Tuesday, August 16, 2022

BHB, BMRN, CIZN, HTBK, MATV, NWFL, OFS, OHI, ORAN, RYLD, SNY

Economy

The government's estimate for housing starts continues to trend down: 

July Monthly New Construction 

China's consumer and factory data miss expectations in July The economic slowdown in China is being aggravated by the government's aggressive actions on Covid outbreaks. 

NY Fed Empire State Manufacturing Index slumps to -31.3 vs. 8.5 expected

Atlanta Fed Wage Growth: 6.7% in July 2022 

Wage Growth Tracker - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Atlanta Fed Sticky Price Inflation: +5.2% (annualized) in July: 

Black Line = Flexible; Orange Line = Sticky  

Sticky-Price CPI - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

++++

Trump is the first President to ever plead the 5th.   

Don the Con refused to answer any questions, other one asking for his name, during a deposition in a civil case, invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The Teflon Don invoked the 5th over 400 times to questions relating to his businesses, property valuations and loans. 

Donald claimed he had no choice: “When your family, your company, and all the people in your orbit have become the targets of an unfounded, politically motivated Witch Hunt supported by lawyers, prosecutors, and the Fake News Media, you have no choice.” Trump takes the Fifth - POLITICODonald Trump invokes Fifth Amendment rights, declines to answer questions from NY attorney general 

Trump had a choice. If he is innocent, as he claims, nothing untoward would happen by simply telling the truth.

Donald refused to testify since truthful answers could be used against him in a criminal case while false testimony would subject him to felony perjury charges. The Hobbesian choice of either incriminating or perjuring himself was resolved in the way that other criminals do-invoke the Fifth Amendment. Republicans do not see it that way and have come to Trump's defense since he is after all their Dear Leader and unchallengeable leader of the GOP. 

Historians privately warn Biden: America’s democracy is on the brink - The Washington Post  I would agree. The power of authoritarians has never been stronger IMO.   

'Stunning': Ex-official who investigated Clinton reacts to documents found in Trump's home - CNN Video

18 CFR § 3a.11 - Classification of official information 

Some documents found in a storage room at Trump's resort were designated Top Secret SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information). This kind of top secret room can only be reviewed in a designated secure location. FBI search of Mar-a-Lago raises critical national security questions: Sources - ABC News

As to the search warrant, Trump now claims that he would have promptly returned the government documents if only he was asked to do so: 

"Truth Social" Posts 8/12/22
 
Timeline: The Justice Department criminal inquiry into Trump taking classified documents to Mar-a-Lago As noted in that article, the effort to secure government documents taken by Trump started in May 2021. After several months of discussions, Trump finally turned over 15 boxes in January 2022. Some news reports claim that this occurred only after Trump was threatened with litigation. The National Archives found classified documents in those boxes and referred the matter to the DOJ for a criminal investigation. The DOJ convened a Grand Jury which has subpoena power. 

Prior to seeking a search warrant, the DOJ tried last April to secure the government records in Trump's possession through a grand jury subpoena.  
 

Fox complained the feds should have subpoenaed Trump’s documents before seeking a search warrant. They did. | Media Matters for America;

Trump received subpoena for classified records this spring | Fox News

At least 1 Trump lawyer signed a statement in June 2022 that all documents marked classified had been returned to the government in response to that GJ subpoena. Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned - The New York Times, republished at MSN.Com at Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned 

On June 22, a grand jury subpoena was served requesting video surveillance video of persons entering the storage area where Trump was storing top secret and other classified documents. 

Feds obtained surveillance footage showing boxes being moved after discussions with DOJ: report 

Mar-a-Lago would obviously be a prime target location for hostile foreign espionage services.  

The government received information that Trump had failed to hand over government documents, including those marked classified and top secret, in response to the GJ subpoena. 

The only option left for the government was a search warrant. 

Trump obviously failed to properly respond to that subpoena since boxes of classified and top secret material were seized in August. FBI search at Mar-a-Lago uncovers 27 boxes of government records, some classified | Nightline - YouTube The search warrant citation of an obstruction criminal statute may point to a knowing concealment of those documents in response to the GJ subpoena.  

Trump is now claiming that he fully cooperated with the National Archives and the DOJ.  

Trump Demands FBI Give Back Documents He Rightfully Stole

Fox "news" is already claiming, without an iota of proof of course, that the FBI planted documents during the Mar-A-Lago search. Donald Trump Suggests FBI Agents 'Planting' Evidence at Mar-a-LagoFox Host Watters Makes Baseless Claim FBI Planted Mar-a-Lago Evidence

GOP reacts to Trump search with threats and comparisons to ‘Gestapo’ - The Washington Post Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) compared the FBI/DOJ to the Gestapo. 

Senator Scott (R-FL) is no stranger to taking the 5th. 

GOP Comparing FBI to Gestapo Is 'Offensive': Holocaust Museum 

Paul Gosar (R-AZ) tweeted "We must destroy the FBI". Marjorie Taylor Greene called upon Congress to "Defund the FBI".  As Search Shows Trump Had Secret Files, G.O.P. Splits Over Assailing F.B.I. - The New York Times

Newt Gingrich compared the FBI to the Stasi. Newt Gingrich on FIRE: The FBI has Become 'American Stasi' - YouTube

Asked about threats to the FBI, Scalise claims without evidence that agents went ‘rogue’ - The Washington Post Scalise (R-LA) is the House Minority Whip for the GOP. 

The republicans rallying to Trump's defense prove once again that they exist in a fact free zone, where nothing but demagoguery, reality creations and mindless drivel flows from them. Their statements have nothing to do with the truth but an unquenchable thirst for power above all else.  

Citizen Trump may have broken a law that President Trump made a felony - The Washington Post

Trump sought to justify his conduct by claiming that Obama took government documents with him to Chicago and refused to give them back. 

The National Archives replied that it had custody of those documents, and there was no truth in Trump's claims. National Archives rejects Trump's claim that Obama took 33 million pages of records | Daily Mail OnlineNational Archives counters Trump baseless claims about Obama records - The Washington Post  

Donald claims that he declassified the documents in his possession while he was President. Trump says "it was all declassified" — how declassification usually works - CBS News The process for declassification is well established and would involve the following steps: (1) Usually, the declassification would be memorialized in a document prepared by the White House counsel (2) The President would sign that document; (3) Before the President would declassify a document, other government officials with knowledge of the matters contained in the document would be consulted about the potential dangers to national security resulting from the declassification; and (4) the classification markings would be crossed out with a notation of when the document was declassified by the President. The classified documents seized at Trump's resort still had their classified markings with no indication of being declassified.

And, I have not yet heard anyone supporting Trump's alleged verbal declassification when he was President. He has no authority to declassify the second that Biden was sworn in as President.  

Even if someone was willing to ignore Trump's long history of making false statements, and accept his claim that the documents were declassified by him when he was President, only an ignorant fool would want Donald to make those unilateral decisions without consulting experts first and following the normal declassification process. Trump’s false or misleading claims total 30,573 over 4 years - The Washington Post  

Donald will frequently falsely accuse others of committing the same bad acts that he has committed.  

(e.g. Clinton Foundation/Trump Foundation: President Trump Ordered To Pay $2 Million For Misusing Trump Foundation Funds-NPR; Clintons received no compensation from the Foundation and no funds were misappropriated for their personal use)

This tactic is a tried and true method used by Trump to deflect attention away from his own misconduct. Unfortunately, this tactic works on millions. 

A substantial number of incendiary, fact free and irresponsible comments were made by Fox hosts and guests, and the usual assortment of Trumpster wingnuts, relating to the lawful search warrant issued by a federal magistrate. Those kind of comments have consequences. 

A Trumpster attempted a violent entry into the FBI office in Cincinnati, wearing body armor and firing a nail gun at government employees. He was also armed with an assault rifle. Armed man who was at Capitol on Jan. 6 is fatally shot after firing into an FBI field office in Cincinnati

FBI attacker was prolific poster on Trump's Truth Social - The Washington Post Calling Trump's website "Truth Social" is just another example of the pure Orwellian thought that prevails in TrumpWorld.  

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) referring to Democrats: “It’s like the old Roman Colosseum where you slam on a breastplate and you grab a battle axe and you go fight the barbarians. As they say in the military world, it is a target-rich environment.” CPAC 2022 Is Rife With Militant Rhetoric About Taking Power - Rolling Stone

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has called for repeal of the Espionage Act. Mar-a-Lago FBI Raid: Rand Paul Calls for Repeal of Espionage Act  

Election deniers march toward power in key 2024 battlegrounds - The Washington Post 

Photos: Russia Jets Destroyed in Surprise Attack on Crimea Airfield Russia claims that it was just an accident. 

