-24 of the 10-Q The largest acquisition was in July 2024 when Ligand acquired the outstanding shares of Biologics AG for $100.5M in base consideration, using cash on hand. This acquisition included royalty payments for Qarziba, a commercial stage product for the treatment of  high-risk neuroblastoma approved for marketing in 35 countries. Ligand to Acquire APEIRON Biologics AG for $100 Million (7/8/24) ("The APEIRON acquisition will be immediately accretive to Ligand’s earnings per share (EPS) by approximately $1.00 on an annualized basis. Ligand is increasing its 2024 revenue guidance to be in the range of $140 million to $157 million (previously $130 million to $142 million) and is raising core adjusted EPS guidance to $5.00 to $5.50 (previously $4.25 to $4.75). Royalties are now expected to range from $100 million to $105 million (previously $90 million to $95 million). Guidance for sales of Captisol® is unchanged at $25 million to $27 million and contract revenue is now expected to range from $15 million to $25 million (previously $15 million to $20 million"). This acquisition closed in July 2024. 

The investment in Primrose Bio, "a private company focused on synthetic biology", is summarized at page 21-23. 

A royalty purchase agreement with Agenus is summarized at page 21. 

LGND has used some cash to purchase royalty streams owed to other companies when and if certain products receive regulatory approval. This is similar to the business of Royalty Pharma PLC (RPRX)

A quick failure was Ligand's $30M purchase of royalties that may have been paid to Ovid Therapeutics by Takeda related to Ovid's soticlestat which failed in a Phase 3 trial. During the 9 months ending on 9/30/24, LGND wrote off this investment by 26.2M. I do not agree with removing that charge from GAAP earnings since purchasing royalty streams is now part of LGND's ongoing business.

For such a small company, Ligand is complicated and has a lot of moving parts. 

4. Corporate Bonds

A. Bought 2 General Motors Financial 4% SU Maturing on 10/6/26 at a Total Cost of 98.653

Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of General Motors Co. (GM) who does not guarantee the notes. 

GM Financial SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 9/30/24  (net income of $499M for the quarter and $1.6B for the 9 months) 

GM Financial SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for Q/E 12/31/24 (net income of $215M which included a $320M impairment charge for an investment in SAIC-GMAC)

GM Financial SEC Filings 

Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org

Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB

The credit rating will be the same as for GM issued bonds. Fitch Revises General Motors' Outlook to Positive; Affirms IDR at 'BBB'

If the parent company filed for bankruptcy again,as it did in 2009, it is possible that the the GM Financial subsidiary could survive outside of bankruptcy reorganization, which is relevant to the bond owners, and consequently would be a slightly better credit risk.  

YTM at Total Cost: 4.822%

Current Yield at TC = 4.055%

I replaced 2 General Motors Finance SU bonds that matured on 1/15/25.

B. Bought 2 Kraft Heinz 3% SU Maturing on 6/1/26 at a Total Cost of 97.8

Issuer: Kraft Heinz Co. (KHC)

KHC Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

KHC SEC Filings

SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the F/Q ending 9/28/24 

I have recently started a small ball position in the common stock.  

Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org

Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB

YTM at Total Cost: 4.668%

Current Yield at TC = 3.068%

C. Bought 2 Omnicom 3.6% SU Maturing on 4/15/26 at a Total Cost of 98.7

Issuer: Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) 

OMC Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

OMC SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 9/30/24 

Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org

Credit Ratings: Baa1/BBB+

YTM at Total Cost: 4.683%

Current Yield at TC: 3.647%

Last Bond Offering (7/24): Prospectus for $600M of a 5.3% SU Maturing in 2033 

Recent News: Omnicom to Acquire Interpublic Group to Create Premier Marketing and Sales Company (12/9/24) This is an all stock acquisition. 

D. Bought 2 Physicians Realty 4.3% SU Maturing on 3/15/27 at a Total Cost of 99.092:

Issuer: Operating entity for Healthpeak Properties Inc. (DOC) who guarantees the notes. 

I have a small ball position in the common stock.  Item # 1.J. Restarted PEAK - Bought 10 at $15.61 (11/4/23 Post)

Physicians Realty was acquired by Healthpeak who thereafter changed its symbol to DOC. I previously owned the common stock of Physician's Realty. 

DOC SEC Filings

SEC Filed 2024 Third Quarter Report

Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org

Credit Ratings: Baa1/BBB+

YTM at Total Cost: 4.744%

Current Yield at TC =  4.339%

I now own 4 bonds. 