Russia will of course routinely torture Ukrainian civilians removed by force to "detention" centers. Six Weeks of ‘Hell’: Inside Russia’s Brutal Ukraine Detentions - The New York Times

++++

1. Corporate Bonds and Treasuries

Almost all purchases made in Roth IRA accounts are not discussed in this blog. 

Since some readers are interested in inflation protected treasuries, I discuss a TIP purchase in Item # 1.H. 

A. Bought 10 Arizona Public Service 3.35% SU Maturing on 6/15/24 at a Total Cost of 99.845:

Issuer: Arizona Public Service is the largest electric utility serving customers in Arizona and is the principal subsidiary of the S&P 500 component Pinnacle West Capital Corp. (PNW) 

PNW SEC Filings

PNW 10-Q for the Q/E 6/30/22 

PNW SEC Filed Earnings Press Release for the Q/E 6/30/22 

The price shown includes a $1 per bond Schwab commission. The bonds were purchased at 99.745. The accrued interest payment of $165.64 paid to the seller will be included as a deduction in my 2022 schedule using 1 line total ("Accrued Interest Paid to Bond Sellers"). 

I received that sum and a few more days of interest on 6/15/22: 

The seller's 1099 will include the $165.64 amount as interest income.   

This bond can be bought at a lower price now. I may buy 2 more.  

B. Bought 2 Brandywine 4.1% SU Bond Maturing on 10/1/24 at a Total Cost of 98.982


Purchased on 7/15/22. Discussed out of time order. 

Issuer: Operating entity for Brandywine Realty (BDN). While BDN guarantees the notes, it has no assets other than its investment in the operating partnership:

BDN SEC Filings

Our Properties | Brandywine Realty Trust

2021 Annual Report

FINRA Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)

Credit Ratings: Baa3/BBB- 

YTM at Total Cost = 4.589%

Current Yield at TC = 4.1422%

I have recently restarted a small ball position in the common shares and discussed the most recent purchases in my last post. 

C. Bought 1 Black Hills 3.95% SU Maturing on 1/15/26 at a Total Cost of 98.999:   

Purchased on 7/21/22. Discussed out of time order. 

Issuer: Black Hills Corp. (BKH) - Utility

I have eliminated my position in the common stock. 

BKH Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

BKH SEC Filings 

FINRA Page: Bond Detail

Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB+

YTM at Total Cost = 4.263%

Current Yield at TC = 3.99%

I now own 3 bonds including 1 in a RI account. 

D. Bought 1 Jefferies Group 4.5% SU Maturing on 7/22/25 at Par-Fidelity Corporate Notes Program

Discussed out of time order. 

Issuer: Wholly owned subsidiary of Jefferies Financial Group (JEF) 

Prospectus 

JEF Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

JEF SEC Filings 

Bond Detail

Credit Ratings: Baa2/BBB 

E. Bought 2 Mondelez 2.125% SU Maturing on 3/17/24 at a Total Cost of 97.842


Purchased 8/3/22. Discussed out of time order.  

Issuer: Mondelez International Inc. Cl A  (MDLZ) 

I now own 6 bonds including 2 in a RI account. 

FINRA Page:  Bond Detail (prospectus not linked)

Prospectus 

Credit Ratings: Baa1/BBB

YTM at Total Cost = 3.509%

Current Yield at TC  = 2.17%

F. Bought 1 Treasury 2.125% Coupon Maturing on 3/31/24 at 98.472

Purchased 8/4/22. Discussed out of time order. 

YTM at Total Cost = 3.079%

Current Yield at TC = 2.158%

I now own 5 bonds. 

G. Bought 1 Appalachian Power 3.4% SU Maturing on 6/1/25 at a Total Cost of 99.371

Purchased 8/8/22. Discussed out of time order.  

The confirmation says American Electric Power, but the issuer is Appalachian Power, a wholly owned subsidiary of AEP. Generally, a SU bond issued by an operating subsidiary of a utility holding company will have a higher credit rating than its parent. AEP bonds are rated Baa2/BBB+, or 1 notch lower than the Appalachian Power SU bonds. 

AEP 10-Q for the Q/E 6/30/22 Results for Appalachian Power can be found at pages 80-90.  

Finra Page: Bond Detail (prospectus linked)

Credit Ratings: Baa1/A-

YTM at Total Cost = 3.636%

Current Yield = 3.42%

I will likely buy 1 or more bonds when and if the price declines enough to generate a 4% YTM. 

On the day of purchase, the 3 year treasury note closed at a 3.14% yield. 2022 Treasury Yield Curve Rates-U.S. Department of the Treasury 

H. Bought 1 Treasury 2.75% Coupon Maturing on 5/15/25 at 98.757

Purchased 8/9/22. Discussed out of time order. 

YTM at Total Cost  = 3.222671%

Current Yield at TC = 2.7846%

I. Bought 2 JP Morgan 2.95% CDs Maturing on 5/12/23:

Quarterly Interest Payments  

Purchased 8/10/22. Discussed out of time order.

J. Bought 1 Treasury 2.875% Coupon Maturing on 11/30/23 at 99.57

YTM at Total Cost = 3.215139%

Current Yield at TC =  2.8874

I now own 2 bonds. 

K. Bought 1 TIP .125% Coupon Maturing on 4/15/26 at 99.273-Roth IRA Account

I now own 2 bonds. 

Real Yield Positive at .325%

While positive, the real yield is meaningless. Note the accrued interest of $.47 for 123 days. Nonetheless, any real yield for a TIP produces a better total return over its term than a IBond purchased today, since the current IBond does not have a coupon but only the CPI inflation accretion to the principal amount. 

The coupon of .125% is applied to the principal amount as adjusted by CPI.  

Inflation Factor = 1.2198  (addition to principal amount arising from CPI since issuance) I have to pay the seller a sum representing this principal accretion. 

Principal Cost 1 Bond = 99.273 = $992.73

If this was a non-inflation protected treasury, the $992.73 would be the full principal amount paid to the seller plus accrued interest. 

Principal Amount Paid to Seller = $1,113.83

Calculation: $992.73 x. Inflation Factor of 1.12198 = $1,113.83  

I will now receive the inflation accretion to the principal amount until the 4/15/26 maturity date which is the only reason to buy this security.

Better or Worse off Compared to Buying a Nominal Treasury Maturing on 4/15/26:  

A nominal treasury maturing on 4/15/26 will have a much higher yield. I could not find a treasury maturing on 4/15 but there is a 2.375% coupon maturing on 4/30/26 that currently has a 3.06% ask yield. 

Breakeven Inflation Rate: This is the annual average CPI that will be required for my TIP purchase to breakeven on a total return basis with the nominal treasury maturing on 4/30/26.  

3.06% - .325% = 2.735%

So I am better off with the TIP if the average annual CPI until maturity is higher than the breakeven inflation rate. The better off is not the result of the TIP coupon so much as the accretion to the principal amount resulting from increases in CPI. 

I do not know what inflation will average from now to 4/30/26, and neither does the seller. My best guess is that it will average more than 2.735%.

The breakeven inflation rate is easier to calculate when the maturity is 5 years since I can just take the yields off the Treasury website. Interest Rate Statistics | U.S. Department of the Treasury

As of 8/15/22 Close- 5 Year Maturity: 

5 Year Nominal Yield = 2.91%

5 Year TIP Real Yield for TIP: .29%

Breakeven Inflation Rate: 2.62%

I will not buy TIPs when the real yield is negative.

5 Year TIP Real Yields

5 Year TIP Breakeven Inflation Rate Chart: Note the recent downtrend. 

On 3/28/22, the breakeven inflation rate was a 3.56%. 

5-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate-St. Louis Fed

2. Bought Back 100 ORAN at $10.36-Schwab Account

History this Account: 

Quotes:  

USD: Orange ADR

Euro: Orange (France: Euronext Paris)

Euro to US Dollar Exchange Rate Chart | Xe

ADR Ratio: 1 for 1 

Investment Category: Bond Substitute 

Website: Orange

ORAN SEC Filings (SEC forms for foreign company)

ORAN.PA - Orange SA Key Metrics | Reuters

2021 Annual Report

Last Elimination this accountItem # 2. Eliminated ORAN - Sold 100 at $11.77 (7/6/22 Post) I had just received the semi-annual dividend.

Last Buy Discussion (shares previously sold): Item # 1.I. Added 10 ORAN at $10.48 (12/31/21 Post) 

Currency Impact: When I sold that lot on 6/27/22, the EUR/USD exchange rate was at 105.66 and had fallen to 102.27 when I purchased this 100 share lot. The decline in the Euro would cause the USD priced ADR to underperform the ordinary shares priced in Euros. The most recent top in the EUR/USD was at 122.5 on 1/5/21. Since that date, the Euro has made a series of lower highs and lower lows.  

Dividend: Semi-Annually. 

Orange (ORAN) Dividend History | Nasdaq

The next ex dividend date will be in December. 

For the last dividend that I received from ORAN, France withheld about a 12.8% tax. (see previous snapshot of trade history in this account) 

The $3.11 "fee" paid in connection with the 100 share purchase is also a tax. The tax is applied to purchases only and amounts to .3% of the purchase amount.  ($1,035.5 x. .003% = $3.1065, rounded up to $3.11)  

Last Ex Dividend: 6/3/22

Yield: The yield before taxes will vary with the then current exchange rate. 

For the USD priced shares, the last two dividends totalled $.765 per share. 

Using that number, the yield at $10.36 is 7.38%.   

Last Earnings Report (Semiannual Period Ending 6/30/22): When I last discussed ORAN, this report had not yet been released. This company provides earnings information only on a semiannual basis. I thought the report was sufficiently okay to try yet another dividend harvest trade.  

SEC Filed Financial Report 

SEC Filed Slide Presentation 

Operating Income to Net Income: 

Revenues from Telecom: €21.297B

Revenues from France: €8.827B

Organic Cash Flow: €1.445B

Analyst Reports (available to Schwab customers): One frequent observation made by analysts is the earnings drag from Orange's operations in Spain, where he is spending a lot of money with inadequate returns on capital trying to compete with the incumbent telecommunications company Telefonica.  Orange is strong in France and has growing operations in Africa and the Middle East. Orange also has operations in Belgium, Poland, Luxemburg, Moldava, Romania and Slovakia. ORAN is attempting to merge its Spanish operations with MasMovil, subject to regulatory approval, which may rationalize the competitive market in Spain, at least to some meaningful decree.  ORANGE and MASMOVIL sign an agreement to combine their operations in Spain (7/23/22) 

Morningstar (7/8/22): 4 stars with a FV of US$14.5 and no moat. 

S&P (8/8/22): 4 stars with a 12 month PT of US$12, reduced from $14.  

Goal: Harvest one or two dividend payments and to sell at a 2%+ annualized profit. 

3. Small Ball

A. Bought 5 HTBK at $11.8


Quote: Heritage Commerce Corp.

"Heritage Commerce Corp, a bank holding company established in October 1997, is the parent company of Heritage Bank of Commerce, established in 1994 and headquartered in San Jose, CA with full-service branches in Danville, Fremont, Gilroy, Hollister, Livermore, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Morgan Hill, Oakland, Palo Alto, Pleasanton, Redwood City, San Francisco, San Jose, San Mateo, San Rafael, Sunnyvale, and Walnut Creek. Heritage Bank of Commerce is an SBA Preferred Lender. Bay View Funding, a subsidiary of Heritage Bank of Commerce, is based in San Jose, CA and provides business-essential working capital factoring financing to various industries throughout the United States."

HTBK SEC Filings

HTBK Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

10-Q for the Q/E 6/30/22 

2021 Annual Report 

Last DiscussedItem # 1.N. Added to HTBK - Bought 10 at $11.1 (7/2/21 Post) 

Last Substantive DiscussionItem # 1.L. Bought 10 HTBK at $11.52 (6/25/21 Post)

Average cost per share this account: $11.41 (25 shares)

Dividend: Quarterly at $.13 per share ($.52 annually)

Yield at AC = 4.56%

Last Ex Dividend: 8/10/22 (owned all as of)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Earnings Press Release 

Comparisons are to the 2021 second quarter. 

E.P.S. = $.24, up from $.15

Consensus at $.23 

NIM = 3.38%, up from 3%

Efficiency Ratio: 52.73%

NPL Ratio: .09%, down from .22%

NPA Ratio: .05%, down from .09%

Charge Off Ratio = Net recovery of $2.9M 

The NPL, NPA, and Charge Off ratios are not consistent with a ongoing recession in the second quarter. 

Coverage Ratio = 1,171.18% (allowance for loan losses to NPLs)

Loan to Deposit Ratio: 66.81%

Non-Interest Bearing Deposits to Total Deposits: 40.02%

ROE = 9.86%

ROTE = 14.06%

ROA = 1.1%

Total Capital Ratio = 14.6%

Tangible Book value per share = $7.04, up from $6.65

B. Added 5 DEA at $18.77

Quote: Easterly Government Properties Inc. (DEA) 

DEA SEC Filings

Easterly Government Properties Inc Profile-Reuters

Website: Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

Properties | Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

Investment Category: Equity REIT Common and Preferred Stock Basket Strategy

Last Buy Discussions Item # 2.K. Added to DEA - Bought 5 at $18.45 (5/12/22 Post)Item # 4.A. Added to DEA - Bought 10 at $20.4 (2/24/22 Post)Item # 3.B. Added 5 DEA at $20.76-Fidelity Taxable Account (10/8/21 Post)

Average Cost per share this account: $20.08  (70 shares)

Dividend: Quarterly at $.265 per share ($1.06 annually)

DEA Dividend History | Nasdaq

Yield at AC = 5.28%

Last Ex Dividend:  8/10/22  (owned all as of) 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Press Release and SEC Filed Supplemental Package 

Adjusted FFO per share: $.33

CAD per share: $.288


CAD - Cash Available for Distribution

A failure to cover the dividend with CAD could lead to a dividend cut. 

DEA is an Office REIT which will generally have significant quarterly outlays for routine maintenance and contractual tenant improvement expenses. Those expenditures are not available to support the dividend and are deducted from FFO when calculating CAD.  

Sell DiscussionsItem # 2.M. Pared DEA in Fidelity Taxable Account- Sold 12+ at $23.01 (1/13/22 Post)Item # 3.E. Pared DEA in Fidelity Taxable-Sold 10 at $22.92 (8/20/21 Post); Item # 1.A. Sold 21+ DEA at $28.81 (6/6/20 Post)(profit snapshot = $272.6)Item # 3.A. Sold 10 DEA at $22.39 (11/20/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $47.24); Items 1.A. and 1.B. Sold 10 DEA at $19.81 and Eliminated DEA in Schwab Account at $19.81 (8/24/19 Post)(profit snapshots $74.38)Sold 10 DEA at $21.44-Used Commission Free Trade (5/17/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $22.59)Item 5. A. Sold 50 DEA at $21.59-Used Commission Free Trade (12/11/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $97.85)

DEA Realized Gains to Date$561.84

Goal: Very modest at dividend + annual realized gains of 2%+ before ROC adjustments to the cost basis. Will consider selling highest cost lots when and if the price exceeds $22. 

C. Added 5 NWFL at $25.05



"Norwood Financial Corp is the parent company of Wayne Bank, which operates from fourteen offices throughout Northeastern Pennsylvania and fifteen offices in Delaware, Sullivan, Ontario, Otsego and Yates Counties, New York." 

5 Year Financial Data: 


2021 Annual Report at page 10 


Investment CategoryRegional Bank Basket Strategy

Average cost per share: $25.35 (15 shares)

Dividend: Quarterly at $.28 per share, last raised from $.26 effective for the 2022 first quarter payment. 

Norwood Financial Corp. Dividend History-Nasdaq

Yield at $25.35 = 4.42%

Last Ex Dividend: 7/14/22 (owned 10 shares as of)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Press Release 

Comparisons are to the 2021 second quarter: 

E.P.S. = $.84, up from $.70

NIM = 3.49%, up from 3.44%  

NPL Ratio = .04%, down from .28%

NPA Ratio = .05%, down from .24%

Charge off ratio: Net recovery

ROA = 1.35%, up from 1.15%

ROE = 15.19%, up from 11.59%

Tangible Book Value per share = $18.02

ROTE = 18.16%, up from 13.63%

D. Pared OFS in Fidelity Taxable - Sold 13.82 at $11.32

Quote: OFS Capital Corp- Mini Cap BDC

OFS SEC Filings

2021 Annual Report (risk factor summary starts at page 29 and ends at page 63)

Website: Homepage - OFS Capital

Management: External

Profit Snapshot: $62.43 (8/9/22 sale only)

Average cost per share this account before pare: $4.49

Average cost per share this account after pare: $4.08 (76+ shares)

Snapshot Intraday on 8/9/22 after pare

Dividend: Quarterly at $.29 per share (regular only)

OFS Dividend History | Nasdaq

Recent dividend history has the penny rate moving back up after being slashed from $.34 to $.17 effective for the 2020 second quarter payment.