E. Bought 2 Ares Capital 3.875% SU Maturing on 1/15/26 at a Total Cost of 99.066

Issuer: Ares Capital Corp. - Externally Managed BDC

I own the common stock in two taxable accounts and have been paring my positions in 2 taxable accounts.  See Item # 3.C. above. 

ARCC SEC Filings

SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 9/30/24 

Finra Page: Bond Page | FINRA.org

Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB

YTM at Total Cost: 4.858%

Current Yield at TC: 3.912%

I own 6 Ares SU bonds that mature on 3/1/25 and 4 maturing on 7/15/25. Prior to this purchase, I did not own any that matured after 7/15/25. 

With this last purchase, I am kicking the can down the road a bit. 

I have realized in the past a "profit" trading Ares SU bonds: 

2020-2021 Trades:




5. Treasury Bills Purchased at Auction

A. Bought 10 Treasury Bills at the 1/27/25 Auction

182 Day Bills

Mature on 7/31/25

Interest: $209.3

Investment Rate: 4.287%

B. Bought 5 Treasury Bills at the 1/23/25 Auction

58 Day Bill

Matures on 3/25/25

Interest: $33.06 

Investment Rate: 4.338%

6. Treasury Notes Purchased at Auctions: 

A. Bought 2 Treasury Notes at the 1/27/25 Auction

2 year note

Matures on 1/31/27

Coupon: 4.125%

YTM: 4.211%  

B. Bought 1 Treasury Note at the 1/27 Auction

5 Year Note

Matures on 1/31/30

Coupon: 4.25%

YTM: 4.43%

When treasury notes are moving down in price and higher in yield, I may buy 1 or 2 more at a lower price. 

A recent example is buying a 7 year treasury note in the secondary market shortly after purchasing 1 at auction. See Item # 5.C. Bought 1 Treasury Note 4.5% Coupon Maturing on 12/31/31 at a Total Cost of 99.585 (1/15/25 Post) This note was auctioned on 12/23/24 at 99.8099. Item # 6.A. Bought at Auction 1 Treasury Note 4.5% Coupon at 99.8099 (1/1/25 Post) 

7. U.S. Equity Preferred Stock

A. Eliminated ASBPRF - Sold 10 at $21.15

Quote: Associated Banc-Corp (ASB-PF)

Proceeds: $211.5

Issuer: Associated Banc-Corp. (ASB) -  A Bank Holding Company

ASB Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

Profit Snapshot: $53.1

Last DiscussedItem # 3.C. Bought 10 ASBPRF at $15.84 (7/15/23 Post)

Prospectus

Par Value: $25

Coupon: 5.625%

Dividend: Paid quarterly, qualified and non-cumulative. 

Maturity: None, potentially perpetual 

Issuer Optional Redemption: On or after 9/15/25 at par value + accrued and unpaid dividend. 

Stopper Clause: Standard. Prior to eliminated the preferred non-cumulative dividend, Associated would have to eliminate the common share cash dividend and refrain from using cash to buy back common stock. The Stopper Clause is the legal mechanism that enforces the preferred stockholders preferential right to cash compared only to the common stock.   

I had 4 Associated Banc 4.25% junior bonds mature on 1/15/25:

+$206.12 Realized Market Discount, rather than a LT Gain

I have eliminated my common share position as well. 

8. Bond ETFs

A. Eliminated FALN - Sold 10 at $27.11:

Quote: iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF Overview

Proceeds: $271.1

Sponsor's website: iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF

The term "fallen angel" refers to a bond that had an investment grade rating but has fallen into a below investment grade credit rating. Many of these bonds will have the highest junk rating from Moody's or S&P, or both. 

I view bond funds with disfavor and will only buy for trades and dividend harvesting. (see my video Bond Funds - Disadvantages - YouTube) They will gain in price when an uptrend in interest rates gives rise to a non-temporary decline. 

Expense Ratio: .25%

Number of Holdings: 162 as of 1/24/25

Effective Duration: 4.59 years

Profit Snapshot: +$15.85

Last DiscussedItem # 1.A. Bought 10 FALN at $25.53 (12/2/23 Post) 

Dividends: Monthly at a variable rate 

The fund will make 2 monthly dividend payments in December and none in January. 