Yield at New AC of $4.08 this account = 28.43% (assumes continuation of the current dividend rate)

Next Ex Dividend Date: 9/22/22 

5 year Chart: The remaining shares in this account were bought during the pandemic meltdown phase. 

Intraday 8/9/22 Snapshot 

Net asset value per share history:

6/30/22:   $14.57 10/Q for the Q/E 6/30/22 at page 3 

03/31/21:  $11.96 10-Q at page 3 

12/21/20:  $11.85 10-K at page 69 

6/30/20:   $10.10
3/31/20:    $  9.71
12/31/19:   $12.46
9/30/19:    $12.74  
6/30/19:    $12.95   Page 2 10-Q
3/31/19      $13.04   10-Q
12/31/18    $13.10
6/30/18     $13.70
03/31/18   $13.67
12/31/17    $14.12
12/31/16    $14.82
12/31/15    $14.76
12/31/14    $14.24
12/31/13    $14.54

IPO Offering Price at $15 (November 2012) with proceeds after the underwriters' discount at $13.05 Final Prospectus Supplement

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Press Release 

NII = $6.2M

NII per share = $.47

Adjusted NII per share = $.24 (deducts accrued and unpaid incentive fees "incentive" fees to external management company) 

Net asset value per share = $14.57, down from $15.52 as of 3/31/22, "primarily due to unrealized losses."

As of 6/30/22,  "based on fair value,  93% of the OFS loan portfolio "consisted of floating rate loans and 98% of our loan portfolio consisted of senior secured loans."

Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 3.F. Bought 40 OFS with an Average Cost Per share of $4.18 (11/7/20 Post)Item # 2.L. Added 5 OFS at $3.97-Fidelity Taxable (11/28/20 Post)Item # 1.K. Added 3 OFS at $4.5 -Fidelity Taxable (8/8/20 Post)Item # 3.E. Added 5 OFS at $9.66; 5 at $9.2; 5 at $8.7; 5 at $6; 5 at $5.65; 2 at $3.7; 10 at $3.79 (4/11/20 Post)

Last Sell DiscussionsItem # 4.B. Pared OFS in Fidelity Account - Sold 15.427 at $12.49 (6/15/22 Post)(profit snapshot = $60.07; contains snapshots of realized gains prior to 2022); Item # 1.H. Pared OFS in Fidelity Account Sold 35 at $10.07- Highest Cost Lots That Could be Sold Profitably (7/22/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $12.44); Item # 4.D. Pared OFS in Fidelity Account - Sold 29+ at $13.06 (4/21/22 Post)(profit snapshot = $69.88); Item # 2.M. Pared OFS in Vanguard Taxable-Sold 20 at $7.2 (12/25/20 Post)(profit snapshot = $56.8)Item # 3.B. Sold 10 OFS at $12.04 (11/30/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $7.04)Item # 4.B. Sold 60 shares at $12 (11/13/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $13.11); Item # 3.A. Sold Highest Cost OFS Lots in Schwab Account - 50 shares at $12.27 and 50 at $12.47 (5/5/19 Post)(profit snapshots = $69.55) 

OFS Realized Gains to Date: $414.55

Most of the gain is unrealized with positions held in several accounts.   

Goal: Any profit on the shares + the dividends.   

E. Added 4 RYLD at $21.21-Fidelity Account:

Quote: Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)

Sponsor's website: Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

This is a buy-write ETF using the Russell 2000 index. 

Last DiscussionsItem # 2.L. Bought 1 RYLD at $20.72-Fidelity Account (6/1/22 Post)Item # 2.I. Bought 5 RYLD at $22.48 - Fidelity Account  (2/10/22 Post)

Average cost per share this account: $22.57 (20 shares)

Dividend: Monthly at a variable rate. 

Nex Ex Dividend: 8/22/22

The yield shown at financial websites include a short term capital gain distribution of $.30656 paid on 1/7/22. 

Last 12 Dividend Payments through August = $2.8053 per share (excludes short term capital gain distribution)

Yield at AC = 12.43%, using the the $2.8053 annual number. 

Goal: Harvest the dividend and sell at any profit. 

F. Added 5 RYLD at $21.2- Schwab Account:

See Item # 2.D. above. 

G. Added 5 SNY at $46.6

Quote: Sanofi ADR

Current Position: 10 shares with an AC of $47.75.

I discussed SNY in my last post and nothing further to add here other than the following:  

I mentioned in a comment published on 8/11/22 that SNY was down almost 9%, primarily due to fears about the potential liabilities that may arise from litigation over Zantac, a heartburn drug. GlaxoSmithkline (GSK) and Pfizer (PFE) are also being sued. 

The claim is that Zantac can generate a chemical under certain conditions called Nitrosodimethylamine which is alleged to be a human carcinogen.  

The litigation has been ongoing for some time and is discussed in SNY's 2021 Annual report at page F-81 Annual Report

The sudden fear response was triggered by a Morgan Stanley analyst claiming the damages could possibly total $10.5B to $45B based on settlements for other drugs in the past. 

The litigation section  of major drug company annual reports is generally very long. No one can really assess what will happen in trials or the amount of damages that may ultimately be awarded by juries.  

The first Zantac trial starts later this month. If there is no settlement, it will be years before all of those trials end and the appeals process is exhausted by the losing party at trial. 

Reaction 'excessive' to Sanofi's upcoming litigation: analysts

Another recent development that is pressuring the stock is a hold placed on a trial of SNY's multiple sclerosis. Tolebrutinib clinical trial program update - Sanofi

Maximum Position: 20 shares with each subsequent purchase having to be at the lowest price in the chain. 

H. Bought 14 Shares MATV at Multiple Prices - Schwab Account

Quote: Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV) 

"The Company offers a wide range of critical components and engineered solutions to solve our customers’ most complex challenges. With over 7,500 employees worldwide, we manufacture on four continents and generate sales in more than 100 countries. The Company’s two operating segments, Advanced Technical Materials and Fiber-Based Solutions, target premium applications across diversified and growing end-markets, from filtration to healthcare to sustainable packaging. Our broad portfolio of technologies combines polymers, fibers, and resins to optimize the performance of our customers’ products across multiple stages of the value chain." 

Mativ was created on 7/7/22 through the combination of Neenah Papers and  Schweitzer-Mauduit International. 

MATV Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

Average Cost per share this account = $20.96

Dividend: Quarterly at $.40

Yield at $20.96 = 7.63%

Next Ex Dividend: 8/18/22

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Press Release 

The combination of Neenah Papers and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. was completed on 7/6/22. SWM and Neenah Complete Merger to Become Mativ, a ~$3 Billion Global Leader in Specialty Materials This reports provides information for those companies as separate entities through 6/30/22. 

SWM: Organic revenue growth of 11%; GAAP E.P.S. = $.36; Non-GAAP E.P.S. = $.86)

Neenah Papers: Organic revenue growth of 17%;  GAAP operating income at $17M; "Adjusted EBITDA increased 14% to $36.2 million; price increases more than offset higher input costs":

SWM YTD Non-GAAP Per Share Adjustments: 

I. Bought 10 CIZN at $17.45

Quote:  Citizens Holding Co. (CIZN)

"Citizens Holding Company (the “Company”) is a one-bank holding company and the parent company of The Citizens Bank of Philadelphia (the “Bank”), both headquartered in Philadelphia, Mississippi. The Bank currently has twenty-eight banking locations in fourteen counties in East Central, North, and South Mississippi."

The market cap at $17.45 is about $99+M. 

CIZN SEC Filings

Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy (primarily viewed as a bond substitute) 

Last EliminationItem # 2.L. Eliminated CIZN -Sold 25 at $19.06 n(4/7/22 Post) 

Dividend: Quarterly at $.24 per share, last raised from $.23 effective for the 2015 4th quarter payment. 

CIZN Dividend History | Nasdaq

Yield at $17.45 = 5.5

Last Ex Dividend: 6/15/22

CIZN owns its main office and 26 of its 28 branch offices. 10-K at pp. 25-27. 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): 10-Q

This is a better than totally lackluster report IMO which is the norm for this bank holding company.  

Comparisons are to the 2021 second quarter. 

E.P.S. = $.45, up from $.34

Net Income = $2.541M

NIM = 2.78%, up from 2.57%. 

NPL Ratio: .84%

Coverage Ratio = 138.47%

Charge off ratio: net recovery of $214K. 

Total Capital Ratio = 13.32% (Holding company level) 

Goal: As with other bond substitutes, the total return goal is harvesting dividend and selling the stock at more than a 2% annualized gain. 

CIZN Realized Gains to Date: $435.89

Almost all of that profit originated from trades made in 2011 and 2015: 


Consider to sell range: $19-$20. 

J. Pared OHI in Fidelity Taxable - Sold Highest Cost 6 Shares at $33.11


Map of Our Locations (921 facilities; 63 Operators)

2021 Annual Report (risk factor summary starts at page 16 and ends at page 30)

Omega owns nursing homes and senior living facilities. Those are generally the highest risk properties that a REIT can own. Over many years, owners of those facilities have had to deal with a significant number of operator bankruptcies and inability to pay rent when due. 

Profit Snapshot: +$2.72



AC per share before pare this account: $29.62

AC per share after pare: $28.44

Dividend: Quarterly at $.67 per share ($2.68 annually)

Dividends – Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.

Yield at $28.44 = 9.42%

Last Ex Dividend: 7/29/22 (owned all as of)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Press Release 

There are a lot of cash flow numbers in this report that include and exclude certain items. The most relevant cash flow number IMO is FAD (Funds Available for Distribution). The issue is whether the dividend is comfortably covered by FAD. 

OHI does not provide a FAD per share number but does show FAD at $172.106M. Dividing that number by 243M weighted average common shares outstanding during the quarter, the FAD per share number is $.708. While the dividend is covered by FAD, I would not describe the cushion as comfortable. 

During the second quarter, OHI repurchased 4.2M shares for $115M. 

OHI sold 13 facilities for $54M in cash, generating a tax profit of $25M. I would assume that $25M profit is after the depreciation adjustment to the tax cost basis and consequently is not a real profit number based on the original cost plus capital improvements.    

Review of the operator update section is important for nursing home REITs. 

Sell Discussions Starting in 2017 Item # 3.C. Eliminated OHI-Sold 26 at $31.44 (6/25/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $115.71); Item # 1.C. Sold 31 OHI at $30.13 (6/7/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $41.01); Item # 6 Sold 100 OHI at $37.38 - Update For Equity REIT Basket Strategy As Of 8/27/16 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha (profit snapshot = $117.60); Item # 6 Sold 39 Shares at $32.56  (10/5/17 Post)(profit snapshot $63.64); Item #5.A. Sold 107 OHI at $34.55 (7/15/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $211.51); Item 2.A. Sold 52+ OHI at $33.6-Eliminated Position in Roth IRA account  (5/8/17 Post)(profit snapshot = $66.63) 

The largest gain was in 2016:
101+ Shares +$887.91 

This sale was not discussed since I did not publish blogs between September -December 2016. I did mention this transaction in a comment published on 9/7/16. Seeking Alpha

OHI Realized Gains to Date: $1,506.23

I view my OHI past trading history as good given the difficulty in generating profits on the shares. 

5 year chart as of 8/12/22: 

K. Eliminated BMRN - Sold 2+ at $94.94

Quote: BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

I would label BMRN a successful, so far, drug company in developing treatments for rare chronic diseases.  

The most recent rally in the stock price is based primarily IMO on increased optimism that Europe will soon approve conditional marketing for Roctavin, a gene therapy for hemophilia A. There is reason for optimism as discussed in this article. BioMarin's hemophilia gene therapy 


As previously discussed, BMRN suffered a major setback when the FDA refused to grant marketing approval back in 2020, wanting more studies.  

Profit Snapshot: $44.18

Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 2.K. Added 1 BMRN at $75.68- Fidelity Taxable Account (6/9/22 Post)Item # 2.E. Started BMRN as a Placeholder- Bough 2 at $77.65 in Vanguard Account; 1 at $77.55 (Fidelity); 2 at  $76.95-Schwab Account(6/12/21 Post)

Last DiscussedItem # 2.C. Eliminated BMRN in Vanguard Taxable Account - Sold 4 at $89.25 (7/22/22 Post)(profit snapshots = $47.7) I discussed the 2022 first quarter report in that post. 

Dividend: None and none expected. 

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): 

BMRN's GAAP earnings do not support the current stock price. The hope is that future earnings will.  

GAAP Net Income per share = $.15

Non-GAAP E.P.S.  = $.58


Includes Product Revenues

One reason for the low GAAP E.P.S. is continuing expenditures on R&D which may or may not prove to be rewarding to shareholders. 

Total R&D Expenses 2nd Q: $158.2M

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP: The largest addition to GAAP is share compensation, which I am generally unwilling to ignore as an expense item. 

Analyst Reports (available to Schwab customers)

Morningstar (8/5/22): 4 stars with a FV of $105 and a narrow moat.  

Credit Suisse (8/3/22): Outperform with a 12 month PT of $111, raised from $107 in response to the 2nd quarter earnings report. Raised 2022 non-GAAP E.P.S. estimate to $1.96 from $1.89 based on better than expected revenues from the recently launched Voxzogo ($34M in revenues), a treatment for Achondroplasia

S&P (8/14/22): 4 stars with a 12 month PT of $105. Increased 2022 Non-GAAP estimate to $2.16 form $2.11 and reduced the 2023 Non-GAAP E.P.S. estimate to $4.19 from $4.25.   

My impression developed over the years is that the Stock Jocks just accept non-GAAP E.P.S. numbers and consensus forward estimates when assigning a P/E multiple. Ignoring the non-GAAP E.P.S. estimates and using only GAAP numbers would produce a far lower price. 

For BMRN, the stock price will depend on what the EU and FDA ultimately do with Roctavin. Even if the EU approves this gene therapy for marketing, the stock price will likely be slammed when and if the FDA refuses to do so. 

2022 BRMN Trading Profits to Date: $91.88 (6+ shares)

L. Pared BHB in Fidelity Sold 5 of 45 at $30

This was part of my highest cost lot. 

BHB "is the parent company of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust. Founded in 1887, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust . . . provides full-service community banking with office locations in all three Northern New England states of Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont."

The "principal executive office is in a building owned by the Company located at 82 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine. The Bank provides full-banking services at 53 locations throughout Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, of which 33 are owned and 20 are leased." 2021 Annual Report at page 28 

Quote: Bar Harbor Bankshares (BHB)

BHB SEC Filings

Bar Harbor Bankshares Analyst Estimates | MarketWatch

Investment Category: Regional Bank Basket Strategy

Last Buy DiscussionsItem # 2. Restarted BHB in Schwab Taxable Account-Bought 5 at $26.6; 5 at $25.55 (9/17/21 Post)Item # 1.D. Added to BHB-Bought 2 at $22.75; 5 at $21.5 (2/20/21 Post)Item # 2.D. Added to BHB-Bought 5 at $17.5; 5 at $14; 2 at $13.8; 2 at $13.5 (5/2/2020 Post)

Profit Snapshot  = $38.58

New Average Cost per share this account: $19 (40 shares)

Snapshot Intraday on 8/15/22 after pare

Dividend: Quarterly at $.26 per share ($1.04 annually)

Yield at $19: 5.4737%

Last Ex Dividend: 8/15/22 (sold on)

Last Earnings Report (Q/E 6/30/22): SEC Filed Press Release and 10-Q for the Q/E 6/30/22 

Comparisons are to the 2021 second quarter. 