Last Ex Dividend: 12/18/24

This is a similar junk bond fund to the VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) which I have traded in the past. Item #1.K. Eliminated ANGL - Sold 25 at $29.12 (7/3/20 Post)(profit snapshot = $58.44); ANGL - VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | Holdings & Performance | VanEck ANGL currently has a 4 star rating from Morningstar. ANGL – Portfolio- Morningstar 

Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor, but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sale of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals, and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and my family members.      

22 comments:

  1. Trump has rescinded his impoundment of funds authorized by laws passed by Congress and signed into law by prior Presidents.

    Trump claimed there was nothing ambiguous about the order issued to federal agencies to "pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance", a ludicrous claim.

    I suspect that Trump will come back with something that is more specific, referring to existing laws and appropriations. He repeatedly promised to impound funds during the campaign and made it clear that he would ignore the relevant statute passed by Congress and signed into law with bipartisan support in 1974. The law is called the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, 2 U.S.C. § 684. The act was passed after Nixon impounded funds appropriated by congress. see Train v. City of New York, 420 U.S. 35 (Sup.Ct. 1975) Since prior authority means nothing to the Republican Justices, this precedent is no longer safe from repeal by them.

    Impoundment is contrary to that statute and is importantly a violation of the Constitution.

    If the republicans want to deauthorize spending, there is a way to do it in our system. Change the laws regarding specific spending programs by passing legislation in both the Senate and House and then have the new laws signed by the President.

    +++

    I noted earlier today that Canada's Central Bank sent a warning to Trump that his tariff hikes on Canada's exports, as well as the likely retaliatory tariffs imposed on U.S. exports would lead to higher inflation and lower growth in both the U.S. and Canada.

    https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20250129134/the-fed-is-getting-a-warning-from-another-central-bank-about-trumps-tariff-plan

    ++
    I went ahead and entered an order to sell 50 out of about 1,003 shares of PRWCX. I sold 50 shares last November, prior to the year end dividend of $3.5922 per share.

    Item # 1.A. Sold 50 Shares of PRWCX at $38.94:
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2024/11/arty-atlcz-bce-ben-botz-brkl-calf-cvbf.html

    This will take me into a net outflow in stocks/stock funds for my next post.

    I would say that I have more than a few doubts that Trump is going to Make America Greater. For long time readers, my opinions about his character, mental health, judgment and knowledge are well known.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In Item # 1, I corrected the sales price of TRPPRE:CA to C$19.75, as reflected in the trade snapshot. I replaced the incorrect typo of C$17.75.

    ReplyDelete
  3. hello SG, I hope u r well; I have only recently been re following your market and political comments. I wonder if u could give me a short course on how to find corporate bonds that pay a decent yield; what i am referring too is how u go about looking for the less complex bonds, say like from John Deere; the credit ratings are usually old; altho once can get this from actually looking at the company; someone told me that about 60 plus % of public companies go bankrupt during their lifetime and I wondered ( given that i am retired and see that almost no money managers compete very well with the VOO or SPY) how one goes about construction of a heavy etf stock and bond portfolio. Presently with drops in SPY, I buy small amounts, along with QQQ and some SCHD; but a lot of my bonds are coming due this year and i wanted to get your opinion on how u actually go about construction a ladder; when u have the time do this/ I did listen to your youtube vid on the vaguaries(sp?) and risks of bond funds. thank You!

    ReplyDelete
  4. G: As I recall you live in a state that has an income tax. Retired to RI from PA? A state cannot tax interest paid by the U.S. government but will tax corporate bond interest. That difference will take away some of the yield advantage of the corporate bond. If an investor was paying a state tax rate of 5% on corporate bond interest, and the yield was at 4.5%, I would multiply .95% x. 4.5% to get the after tax state tax yield or 4.275%, and then compare that yield with a U.S. treasury maturing at about the same time. Then there is the credit risk issue for corporates which may make the after tax yield spread unattractive compared to treasuries. I would own almost no corporate bonds in a taxable account if I lived in a state that taxed the interest. I buy corporate bonds only because I live in a state with no income tax and I pick up at least $5,000 in additional annual income compared to just owning treasuries.

    Another option for those living in states with income taxes is to buy municipal bonds from issuers located in the state of residence. Municipal bonds trade in 5 bond lots and the market is generally far less liquid than the market for corporate bonds. The ask price is frequently too high as well.

    I would need to know what broker you use to explain how to find bonds. At Fidelity, for example, click the “products” tab, then the “Fixed Income, Bonds, and CDs” tab, then click the green “search for investments” tab. The click the “bonds” tab. I will then do a search for whatever bond I looking to buy: treasury, municipal, or corporate.

    My first focus is to limit the time of the search. For treasury purchases in the secondary market, I will generally now be in the 2027-2030 time frame. I will also participate in treasury bill and note auctions. There is a tab for that as well.

    For corporate bonds, I am limiting searches now to 2027-2028 maturities.

    For Municipal bonds, I will use 2028-2032.

    I am familiar with every corporation whose bonds that I buy. I will check the credit report. I will read at least 1 before buying. Fidelity has the Moody’s reports available for review. I will also review the last earnings report available at the SEC’s website and will look at the 10-Q filing to see where the bond that I might buy is on the maturity schedule, preferring to have the next one to mature or the second.

    For municipal bonds, an investor can limit the search to bonds in the state where you reside in order to avoid state taxation of the interest. The relevant yield comparison is the after federal tax yield when comparing the treasury with a municipal bond whose interest is not subject to either state or federal taxation Most investors IMO need to gain experience in bond buying before venturing into buying municipal bonds in the secondary market. Buying new issues may be an alternative since everyone receives the same price.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks SG, We actually moved to FLA from Pa for the weather; and I use Schwab as my primary broker. I hope that helps; I have no idea how to value municipals. I used to practice medicine, when it actually was in a time when reimbursements were a lot fairer and the crush of Private Equity buying up Gastrenterology practices was not happening; what I call the industrialization of medicine; really an anathema to actually taking proper care of patients; now its a business pure and simple ; another sad fact to add to the flood of the tale of woe that u so valiantly explain in your blog and Youtube casts; I know Schwab has a .35 fee just to buy municipals for a person; which obviously is excessive and defeats the purpose of buying them; any help would be appreciated; I know that you had bought Munis in areas that your u know and even the financials; my hesitation is 1. not knowing the financials and 2. untoward events, ie, whoever thought L A would be crushed and so many lives,and hard earned net worths ruined; so one has to pay attention to worst case scenarios. I have learned alot from your since your days on Seeking Alpha , thank you

      Delete
    2. G. Since Florida does not have a state income tax, corporate bonds are an option for a higher yield than provided by treasuries.

      SCHWAB does not charge a commission for U.S. treasury trades, either at auction or in the secondary market. I use my Schwab account to buy treasuries at auction and in the secondary market. Discussions can be found in my blog posts.

      Schwab does charge a $1 per corporate bond purchase with a $10 minimum charge. I buy corporate bonds now only in my Vanguard, Fidelity and Interactive Brokers accounts since they charge a $1 per bond commission with no minimum charge. I generally buy corporate bonds in 1 or 2 bonds lots. I may end up owning 10 or more but all will be bought in those small lots My position in individual corporate bonds would be similar to a short term investment grade corporate bond fund, being well diversified with over 300 - 400 different bonds.

      I would recommend downloading the treasury auction schedule from the Treasury Department, Just google that phrase. The schedule is in PDF format. If you have not bought Treasuries at auction, I would recommend getting your feet wet by participating in next Monday’s 6 month treasury bill auction.

      In your Schwab account, click the “Trade” tab. Then click “Bonds”. Then click the “Treasury Auctions” tab which can be found under the table.

      When purchasing using a broker, treasuries are bought and sold at $1,000 par values, The default number at Schwab will be a $10,000 principal amount purchase which can be changed to $1,000 or any increment at $1,000 up to $10M.

      Treasury bills, defined as 1 month to 1 year, do not have coupons but are sold at a discount, established at the auction, to par value. Everyone pays the same price.

      Interest is the difference between what was paid and par value.

      You can see how that works by looking at my treasury bill purchases discussion in each blog post.

      When held to maturity, the interest will be taxed in the year that the bill matures. I will use T Bills to shift income tax recognition into the following year when it looks like I am moving in the current year into a higher marginal tax bracket and interest rates may be lower in the next year.

      The price shown at auction is 1/10th of par value. So buying 1 treasury bill at 99 would cost $990.