E.P.S. = $.70, up from $.60 

NIM = 3.19%, up from 2.79%  

Efficiency Ratio: 59%, down from 63% (down is good)

NPL Ratio  = .21%, down from .54% (")

NPA Ratio = .21%, down from .37% (") 

Charge Off Ratio : Net Recovery of $37K 

ROTE = 15.74%, up from 12.91%

ROA = 1.14% 

11% Annualized Loan Growth

9% Annualized Deposit Growth 

Some Sell DiscussionsItem # 3.E. Pared BHB in Fidelity Account - Sold 2 at $31.5 (12/16/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $18.43); Item # 1.I. Pared BHB-Sold 10 at $28.5 and 5 at $30.5-highest cost lots in Fidelity Taxable Account (3/20/21 Post)(profit snapshot = $95.46)Item # 3.A. Pared BHB-Sold 40 at $24.48-highest cost lots in Fidelity taxable account (12/5/20 Post)(profit snapshot = $38.17)Item # 3.B. Eliminated BHB-Sold 54+ Shares at $26.34 (5/18/19 Post)(profit snapshot = $131.1)Item # 1.A. Sold 100 BHB at $30.69-Used Commission Free Trade (7/15/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $1,718.56Item # 1.A. Sold 50 BHB at $30.02 (5/21/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $666.96)Item #3.A. Sold 100 BHB at $29.55 (4/26/18 Post)(profit snapshot = $682.94Item # 1. A. Sold 30 BHB at $29.42 (3/25/18 Post)Sold 100 BHB Update For Regional Bank Basket Strategy As Of 5/6/2016 - South Gent | Seeking Alpha (profit snapshot = $936.96)

BHB Realized Gains to Date: $4,445.1 (my largest gain in my regional bank basket strategy)

I will consider reducing or eliminating my position in the $30-$35 range. I own some shares in other accounts. 

DisclaimerI am not a financial advisor, but simply an individual investor who has been managing my own money since I was a teenager. In this post, I am acting solely as a financial journalist focusing on my own investments. The information contained in this post is not intended to be a complete description or summary of all available data relevant to making an investment decision. Instead, I am merely expressing some of the reasons underlying the purchase or sale of securities. Nothing in this post is intended to constitute investment or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or to sell. All investors need to perform their own due diligence before making any financial decision which requires at a minimum reading original source material available at the SEC and elsewhere. A failure to perform due diligence only increases what I call "error creep". Stocks, Bonds & Politics: ERROR CREEP and the INVESTING PROCESS Each investor needs to assess a potential investment taking into account their personal risk tolerances, goals, and situational risks. I can only make that kind of assessment for myself and my family members. 

40 comments:

  1. I added some information about the Arizona Public Service SU bond. APS is the largest electric utility in Arizona and the most important subsidiary of Pinnacle West (PNW).

    Crude oil prices are continuing today their dominant downtrend which lends some support to the inflation has already peaked thesis.

    Crude Oil WTI (NYM $/bbl) Front Month
    $86.13 -$3.28 -3.67%
    Last Updated: Aug 16, 2022 at 2:16 p.m. EDT
    https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/future/crude%20oil%20-%20electronic?mod=home-page

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Inflation may well have peeked. I'm not convinced that avoids a recession. There's rate hikes still to come... can't just depend on inflation to get all the way down to 2% on it's own.

      The effects of the hikes so far, isn't fully in the economy yet by any stretch.

      Delete
  2. Isn't that the first negative manufacturing index (NY) in many years? (Except a few in oil states in late 2018).

    That seems like it should be a big deal?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: The regional manufacturing indexes can fall into negative territory during an economic expansion due to a variety of temporary factors. One of those factors may be the strength of the USD that makes U.S. products less competitive for foreign buyers.

      This link has a chart of the NY FED Empire State manufacturing index going back to 2001:
      https://www.newyorkfed.org/survey/empire/empiresurvey_overview

      For the regional indexes, any number below zero indicates a contraction.

      The new order component plunged to -29.6% from +6.2% in July.

      I will pay more attention to the national manufacturing indexes compiled by ISM and Markit.

      The last ISM report was for July and the index was at 52.8%, down from 53% in June, with the new order component falling to 48. For this index any number below 50 indicates a contraction in activity.

      https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2022/08/01/ism-manufacturing-index-slower-expansion-in-july

      Delete
    2. So the regionals can vary more than the collective of the country. Similar to 2018 when oil country suffered.

      Delete
  3. Got the CT-PET day before yesterday and the meds are still working. Spleen size is down some more. Just under 11cm at it's longest, which is officially normal. For my age & gender, the average is 9.7 or 10. So it has a tad more to go.

    I'm starting to have blurry vision from the Revlimid when working on the computer, maybe even cataracts starting. So I"m anxious to get size down, and be able to argue to go off the drug early. But alas, not till next quarter's CT.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I haven't been looking at the Schwab market update emails. Happened to looked at the recent one, and found convincing arguments.

    So 1st judging the source: Do big brokers try to be accurate so they aren't embarrassed by bad predictions? Or do they try to influence the market in the direction they need?

    Points made:
    "Growing payrolls and recessions aren’t mutually exclusive. There is historical precedent—like in the early 1970s—for continued job growth well after the start of a recession."

    "The Conference Board's Leading Economic Index (LEI) has fallen by nearly 2% over the past six months. Excluding the reaction to the pandemic, LEI hasn’t stumbled like this since August 2009. Such a decline is also consistent with prior periods when the economy was entering a recession." (With chart.)

    "It is critical to differentiate between leading and coincident economic indicators. The former—such as job-cut announcements and claims for unemployment insurance—are sending recession warnings. That has always occurred before payrolls—a coincident indicator—turned lower."

    The counters I see are convincing about breadth indicators pointing to the end of a pullback.

    https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/market-perspective?cmp=em-XCS

    ReplyDelete
  5. 3M's issued an offer. You can trade shares for SpinCo that immediately becomes NeoGen.

    It's at a 7% gain premium, but determined by market values in the 3 days before conversion. So it could be any price.

    NeoGen has no divs, neg earnings this year -20.3%, and a falling knife chart that hasn't bounced with this rally. PE 47 (in Finviz).

    I have 10 shares of 3M down 28%. I'd love to trade out of that. But this doesn't seem like the way.

    There's something about if the offer isn't fully jumped into, the leftover shares will be distributed to 3M holders.

    https://investors.3m.com/news/news-details/2022/3M-Commences-Split-Off-Exchange-Offer-for-Food-Safety-Business/default.aspx

    https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=NEOG&p=w&tas=0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: I generally have an unfavorable opinion about MMM which is why I am gradually working my way up to 2 shares. The potential environmental remediation and litigation exposure is one reason. Another is that I do not care for financial engineering through spinoffs.

      The food safety business which will be combined with Neogen is part of the Health care division which generated $2.179B in revenues in the 2022 2nd Q. MMM intends to spin off what remains of this division by year end 2023.

      10-Q at pages 10 and 52
      https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/66740/000006674022000065/mmm-20220630.htm

      If I could stop all of this, I would.

      I have no interest in owning Neogen. But, if if the exchange for MMM shares is not full subscribed, I will receive a cash in lieu of the Neogen shares since I would receive less than 1 share.

      Delete
    2. I'll ignore. If I get a few shares from the offer not being fully subscribed, I'll sell.

      What brokers are allowing partial share buys? Ameritrade and Vang don't seem to. I have a Schwab account for the reports.

      Delete
    3. With $2.179B in revenues, seems like MMM should hold onto that for a while, to pay off the lawsuit issues.

      Delete
    4. Land: When an investor would be entitled to receive a fractional share, either through a merger involving a share exchange or a spinoff, the fractional share will generally be liquidated before it reaches the broker.

      Fidelity allows for fractional share purchases. An investor can enter a dollar amount rather than the number of shares which results in fractional share purchases.

      Schwab allows for fractional share purchases of S & P 500 stocks.

      https://www.schwab.com/fractional-shares-stock-slices

      With Fidelity, I can just select dollar amount on my order ticket.

      With Schwab, I have to click the Trade tab and then click "Schwab Stock Slices". This will take me to a list of companies where I can buy a dollar amount. I check the boxes for stocks that I wish to buy. I am then taken to page where I select a dollar amount, which will be applied to all of the stocks selected.

      I do not use Schwab for this kind of trade since Fidelity is easier and covers as far as I can tell every U.S. exchange traded security.

      Vanguard does not allow.

      Delete
    5. Thanks for the details!

      Maybe I'll venture into Interactive Brokers, as long as I'd need to open yet another account. Or Fidelity.

      https://www.bankrate.com/investing/best-brokers-fractional-share-investing/

      Delete
  6. I've met with several advisors now. So far it's been a waste. My question: Using a best performance portfolio arrangement, what yearly income does my portfolio translate into?

    I wanted to learn what factors the industry is using as their standards for these calculations. What distribution methods and portfolio arrangements instead of the traditional 60/40 with 4% withdrawal a year.

    Do they really need to find out "my dreams for retirement," "salary I'll need to meet my dreams", and how I feel about a long list of person topics, especially "fears".... to answer that question?