      You can do corporate bond searches at Schwab. At the table referenced above, for example, click “A” rated corporates and then a maturity time frame. I clicked 2 years just to see what was there. There is a list of what is available to purchase with the minimum order specified under the “Min” tab. There may be smaller minimums available which can be seen by clicking the “Market Depth” link. When the search results are displayed, you can modify the time and credit rating range using the “Modify Search” tab. Investment grade is BBB-/Baa3 and higher. Accrued and unpaid interest has to be paid to the seller when purchasing in the secondary market. That interest amount paid to the seller will be included in your 1099 interest income. I have to deduct the total accrued interest paid to taxable bond sellers for purchases in the secondary market, treasuries and corporates, as a line item in my Schedule B tax form. This is a new layer of complexity for novice investors. If an accountant is used to prepare a tax return, and I have seen at least 2 examples, the accountant may not even know that accrued interest paid to bond sellers needs to be deducted, and their clients end up paying taxes on interest received by the bond seller whose 1099 would include the interest paid by the buyer. Good for the government, bad for the investor. The YTMs are not that much higher than a 2 month treasury note purchase making it not worth the trouble for most individual investors. On “A” rated corporates maturing in 2 years, the yield advantage before the commission charge would be about .25% compared to buying the 2 year treasury note in the secondary market with no commission.


      Delete
  5. Whirlpool Corp. (WHR)
    $ 105.90 -$23.88 -18.40%
    52 Week Range 84.18 - 135.49
    Dividend: Quarterly at $1.75 per share
    ast Updated: Jan 30, 2025 at 10:28 a.m. EST
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/whr?mod=search_symbol

    In my next post, I will discuss selling yesterday 3 of my remaining 8 shares at $132.5. I knew that an earnings report was going to be released today and that WHR had a recent history where earnings or earnings guidance has resulted in a price decline.

    WHR beat the consensus estimate but guided down 2025 E.P.S. to $8.75 vs. the consensus estimate at $11.95.

    The price decline makes the stock more attractive to me as a contrarian value investor. My AC per share has been reduced to $87.32 which creates a 8.03% yield. I am content to hold in my "bond substitute" category and am not in the mood to buy back shares sold at higher prices at the current reduced price.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I was a net seller into today's rally.

    I could not resist buying 5 shares of CMCSA at $32.81:

    Comcast Corp. Cl A
    $33.25 -$4.11 -11.00%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/cmcsa?mod=search_symbol

    My last trade was to eliminate my position by selling 20 at $41.82.

    Item # 2
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2024/10/clpr-cmcsa-emp-enbprpca-fbiox-nbxg-pdm.html

    I started what I call a Placeholder in UPS that was slaughtered today. I bought 1 at $114.

    United Parcel Service Inc. Cl B
    $114.90 -$18.88 -14.11%
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ups?mod=search_symbol

    I will discuss both trades in my next post. Both companies have issues.

    ++

    I have to give some credence to the probabilities assigned in the FED Funds Futures contracts to FED rate cuts. It would be a mistake to cut rates anytime soon IMO given the recent inflation numbers and the uptrend in inflation expectations as reflected in the 5 to 10 year TIP breakeven inflation rates. And Donald is demanding a rate cut notwithstanding the fact that inflation expectations have been rising steadily since the FED cut 50 basis points last September.

    Currently the CME FedWatch Tool, which measures probabilities about the course of the FF rate, has a 69.6% probability of at least a 25 basis point cut on or before the June meeting and a 89.5% probability of at least a 25 basis point cut on or before the December meeting. The probability that the FF range will be at least 50 basis points lower on or before the December meeting at 60.4%.

    +++

    While I am trying to avoid reading statements made by Trump that do not impact my investment decisions, I could not help but see an article at CNBC where he was blaming DEI for the plane and helicopter crash in D.C.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/30/trump-lashes-out-at-biden-dei-efforts-after-dc-plane-crash.html

    He does not need any evidence of course that DEI had anything to do with it in order to make that claim, because he is naturally a shameless loathsome creature.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)
    $189.82 +$ 14.17 +8.06%
    Last Updated: Jan 31, 2025 at 9:50 a.m. EST
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/abbv?mod=search_symbol

    I own only 2 shares.

    The pop is due to the earnings reports released earlier today:

    SEC Filed Press Release
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1551152/000155115225000011/abbv-20241231xexhibit991.htm

    Non-GAAP E.P.S. at $2.16, vs $2.12 consensus
    Revenues +5.6% to $15.10B vs the $14.83B consensus

    2024 Non-GAAP E.P.S. Guidance: $12.12-12.32

    Raised 2027 combined revenue guidance for Skyrizi and Rinvoq to more than $31B, up $4B compared to previous guidance.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I continued to reduce my stock allocation today (1/31).