    Nope!

    So far answers are:
    - We'll meet for the 3rd time and tell you then. This is just info gathering.
    - So how much is your risk tolerance. (Me: I don't care, what's the best arrangement.) So we'll work on smoothing out volatility. (Me to myself: No please, I don't care about that!)
    - So what's your longevity worry? (Me: Use whatever age you think is best.) followed by (Me: wearing out after repeating it 8 times.)
    - So can you handle if we're managing your money and you aren't touching it? (Me to myself: Yes, but not with your firm.)

    And the other firm: Only 42% chance of an income I didn't ask about, using numbers entered incorrectly. But it will be 95% likely to get that income if you buy our annuity.
    Say for instance if you get a 6% annuity with downside protection... (Me: There's 6% annuities available?) Reply: Distracting off onto other topics. (Me to myself: Of course there aren't.)

    I may yet get good info, but so far it hasn't given even tiny bits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Facebook is now flooding me with ads. Phoenix Investing Group says it provides 11% return year after year. Hum, where have I heard that before?

      Delete
  7. They are starting to eat their own

    https://thehill.com/homenews/3610114-trump-accuses-crazy-former-transportation-secretary-elaine-chao-of-trying-to-get-rich-on-china/amp/

    ----

    Late night snack, and I got treated to an infomercial by Huckabee for a sleep aid. Arkansas former Governor has he put it, doesn't look recognizable to me.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Land: Part of Trump's psychopathic behavior is his venomous assaults on any Republican who does not show 100% servile fealty to him.

      Trump's endorsements are not based on a careful assessment of who might be able to beat a democrat incumbent but on who is the most servile person running in the republican primary who parrots Trump's talking points, lies and false statements; who shows 100% loyalty to Trump; who effusively praises him; and who never criticizes him no matter what he does. In other words, what you would expect in an authoritarian political system.

      Delete
    2. That's McConnell's complaints! For some reason McConnell deems it worth saying out loud in earshot of Trump. ...Which is obviously not the king autocrat worshiping behavior that Trump demands.

      Delete
  8. I recently mentioned that I had caught up discussing my stock purchases. For my next post, I do not currently have a stock purchase to discuss. Insead, I have only pared NYCB and eliminated CTT.

    I am about 2 months behind in identifying my bond purchases which is one reason for discussing some in out of time order.

    This year's decline in stocks was simply not sufficient for me to take on more equity risk when investment grade corporate bonds and treasuries provide more than sufficient income to meet my financial objectives.

    And, while inflation pressures from commodity prices have eased, I am still concerned about whether the FED has allowed problematic inflation to become deeply rooted in the economy.

    The rally off the recent lows made it even more unlikely that I will take on equity risk.

    I am participating in today's 3 month treasury bill auction and tomorrow's 2 year year treasury note auction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So if inflation comes down, you'd think a soft landing is possible?

      I finally got my Dad to transfer money to an online back with 2% interest. Well, I did most of the effort. Next step is to start talking about bonds and bills for the pocket he won't be needed soon. He doesn't want a long commitment because it's unclear which way the economy and with it rates, are going.

      Delete
    2. Land: So far, the economic data is consistent with a major slowdown, partly due to the U.S. economy simply being too large to sustain the robust 2021 GDP growth rate and primarily due to problematic inflation restraining consumer discretionary spending in an economy substantially dependent on consumer spending.

      A soft landing is possible and the move down in commodity price makes that more likely. Problematic inflation is still present and will be a significant headwind in resuming real GDP growth.

      Presently, there is some economic data that is consistent with a soft landing but there is meaningful data that points to hard one on the horizon as well. So, bottom line, it is not clear yet.

      Delete
    3. Sigh. Unclear - and not even a wall of fake worry.

      The debt relief from today isn't a great move, but hopefully it means loan payments will slow over time, not be immediate money to help inflation increase.

      Delete
  9. The VIX is in what I call an Unstable Vix Pattern (UVP). In a phase 1 UVP, the VIX is in a whipsaw pattern moving into the high 20s or 30s and then back down to below 20. Most of the movement will be between 20-30. The move down to below 20 occurs in conjunction with a rally in the S & P 500, while the surge back into the high 20s or 30 would be accompanied by a decline.

    The VIX did manage 4 closes below 20 in August starting at 19.53 (8/12) and ending with a 19.56 close on 8/18.

    The VIX is currently trading at 23.1, up 12.14%.

    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EVIX/history?p=%5EVIX

    I started to discuss my Vix model in a May 2009 post, though I was discussing the model in emails as early as the 2007 Spring.

    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2009/05/vix-asset-allocation-model-explained.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I still like this model very much.

      If I remember correctly, the VIX never moved out of Unstable pattern after 2020's bear.

      It's unclear whether the catastrophic phase is still coming or it's been done. (Or factors move the market out of the unstable mode first.)

      Delete
    2. Land: The VIX movement in March 2020 was both consistent with a Trigger Event and a Phase 2 UVP.

      The VIX was in a SVP.
      There was an "Alert" when the VIX closed at 25.03 (2/24/20) after a prior close at 17.08.

      That kind of movement after weeks of movement below 20 can not be dismissed lightly.

      The VIX then went into both a Trigger Event and directly into a Catastrophic Phase 2 UVP. The highest close was at 82.69 (3/16/20), but other closes were consistent with the Phase 2 pattern.

      I buy into those huge VIX spikes and then start lightening up again when the VIX moves below 20 which started in late March 2021.

      The VIX movement below 20 starting on 3/24/21 through 9/17/21 did not strictly satisfy the historical definition of a SVP formation but came very close at about 76 closes below 20 before popping out with a close at 28.62 (11/26/21), up from 18.58 the prior day. Again, that kind of percentage 1 day move can not be dismissed.

      There were some moves slightly above 20 during that 2021 dominant below 20 movement that did not require the day count for a SVP formation to start over.

      However, the pop on 11/26/21, confirmed by subsequent closes, ended the day count and started a resurgence period of the VIX movement consistent with the UVP whipsaw pattern.

      I do not currently see any reason to predict that a long term SVP will form, at least until it becomes clear that the economic slowdown has ended and problematic inflation is trending down sufficiently that the Stock Jocks are no longer concerned about the FED going so far in raising interest rates that it strangles the economy.

      Delete
    3. Late 2021, sticking with the model strictly would have worked since it wouldn't point to an all clear - right before a big slow down. Second guessing it would have done poorly at least in the 6 months after.

      That 80 day count (or was it 90), was used because it fit in the past? It has that feel of when people are ready to move onto a new pattern and forget the past.

      I wish this inflation while dissipating could trigger a new pattern of ending the 0% rates that harms savers and seniors. The economy would benefit from heading back to normal rates. Also, there's less bubbles that way.

      Delete
    4. Land: The 90 trading day count is based on the historical record and basically covered all head fakes when the VIX moved below 20 and then burst back out in the typical UVP pattern.

      If my memory is accurate, I started using 3 months but that was not specific enough since I meant to exclude weekends and holidays.


      As to working, it depends on how the model is used. The timing indicator is broad, buying the dips and selling the rips.

      So I was buying into the March 2000 volatility spike and lightening up on moves below 20 and then adding during the next spike and so on. If a SVP forms, then I reduce my trading and hold onto positions longer. In a UVP, I am in a hyper trading mode.

      https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/434935-south-gent/3373095-vix-asset-allocation-model

      I did some small ball buying today. All of the purchases were REIT stocks.

      NVDA and CRM reports after the close are more indications of a slowdown.

      https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/24/nvidia-reports-slowing-growth-after-earlier-warning.html

      https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/24/salesforce-crm-earnings-q2-2023.html

      Delete
    5. In the prior comment, there is a typo. I bought the volatility spike in March 2020, not March 2000. I am keeping a fair amount of shares bought during March-April 2020, which is different than my approach to other major volatility events such as the shares bought in October 2008-2009, all of which have been sold.

      Delete
    6. Interesting stuff. I have to remember to be more active about trading during these times. (ex FB popped when I bought... but I didn't sell when there was no reason for a hold, and now well.)

      So 90 days was needed to get past fake heads. I had a typo: it was needed so far this time too.

      Is there a reason to keep more this time than in other events? ...Or it's just been longer since the prior so they've been sold.




      Delete
    7. Land: I am using the VIX Model as one guide for buying and selling.

      Assume a trader had no information other than VIX closes. Various trading systems could be constructed using the VIX movements.

      E.G.