    I do not need to own any stocks and Trump is making me less willing to assume stock risk at the moment, particularly with stock index P/E ratios, based on trailing 12 month GAAP earnings, are historically high and inflation expectations are increasing as reflected in the breakeven inflation rates of the 5 to 10 year TIPs.

    It looks like he is preparing to start a trade war on Saturday, and whatever he does with increasing tariffs on exports from China, Mexico and Canada may only prove to be the start of a much broader trade war involving almost all nations that export certain products.

    One way companies evade a tariff is to ship the product to another company, possibly a shell, located in a country whose exports are not subject to the tariff tax. By applying an increase to particular products, irrespective of the country of origin, that effectively ends that evasion technique.

    The WSJ Market data pages can be assessed by non-subscribers. Each Friday Birinyi Associates updates the major indexes TTM P/E ratios using GAAP earnings and the next 12 months P/E ratios using non-GAAP estimates which are almost invariably way too high based on the actual results.

    https://www.wsj.com/market-data/stocks/peyields?mod=md_usstk_view_pe_yield_full

    As of today, the TTM P/E for the S&P 500 is at 25.82 and at 22.33 using the estimated non-GAAP earnings over the next 12 months. Those numbers are historically high.

    The Nasdaq 100 TTM P/E using GAAP is at 33.38 and the Russell 2000 at 35.21.

    Using 12 month forward estimate non-GAAP earnings, the Nasdaq P/E falls to 25.75.

    I am now 4 weeks behind in discussing corporate bond purchases and the delay is about to become worse. I have almost 50 that mature tomorrow and 67 T Bills maturing later in February, plus another 20K or so in other corporates/CDs maturing later this month.

    I will also fall behind in discussing my stock and stock fund sale transactions due to the volume number.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I just published a YouTube video discussing how the trade war started by Trump will impact my investment decisions until I have more clarity on the fallout including the retaliatory tariffs that will soon be levied on U.S. exports.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miDYwOrMe6A&t=6s

    None of us have any control of the strong forces that will impact our investments. All that I can do is respond to them as they unfold.

    ReplyDelete
  10. For my next post, I am cutting off discussing common stock and stock fund trades with those made on last Friday (1/31/25) or earlier. My net outflow from stocks/stock funds which will be discussed in the next post is $4,522.22.

    I have entered orders to buy 15 of the 6 month T bill and 5 of the 3 month at tomorrow's auction.

    I will check early in tomorrow morning to see whether the recent news is causing significant distortions in the 6 month T Bill yield. If that yield has fallen too much in a panic flight to safety, I will pull the order to buy 15 and leave a comment here. I am defining too law as less than 4.2% for the 6 month bill.

    As of last Friday, the 6 month bill closed at a 4.309% yield:
    https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/US6M

    I received the proceeds from 48 corporate bonds ($1,000 par values) yesterday 2/1/25. I have 67 T Bills ($1,000 par values) left to mature in February and another 18 or so corporate bonds and a CD. This is normal for a month in how I have constructed my bond ladder.

    Until I can assess better the fallout from Trump's tariff war, and how it is impacting the prices of stocks, I am likely to remain on the sidelines for stock trades for awhile, unless the market for some reason opens higher on Monday, in which case I will sell into the rally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As of 8:00 A.M. CDT, the 6 month treasury bill is trading at 4.306%. I mentioned in an earlier comment that I would check the yield number to see whether something funky was happening. Since that is an acceptable yield, I will keep my order to buy 15 at auction today.

      Delete
  11. I was wondering why it was so quiet. Shoot, I didn't have notify on.

    I planned on selling about 70k at 1% or 2% higher. I was worried about Trump jaw boning or acting. I miss that boat. I did sell 5K previously.

    It's going to be long 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Land: It is going to be a difficult 4 years. Nothing much will change even if the Democrats manage to regain control of the House in 2024. The people who voted for Trump knew who he was and what he would do and he is now giving them what they want.

    The stock indexes are down 1.5% to 2% which is so far a very muted response to the tariff war. That kind of decline could occur for no discernible reason. And that is hardly a buying opportunity from my perspective.

    If there is a major acceleration of the decline into the close, that would likely portend more losses ahead.

    I mentioned in a YT video posted last night that stock investors are IMO still in denial about the tariff war, believing first that Trump was all bark and no bite and now assuming that he will not allow the tariffs to go into effect tomorrow or will quickly resolve the matter.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPtK8KhsuOk

    There is no factual reason supporting that nonchalant opinion but I believe it may remain around until future events prove that it is delusionary.

    ReplyDelete
  13. S&P 500 Index
    6,006.53 -34.00 -0.56%
    Last Updated: Feb 3, 2025 at 11:41 a.m. EST

    If I did not know that Trump had started a trade war and just looked at the S&P 500 index, I would conclude that today was just a normal day with nothing happening to unnerve stock investors.

    I did some light selling earlier today which will be discussed in my 2/12/25 post. The next post will have discussion of trades made through last Friday.

    Treasury Auctions Today- Investment Rates:

    3 month 4.325%
    6 month 4.303%

    https://www.treasurydirect.gov/auctions/announcements-data-results/announcement-results-press-releases/

    The 6 month IR is not consistent IMO with a .25% FED rate cut on or before the June meeting.

    As of 10:40 CDT, the CME FedWatch Tool, which uses the Fed Funds futures contracts, has a 64.9% probability of at least a 25 basis point cut on or before the June meeting.

    https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cme-fedwatch-tool.html

    The current FF range is at 4.25% - 4.5%.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Trump has delayed the 25% tariffs on Mexico's exports for 1 month after the Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum agreed to reinforce the border with 10,000 National Guardsmen in order to stem the flow of drugs.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/economics/mexicos-president-says-tariffs-will-delayed-one-month-rcna190433

    According to Reuters, Canada is not optimistic that it will receive a similar reprieve.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-americans-may-feel-pain-trade-war-with-mexico-canada-china-2025-02-03/

    ReplyDelete
  15. As I have been saying, stock investors have not been concerned that the tariffs would actually be imposed on exports from Canada or Mexico. Trump late today granted a 30 day delay to Canada.

    Trump said that progress had been made after talking with Trudeau noting that Canada would spend $1.3B to beef up the border.

    It is my understanding that Canada had already authorized that expenditure before Trump imposed the tariffs. The Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. made this statement in a PBS interview: "We invested $1.3 billion in new equipment, new infrastructure, more people"

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/canadian-ambassador-to-u-s-hopes-for-off-ramp-to-trade-war-after-trump-tariffs

    The fact that the tariffs have only been delayed indicates that Trump wants more than Mexico and Canada have offered to date.

    Both illegal immigration and drugs across the border with Canada are red herrings. Both are immaterial. So what does Trump really want from the Canadians?

    U.S. automakers rely heavily on parts manufactured in Canada. I have seen various estimates that a 25% tariff on those parts would increase the price of a car bought in the U.S. by $2,700 to $3,000.

    https://www.npr.org/2025/02/03/nx-s1-5285546/trump-tariffs-canada-mexico-autos

    I did do some light buying in two regional bank stocks near the close.

    I have 17 treasury bills that mature on Tuesday. 7 of those are in my Schwab account where I will likely redirect the proceeds into the 4 month treasury bill auction on Wednesday. I do not keep funds in the Schwab sweep account for long.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I recalled out of some distant memory that Trump threatened Mexico with tariffs during his first term but backed off, so I looked into it.

    Mexico was threatened with tariffs in 2019 and then Trump withdrew the threat two days after making it in response to Mexico promising to deploy the national guard, the same promise that it just made to Trump to secure the delay.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/progress-mexico-tariff-talks-still-long-way-go-officials-say-n1015076

    Trump may just be putting on a show for his supporters which creates an impression that something is changing when everything remains the same. The Stock Jocks are probably right to think that he is all bark and no bite on tariffs applied to exports from Canada and Mexico. A reassessment of that opinion will be necessary when and if Trump ever carries through with tariff threats against Mexico and Canada.

    It may be serious about the 10% tariff on China's exports.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well this was funny. I tried to sell 24 KGS since it's had a good run and I think it's time. The PEs are absurd for a gas company. I listed it after hours at 49.41 when the bids were 45 - 46. So just before afterhours ended, one share sold at 49.61. So one down, 23 to go!

    Hopefully I have better luck during the day when I remember.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: For most stocks, there is inadequate liquidity in after hours trading and the bid/ask spreads may be higher than during regular trading hours. The $49.41 price was above the current market range.

      I do not trade in after hours but only during the regular session. I have noted many strange fills in after hours trading, both too high and too low.

      Delete
  18. I have published a new post:

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2025/02/adcpra-aio-bbdc-bnl-brkl-cmcsa-colb.html

    ReplyDelete