      Hyper Trading: Pattern Defined as SVP before a Trigger Event but a substantial percentage spike in VIX has occurred from consistent below 20 movement.

      Buy SPY Vix Close Above 30
      Sell SPY VIX Close Below 20

      Buy and Hold = 102 points
      Hyper Trading = 156 points

      Buy 2/27/20 312
      Sell 2/12/21 393
      Buy 12/3/21 453
      Sell 12/8/21. 470
      Buy 1/25/22 434
      Sell 2/9/22. 457
      Buy. 2/23/22. 422
      Sell. 3/28/22 446
      Buy. 4/26/22 416
      Sell. 8/12/26. 427

      Alternatives to Hyper:

      Option # 2
      Buy: 10 trading days after close over 35 coming out of SVP with an obvious major and ongoing volatility spike consistent with a Trigger Event.

      Buy Again only after SVP formation or another major volatility spike after 5 closes of 35+.

      Keep if owned or buy after SVP formation until Recovery Period after Trigger Event.

      Sell after 10 consecutive days below 20

      Buy 3/12/20 248
      Sell 4/9/21 411
      Points: 163
      Currently out at 411. Waiting for SVP formation or 5 closes above 35.

      Delete
    8. I've seen you using the VIX these ways and it working.

      The hyper trading, I get 115 for buy and hold (427-312). Conceptually, it's riding the mini waves within the bigger market ride up. So it logically works.
      Visually the under 20 spike upward are never under the price for the last under 30 drop so that too verifies it.
      Downside is taxes on short term gains but higher tax on a gain is still a gain!

      Option #2
      Buy 10 days after 1st spike.
      Buy again 5 days into a 2nd spike if it happens.

      That's works. It's a good summary of capturing that initial shock that the market reacts to with an over 35. There does often seem to be a second one. Then the market gets used to the problem, and it's less consistent to count on for an over 35 spike.

      Sell under 20 fits with that.

      Keeping is an SVP forms instead of more volatility fits too.

      I'm not understanding the role of recovery period in holding or buying in Option #2
      "Keep if owned or buy after SVP formation until Recovery Period after Trigger Event. "

      ----

      But it brings up a 3rd Option you've mentioned before.

      Buying VIX's first spike over 35 after the Unstable Pattern has formed. Waiting for the Recovery Period to sell under 20 (it's gone under 20 but if nervous, there's still gain selling when it gets near 20. However with March 2020's drop, there was no end the recovery period rally and no SVP reformed!)

      There hasn't been a chance to put that into practice in a while. The market hasn't left

      ---
      Why the 10 days after and 5 days? Is that from backtesting? So it typically continues to climb for the 2 weeks after the 1st over 35 spike. And there's a shorter window on the 2nd over 35 spike if one happens.

      I'd backed tested the original model. I've been watching this go round and wondering about these spike moments; there seemed to be a pattern.

      One in particular is that after the disaster trigger, there's a lot of politician work to create stability and solve the problem. So those first spikes over 35 are unique.

      Interesting!!!

      Delete

    9. I need to listen to some recorded news I saved on the affidavit. At this point I'd guess it'll be more entertaining than SNL. Sounds like it squashes any excuse Trump could have. With his handwritten notes on the classified documents. How big was his handwriting?
      (And he needed daily updates in crayon pictures when it didn't include grifting.)

      A worrisome aspect is a CIA letter that it'd lost more operatives than usual (came out Oct 2021.)

      Delete
    10. Land: The affidavit is so heavily redacted that it primarily just informs the reader of the criminal statutes that may have been violated by one or more people.

      Trump went into one of his hissy fits, claiming there was no mention of nuclear weapons in the affidavit and that proved in TrumpWorld that the Fake News media was just out to get him when publishing stories that there were top secret documents containing that kind of information in a Hotel's storage room.

      https://news.yahoo.com/trump-reacts-mar-lago-affidavit-182955050.html

      While that argument appeals to Trumpsters, the substantive content of the affidavit was redacted as Trump knows.

      Trump's legal team did not request in a court filing or appearance before the Magistrate that the affidavit be released in its entirety. There is a good reason why they did not so advocate, which will be revealed in the fullness of time.

      Trump has publicly shared classified information with the Russian ambassador while being taped in the Oval Office.

      https://www.npr.org/2017/05/15/528511980/report-trump-gave-classified-information-to-russians-during-white-house-visit

      Biden has correctly cut him off from receiving any classified information.
      https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/05/politics/biden-trump-intelligence-briefing/index.html

      Delete
    11. Land: The reference to a Recovery Period is that the hyper trading executed during the UVP would cease when a SVP forms with the next sell signal being during a Recovery Period after the Trigger Events ends the SVP and restarts the UVP again.


      Option # 2 had only 1 trade and is currently waiting for a buy signal, either 5 days over 35 closes. or a SVP formation.

      The whipsaw pattern in the UVP does not have a time period between VIX spikes and returns to below 20 movement, other than the 90 day count for the SVP formation. The VIX may meander below 20 for a week, a month or 70 days before spiking again. The Option #1 tries to catch those whipsaw patterns and could generate a large number of trades. Even though the VIX rose 17.36% last Friday, the close was at 25.56 which did not trigger a buy under Option # 1.

      I listed only 2 options but a wide variety of them can be formulated as one guide to trading.

      Delete
    12. Ah, I understand better.

      And the recovery period could be years later after a SVP formed, and when the next rocky period starts.

      I'll have to put some thought into the patterns and see what one's I'd like to play with.

      ---

      Been assuring myself that if I miss this slide and my money stays out of the market, I will still catch market gains by putting my 60% back in the market, once a SVP finally forms.

      It's impossible to read a lot of this market. But the VIX does well at reflecting what more active investors are thinking as they play options...

      ---
      I noticed, the recent bill includes a minimum tax on corporations. While it's unlikely to effect the bigger companies that make it into the market that I'd buy, it sits in the drag on the economy ledger side. Even if it's not much, big money is likely to see it as a new corporate tax and mattering.

      Delete
    13. Trump is tiresome. No mention of nuclear, but most of it's black.

      I remember that early leak of classified info. It demonstrates his understanding of the value of the material so well. He's probably been fomenting this plan since he took office.

      The affidavit implies multiple people are squealing on him. One can only hope.

      So much of how this goes depends on voters, what remains blue or goes red. Maybe Cheney can siphon off enough votes to make it easier.

      Delete
    14. Land: I use descriptive phrases to identify specific historical Vix movements. The "Recovery Period" is when the VIX returns to below 20 movement after either a Trigger Event or a Confirmation Event which is similar to the Trigger Event and confirms the existence of the UVP and the validity of the Trigger Event signal.


      After the August 2007 Trigger Event, there was a brief Recovery Period, with the S&P rising to new highs in October. There was a Confirmation Event in November 2007, followed by a very brief Recovery Period in December, followed by another Confirmation Event in January 2008 with no Recovery Period; another Confirmation Event in March 2008 followed by a Recovery Period starting in late April; and then the last Confirmation Event in July 2008 before the Catastrophic Event with only a few days in the Recovery Period.

      Delete
  10. Can you comment on this legal opinion in the Wall Street Journal regarding the Presidential Records Act and the legality of Trump's possession of the documents sought under the FBI warrant? Thanks.
    https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-trump-warrant-had-no-legal-basis-mar-a-lago-affidavit-presidential-records-act-archivist-custody-classified-fbi-garland-11661170684

    ReplyDelete
  11. Cathie: I no longer subscribe to the WSJ but I found the article here:
    http://davidbrivkin.com/tag/lee-a-casey/

    I would describe the authors as far right and their arguments as frivolous.

    The warrant was not based on the Presidential Records Act but three criminal statutes including one that deals with obstruction of justice. I surmise that that the obstruction statute was cited due to Trump's failure to return the documents pursuant to a grand jury subpoena.

    These 2 lawyers apparently have the Presidential Records Act nullifying the criminal statutes which is just nonsense.

    The Presidential Records Act is clear that those documents needed to be turned over to the National Archives as soon as Trump left office. The fact that Trump has access to those documents held by the National Archives {42 U.S.C. §2205 (3)} is not tantamount to an authorization to retaining possession of them.

    Summary of PRA:
    https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html

    PRA Statute:
    42 U.S.C. §2203(g)(1): "Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President."
    https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/presidential-records.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have published a new post:
    https://tennesseeindependent.blogspot.com/2022/08/ctt-enb-nycb-scm.html

    ReplyDelete